Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Quarter One 2013 Akamai Technologies, Inc. Earnings Conference Call. My name is Patrick, and I will be your coordinator for today. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded for replay purposes. I would now like to turn the conference over to your host for today, Ms. Natalie Temple, Investor Relations. Please proceed.

Good afternoon, and thank you for joining Akamai's investor conference call to discuss our first quarter 2013 financial results. Speaking today will be Tom Leighton, Akamai's Chief Executive Officer; and Jim Benson, Akamai's Chief Financial Officer. Before we get started, please note that today's comments include forward-looking statements, including statements regarding revenue and earnings guidance. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties and involve a number of factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such statements. Additional information concerning these factors is contained in Akamai's filings with the SEC, including our annual report on Form 10-K and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. The forward-looking statements included in this call represent the company's view on April 24, 2013. Akamai disclaims any obligation to update these statements to reflect future events or circumstances. As a reminder, we will be referring to some non-GAAP financial metrics during today's call. A detailed reconciliation of GAAP and non-GAAP metrics can be found under the News and Events portion of the Investor Relations section of our website. Now let me turn the call over to Tom.

Thanks, Natalie, and thank you, all, for joining us today. Q1 was a great quarter for Akamai on both the top and bottom lines. Revenue in the first quarter was $368 million, up 15% year-over-year or 19% when adjusted for the ADS divestment and foreign currency movements. This result exceeded the high end of our guidance range due to better-than-expected traffic growth in our media business, particularly near the end of the quarter. We generated non-GAAP net income of $93 million or $0.51 per diluted share, exceeding the high end of our guidance range due to higher-than-expected revenue and strong operational performance. Non-GAAP EPS was up 42% year-over-year, in part due to a favorable tax rate and the recently introduced change in our depreciation methodology, both of which were factored into our Q1 guidance. Excluding these items, non-GAAP EPS was up 19% over Q1 of last year. We also had another solid quarter of cash flow generation, with $103 million of cash from operations. I'll be back in a few minutes to talk more about the key trends we're seeing in the marketplace and how they are driving our business. But first, let me turn the call over to Jim for the details on Q1. Jim?

Thank you, Tom. As we discussed in our last earnings call, there are 3 discrete items that will affect our 2013 reported results and growth rates: the ADS divestiture, which occurred in late January; the depreciation methodology change for our network assets; and a lower Q1 tax rate from the retroactive reinstatement of the 2012 federal R&D tax credit. As I walk you through the details of our very strong Q1 financial results, where appropriate, I will also provide you with Akamai's results for Q1 adjusted for these 3 items so you can better understand the operational performance in the quarter. Revenue came in above our guidance range at $368 million, up 15% year-over-year, with solid growth across the business, but most notably within our media delivery solutions. ADS accounted for less than $3 million of revenue in the first quarter. Adjusting for the impact of ADS and $3 million of currency headwinds, revenue grew 19% on a year-over-year basis. As a reminder, at last month's Investor Summit, we discussed 3 new solution categories: media delivery, performance and security; and service and support. We will no longer discuss revenue by industry vertical during the call, but we will continue to provide a breakout of revenue for each vertical on the Investor Relations section of our website. To ease in the transition of our new reporting, we plan to continue providing this vertical reporting breakout through the end of the 2013 fiscal year. Turning now to our new solution categories. Media delivery revenue was $181 million in the quarter, up 17% over Q1 of last year and up 4% sequentially, and was the primary driver of our revenue overachievement in the quarter. We saw strong traffic and revenue growth, notably near the end of the quarter. This result more than offset…

Thanks, Jim. I'd like to start by saying how great it was to see many of you at our Investor Summit in Cambridge last month. Whether you were there in person or tuned into the webcast, you heard us speak in depth about the 4 mega-trends that are shaping online business: cloud, mobile, video and security, and why we believe that Akamai is well positioned to benefit from these trends. For example, consider cybersecurity. It has become abundantly clear over the past several months that any company doing business online needs to be diligent about security. Online attacks are becoming larger in size, more frequent, more varied and sophisticated, and they are being launched on a global scale. For example, the attacks we witnessed while defending our U.S. banking customers during Operation Ababil came from servers located in more than 100 countries. These highly distributed attacks demonstrate why companies need to think about web security differently and also why we believe that they need the distinct advantage provided by our distributed platform. By leveraging the global scope and capacity of our distributed architecture, Akamai is uniquely able to mitigate not only the high-volume attacks that can overwhelm traditional web defenses, but also those aimed at compromising a web application through more subtle methods. At Akamai, we are also continually improving our services so that we can help our customers stay ahead of new and emerging modes of attack. Just this quarter, we unveiled a set of enhancements to our flagship security solution, Kona Site Defender. They're designed to provide the greater intelligence, flexibility and visibility required to better defend websites and applications against the latest threats. We also rolled out new interface functionality intended to ease integration with our customers' existing on-premise appliances and to support their relationships with managed…

[Operator Instructions] Gentlemen, your first question comes from line of Michael Turits with Raymond James. Michael Turits - Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division: Any chance you could give us a little bit more insight into what drove the upside in the traffic in the first quarter and what verticals or -- and why maybe it was unanticipated? And did you get the full amount of the carrier roll-off that you expected to it? Because we were estimating maybe that would hitch around $3 million. So just quickly answer to those 2 questions, and then I've got a follow-up.

So Michael, we saw very strong traffic growth, in particular amongst our largest and most strategic accounts. And we had a good start to the quarter, but really traffic began to accelerate in February and actually more prominently into March. And so really, what caused the overachievement was just a significant acceleration with some very large strategic accounts during the quarter. We saw strong growth across the board. But in particular, what drove the beat in the overachievement was growth in our large strategic accounts. As far as the media contracts that we talked about in Q1 and winding them down, those happened as we expected and the impact was about as we expected, with one notable exception, that we have one of those contracts that will remain on the Akamai platform through the end of Q2. So we did see about a $3 million Q4 to Q1 decline from those wind downs. But one of those contracts is actually going to remain through the end of Q2. So I think what we had talked about before was that we'd probably see another $1.5 million or so impact into Q2, and that will be muted a little bit because one of these contracts will stay on the platform. Michael Turits - Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division: Okay. And then just I guess my follow-up will be on the traffic growth that you've got, software download, as well as media in one bucket now. What was it? Was it media stuff or was it software download?

It was actually both. We saw good download volumes. We saw good kind of video growth. We saw -- I think as we've talked about in the past, we talked about that we're benefiting from some of the trends with social media and gaming. Gaming was another the quarter. We saw a good gaming quarter. So it was pretty strong traffic across the board, but what's most notable with a handful of large strategic accounts.

Your next question comes from line of David Hilal with FBR. David M. Hilal - FBR Capital Markets & Co., Research Division: Kind of a follow-up to that. I guess, your guide for 2Q was quite good versus where consensus was. So that strength in traffic that you saw in March, has that persisted into 2Q? And kind of the question there is, what's allowed you to give guidance that's nicely ahead of consensus? Is it that or is it something else?

No, it is that. I mean, certainly, we did better than we expected in Q1. So we expect some of that to be a continuation into Q2. But really, the range of our guidance of $368 million to $378 million, it's an expectation that we will see continued traffic growth similar to what we saw at the end of Q1. It will be more towards the lower end of the range if traffic growth maybe slows down a little bit, and it will be at the higher end of the range if we continue to see an acceleration in traffic. So that's really the driver of Q2 guide. David M. Hilal - FBR Capital Markets & Co., Research Division: Okay. And Tom, you had -- you laid out some ambitious plans from a sales headcount hiring for '13, and I wanted to get an update on where you stand. I think you wanted to add about 100 folks or so. So an update and then where you're deploying those folks?

Yes, we're making progress there. It was a little slower in Q1 than we had planned, but we're expecting to catch up on that in Q2. And the majority of that headcount is deployed outside North America, particularly in APJ, where we see strong greenfield opportunities.

Your next question comes from the line of Heather Bellini with Goldman Sachs.

I guess I had 2 questions for you. First, I was wondering if you could give us an idea of the leverage that you continue to exhibit on the gross margin line, and I know you said the revenue overage helped you out there. But how should we think about the efficiencies that you could still get out of the network, if you could share with us kind of how we should be thinking about that? And then I guess secondly, I was wondering how we should be thinking about the AT&T partnership. I know it was signed, obviously. Months back. But I'm just wondering if you've seen any contribution to your business thus far and kind of how we should be thinking about that helping for the full year.

Yes, we engaged on numerous projects to reduce our cost of serving traffic. Of course, we benefit from new hardware. We benefit from deeper relationships with our carrier partners. But we're also working on the software so that we get more bits delivered per kilowatt per CPU per square foot of co-lo, and there's a lot of projects we have working on that internally. We also are working on where we store certain content so that it's less costly in terms of the bandwidth to serve it, and those have been ongoing efforts. And we continue to invest heavily there because the return is so good as you've seen from our increasing gross margins over the past year. In terms of the AT&T relationship, it's strategic for us, very important. We're beginning to have traction now in terms of the AT&T enterprise sales force selling our solutions, including now in the security area. We think there's really great synergy between Akamai and AT&T, but it's just beginning in terms of the impact on revenues.

Your next question comes from line of Mike Olson with Piper Jaffray.

I just had a couple of security questions. Can you tell us how many customers are now on the security solutions? I think it was 400 at the end of Q4.

Yes, we're over 500 now, and we have a little over 130 with our flagship product, Kona Site Defender.

Okay. And then along those lines, you've alluded to this idea that security ARPU has been kind of artificially low as some of the customers had purchased point solutions in the past but increasingly moving towards the suite in the future. Is that starting to happen as far as ARPU moving higher? When do you expect to see that?

Yes, actually, we've seen ARPU continue to grow every quarter. So ARPU in the security space is growing. And as more and more customers leverage our flagship solution, Kona Site Defender, you will continue to see that growth. So ARPU has grown every quarter. It grew again in Q1, and our expectation is it will continue to grow as we have more of a mix shift of our security solutions towards Kona Site Defender.

Your next question comes from the line of Scott Kessler with S&P Capital IQ. Scott H. Kessler - S&P Equity Research: My primary question relates to your federal government business. Obviously, with the sequester now in place, I'm wondering if you've seen any or heard about any related impacts.

Yes, that's incorporated certainly into our guidance. And there are some impacts there, but we have long-term relationships on some of our most important contracts with the government. And the most important contracts are not impacted thus far by sequestration.

Your next question comes from the line of Aaron Schwartz with Jefferies. Aaron Schwartz - Jefferies & Company, Inc., Research Division: I had a follow-up question on the media traffic, obviously, as you pointed out, better than expected here in the quarter and it seems like the guide implies that as well. In your experience when this is -- the year has started off this strong, how does that play out through the year? Do you typically see some of your larger accounts have early renewals? Or how does that play out later in the year and is there an economic impact from that?

That's a good question. I mean, I think it varies by customer. Each customer has a different set of contracts, and I think we've had cases where customers burned through their commitments earlier. We're certainly not signaling that here. So I think what we're expecting here at least in the short term, that we're expecting to continue to see a nice acceleration going into Q2. As we talked about in the past, it's difficult at times to predict the rate and pace of traffic growth. And so whether that continues I think really depends upon the success of our customers' business models as we've talked about. And so I think we have a pretty good line of sight within the quarter. I think beyond that, it's kind of more difficult to call.

Your next question comes from the line of Colby Synesael with Cowen.

Great. 2 questions, if I may. First one, as it relates to the new Ion platform update that you guys put out, I was wondering if you could put some context around that perhaps in terms of what percentage of customers have already moved to that or what percentage of customers you're anticipating or what your revenue opportunity might look like or how much you are charging for that. Just something so we could start to kind of quantify that a little bit better. And then my second question had to do with partnerships. Last year, actually your Analyst Day back in, I guess it's what, December 2011, you made a big deal about partnerships with companies like Riverbed. I think you might have mentioned Qualcomm, if I'm not mistaken. And I'm just curious what the update is on those. Are you pushing or pulling away from those types of partnerships? Are you looking to do more of the things perhaps that you thought you would do with them by yourself now? Just curious where those types of things stand.

Yes, Ion was just released at the end of Q4. We're not releasing the exact number of customers that have purchased it, but we are seeing good traction across multiple geographies. We are seeing an upsell, so we're getting more revenue as customers move from DSA, which had been our flagship service and is still the majority of our revenue and the web experience division when they moved to Ion. The technology is a substantial improvement. As I talked about earlier, we're seeing substantial improvement in performance, both for landline access, but particularly interesting is the cellular access, which increasingly accounts for a larger portion of site visitors. In terms of the partnerships, the Riverbed partnership has not been successful, and that's unfortunate. The Qualcomm partnership is successful, and we are working with Qualcomm on embedding our technology into their solutions. And we'll be talking probably more about that later in the year. We do seek out partners. We have many large partners, and it's something that we look forward to doing more in the future and particularly in the carrier space as you noticed with the recent deals that we've concluded with Swisscom and Korea Telecom.

[Operator Instructions] Your next question comes from the line of Gray Powell with Wells Fargo.

Can you give us a sense as to the uptake on the new DSA product, Aqua Ion? I know you touched on it in the prepared remarks. Should we just think about the up-sell opportunity here hitting as customers come off of contract and renew? Or have you seen customers asking for the improved performance before contract renewal?

Yes, I think it's a combination. The performance improvements are strong, so it's an incentive to upgrade as soon as the technology is available. And there's a special incentive around Ion's ability to make the mobile and cellular experiences be so much better. A couple of years ago, maybe that didn't matter a lot as a tiny fraction of online commerce was done over mobile devices. But today, for example, in North America, 1/4 of e-commerce visits are now done from a mobile device, and that's expected to become over 50% in a couple of years. So the performance on mobile devices is critical. Aqua Ion is targeted at that, and the initial results have been very promising. And so customers are interested in that.

And I guess what I'd add is that -- so we launched it kind of in late Q4, so the product has only been in the market for several months here. So we've had reasonable uptake already. But as Tom said, you're going to have customers that are interested in time of renewal and some customers are interested even ahead of time. So we certainly have an early sample. We are seeing some from the early sample a nice uplift over DSA. I hesitate to give you percentage because it's going to vary, I think, by customer. But we've seen a nice, healthy uptake in ARPU with the Ion customers that we've seen thus far.

Your next question comes from line of Jeff Van Rhee with Craig-Hallum.

Great. A couple of brief ones here, guys. First on the -- back in the day, you gave new customer numbers a little better sense of how much revenue was coming from installed base versus new. Can you give us some more color there in terms of either new customer capture, revenue mix?

Yes. So I mean, we don't report kind of customer counting. Well, I think we stopped reporting that a couple of years ago. But I can tell you that we continue to get good traction with our existing customers, in particular, in selling our broader portfolio into them. I think one of the things we've talked about in the past, actually for the last couple of quarters, is some of the investments that we're making in incremental go-to-market and sales capacity is intended to drive more growth off the installed base and bring on more new customers. So certainly, we continue to do some of that. I'd say that more of our growth has come from our installed base. But as we grow our sales capacity, the expectation is that we are going to grow outside the installed base and do exactly what we've been able to do with our installed base, which is you start with the beachhead and you grow with multiple solutions thereafter. So that's kind of the strategy. And I think once we get the incremental sales capacity on board, I think you're going to start seeing more traction in that area.

Okay. And then on the CapEx side, pretty aggressive there. You just -- I think, you gave a few comments there as to what you might be doing. Could you just expand on that? You certainly put a fair amount of work in Q1. Are you going to do the same here in Q2?

Sure. I think it's important to maybe step back a little bit on CapEx and just understand where we spend CapEx in the company. So we talked about our model of being kind of called 13% to 16%, and we've been operating at around 16% with the media business profile that we have right now. So to think about that 16 points of CapEx, 10 of that is network CapEx. So think of that is building out the network. Roughly 4 of that in the past has been capitalized software, and 2 points have been kind of facility and IT-related spending. And so I think what you're seeing this year is we're -- our expectation is we're going to continue to drive down CapEx as a percent of revenue, actually in the network side, and where you're starting see an increase in CapEx is really more on capitalized software and some of the new solution categories that we talked about. But probably most notably is with all of the increase in headcount that we've seen, we are doing a fair amount of facility and IT-related build-out in 2013 to support the headcount growth in the company. We added 800 people in the company last year, and our expectation is we're going to add a similar amount this year. So we are building out facilities to accommodate that. So think of some of the CapEx that were building out in 2013 as -- I don't want say onetime in nature, but it's certainly not run rate CapEx by any means. It's building out to support the headcount growth in the business.

Your next question comes from line of Ed Maguire with CLSA. Edward Maguire - Credit Agricole Securities (USA) Inc., Research Division: At your Analyst Day, you discussed the growing importance of service and support, and that seems to be delivering the highest rate of growth among your new segments. Could you discuss how your current investment may impact that and growth expectations for the rest of the year relative to the rest of the business?

Sure, sure. I think it's important to kind of step back a little bit though. The service and support revenue stream is relatively small. It's less than 10% of the company's revenue, so we're growing that support stream from a very small base. And so what we've been able to do early on, we've only had this solution category literally for the company for, call it, 3 or 4 years. We've gotten very early penetration, and so some of the growth rates that you're seeing as a percentage basis are large. We don't expect that over the long term, that you're going to see growth rates stay in the 30s. But I will say that what we're seeing is very good traction at time of customer sale. And when we're selling a lead product, whether it be media or whether it be performance or whether it be security, we're having very good attach rate of services at the time of selling that core product offering, which bodes well for growth in that segment. The other thing is I would say that when you look at that kind of solution category not just for kind of revenue growth, but much more for stickiness from a customer perspective, we find that when we have customers that buy our services and support solution and actually have one of our service professionals engage in the account, that those customers tend to have higher NPS scores, those customers tend to have higher ARPUs and buy more of Akamai's broader services. So it has actually a multiplier effect when you actually have service and support in an account because it enhances the overall value of the account for Akamai.

Your next question comes from line of James Breen with William Blair. James D. Breen - William Blair & Company L.L.C., Research Division: You talked about the growth you had in Asia. I think you said 26%. Could you just talk about sort of the segment that this is coming from, where you're seeing this growth coming from? And then just as a follow-up to that, did you see any FX impact during the quarter?

Sure. So actually, Asia growth, when you adjust it for currency, was 35%. It was 26% as reported. And to your point about foreign exchange, we actually saw very good growth in our Japan market, and that Japan market is going to -- we've all been following the foreign exchange market, at least to some extent, that the yen has weakened significantly. So that is outlined in our Q2 guidance. We outlined that we're expecting kind of a $2 million sequential headwind. That's largely driven by the weakening yen. But we're pleased with the growth rate in Asia Pacific. I think that Asia Pacific growth will be impacted on an as-reported basis from foreign exchange likely in the near term, but we've seen good traction there. We continue to make investments there. I think some of the headcount and sales capacity that Tom talked about, a lot of that is going into our Asia Pacific markets.

Your next question comes from the line of Sterling Auty with JPMorgan. Sterling P. Auty - JP Morgan Chase & Co, Research Division: Back on the media delivery side, can you give us a sense, you've had some onetime items like the Olympics that had benefited, there's some questions over what March Madness might have done for you in the quarter, as well as when you talk about giving more color into that acceleration at the end of the quarter? Is there any other color you can give in terms of the type of content, whether it was more high-definition shows that are hitting the net, like Paul, in the past, has described as being driver of volumes?

Yes, I mean, I can start and maybe Tom can offer some other points. So I'll start with March Madness. March Madness in any one event is not a needle mover on revenue in the quarter. So while it was a very good event, it was a well-viewed event, that is not the driver of revenue in the quarter. What you saw was just a nice acceleration. And again, it was across our big accounts and smaller accounts, but most notably our larger accounts. And you saw it software downloads. You saw it in gaming. You saw it in video delivery. So it was pretty much across the board, so it isn't in one area. But I think we're continuing to see traction in all of those areas. Some of those areas tend be lumpier than others, like software downloads. But I think what we've seen is actually even in the software download area, that as more and more devices get out there, there's actually more and more software download that happen on a more frequent basis. But it was pretty much across the board in social media accounts, in gaming giving accounts and in kind of large technology customers.

Your next question comes from the line of Jennifer Lowe with Morgan Stanley.

It's actually Jon Parker calling in for Jennifer Lowe. Obviously, we continue see and gain some nice traction in security business, and we saw some nice synapsis on the carrier side over the past couple of months. How should we think about the ramp and sort of the continued ramp in contribution of those businesses throughout the year? Any of those that can be big enough to add a couple of points of growth? Or how should we think about those?

Yes, I mean, so I'll start with security. So security, we believe, is going to be a large business for the company and actually a very significant contributor to the company's longer-term growth. I think we've talked about that security was a little over $40 million business in 2012, so I think it will be a contributor to growth in 2013 because it's our fastest-growing product category for the company. And so it certainly will have a contribution for the overall company growth. But it's still a relatively small revenue stream, rapidly growing but a relatively small revenue stream. On the carrier front, the carrier front, we're just getting into the license and managed carrier space. So we're not expecting in 2013 to have any meaningful contribution of revenue for the carrier business. But it's important to remember with the carrier business, that there's multiple benefits that we can get from our engagement with carriers. One is our ability to potentially sell them managed or licensed CDN offering, which becomes a revenue stream for Akamai. In some cases, it also becomes a go-to-market channel for Akamai ala the relationship that we have with AT&T and the most recent relationship we now have with Swisscom. And then a third area that we get benefit from as we develop deeper relationship with the carriers, we can get more deeply embedded in their network. And it allows, one, the end users to have better performance, but it allows Akamai to get better network cost efficiencies as a result of that deeper relationship. So we actually get benefit from a revenue stream, and we get benefit in these 2 other areas. And they do manifest themselves, some of them manifest themselves in kind of a stabilizing or expanding gross margin, and some of them manifest themselves in giving Akamai a new channel of distribution to sell our value-added services.

Your next question comes from line of Donna Jaegers with D.A. Davidson. Donna Jaegers - D.A. Davidson & Co., Research Division: Great. And I have a great follow-up on your last answer, Tom. The reseller percentage of revenue was down to 20% versus 22% last year, and yet you've signed these other carriers. So do you expect that to pick up over the next few quarters? Or was there something with maybe currency hitting the 20% number?

Yes, I mean, I think it's important when you look at the channel, we actually saw an acceleration in our channel revenue through 2012. A fair amount of our revenue for our ADS business went through the channel. So the 23% that we saw in Q4, that had the ADS business in there. So if you pull that out, 23% becomes a little bit less than 22%. The channel business did not grow as fast as our direct business. And really, the large driver of our direct business, as I said, was we saw very strong growth in our large strategic accounts, and that outweighed the growth that we saw in the channel business. But we do expect these relationships with the carriers over time to result in the channel business growing at a faster pace over time. It's not going to happen necessarily next quarter. But over time, our expectation is our revenue mix that is today, call it in the 20% to 22% range, should be a much higher percentage of the company's revenue. But over a period of time, that's not going to happen overnight.

Your next question comes from line of Chad Bartley with Pacific Crest.

I hope to ask you a different question around the media traffic and revenue, just to get a better picture of played out. Was that simply your existing customer traffic outperforming or was there anything unexpected from those existing customers? Or was there a competitive share of shift in the customer wins, the re-acceleration after the slowdown in Q4 and your commentary around difficult comps and all that? Definitely, the re-acceleration is surprising, so hoping to get a little more detail, if you can.

Sure. I'm not sure I can offer much more than what I already covered. As we said, that the traffic acceleration would actually surpass our expectations as well. It wasn't in any one area. We saw strong traffic growth pretty much across the board, but it was -- we saw, in particular, where it surpassed our expectations was largely in some large strategic accounts, some in the social media space, some in the gaming space, some kind of in the software download space. So we saw it pretty much across the board. And I think, as we've talked about, is that it's difficult to call the rate and pace of traffic acceleration. I think we can safely look at like a floor for traffic. But I think at times, you start to see traffic accelerate based on customers' business models improving. So that's kind of the net of what we saw in the quarter. And just one point I did want to make on my security comment, I made a comment that the security business in 2012 was $40 million. Security business in 2012 was actually $20 million. But I think what we've talked about is that the rate and pace of growth in our security business throughout 2012 accelerated throughout the year. So we had a very significant run rate going into 2013. But the actual number for 2012 was a little over $20 million.

Thanks very much. We look forward to talking with you all next quarter.

Ladies and gentlemen, that concludes today's conference. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect. Have a great day.