Hello, and welcome to the Alkami's Third Quarter 2025 Financial Results Conference Call. My name is Andrew, and I will be your operator for today's call. [Operator Instructions] This call is being recorded on Thursday, October 30, 2025. I would now like to turn the call over to Steve Calk. Steve, you may begin.

Thank you, operator. And with me on today's call are Alex Shootman, Chief Executive Officer; and Bryan Hill, Chief Financial Officer. During today's call, we may make forward-looking statements about guidance and other matters regarding our future performance. These statements are based on management's current views and expectations and are subject to various risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may be materially different. For a summary of risk factors associated with our forward-looking statements, please refer to today's press release and the sections in our latest 10-K entitled Risk Factors and Forward-Looking Statements. Statements made during the call are being made as of today, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise these statements. Also, unless otherwise stated, financial measures discussed on this call will be on a non-GAAP basis. We believe these measures are useful to investors in the understanding of our financial results. A reconciliation of the comparable GAAP financial measures can be found in our earnings press release and in our filings with the SEC. I'd now like to turn the call over to Alex.

Good afternoon, and thank you all for joining us. I am pleased to report that Alkami continued to deliver strong revenue and profit results in the third quarter of 2025, which I plan to discuss. But first, I'd like to announce that Alkami has selected a new Chief Financial Officer to succeed Bryan Hill, who previously announced his intention to retire. Also, as discussed earlier this year, Alkami entered into an agreement with Bryan in which he will be available in a consulting role to the company for some time in the future. Alkami's new CFO is Cassandra Hudson. Cassandra brings to Alkami over 20 years of experience building, leading and advising companies through rapid growth, capital market transactions, international expansion and M&A activity. Most recently, she served as CFO of StackAdapt, a leading advertising and marketing technology company. Prior to that, she was CFO of EngageSmart, where she guided the company through a successful IPO and drove meaningful growth in both revenue and profitability. Earlier in her career, she spent 12 years at Carbonite in a series of finance leadership roles, ultimately serving as Chief Accounting Officer and Vice President of Finance. Cassandra comes on board next week, and I'm looking forward to the investment community spending time with her in the coming quarters. I'm grateful that Cassandra said yes to Alkami and excited to have her on our executive team. Turning to our business results. In the third quarter of 2025, Alkami grew revenue over 31% increased adjusted EBITDA to $16 million and exited the quarter with 21.6 million registered users on the Alkami platform, up 2.1 million from the prior year quarter. Q3 2025 was also a strong sales quarter, equal to our best Q3 ever. We added 10 new clients on our digital banking platform, 6…

All right. Thanks, Alex, and let's do this one last time. Shall we? Good afternoon, everyone. In the third quarter of 2025, we achieved total revenue of $113 million, representing year-over-year growth of 31.5% and organic growth exceeding 20%. We continue to improve adjusted EBITDA to $16 million compared to $8.3 million in the year ago quarter, further underscoring the operating leverage of our financial model. Subscription revenue grew 31.5% in the third quarter and represented 96% of total revenue. We increased ARR over 31% and exited the quarter at $449 million. We currently have approximately $67 million of ARR in backlog for implementation, the majority of which will occur over the next 12 months. Included in our backlog are 37 new digital banking clients, representing 1.7 million digital users. We exited the quarter with 291 live clients and 21.6 million registered users on our digital banking platform, representing registered user growth of approximately 2.1 million or 11% compared to last year. Over the last 12 months, we implemented 32 financial institutions. Because of the long-term nature of our contracts, we have 3 to 4 quarters of visibility into upcoming client attrition. In the last 3 quarters of 2025, 3 clients left our platform, representing less than 1% of ARR and 2 clients were merged with existing Alkami clients. Over the long term, we model digital banking ARR churn at 2% to 3% per year, which we have historically outperformed. We ended the quarter with an RPU of $20.83, up 19% compared to a year ago, driven by the acquisition of MANTL and add-on sales success. Excluding MANTL, RPU increased 7% over the prior year. We continue to see broad-based demand across our product portfolio. This is reflected in our sales pipeline, new client wins, client renewal success, our ability…

[Operator Instructions] Your first question is from Andrew Schmidt from KeyBanc Capital Markets.

Your final call here at Alkami, Bryan. Congratulations on the transition. It was great working with you from the IPO up until today. So congrats.

Yes. Great working with you, Andrew.

I wanted to just maybe just go back to what you said, Bryan, on the organic growth for the fourth quarter. Obviously, we saw the revenue growth, the outlook come down just a little bit. But I think you mentioned that organic growth is actually accelerating. Maybe you can dig into that a little bit, maybe something that's inorganic or MANTL related that's affecting the outlook, but that would be a good place to start.

No, that's a great question. Look, first, I'm very proud that 19 quarters consecutive at Alkami as a public company, we've either met or exceeded both our revenue and adjusted EBITDA guidance. So that's a mark that many companies cannot say. But as we think about our transition of revenue growth from Q3 to Q4, we've said this many times, but the timing of implementations during the year makes a big difference on any one quarter's year-over-year growth. As an example, if you compare the first 9 months of new logo implementations in '25 to '24, we actually had approximately 100,000 more in the first 9 months of 2024. But then when you look ahead to Q4 in 2025, Q4 is really our greatest implementation quarter. We're going to have close to 350,000 more users that we implement in Q4 this year versus last year. So that transition provides us the step-up in organic revenue growth in Q4, both on the top line for revenue, but also for ARR.

And just to add to that, the schedule of when we're doing the implementations depends a lot on when the customer wants to do the implementations, right. And so that creates, as you said, Bryan, sometimes those dislocations between the quarterly compares.

That's right.

Got it. So implementation schedule, but underlying organic growth is healthy and accelerating. Understood. Maybe just a quick question on the competitive environment. So obviously, well-documented transition from a large core provider announced this week. Wondering if -- I know I understand they're more on the core side, but do you see any benefit from that just in terms of folks coming to you and maybe just reevaluating the tech stack in general, looking for advanced digital banking tools, et cetera. Just curious if that's a benefit for you. And just if you have any other comments on just the overall environment that you want to share, that would be helpful.

I don't think for us, any particular company's results in a quarter make a difference in the buying behavior necessarily. What we do see in the bank market, and we've talked about this before, the credit union market has historically been a best-of-breed market. It's a buyer who is used to combining a digital banking platform that's different than their core provider. The community bank market has not been that kind of market. The community bank market was a market that very much bought digital banking from its core provider. And Andrew, that's the biggest thing that we're seeing change is the opening of momentum of people saying, I'm going to actually have a different digital banking application than my core provider. And that's why it's so important, what I shared in my opening remarks of, look, since the beginning of the year, we have brought 14 banks live and 8 of them are on a core that we consider to be our largest market opportunity. So in summary, no particular quarterly result changes the customers' buying behavior. The most important thing that we're seeing in the community bank market is the beginning of the willingness to buy best-of-breed instead of suite.

And Andrew, keep in mind, out of the 250 million digital users that comprise our addressable market, less than 30% of those are on a contemporary platform. And so the decision to switch to a contemporary platform such as an Alkami, what we've seen through many different disruptions in this market, whether it was SVB, high interest rates, you name the issue, the demand has remained consistent through that. So if a provider in the market is experiencing problems for different reasons, whatever the case may be, that doesn't really expect the fundamental drivers of what's causing the change. And then we introduced the MANTL acquisition. We combine that with our online banking platform as well as our data and marketing analytics solution, and we think that's a game changer in the market. As we pointed out on the call, we now have 44 shared clients with MANTL under contract, and we only had 15 when we completed the acquisition. That's significant progress. We think that progress is going to continue as the market continues to understand the power of bringing these 3 primary platforms together. It's a differentiator for them. It's a moat and a differentiator for us.

Your next question is from Patrick Walravens from Citizens.

This is Austin Cole on for Pat Walravens. And let me extend my congratulations to you, Bryan, as well on your retirement. I wanted to ask -- touch on that topic of disruptions. And I was just kind of wondering if you're hearing anything out there kind of regarding AI and the ability to kind of use some of these tools to build potentially some digital applications and if that's something that's resonating out there in the market at all or not so much?

We actually just had our Customer Advisory Board -- this is Alex. We had our Customer Advisory Board last week for several hours. And probably half of that conversation was how they're either using generative AI or using agents and the different use cases that they have. And so every single financial institution is either using or experimenting with either agentic technology or with generative technology. None of them think about building their own software with agent technology. Their view is -- the level of complexity in terms of building the software, integrating that into different core technologies is not something that is on their radar screen. And once again, the thing to remember is even if 6 different customers have the same exact core the age of those cores and the way that the core is designed is all 6 of those will be completely different implementations. So once again, a lot of interest in use cases for generative AI and for Agentic AI, but nobody is talking about building their own system.

Okay. And then if I could just follow up quickly. When you kind of look at your own digital banking solutions and those potential use cases, where are maybe some of those areas that customers would be interested in seeing elements of kind of AI or agentic workflows? And could that be -- could that bolster the product set?

Yes. Well, first of all, there's -- we have AI in our technology today. We use AI in our data and marketing platform to create precise audience segments for clients. We have AI embedded into chat products that are in our products. But if you're specifically talking about either agentic AI or generative AI, one of the things that I mentioned in the prepared remarks, so today, we have a software development kit or an SDK in which a client can build functionality that extends Alkami. Today, what they have to do is they have to have a developer that builds that functionality. What we've done is we've taken all of the code that's ever been submitted into Alkami. For example, we've had over -- almost 3 million lines of code submitted to Alkami since the beginning of this year, and that's customers extending Alkami. So we've taken all of that code, and we've been training an LLM with the code, the instructions, et cetera, and think we'll have the ability to create a prompt-based code creator for an FI. So that would be extremely attractive to an institution. The team that builds onboarding and account opening and building the loan platform and building the account management platform has built out an agent-based banker capability, if you will. So for the banker who's interacting with somebody, how can they rapidly understand everything about that client across all of the systems within the bank. So to answer your question, there are dozens of use case areas where we can bring capabilities to clients that they're excited about, and we're excited about doing it. We've got -- as I said, we've got 2 pilot projects underway that I just described.

Your next question is from Saket Kalia from Barclays.

Congrats on hiring Cassandra and Bryan tip my cap to you on your next phase.

Great. Thanks, Saket.

Absolutely. Alex, maybe for you. It sounded like the selling activity in the quarter was really strong, but maybe some of the implementations are a bit more Q4 weighted than at least we were thinking. And if you look back at the last few years, it's been that third quarter that's been the strongest quarter in terms of adding new users to the platform. So was maybe some of this -- the push from -- or the timing from Q3 to Q4, is this because there's just maybe a couple of few customers? Or is there maybe some shifting seasonality that you're starting to notice in the business?

If I separate it between signing and implementing. If I could talk about those 2 separately, and I'll start with implementing. There is a small amount of seasonality in terms of implementing. So when we are talking to a client about the implementation schedule, when you think about the rhythm of their year, they would prefer to implement sometime in late -- either sometime in late Q1 into early Q2 or after Labor Day and before Thanksgiving. So if you just thought purely of the seasonality of their business, there is some preference that the clients have in terms of the time of year that they want to implement. And if I just look back over the last 4 or 5 years of all the implementations that we've done, it does -- there is a little bit more that happens in Q2 and a little bit more that happens between Labor Day and Thanksgiving. That tends to be what I would say, some type of seasonality. Nothing in terms of online banking happens over the Christmas holiday, right, because that's when everybody has to be able to access our digital banking. And then we really don't experience -- there's not any implied seasonality from a bookings perspective, right? A lot of that just depends upon historically when did the clients' contract end, when do they need to get a contract signed so that they can get the implementation scheduled. So I don't really see a lot of seasonality necessarily in terms of signings, and then there's some customer behavior in terms of the implementations.

Got it. Got it. That's super clear. Bryan, maybe for my follow-up for you, I just want to -- just around the same topic, I just want to make sure I understand how the timing of implementations maybe impacts the revenue guide and understanding it's very small. But it sounds like because these implementations are maybe happening, again, maybe a quarter later than what we were expecting, that's one less quarter of revenue for the full year. But it sounds like from an ARR perspective, we still get the ARR that we were expecting by the end of the year, kind of in line with what we were originally expecting. So we get a quarter less of revenue for the year. But from an ARR perspective, it really shouldn't change that view. Is that the right way to think about it?

That is the right way to think about it, Saket. You can have ebb and flow during the year in terms of implementation dates pushing back, moving forward, and that can impact in-year revenue. But the key takeaway is we're going to have a step up to 23 -- 22%, 23% in live ARR growth as we exit the year, which is in line with our expectations at the beginning of the year. The comment I was making in responding to Andrew was really a year-over-year comparison. And so let's separate that from when you have one quarter of visibility what can happen in a quarter. And when you look at Q3, we had some new client implementations shift out during the quarter, which can have an impact on in-quarter revenue. We had 13 implementations for new clients on online banking in Q3 of this year, which is our highest. We had some resource reallocation that occurred to those new online banking client implementations, and that had some marginal impact on add-on sale implementation. Now the good news is we go into Q4 and we have $67 million of ARR in the backlog. A lot of that is add-on sales and MANTL and much of that backlog associated with those lines of businesses will implement in the fourth quarter, further driving us to hit the step-up in live ARR growth in the quarter. So that's a lot of different moving parts, but I wanted to provide you a perspective that there are several different levers here that we can push, but the end result is where does live ARR end and how does that compare on a year-on-year basis.

Your next question is from Jacob Stephan from Lake Street Capital Markets.

I'll echo the congratulations to Bryan as well. It's been a pleasure working with you. So there's -- you guys made an interesting comment about 900 middle market institutions that are not on a modern platform yet. If I recall, there's -- you guys have always kind of said there's about 2,000. Just curious, maybe you could help us think through the segments of the remaining 900. Are these -- are we through a lot of the low-hanging fruit and people that are ready to switch immediately and maybe now we're starting to work into longer sales cycles? Or maybe just help us think through some of that commentary.

Yes. And let me get -- make sure that we've got the specifics correct. What I said is of the top 2,500 FIs, excluding mega banks and super regionals, there are still over 900 credit unions and nearly 1,000 banks that are not on a modern platform like Alkami, right? And so as we've always said, the -- all these clients are on multiyear contracts. So that means a portion of them come up every year to make a decision. And some of them decide to make a change and some of them decide to stay with their incumbent provider. But the main takeaway for us is we've got -- Bryan, how many live online banking?

291.

Yes. So we've got 291 live online banking customers. And we still have a lot of runway in this market from a digital transformation perspective. And that 2,500 is our target market. So that's the main point I'd like you to take away from it is within our target market, even given the size that Alkami is today at almost $0.5 billion of revenue, we still have quite a bit of market that we can sell into and continue to grow.

Got it. Okay. That's helpful. And then maybe just touching on gross margin here. I think -- in Q2, it looked like we were trending well above kind of the 2026 framework at 65%, but we did see a sequential step down, and you guys are obviously seeing some nice operating leverage. But maybe help us think through some of the gross margin pressures in Q3. Is this strictly MANTL increased cloud costs or just kind of drill down on that.

No, it's really related to some of the third-party IP that we sell through our platform. Some of the excess fees associated with those sets of products were lower than what we had originally anticipated in the quarter, and that had the effect of driving down gross margin. But that's the main impact sequentially. Year-over-year, we still expanded gross margin 100 basis points. And we'll exit the year just under 65% gross margin for the full year, and we feel really good about where we could actually perform from a gross margin perspective in 2026.

And remember, when Bryan and I came out and shared with you all a longer-term view of the business model, it would get to 65% gross margin by the end of 2026. So we feel like we're ahead of what we had planned to do.

Your next question is from Ella Smith from JPMorgan Chase.

So first, I was hoping to ask about the record or near record number of implementations. I'm curious what is enabling you to implement more customers in a given quarter?

Thanks for the question. The services team has continued to rebuild their implementation methodology and the services team and the product and engineering teams have some different ceremonies that they've created that allow them to collaborate on changes that they need to make. Our code is not a code where you do any custom development. You're doing configuration in the code for the client. And so the teams studied their -- the best implementations that they do. They looked at the behavior of the company and the best implementations versus the ones that took longer. And then they just started replicating -- I don't mean to minimize because it was a big piece of work. They started replicating the behaviors of the best implementations. And that included things like how can we help the customers test the code. That included things like taking over on behalf of the customer, all of the third-party relationships that were going to be necessary during implementation. And then a lot of cycle times that have been increased from a speed perspective in terms of the product, the engineering teams and the services teams. So I would just characterize it as just really good old-fashioned work that went into understanding what it takes to make a great implementation and then figuring out how to replicate that. I'm very proud of the company, very proud of the services team to be able to implement 13 clients in a quarter. And we also, last week, had 3 clients go live in the same day. And we've only done that one other time in our company's history. So that team is really performing well.

And this is a scale game. So I mean, you can't perform at this level unless you've scaled your business to a point to where you're over 20 million digital users. So our ability to implement is definitely a differentiator for us in the market. And I'd like to echo Alex's compliments towards this team because if you drill down into the numbers, and Alex mentioned this in his prepared comments, but we also implemented 6 banks during the quarter. We now have 33 banks live. So 20% of the banks that we have live were implemented during the quarter that we had our highest new client implementation quarter. So that says a lot to the progress that this team has made. It also says a lot to the progress that we're making and now how we can go to market and sell to a bank with this level of track record and success in implementing a bank financial institution.

That's very helpful. And if I can throw in a quick follow-up. Can you speak to the factors that led to your backlog ticking up in the quarter? And if you can provide any color on its composition, that would be really helpful.

Well, we have 1.7 million digital users in our backlog now. If you look back a year ago, that number was about 1.2 million. So one of the largest factors is the fact of the number of digital users that we have in backlog. It's almost a year's worth of digital user growth, which provides significant visibility. And then also MANTL, MANTL is contributing in a big way to our implementation backlog. When we acquired MANTL, we suggested that MANTL would reach $60 million of ARR under contract. So that would include the backlog. we're almost at that level as we cross over Q3. So MANTL is doing a very good job in selling their products direct. As we mentioned in our prepared comments, we're doing a great job of cross-selling MANTL into either a new client win or into our installed base. We now have 44 shared clients under contract, which is 29 more than when we acquired MANTL. And then also the attachment rate of Segmint, so our data and marketing analytics product for the year, we're attaching at a rate of 75%. So if you step back from this and you go, well, what's the significance of the company being able to sell these 3 individual platforms into a client. Well, when you add Segmint and MANTL on a new client win or even a sell into our installed base, it increases the ARR 30%. So it's a pretty significant boost in ARR growth and ultimately subscription revenue growth.

Your next question is from Chris Kennedy from William Blair. Looks like that question was disconnected. The next question is from Adam Hotchkiss from Goldman Sachs.

And Bryan, great working with you. Best wishes to you going forward. I wanted to talk about, Bryan, I know we've talked about the high visibility into revenue you have entering any given year. Could you maybe talk a little bit about the pieces outside of that, right? Maybe some of these surprise cross-sells that you get in any given year that would ultimately lead to the outperformance versus the visibility that you have in a given year? How are some of those cross-sells and upsells tracking relative to historical trends?

Our cross-sells actually, as we mentioned on the call, as a percent of our total sales, excluding MANTL to keep the comparison consistent was just under 50% through the first 9 months of this year, which was a step up from last year. So our view is we're ahead of where we would like to be from a cross-sell perspective. Our ultimate goal was to be at 50% in 2026. So of our new client wins, 50% of those banks, 50% are credit unions, but of our total new sales, 50% derived from cross-sell activity. And MANTL is only going to accelerate that.

Okay. That's really useful. And then one of the things that struck me intra-quarter was some of the MANTL announcements like the Taktile partnership and the bulk account opening product. Can you maybe just give us some color around what MANTL provides you from an innovation perspective now that you have them under your roof? Does it allow you to accelerate and pull forward some of these innovation projects that you've been thinking about? Any color around that would be useful.

Yes. Well, the biggest thing that it provides us is the ability to deliver one of the most important business capabilities that a regional and community financial institution wants. Let me go back just a little bit. These institutions are institutions that have great relationships in their community. They want to grow. But as with everything over the last couple of years, the digital experience makes a huge difference in terms of whether or not they're able to grow. The experience that they're able to create today without something like Alkami and MANTL technologies coming together, the experience that they're able to create today for a new customer or member that wants to sign up or a new customer or member that wants to buy a new product is not a very good experience at all. It's a choppy experience that goes between 3 or 4 different systems, sometimes requires a call into a call center, sometimes might even require a piece of paper to be signed. And so their growth strategy depends upon having an integrated front-end experience that is seamless and intuitive. So I would tell you the biggest opportunity that we have, and this is actually the work that is underway right now where we are building the integration between the 3 products between the data and marketing platform, the onboarding and account opening platform and digital banking is that a new customer of an institution or an existing customer of an institution who's buying a new product, that's a completely seamless experience with a great user experience. And that is a business capability that every single one of our customers and prospects absolutely wants. Now beyond that, what's great about the team that we put together with Alkami from MANTL is it is a highly innovative software -- product software team. And so they already have 3 or 4 ideas like how can we build out an account maintenance application. As we talked about earlier, innovating from a loan origination platform perspective. So that team has a very high velocity of new product development and a lot of creative ideas, and we expect them to be adding product to the portfolio that we can monetize. So we remain really excited about the acquisition that we did.

And Adam, think about -- so it's important what Alex just shared as it relates to where we can have innovation. And there's other areas in the company where we can drive innovation. But when you have a financial model that affords the visibility such as Alkami and you're scaling your profitability at a very high rate, it provides you the luxury to pull forward some of those investments and invest in those areas while you're still over delivering on your commitments from a profitability perspective. And I think that's a key differentiator as you think about the investment thesis in Alkami is what fuels the engine in a public company that fuels the engine of innovation, but yet still allows that business to deliver on its profitability goals. That's a balancing equation you have to walk through. But because of the visibility we have into our revenue and profitability, it provides us that luxury.

The next question is from Chris Kennedy from William Blair.

I'll just echo the comments to Bryan and Cassandra. Congratulations. It's good to see the 4 new bank wins in the quarter. Can you just talk about what you're seeing there? And was it related to combining the sales forces of Alkami and MANTL?

Yes. I mean the one -- I would say the main thing that we're seeing -- remember, this is a risk-averse marketplace. They're having to move from a suite to a best-of-breed, and they want to know that a company has got a track record to successfully move them on to a modern digital banking platform. So our success in bringing previous clients onto the platform is creating confidence in the market. The other thing that's happening is we're accelerating building capabilities in our treasury management portfolio. And so we're able to meet with prospects and show them the capability that we have in treasury management, show them the advanced capability that we're building, show them the teams that we have dedicated to building that capability and project the rate and speed that we're going to be adding those capabilities. So if you think about a client, right, they're making a decision today knowing that they're coming on the system in 9 to 12 months. And so they're evaluating, for example, the treasury management capability that we have right now -- they're evaluating the wisdom of our road map. Do we know what we ought to build? They're evaluating our track record for building those features and getting them into production, and they're making a decision on a year from now, is this company going to have, a, the capability to connect me with the core I have to their digital banking system? And is this company going to have the commercial, whether you call it, commercial business banking, treasury management? Are they going to have the capabilities that I need to run my business? And what we're seeing is that all the hard work that we've been doing over the last couple of years is now starting to create traction in the market where people can see that we're bringing customers live and people can see that we're building software. They want a modern platform and they're picking Alkami.

Understood. And it's great. And then as a follow-up, it's great to hear MANTL is nearing $60 million of ARR, about a quarter ahead of expectations. Can you just talk about the loan origination initiative for MANTL and kind of what you see as the opportunity with that?

Well, let me remind everybody what we've talked about in terms of the loan origination platform. As we said, there are a set of lighthouse clients that are collaborating with Alkami and MANTL to build a loan platform, and we're going to be bringing those lighthouse clients on the loan platform. We're going to be evaluating product market fit and our ability to do a great job for those clients. And sometime, towards the end of this year or the beginning of next year based upon our valuation of our ability to go to market with that product, then we'll make a decision to go to market with that product. That is not a generally available product that our sales team can sell right now. So to frame your expectations, it's a market that would like us to be in it. It's a product that we're building, but we're going to make darn sure that it's got great product market fit, and we've got live customers that are satisfied before we put it in the bag of the sales team.

Your next question is from Jeff Van Rhee from Craig-Hallum.

Alex, Bryan, this is Daniel Hibshman on for Jeff Van Rhee. On MANTL, I think what really stuck out to me a lot about some of the numbers you were quoting there, the signings this quarter, if I have it right, 29 new clients for MANTL, 15 of which were new to Alkami. So call it, half of the MANTL signings this quarter were Alkami clients. And I assume cross-sell plays a really big role in that. I mean the MANTL base can't be half Alkami clients. I think you said I would infer the MANTL base is closer to sort of market share division in terms of Alkami. So half of new signings coming on -- coming from the Alkami base, I mean, are we looking at MANTL's new signings almost doubling as a function of being tied up with Alkami? Just your thoughts on the pace and impact that Alkami being part of MANTL is bringing.

I'm going to give you a qualified answer and let Bryan talk to the numbers. What you're seeing from our base is a demand for a great highly intuitive onboarding and account opening product. And so when they see MANTL and what that team has built, they want to buy the product. So it's had great reception in our market. I would never project doubling sales.

Yes. I mean -- and so MANTL joined Alkami. So let me kind of put that out there. I think you said Alkami joining MANTL. But MANTL joined Alkami. And so when we acquired MANTL, we've tried to compare that to our Segmint acquisition, which is our data and marketing analytics products. And what we had at the time of the acquisition as an investment thesis is the fact that the acquirer, the purchaser within an FI of the MANTL solution is generally the same or close to the same and it's closely situated to the individual who buys online banking. So we have a good contact from a cross-sell into our installed base perspective that would allow us to leverage those relationships. Now comparing that to the data and marketing analytics product, we see a very, very high attachment rate on a new logo sale, a new client win when the C-suite is involved in the decision. The challenge that we initially had with that acquisition was it's a different buyer in the financial institution. So the relationships that we had for cross-selling into our installed base weren't necessarily the relationship to champion that purchase decision, that buy decision within the FI. We don't have that challenge with MANTL. So that's what we should point out, and that's why we're seeing very early success and much greater success than what we experienced with the Segmint acquisition in the first 2 to 3 quarters.

That's helpful. And then just on the ARR and backlog for implementation, I believe I heard that was $67 million, just for a fact check if that's correct, $67 million in ARR in backlog for implementation. And then -- if that was $68 million last quarter, I have written down here. So a slight tick down sequentially there. Just given the 10 new signings to the digital banking platform, strong signings for the quarter like you called out, just why would that not tick up? What are the dynamics there?

We had a significant implementation quarter. We had the largest number of online banking new client implementations that we've had in the history of the company. And within that, there were 6 banks, and there was also a very large client that went live as well. So...

Also MANTL had as many implementations in Q3 as in the entire first half.

Yes. MANTL continues to improve their throughput of implementation. So there's other -- so there's -- that's the factor that pulls out of your backlog, and it was just a significant implementation quarter, which what gives us confidence in the step-up in organic growth, both for revenue and ARR as we exit the year.

There are no further questions at this time. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes your conference call for today. We thank you for participating and ask that you please disconnect your lines.