Good morning and welcome to the Fiscal 2019 First Quarter Earnings Call for Applied Industrial Technologies. My name is Mariana, and I'll be your operator for today's call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Please note this conference is being recorded. I will now turn the call over to Julie Kho. Julie, you may begin.

Thank you and good morning, everyone. This morning, we issued our earning release and supplemental investor deck detailing latest quarter results. These documents are available in the Investor Relations of our website at applied.com. A replay of today's broadcast will be available for the next two weeks as noted in the press release. Before we begin, I would like to remind everyone that we'll discuss Applied's business outlook during the conference call, and make statements that are considered forward-looking. All forward-looking statements, including those made during the question-and-answer portion, speak only as of the date hereof and are based on current expectations that are subject to certain risks, including trends in various industry sectors and geographies, the success of our various business strategies and other risk factors provided in our press release and identified in Applied's most recent periodic report and other filings made with the SEC, which are available at the Investor Relations section of our website at applied.com. Accordingly, actual results may differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements. The Company undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements, whether due to new information or events or otherwise. In addition, the conference call includes the use of non-GAAP financial measures. These measures are explained in our press release and in the supplemental presentation material and are subject to the qualifications referenced in those documents. In compliance with SEC Regulation FD, this teleconference is being made available to the media and the general public as well as to analysts and investors. Because the teleconference and its webcast are open to all constituents and prior notification has been widely and unselectively disseminated, all content of the call will be considered fully disclosed. Our speakers today include Neil Schrimsher, Applied's President and Chief Executive Officer; and Dave Wells, our Chief Financial Officer. I will now turn the call over to Neil.

Thank you, Julie, and good morning, everyone. We appreciate you joining us. I know many of you have already seen our results and Dave will provide more detail later in the call, but I’d like to make a few comments on the key highlights. On the heels of our fiscal 2018 record financial performance, we delivered a solid start to fiscal 2019 as we continue leveraging our expanded capabilities and enhanced differentiation for growth and profitability. Our net sales for the quarter grew 27% to $864.5 million from $680.7 million in the same quarter a year ago. The overall sales increase for the quarter reflects 21.5% acquisition related growth and 6.9% organic growth, partially offset by the negative impact of foreign currency translation and Adoption of ASC 606 revised revenue recognition standards. Our sales growth was across all businesses and geographies, and while we reported more modest organic growth in fluid power, due to the ASC 606 revenue recognition adoption, we're encouraged that two thirds of the fluid power companies are exceeding plan, and that backlog grew 6% sequentially and nearly 25% year-over-year. Net income for the quarter increased 45.1% to $48.9 million from $33.7 million. Earnings per share rose 44.2% to $1.24 per share compared with $0.86 per share in the first quarter of fiscal 2018, inclusive of benefits from the lower U.S. statutory tax rate and the impact of discrete tax items in the quarter. EBITDA for the quarter of $82.5 million increase 32.4% versus the prior year quarter, reaching 9.5% of sales. The EBITDA growth and percentage of sales demonstrate the value of and positive impact from our expanding value add capabilities and accretive acquisitions. We're very pleased with the continued integration progress and development of synergies with FCX Performance. The FCX team members continue to provide great value add to customers, strong growth with suppliers and are performing ahead of plan in sales and profitability for calendar 2018. As I've referenced throughout the anniversary year, our 95 years of leadership in industrial distribution is based on our guiding principle of taking care of the customer. And while we are experiencing another active hurricane season at the start of this fiscal year, first with Florence and most recently Michael, our teams in the effective areas have worked diligently to overcome disruption and return to what we do best, taking care of the customer. We sincerely appreciate the extra efforts of our associates in these affected areas. At this time, I'll turn the call over to Dave for a closer look at our financial results.

Thanks Neil, and good morning everyone. Before we move on to cover further details on our most recent quarter financial performance, a reminder that the supplemental investor deck issued this morning, which recaps key financial and performance talking points is available for your reference on our investor’s site. As Neil noted, sales for the quarter ending September 2018 increased 27% over the prior year quarter with acquisitions driving a 21.5% increase in sales. Organically, sales grew 6.9% while the impact of foreign currency exchange decreased sales by 0.9%. Additionally, the company's adoption of ASC 606 revised revenue recognition standards had a 50 basis point negative impact on sales. First quarter sales in our service center based distribution segment increased by $35 million or 6.2% year-over-year. Foreign currency fluctuations had a 1.1% unfavorable impact. Excluding the adverse impact of currency translation, the organic sales increase was 7.3%. Moving to our Fluid Power and Flow Control segment, first quarter sales increased $149 million or 133% as compared to the prior year. Acquisitions within this segment, namely the addition of FCX performance generated 131% of the year-over-year segment growth. Excluding the impact of acquisitions, the segment generates 5% organic sales growth for the quarter, down slightly from recent quarters given the tougher year-over-year comps and timing of larger projects. Adoption of the AFC 606 revenue recognition standard had a 3% dilutive impact on the quarter sales growth. Excluding FCX, the legacy Fluid Power organic backlog at quarter end remained robust, increasing nearly 6% in the quarter, and up 24.8% year-over-year. From a geographic perspective, sales in the quarter for our U.S. operations were up $180 million or 31.7% year-over-year with acquisitions driving an increase of 25.8%. Excluding the acquisition impact, organic sales growth from U.S. operations reflected a 6.5% increase, which was partially…

Thanks Dave. Across the organization, we're excited about our growth prospects and remain focused on serving our customers, executing our business plans and delivering our commitments in fiscal 2019. As we make our way into the final months of our year long 95th anniversary celebration, we'd like to say thank you to all our stakeholders; including, customers, associates, suppliers and shareholders for the ongoing support and investment in supply [ph]. While we will enjoy the remaining months of the anniversary celebration, we will be even more focused on building upon our momentum to achieve our next level of performance. With that, we'll open up the lines for questions.

Thank you. We will now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from Ryan Cieslak with Northcoast Research. Your line is open.

Hey, good morning guys.

Good morning, Ryan.

The first question, I just wanted to get a sense ultimately of how the quarter progressed Neil, and maybe some updated thoughts of how October looks so far or at this point of a third [ph] quarter shaping up. And are you seeing any change in the end markets as it relates to maybe some impact from the tariffs, here changes in the way people are buying, the way people are approaching project activity, any color around that would be helpful? Thanks

Okay, sure. Our sales per day trend within the quarter Q1, we saw improvements from July to August and then again in August to September. We had the seasonality reduction from our Q4 to our Q1, but that has been less than other prior year. So that's encouraging. And then from an October standpoint, we've really seen it continue in the mid single digits range. So that's the view there. On the project side, and then I'm sure we'll get into price margin. I feel like we are doing a very effective job of dealing with 232 tariffs understanding 301 and the varied list, from list one, list two to list three and potentially list four in taking those increases on into point of sale prices. As I talk with customers, they are still optimistic on really the finish of 2018 and as they plan for and look out into 2019. Perhaps within sub segments, they may be thinking or timing of projects around their calendar year or perhaps fiscal year, but at this point more calendar year and flexing those dates a little bit, but not a great deal at this point.

Okay. Great. And then just maybe sticking on the tariff theme, and as you mentioned, maybe just give us an update and remind us again the exposure, the direct exposure, you have in terms of your sourcing for your products from China directly or even or indirectly. I'm pretty sure it's a-- it's a limited amount, but just give us an update there. And then, as it relates to pricing in general, how did the price cost and their [ph] mix look for you today? Have they changed materially couple of quarters, and how do you think about them in the next couple of quarters?

Okay, sure. So I would say, we have relatively low direct impact or direct China imports coming in -- impact on our products. So to our suppliers, perhaps a little bit more either in a finished product or component or assembly that they may put in into what becomes a finished product, but still for us and the impact relatively low there. I think about inflation and we’ve talked before, based on the repeatability of our sales, only one-third of our products repeat year-over-year in a quarter’s time frame. And so two-thirds would be more unique based on the value add, uniqueness of demand being part of assembly. So we don’t get a perfect price match on those, but we can sense or we know when inflation is coming in on those products. So I'd say from a pure price impact that we think would be coming through our sales, probably more in the 2% to 3% on the sales impact range, I would say, right now, I could see that increasing as we move on and into 2019 into the 3% to 4% range and perhaps a little bit higher depending on how some of these 301 tariffs continue to play out.

Okay. That's great color. And then last one from me and I'll get back in the queue. A lot of headlines throughout there about the Permian in the bottlenecks issues there. I know you guys have exposure as it relates to oil and gas businesses. Can you just give an update on what you’re seeing as it relates to your activity in those businesses and the order activity in the past quarter, has it changed any, has it slowed down, do you expect it to be impacted by that if not? And then how do you -- how are you projecting that in your guidance? What sort of assumed in your guidance as it relates to the Permian, many oil and gas businesses? Thanks.

Yes. So I don't know that it’s just the Permian, but it’s a key part. I’d say oil and gas, we look back and the quarter performed well, mid teens had from a sales per day rate basis, nice progress throughout the quarter. I think our companies that are performing upstream drilling or upstream on the production side continued to show improvements. I think some of the projections still for the Permian would be to reach 3.5 million barrels a day output in the November time frame. I know companies are working on expanding takeaway capacity which in time will give us good project opportunities, but we were also seeing increased activity around Eagle Ford and Bakken and some of the other deposits in play. So, as we think about it going forward, we still would see oil and gas contributing into the mid-teens from a sales standpoint.

Okay. Thanks, guys.

Your next question comes from Jason Rodgers with Great Lakes Review. Your line is open.

Yes. Wonder if you could clarify a point you made earlier. The 2% to 3% impact, was that the impact of price on your sales growth in the quarter?

Yes. And so we said, we don't have maybe perfect visibility to that, so given the randomness of demand. If you think about a pure price metric, one-third of our SKUs repeat quarter-over-quarter, so you could get a true price calculation on that. Two-thirds either based on the randomness of the demand and the break fix and the longer cycle use of some of these parts, components or solutions or being a sub-component of a broader assembly, we don't get a perfect year-over-year price, but our view is it's probably in the 2% to 3% range on -- of the sales and could be growing as we look forward perhaps into the 3% to 4% or a little bit more. So hopefully clear.

Yes, I appreciate that. And then if you wouldn’t mind running through the performance by industry for the quarter, strength and weakness?

So, out of our 30, we would have 24 industries with increases higher than -- a little higher than the recent quarters, continued positives around primary and fabricated metals, machinery OEMs, oil and gas, I think, aggregate in chemicals inside, so, quite a few positives on that side. I think segments either close or demonstrating or being below a little in durable goods and coal mining would have been off slightly.

And then as far as the ASC 606, what's the expectations for the second quarter, the impact on EPS and maybe the second half of fiscal 2019?

It should have negligible impact as we move forward. I view it really more as a one-time and then just very modest noise as we think about the out quarters.

And then finally, I mean it looks like FCX is performing ahead of your expectations, is $0.06 accretion the right way to look at the contribution from that acquisition going forward $0.06 a quarter?

We have guided initially a 10 to 20 range with the slightly lower amortization [Indiscernible] that did move up a little bit, but that would be at the high end of that range, but certainly how I would continue to think about the contributions of FCX as we move forward.

All right. Thank you.

Your next question comes from Chris Dankert with Longbow Research. Your line is open.

Hi, morning, guys. Thanks for taking my question.

Good morning, Chris.

I guess looking at the fluid power backlog build 24.8% again impressive, another really strong quarter here. I guess is there anything in particular driving that organic strength or is it really truly broad-based at this point?

It's really broad-based, our fluid power businesses is broad-based across in segments and participation, and so we think look at the Company's groups, the geographies that they’re in and the end markets, we see quite a bit of positive developments. I think we continue to bring technology into these mobile and industrial offerings with our customers and that's part of building this backlog. We won't perfectly control when it all releases, but those are good developments across those groups.

Got it, got it. And kind of picking at that just a little bit further; there has been some concern about inventory pre-buying moving into destock in the latter half of the year, I guess. Can you just comment on how you guys view supply chain at this point. I know you're more MRO centric. So it's not quite the same dynamic as some of your vendors would be, but just any commentary you can give on the state of the supply chain and inventory here?

We continue to work with our key suppliers as they work through either relocations or capacity and such, and obviously plan well with our customers. So our view is we're not a big stocker or destocker in some of those sides. I mean obviously we plan the requirements around these projects and delivery time. So we continue constructive dialog with the key suppliers and I think all-in-all they're working well to stay up and serving what is a good productive in environment today.

Got it. Thanks. If I could just squeeze in one more.

Sure.

It's still early, but any chatter about extended downtime at customers into the holiday season here. We’re still kind of looking for pretty seasonal fiscal 2Q on the sales side for you guys?

I would say no. That I am picking up yet on extended downtime. I think obviously some continue to run and so that's through the holiday period. That's just normal business. Some will take plan time out which can also create opportunity for us right. Because those will be planned projects that they will implement and do while they are having downtime. But at this stage, I'm not hearing a lot of customers thinking about taking out capacity or extended down times based on any market conditions.

Sounds good. Thanks so much, guys.

You're welcome, Chris.

[Operator Instructions]. Your next question comes from Steve Barger with KeyBanc Capital Markets. Your line is open.

Hey, good morning, guys.

Good morning, Steve.

So, I want to talk about free cash flow if we could. Guidance $200 to $225, put up $9 million this quarter. I know seasonally that’s how it works sometimes, but can you talk about working capital performance in the quarter and how you see that for the remainder of the year and just if you're still comfortable with the prior guidance?

Still comfortable with the prior guidance, Steve, certainly some seasonality obviously as you’ve seen in the business with the cash flow. You’re typically centered around some of the inventory build. We did see that against -- again this quarter. The other factor that hurt us, we’ve made some very nice progress on our working capital initiatives, particularly our collections activity run through our shared services model continued to drive reductions in past due. Unfortunately, some of that was mass [ph] this quarter with the quarter ending on the Sunday, which hurt us to a degree in terms of this last couple days of collections, but would reaffirm the initial guidance provided there, certainly line of sight based on the projections for the business and the actions that we are working to deliver that.

And so the timing of the weekend notwithstanding, you don’t see any unusual or distressing performance in terms of payables from your customer base?

Not at all.

Okay.

We made progress in terms of past due reduction.

So -- and I guess this -- that just leads me to another question. I'm going to ask the similar to other questions have been asked, but investors have gotten very nervous about the sustainability of OEM markets and the cycle in general and much of your served end markets. Neil, you already alluded to the forward look, but can you provide any more specifics around customer conversations or whether you currently see any cracks in the demand picture as you go into calendar 2019?

No, as we look at 2019 dialog with customers, I think, and suppliers as they build their plans, especially those that are calendar year, I think optimism continues investment discussions and how to participate in stronger markets for growth. And so really don't have a lot talking about the kind of the other side or worrying about it turning, especially at this point.

That’s really good to hear. We're seeing distributors track mid-to-high single-digit organic growth as they benefit from what’s obviously a pretty solid cycle, you’re right there as well. When you think about how to maximize margin in this environment, are there more opportunities internally in terms of efficiency and cost control or do you see more opportunities to increase share of wallet with customers or maybe on the takeover business side, just how are you trying to play this to best effect?

So, I guess I given those choices. I'll say both as we think about it. I mean we’re working very hard at growing with current and gaining new customers and expanding our products and service offerings where we already do business, still big believer that customers are looking to consolidate their spend with fewer more capable suppliers. I think as customers also work through their labor and retirements of what has been some technical support staffs and teams, they are looking for qualified suppliers to support or takeover some of that work, which placed our value-add capabilities around our service centers, but also fluid power and especially flow control. And then further on the margin side, we just know with our data and some analytics, we can continue to improve in point of sale pricing and with customer mix still serving strongly small medium customers and the product mix as we move into expansionary products and those value-added services. So we feel like we've got many levers and while we've had tariffs and inflation coming at us, we feel like we're doing a very good job at understanding it, reflecting and acting with it and appropriately taking that to market, because I mean fundamentally I believe at the end as an end consumer, those prices have to come through to me or others, but they also have to go through to end businesses and end consumers. They can’t get stuck in the channel for a protracted period.

Sure. So you think customers understand that these price increases are coming in and in general are not fighting this necessarily more as you would expect?

I think it’'s hard not to -- in their own business as they sell and it's hard not to understand 232 and the impact on materials and then the varied list that continue from 301. And now we do a good job to show where there’s participation or perhaps where there’s not, but I think businesses and markets understand. We’re in an inflationary environment right now and part of that is driven by tariffs.

And so last question from me, when you think about the negative impacts of tariffs and just general inflation versus offsetting things from cost control or your moves in the new products and services, would you expect that full year incremental contribution margin exceeds what you put up in 2018 about 11% on a EBIT line? Is that a reasonable expectation?

Yes, so our view is yes, and we continue to look at our overall performance and volume leverage and we'll look at the quarter and feel like the core business has contributed well. FCX did as well, right. We haven't lapped all of those legacy fixed SG&A [ph] expenses yet, so we feel like together as we do that, we will be in the high teens from a leverage standpoint

Perfect. Thanks for the time.

Thanks, Steve.

At this time, I'm showing we have no further questions. I will now turn the call over to Mr. Schrimsher for any closing remarks.

At this point, I just want to thank everyone for joining us today. And we will look forward to seeing many of you throughout the quarter.

Thank you, ladies and gentlemen. This concludes today's conference. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.