Good day, ladies and gentlemen and welcome to the Advance Auto Parts third quarter 2008 conference call. Before we begin, Judd Nystrom, Vice President of Finance and Investor Relations will make a brief statement concerning forward looking statements that will be made on this call.

Good morning and thank you for joining us on today’s call. Certain statements made during this conference call will contain forward looking statements that incorporate assumptions based on information currently available to the company. Any statements that are not related to historical facts are forward looking statements as that term is defined in the Private Security Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, and assumptions according to those listed from time to time in the company’s annual report on Form 10-K and in other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. If any of these risks or uncertainties materialize or if any of the underlying assumptions prove incorrect, the company’s actual results may differ materially from the anticipated results discussed in these forward looking statements. The company intends the forward looking statements to speak only as of the time of this conference call and does not undertake to update or revise them as more information becomes available. Our results can be found in our press release and 8-K filing which are available on our website at www.advanceautoparts.com. For planning purposes, our fourth quarter earnings release is scheduled for Wednesday, February 18, 2009 after market close and our quarterly conference call is scheduled for the morning of Thursday, February 19, 2009. To be notified of the dates of the future earnings report you can sign up through the Investor Relations section on our website. Finally, our replay on this call will be available on our website for the period of one year. Now, let me turn the call over to Darren Jackson, our President and CEO who will be followed by Jim Wade, EVP, Customer Development Officer-Commercial, Elwyn Murray, EVP, Customer Development Officer – DIY, Kevin Freeland, EVP, Merchandising, Supply Chain and IT, and Mike Norona, EVP and Chief Financial Officer.

Thanks, Judd. Good morning everyone and welcome to our 2008 third quarter conference call. Our third quarter results, like the financial markets were like a roller coaster ride with a number of ups and downs. The financial results were below our expectations. On the other hand our strategic results exceeded our expectations for the quarter. Our top line was lower than expected, driven by our DIY sales performance. Our gross profit rate exceeded forecasts; SG&A was higher than anticipated because we simply were not able to adjust variable costs to the sharp profit sales. Despite the outcome, I am proud of how our team members consistently served our customers better than anyone else. Our market share numbers indicate we are able to grow our commercial market share and maintain our DIY market share in a very difficult environment. Our strategic results were a high point and included the following accomplishments; double digit comp in commercial, double digit revenue growth for AI, completion of our team member engagement survey and company-wide satisfaction survey. We also upgraded inventory in approximately 200 stores, launched pilots of custom mix and space optimization and improved our AP ratio. Overall our year to date results are still ahead of expectations we set at the beginning of the year. I expect a 90 day quarterly result will be volatile as we transition a 76 year old business. Our year to date results are a better barometer of our transformation progress. Evaluating the success or failure of a transformation every 90 days is like pulling up a potato every 90 minutes to check on its growth. Change will be difficult to discern in short quarterly windows. Jim, Elwyn, Kevin and Mike will cover the changes and results in more detail. We’re taking actions in the fourth quarter to…

Thank you, Darren. Good morning. Through our commercial acceleration strategies, we continue to increase sales and gain market share in the third quarter. With our less than 3% overall market share there is still room for much growth. This is our third consecutive quarter of double digit growth with a 10.8% comp for the quarter. Our comps are lower than our 13.5% increase in the second quarter however we believe the tax stimulus in the last quarter and a more challenging internal environment this quarter had some impact on our growth, however we don’t believe our sales trend is fundamentally changed. While we remain pleased with our commercial results we are not totally satisfied. I’d like to congratulate our commercial team but as always, we know there’s still much work to do. We remain committed to aggressively growing the commercial business and despite current economic trends; we believe we can continue to achieve double digit comp. We’ll continue to focus on the basics of our commercial business; increased parts availability, emphasis on key brands, continued team development and strengthening customer relationships with our garages. A key component of our commercial acceleration strategy is to revolutionize our sales floors. To accomplish this, we are putting in place the leadership, structure and tools to drive our future. I had the opportunity to attend a meeting of our entire sales floors a couple weeks ago and I can’t describe the passion and excitement of our team as they prepare for 2009. We’re still in the early stages of establishing the necessary foundation to maximize the potential of our commercial business. We’re making great progress every quarter in building the model that will achieve this potential. To give an example of what great looks like, I’d like to share a story with you about…

Thank you, Jim, and good morning. First I would like to acknowledge our disappointment with our third quarter DIY count. While encouraged by our negative 0.08% second quarter count, we now have a brutal reminder that the third quarter is more representative of the continued softness in DIY sales than the second quarter comp. The macro environment clearly impacted the quarter as consumers are struggling and the DIY business continues to remain in crisis mode. As tough as the macroeconomics environment is, and with customer traffic continuing to be down, we still see a tremendous opportunity to capture more of the business that is walking through our doors every day. Today I will share insight around this opportunity with you. During the third quarter, we completed a 100 day assessment of our DIY business. One of our key findings was that only five out of ten customers walking through our doors today were able to purchase everything they need to be successful. Two out of ten make a partial purchase and three out of ten leave empty handed. We were able to identify the root causes of these missed opportunities. Our findings reveal that we have significant opportunity to grow our business by addressing what I will refer to as the table stakes for our business; parts availability, attachments selling and effective scheduling. We see pockets around the country where we are winning with the table stakes. However, we are not getting consistent execution with enough scales to reverse prevailing DIY trends. Although we are disappointed with the results of the quarter, we are encouraged by the potential opportunities that are within our control. To drive towards our full potential now, we must do a better job satisfying the needs of customers who visit our stores today. That means greeting…

Thanks, Elwyn and good morning. Our availability excellence strategy is focused on continuing to strive to become the dominant parts provider in our industry through increased land offerings and product availability. I’m pleased to be here today to provide visibility to the key areas that will drive long time value. With regards to merchandising, we will continue to invest in merchandising capabilities, invest in parts and reduced our own inventory. We have restructured the merchandising department into eight cross functional teams. The transition to this integrated operating model progressed during the third quarter ahead of schedule. We have completed phase one of our new category managing process and are on track to improve our category performance in FY ‘09. We also began the roll out of the new price optimization tool and expect to realize improvements in the gross margin in the near future. We are improving the quality of the inventory as well as the quantity to drive incremental sales. In fact, we have upgraded inventory in almost 200 stores in the third quarter and over 700 stores year to date which represents and investment of nearly $50 million year to date. To improve the quality of inventory in our stores, we tested a significant enhancement to our custom mix system in two major markets. These test markets achieved higher sales and gross margins with no incremental inventory investments. Our custom mix systems begins with national roll out in fourth quarter for planogram resets slated for first quarter 2009. We anticipate the full roll out will take several years. We also completed a successful test to improve the accuracy of our store inventory. The test scores achieve higher true in stocks, higher sales, and lower inventory shrink. This program is slated to roll out to all stores over the next two quarters. In our supply chain area, we continue to identify opportunities to drive supply chains efficiencies. For example, we’re on track to complete work on engineered standards in our first DC next quarter and plan to migrate these standards to the balance of our DCs next year. This project enables us to improve labor productivity in our main distribution centers and reduce distribution expenses over time. Turning to information technology, we are continuing to leverage IT in support of our business strategies. As previously announced, we began a multiyear effort to replace our legacy system Oracle for merchandising systems. Work on this critical system will be brought online in stages beginning in the second quarter of next year. Now, let me turn the call over to Mike to review our financial results.

Thank you, Kevin and good morning everyone. Our third quarter was a challenging financial quarter for our company as announced in our release on October 7, 2008. I plan to cover the following topics with you this morning: 1. Provide an overview of our third quarter results. 2. Share the actions we are taking as a result of the current business environment and 3. Connect how these actions will position us for FY ‘09 and beyond. Turning to our third quarter, total revenue increased 2.6% to $1.19 billion compared to revenue of $1.16 billion in the third quarter last year. This revenue increase was driven by the net addition of 124 new stores in the past 12 months. Year to date, our revenue is $3.95 billion. The roughly flat comp was comprised of a 10.8% increase in commercial sales including Autopart International, offset by a 4.1% decrease in DIY sales. This compares to a 7.5% increase in commercial and a 1.2% decrease in DIY in the third quarter of last year. Year to date our comp sales have increased 1.1%. For the quarter, our total commercial sales were $359 million resulting in a 14.4% increase over last year. Currently 84% of Advance stores have commercial programs as compared to 82% last year. Commercial sales represented 30% of our total sales for our third quarter compared to 27% last year. Clearly our commercial teams are leading our company with this double digit growth rate despite the challenging economic environment. Our gross profit rate was 48.6% in the third quarter compared to 47.9% last year, which reflects a 65 basis point improvement. This improvement was primarily driven by more effective pricing, improved shrink rates, and a higher mix of business from Auto Parts International. SG&A expenses were 40.5% of sales compared to…

(Operator Instructions) Your first question comes from Tony Cristello of BB&T Capital Markets. Tony Cristello – BB&T Capital Markets: I guess one question I had and it came up a few times during your commentary is Autopart International and Darren, maybe this is a question for Jim, but it appears that AI is certainly showing some better sales trends and have some modest positive contribution to gross margin and I understand that SG&A at AI is a bit higher. Can you update a little bit or discuss more on strategy now that you have for AI as it differs from the core commercial business with Advance. Any reason beyond perhaps parts availability in the commercial focus that could be behind the positive improvement and sales trends and then also, how does the profitability of that segment look right now versus how it has in the past?

Tony, why don’t we do this. Why don’t I have Jim talk a little bit about.. We’ve seen a wonderful turnaround in AI this year in terms of their business. You can see in their comps and their profitability, and I’ll have Jim just hum a few bars as to what’s different and what’s driving the business, and then I’ll come back and give you just a couple sentences on how we’re thinking about AI going forward because clearly three years into it how we see different opportunities with them and how it might shape our overall store portfolio going forward.

Tony, when you look back at the roughly three years that we’ve owned AI, at the time we purchased the company they had about 60 stores and they were opening 2 or 3 or 4 or 5 stores a year and obviously as part of the acquisition we wanted to see the team there accelerate the openings and they did that and I think it took us a year or 18 months to get to a point where we had everything in place to be able to accelerate their growth and the great news, I think over the past year to 18 months is we’re now seeing the results of that. If you look at their roughly 125 stores they have today, literally almost half of those have been opened in the last three years, so I think we’re at a point where the team has a very sound new store model in place. The expertise they have in foreign car parts which is obviously a part of the business that’s growing very quickly these days and they’re using that to drive much better performance. We’re excited about what the team there has accomplished and I think they’re positioned very well to help us grow our total commercial business as we go forward.

Tony, what I would build on as we look forward, you think about the AI purchase, we saw three things. One, Jim talked about, and we received significant [inaudible] to date is their sourcing capability in foreign car parts and learning more about foreign car parts. If you look at our overall inventory mix across Advance Auto Parts, we can see in relation to many of our markets, we’re simply underinvested and underpenetrated in the foreign car parts business and we can look out into the future and know that they can potentially help us with that. An example would be we’re putting some of the AI car parts into our Atlanta market to help fill in some of those voids in the mix so that’s one. Two, it’s interesting that part of the northeast when we positioned the stores next to an Advance store, both stores get better. Part of it, if you think about it, is they become second source partners. It helps the commercial business in terms of the Advance business and it helps them in terms of some of our domestic parts that we can provide to them and as we look out, there could be an opportunity to selectively and I think you heard in Mike’s comments, as we look to next year, we’ll continue to throttle back some of the Advance store openings and we will have an uptick in the selectively putting those to markets where we believe we have [dessification] efforts that will be helpful, but also adjacent of AAP stores in some of our core markets will help both of those businesses. Last but not least there is the benefit of the knowledge of foreign car parts that AI has and how do we use that? They have a tremendous catalog system in terms of foreign car parts that will be accretive to our own catalog system and as we look farther out, I think we’re skimming across the surface right now and I think next year will be more learning as to how those two businesses complement one another in terms of our larger objective, in terms of balancing our business in a 50-50 profile. Tony Cristello – BB&T Capital Markets: When you look at the prototype AI store versus the Advance, can you just talk maybe briefly on the differences from a staffing standpoint to differences from a square footage standpoint, and then also when you think about expansion, is there opportunity to go out and acquire some of these smaller independents or jobbers that are out there, and are those stores that they typically operate consistent with sort of how an AI store may be limiting sort of the amount of green field you may need versus what you can go out and actually acquire in the marketplace?

I think Tony, when you look at their model, obviously their model calls for them to do almost entirely commercial business, so their staffed to do commercial and they’re staffed specifically to have the expertise to sell a much greater portion of foreign vehicle parts, and I think that’s one of the unique parts of their model is that they’ve been able to define how to do that both from the standpoint of the staffing they have in their stores as well as the catalog and the sourcing. From a square footage standpoint, again, they have a lot of flexibility. They’re able to find and effect small warehouse type locations very quickly and they have a pretty wide variety of square footage space that they can fit their operations into, so they’re able to get stores up and going very quickly. From the standpoint of the consolidation and fragmentation of the business, I think we all know today that the commercial business remains extremely fragmented across the country in terms of all the local distributors and jobbers that are out there today and I think over time we’ll certainly see consolidation and in many cases, AI is in a position to participate more effectively in some of the acquisition of small players. I don’t think we necessarily today see that being a major part of what we’re going to be doing but just this year AI picked up a small acquisition in Philadelphia that allowed them to penetrate the market quicker and get access to customers as well as team members that could help them grow, so as we look forward I think and look at the total commercial business, there’s no question as Darren talked about that we have the ability to leverage off of AI and take what they do really well and help us penetrate markets quicker and more effectively.

Your next question comes from David Cumberland of Robert W. Baird. David Cumberland - Robert W. Baird & Co. Inc.: Can you quantify the impact of strategic spending on your expense ratio in the quarter or at least rank it among the factors that cause the higher ratio?

For the quarter, our SG&A was up about 124 basis points and we attribute about two-thirds of that to things that we planned to spend and around our capabilities, new stores, so what you refer to in terms of our capability, investments fall into that two-thirds bucket. David Cumberland - Robert W. Baird & Co. Inc.: On the pricing that you cited as helping gross margin, you’ve referred to this in the pat. Did you make further changes in your approach in the quarter and when might you anniversary the bigger adjustments you made here so far?

Maybe I’ll start then I’ll turn it over to Kevin Freeland to give you some more insight. So as we said from a gross margin perspective, about a third was pricing, a third was mixing more AI in, and then a third was some operational elements like shrink, and maybe I’ll have Kevin just talk a little bit about pricing, what we saw in the quarter.

We essentially are scrutinizing pricing in three different places. The pricing of some discretionary items in the front room the retail business that we do in pars behind the counter, and then commercial pricing. The lift that we saw in third quarter was predominantly centered on the prices that we scrutinized in the front room, and we believe that there are additional opportunities that should manifest themselves in essentially fourth and first quarter but are being offset somewhat by some competitive pricing pressure that we’re seeing in some of the products, predominantly oil and batteries but I think is just a function of the softening in the overall economic environment.

Your next question comes from Dan Wewer of Raymond James. Dan Wewer - Raymond James & Associates, Inc.: Following up, if we’re seeing better prices in the front room, that would primarily benefit the gross margin rate on the DIY side, is that correct?

Inordinately the front room is a DIY business. Dan Wewer - Raymond James & Associates, Inc.: And then they can kind of be related to that, in looking at the gross margin rate for AI, is it actually better than your do it yourself business and substantially better than commercial?

Yes, it is. Yes because it’s virtually all a private label business. Dan Wewer - Raymond James & Associates, Inc.: So, in the future as you grow your sales mix to commercial and then that’s going to be disproportionally driven by AI, that negative pressure on gross margin rate will probably not be evident in the future.

A frame I might give you to think about it is, in commercial pricing, I would say our capabilities on a scale of 1 to 10 in the Advance chain, Jim, correct me if I’m wrong, are closer to one than ten. One of our big efforts next year is we could organize [a historical retack] how do we begin to price our merchandise aligned to a commercial market and so we believe through commercial pricing capabilities there’s an opportunity there. That’s one. You’re right, as we think about AI that becomes a bigger percentage of the mix. Just the mix benefit helps in terms of where we’re going. We have a void today in our capabilities called global sourcing as a whole and we trail Auto Zone by a big percentage. We’re on a journey now to build that global sourcing capability where it makes sense. That should be helpful. Now, that will be offset because structurally when we’re growing our commercial business at rates of 10 plus percent, the nick impact is putting pressure, it is structurally a lower gross margin business, no doubt about that. We are offsetting that as we look forward by these other capabilities and mix benefits that we’re positioning in terms of the overall business. Dan Wewer - Raymond James & Associates, Inc.: That is very helpful. Just one quick question, the drop in gasoline prices from $4.50 a gallon to $2.50, any evidence of that benefiting your do it yourself business?

We didn’t see anything in Q3 and you got to remember, recently we’ve seen gas prices fall, but they hit the actual peak in Q3, so I don’t know if we’ll know the evidence of that until further on throughout the fourth quarter.

Your next question comes from Matt Fassler from Goldman Sachs.

Hi, it’s actually Robert Engenbothom in for Matt from Goldman Sachs. First quick question, could you give us a sense of how a compared change throughout the third quarter and also how they will change through the fourth quarter in the DIY business specifically?

So when you say compares?

In other words, your compares from last year.

Our comparable store trends this year versus last year?

Correct. Yes.

Mike, maybe you take him through, we exit Q2, we start at Q3 because how did things change because we saw pretty dramatic change.

It’s Mike, let me calibrate you back to what happened at the end of Q2 and see if you remember coming out of Q4 of last year and Q1 of this year our DIY business was trending about a minus 3. We go into Q2 and we come out of Q2 and the DIY business is minus 0.08 so there was a tremendous benefit and we attribute that to the economic stimulus. I think it pulled some sales out of Q3. We enter Q3 and we’re trailing actually pretty positively. We get into August, about the third week of August and we saw a I’d say a material drop off about a 400 basis points to about 500 basis points in a very short period of time and then it stabilized. It pretty well stabilized where we finished the quarter at roughly around a minus 4.1 and today we’re seeing it in the minus 2.8 to minus 3.2 range.

As we look forward to the fourth quarter, when we look back, I think we’ve got to think about a couple things. Last year’s fourth quarter, I think we started the quarter out relatively strong and one of the things, again, that we were thinking about literally right after Thanksgiving, it’s as if we got on the down elevator and I think it was more indicative of how the consumers living their life today, and what I mean by that is if we actually look back to this past third quarter we’d say a couple things occurred that back to school happened, candidly, and we’re asking ourselves, “Is the consumer so tight that, you know what, we just fell down on the prioritization list and back to school went to the top because we could see it right in that window.” We knew last year that we had a little better business in September and what we, I said when I took this job, I’ll never talk about weather because it’s indigenous to the industry but we had a little benefit in Q2 in terms of, and you can just see it in some of the product categories like AC than last year we had in Q3. If you put the two quarters together, it’s a reasonable window so that the variant becomes, gee, how is the consumer prioritizing their personal spend? When they are in these unique windows, what we’re trying to understand is, back to school and Christmas, do things change because they’re so tight and one of the things we’re sensitive to advantaging the business too is we don’t want to end up going through a trap door again post Thanksgiving in order to manage the business. But you know what, we’re only going to know that when we talk to you 90 days from now.

One last question. When you look at that fall off that began in the third week of August, could you help decompose that into traffic, convert ticket type components? From Elwyn’s comments, it certainly sounded like both conversion and ticket was driving certainly a big part of that pressure building, if you could help with a little more color there.

I don’t want to harp back there on weather as therein alluded, but there is no question August and early September was inordinately cooler than the average year and we saw in a lot of our AC related refrigerants and parts a pretty precipitous drop off versus same time year ago so that clearly was a hard and tangible number that moved. I would also suggest to you that as the consumer confidence has obviously been shaken, we continue to see softness in the discretionary categories, interior and exterior accessories, appearance, chemicals, things of that nature, continue to show tremendous softness with our business and across the industry.

One of the things we didn’t necessarily quantify in the release but if you held our feet to the fire and said, “Did the hurricane...” When we looked at weekly trends in the hurricane markets and the gas shortage markets, our best guess is a half a point. But you know what, that’s our best guess by looking at the weekly trends and scores. Those things, it’s like the fourth quarter. We should get a little bit of that back. So they hurt you in one quarter but they should come back another quarter, that’s our best guess in terms of another variant that occurred in the quarter, but those things happen. It’s a part of running a business.

Your next question comes from Peter Benedict from Wachovia.

Mike, can you talk about the inventory implications of going faster here on availability excellence? You guys were up 11.5% in dollars in the third quarter, I think about 7.5% per square foot. How should we think about that trending in towards the end of this year and then for next year?

Let me give you a little context for how we’re thinking about the build up of inventory on our financials, and then I’ll turn it over to Kevin to give you some insights of why we’re doing it and what we expect to get. When you look at your inventory being up 11.5% and your sales only being up 2.6%, you would expect that to hop into your cash flow, and one of the reasons it didn’t is that our net owned inventory only c hanged by $4 million from Q3 of last year to Q3 of this year, which means we’re paying for that increased inventory through better vendor terms and partnering with our vendors, so from a financial perspective, you’re not seeing it pop. One of the key strategic elements of our company is availability, excellence, and having the right inventory in the right spot. Maybe I’ll turn it over to Kevin to give you some insights as to how that impacts us longer term.

There were several things that comprised the 11.5% increase. Part of it was our sales are up 4% and that’s largely driven by new stores and you can account for about one-third of the difference in additional new stores. We had, or I had disclosed, in my portion of the call that we’d put about $50 million year to date in the upgrade. The comparison is actually from the same period last year and we did $120 million in upgrades in fourth quarter of last year, so you add those together and that’s another approximate third. And then we launched the Moog and Wagner conversion, which basically accounts for the remainder, and essentially [partas] is the temporary change we’re in the process of, in with new merchandise. It’ll take a number of months to make the complete conversion, and the combination of these two things, going through the logistical activities of pulling down the replacement merchandise and we also essentially use a certain packaging of products that facilitate in getting a product in efficiently and quickly, but was in excess of what we would reasonably stock over time, and that will melt down over the next several quarters. That, essentially, is about $20 million beyond what we would actually see being offset about $20 million in inventory takeouts through an inventory optimization program we’re working on.

Okay, great, that’s helpful. And then Mike, can you talk about your approach to the buyback here, obviously with the stock being down, but the issues with the credit markets and whatnot, and just the overall volatility of the market. How do you guys think about buy backs today versus maybe about the time of the last call?

So first of all, if we thought the shares were a good buy in the mid thirties, and that’s really the average price we paid year to date, then obviously we think they are a great buy in the twenties. I think some of the things you heard me say before is sure, buybacks are one option for us, and you know, when you’re in a turnaround, you have many options, and as we build out our strategies, we have many different places we can make investments in. Kevin talked about a couple of them as you look up building out commercial, as we build out in our new merchandising systems and things like that. So we have lots of options, and we have to measure share buybacks as an option to the other options we have in the company. What I would tell you that something that has changed is the, you know, we’re in unprecedented times in the economy right now, and I would say one thing that has materially changed is, we want to as a company preserve our liquidity and make sure that during these times we have a strong balance sheet. Today we do have a strong balance sheet and when you look at some of our capital structures, they don’t come due until October 2011, so we feel good about that, but you’re going to probably see us be a little bit more guarded on stock buybacks. As you see we still have $189 million on our $250 million share repurchase, so we’ll continue to look at them on an opportunistic basis.

Okay, that makes sense. And the last question, just the CapEx plan for this year, are we still thinking $170 million to $190 million?

Yes. Still in that range.

Your next question comes from Gregory Melich of Morgan Stanley.

Essentially it was a very positive outcome in the test markets, but to be honest, we did an analysis of all the markets in the country and intentionally selected two markets that were least served with the current process and would reasonably show the best results, even though the results are not what we expect to be indicative for the entire chain, but it was a material improvement and we’re pretty excited.

Obviously you picked the low-hanging fruits first, but to give us any sort of order of magnitude, are we talking hundreds of basis points improvement, or ten?

I think it’s a little early to tell. We, as I mentioned, will begin rolling this out literally in motion changing the planogram changes for early first quarter. I think we’ll have a better sense at the end of first quarter to give you some guidance as this thing has hit a material amount of our product in a material number of stores.

Greg, I think that’s right, I think we need to give it a little more time but you know what, many times when you’re trying to sort out in the beginning, it’s how much of it, Kevin’s point is we did pick some low-hanging fruit, we saw some opportunities there. And there’s a little bit of popcorn effect that happens when you’re first going in, so our learning is give us a quarter or two to confirm, like we did with the inventory upgrades last year, and we’d be happy to talk to you about just where it’s going, but suffice to say, if the initial results are what we’re seeing were applied to the chain, we’d all be thrilled. But we need more time to sort out markets, but we know to just keep moving forward at this point in a pretty ambitious way.

Great. And on the SG&A side, just to follow up, if you look at it from a dollar growth perspective, it was up around 7% year-over-year once we got severance. Looking at it that way, it looks like the new investments were about half of that 7% growth, or maybe a little less.

Let me answer the question in a little bit of a different way. Let me remind you what I said earlier: about two-thirds of our SG&A increase over last year was made up by things we planned to do, so capability investments, new stores… About one-third was related to not adjusting variable expenses, and also some costs we didn’t anticipate, such as hurricanes - we had a little bit of an increase in utilities. But, a different way to think about how we’re approaching SG&A is, last year we were spending about $604,000 per store, and this year we’re about $603,000 a store. So that’s on an SG&A basis. Now when you look at total revenue, we actually have the highest revenue per store amongst our competitors, but it’s interesting when you look at our metric around sales per square foot, we trail the industry. So, we’re producing a lot out of a big box, but on a square foot basis, we lag, and we lag by about 14% to some of our competitors. So we really have a productivity issue, so what we’re trying to do and you heard it in my remarks earlier, is, how do we take the SG&A that we’re spending and repurpose it in more higher productive uses? I gave a couple of examples of that with how do we back down on advertising, and invest in commercial labor and trucks, where we get a higher return? How do we maybe slow down our store growth, which we did up to 2000 and 2008? And how do we actually take that capital and put it into new inventory systems like new merchandising systems that will give us a higher return. So that’s how we’re approaching SG&A and that’s where you hear us talk a little bit about repurposing and we have to invest in the structural parts of our business in order to differentiate us, and I’ll also finish, we also have to be cautious around the trends in our business, around sales, and our mix of SG&A today is about one-fourth variable and three-fourths fixed. So we don’t have a lot of discretion in that variable, so the structural parts of our business, we really have to go in and adjust.

Your final question comes from William J. Keller of FTN Midwest.

Looking in the accounts payable in the finance to accounts payable, which was up roughly $30 million it looks like in the quarter, can you give us an idea, is that all related to the inventory increase, or are vendors gravitating more towards that avenue to get paid? And then also is that the facility capital? Thank you.

Maybe I’ll answer your second question first. You know, our factor in programs, it’s a tough environment out there and we haven’t seen too much of an impact but obviously the crisis in the credit markets has put a little bit of pressure on our ability to factor accounts payable, but we didn’t see any change in that during the third quarter. I think your first question was, of the AP ratio, what’s attributable to inventory and what’s attributable to new terms, and what I would tell you is, it could be about 50/50, in terms of, Kevin talked about our inventory going up and our move into Wagner, that was about $60 million of our inventory increase, and we’re going to have to pay for that at the end of the year. So to give you the context of the numbers, I think we’re trailing along at about 60% right now, coming out of Q3. Last year we finished off the year at 55, if you split the [out price], we’re probably going to be somewhere in between those two numbers as we finish off the year.

So said differently, half is inventory, and half is terms improvement. That’s it. Thank you.

At this time I would like to turn the call back to management for any final comments.

Thank you, Operator, and thanks to our audience for participating on our third quarter earnings conference call. If you have additional questions, please call Joshua Moore at 952-715-5076. Reporters, please contact Shelly Whitaker at 540-561-8452. That concludes our call.

Thank you. This concludes today's conference. Thank you for participating. You may disconnect at this time.