Good morning, and welcome to the AECOM Fourth Quarter 2017 Earnings Conference Call. I would like to inform all participants, this call is being recorded at the request of AECOM. This broadcast is the copyrighted property of AECOM and any rebroadcast of this information in whole or part without the prior written permission of AECOM is prohibited. As a reminder, AECOM is also simulcasting this presentation with slides at the Investors section at www.aecom.com. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session. I'd like to turn the call over to Will Gabrielski, Vice President, Investor Relations.

Thank you, operator. I would like to direct your attention to the Safe Harbor statement on page 1 of today's presentation. Today's discussion contains forward-looking statements about future growth and financial expectations. Actual results may differ significantly from those projected in today's forward-looking statements due to various risks and uncertainties, including the risks described in our periodic reports filed with the SEC. Except as required by law, we take no obligation to update our forward-looking statements. We are using non-GAAP financial measures in our presentation. The appropriate GAAP financial reconciliations are incorporated into our presentation, which is posted on our website. Please note that all percentages refer to year-over-year progress, except as noted. Our discussion of earnings results and guidance excludes the impact of acquisition and integration related expenses, one-time financing charges, the amortization of intangible assets, and financial impacts associated with non-core businesses and assets, unless otherwise noted. Today's discussion of organic growth is on a year-over-year and constant currency basis. Beginning today's presentation is Mike Burke, AECOM's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.

Thank you, Will. Welcome, everyone. Joining me today are Troy Rudd, our Chief Financial Officer; and Randy Wotring, our Chief Operating Officer. I will begin with an overview of AECOM's results and discuss the trends across our business. Then, Troy will review our financial performance and outlook in greater detail, before turning the call over for a question-and-answer session. Please turn to slide 3. We began the year with substantial momentum and delivered on numerous key financial and strategic objectives. First, we delivered 9% revenue growth in the fourth quarter, which marked our highest quarterly growth in several years and contributed to full year growth of 4%. All three segments grew in the fourth quarter, including double-digit growth in Building Construction and Power and growth in our Americas Design business. Second, we delivered record wins of $23 billion and our backlog increased by 11% to a new all-time high of nearly $48 billion. This performance was led by our higher margin MS and DCS segments and included double-digit growth in our Americas Design business, where we are capitalizing on improving market trends. Third, we had another year of exceptional free cash flow, which was consistent with our expectations. We have now paid down approximately $1.5 billion of debt over the past three years, continue to invest in growth and expanded our AECOM Capital portfolio. Fourth, we announced a new capital allocation policy in September, built on the confidence we have in our five-year financial forecast, including $3.5 billion of cumulative free cash flow. This policy, which includes achieving net leverage of 2.5 times and a new $1 billion stock repurchase authorization, underscores our commitment to creating substantial shareholder value. Finally, our design, build, finance and operate capabilities are creating meaningful competitive advantages. There is no more apparent than in our…

Thanks, Mike. Please turn to slide 6. Our results highlighted a number of accomplishments, including solid performance across the business, accelerated revenue growth in the second half of the year, and positive growth in all three segments in the fourth quarter. Adjusted EPS in the fourth quarter was $0.74, and our EPS for the year was within our guidance range. During the quarter, we drove strong outperformance on tax, which offset some of the market challenges Mike spoke to. Importantly, we generated $618 million of free cash flow, which was within our annual guidance range for the third consecutive year and include a very strong performance in the fourth quarter. Our consistently strong cash performance is a result of our diverse business model and culture focused on driving cash flow. Importantly, our backlog and revenue momentum solidify our confidence in our 2018 outlook. Please turn to slide 7. Revenue in the DCS segment increased by 4% in the quarter, including growth in the Americas Design business despite the U.S. hurricanes. This strength was led by our transportation and water businesses, where both revenue and backlog increased by double-digits. We also had growth in our international markets with large transportation projects ramping up across both Asia-Pacific and EMEA regions. The full year adjusted operating margin of 5.9% was consistent with our expectations. Underlying execution was strong and we increased business development investments to capitalize on substantial market opportunities. These investments contributed to our record backlog in the Americas and underpinned our confidence in continued growth in 2018. We expect margins to exceed our 6% target, especially as volumes accelerate during the year. Please turn to slide 8. Revenue in the Construction Services segment increased by 21% for the quarter and 11% for the full year. The full year adjusted operating margin…

Thank you. And our first question comes from Michael Dudas from Vertical Research. Please go ahead.

Good morning, gentlemen.

Good morning, Mike.

Mike.

Michael, as you think about business development for 2018, where do you, from a board and from executive management level, see the best opportunities not only to kind of achieve and continue the growth in 2018, but maybe even looking forward to 2019 and 2020, maybe start with the Design business than more so on the Management Services side where I think there's could be continued visibility?

Sure. Let me start off, I'll talk about the DCS and CS and Randy will talk about MS. So, first of all, based on what we saw in the fourth quarter, 9% organic growth, the highest growth we've seen in many, many years as well as the 1.2 book-to-burn ratio gives us a lot of confidence that the momentum is increasing. And so, as we start to see momentum increasing, of course, we're seeing that because we have invested over the past year in business development activity and we're going to continue to invest in business development activity. But when you say where are some of the hot markets, you've heard us mention some of the recent ballot measures and some of the hot markets that we've seen like Los Angeles, Seattle, San Francisco and Atlanta. If I look at just those four markets alone, we are expecting about $20 billion in bids to be put out to the market in the next 12 months alone, just in those four markets. So, we are seeing some incredible strength in some of these markets. The U.S. infrastructure market really gives us some real confidence. And so, we're starting to see while we've had great growth in Construction Services three years in a row of double-digit organic growth, now we're starting to see the growth come back to the DCS and the MS segments, our two highest margin segments. And so, it's not only growth, but it's growth in the right segments and we feel pretty good about the U.S. infrastructure market, the construction markets. We have long been benefiting from the uptick in the vertical construction markets in New York City, but we have diversified outside of that market into many other regions with you've heard us mention the win in London for the second tallest building in London, you've heard us mention the five other markets outside of New York in the U.S. where we have over $1 billion of construction revenue. So, overall, we feel good about the construction markets growing outside of New York and we feel good about the infrastructure markets. I'll let Randy comment about Management Services.

Thanks, Mike. We ended the year with about $50 billion in pipeline and $20 billion of decisions expected in the year and we delivered substantial growth. We had a strong success in converting the pipeline to wins and MS backlog actually increased by nearly 50%. Of the $20 billion in decisions, we anticipate we won about $8 billion or 40% of the pursuits. And importantly, as Mike indicated beyond this success, we still have a qualified bid pipeline of over $30 billion, which reflects our investment, the backfill of the pipeline with new opportunities. And beyond that, I think if you look at the defense spending trends, the outlook across defense and intelligence markets remains robust. And the President's 2018 budget calls for a 10% increase over FY 2017 budget levels, and so we're talking budgets well over a $0.5 trillion. It's a very large market and growing, and AECOM is able to address an increasing amount of the programs that are put out for bid. And there's also a growing pipeline internationally and governments all over the world are signaling increased defense budgets. And recently, we saw the Saudi Arabia deal or agreement with the U.S. that adds to our confidence that higher global defense spending is going to be in place. So we feel bullish about the pipeline opportunities in the MS marketplace.

Thank you, Mike and Randy. Mike, just my quick follow up would be, when you're talking about your $25 million restructuring that you expect to hit in Q1, is that just for those underperforming businesses you highlighted, Mike, in the quarter or is there something more general to those numbers and where you're starting to target, maybe some tightening of the belt?

Yeah, I'll let Randy answer that, if that's okay?

Yeah. Following several years of integration and a pivot to external growth focus, we see a few areas that could see some fine tuning and pruning to drive efficiency in how we operate and deliver work. We're always looking for ways to improve the efficiency with which we operate and deliver work. We're focused on positioning the company best for 2018 and beyond, and very much focused on delivering growth and having a highly efficient cost structure. So look, I think included in the guidance this year is approximately $20 million to $25 million of expense. This will primarily accrue to the DCS business with a little bit in CS, where we've reorganized a few businesses to reflect the overall lower business volumes. And you may recall for instance, as Mike mentioned in prepared remarks, we went from having a few large industrial jobs to none following the election last year and NAFTA concerns. So you may recall, we've talked about pressures on our U.S. government environmental business due to weak oil prices or realigning the cost structure there. And if not for that, environmental market pressure in Americas DCS, we would have had positive organic growth for the year.

Excellent. Thanks, gentlemen. Appreciate it.

Our next question comes from Andrew Kaplowitz from Citi. Please go ahead.

Hi. Good morning, guys. It's Alan Fleming on for Andy this morning.

Okay. Morning.

Good morning.

Mike, I want to come back to the MS backlog, which is 50% growth there is a great result. But I think you had talked about doubling MS backlog this year and it does look like you lost one significant re-compete in the quarter. So how much of it is – if at all, does this impact your ability to generate 5% organic growth in 2018 and beyond? And can you talk about any protests that you filed on the re-compete that you lost and maybe your confidence in being successful there?

Yeah. I'll let Randy respond to that, but it's a – this could be the first time in the history where 50% increase in backlog is not enough to satisfy, but I'll let Randy jump into that one.

Yeah. Let me talk about the – I think you're referring to the Savannah River job at the Department of Energy and we're extremely disappointed by that initial decision. You know, our team has performed very well. They're a very high performance force for years and our record is unmatched in the industry relative to our ability to safely treat and dispose of radioactive waste. We're very selective in what we protest and we'll only move forward with a protest when we believe that an agency has not followed its evaluation criteria or applicable procurement negotiations regulations. We do not believe that the DOE award decision was consistent with the RFP evaluation criteria or applicable procurement regulations. Now although protests turn on their individual facts and circumstances, we have a strong record of successfully utilizing the protest process when necessary. So thus, we have filed our bid protest, as well as others with the Government Accountability Office. Now look, we still are very bullish on growth. We still have a full pipeline and from time to time, we will lose contracts, we should win contracts, we should lose, but we're very bullish that we are continuing to win above industry average and we have visibility on pipeline that will provide growth well into the future.

I appreciate that, Randy. And maybe sticking with MS, I think you guided, I think you said 7% margin there for 2018, but you've done quite a bit better than that the last several years. So, is this just some conservatism on your part kind of given the variability of the performance enhancement fees there and can you do better than that in 2018 if you continue to execute well?

Hey. So, this is Troy. I'll take that question. So, our guide this year and our guide for next year has been a 7% margin for the MS business. And I think we said this in the prepared comments that, that excludes any award fees or any significant performance fees that we would earn in the year. So, as we move forward into 2018, our guidance is built around that 7% operating margin and we do see upside in the business as we move forward into 2018 and beyond that.

Okay. Thank you, guys. I'll hand it over.

Our next question comes from Steven Fisher from UBS. Please go ahead.

Thanks. Good morning. Mike, over the last few years, there have been some false starts on the Americas Design business. One quarter it starts to look good and then it starts to fade. How are the dynamics that you're seeing this time different, and I would guess you're going to say it has to do with some of the state level funding initiatives. And if that's the case, how do you kind of think about the Federal side of things?

So, listen, we have been participating in a difficult environment in the U.S. infrastructure market for quite some time and if you look at the revenue growth, the backlog growth, anything else relative to our peer group, we have considerably outperformed our peer group. Our backlog is up 12% and our book-to-burn rate is up in the key markets of water and transportation all up double-digit numbers. We're feeling pretty good about that momentum. We're feeling good about our execution. We're feeling good about the investments in business development we've made in targeted markets and we're feeling good about that $20 billion I mentioned coming to market in the next 12 months in just those four markets of Seattle, San Francisco, L.A. and Atlanta, all markets where we have a very strong presence. And so, I don't know if you call it a false start or you just call – we've been participating in a shrinking market for a number of years. We have taken market share in that period of time and our backlog now pretends quite well for FY 2018 and forward.

Okay. And I don't know if I missed it, but can you give us an idea of what you're assuming for overall organic revenue growth in 2018? And then how the individual segments, kind of some color around how they would relate to above or below that overall target?

So, we have not given guidance specifically for FY 2018 on revenue, but we have given long-term guidance of 5% organic growth in revenue over the next five years CAGR. We've given guidance of 10% growth in earnings over that five-year period of time. And we will be updating that guidance in our December Investor Day and I think everything we're seeing is a positive to those expectations. The momentum feels better than it did a year ago. So, you can read into that what you'd like, but we haven't given specific revenue guidance on FY 2018.

Okay. Maybe I'll just ask you about cash flow then. What do you think your cash taxes are going to be in 2018 and what are the big puts and takes to free cash flow year-over-year in 2018 versus 2017?

This is Troy. I'll take that question. So, in terms of cash taxes, we would see a profile similar to the current year, which means that we would expect to have a tailwind from our cash taxes. At the moment, I don't have a specific guide to give you on that – only that's my expectation it would be similar to the prior year. We also don't have any legal settlements that we anticipate to pay out during the current year. If you recall in this past year, we had an unplanned payout of about $60 million. We also don't have any legal settlements or expected payouts in the coming year. But putting that all aside, the underlying business hasn't dramatically changed. We still have a diversified portfolio of projects. We still have an incentive system that rewards people for cash performance. And if you look back at the last three years, we've been pretty consistent. We've generated $2 billion of free cash flow in the last three years, and it's all been consistent from year-to-year. So I just see the underlying performance of the business delivering cash flows as it (32:17) has in the past.

Terrific. Thanks very much.

Our next question comes from Andy Wittmann from Baird. Please go ahead. Andrew John Wittmann - Robert W. Baird & Co., Inc.: Great. Thanks for taking my questions, and good morning.

Good morning. Andrew John Wittmann - Robert W. Baird & Co., Inc.: I guess I wanted to specifically ask about the burn rate to start out with, particularly in the DCS and MS segments. I guess over the last few years, it slowed down a little bit, but just a little bit more visibility, could you talk about how you expect the burn rate to trend in those two segments in particular?

Yeah. Andy, it's Troy again. So if you just – just at a high level, our backlog year-over-year is up 11%. And so, just given the nature of some of the projects in the Management Services business we see that extending for Management Services, so the burn rate is, as you described, and I'm assuming you're talking about the conversion from backlog to revenue. Andrew John Wittmann - Robert W. Baird & Co., Inc.: Yeah.

So we do see that lengthening, but we do see growth in that particular business year-over-year. Our Construction Services profile really is the same. So we are excepting again that business to grow. We haven't given guidance yet, we will at our Investor Day specifically around that business. We do see that grow. In our Design business, I don't see a discernible change in the profile of that business, so we have seen the backlog grow in our DCS business, a little more than 10% and we would expect it to translate into revenue in 2018, at the same rate that it's translated to in the past. Andrew John Wittmann - Robert W. Baird & Co., Inc.: Great. Thanks. I guess my next question I wanted to dig in a little bit more about, kind of the overall industry utilization rates and the impact that it might be having on your pricing or terms and conditions. Unemployment is really low, broadly speaking but I don't know if it's low for your employee base. Is there enough of a scarcity factor here that you're able to get better pricing or terms and conditions or do you expect that 2018 will be similar to 2017?

We're expecting 2018 to be similar to 2017 in terms of margins. We have given our margin guidance and we're not expecting labor pools or labor issues to impact that except for the fact that we get operating leverage and the more we grow our revenue, the more of a positive impact it has on our margin. So, we are not concerned about labor scarcity in the type of work we're doing or in the locations that we are doing in any way that would negatively impact margins. Andrew John Wittmann - Robert W. Baird & Co., Inc.: Great. And then I guess my last question is probably for Randy and that just has to do with the Federal environment. And Randy, if you could just remind us which of your re-competes are up in 2018 for the Federal? I think it's Los Alamos and Hanford, but maybe I'm wrong on that, maybe if there's any others that we should be monitoring that will be helpful to know? Thank you.

Yeah. I think there's nothing unusual about what we have next year. I think in fact, it's no major re-competes that are up other than those that we've started in fiscal year 2017. So, I know of no major re-competes. We have a smaller contract I guess with DOE at the National Energy Technology Laboratory, where we've been for a large number of years, but nothing major. Andrew John Wittmann - Robert W. Baird & Co., Inc.: Okay. Thank you.

I will say that we still consider the Savannah River site competition to be open and not closed. So, from that standpoint, it's a major re-compete that's out there. Andrew John Wittmann - Robert W. Baird & Co., Inc.: Fair enough. Thank you.

Our next question comes from Chad Dillard from Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead.

Hi. Good afternoon, guys.

Hello, Chad.

Chad.

I just want to touch on the $20 million to $25 million in restructuring, just want to understand, how big of a benefit that will be and then how should we think about the timing to when that benefit will reach the eventual run rate? And then, also just related to your 2018 guidance, how much of that cost savings benefit is included and how much if at all you are including a non-recurring tax benefits for 2018?

Chad, I'm sorry I missed the very last part of your question. If you could repeat that, please.

Just how much if at all you're including for non-recurring tax benefits in 2018?

Okay. So, I'm going to answer that one first. In our 21% rate that we're guiding to, we do expect a benefit of restructuring in the first quarter. Other than that, we don't anticipate anything in subsequent quarters. But that is baked into our 21% rate. In terms of the overall restructuring, first of all, it is included in our $2.70 guidance. And we expect that to go through our results in the first quarter. And the restructuring will take place in the first quarter and some of it in the beginning of the second quarter. And in 2018, in terms of the impact, we see a very modest impact in the full year result. But once we get through that, we see a more permanent and lasting impact in fiscal 2019 and beyond.

Got it. And then just switching over to Management Services, you mentioned that you have about $16 billion in your pipeline over the next 12 months, and I understand that this business can be pretty lumpy. But in terms of what you're seeing in terms of visibility, I mean do you expect that $16 billion to be more first half weighted versus second half weighted. And then, also maybe you can speak to the level of visibility that you're seeing in the international portion of Management Services. I think one of your peers today mentioned that they're seeing a slowdown, I think UK Ministry of Defence, and I just want to get a sense for are you seeing this as well and if there is or how big of an impact would that be to your business?

Yeah. I have to tell you to predict the timeframe when the government is going to make awards is very difficult now, but – so I would tell you that most of the pipeline that exists where we expect awards in 2018 will be spread over the year. We've seen delays – there was a question earlier about we haven't won as much as we thought we would is because some of those awards were delayed and kicked over into fiscal year 2018. So the timing on awards is hard to predict. I just tell you that we expect that those will occur – you know, spread over the year. With regard to international activities, we are seeing a tick-up in opportunities in India. And we do see some nuclear-related opportunities in the UK, although we've seen some of the same slowdown in the UK Defence Department, but we're not necessarily impacted by that in fiscal year 2018.

Great. Thank you, guys.

Our next question comes from Jamie Cook from Credit Suisse. Please go ahead. Jamie L. Cook - Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC: Hi, good morning. I guess a couple of – or good afternoon, depending what time zone.

Hi, Jamie. Jamie L. Cook - Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC: I guess a couple of questions. One, back to the Management Services business, Mike, you've been very successful, you talk about your backlog being up 50% year-over-year. But I'm just trying to think through how that – you know, when – I mean you said revenues would be up and that you'd assume a 7% margin or so for MS services. At what point do you expect on a profit dollar basis that your Management Services business can grow over year (40:26)? Is that more of a 2019 scenario or could we see that in 2017? My second question is with regards to the $20 million to $25 million restructuring. Do we see this as sort of the last year sort of restructuring or should we think about that as sort of an ongoing improvement that we'll do to continue to streamline the business? And then my third question is on the – your longer term financial targets. Based on what you're seeing and I know we want to wait till the Analyst Day, but should we now assume you think you can do that your 10% EPS growth target, you could potentially do better than that with now your share repurchase in place because I didn't think before you assume share repurchases when you talked about your 10% EPS growth target?

Okay. I think I got all three of those down. So, let me start with our expectations are for us in the MS segment to see growth in 2018. So... Jamie L. Cook - Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC: Profit dollar. Profit dollar growth.

Yes, yes.

Yeah. Jamie L. Cook - Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC: Okay.

We expect profits to increase in the MS operating segment in 2018 and of course in 2019 and forward. Secondly, on the restructuring, when you say is this something – are we done with it or is this something that, well, there's more to come. You know I think any business of our size with $18 billion of revenue, we ought to be looking every year at what things we can prune so that we can grow and we don't see any other restructuring charges planned for 2018 certainly after this. But you know, I wouldn't rule out us in the future looking to prune businesses based on market conditions. We saw a downturn in the Oil & Gas environmental engineering business that causes to restructure around that and a few other small areas. So I think that's just normal and healthy. With regard to your third question, our long-term financial targets when we put them out last year did not include share repurchases. And so I think you know, how to interpret that comment and we'll have more to say about that in the December Analyst Day, but we still feel very confident in our five-year growth in our cash flow projections. With cash flow, you heard Troy mention, we had $2 billion of free cash flow over the last three years and you could straight line that right to our five-year cash flow projections that we've given and so we think there's upside to that. And the recent organic growth rates gave us confidence. We set out a five-year 5% organic growth target. We hit 4% in FY 2017 with 9% in Q4, so we like the trajectory of that, we like the trajectory of our win rates and all of that gives us some real confidence in the direction of that business. Jamie L. Cook - Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC: Okay. Thank you. I'll get back in queue.

Our next question comes from Bobby Burleson from Canaccord. Please go ahead.

Yeah. Good morning.

Good morning.

This is just a couple of quick ones. Just wondering on this China, U.S. energy agreements that's kind of a verbal agreement right now, talking about $83 billion in shale gas and chemical investment in the West Virginia area, wondering how your midstream engineering business is positioned there, whether or not you think there's some meaningful potential uptake in projects coming and what the timeframe might be? I know it's early.

Yeah. It's just simply too early to tell on that, but it's obviously an area that we would have an interest in it in some capacity, but too early to tell at this point.

Okay. And then, nuclear decommissioning. Just wondering if some of the rule making changes that are in process could actually speed up the pace of additional projects coming your way or whether or not you think that that's not really a core issue. I understand there is some – you know, trying to lower costs during the decommissioning phase by lowering personnel requirements. Is that something you see as a significant move that might be happening soon?

So, yeah, the nuclear decommissioning opportunity is a big opportunity, you've heard us mention before. We think that's a $200 billion market. Clearly, the San Onofre win was the first big one that we were able to compete very well on given our new combined capabilities. It was a real test case for us to bring together our extensive power, construction expertise, our environmental engineering expertise and most importantly, our Federal government nuclear decommissioning expertise and put all that together and I think it was a real testament to the value of our integrated delivery model that allow us to win that project. And I think it positions us incredibly well for nuclear decommissioning, not just here in the United States and all the regulatory loosening around that, but Canada has an enormous nuclear decommissioning opportunity. We've been spending time in Japan where they're going to take down 35 reactors, we've been spending time in Taiwan where they're going to take down a large reactor. So, I think we are positioned as well as anybody to benefit from that $200 billion market.

Thanks.

Sure.

Our next question comes from Tahira Afzal from KeyBanc. Please go ahead.

Hi folks. Congrats on a good job...

Hi, Tahira.

...given the storms.

Thank you, Tahira.

I guess my first question, you've talked a bit about all the – or hinted at all the cushions as you look out into your 2018 guidance. Would love to get a little more color in terms of what you presumed around the interest expense in terms of debt reduction?

Yeah, Tahira, it's Troy. So again what we've assumed is that, we're going to apply substantially all of our cash to paying down debt during fiscal 2018. Now the profile of the business is typically that debt pay down in this past year comes in the second half of the year. So we have interest expense coming down during the course of the year. But as you can see in the interest guide, it comes down when you just look at the rate that we've applied, it comes down in the second half of the year. And so, it's down a few pennies during the course of the year in our guidance. And I will also remind you that, as a result of the bond offering we did successfully in February, we now have more than 90% of our debt being fixed. So, even if we see a rise in interest rates over the course of this year, we're relatively immune to the impact of that.

Perfect. Thanks. And I guess as a follow-up, Mike, you talked a bit about the NEOM city proposed, seems more like a whole state by the size of that. But you know I guess would love to get your thoughts, you've seen the King Abdullah Initiative sort of yield mixed results in the past. How real do you think this is, based on what you've learned so far, and then the timeline? And if you roughly break it out, it means there is around $35 billion, $40 billion in spending every year going on for a decade. So what could it be your scope as an opportunity within that?

Yeah, Tahira, I had the good fortune of being in Riyadh just two weeks ago and participating in many meetings about the NEOM project, about the new Red Sea tourism projects, and as well as the infrastructure growth of the region. And I'll tell you, I really felt like it was history in the making without being overly dramatic. I've never felt more hope for the country of Saudi Arabia than I did on that trip with the moderation of the cultural issues in the country that are causing many foreigners to invest into Saudi, that's causing them to bring technology and innovation, talent and tourism to the country. And I think as they make their shift away from their dependency on oil, there's a lot of opportunities for companies like us to help them develop industry tourism and infrastructure for many, many years to come. So we feel really good about that. We feel really good about our position there. We have 700 or so employees on the ground now. And I think you're going to see a lot of bright things coming from that country.

Okay. Thanks a lot, Mike.

Sure.

This concludes the question-and-answer session. I'll now turn the call back over to Mike Burke for closing remarks.

Thank you, operator. So, listen, hopefully what you take away from this call is that we're really excited about what 2018 holds in store for us. We delivered on growth in FY 2017. We finished with 9% organic growth in the fourth quarter, and we expect to continue that growth in 2018. But more importantly, we're seeing growth come back to the higher margin segments, and we're starting to see an overall mix shift to higher margin work. And we're also seeing that our design, build, finance and operate strategy is truly creating a competitive differentiation that's driving success on many very large pursuits. And so, that coupled with another robust cash flow year in FY 2017 and you heard us mention it a couple of times that we've delivered on $2 billion of free cash flow since 2015, and all of that gives us incredible confidence in our five-year growth in cash flow projections. And we're hoping to continue this dialog at our Investor Day on December 12 in New York and we'll be talking more about our strategy and a more detail look at our capital allocation plan. So, thank you for your continued interest and hopefully, we'll see you in December. Bye now.

Thank you, ladies and gentlemen. This concludes today's call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.