Good morning. And welcome to the Aldeyra Therapeutics First Quarter 2020 Financial Results Conference Call. After the speaker’ remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] At this time, I would like to turn the call over to Mr. Joshua Reed, the company’s Chief Financial Officer. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, and good morning, everyone. On the call with me are Dr. Todd Brady, Aldeyra’s President and Chief Executive Officer; and David McMullin, our Chief Commercial Officer. Todd will begin with an overview of our recent highlights and upcoming clinical milestones. I will discuss our first quarter financial results. Todd will make some concluding comments and then we will take your questions. Please note that this morning’s conference call contains forward-looking statements regarding future events and the future performance of Aldeyra. Forward-looking statements include statements regarding the timing of planned clinical trial initiations, Aldeyra’s possible or assumed future results of operations, expenses and financial position, business strategies and plans, research, development and commercial plans or expectations, trends, market sizing, competitive position, industry environment and potential growth opportunities, among other things. These statements are based upon the information available to the company today. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, clinical site availability, staffing and patient recruitment have been negatively affected, and the time lines to complete our clinical trials may be delayed. Aldeyra assumes no obligation to update these statements as circumstances change. Future events and actual results could differ materially from those projected in the company’s forward-looking statements, including the current and potential future impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business, results of operations and financial position. Additional information concerning factors that could cause results to differ materially from our forward-looking statements are described in greater detail in the company’s press release issued this morning containing financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2020, and the company’s filings with the SEC. And with that, I will turn the call over to Todd.

Thank you, Josh. Good morning to everyone, and thank you for joining us today. In just a few short weeks, COVID-19 has affected virtually every aspect of our lives. On behalf of everyone at Aldeyra, I want to extend our thoughts to those that have been touched by this devastating illness. Over the past two months, it’s been inspiring to see the selfless commitment of doctors, nurses and other health care professionals working around the clock to extinguish the virus and it’s also been encouraging to witness the collaboration of companies across our industry as they attempt to solve this global health care crisis. Along these lines, I want to thank our own employees for their tireless efforts over the past months regarding our initiatives to treat COVID-19 infection, which I will discuss later in this call. From Aldeyra’s perspective, although, the stay-at-home orders and other government-mandated measures have affected certain of our clinical enrollment time lines, we believe we remain well-positioned to execute on our strategic objectives. As noted in this morning’s press release, we concluded the first quarter with $61.4 million in cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities, and are updating our guidance to extend our projected cash runway into 2022. On our fourth quarter call, we discussed the strategic prioritization of our late-stage ocular disease programs, including our trials in dry eye disease, allergic conjunctivitis and proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Since our fourth quarter call, two events have prompted us to accelerate the development of our systemic disease programs with ADX-629, a first-in-class orally available and irreversible covalent inhibitor of pro-inflammatory RASP. First, was the potential applicability of ADX-629 to mitigate respiratory compromise in patients infected with COVID-19. In preclincal models, ADX-629 and structural analog reproxalap have demonstrated activity in cytokine release syndrome, which is thought to lead to…

Thank you, Todd. For the three months ended March 31, 2020, we reported a net loss of $9.9 million, compared with a net loss of $15.6 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2019. Net loss per share was $0.34 for the quarter ended March 31, 2020, compared with $0.58 for the same period last year. Losses have resulted from the cost of Aldeyra’s clinical trials and research and development programs, as well as from general and administrative expenses. Research and development expenses were $6.6 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2020, compared with $7.8 million for the same period in 2019. The decrease of $1.2 million is primarily related to the decreases in clinical and preclinical development and manufacturing costs. Expenses for the 2019 period also included $6.6 million of in-process research and development expenses incurred in connection with the acquisition of Helio Vision. General and administrative expenses were flat at $3 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2020, compared with March 31, 2019. Increases in personnel-related costs, including stock-based compensation were offset by a decrease in legal and other miscellaneous administrative costs. In Q1 of 2020, total operating expenses were $9.6 million, compared with total operating expenses of $17.4 million for the same period in 2019. As Todd noted, cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities were $61.4 million as of March 31, 2020. Based on current operating plans, we believe that our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities at March 31 will be sufficient to fund currently anticipated operating expenses into 2022, including completion of the Phase 3 INVIGORATE trial for reproxalap, completion of the Phase 3 clinical trials of ADX-629 and COVID-19-associated respiratory compromise, atopic asthma and psoriasis, the commencement of 1 or more additional clinical trials in dry eye disease, subject to the outcome of the FDA meeting scheduled for mid-year 2020, and the continuation of Part 1 of the adaptive Phase 3 clinical trial in proliferative vitreoretinopathy contingent on patient enrollment. Before concluding, I want to let you know that next month we will be presenting and hosting one-on-one meetings at the Jefferies Virtual Health Care Conference. Details will be posted on the Investors and Media section of our website. For those investors who are participating, we look forward to meeting with you. Now, I will hand the call back over to Todd for closing comments.

Thank you, Josh. From my perspective a key take away from this morning’s call is that we are ramping our systemic inflammatory disease program, with a new comprehensive clinical initiative that complements our late-stage pipeline in ocular disease. The systemic disease initiative stimulated by the opportunity to potentially address a major morbidity associated with COVID-19 infection and bolstered by Phase 1 data demonstrating safety, tolerability and target engagement, creates a number of new potential catalysts for Aldeyra in the coming quarters and we are excited about the path forward for ADX-629. As always, we remain committed to executing efficiently on our strategic plan and bringing to market novel therapies that improve the lives of patients with serious unmet medical needs. With that, Joshua, Dave and I will be happy to take your questions. Operator?

Okay. [Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from Yigal Nochomovitz from Citi. Your line is open.

This is Samantha on for Yigal. Just want to be sure. Can you hear me okay?

Yeah. Loud and clear, Samantha.

Okay. Okay. I just wanted to start with the cash runway extension into 2022. What cost-saving measures have you implemented that factor into the extension, especially given the announcement that you are going to have three new ADX-629 studies starting in the second half of this year?

Yeah. Thank you, Samantha. As you might expect, we frequently look at our capital and we are pretty fiscally responsible. What I would say is that, given some of the trial delays, we sort of looked at our portfolio and looked at the pace of spend over time and so I think that contributes to sort of the extension of the runway, in addition to some changes from an infrastructure standpoint. With respect to ADX-629 in development there, I think, it’s important to understand that the Phase 2 trials are not very expensive at all. So this is not a huge capital drain.

Got it. That’s helpful. And then sticking with 629, what are -- should we -- what are you envisioning or in terms of patient numbers and duration of treatment for these studies, particularly the autoimmune and allergy studies and what would you think would be sufficient for you to gain proof-of-concept in those indications?

Great question, Samantha. I think our plan is as the year progresses to detail those trial designs. At this point, I think it’s fair to assume that these would be Phase 2a like proof-of-concept studies, generally including 30 patients or less. And the idea is to demonstrate activity of 629, not only from a clinical standpoint, but also from a biomarker standpoint. So, for example, in atopic asthma, a sputum analysis for cell counts would be an interesting biomarker. In psoriasis, transcription of inflammatory cytokines from biopsies would be an interesting example. In COVID-19 infected patients with respiratory compromise, not only clinical parameters, including time to mechanical ventilation or time on mechanical ventilation, but also levels of RASP in plasma and cytokine profiles in plasma. So these are the kinds of studies we are envisioning. The idea is to more or less comprehensively test ADX-629 across those three different kinds of inflammation, which I think, will guide us in terms of going forward into larger Phase 2 trials, which I hope we will be in a position to announce early next year.

Got it. Thank you. That’s very helpful. Thanks for taking my question.

The next question will come from Louise Chen from Cantor. Your line is open.

Hi. Good morning. This is Carvey on for Louise. Just a few questions here, there are several dry eye programs you have seen. What differentiates your asset from the other? What -- in your trial design, which show the competitive advantages of the product versus others? Secondly, how do you think about the slowdown in ophthalmology due to COVID-19? Do you think the industry can adapt to telemedicine or other ways of treating new and existing patients if things persist here? And lastly, how should we think about OpEx in 2020? Thank you.

Great. Why don’t I turn the call over to Dave McMullin to comment on the competitive advantages in dry eye and the initial data that we are seeing regarding the impact of telemedicine on ophthalmology procedures and prescribing. Dave, are you on the line?

Yeah. I am here, Todd. So with reproxalap, we are excited in our development thus far because we have seen a number of advantages versus existing treatments. Reproxalap has shown the ability to address symptoms very broadly and that’s exciting because we know that dry eye disease is largely a symptom-driven disease. That’s what motivates the patients to go into the physician and talk with the physician. So on the sign front we also see broad improvements in the eye with treatment of reproxalap. And signs are important because they help you assess the health of the eye. But from a day-to-day clinical perspective, they don’t take as prominent a role as the management of the symptoms. They are not the motivating factor that drives the patient in to the doctor. And reproxalap has also shown a rapid effect on both of those. So it’s symptoms and signs and so it’s that rapidity of improvement, as well as the broadness of the effect that we believe will give reproxalap an advantage for the treatment of dry eye disease. In terms of the impact of the current situation on the current patient doctor dynamic. That’s something that’s obviously evolving. We do know that if you look at what’s happened in the marketplace, which we have been following on a weekly basis, initially one of the things that these chronic treatments have a benefit on is that they can be prescribed and refilled very easily, remotely. And in fact, prescriptions on some of these -- on the two existing chronic treatments went up in March when the disruption really started. Now in April, we do see that coming down, but we have seen also the AAO come out with some guidance on how eye care professionals can address the needs of patients through virtual visits. And if you think of dry eye disease in particular where the symptomatology is really that motivating factor, those things can be reported by the patient in a telemedicine study very effectively, when you get into the signs of the disease, you will need to visit a doctor and have a test done. So I would expect that the management of dry eye disease may focus more on the symptoms, in the short-term as the system tries to leverage and utilize a telemedicine and then manage the signs in a more spread out fashion that would allow for an appropriate type of approach given the pandemic.

Yeah. And thank you, Dave. Before I turn the call over to -- the question over to Josh to talk about OpEx, I just want to reiterate a couple of things. First is, we -- as we said on the call, continue to believe that the symptom profile of our drug in dry eye disease is best-in-class. I think it would be difficult to find another therapeutic agent that demonstrates symptom control, like that we have depicted currently in our corporate deck, for example. The second thing I want to say is that, we are not a nasal spray. I don’t think you will find in any rigorous market research that patients are clamoring for nasal sprays. We are a topical agent for relief of dry eye syndrome, a topical ocular. And the second thing I would say is that we are not a steroid. Reproxalap is not a steroid, which, as I mentioned in the call, cannot be used chronically, due to the risk of potentially very serious side effects. So I think in addition to the rapid onset of activity to what we believe represents a best-in-class symptomatic profile, which is, by the way, what the very vast majority of patients and physicians care about, plus the novel mechanism of action relative to other late-stage assets in dry eye disease positions reproxalap quite nicely. Josh, let me turn it over to you to comment on OpEx.

Yeah. Just regarding OpEx, a slowdown in enrollment will lead to lower expenses and that will give us the ability to fund some near-term catalysts, specifically those items that we talked about earlier related to ADX-629.

Okay. All right. Thank you so much. That’s really helpful. Thank you.

[Operator Instructions] Your next question comes from Esther Hong from Janney. Your line is open.

Hi. Good morning and thanks for taking my questions. So on ADX-629, there are multiple potential indications, of psoriasis and atopic asthma, how will you prioritize which program moves forward, assuming that the Phase 2a’s are successful. Is there a way to streamline the programs? And then, my second question is on ADX-2191. Can you discuss the potential of that for primary intraocular lymphoma? Thanks.

Thanks, Esther. In terms of asthma and psoriasis, both of those diseases represent different flavors of inflammation. And the intent of the program we have initiated is to demonstrate activity of ADX-629 and more broadly RASP inhibition as a novel mechanism in those different types of inflammation, whether we pursue psoriasis and asthma as indications, I think, depends on the strength of the data. In that, there are -- if there are signals that are generated from those clinical trials, then I think, the company has considerable optionality in terms of moving forward in those particular diseases or moving forward in diseases that are TH1 or TH2 cytokine related or autoimmune and allergy related that are different from asthma and psoriasis. Examples may include diseases such as chronic cough or alcoholic hepatitis or minimal change disease, which is a rare form of renal inflammation that affects children and adolescents. There are many kinds of inflammation that relate to TH1 and TH2 diseases. I think most experts would agree that asthma and psoriasis are superb proof-of-concept indications to study in Phase 2a trials. But in terms of ultimate indications that we will pursue internally, we are leaving our options open. They may include psoriasis and asthma, depending on the strength of the results, as I mentioned, but also may include related diseases that relate to the mechanisms in which we are attempting to demonstrate activity. PBR is one of many indications that I think are addressable by ADX-2191. Ocular lymphoma, which we mentioned this morning, is a rare but serious form of cancer that generally affects the retina or the uvea and is treated almost exclusively with methotrexate, which is the active ingredient of ADX-2191. There is a very long history of the use of methotrexate for primary intraocular lymphoma. Unfortunately, today that cancer is treated by compounding methotrexate. The pharmacies at hospitals will essentially make up their own formulation of methotrexate for intravitreal injection into the eye, which as you can imagine, has many drawbacks. So the intent would be to investigate our own novel formulation of methotrexate for intravitreal injection ADX-2191 for use in ocular lymphoma. And one question is the extent of clinical data, if any that Aldeyra would need to generate for filing and that’s something we are exploring over the next several months. So I expect you will hear more from us regarding ocular lymphoma as an additional indication for ADX-2191 over the next quarter or two.

Great. Thank you.

.:

Your next question comes from Matthew Cross from Jones Trading. Your line is open.

Hey, guys. Good morning and thanks for providing the comprehensive update. Just wanted to ask a couple here, first off, could you kind of give us an update on what you are hoping to pitch to the FDA at this Type C meeting for dry eye and RENEW Part 2? I guess there’s been a little bit of discussion on this call, I think, about -- there’s another competitor in the space that just submitted an NDA using ocular discomfort alone as the primary efficacy measure and hyperemia as a secondary sign endpoint. So do you think that the FDA will insist on the usage of fluorescein nasal staining as a co-prime, excuse me, co-primary going forward versus focusing on ocular dryness or what other kind of tweaks to the staining time frame assessments, dosing schedule, et cetera, are you thinking right now, you will put forward to get the best clinical results and potential label?

Matt, that’s something we have been thinking a great deal about, as you can imagine. Typically, the FDA has required symptoms and signs to be demonstrated for approval in dry eye disease. As you know, we have now demonstrated in two adequate and well controlled trials clear symptomatic control, we would argue best-in-class symtomatic control in dry eye disease. And thus, we have requested and received a scheduling for a Type C meeting in the middle of this year with the agency to discuss our remaining NDA requirements. One question is whether signs are required. One question is if signs are required, what kinds of signs are required. I will say, I do not think, I do not have any evidence that the agency has historically required a particular sign, such as staining or redness. The other comment I will make in terms of recent programs. I do think that ocular discomfort was a primary end point because the symptom had been missed on a prior trial and if sponsors are required to achieve statistical significance twice on a symptom and a sign, one way to do that is to run more than two clinical trials in Phase 3 and I think that was what was happening in the case that you referenced here. Obviously, we are optimistic going into the FDA meeting. We wouldn’t have requested the meeting otherwise and we are positively surprised with the strength of our symptom data, which we have confirmed now in two trials and we are eager to have that discussion. And as we mentioned, we will be updating the street on the remaining clinical requirements for NDA once we have reviewed feedback from that meeting.

Got it. Okay. And I am looking forward to the feedback later in the year. And then just had one more around the COVID program starting in the third quarter. I guess, I am curious, how much of a need do you anticipate in that time frame for an additional agent for COVID complications, again, in the third quarter and do you have any kind of concerns about enrollment beginning in that time frame, I guess, currently, we are seeing some of these leading clinical trials report a shortage of patients in certain geographies as this kind of subsides due to preventative measures and natural immunity. So just kind of thoughts on the use of cash for this program in that time frame and any kind of enrollment challenges you might face?

Enrollment is always a question mark in any disease. I can tell you, we have been on the phone with representatives of government agencies this week and they are in general predicting that COVID will not go away, that there will not be a long-term shortage of patients and we would agree. I don’t think we have a panacea for COVID in the pipeline as of yet. I think there are always -- there’s always room for novel agents with novel mechanisms in any inflammatory disease, psoriasis, asthma and COVID included. So we -- at least based on the preclinical evidence that we have and have disclosed in the press release in March about broad-based cytokine reduction, which by the way, seems to lead to respiratory compromise and the requirement for mechanical ventilation in COVID. And the fact that at least reproxalap, which is essentially a structural homolog of ADX-629, has shown clear evidence in animal models of acute respiratory distress syndrome of activity, we are optimistic about the potential for ADX-629, which because it is orally administered, can be administered to patients immediately after hospital admission, could be administered via nasogastric tube to patients that are on ventilators and can be administered to patients after weaning off ventilators and even discharge. So our intent is to enroll patients at admission with evidence of respiratory compromise, which we would define as a hypoxia and pulmonary radiographic involvement and treat them through the hospital stay up to about 28 days. And I think that for agents like that there’s still plenty of room. Enrollment, as you know, Matt, is always very difficult to predict, but I don’t think anyone at Aldeyra or in terms of the government agencies, we have been in touch with are predicting that COVID is going to go away anytime soon.

Okay. No. Yeah. That’s great additional detail on kind of the program and the opportunity there. I tend to agree and looking forward to seeing how all these new programs progress. Thanks, guys.

Yeah.

I have no further questions in queue. I turn the call back to Dr. Brady for closing remarks.

Thank you, Operator. I’d like to thank you all again for joining us today, and as always, we look forward to continue to update you on our progress. Thank you.

Thank you, everyone. This will conclude today’s conference call. You may now disconnect.