Good afternoon. My name is Regina, and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Agilent Technologies, Inc. Third Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speakers' remarks, there will be a question and answer session. If you'd like to ask a question during this time, simply press *1. To withdraw your question, press *1 a second time. Thank you. Parmeet Ahuja, you may begin the conference. Thank you.

Welcome everyone to Agilent's conference call for 2025. With me are Padraig McDonnell, Agilent President and CEO, and Rodney Gonzalez, Agilent Vice President and Interim CFO. Joining the Q&A will be Simon May, President of the Life Sciences and Diagnostics Markets Group, Angelica Riemann, President of the Agilent CrossLab Group, and Mike Zhang, President of Applied Markets Group. This presentation is being webcast live. The press release for our third quarter financial results, investor presentation, and information to supplement today's discussion, along with the recording of this webcast, are available on our website at investor.agilent.com. Today's comments will refer to non-GAAP financial measures. You'll find the most directly comparable GAAP financial metrics and reconciliations on our website. Unless otherwise noted, all references to increases or in financial metrics are year-over-year, and references to revenue growth are on a core basis. Core revenue growth is adjusted for the impact of currency exchange rates and any acquisitions and divestitures completed within the past twelve months. Guidance is based on forecasted exchange rates. As a reminder, beginning in 2025, we implemented certain changes to our reporting structure related to the reorganization of our three business segments. We have recast our historical segment information to reflect these changes and have provided the financial details on our website. These changes have no impact on our company's consolidated financial statements. During this call, we will also make forward-looking statements about the financial performance of the company. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties and are only valid as of today. The company assumes no obligation to update them. Please look at the company's recent SEC filings for a more complete picture of our risk and other factors. And now I'd like to turn the call over to Padraig.

Hello, everyone, and thank you for joining today's call. Agilent delivered outstanding results of $1.74 billion in revenue in the third quarter, exceeding our guidance while continuing to transform our enterprise operating model in a highly dynamic environment. We also delivered $1.37 earnings per share in the quarter. Thank you to the Agilent team who has remained laser-focused on our customers and committed to our mission of advancing the quality of life. Our fiscal 2025 third quarter marks our fifth consecutive quarter of sequential core revenue acceleration, a testament to how we've evolved our enterprise strategy to be market-first and then realigned our businesses to our markets. For this fiscal year, we've gone from 1.2% in Q1 to 5.3% in Q2 and now 6.1% in Q3. Just as important, our two-year growth stack also is improving, showing that this is a durable momentum, not just a short-term bounce. The two-year stack is a summation of our growth over two consecutive years, providing a clear view of sustained performance by smoothing out short-term quarterly fluctuations. Given this strength, we are raising our fiscal 2025 full-year revenue guidance to the range of $6.91 to $6.93 billion, representing a core growth of 4.5% at the midpoint. This is a $150 million increase from our prior range at the midpoint and one and a half percentage points of additional core growth. A clear step up in our growth outlook heading into Q4. This upgrade reflects our confidence in delivering another step up of revenue into Q4 even as we absorb the impact of tariffs this year. Momentum is broad-based and led by our two largest end markets, pharma and chemicals and advanced materials. In Q3, both grew 9% and 10%, respectively. In pharma, small molecule grew double digits fueled by demand in downstream QAQC…

In my comments today, I will provide additional details on revenue in the quarter, as well as walk through the income statement, and cover other key financial metrics. I'll then cover our updated full-year and fourth-quarter guidance, Q3 revenue was $1.74 billion above the high end of our guidance. On a core basis, we posted growth of 6.1% while reported growth was 10.1%. Currency had a favorable impact of 2.1% which was a point and a half better than what we estimated as part of our guidance. M and A contributed 1.9% in line with our expectation. Gross margins in Q3 came in at 53.1%, down year on year driven by currency, tariffs, and the impact of downtime to expand capacity at BioVectra as Padraig mentioned earlier. Operating margin was 25.1% in Q3, and has been consistent across the year in increasingly challenging conditions. Ignite is enabling us to translate top-line growth into bottom-line results while we continue to invest in innovation and growth. As Padraig indicated, margins were below expectations. We've seen roughly equal impact from three areas. First, our higher revenue volume drove up net tariff costs as we shipped additional products and backfill logistics centers to support Q4 growth. Even while full tariff mitigation is still on track for FY 2026. Next, we increased variable pay expectations. Higher awards driven by stronger business performance, consistent with our pay-for-performance culture. Finally, we invest in incremental commercial spend required to support short and long-term revenue growth including for critical product launches and improving our geographical coverage. For Q4, we are targeting a sequential operating margin improvement of approximately 230 basis points We expect most of this improvement to come from leveraging our fixed cost as we drive another sequential increase in volume. We are also getting meaningful contribution from…

Thanks, Rodney. These strong results are a testament to the progress we've made as a company over the past year. We are encouraged by the growth momentum we have created and look forward to building on that success next quarter and into the future. Thank you for your attention. Hand over now to Parmeet to kick off for Q&A. Parmeet?

Thanks, Padraig. Operator, if you could please provide instructions for Q&A now.

At this time, I'd like to remind everyone in order to ask Our first question will come from the line of Dan Brennan with TD Cowen. Please go ahead.

Great. Thanks for the questions. Maybe just the first one on the margins since obviously top line really strong, but the margins were light as you kind spoke to them. Can you just unpack the three variables you kind of highlighted? Kinda how much are you spending? How much are you buying more inventory for yourself? How much was that a factor? You know, in question, you know, the topic number two and three, variable pain and spend. I'm just wondering, like, what the return on that is as as we think about the 4Q guide and we think about jumping off into 26% to that do some of those investments benefit you in '26? So any any help on kinda unpacking those, and then I have a follow-up.

Yeah. Thanks, Dan. So first of all, you know, really committed to our long-term commitment goals around margins. And know, as tariffs along with related logistics costs were the biggest single impact that we had And the net impact in dollars will trend downwards at the start of '26 and will fully mitigate tariffs '25 And and I wanna kind of be clear that the headwind will peak in Q4. in '26. But, to your question about, the area, so it's higher tariffs driven by higher than expected volumes. Incremental commercial investment, and, higher variable pay in equal measure. Let me talk a little bit about the commercial investments and why we're doing it. So you see the demand and the the revenues, the demand for a replacement cycles, and our markets are going up. We've did a lot of work on our commercial org over the years and making it effective But now is the time to invest invest for this demand that's gonna go into '20 to make sure we can capture it and increase increase our market share, which we're already doing on it. So I don't know, Rodney, if you wanna give any more color on that, but that's that's how it breaks out.

No. I think, Padraig, those are very good points in terms of why we were below our expectations for the quarter. When we look at it from a year-on-year basis, we were down about 230 basis points Again, the big thing was tariffs and and logistics related costs associated with those tariffs. And that total would be about 200 basis points on a year-on-year basis. It was pretty significant. On top of that, we saw unfavorable we saw the effects of currency. And also the effects of the, bio vector shutdown. So when you look at all those piece together, that's why we saw our operating margins decline about 230 basis points year on year.

Got it. Okay. I know there'll be a bunch of more questions there. But maybe just a second one, just on pharma. Super strong. I think I heard NASD growing kind of north of 20%. So can you just unpack a little bit on what the outlook calls for for kind of in the back half of the year and as we look ahead? And then know you gave some color on, you know, large pharma being strong, sounds like there's still some headwinds with biologics. Maybe just some more color underneath of what you're seeing in pharma. Kind of how we think about the pharma outlook from here.

No problem, Dan. I'll I'll kick it off, I'll hand over to Simon about NASD. So pharma, you know, it's our largest end market, grew 9% overall. Small molecule grew double digits, and that was really fueled by demand for downstream QA strong adoption, an increasing replacement of the Infinity Tree, which is now mid-teens in terms of growth. And what we're seeing from the Infinity Tree is actually early adopters coming back for a larger which is really positive. On the biopharma side, we saw high single digits overall and, you know, ex NASD were flat, and that's really around US biopharma spending continues to be muted, which was expected. But what we're seeing really in the market is we're not seeing any concerns translate into negative impact around MFN or tariffs at all, but we have we have early indications of a standard year end in terms of customer spend in pharma. So customer budgets are have really started to normalize, and customers are asking for larger quotes to spend by the year end. And if you think about the three major drivers in pharma, really, you're seeing three big areas, global redistribution of small molecule supply chain, which is a net tailwind for us, which is really important on on downstream. Manufacturing capacity investments, we're seeing that in in Americas. Asia, and you and and then Europe driven by you know, blockbuster success and GLP ones, etcetera, but also macroeconomic conditions. And and, you you know, you do see capital budgets in biopharma remain conservative venture capital funding. But we do think over time as interest rates come down, that will be released steadily over time. But on the NASD, part, I'm gonna hand it over to Simon.

Yeah. Thanks, Padraig. I'd say for NASD we were very happy with the quarter overall, and we continue to be very happy with the momentum we see for NASD both as we move towards the end of the year and into 2026. As I think we mentioned in the script, we saw really robust revenue growth well into the 20s, for an ASD, It was also another really solid quarter with orders, And as we look at some of the macros that we're seeing out in the field as well, it was very notable quarter in terms of some approvals and label expansions that we saw out in the marketplace. Which really just emphasized the confidence that we have. In this therapeutic modality and also our capabilities to capitalize therein. So as we put it all together, we're happy with the momentum that we have coming into the end of the year. I think we've said previously for the full year, we're looking at high single digit, nudging double digit. I'd say we're increasingly confident now where the double-digit full-year outlook is concerned. Bit too early to call FY '26 but I'd say we're also tentatively confident about the momentum carrying forward there in stay tuned for more over the coming weeks.

Terrific. Thank you.

Our next question comes from the line of Tycho Peterson with Jefferies. Please go ahead.

Hey, thanks. I want to probe a little more on the pharma comments just kind of reduce dependency on sign-offs that that you noted. I'm just curious, how widespread is that? Is that globally? Is it CDMOs, just large pharma? How much pent-up demand, I guess, do you think there is that could come through with this you know, change in in sign-off dependency?

Yeah. No. We've really noted that across all geographies actually within particularly within small molecule, but in large pharma, of course, bio small to medium biopharma is slightly different in that regard. But what we're seeing is, Tycho, is really that replace cycle that we've talked about. We've always talked about it being gradual. Moving ahead, and people are releasing budgets for it. I would say the velocity has improved in that. And we're releasing larger quotes for the end of the year. So that's always bodes very well for the for for the end of the year. And when you when you have, approvals not going to executive or even higher levels in the company that's giving given into the hands of lab managers, or or site managers, that makes a big difference in momentum.

Okay. And then a follow-up on PFAS Was that a little bit softer in The US? I know you talked about it being up 10% overall, but it it seems to imply that US was maybe down or or pretty soft the quarter. I'm just curious if there's something going on there.

Sorry. Sorry. Maybe you can't hear me now, but I'll repeat that. So low double-digit growth overall in Q3, which is a solid result, 50% year-to-date growth remains a really strong opportunity. In Americas, we were down 20% and that was really around the US EPA changes that drove impact. No policy change that impacts the volume of testing, but uncertainty around CapEx spend. And increasing clarity around the EPA changes will will mean there's a little bit of a question over Q4 and Q1, but overall, I would say, PFAS is going extremely well around, around the globe.

Okay. Maybe just one last one. The commercial investments that you flagged, when when did you decide to move forward with those, and why they baked into into the guide?

Yeah. So look at it. You know, you deal with what's in front of you and where you're see your momentum in terms of orders, and we had a you know, as we many years transforming our commercial organization into one centralized area globally. We have a number of product launches that are coming out, and we are way ahead of our ramp to volumes both on the Infinity Tree and, for example, on the ProIQ LCMS. So so it was really a dynamic situation and, come from commercial and experience over many, many years, you need to get investment in early when the when the market start to come back, and you have opportunities because it's a very competitive place. We want to gain share not only in our accounts, but in competitor accounts. And we want to continue to raise our ability to have technical expertise in the field to really help with that.

Okay. Thanks.

Our next question comes from the line of Rachel Vatnsdal with JPMorgan. Please go ahead.

Perfect. Good afternoon. Thanks so much for taking the questions. Just wanted to push on 2026 expectations here. If we look at your fourth-quarter guide, the midpoint really implies around like a 5.5% organic growth rate at the midpoint And it looks like consensus is right around that number for next year as well. So can you just walk us through the moving pieces on 2026? Is taking that fourth-quarter number and rolling it into next year a reasonable starting point? Or are there things that we should be thinking of?

Yeah. I'll I'll start off, I'll hand it over to Rodney. I think, you know, of course, it's too early to give out, any detail on the guide for '26. But on the revenue side, let me talk about revenue and margins. And revenue, the second half of '25 was most meaningful. Meaningfully stronger than the first and that provided really that provides a really positive indication momentum into '26. And while while, of course, we need to remain mindful of the broader economic environment and more challenging comps, we do see this as a a solid foundation for for for growth. And on the margin side, you know, we've addressed many of the challenges in '25 and tariffs being the largest and we expect tariffs to be fully mitigated within the year, and that should provide a tailwind And, of course, we have Ignite that's gonna drive us forward on it. But, Rodney, I don't know if you wanna give more color '26.

Yeah. I I yeah. Padraig, I think you know, you mentioned some of the tailwinds that we saw, particularly on the margin side, both as we continue to mitigate tariffs, we will see improvement from a margin perspective as we go into into '26. I think the other thing is we'll as as you mentioned, we'll continue to see savings as associated with Ignite. One of the things we still need to be factoring in is what kind of cost increases we may be seeing from our from our suppliers. So that would be a bit of a tailwind that we're still looking at.

Great. And then just as my follow-up here, I wanted to ask around budget slash assumptions. Padraig, you mentioned a little bit how pharma companies are putting in some larger orders before year that they have some more visibility on budgets overall. So are you embedding any budget flush assumptions into that fourth-quarter guide? Or would that be upside Thank you.

Yes. So I think we're we what we're seeing is quotes actually at this stage, not orders, for the end of the end of the year. And the early early, indications that it's more of a standard year-end in terms of of budget flush. And I think it's been quite a few years before since we've seen that, and everybody knows the history. In our markets. But customers are starting to budgets start to normalize and seeing larger value quotes is is is, what we see in it. So we're we're guiding with what we see at the moment.

Our next question will come from the line of Michael Ryskin with Bank of America. Please go ahead.

Great. Thanks for taking the question. I want to touch on chemicals and advanced materials. Really, strong quarter there and kind of up on it being pretty broad-based. We've had some more mixed data points there, so that was a little bit of surprise. Could you just talk a little bit more about, you know, where you saw it geographically? Sort of what gives you confidence that there was no pull forward and that's, that that's a little bit more sustainable going forward?

Yeah. Thanks for the question. I think, you know, it's been, fantastic in terms of growth, 10% growth in Q3 broad-based 10% in chemicals and advanced materials. And our, you know, our strong position in our leadership in our platforms is really important, and our our really strong connection with customers But but really driven by three areas, I would say, Q3. I think, capacity growth from supply chain regionalization is very true for that. That market. Greenfield investments, by the way, in both broad chemicals and advanced materials, and actually replacement momentum. We've often talked about this, Aled, that it's not only LC replacement cycles that are important, but we're now starting to see replacement investments as we go forward on it. And it's driven, I would say, by you know, the chemical sector continuing to lead driving demand in downstream industries like semiconductor and, of course, energy growth in AFO, which is gonna continue, and The Americas, that's gonna continue. So I think overall, I think we're really pleased with results. We see that continuing. And we see that continuing particularly in in in in both of those areas as as we go forward.

Okay. And then following up on, Rachel's question just now and kinda taking it back to the margin topic. I think you quantified tariffs for third quarter. Could you remind us what the tariff hit is on the margin line for all of fiscal year 'twenty five? And then when you talk about fully mitigating for next year, it's just, you know, just making sure the simple math is we're just kinda assuming that at a least that much is how much comes back next year, on the gross margin line. Is that the right way to think about when you talk about, you know, being able to offset for next year?

Yeah. So I think, you're thinking about it the right way. You know, I think we focus in three areas on the tariff side with mitigation, leverage an existing manufacturing footprint, around the globe, working with suppliers to relocate, manufacturing locations to minimize tariffs, and, of course, targeted pricing changes. And we see the most critical activities implemented by Q4 and ramping through '26. But the key element of our mitigation that it will be implemented by the '25 will ramp through '26. So I think, Rodney, I don't know if you wanna add any color to that, but how we see it.

Yeah. Yeah. I I think the only other point, Padraig, is that, yeah, we recognized about $35 million We we were originally looking about $25 million in tariffs tariff costs in the third quarter. That's up about $10 million and we expect the same level in the fourth quarter. So $70 million for the second half. And again, we have a lot of our actions. We are plan most of our plan mitigation actions will be implemented by the end of this quarter. And so we should start seeing that, those the impact to our our gross margins as we start moving into Q1 and through, through '26.

Okay. So $70 million for the year for '25. Alright. Thanks.

Our next question comes from the line of Patrick Donnelly with Citi. Please go ahead.

Thanks taking questions. Maybe just stay on that same topic there that Mike was on on the on the margin side. I guess, given that tariff piece, given Ignite, obviously, some temporary costs in this quarter impacting the margin, You know, Padraig, I know when we've talked in the past, you you've always kinda said, hey. There's a reason we put the plus sign on on the margin algorithm for the out years. I guess, is next year setting up that it has that potential to be an out margin year given kind of the headwinds this year that will not recur next year? Just trying frame that you know, if if you are able to grow, you know, call it over 5%, it feels like it has that potential, but just wanna if that makes sense and and see if you could throw some numbers around it.

Yeah. Look. There's three really key tailwinds, I think. You know, Ignite continues to drive gains. We've we've delivered, a lot of gains over us Tariff mitigations will be will be higher and will ramp through the year. And the volume should be should be really a helper on it. So overall, I think, in good shape. Of course, it's too early to guide on us. And to say what it's gonna be, but Ignite is there for a reason. We put out a 100 basis points plus for a reason, and we still feel very, very good about that as we go forward. I will say, also, you know, if you look at Q4 margins Patrick, it's something to be really clear about is that they're expected to really increase versus Q3. We're expecting a 200 basis point sequential margin improvement from Q3 to Q4 when Q2 to Q3 was flat. And that's going to be driven by leverage on sequential uptick in revenue in Q4, which we have good line of sight of. And I think while in the increase the while we while revenue increased sequentially, you you know, the full quarter tariffs along with currencies were headwinds that offset against it and the incremental Ignite savings But I I think for next year, we're in we're in good shape.

Okay. That's helpful. And then I guess maybe just in the quarter, know, what you saw on on kind of the pricing side, it was definitely a question we get. I think people are just seeing the margins and wondering if pricing is a part of that. So if you could just talk about what you saw pricing versus volume in the quarter and expectations going forward, that would be helpful. Thanks, Padraig.

Yeah. Rodney, you wanna take this one? Yeah. I'll I'll take this one. Yeah. We're actually starting to see some more movement in our pricing. And for the quarter, we saw about a 100 bps improvement in pricing.

Okay. Thanks.

Our next question comes from the line of Jack Meehan with Nephron Research. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Good afternoon. Wanted to ask about how you think the trade tariff dynamics are influencing your customer buying behavior. Last quarter, you talked about the $15 million of consumable pull forward, dollars 15 million instrument push out. Did that play out as expected? And then just anything incremental that you saw in terms of stocking, destocking? Thank you. Yeah. I mean, Jack, thanks for the question. On that side, nothing. You know, we we we did talk about that pull forward in consumables last quarter, which worked itself out very, very quickly. And maybe I'll ask Angelica to add more color on this in a in a second. But we have seen no pull forwards. We've seen nothing in terms of Scott's stocking. We we've monitored that quite quite quite closely, so so nothing on that side. And I would say lab activity remains very very strong. But, Angelica, on the consumables side, maybe you can give some color.

Yeah. Thanks, Padraig. Again, thanks, Jack, for the question. You know, as as Padraig has already said, we had the pull through in Q2, but we had mid-single-digit growth in Q3, which is no indication of any further pull forward. The lab activity we're seeing is is continuing to support the demand here. No doubt about it. We had good growth across all of our end markets and across our regions. So we're continuing to see strong lab activity, driving strong recurring revenue demands.

Great. And we expect that to continue. Okay. And then a unrelated question, was curious about the China diagnostics market, saw the reference to Daco ex China. A lot of questions around VBP and DRG just for the universe broadly speaking. Do you mind just reminding us what your exposure is to China Diagnostics and what, if any, you're seeing in regard to those topics?

Yeah. So, I mean, our exposure is is is very low in China in terms of diagnostics. It's a very stable business as we go forward on it. But Simon, do you want to give some color on the the China story? With BBB? We're not really being impacted by it.

I think the long story short is that we've seen minimal impacts so far as we look at our diagnostic tools in China, we do see some local vendors there. But where Agilent's product offering is concerned, we're really serving more advanced staining applications, and I think we got a pretty esoteric product offering and menu there. So pressure, but I don't think we've really seen that trickle through in a meaningful way.

Okay. You, guys.

Our next question comes from the line of Vijay Kumar with Evercore ISI. Please go ahead.

Congrats on a nice line print here. Maybe on the top line question here. The I I think last quarter, in second quarter, there was some some instrument impact, if memory serves me. Correct. Did TQ benefit from from timing element here on on instrument side? The the sort of another related actually, that top line question is, you mentioned tariff rate. When when you say pricing benefit, are you including surcharges as part of pricing? Could that explain part of, what we're seeing here in margins? How much of this core beef was was in a tariff surcharge related in in the instrument catch up from prior quarter.

Yeah. No. The thanks, Vijay. Just a few points on on the instrument side. Firstly, I think we've seen a steady improvement in replacements. You know, total instruments grew high single digits. And LCMS grew, you know, low double digits, we're very very pleased with LC and LC mass growth in the Infinity Tree, of course, where we're seeing on the, you know, the replacement cycle of aging fleets. And, of course, new new sites. In terms of pricing and surcharges, that that hasn't been realized yet. That takes a while to go through the system. You know, we we have a tariff task force that is second to none that's run through the Ignite program here where we look at data analytics So we do it in a very structured way, but that takes time to go through. So we'll see those pricing in Q and '26 and beyond.

That's helpful. And and off of the topic on on fiscal twenty six common part, like one of your peer they sort of hinted at end market growth, perhaps being in in the low single digit range. Maybe with some share gains perhaps pointing to, like, four plus. How like, is that is that is that a reasonable framework on how we think about Agilent? Or are there any anything that's unique? Whether it's a chemical exposure or China, anything that's not I mean, that makes Agilent different versus, you know, how some of your peers have commented about fiscal twenty Yeah. Look. And I think, you know, we feel very positive about '26 across all of our markets. You see the momentum this time through applied and and the pharma side. Driven by the top line. We think we're going to see that continue. Over time. I think as you look at different areas, what makes us different? I think China, there's gonna be a large stimulus order coming towards the end of the year where you'd highly successful in that in the past. We've kept very focused with our teams there. So we we expect China to kinda continually improve through '26 And, of course, that that area is is really important. And and I think as well, CDMO mix is very different. You know, 20% growth in NASD. BioVectra, we prime the pumps for for for '26. That's gonna be a high grower, and some of the indications are are really really great on it. So I think that's really important. And, you know, we're you you you see our results in our chemical and applied materials. You know, these are secular drivers we we have significantly high market share, and that's gonna continue because of reshoring or fabs about where they're being built. Of course, battery investments in EVs, technology, and that makes us, I would say, very differentiated as well.

Understood. Thank you.

Next question comes from the line of Doug Schenkel with Wolfe Research. Please go ahead.

Hey, good afternoon, everybody, and thank you for taking my questions. I want to start on guidance philosophy. So on on one hand, I I know you guys know that it's particularly important to set financial targets at levels that are especially derisked. Given how difficult the last few years have been across the tool space. On the other hand, you clearly had a lot of strength in the quarter, and you seemingly have really strong momentum heading into year end. How do you balance momentum and strength with the goal of maybe skewing the error bars around your guidance targets to the upside? Maybe asked a different way, how would you describe your visibility on on hitting these targets heading into year end?

Heading into year end, we have very good visibility. You know? I think particularly on the order book and what we put out on our guide boat on on revenue and margins. I think '26, you know, we we we don't give out guidance. You know, Doug, on it, but you know, we do see that this positive momentum is not gonna just stop at the end of '25. We're gonna continue to see it. Now what that what that relates to GUIDE and, of course, a lot can happen between now and the end of our fiscal year in the in the the macro environment, tariffs, etcetera, So we will we'll be giving guidance in the next half. But it's it is it's something we wanna be as as usual in Agilent, we wanna be very clear about what we're putting out at the end of the year, and it's clear and it's achievable and going forward on it. So we'll have more next quarter on that one.

Okay. Thank you very much for that. And then the the next topic I wanna to talk about is capital deployment. So I I think your net leverage ratio was point nine times just under one How are you thinking about capital deployment? It seems like you're feeling better about what you can control and and maybe even your ability to navigate some of the things that are outside of your control from a policy standpoint. So if that's right, how does that impact your thoughts on M and A and or accelerating buybacks beyond dilution mitigation? And kind of related to that, how would you describe organizational readiness for something bigger given how how how many changes have occurred in leadership over the past year? Thank you.

Yeah. So let me talk about the last one first because I think it's a it's a it's a great point. If you see how Ignite is running inside and about how we're being able to execute inside, I think that has usages beyond beyond Agilent if we if we do acquisitions in the future, whatever size they will be. So I think our readiness is extremely is extremely high on us. Our priorities are are not not overall changing, but we do expect M and A to be a more meaningful part of our capital deployment going forward. But I wanna be clear on three things, Doug, is it's gonna be a disciplined approach that's gonna be aligned to our pillars of our strategy so you won't see any far far distant areas that are not linked to the strategy. We're gonna be focusing on growth opportunities and, of course, value to shareholders. So, so if you came into our our business development sections, we have a small list of very high-quality topics we're talking about. But, also, internally, we're investing back in the business. Invested heavily in digital this year. A new CRM system, new online capabilities, we're investing back in commercials that that goes along hand in hand with that. So so I think it's it's gonna be a very disciplined approach, but we're we're, we're we're ready, as as we go into '26. I don't know, Rodney, if okay. That's fine.

Okay. Thank you again, Padraig.

Thanks, Doug.

Our next question comes from the line of Puneet Souda with Leerink Partners. Please go ahead.

Yes. Hi, Padraig and team. Thanks for taking my questions. First one really on the momentum or a change in momentum, if you saw that between July and August, you are clearly pointing to a strong, you know, book to bill for the last couple of quarters, but just trying to get a sense of if there's an acceleration in the near term. And and, obviously, you're seeing a normal budget flush replacement cycle is working. So I just wanna get a sense of is there is there something you saw differently in August? And so and if you could double click on the pharma versus the side of the of of the end markets where you're seeing more stronger pickup. Thank you.

Yeah. So I think, you know, we definitely saw a pickup, and it's reflected of course, in in the numbers that we've seen. We've we've seen a a pickup in quoting activity. We saw significant pick up in replacement cycle. Although it's gradual over time, we did see that in July and August that people are replacing their systems aging fleets. And then, of course, this new greenfield opportunity that you see in both markets, pharma, and in, in chemical and advanced materials benefiting from that. So I would say that overall, really good. Our book to bill is greater than one that continues on that side. Our win rates are extremely good. Our market share gain, which a little bit offset a few months ago, we're gaining across the board in in all plat in all platforms and geographies. So, the it is it is it is positive. Now, of course, people have quotes for the end of the year, and we expect we we weight those quotes in terms of what we expect to come in, and that's leading to more of a standard year-end CapEx area on it. So and and just to finish off, I would say, if you look at it pharma and and and chemical and applied or chemical and vast materials applied, actually the momentum in both of those major markets is pretty similar. You know, you got a replacement cycle starting on the plat replied side. Probably a lit bit later than the the pharma side, and then you're you're into well into the first innings of a replacement cycle on the LC side. So that's what we're seeing. But driven as well, you know, by adoption of our new platforms, you know, the the new LCMS the ProIQ, and the Infinity Tree really making a difference in customer spending patterns.

Got it. And then just a follow-up on China. Can you just elaborate a bit on what you're seeing in their quarter in China in third quarter? And you talked about stimulus coming through. Maybe just give us a sense of the you know, is that driven by more quoting activity? Is that what what gives you that confidence and and, you know, sort of the magnitude of it? Thank you.

Yeah. So I start off, and I'm gonna hand over to Mike on the stimulus topic, because he's quite close to it. So, two of the largest end end markets, you know, led the results in the quarter. We saw small molecule continues to grow. We grew about 6% Biopharma grew mid-single digits, and we saw that through particular focus on innovative biopharma. Right? So ADCs, oligo or oligos and GLP ones. The CAM market in China grew low teens, and that was led in two areas. Petrochemicals continued to benefit from lower crude oil prices, so, that's very beneficial to us. And, with advanced materials, China continue continues to build out the domestic semiconductor ecosystem, which is really important. There is a new development within China where there's unleashing what is called a new quality product productive forces policy, which is around innovation and investing in innovation. And that's gonna be launched by central government that's gonna increase the pace of innovation across, many industries. And we are extremely well poised to benefit from that because we've invested in a solution center and a lab productivity center that really fits in that. We've actually seen some of some of the orders or quotes for that. Going out. But, overall, I think, China's stable. We see that kind of improving as we go into '26 because of those drivers. But on the stimulus, Mike, do you want to talk a little bit about what you're seeing right now?

Yeah. Greg, first of all, we have a very strong relationship with customers and we are working with customers very closely, continue to support a customer as they prepare for the investment. And we continue to build a strong funnel. Obviously, if, you know, it takes time to materialize, but we're still very excited about the potential And, if you look at the track record, we have very strong and a high win, rate. So, so we are we're very excited about that potential.

Okay. Thank you.

Our next question comes from the line of Dan Leonard with UBS. Please go ahead.

Thank you. My first question is a clarification on the pricing front. Rodney, I think you said pricing was a 100 basis point year-over-year tailwind. But before you also mentioned that value-driven pricing was double the impact of the prior year. So can you help me reconcile those two comments? I thought pricing might have been a bit better a year ago. This is Rodney. No. It was about 50 bps last year. Year on year, and and as I said earlier, about a 100 bps this year. Okay. That's square. Thank you. And then just my follow-up question here. I don't think I've I've heard you talk so much about the replacement opportunity in the chemical market. Since the launch of the Intuvo, and that was a very long time ago. So can you maybe help frame that replacement opportunity that you're alluding to, Padraig?

Yeah. For sure. I'm gonna bring in Mike here on on the AMG side to talk about that.

Yeah. First of all, as Padraig just highlight, we have a very strong market share in this market, and we have a very large installed base. Intruba certainly is, you know, a a great innovation, but we continue to evolve innovation that we have to find Intubers. We continue to put that into, you know, the current platforms And we are seeing a lot of momentums, as you can tell because the customer continue to improve the productivities, embrace embracing the new technologies. But I think what's more important well, let me take, you know, the new GC we just launched as an example, like eighty fifty GC. It's a perfect replacement by to advance the technologies and productivity sustainability that customer are looking for. From us. So overall, I think, you have to, remember our strong position in the market, our very strong portfolios, our continuous innovation. But what's more exciting that we have a strong pipeline innovation to drive as this replacement cycle continue to accelerate.

Mister Ahuja, I'll turn the call back over to you.

Thanks. Thanks, Regina, and thanks, everyone, for joining the call today. With that, we'd like to end the call. Have a good rest of the day, everyone.

This concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect.