Good morning. Thank you for standing by. Welcome to Accenture's Second Quarter Fiscal 2026 Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Alexia Quadrani, Managing Director and Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you, operator, and thanks, everyone, for joining us today on our second quarter 2026 earnings announcement. As the operator just mentioned, I'm Alexia Quadrani, Executive Director and Head of Investor Relations. On today's call, you will hear from Julie Sweet, our Chair and Chief Executive Officer; and Angie Park, our Chief Financial Officer. We hope you've had an opportunity to review the news release we issued a short time ago. Let me quickly outline the agenda for today's call. Julie will begin an overview of our results. Angie will take you through the financial details, including the income statement and balance sheet, along with some key operational metrics for the second quarter. Julie will then provide a brief update on our market positioning before Angie provides our business outlook for the third quarter and full fiscal year 2026. We will then take your questions before Julie provides a wrap-up at the end of the call. Some of the matters we'll discuss on this call, including our business outlook, are forward-looking and as such are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to those factors set forth in today's news release and discussed in our annual report on Form 10-K and the quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and other SEC filings. These risks and uncertainties could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed on this call. During our call today, we will reference certain non-GAAP financial measures, which we believe provide useful information for investors. We include reconciliations from non-GAAP financial measures where appropriate to GAAP in our news release or in the Investor Relations section of our website at accenture.com. As always, Accenture assumes no obligation to update the information presented on this call. Now, let me turn the call over to Julie.

Thank you, Alexia, and everyone joining us this morning, and thank you to our more than 786,000 people for your extraordinary work. We delivered another strong quarter with $18 billion of revenue, growing 4% in local currency and once again taking significant market share. We had record bookings of $22.1 billion, bringing H1 bookings to a total of $43 billion. We had a record 41 clients with quarterly bookings greater than $100 million, bringing us to 74 of these bookings in the first half, 12 more than this time last year, demonstrating the continued demand for reinvention at scale. We delivered 30 basis points of operating margin expansion with strong EPS growth year-over-year, generating significant free cash flow while investing significantly in our business. We closed 3 strategic acquisitions, deploying $1.6 billion of capital, and we now expect to deploy $5 billion in acquisitions this year with capacity to do more for the right opportunities. In double-clicking on our revenue, our revenue growth was broad-based across geographic markets and types of work. Revenue from our top 10 ecosystem partners continues to outpace our overall growth, and we are expanding these partnerships. And we are on track in FY '26 to more than double our bookings over FY '25 from partnerships with our key emerging AI and data ecosystem partners. And we delivered these strong results through the disciplined execution of our growth strategy as our market remains roughly the same. Our long-term growth strategy is to help our clients reinvent and to capture other new opportunities created by AI. To accelerate this strategy, we are using 2 key competitive advantages: our strong balance sheet and our long history of successful acquisitions. Our goal with acquisitions is to more rapidly expand into higher growth areas with attractive margins, which will fuel…

Thank you, Julie, and thanks to all of you for joining us on today's call. We were very pleased with our second quarter results with record bookings for the quarter, revenue at the top end of our guided range, strong margin expansion and robust free cash flow. These results demonstrate the resilience and durability of our business and continued execution of our strategy to be the reinvention partner for our clients. We delivered these results while continuing to invest for long-term market leadership and returning significant cash to shareholders. Now, let me summarize a few highlights for the quarter. Revenues grew 4% in local currency and were broad-based across geographic markets and types of work, reflecting the diversity of our business as we continue to take market share. Operating margin was 13.8%, an increase of 30 basis points compared to Q2 results last year and continues to include significant investments in our business and our people. We delivered EPS in the quarter of $2.93, which represents 4% growth compared to EPS last year. And finally, we delivered strong free cash flow of $3.7 billion and returned $2.7 billion to shareholders through repurchases and dividends this quarter. We also invested $1.6 billion, primarily attributed to 3 acquisitions in the quarter. With those high-level comments, let me turn to some of the details starting with new bookings. New bookings were a record $22.1 billion for the quarter, representing 6% growth in U.S. dollars and 1% growth in local currency, with an overall book-to-bill of 1.2. Consulting bookings were $11.3 billion with a book-to-bill of 1.3. Managed Services bookings were $10.8 billion with a book-to-bill of 1.2. Within bookings, the percentage of our work, which is fixed price, continues to increase over 60% in FY '25. This reflects the rising importance of our…

Thank you, Angie. I will start with the demand environment and then turn to why we see AI as a tailwind, which we believe will shape our growth over the next few years. We saw, again, this quarter clients continuing to prioritize their most strategic and large-scale transformational programs, which positions us in the center of their reinvention agendas. As clients finalize their budgets going into calendar year 2026, we are seeing spending similar to 2025. Demand continues to be driven by a few major themes. First, clients are implementing foundational programs with our ecosystem partners to capture the full opportunity of AI. These typically involve cloud, security and data modernization, often combined with operating model and talent transformation. We continue to see at least 1 out of every 2 advanced AI projects lead to a data project. Second, clients continue to look to reinvent faster, leverage our proprietary platforms and expertise and achieve greater efficiencies through managed services across the enterprise, and we see clients working with us to create more investment capacity to increase their spend in new areas. And third, clients with more advanced digital cores are starting to take on larger AI programs. We also are seeing more moving from proof of concept to production, while others are still at the beginning of their journey with another 100 clients or so initiating advanced AI projects with us this quarter. Across many of these programs, AI and data are now central, sometimes as the destination and increasingly as part of the work from day 1. A good example of these demand trends is how we are partnering with the Estée Lauder Companies, a global prestige beauty company, to advance its new one operating ecosystem and to drive a more connected, scalable and consumer-centric enterprise. Enabled by our…

Thanks, Julie. Before I get into our business outlook, I want to share how the conflict in the Middle East is affecting our business and how we are reflecting it in our guidance. First, we have roughly 3,000 colleagues in the Middle East, a region which represented about 1% or $1 billion of revenue in FY '25. Our colleagues are safe, and we are providing them with all the support we can. Currently, we are not seeing any significant financial impact. While we know the environment is more uncertain given the conflict, we always call it like we see it. And based upon the information we have today, we are increasing key elements of our full year guidance. Our range for Q3 and the full year reflect our best view today of the potential impact of the conflict in H2. It does not take into account a significant escalation or the occurrence of major economic disruption. Now, let me turn to our business outlook. For the third quarter of fiscal '26, we expect revenues to be in the range of $18.35 billion to $19 billion. This assumes the impact of FX will be approximately positive 2.5% compared to the third quarter of fiscal '25. Our Q3 guidance reflects an estimated 1% to 5% growth in local currency, including about a 1% impact from our Federal business. Excluding the impact of Federal, our revenue is expected to be an estimated 2% to 6%. For the full fiscal '26, based upon how rates have been trending over the last few weeks, we continue to assume the impact of FX on our results in U.S. dollars will be approximately positive 2% compared to fiscal '25. For the full fiscal '26, we now expect revenues to be in the range of 3% to 5%…

Thanks, Angie. [Operator Instructions] Operator, would you provide instructions for those on the call, please?

[Operator Instructions] And today's first question comes from Jason Kupferberg with Wells Fargo.

Definitely appreciate all the AI-related commentary, the client examples. What kind of quantitative evidence should investors be looking at to help substantiate the view that Accenture is a net beneficiary of AI?

Thanks, Jason. I would just start with that, at this point in our business, AI is permeating everything we do because it either is driving why clients are actually doing things like moving to the cloud, but when we're doing something that isn't specific AI, they are looking at our AI credentials because everything is aimed to get to AI. And then, of course, we have direct AI. And then, our managed services business is being evaluated by how good our platforms are and their expectations of building AI. And so like to start with like your first kind of way of looking at is how is our business performing relative to everyone else and are we taking market share, right? That is the -- because at this point, it's not isolated, right? It really is why we're winning, and it's -- you have to have it to win -- you have to be a leader to win at the levels we're winning of like $22 billion. And then, we're going to give you metrics, Jason, over time, that will change to kind of tell you. And so today, we look at market share. We look at our overall growth. And then, the metrics we're giving you are the ones we're using, which is because everything is so tied to the big ecosystem, is our growth with that ecosystem outpacing overall growth, and then, how are we doing with the emerging players? And then, we are looking at how many companies are initiating AI with us among our client base, which are the metrics we gave you today. So the metrics will change, right, but they reflect what we're looking at as we drive our business.

Understood. Understood. And maybe just one on the numbers. I mean, the consulting bookings growth has been accelerating in the past few quarters. And then, just looking at the modestly upsized revenue outlook for the year, I mean, even if you only deliver the middle of the Q3 range in constant currency, I think you'll be at 4% year-to-date. You've obviously got the easier compare in the fourth quarter when you lap the U.S. Federal headwind. So any reason to not think the upper part of the full year? 3% to 5% range is a pretty plausible outcome, I mean, unless obviously, if there's some major economic disruption from the Middle East.

Jason, the 3% to 5% guide for the full year, which is really 4% to 6% excluding Federal, is our best view based upon what we see today. We had bookings that were really, really strong at $22 billion, which were actually a record for us this quarter, and it's our third consecutive quarter of $20 billion of bookings or more. And so for us, our guided range, we do aim for the top. We'll see how things play out, but it's our best view. And you're right, we will anniversary AFS in the fourth quarter, the headwind from that, and we expect that to grow in the fourth quarter.

And our next question comes from Tien-Tsin Huang with JPMorgan.

Nice results here, especially on the free cash flow. I'll also ask on AI if that's okay. Julie, appreciate your comments there on why it's a tailwind, but I was just thinking with these frontier models that are improving so quickly, it's driving a lot of news flow and a lot of debate. And are you seeing any correlation? Or are you tracking this -- how these models and how they're improving and their capabilities improving and how that might impact your bookings growth and conversion to revenue? I'm just trying to understand if there's some kind of correlation or pattern, and how that might impact your numbers here going forward as the frontier models improve.

Thanks, Tien-Tsin. It's a great question, and I think it goes to the heart of kind of what's different with models versus when you release functionality in a packaged solution as we've seen in the past, right, is the models are basically just a super powerful engine. So if you think about the car, right, you've got this great engine only if it's connected to everything, if it has wheels, so you can actually make it run and the transmission to guard it. And so, when the models come out, there isn't a direct correlation to bookings or new work, but what it does is create the next opportunity for us to look at what are the solutions that it's going to now create. And so, if you think about in earlier days, a lot of the work was focused on things like summarization and content creation. The better the models are, it's able to fuel things like moving into Agentic, where you -- and we're starting to see that. So we're starting to see more experimentation and use of agents, really basic workflows as the models get better. So think of the release of the models as the beginning of creating new opportunities for us to take to our clients even as, right, there's a lot of work that we have -- that we're doing based on everything that has already happened. Does that help?

No, it really helps. I like the analogy, and it's insightful. Maybe as my follow-up, just I get this question a lot, Julie and Angie, just thinking about the large deals here, you've won a lot. That trend continues. But with respect to AI, how would you characterize the mix of advanced AI work between growth or revenue-generating use cases against the efficiency-led use cases? We hear a little bit of a pickup on the growth side, but I'd love to hear what you're seeing on the ground there on the mix shift?

Yes. So I think the first shift that's happening is the focus. It is not yet in the mix. So our latest survey that we do every quarter of the C-suite and how their view of AI. The latest survey had 78% now saying we think growth is going to be the biggest value. That's not yet translating on the ground to being the biggest driver, mostly because of where the technology is. If you think about kind of the early days, a lot of it is about content, summarization, et cetera, that is really an efficiency play. And as the capabilities improve, you start to see more ability to take it into the core business and to do more complex work. So, we are absolutely seeing an uptick in growth-focused AI programs, but efficiency is still leading the way. I will tell you that the most exciting area right now on growth is conversational and Agentic commerce. Demand is surging there. And I think as that -- and that's where we're investing a lot. I think, as that takes off, you're going to start to see real results from -- on the growth side from these new developments. And that's a whole new market. And it's a whole new opportunity for us that we're super well-positioned, of course, because of Song.

And our next question today comes from Kevin McVeigh at UBS.

Congratulations on the results. If I heard right, it sounds like the acquisitions for -- will be upwards of $5 billion. I think that was from $3 billion last quarter. Is that right? And then, it doesn't seem like it's translating to the inorganic growth. So is that just the timing -- or the contribution from the inorganic? Is that just the timing of when they -- when those acquisitions come in?

Kevin, that's exactly right. So, we currently see $5 billion and have the potential to do more based upon the opportunities that are -- become available. In terms of the inorganic contribution, we still expect about 1.5%, and that really is on timing.

That's terrific. And then just the expanding AI -- the expanding bookings with the newer partners you have, is there any way to think about how that is relative to kind of the existing pool and how that scales over time? Because it seems like they're on pace to double, which is terrific. Just any way to dimensionalize that? And I guess, the new ones, I mean, with Anthropic, Databricks and NVIDIA, so on and so forth.

In terms of dimensionalizing it, what we're seeing is that really across the board, we've got really strong growth, both with our large ecosystem partners and with the emerging partners. And the way to think about that is that the -- as the -- and a little bit what I was talking about earlier is the models are improving the kind of ability to deploy them in the enterprise expands, right? So think about we're now doing work like in Know Your Customer in the KYC area in banking because we don't have great package solutions of software there. As the models get better, it solves some of the problems that are there. You're seeing in things like the mainframe, as the models are helping us do the really not fun, dirty work of converting code, we are now able to kind of open up that market where clients are now going to be more willing to touch the mainframe. So I would really think about both the large ecosystem partners and the emerging partners together because all of these solutions are really working across the ecosystem.

And our next question today comes from Darrin Peller at Wolfe Research.

All right. Julie and Angie, can you just touch on your headcount growth expectations? And maybe just higher level, your headcount strategy, has there been any change in linearity that maybe you're seeing, particularly related to AI, but more broadly in the environment right now would be great?

Darrin, so for us, headcount, we expect our headcount to increase in the second quarter based upon the demand that we see. And really, this is a continuation of the talent rotation that we discussed at the beginning of the fiscal year, and we expect our headcount to -- we expect to add headcount in the second quarter -- in the second half.

Okay. And guys, just when we think about linearity and how that's trending given AI and implementation for either your own use cases or customers, I'm just curious if it's impacting the strategy going forward.

By linearity, if you mean the sort of revenue and headcount, I just would remind you that we really have not had a linear relationship since around 2015, when RPA, when automation really came in. And so we would expect to continue to believe that disconnecting, and that's what's baked into our guidance.

Okay. All right. Just one more quick one is on visibility. Just sitting where we are today versus perhaps this time last year, how do you think about your visibility and confidence in the remainder of this year and even the next 12 months, just given all the conversations? Are there any more uncertainties in clients now given AI or anything else for that matter, that geopolitics, et cetera?

Well, what I would just say is that, obviously, there's a lot of uncertainty right now in the environment, which we're not baking into our guidance. But our guidance reflects our confidence in what we are seeing at the account, and we haven't seen -- at our clients, and we haven't seen anything yet being impacted by the war. But obviously, there is a big uncertainty because of the war, but we're very confident based on the information we have right now on what we see for the next 2 quarters.

And that's why we were able to bring the bottom up of our guide and what we see is the large deals layering in. And the second is the anniversary of AFS, so we have visibility to that.

Our next question today comes from Bryan Bergin at TD Cowen.

I wanted to ask about some of the emerging and, I guess, evolving delivery model. So, as we think about AI increasingly in the future, to what extent does the broader GSI and tech consulting model need to pivot to an FTE model? You had an interesting announcement yesterday with Microsoft. Just curious, like if we fast forward a few years, is the majority of tech service implementation likely to be in an FTE model or just more so a mix? And near term, any important financial considerations as you lean into this model with partners?

What I would say is it will definitely be a mix, and that's because the way that the FTE model today really gives value is when you are going in and solving problems that haven't been solved, typically in mission-critical areas, where in order to get the AI to work, and these are usually like bespoke problems, at least initially, you have to have deep domain knowledge from the clients, the technology knowledge and then what we bring to the table, right, the experience, the integration, the industry and functional knowledge, and you work in teams to solve new problems. And then, the idea from there, of course, is that we will then replicate that over time at other clients. And so, there's more and more agility in how we're delivering, but the actual kind of thing that people call FTE models is really about solving those problems. We do think that delivery overall, it is changing. We're already using both more technology, but also being able to like kind of use more of these teams that have all of those functions, industry, technology, functional expertise. And so we do think that the way we bring our teams together will change and some of that will be more upfront in like an FTE model. But what we are really differentiating in the market right now is that we have all of those skills at Accenture, and that's helping us win more.

Okay. That's helpful. And then, on free cash flow, so you've got good strong generation here, trailing 12 months, almost 30%. Can you comment on what you're doing differently here in net working capital or something tax related that's allowing for that, and obviously, the raise for the year aside from lower CapEx? And is it sustainable as we think about future free cash flow conversion?

Thanks, Bryan. Our free cash flow, we just recorded record free cash flow in -- on a year-to-date basis of $5.2 billion, and that is really driven by efficiencies in our operations as well as DSO. Our DSO was roughly about 5 days below last quarter, and it was 2 days better than the same time last year. That is just us continuing to focus on getting cash and operating more efficiently. So our raise this quarter for the full year, we were really pleased with, and it's a strong result at a free cash flow to net income ratio of 1.3.

And our next question today comes from Jonathan Lee at Guggenheim Partners.

Julie, I want to build on a prior question around V&A. Can you help us understand what's driving the step-up in deployment and whether this reflects a shift in acquisition strategy towards larger or earlier-stage assets, higher multiples in the market or perhaps a pivot toward IP-led deals?

Sure. I'll let Angie just talk about kind of how we're seeing valuations in a moment, but I want to talk a little bit just about -- to your point about what the strategy is. So our strategy that we've executed over the last decade or so has been to use V&A often to go into new areas that are higher growth. So we did that with Song. We've done that with Industry X. You saw us do that with capital projects over the last few years. And that is all to fuel organic growth, right? So it's increasing our total addressable market by going into new higher-growth areas. And that's, again, what you're seeing us do that. And we're doing that in key AI enablers. And so those are things like data centers, energy infrastructure. We're doing that in big, secular trends, like defense. You've seen those acquisitions over the last couple of years. And public sector is another one. Education is another one. So higher-growth areas, increasing our TAM. And then increasingly, we see an opportunity to meet unmet demand in the market where you don't have solutions where we can build products, either organically or by purchasing them. So our Faculty acquisition, for example, has a really unique decision intelligence product. And then, in addition, there are new commercial models where data is one of the key enablers of AI. And so you saw our Ookla acquisition, which is really about an incredible dataset. And the way that then gets into our business is the network is really core to both communications and all enterprises and to use AI having this kind of a dataset is incredibly powerful, and it's a completely different commercial model, a licensing and subscription base. And so we're also using our balance sheet to get into these exciting new areas that also bring us new commercial models that are not linked to FTE. And that will then mean we kind of have a different mix in terms of the financial profile and valuations. And Angie will just give us a quick update into how to think about that.

Yes. And so in some cases, we are paying higher multiples than in the past. So the immediate uplift is lower in those instances than prior acquisitions. So that said, we are intentionally shifting towards higher-growth, higher-margin assets that are going to fuel organic growth and strengthen our capabilities, and it's really to position us for long-term growth and returns.

Helpful color on the strategic pivot there. As a follow-up, one of your partners recently highlighted the ability to reduce SAP ERP migration workloads to as little as 2 weeks using AI. How do you respond to concerns that AI tools are compressing project time lines, relative rate cards and reducing the TAM for systems integration work? And are you seeing similar compression in your own engagements? And if so, how are you offsetting this through volume or new service offerings?

Yes. So in general, you should think about our strategy is always that the more that we can use technology to bring more value to clients faster, the better it is for our business. And that's the strategy you've seen us execute ever since RPA really burst on the scene in 2015, because when you can actually make -- especially the technical piece of it go faster, there's so much work, all the process change, all the change management, et cetera, that like the SAP deals are multiyear. And those often become gating items that they're not investing in other parts of the technology landscape or other parts of the business because they have these huge projects. And so we see this as -- whether it's in ERP or mainframe, it helps because the actual technical piece is a small piece compared to the rest of the work, and it leads to more work. And so for example, just last week, we were at AIPCon Palantir's conference with SAP, Palantir and Accenture on stage saying we're going to develop those products. They're really not developed yet at scale in any way, but we're working together because it will be a net benefit to our clients, which means it will be a net benefit to us. That's how we think about it.

And our next question today comes from Sean Kennedy at Mizuho.

So one of the themes across the sector currently is higher-margin AI services offsetting more competitive pricing in legacy services. So I was wondering if Accenture is seeing similar trends helping with gross margin? And also, how much of a productivity boost is Accenture seeing internally from these AI programs?

Sean, so let me just start with pricing. For us, this quarter, we -- pricing, which is the margin on the work that we sell, we saw improvements in some areas of our business, and we continue to operate in a highly competitive environment.

Yes. Internally, we think about applying AI in our delivery, where we're continuing to improve our efficiencies in delivery, which has also helped fueling our growth. And then, in how we operate Accenture, we're deploying all the services we give to clients to us. We're often the experimentation place as well, and we're really pleased, and you can see that being reflected in the efficiencies we're getting that are reflected in ROI.

Operator, we have time for one more question, and then, Julie will wrap up the call.

Absolutely. And our final question today comes from Dave Koning with Baird.

It seems like you're doing very well with big clients, 41 with $100 million plus in quarterly bookings this quarter. That's been in the low 30s. So that number is up 20% plus. Do you think big clients, the big -- the huge companies that we all know well are early to spend on AI and big transformational projects in the more mid-sized companies are kind of a little more of a wait-and-see mode? And actually, you might be at the front end of a big swell of those picking up after the big clients are starting to spend on this. Just interested in your thoughts there.

Yes. It's a great question. I don't see it developing quite that way because actually some of the smaller companies are spending a fair amount, like that's where there's a lot of growth, and it's one of the reasons we're focusing even more on the mid-market and made a few acquisitions there to fuel that organic growth. The way I would think about the $100 million bookings or more is that in the large enterprises, it just is a reflection of just how much reinvention they have to do and that AI is the catalyst for that. And they have big estates that have to be modernized, a lot of change. And so those -- that's really kind of a reflection more of how much they have to do. And at the same time, I believe we are early in what will be like a large funnel of work because in both the big enterprises and the small enterprises, you just think about -- I talked a little bit about this in the script, like everybody who's put in modern ERP in the last few years, and we're the #1 partner there, none of -- no advanced AI was possible there, right? So like that's a whole wave of work that has to get started, right? And then, we're beginning to see early momentum on, right? And that's not even then -- we've done very little still in core operations because the advanced AI isn't quite there, like physical AI is going to be coming. Agentic AI is still early. So we just see a lot of work, but the technology has got to get to the right level, and of course, factors like the macro feed into that. So we're really excited about the long term because there's so much more value that clients are going to get from AI. And we're demonstrating every quarter that we're the -- they're the one that they're coming to us for it. So thank you for the question.

And just a quick follow-up. I think Angie said Federal spending would be up year-over-year again in fiscal Q4. I'm just wondering into next year, does that normalize that back to the higher level that it's been into next year?

David, we'll give you an update in September on that, but we feel really good about the fact that we are anniversarying the headwind, and we're getting back to growth in fourth quarter with our Federal business.

Go Federal. All right. Thanks, everyone. I just want to thank all our shareholders for your continued trust and support and all of our reinventors around the world that every day are delivering incredible value. So thanks for joining, and we'll talk to you next quarter.

Thank you.

Thank you. That concludes today's conference call. We thank you all for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect your lines, and have a wonderful day.