Good day, everyone. My name is Abigail, and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome you to the Ameren Corporation fourth quarter 2025 earnings call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speakers' remarks, there will be a question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question during this time, if you have joined via the webinar, please use the raise hand icon, which can be found at the bottom of your webinar application. At this time, I would like to turn the call over to Andrew Kirk, Senior Director of Investor Relations and Corporate Modeling.

Thank you, and good morning. On the call with me today are Martin J. Lyons, our Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Michael L. Moehn, our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. As well as other members of the Ameren Corporation management team, including Michael Moehn, Group President of Ameren Utilities. This call contains time sensitive data that is accurate only as of the date of today's live broadcast and redistribution of this broadcast is prohibited. We have posted a presentation on the amereninvestors.com homepage that will be referenced by our speakers. As noted on page two of the presentation, comments made during this conference call may contain statements about future expectations, plans, projections, financial performance, similar matters, which are commonly referred to as forward looking statements. Please refer to the forward looking statements section in the news release we issued yesterday as well as our SEC filings for more information about the various factors that could cause results to differ materially from those anticipated. I will now turn the call over to Martin J. Lyons. Thanks, Andrew. Morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us.

Beginning on page four, here we highlight some of the key updates we will cover today. We will walk through our 2025 financial results, recap key accomplishments, and discuss how we are well positioned for 2026 and the years ahead. Specifically, we delivered 2025 adjusted earnings of $5.03 per share which represents 8.6% growth over adjusted 2024 results. And we affirmed our 2026 earnings per share guidance range of $5.25 to $5.45. I am also pleased to report that this week, we signed 2.2 gigawatts of large load electric service agreements in Missouri. We continue to take meaningful steps towards supporting significant economic development opportunities emerging across our service territory while also continuing to provide strong value for all our customers and our communities.

I am proud

not only the strong operational and financial results we delivered as an Ameren team, but also our strategic plans and accomplishments, that we expect will lead to competitive long term returns for our shareholders in the years ahead. Today, we issued 6% to 8% earnings per share growth guidance for the period 2026 to 2030, and we continue to expect year over year results near the upper end of that range. Turning now to page five. As always, at the center of everything we do, is creating value for the 2,500,000 electric and 900,000 natural gas customers, that we have the privilege to serve. Our three pillar strategy investing in rate regulated infrastructure, advocating for constructive regulatory and legislative frameworks, and optimizing our business, continue to guide our work for customers, communities, and shareholders. This year, the Ameren team accomplished all of the key strategic objectives we outlined a year ago. Shown on page six. This included investment of more than $4,000,000,000 in electric, natural gas, and transmission infrastructure, we installed nearly 26,000 electric distribution poles, 283 miles of upgraded transmission and distribution lines, and underground cable, 750 smart switches, and 31 new or upgraded substations. We also made significant progress on the development of new generation resources. On the regulatory front, we received constructive orders in both Missouri and Illinois electric and natural gas rate reviews. And legislatively, the enactment of Missouri Senate Bill 4 provides support for economic development, and investment in reliable energy for years to come. To further advance economic development and ongoing reliability, we updated our Ameren Missouri preferred resource plan last February and immediately began executing on the accelerated components. Speaking of economic development, 2025, we worked with stakeholders across Missouri and Illinois to support more than 70 projects that are expected to bring…

Thanks, Marty. I am glad to be here with you today. I will begin on page 19 of our presentation with our 2025 earnings results. Yesterday, we reported 2025 adjusted earnings of $5.03 per share. Compared to earnings of $4.63 per share in 2024. Our 2025 adjusted earnings exclude certain tax benefits at three of our business segments: Ameren Transmission, Ameren Illinois Natural Gas, and Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution. These tax benefits were recorded in response to IRS guidance issued to another taxpayer and associated regulatory orders issued by FERC and the Illinois Commerce Commission regarding treatment of net operating loss carry forwards. Pursuant to this guidance and these orders, we decreased income tax expense by a total of $86,000,000 in 2025 resulting in a $0.32 per share benefit. On page 20, we summarize key drivers impacting adjusted earnings at each segment. As Marty outlined, we achieved strong earnings growth supported by strategic infrastructure investments, and robust retail sales at Ameren Missouri. Weather normalized sales at Missouri grew 1% overall with 0.5% and 1.5% growth for our residential and commercial class respectively. We also experienced favorable weather across our service territory. At the same time, we funded incremental and maintenance activities in Missouri to improve grid and energy center reliability for the benefits of our customers. Of course, disciplined cost management remains core to our way of doing business. Process improvements across both states help us start jobs sooner and complete work faster, delivering tangible benefits for customers. For instance, in the past two years, we achieved $20,000,000 in recurring O&M savings from energy delivery process improvements including enhanced fieldwork scheduling that were implemented has improved productivity by about 25%. Looking ahead, continued efforts to simplify and standardize processes are expected to drive efficiency, improve customer experience, and help keep…

We will now move to our question and answer session. If you have joined via the webinar, please use the raise hand icon, which can be found on the bottom of your webinar application. When you are called on, please unmute your line and ask your question. We will now pause a moment to assemble the queue. Our first question comes from Julien Dumoulin-Smith with Jefferies. Hey. Good morning. Can you guys hear me okay?

Yes, Julien. Good morning. Hey. Love that it works. Excellent. Hey. Well, look.

Nicely done all around. I have to hand it to you guys. Just a couple questions real quickly. First off, on the 2.2 gigs of executed ESAs, any caveats on why not to include it here? I mean, obviously it is relatively recent. And then separately, can you talk a little bit about the commentary about being at the upper end of the six to eight? Just how does that reconcile with the 2.2? How do you think about, for instance, CapEx reconciling with that and how that would position you here? I will leave it there.

Yes. That is fine, Julien. I will try to, this is Marty. Obviously, I will try to answer those, those questions. Yes. Look. We are off to an exciting start to 2026, February in particular. You know, it has been this month that we have been able to sign these 2.2 gigawatts of ESAs. And as we talked about on the call as well, just this week, the Public Service Commission in Missouri approved our Big Hollow 800 megawatt simple cycle gas plant as well as some battery energy storage of 400 megawatts. And it is been an exciting month and a great start to the year. You know, as we think about our guidance and the sales growth looking ahead, as you know, what has been baked into our guidance over the past year has really been about 1.2 gigawatts of new demand by 2030. And as we talked about in our IRP last year, up to about a gig and a half by 2032. But for purposes of guidance, that 1.2 gigawatts by 2030 is certainly relevant. That, of course, was sort of the baseline that was in our preferred resource plan that we filed with the commission this past year and is shown on page 13 of the slide deck we posted today. But importantly, that 1.2 gigs, was in the guidance we provided, that 6% to 8%. And as we guided last year and we continue to guide, we really expect to be able to deliver near the upper end of that range over the five year period. So as you look at this 2.2 gigawatts of ESAs, that certainly represents upside to the sales growth that has been embedded in that 6% to 8% guidance. And in our assertion, we expect to deliver near the upper end of that range. So it does represent upside. Now as you mentioned, we just got these ESAs signed here in February, and there is a lot of milestones ahead with respect to the development of those data centers associated with those ESAs. You know, things like actual customer announcements, project announcements, groundbreakings, the construction of those data centers. So, again, I would say that the ESAs that we signed and the two point gigawatts, certainly gives us greater confidence with respect to our ability to deliver over this time period towards that upper end of that 6% to 8%. And I would say, depending upon the ramp rates, gives us the potential to even achieve above that. So we are very excited about it. It has been a great start to the year. Hopefully, that answers your questions.

Absolutely. Thank you very much. I appreciate that. And then just if I can quickly follow up, you made reference here to hybrid securities real quickly. How do you think about that as being part of the plan? I mean, clearly, is. Do you think about that strategically here? And is that accretive to the plan when you talk about being near the upper end of six to eight? Is that an incremental source of latitude here just to come back to what is in versus out of the plan?

Yes. I think as you think about utilization of these securities versus straight equity, it might be slightly accretive in the short term. I think over time, we would have to evaluate whether it is or is not from that standpoint. Obviously, there is the interest cost associated with those securities. So it may be more of a neutral, over time, but something that we are going to evaluate as we think about the financing plans we have ahead. Obviously, one of the things that we have really utilized over time are these ATM issuances to fulfill our equity needs. I think we will continue to lean on that heavily, that kind of approach as we think about our financing plans. But always want to keep our options open.

Awesome, guys. Alright. I will leave it there. Thank you so much.

Our next

question comes from the line of Shahriar Pourreza with Wells Fargo. Please unmute your line and ask your question.

Good morning. It is actually Andrew Kadavy on for Shar. Thanks taking my questions.

Morning, Andrew. With your rate base CAGR at

10.6% and your EPS CAGR at 6%–8%, there is a healthy amount of lag. How much of that is financing versus how much is structural? And how much can you narrow the lag in time and put upward pressure on the 6%–8%?

I am just trying to follow you. So maybe repeat that question for us. Yes. So there is a

a little bit of lag between your rate base growth and your earnings growth, and I just want to know how that breaks down between financing and maybe other structural issues. And then is there

there a way to narrow that lag?

Yes. No. I have got you. Look. I think if you look at our rate base growth, about 10.6%, and you think about the amount of equity that we plan to issue, and think about the dilution from that, that is the primary difference between the 10.6% rate base CAGR and where we plan to deliver from an EPS perspective, which, as I just said a moment ago, is consistently towards the upper end of that 6% to 8% range. I think the other thing to think about over this time period is as these sales come better into focus, from the hyperscalers that we are working with in these ESAs, that too can help to reduce any differential that we have between allowed ROEs and earned ROEs that also can help from an earnings perspective. So those are some of the big drivers that come to mind. And then I would just say, we are obviously a fully rate regulated business. And as you well know, there can be lag as you think about over time during the periods between rate reviews. And so those are just some of the things to think about in terms of the earnings growth, the earned ROEs, etcetera.

Thank you. Very helpful. Switching gears a little. We have seen some data center developers cancel projects despite having signed ESAs in place in other states.

Are there any concerns on your end about the potential for cancellations with your ESAs? And could you give us a little color on when the large load take or pay provisions in the ESA became binding for the customer?

Yes. All really good questions. First of all, with respect to these ESAs, the counterparties and the terms of these, and the ramp rates are all highly confidential. So cannot get into any of that. I would not say that we have any concerns with respect to these ESAs or the projects coming to fruition. That said, I mentioned there is significant milestones ahead in terms of project announcements, the groundbreaking, the construction. So certainly recognize those uncertainties as we look ahead. But, again, our 6% to 8% EPS growth guidance, our expectation of delivering near the upper end, again, was really based on about 1.2 gigawatts of sales growth between now and 2030. ESAs we have signed represents upside. And I think that speaks to the conservatism that we have in our overall guidance range. Given again some of the uncertainties ahead. But we certainly do not have any concerns as we sit here today. Yes. I did. This is Michael. I agree with I agree with everything that Marty is saying. I think beyond that, there are a number of provisions, obviously, in the tariff itself and the ESA that are protective to customers. In terms of termination provisions, minimum monthly payments,

security,

requirements, etcetera. So a number of links have gone numbers have gone to great lengths here to make sure that we are protecting customers at the end of the day as well in case that would happen. Yes. Those are great points, Michael. And, while we cannot speak to the specifics of individual ESAs, you can see some of that outlined on slide 12 that, as Michael mentioned, are all part of our large load tariff design.

Thanks. I will leave it there.

Our next question comes from the line of Diana Niles with JPMorgan. You may now unmute your line and ask your question. Hey. Good morning. Thank you so much for taking my questions today.

Hey. So how do you

Good to have you.

Thanks. So looking at your infrastructure investment pipeline, are there timing considerations? To some of the future opportunities there? Thinking about how much might fall within the five year plan period or how much visibility you have beyond 2030?

Yes. Are you really getting to the CapEx and how we see that playing out? At a high level, we talked about over the ten year plan, really about $70,000,000,000 of investment opportunities, and we laid that out in our slide. And then, during the five year period, expecting $31,800,000,000 of infrastructure investments. And largely being driven by generation investments in Missouri. As we think about transitioning our fleet over time. But that may not be specifically answering your question if you want to dive a little deeper.

Yes. I guess sort of asking there, like, maybe how to think about the cusp between like, the five year plan of 2030 and beyond. Like, we are seeing continued smooth investment there, or are you thinking about filling more opportunities in?

Yes. I think look. We try to smooth things out over time. I think it is something that is certainly good for customers as you think about bringing those investments into rate base over time. And making a stable investment profile overall. At times, it will be a bit lumpy, though. As we especially as you think about some of the infrastructure investments we have with respect to generation resources, they can certainly be more significant investments and create some lumpiness in the investment profile. And so, a couple things we have got coming up. As you can see in our slides, we have got some significant investments in simple cycle gas fired generation that are coming into service in 2027 and 2028. If you look at our integrated resource plan, we have a pretty significant combined cycle facility, 2,100 megawatts that we plan to bring into service in the 2031 time frame. So there is certainly some lumpiness there. The other thing I would say just to watch for did not emphasize it necessarily on this call, but did highlight it, which is that later this year, we do expect to make our triennial integrated resource plan filing in Missouri. And in that plan, we will certainly be looking at any opportunities to accelerate generation investments. Specifically maybe looking at things like batteries, perhaps renewables. But as you move into that 2030 to 2040 time frame, also looking at the need and potential additional investments in dispatchable generation facilities. I do not want to front run that process. It is a comprehensive update. We will look comprehensively at sales, generation options, costs. We will get stakeholder input. And, but, again, that will be a meaningful filing we will have later this year. The other thing I would maybe point you to is, today, we also, in Missouri, announced our updated Smart Energy Plan. If you look into the details of that filing you can kinda see some of the year by year investments, that are planned in Missouri. Similarly, if you look over in Illinois,

earlier this year, we made our updated grid plan grid investment plan filing. There too, you can see some of the planned investments on a year by year basis. So those are a couple of resources you can look to that are out there publicly.

Great. Thank you very much. Our next question comes from the line of William Appicelli with UBS. You may now unmute your line and ask your question.

Yes. Hi. Good morning.

Morning, Bill.

Just a couple of quick

On the theme of affordability, can you just maybe outline

how you guys view this updated plan in terms of customer bill impact? I guess, particularly in Missouri. And whether or not the benefit of the ESAs would help to defray some of that impact?

Yes, Bill. Affordability is certainly a key concern of ours on an ongoing basis across

both of our jurisdictions in Missouri and Illinois. And, as you know, really focusing on disciplined cost control, has been a focus, a long time focus of this company. In fact, as you look back even over the past five years, I think our O&M CAGR was something like 2.8% at the same time that consumer prices went up about 4.6%. So we have got a history of really looking to continuous improvement at the company to really take costs out to produce productivity enhancements and optimize. But that work is never done. Certainly, there is always the benefit of new technologies, new ways of doing things. And, we are continuing to keep a sharp focus on continuous improvement and process improvement. We call them transformation activities internally. We have got a number of efforts going on right now that, again, we expect to be able to continue to bend that cost curve. And as we said on the call, really look to keep O&M costs as low as prudently possible and really deliver under that rate of inflation. And I say prudently because there are times we are going to want to invest back in the system. We have done that with things like tree trimming, investments in our power plants, things that really keep our resources reliable and produce good reliability for our customers. So we are going to keep a good focus on all of those things. As we think about this incremental sales opportunity we have, a key focus of Senate Bill 4 in Missouri last year was really to require that at the end of the day, we design a tariff that really is focused on making sure that these new data centers are paying for the cost to connect them to the system. And paying their fair share for the cost to serve them. Really providing reasonable assurance that there is no burden being borne by the rest of our customers. So that was a focus of the legislature. And certainly a focus of the Missouri commission as they approved the tariff that we will be utilizing to serve these customers. It was a focus of ours as we went through the negotiation of the ESAs that we announced earlier today, and I think it will be a continuing focus as we go through our rate review proceedings in the future. But again, the goal is for them to pay their fair share, the cost of providing them service, and at a minimum, to not have a burden fall on the rest of our customers. And we are certainly hopeful that over time, as these sales increase, that there would actually be benefits for the remainder of our customers. So again, affordability has been and will continue to be a big focus for us.

Okay. That is very helpful. And then just a point of clarification. The 3.4 gigawatts of construction agreements, I guess, that is inclusive of the 2.2 ESAs, right? So does that imply that there is about 1.2 gigawatts of sort of advanced negotiations around additional large load customers?

You know, some are advanced, some are not. I would just say that, that is you are correct, by the way. The 3.4 is inclusive of the 2.2. And they are in various stages of development.

Okay. And then just to an earlier question about rolling in the benefits of the ESAs. Is that something you would look to do on a future quarterly call, or would that need to wait until, you know, sort of your next full reset, you know, maybe on Q3?

Yes. Look. I think we will monitor over time. You know?

I mentioned some of the milestones ahead with respect to the development of these data centers and getting clarity in terms of a sales forecast. I also mentioned other drivers that might be out there. For example, we have an update to the integrated resource plan later this year in Missouri. I think there will be a number of things that will come into greater focus over the course of the year. I would not rule out an update as part of a quarterly conference call. Obviously, things are moving at a faster pace than they historically and we will need to think about being more nimble as well in terms of the guidance we provide.

Alright. Great. Thanks very much.

Our next

comes from Carly S. Davenport with Goldman Sachs. Please unmute your line and ask your question. Good morning. Thanks for taking the questions.

Maybe one just on Missouri. I know we are still pretty early in the legislative session there, but I think there have been some bills introduced, around data centers and other. So just curious if you have any early thoughts on potential impact there or if there is any other legislation that you have been watching.

Hey, Carly. It is Michael. Yes. There are a number of bills floating around. There are a couple of bills related to solar. We continue to engage with stakeholders, sponsors around that. It is early innings. I think people are open to discussion. Again, with all resources, there is always certain concerns. My sense is that we can find a path forward on this. Maybe related to some solar setbacks or some changes in local taxing authority, but look, solar is an important resource, combined with

everything else that we are doing from a natural gas and nuclear or coal perspective.

As we just indicated, Marty just went through eloquently, we need all of this generation. So we engage with the stakeholders around this, and, hopefully, we can land in a good spot. Beyond that, not a lot of, you know, we had some success, obviously, last year with Senate Bill 4. The focus really has been on the implementation of that Senate bill. There were a number of provisions in there around future test years for water and gas utilities. Those rulemakings are active and we are participating in that process. That is important. We get that right. I think that could be a framework for us going forward on the electric side. And beyond that, we will just continue to evaluate the session.

Got it. Great. Thank you for that. And then just a question as you think about the financing path. Any sense how much of the equity you could look to satisfy with the hybrids? And then outside of that, is the ATM still the sort of preferred method of issuance?

Hey. Good morning, Carly. Thanks for the question or Sophie. Carly. I am sorry. Thanks for the question. As we said in the plan, we have not specified what amounts we are going to be using. But the plan, if you think back at the $4,000,000,000 over the five years, it is on average $800,000,000 a year. Remember, 2026 was completed with a forward sales agreement. We have had success with ATMs over the year. And we will continue to leverage that throughout the plan. Hybrids are part of the solution, and we will continue to make determination as we progress throughout the year.

Great. Thank you so much for the color.

Our last question comes from Sophie Karp with KeyBanc. Please unmute your line and ask your question. Hi. Good morning. Thank you for taking my questions.

So

Hi, Sophie. Was hi. I was wondering how you guys

see your role in, I guess, educating the communities, particularly in Missouri, on the benefits of having the data center under the special tariff and whether it is actually any benefits to them. Because what we see is a lot of pushback on it, because of the media coverage that data centers receive and all of communities without maybe that there might be a benefit to them begin to oppose these developments. So my question is, do you see yourself having a role in actively educating these communities to prevent those outcomes?

Well, I think we have a role specifically with respect to clarifying the impacts on reliability, affordability of energy services. And so I think with respect to the broader benefits to the community in terms of jobs, economic development, impacts on other aspects. I think, again, it would be up to really the data centers developers, the hyperscalers, to provide clarity with respect to broader impacts of their operations. We think it is, again, important for us to be there and be engaged and to be able to speak to the legislation that has been put in place, the terms and conditions of our tariffs, the ESAs that we are signing, also important, the generation resources that we have available, the generation resources that we are building. And the fact that we do believe we can serve these additional customers reliably. And as I said earlier in my remarks, provide service to them in a way that they will be paying for the cost to connect them to the system, and they will be paying for the cost to serve them. And the reasonable assurance that can be provided to the rest of our customers that they will not be negatively impacted by the service provided to these customers. And so I do think we have a role in speaking to that.

Alright. Thank you. And then maybe on Illinois a little. Do you, I guess Illinois has been kind of not on the forefront of your investment plan lately. Can you talk a little bit about the regulatory climate in that state? How it has been evolving? And is there a potential for upside from the multiyear grid plan or some other pending regulatory proceedings? In Illinois.

Yes. So, yes. Look. Illinois does remain, obviously, an important part of our business. And, I would say, we do continue to invest significantly in Illinois. As you see in our five year plan about $3,600,000,000 in electric distribution, we have got $1,900,000,000 going into Illinois natural gas. And they are growing at somewhat of a slower growth rate than we are seeing with respect to our transmission operations and Missouri but continues to be a significant place for investment. And I think if you look at the regulatory environment over there, I would tell you, I feel like it is stabilizing, and, in some cases, improving. If you look at this past year end and you can see some of this on slide, I think, 21 that we provided, but the commission approved the reconciliation for our last multiyear rate plan. In December. In November, we got an order in our gas case that we had pending. And, what you saw there is both an increase in average rate base going from $2,850,000,000 to $3.2, and you saw an ROE move from 9.44 up to 9.6. And so, I think, it is a place that I know there were concerns over the past couple years, and I am not saying those concerns have completely dissipated in the investment community. But I think we have seen a stabilization, I would say, constructiveness with respect to the recent decisions. We have got this multiyear grid plan filing that is out there. We just made that in January. In that filing, we look to listen to feedback we have gotten from commissioners and other stakeholders in the past. We look to really support the investments that we are making there. We think they are the right investments to make for our customers. And we will look to engage with stakeholders over the course of this year and expect an ICC decision in December. Hey, Sophie. It is Michael. Yes. I agree with everything that Marty said there. But, in addition to that, I think the other thing that came out of this recent legislation, this surge of legislation that was filed, this construct of an IRP. The state of Illinois. I think that it really is a very good constructive step forward to give a clear picture of the resource adequacy issues, in both PJM and MISO. Hopefully, within a framework to begin to deal with this from a long term reliability. So we look forward to engaging in that. And think it does continue to add to Marty's comments around the stability of the state.

Great. Thank you. Appreciate the comments.

There are no more questions at this time. I would now like to turn the call over to Martin J. Lyons for closing remarks.

Well, again, thank you all for joining us today. I think you can tell we are off to an exciting start here in 2026 as a company. I want to once again thank the entire Ameren team, for all of their hard work serving our customers, serving our communities, and delivering the results that we have been able to deliver. And with that, for all of you that joined us today, please be safe, and we look forward to seeing many of you as we get out on the road in the months ahead.

Thank you.