Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by and welcome to the Q3 2019 American Assets Trust, Inc. Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions].I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Mr Adam Wyll. Thank you. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Good morning, everyone. Welcome to American Assets Trust Third Quarter 2019 Earnings Call. Yesterday afternoon, our earnings release and supplemental information were filed on a Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Both are now available on the Investors section of our website, americanassetstrust.com. An audio webcast of this call will also be available for replay by phone over the next week, as well as on the Investors section of our website. During this call, we will discuss non-GAAP financial measures, which are reconciled to our GAAP financial results in our earnings release and supplemental information. We will also be making forward-looking statements based on our current expectations. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties discussed in our SEC filings. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Actual events could cause our results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements, which we undertake no duty to update. And with that, I'll turn the call over to Ernest Rady to begin the discussion of our third quarter results. Ernest?

Thank you. Good morning everyone and thank you all for joining American Assets Trust third quarter 2019 earnings call. We are making great progress on all fronts, as we continue to focus our efforts on earnings growth, combined with growth in net asset value for our shareholders. The Company's Board of Directors has declared a dividend on its common stock of $0.30 per share for the quarterly period ending December 31, 2019, which is a $0.02 per share increase and an approximately 7% increase over the prior quarterly dividend. The dividend will be paid on December 26, 2019 to stockholders of record on December 12, 2019. And we are all delighted to share financially some of the success that we've enjoyed over the last years. I am also pleased to announce that the board has named Adam Wyll as our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. Adam is and has been a valuable member of our management team, and this title better describes the breadth of responsibility he has successfully taken on, and will continue to manage since our IPO, as well as the confidence our Board has in him. And there is no change in reporting function, and he has been a very important part of our management team, and we appreciate what he has done and we look forward to working with them in the future. We are fortunate to have such a great management team and a group of employees of 80, all of whom work together as we continue as a best-in-class real estate investment trust. I'm going to keep my introductory comments short, since Bob is going to introduce our 2020 guidance, which will focus on the growth and resilient strength of our high quality coastal West Coast high barrier to entry portfolios. Again, on behalf of all of us at American Trust, we thank you for your confidence in allowing us to manage your company, and we look forward to your continued support. I will now turn it over to Bob Barton, our Executive Vice President and CFO. Okay Bob, take it from here.

Good morning and thank you, Ernest. Last night we reported third quarter 2019 FFO of $0.57 per share and net income attributable to common stockholders of $0.22 per share for the third quarter. Third quarter results are primarily comprised of the following; first, actual FFO increased in the third quarter by approximately 27% or 11.7% on an FFO per share basis to $0.57 per FFO share compared to the second quarter of 2019, primarily from the following five items. First, the acquisition of La Jolla Commons on June 20 added approximately $0.085 of FFO per share. Second, the Embassy Suites and Waikiki Beach added approximately $0.014 of FFO per share, due to the seasonality over the summer months. Third, The Landmark at One Market in San Francisco added approximately $0.037 of FFO per share, resulting from the lease commencement on July 1st of the remaining five of the seven floors now occupied by Google under their lease agreement that was entered into in Q4, 2018. Fourth, an equal increase in both G&A and interest expense reduced FFO by approximately $0.015 per FFO share. And fifth, a decrease of approximately $0.06 of FFO per share, as a result of the increase in the weighted average shares, resulting from the equity raise, in connection with the acquisition of La Jolla Commons in Q2 of this year. Secondly, as Ernest previously mentioned, we've increased the quarterly dividend by $0.02 per share beginning on December 26 to stockholders of record on December 12, and approximately a 7.1% increase over the prior quarterly dividend. And third, our 2020 guidance range midpoint of $2.42 is approximately a 9% increase over the revised 2019 guidance midpoint. However, excluding 2019, non-recurring termination fees of approximately $5.2 million recorded year-to-date, the majority of which was non-cash. The 2020 guidance…

Thank you.[Operator Instructions]. Our first question comes from [Indiscernible] with Mizuho. Your line is now open.

Hey, good morning gentlemen.

Good morning.

I was wondering if you could talk a bit more about the 2020 guidance. I appreciate the color here, but maybe a bit on some of the factors that you contemplate at the upper end, and then the lower end of the guidance range?

Well, in terms of in terms of the range of the guidance [Indiscernible], I think it's not likely we're going to hit the lower end of the range first of all. But we generally put a range out. Keep in mind we're 15 months out by the end of 2020. So we're making our get our best estimate at this point in time. But from our vantage point today we did -- at least from my perspective is that, I don't think it's likely we're going to hit the lower end of the range, I think we're seeing positive momentum, positive leasing momentum that will give us the opportunity to accomplish the upper end of the range. But there is -- who knows what the future sees in the next 15 months. But we're very positive of the markets that we're in.

Got it, got it, thanks. Maybe a bit more clarity on, the Waikiki falling project, now because the start of the year, you've said a $0.05 of drag. So maybe you could parse out a little bit about what is, I guess the current expectation for the drag in this year, and then what's embedded in the guide for next year. And by the way was that contemplated previously to be completed this year and is now I guess spilling over into next year, or was it always the case with respect to the mid 2020 completion?

It's really spilling over to next year. In Hawaii, things take longer because you have to ship everything to the island. So I would say it's -- our goal initially was to have that finished by the end of Q3 and the furniture is coming from Vietnam -- for the room refresh, there's just a whole lot of logistics and timing trying to get that done. So we are hopeful that by the end of Q2, that we will have this finished. So to answer your question, yes, it's spilling over into 2020.

But if you compare this to comparable jobs, we think we're making very good progress in very good time.

Okay. So -- and then back to I guess the first of all, my question, the full year estimated impact of that -- drive that project this year I guess embedded in that is, how did the hotel perform during the year versus your expectations, when you said it had a $0.05 drag outlook at the start of this year and then maybe quantifying a bit the drag that's embedded within the guidance on an FFO basis for that project next year?

Yes. We've put a reserve at the beginning of the year and part of that may rollover. But what's happened is that, the Embassy Suites hotel, the sweet spot is to run that at about 88%, 87% occupancy, with a RevPAR north of $300 -- significantly north of $300. And what we've experienced is, we've had to increase the occupancy on that and try to make up for that, because the ADR has been reduced somewhat because of the spalling. Keep in mind, when we say spalling, you have scaffolding on the exterior of that building, and when you go to Hawaii, you're on vacation and you don't anticipate opening the curtains and seeing scaffolding out. You expect to see palm trees and water. So we had to adjust the rate. It hasn't been -- the impact to the NOI hasn't been as significant as we thought it was, but there was some adjustments to that.

Okay, fair enough. And then maybe some color on Loma Palisades, the weakness there? Curious if it’s an asset specific, sub-market specific big issue than what seemed to be an otherwise strong multifamily market in Southern California? And then expectations for that asset into next year. Thank you.

Lomas Palisades is in need of a facelift, and we are in the process of providing that. In the meantime, the market has been a bit softer than we would have liked for apartments in San Diego. And we still think it's a great piece of property right overlooking Seaworld, Mission Bay. But it was tired, and it needs some improvement and we're providing that improvement. Abigail, do you want to add something to that? [Indiscernible] Well, it's a great piece of property [Indiscernible] extremely valuable, just in order to maximize the returns from it, we've got to give it a facelift. We've done the roofs. We're starting to work on the landscaping. We've done the plumbing, the sewers and that we're doing it one at a time. And it will happen, then it will be a beautiful property when it's finished. It just needs a facelift.

And just to be clear, is that within your same store multifamily for the next year or that excluded?

I think Bob, do you want to...

Yes. We've not taken that out of same-store. That's still in the same-store.

Got it. Okay. Thank you.

Thank you. And our next question comes from Richard Hill with Morgan Stanley. Your line is now open.

Hey, you've got Ron on for Richard. The first question, just looking at the…

Good morning.

Good morning. Just looking at the investor presentation you guys had out with the potential FFO, it looked like it was $2.45 for 2020. So I guess I'm just wondering, thinking about the guidance for next year and appreciate a lot of the color that you provided. But it feels like it's a little bit conservative, if La Jolla coming in better than expected. And you're going to have sort of a benefit from interest expense as well. Maybe, can you just talk about maybe -- ask that another way, is it possible that that high-end of the range maybe -- may even be too low?

Well there -- first of all, good morning, Ron. There's always that possibility, but keep in mind. So, we had that question from several investors along the way. So during 2019, we've been on the road meeting with investors, and in our presentations through August, we had the bridge, which reflected a midpoint or what we thought was realistic at that time, that we were comfortable with at $2.42. So through eight months of the year, we showed $2.42. In our September presentation, we increased that midpoint -- not midpoint, but we increased that to $2.45 and through our guidance and our budgeting process we rolled it up, and when we take a look at the ranges and the possibilities, we always like to put a range around it, that's just prudent to do when you're 15 months out from the next -- at the end of the next year. So while we are not saying that we can't achieve $2.45, it was more important to have a midpoint that reflected the midway between the rock bottom and the potential weigh up above. And I think the $2.45; we put the upper range at $2.46. I think there is -- we're very positive on the potential in this portfolio. And so it's not to say that we can achieve the $2.45. But we think the right thing to do was, to put the midpoint at $2.42 which is what we had shown throughout most of the year.

If we had our choice of a strategy, it would be under promise and over deliver. In this case, it's our best guess, and we certainly hope to over deliver. But we don't want to make promises to disappoint. Sooner make promises and at least meet them and perhaps exceed the results of that promise.

Great, that's helpful. Maybe can you give an update on what the acquisition environment is like, maybe cap rate assets that you're looking at? What property types look the most interesting to you right now? Thanks.

Ron, there is so much money around, that the value of properties that we look to acquire, has been high, and we had a run at several, mostly office properties. We have come to realize that if you own good office in the path of growth, it can be very significantly profitable. But the competition for quality properties such as ours is intense, that would lead to the conclusion, that what is the value what we have, if what we acquire is so expensive. So, we are very pleased with what we have, and we continue to beat the bushes to try and find more of the same quality with this -- with upside as well.

Great. That's all from my end. Thanks guys.

Thanks.

Thank you, Ron and say hello to Richard.

Yes, sure.

Thanks Ron.

Thank you. And our next question comes from Michael Carroll with RBC Capital Markets. Your line is now open.

Hey guys, it's Jason on for Mike.

Who is on?

Jason on for Mike.

Okay, Jason, say hello to Michael.

Will do. So just wondering, given all the noise around rework, how are you guys feeling about that lease and sales are continuing to fill up the space at 8.30 [ph]?

Yes, we're watching it. I'm not concerned about it. Rework seems to have for path at least a midpoint. We do have security for the lease we have. They continue to work upgrading the building that we provide them. And so we also believe that if, God forbid something happens to reworks that we have an excellent and improved property in a market that has interest in this product. And frankly, I'm not losing any sleep over it. Steve, you're losing any sleep?

No, I can add to that, that it's a 55,000 foot building and they are now marketing 14,000 feet for lease. So they've owned it for -- all the 14,000 foot in six small spaces. So it appears that they are doing very well, even prior to completing TIs. And you asked about the other building, that we're also in the process of beginning to upgrade it. And should we were not to be present for some reason or other.

We'll will manage that ourselves.

That's a seven ton?

Its money well spent, in a market where the demand seems to be there for the project we are producing.

Got it. And then I was also wondering if you guys could just provide an update on the Torrey Point asset and what kind of leasing activity you're seeing there?

Steve, I'm going to leave that to you. We're making some progress, but certainly it has been slower than we'd wished for.

We recently signed a 15,000 foot lease with Neurelis, which is a life science company. They were an existing customer in 3,900 feet and they grew up to 15,000 feet and we've got proposals out for another 12,000feet. So, we're chipping away, and the markets coming in our direction. UTC and Torrey Pines are virtually full. UTC is Class A, Vacancy Direct is 2.3% at the end of Q3. So we're seeing a lot of life science prospects, not only at Torrey Point, but also at Torrey Reserve as well. So the market is improving and we feel good about the future.

It seems to be in the path of the growth and we're hopeful, if not optimistic.

Got it. Okay, thank you guys.

Thank you, Jason.

Thank you. And our next question comes from Mitch Germain with JMP Securities. Your line is now open.

Hi Mitch.

Hey, good morning, how are you?

Good.

So the UTC development, I'm curious where that stands from a planning/entitlement perspective, number one? And then number two, what does it take for you guys to commence it, and then I guess number three, how are you planning to fund it?

Okay. I'm going to ask Jerry Gammieri, who is in charge of that entitlement and he knows the answer, because I ask him that question almost daily.

Good morning, Mitch. We are in the process right now with the City of San Diego to protect our entitlements and submit under the code -- there is a code change coming in 2020. We expect to be into the city this year to basically protect ourselves for the next four years. So we have some runway in front of us, allowing us an opportunity to pre-lease the building before we go to construction, but our hope is to be permit ready by the first quarter of 2020.

Let me just be clear to those people listening is that, the entitlement to build is protected, it's vested. But what Jerry is talking about is that, if you can get into the city of San Diego and get the permit number, then we don't have to do the upgrade in the -- from the 2016 code to the 2020.

Is it an upgrade or just a change, Jerry?

It's a change in code.

It's a change. It's not necessary an upgrade.

Yes.

The change in code leaves more time delays.

But the entitlement is vested.

And then whether we're going to build it, it is much more likely than not we would build, into a market with 3% vacancy. And as the financing goes, as Bob pointed out in his presentation, we have $110 million cash on the balance sheet, and as the time approaches, we will consider other methods of financing.

Yes. Mitch, the cost of that building, I mean we don't -- we haven't been bid it out yet. But just back of the napkin, it's probably -- it's under $200 million from my back of the napkin math, probably $160 million to $180 million somewhere in that range. But it's only like a -- it's less than a 4% expansion of our balance sheet. So it's the right thing, in the right market, in a very low vacancy market in UTC, and that's on the forefront of growth.

We'd like to buy another one just like it.

That sounds that sounds wonderful. So Bob, while I have you, talk to me about from 3Q to 4Q. So it looks like you have a term fee this quarter that comes out of the numbers. So obviously, Forever 21 comes out. How do I get from 3Q to 4Q in terms of the bridge to hit your guidance range?

So you're looking for the bridge going forward to 2020?

Yes. No, I'm just talking about just -- no, I'm talking about from 3Q to 4Q. Just I guess just a couple of negatives in the number right. There's a couple of -- how much was the charge that you took for Forever 21?

We took approximately $250,000, and we did -- actually we got paid for November. I just heard about that this morning. So that maybe a little bit stiff.

I think it's lightly [Indiscernible]

Got you and then -- and then you took a -- and then you have a term fee that you received in the office sector, right?

Term fee, we received about $700,000 in the office sector in Q3.

So netting those two, it's about $500,000 positive, right? Is that comes off?

Approximately, yes.

Yes. And then, is there anything that kind of -- that we should be cognizant of in the 4Q that wasn't in 3Q?

No, nothing, nothing that really sticks out on that. We're on track to hit our midpoint.

Great, thank you.

Thank you, Mitch.

Thank you and our next question comes from Craig Schmidt with Bank of America. Your line is now open.

Good morning Craig.

Hey guys, this is Elvis for Craig. How are you guys doing?

Okay. Good, thanks. Say, hi to Craig for us.

We will. And congratulations to Adam.

Yes. He deserves it.

Just a quick question, because there's a lot of moving pieces in and out of the same-store pool. How should we think about that cash same-store NOI, as you report it, or as you think you will report it call it in the end of 2020 for the entire portfolio?

Well, in the remarks, Elvis, I think we said it was 4% growth in retail and -- is it 14% growth in office. And frankly, when I look at the office into the next couple of years, we're expecting in excess of 10% in the office sector on same-store. I mean, that is a strong sector for us. And then multifamily should be about 3.5%.

So Bob, the 9% includes redevelopment or excludes redevelopment?

It excludes redevelopment.

Okay. So including redevelopment, where would that be trending you think call it, through 2020?

Yes. It's not going to be -- I mean, multifamily isn't impacted. Retail would be impacted slightly. If you look at it what it is today on the supplemental, excluding redevelopment and including it, it's not that -- it's not that big of -- and we break it out in there. So I'll be glad to give you more color on that after the call. But I don't think, it's that big of an impact.

All right. That'd be helpful. And just another question; so as you commence or potentially commenced the La Jolla project, you're going to probably trend to be more than 50% office. How do you think about your diversified portfolio going forward, and will you rebalance in the future with more multifamily or retail or is office sort of the stock that you think you'll have longer term?

What we tell investors, if you guys don't pay me to come to work to build an office, a REIT, a shopping center REIT or a residential REIT, you pay me to build wealth. And if the opportunity to build wealth is in office, we're going to emphasize that. At the same time, we're going to try and build wealth in the other categories too. So we don't think of ourselves as one character only. We think of ourselves as wealth builders. Right now, the opportunity that is in office, and we are fortunate to have been in that to be able to take advantage of those opportunities.

Elvis, just to add to that. I think that's a great way that Ernest has stated about creating wealth. Where we are right now, we're not looking to add retail, we're looking to add office, and multifamily to a lesser extent.

And if you look at this strategy, since we went public over the last eight years, we've increased our dividend every year and our compound return has been -- what 13% or 14% a year. We still apologize for being multi-strategy REIT. I've stopped apologizing because the statistics are -- was good as anybody in the industry and better than the vast majority, and we hope to be able to continue that track record.

Great. Thanks guys.

Thank you, sir.

Thank you. And our next question comes from Todd Thomas with KeyBanc Capital Markets. Your line is now open.

Good morning Todd.

Hi. Good morning. So I just wanted to circle back to acquisitions. You had talked previously about doubling the size of the portfolio over what's now, I guess a four year time-frame, and you commented that it's a competitive environment. But your cost of capital has also improved. So I'm just curious if your appetite has changed then and Bob I'm curious if there is anything in the 2020 guidance for investments or capital raising?

Our appetite hasn't changed. It's a question of the number of calories and the meal we'd have to consume. So we're going to continue to try and achieve those objectives. But we don't have to achieve them to produce superior results. And Bob, do you want to take us through...

Yeah. Hey Todd In the 2020 guidance we've not factored in any acquisitions at all. We're actively looking. Our job is to create value for our shareholders, and that's why we're out looking. We're not looking to get big for the sake of getting big. We're looking to do it accretively and then if we find something and bring it to your attention, it's going to be accretive, its going to be good for every shareholder.

That's well put.

Okay. When you had discussed that plan a couple of quarters ago, what's changed since then? Is it just that there's been some cap rate compression and more capital coming into the markets that you're targeting? What's changed over the last couple of quarters, specifically?

Look nothing has changed, except that we continue to look and we make acquisitions that are significant. To make acquisitions significant is not like going to the grocery store and filling in your basket up with groceries. We've got to find something that makes sense. Bob?

Ye, I think regardless of where we are in the economy, we still underwrite. We're very consistent on our underwriting. We look for unlevered IRRs greater than six. We look -- we focused on NAV and we focus on earnings growth. Earnings growth is really important and we want to make sure it's accretive. I mean you could make an acquisition and get big and you do financial engineering, you could destroy shareholder value or destroy earnings. That's not what we do. And if you look at our history, we've been pretty good at it. The other thing too is that, our cost of capital, which I think you mentioned. We're in a -- we continue to enhance our cost to capital and not everybody is at that vantage point. So I think it's our job to look for those opportunities and we are actively looking.

Okay. And then, going back to the multifamily portfolio, we saw occupancy decrease a little bit more meaningfully in the quarter across the portfolio in Portland as well, not just in San Diego, but you are projecting pretty solid recovery in 2020. And I'm just wondering if you could shed some light on what happened in the quarter, more broadly and what gives you confidence that you'll see the same-store growth materialize that you're forecasting?

Well, Portland has become more competitive. Those are circumstances we don't have any control over. We have excellent product. In San Diego, we have excellent product as well, Loma Palisades needs a facelift as I said earlier, and we're working on that. Pacific Ridge is doing well, and has opportunity for upside. It's a changing [Indiscernible]. You have anything Abigail?

Yes. Just to add a little bit to that. I think we've seen a softening in the county in terms of vacancy rates, and while we think about San Diego being a nice healthy place to live and with healthy occupancy across the Board in San Diego between three star and five star communities, the average vacancy rate is about 5% to 6% and that's pretty comparative to 6% and that's pretty comparative to what we're seeing in the portfolio here in San Diego. So like Ernest said, we're trying to continue building value. We're investing capital in the communities, in hopes that it will continue to target a greater leasing and more occupancy in these communities.

Okay. Are you increasing your use of concessions? Should we expect to see rent start to come down? So far, they've held up pretty well across the multifamily portfolio. But should we expect to see it begin to build a little bit more occupancy in 2020?

We'll do what we can to maximize in the coming year.

Todd, when I think about that, is that you think about the new product that comes online. And for a studio, what I've seen and this is I think in the recent paper, studio going for like $2,700 at which is very expensive. And I think that, the pricing of our product and the quality of our product is in a sweet spot. If you want to thee bedroom, let's say its $4,000 to $4500; its $1,500 a person, which is achievable. But when you start mixing that up, it becomes more expensive, it's tough for a sustainable rent to continue at that higher rate. So I think that our product is priced right, and I think that that growth, we will see it -- continue to see it. I feel positive about our multifamily portfolio here in San Diego. In terms of Portland, we've mentioned on other calls that there is an oversupply of product in multifamily product, in the Lloyd -- not the Lloyd District, but in Portland, and that is slowly being absorbed. And I can't tell you when that's going away. I'm hopefully within the next two years that goes away. But in the meantime, we're staying steady at about 91%.

Okay. And then just last question. I was just wondering if Ernest I missed your prepared remarks at the very beginning of the call. And you're -- I came on right as you were finishing though, and I heard you commenting about, the appointment of Adam to COO. Ernest, you've been in the Chairman, CEO and President seat for several years and the executive management team has been comprised entirely of you and Bob for quite some time now. So I find this announcement interesting. And I'm just curious if you could talk about what this means for AAT? What Adam will focus on with his new responsibilities here, and if there's anything we should read into that announcement?

No. Other than it's a recognition by the Board, that Adam has made a significant contribution and that his role has been more than just Chief Legal Counsel. He has really handled a lot of the operations very well and the Board wanted to acknowledge that with the title. This has never been just Bob and I, it's been Bob and I and all the team in this room, including Adam, who has made a great contribution, he is extremely capable and he has the good fortune of being younger than me. On the other hand, I love what I do, and I'm having fun and if the Board fired me, I don't know what I'd do to have so much fun. So we're going to continue to work together. It's a great team. We're dedicated to build the wealth for all our stockholders. Stick with us Todd.

All right. Great. Thank you.

Thank you.

Thanks Todd.

Thank you. And I'm currently seeing no further questions in the queue. I'd like to turn the call back to -- correction; I do see one further question in the queue. Would you like to take it?

Sure.

All right. Next question comes from Tammi Fique with Wells Fargo Securities. Your line is now open.

Hi.

Hi. Just wondering, the CapEx that you laid out for 2020, does that includes the redevelopment spending that you're planning to do?

The redevelopment at which property? That does not include La Jolla Commons at all.

Okay. But still like the Kmart space at Waikele, like I just -- I guess, I'm just curious to know what -- I'm really just looking for a summary of the capital spending that you expect to do in total for development, redevelopment projects in 2020?

Yes. We have I think about $30 million in there for Kmart redevelopment where we're hopeful that Chris gets the lease signed. And we expect to put probably about $30 million toward that. And then a lot of TIs and leasing commissions on some of the new leases.

Okay, so I guess just in total, what are you expecting to spend for the developments and redevelopments in 2020?

Tammi, I don't have that broken out in front of me. But I'd be glad to answer that offline.

Okay, great. And then just wondering if you could talk a little bit more about the opportunity in the Forever 21 space, you mentioned renovating that space. I'm wondering if you will replace that tenant with another apparel tenant, or is there a better use, is there expansion potential, just wondering if you could elaborate there a little bit?

Sully, who handles that is stirring, which means that he wants to answer the question. Chris, am I correct that you would like to answer that question?

Hi, Tammi. So you know that Forever 21 is on a 20,000 feet of ground floor and 40,000 feet of the second former Mervyns building in Del Monte Center. So as we look to break up that box and space, it will be probably a combination of what I would say a more typical mall tenants and also a combination of some entertainment pieces there.

And we are in the process of...

Yes, we've been working on this for about a year probably now.

Okay. Got it. And then do you think that rents there will go up relative to what Forever 21 was spending? Yes, I'm sorry -- the Forever 21 rent there?

I'm going to say. I certainly hope so, Forever 21, is on a gross lease. So I've got to compute it back to get my triple nets and the rest of it. But I hope to do better.

And then just last question, I mean it looks like in the most recent investor presentation, the FFO estimates for 2021 and 2022 were eliminated, and I'm just curious why you decided to take that out?

What we are doing is just getting ready for our guidance report on this earnings call. So what we're doing just focusing in on 2019 and 2020 and as we get into 2020, what we'll do is, we hope to give you more information on that. The information that we put, was not fully baked, because we only put out what we knew at that point in time. What we do know, is that there is growth. And so as we get a clearer picture, we will share it with you as we have consistently in the past.

Okay, great. Thank you.

Thanks, Tammi.

Thank you. And I'm showing no further questions in the queue at this time. I'd like to turn the call back to Ernest Rady for any closing remarks.

Okay. Thanks all of our stockholders and the representatives for allowing us to have so much fun. It's really fun for us to create the wealth we've been able to create for our stockholders over the last eight years, and we hope, the next years are as fruitful. And thank you for your confidence.

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.