Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Third Quarter Ally Financial Earnings Conference Call. My name is Caroline and I'm your operator for today. At this time, all participants are in listen-only mode. We will conduct a question-and-answer session towards the end of the conference. As a reminder, the call is being recorded for replay purposes. And now, I'd like to turn the call over to Michael Brown, Executive Director of Investor Relations (00:34). Please proceed, sir.

Great. Thanks, operator, and thank you everyone for joining us as we review Ally Financial's third quarter 2015 results. You can find the presentation we'll reference during the call on the Investor Relations section of our web site, ally.com. I'd like to direct your attention to the second slide of today's presentation regarding forward-looking statements and risk factors. The content of our conference call will be governed by this language. This morning, our CEO, Jeff Brown and our CFO, Chris Halmy will cover the third quarter results. We'll also have some time set aside for Q&A at the end. Now, I'd like to turn the call over to Jeff Brown. Jeffrey Brown - Chief Executive Officer & Director: Great. Thanks, Michael (01:19). Good morning, everyone. We appreciate you joining us today. From our perspective, it was another strong quarter of execution and delivering results. I continue to be proud of my teammates that are adapting to changes in the markets, taking advantage of opportunities to be disruptive and capturing quality business flows. Across our businesses, whether that's auto finance, insurance, deposits or corporate finance, we remain focused on taking care of the customer base and that in turn is advancing our company. Before we get into financial results, I want to start by providing update on a few key focus areas that are noted on slide number three. First, let's cover the Auto Finance business. Originations continue to be solid again this quarter at $11.1 billion and we will surpass guidance previously communicated to you. We would now expect to see originations breakthrough $40 billion for the year. Obviously, STAR has been a partial contributor to the strong flow, but we've made nice rebounds in the Chrysler channel. We continue to see healthy flows in the Growth Channel. And despite…

Thanks, JB. Let's turn to slide five. We delivered another quality quarter with core pre-tax income of $431 million, net financing revenue of $981 million was up year-over-year and quarter-over-quarter. Stronger auto originations continue to drive earning asset balances higher. We continue to benefit from strong used car prices and funding costs continue to come down. Other revenue declined to $332 million this quarter, driven primarily by lower investment gains, but was still within our expected range. Provision expense of $211 million was up, driven by our strong auto loan growth. And just to reiterate, provision expense is the direct effect of our loan portfolio growth, as the origination mix shifts to more loan versus lease. And we also have the typical seasonal charge-off increase in 3Q. Total non-interest expense was $672 million, which is broken out between controllable and non-controllable items. The big driver of the decline quarter-over-quarter and year-over-year is the insurance weather-related losses, which show up in the other non-interest expense line. While 3Q is typically seasonally lower than 2Q, we did see a nice benefit on a year-over-year basis. We also continued to make progress on controllable expenses, which were down another $20 million year-over-year. These results drove GAAP net income of $268 million. Remember, for the year-over-year comparison, we had $130 million of discontinued operations income related to our China JV, as well as a one-time tax benefit from the sale of the mortgage servicing operations last year. Looking at key metrics, adjusted EPS for the quarter was $0.51, which was up from 2Q helped by lower preferred dividends, and is generally in line with consensus expectations. Core ROTCE was 9.2% and our adjusted efficiency ratio was 44% in the quarter. Both metrics are consistent with our year-end targets. Slide six reviews the results by…

Thanks, JB. As we move into Q&A, we do ask that you please limit yourself to one question plus a single follow-up. If you have additional follow-up questions, after the Q&A session, the Investor Relations team will be available after the call. So, operator, with that, please start the Q&A.

Okay Thank you. Please standby for your first question, which comes from the line of Moshe Orenbuch from Credit Suisse. Please go ahead. Moshe Ari Orenbuch - Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC (Broker): Thanks. Hey, Chris, I think I heard you say that 76% of the originations were funded in the bank and then just under 10% were non-prime. So, there's still I guess, does that mean that there's another 14% of the originations that could be incrementally funded in the bank even now?

Yes. I think... Moshe Ari Orenbuch - Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC (Broker): And can you talk about the – yes...

Yes. It's actually – we have just shy of 14% in subprime today and about 76%. So, it's – the delta is a little bit different. We have historically had some, what I would call, internal restrictions on what can go to the bank for various reasons. It's something we're actually digging into pretty heavily right now and we expect that percentage to go up as well, as we really normalize the bank-parent construct internally. So, the answer to your question is, yes, we expect that to rise. Moshe Ari Orenbuch - Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC (Broker): All right. So, just a follow-up. And basically, it means that you're going to have a higher percentage of ongoing originations funded at the bank. So, as those – you're going to build those assets – there'll be a better spread on those. And then on top of that, the 76% number could be going up as well?

That's correct – that's correct. So, I would expect – I would expect our order originations, close to 85% of those, to start getting directed to the bank in very short order. And then, obviously, with the funding cost that we have at the bank, that obviously is where we're focused on expanding our profitability going forward. And then on the long-term, there's no reason for us to not move that percentage really into the 90%'s as we look to continually to normalize those regulatory restrictions at the bank. Moshe Ari Orenbuch - Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC (Broker): Okay. Maybe a follow-up on the Chrysler, you've continued to increase your penetration, just talk about the outlook there?

Yes, listen, the Chrysler channel has been great for us. We have great relationships really at the dealership level. We participate both in their retail books as well as their lease books at times. So, our penetration is up on a year-over-year basis. We think it'll be pretty steady and there could be opportunities to go up further. Moshe Ari Orenbuch - Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC (Broker): Great. Thank you. Jeffrey Brown - Chief Executive Officer & Director: And I'd just say, within the Chrysler channel, we're getting the opportunity to really compete heads-up there with other players that are in the space. So, I think we're doing a good job. And in fact, earlier Monday, Tuesday this week, spent time with a number of Chrysler dealers and just continue to feel pretty optimistic about progress in that channel. Moshe Ari Orenbuch - Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC (Broker): Thank you. Jeffrey Brown - Chief Executive Officer & Director: Thanks.

Thanks for that question. Your next question comes from the line from – of Eric Beardsley from Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Are you on mute, Eric? Eric Beardsley - Goldman Sachs & Co.: Sorry, yes. Thank you. Hi. Just on the Series G, is there anything else that you, I guess, need to demonstrate to the Fed, or are you just waiting for them at this point?

I mean, I think, look, we're in a very active dialog with the Fed right now. And as we stated, we will be very direct and straightforward to the market whenever we've got a conclusion. We've been in dialogue for really past few months on it and hey, the fact that we are in dialogue, I think is a positive sign. I still remain optimistic that we're going to be able to do something, but it's a process and hopefully we'll have news to report one way or another in the next 30-plus days. Eric Beardsley - Goldman Sachs & Co.: Got it. Great. And then just on the credit side, I guess given where the mix is, just want to hear your thoughts on where the allowance could go moving forward? In the past, you've talked about stability, are we to expect it to stay in this 125 basis points to 130 basis points range over the next year?

Yes. So I mean, when you think about where our – and I think you're referring really to the retail auto loan book and like I said, I expect the overall charge-offs to be around 1% this year and drifting up. So, if you think about the coverage ratio of 125 basis points to 130 basis points, that should provide us plenty of cushion. So the answer to that is, yes, I expect that coverage rate to be in that area. Eric Beardsley - Goldman Sachs & Co.: Okay. Jeffrey Brown - Chief Executive Officer & Director: And then obviously, Eric, I mean, we're going to follow very closely what's going on in the macro economy, what's going on in unemployment. I mean even this morning, you see claims, initial claims at a 42-year low. So, still positive signs that consumers are pretty healthy right now. We recognize it is still mixed economic data, but there a number of positive signs that lead us to believe credit is going to be in good shape for quite a while. Eric Beardsley - Goldman Sachs & Co.: Great. And then just lastly, in the Growth Channel, are there any OEMs that you could point you where you're doing significantly better than you were before, whether it's at Ford or somewhere else?

I would say, it really is across the board. We've had some success with other U.S. manufacturers, the one you just mentioned, as well as some other Korean nameplates as well. So it is fairly distributed, but it's a nice mix of nameplates. Eric Beardsley - Goldman Sachs & Co.: Okay. Great. Thank you.

Thanks.

Thank you. The next question we have comes from the line of Cheryl Pate from Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead. Cheryl M. Pate - Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC: Hi. Good morning. I just wanted to touch upon, obviously, you've been very successful in growing the market share in the non-subvented channels over the last couple of quarters. We have heard from a couple of other auto finance companies that the competitive environment seems to maybe be getting a little bit more heated again. And so, I just wanted to get your thoughts on what you're seeing in terms of pricing and terms and maybe some color you can share around recent originations?

Yes. I mean, the one stat I would like to look at is – look at the quarterly yields that we're originating versus the expected annualized charge-offs for those loans. And for the last couple of quarters, as we kind of changed the origination shift, the yields have been in the 5.5% area and the losses have been just a tick over 1%, 1.05% to 1.00% to 1.10% in annualized losses. So, we're not necessarily seeing the competitive environment really affect the auto yields in any major way. Where we're seeing the competition honestly has been on the dealer floorplan book and as we've been pretty transparent, we've taken a lot of our dealer floorplans off of prime rate floors, most of them to a 30-day LIBOR to really help compete. Now, that has obviously compressed some of our asset yields overall the last year, but obviously sets us up well for a rising rate environment. Cheryl M. Pate - Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC: Okay. That's really helpful. And then as a follow-up, just wanted to touch – obviously, as you move more and more through the Bank in terms of fundings and have been successful growing the deposit platform, how do you think ultimately of the mix of funding and sort of where ABS fits in there as you continue to grow deposits?

Yes, it's so – Cheryl, it's so nice having a Bank in a growing deposit base. I mean, we've seen the ABS market be very choppy over the last three months. The credit spreads, the availability of credit have really been difficult in this market and to be able to have a deposit base that right now that funds almost 50% of our assets is phenomenal. It gives us the ability to back off the ABS markets when conditions aren't great. And really for the first time in a while, you're seeing ABS funding being much more expensive than deposit funding. That wasn't true a year or two ago. So, you're seeing that dynamic really change. So, when you think about us adding $6 billion to $7 billion of deposits a year going forward, that 50% is going to continue to rise every quarter. And I'd like to see it in the 60% to 70% range. So, we feel pretty optimistic about having that growing deposit base and really providing stability of funding going forward. Cheryl M. Pate - Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC: Okay, great. Thanks very much.

Thanks, Cheryl.

Thank you. The next question we have comes from the line of Sanjay Sakhrani from KBW. Please go ahead. Steven Kwok - Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc.: Great. Thanks. This is actually Steven Kwok filling in for Sanjay. Thanks for taking my questions. The first one I guess is, you've been making great progress around the efficiency ratio. How should we think about it over the longer-term? Could you give us some guidance around how low it could perhaps go over like next couple of years or so?

Yes. We're pretty comfortable today in the guidance we've put out to have that mid-40s level efficiency ratio. What we're balancing now really is getting more efficient in the current operations of the company, but being able to redeploy a lot of those savings into future investment, whether it's on the technology side or on product innovation side, to make sure that we continue to build for the long-term future. So, my guidance to you over the next year or so would be to look at the efficiency ratio in a very consistent range. Steven Kwok - Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc.: Got it. And how much of the controllable expenses do you have left that you can still perhaps cut out the business? Jeffrey Brown - Chief Executive Officer & Director: I think you're going to see – in the fourth quarter, you're going to see continued year-over-year decrease in controllable expenses. Okay. So, I think you'll see more efficiency there. But, like I say, as we get into 2016 and we start launching some new products and initiatives, I don't necessarily expect incremental year-over-year savings as long as we really remain around that mid-40s efficiency ratio. Steven Kwok - Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc.: Got it. And then, just in terms of when we looked at the average gain per vehicle, that has been holding up fairly well. Can you provide some outlook on around that lines item going forward?

Yes. Used car prices obviously continue to hold up very well. Our lease dispositions, obviously, are experiencing pretty good gains. We're seeing it a little lower on a year-over-year basis. We try to change depreciation and obviously look at it on a total lease revenue basis going forward. But, the one guidance I will give you is we're seeing pretty good October flows again. We normally see a pretty big drop-off from 3Q to 4Q. It's a seasonality thing. We have less cars coming off of lease in the fourth quarter and as well because of the winter months, you just have lower used car prices. So, I expect that dynamic to happen again, but maybe as drastic as it happened last year. Steven Kwok - Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc.: Great, thanks for taking my questions.

Thanks, Steve. Jeffrey Brown - Chief Executive Officer & Director: Thanks.

Thank you. The next question we have comes from the line of Rick Shane from JPMorgan. Please go ahead.

Hi, guys. Thanks for taking my question this morning. When I'm looking at slide 13, which shows the origination mix, it really shows that you've been able to through the new standard business offset the rundown in GM Subvented business. One of the things that occurs to me and you've showed some additional slides showing standard GM business, how much is the Ally Dealer Rewards program driving that shift? Are you finding the dealers who were doing two or three subvented deals a month, historically, are now just doing an incremental two or three standard deals in order to hit their tiering? Jeffrey Brown - Chief Executive Officer & Director: Yes, Rick, it's JB. Thanks for the question. So, you're exactly right. I mean and I think this ties back to the strengths of the overall relationships out there and as you can see, the GM flows are pretty constant now. We would expect that to continue. So, the one thing I'd say about ADR is, don't view it as a static program. We constantly – it's part of the reason why we're in front of dealers every single day. And we understand their business, we understand flows that can no longer be directed to us because of manufacturer changes. So, we work with the dealers on finding customized approaches to enable them to continue to get ADR. So, it is a very powerful weapon for us. It is very hard to break. And I think we've seen the exact behavior we want out of dealers and they want out of us. We've responded to changes in the market, they've redirected flows to us, and it's part of the reason why you're seeing the GM channel holding up so well.

Got it. And curious, you described it as a dynamic program and that makes sense. Have you seen a meaningful change in the number of dealers that are in your highest tier or have you been able to maintain that as a pretty static measure? Jeffrey Brown - Chief Executive Officer & Director: I mean Champions Club kind of a highest overall level; we've lost very few. I think the trends have been very static there. I think even year-over-year, I think I would call it under two hands of lost dealers. So I mean you're kind of – you're down I think about 10, 12 dealers year-over-year.

Got it. Okay. That's very helpful. Thank you, guys. Jeffrey Brown - Chief Executive Officer & Director: You got it.

Thank you. The next question we have comes from the line of David Ho from Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Good morning. Going a little further on Rick's question, it seems like GM Financial continues to be wanting to increase the floorplan penetration and almost double it in the next two or three years. How do you expect that to impact those dealer losses going forward and your ability to go after core business? Obviously, it's now a subvention relationship there, but is it more difficult for them to capture share in that realm?

Well, one of the difficulties they will have, okay, is we talked about the relationships and the great relationships we have, and that's without being said. But, when you think about the cost of funds as well, all of our dealer floorplan book is sitting in our bank, okay? We have a deposit base at 115 basis points that funds a dealer floorplan book. So from a pricing perspective, we really have that type of power to be able to compete. So, and when you think of finance companies that compete in the dealer floorplan space, they have to go to the securitization markets and the securitization markets are more expensive. So, in order for them to conquest dealers away from Ally on price, they're accepting lower profitability. They may choose to do that, but if that's the case, a dealer would be – from a price perspective, we have better pricing power than a finance company. But having said that, we have lost GM dealers and we may continue to lose GM dealers, but as we do that, just like on the retail side, we continue to diversify that book. So, we are going out and conquesting other OEM dealer floorplans as well. So, as we see the shift happening, the shift happens in dealer floorplan a lot slower than it happens on the retail side, but we're not overly concerned about losing overall balances in that over time.

Okay. That's helpful. And I know it's still early days on the retail bank expansion but can you remind us, is the strategy to go after more fee-based products, loan-based products? You mentioned the digital strategy, is this possible to go – do a partnership strategy with some of the other online lending platforms that are out there – and maybe if you can shed some light on that? Jeffrey Brown - Chief Executive Officer & Director: Yes. David, it's JB. I'd just say, all of the above. We've got a number of explorations underway right now and I think you'll start to see some of these things manifest itself early in the first quarter of next year. And so, think about that more traditional banking products that you could think, household bank may want to offer, all the way to how do we tend to transact today through our mobile device more direct offerings, things like that. So, we're out exploring both all-out builds from the Ally umbrella, as well as partnership opportunities. And again, we'll get a little bit more specific on that in the first quarter of next year.

Okay. And just a quick follow-up on that. Would that impact your capital plans as it relates to the CCAR process and using the balance sheet, et cetera, or it's just not meaningful enough?

I don't think it will be initially meaningful. But, keep in mind, we'll always evaluate the growth of the balance sheet and the profitability that brings versus returning capital, whether it's through share buybacks or dividend. So what I would say, it's an ongoing analysis that we do, but I would not expect 2.0 to have a significant effect from a capital perspective in our upcoming CCAR.

Great. Thanks a lot. Jeffrey Brown - Chief Executive Officer & Director: Thanks, David.

Thank you. The next question we have comes from the line of Chris Donat from Sandler O'Neill & Partners. Please go ahead. Christopher R. Donat - Sandler O'Neill & Partners LP: Thanks for taking my questions. Just maybe to connect a couple of questions have been asked, but as you think about these new products and mobile offerings and partnerships, you did say, Chris, that the expense ratio is going to be similar. So it's not like we – I assume we've already been investing in a lot of things – we're not going to see any sort of step up in expenses, is that right?

Yes. I mean, let me give you a perfect example. We have been working on a new auto loan backbone system for the last year or so. And it's a multi-year process to really get us the technology that will really bring us, in what I would say, into kind of the next generation of direct-to-consumer lending, and it's something that we've been working on for a while. It's a part of our expenses today and it will continue to be a part of our expenses from a run-rate perspective. So, we've tried to be very focused on finding expense savings and being able to redeploy those expense savings into investments, and I think that will continue. So, as I sit here today, my guidance is, we're going to stick around that mid-40%'s efficiency ratio, which honestly has been about a $300 million savings over the last two years. So, it's been a pretty significant decrease. So I wouldn't expect that type of magnitude going forward from any kind of reduction of expenses, but I also don't expect some meaningful increase at this point. Christopher R. Donat - Sandler O'Neill & Partners LP: Okay. And then just on a different topic, but as we think about how used car prices have performed in the last year and some of the benefit from low gas prices, any sort of general expectations you have for used car price trends in the coming year? I remember JB saying that several months ago that probably down 5% to 10% was sort of conventional wisdom, but just wondering what your thoughts are there?

I think it's still conventional wisdom. We still think it will be down 5% to 10%. One of the benefits obviously on the demand side has been the unemployment rate and the nonfarm payrolls number that JB just mentioned. So, we're seeing more people get jobs, therefore, a lot of them need used cars and you're seeing pretty good demand. So, you have to expect that unemployment at some point will start leveling off. The supply will start picking up due to the lease activity in the market over the last couple of years. So, we are still continuing to predict the 5% decrease over one year and a 10% decrease over two years. Christopher R. Donat - Sandler O'Neill & Partners LP: Got it.

I would model. Christopher R. Donat - Sandler O'Neill & Partners LP: Thank you. Jeffrey Brown - Chief Executive Officer & Director: Thanks, Chris.

Thank you. The next question comes from the line of John Hecht from Jefferies. Please go ahead.

Thanks for taking my questions. Just thinking about the margin and where it might be going in the near-term. First of all on the yield side, what were the yields on new loans maybe versus retiring loans in the quarter? And then second, can you quantify to us just in terms of where you're putting on new deposits and maybe near-term capital actions like the potential retiring of the remainder Series G? What kind of cost of funds you might expect to see – what type of, I guess, contraction cost of funds you might expect to see? Jeffrey Brown - Chief Executive Officer & Director: Yes. So on the consumer auto loan front, we're putting loans on around 5.5%. I would say that we all are having some runoff and amortization of some old loans that were in that area as well. But – so, it's hard to look at on a quarter-over-quarter basis. It doesn't really move the needle that much. But, I do think over time, you're going to see that that's 5.25%, which is somewhere – that's where our yields are today on a consumer auto loan. You're going to see that drift up as we put on onboard these higher yielding loan. So, I do expect that to increase over the next year or so, with rates being steady. So, on the Series G front, to the extent that we get the opportunity to take Series G out in the near-term, we will have to replace some of that with unsecured debt. You have to kind of look at where our unsecured debt profile is today and call it somewhere around 4.5% for a five-year or something in that type of area. So, the replacement of a 7% after-tax dividend with 4.5% of debt is obviously pretty meaningful savings. The other thing I would point out is, we started seeing real good momentum out of the rating agencies, and we've got an upgrades by a couple of rating agencies really over the last few weeks. And now, we're really on the cusp of investment grade. So, to the extent that we get to that next level and something we are focused on, that should also decrease our cost of funds going forward when we go to the debt markets.

That's great color. Thanks very much. And then just – I apologize if you addressed this, but you talk about potential dividends and your focus on getting dividends and repurchases in place in the intermediate future. Just, do you have a sense of what your total payout might be or your capital returns might be as a percentage of income, or what you might ask for? Is there any way we can kind of quantify how things might shake out in the next year or so? Jeffrey Brown - Chief Executive Officer & Director: Yes, it's a little early, okay? So we're – and I've gotten this question a few times. And what I try to point people to or guide people to is, if you look at the average payout of a regional bank today in the CCAR process, it's around 75% of their earnings. So, that would be the average. So, when I think about the starting point, that's where I start. But keep in mind, we also – and we highlighted this a bit in the deck – we have an amortizing DTA, okay, and that amortizing DTA will also create regulatory capital that could give us some potential more room. And I think the other thing – the other guidance I would give you is, any dividend will be a modest dividend to start with. So, we'll have a modest dividend and we'll look to grow that dividend over time. But, I would point you to say that it's going to be modest and the share buybacks will be much heavier in that percentage, especially given where the stock trades today under book value. It would really be the best return for shareholders.

Wonderful. Thanks very much.

Thank you, ladies and gentlemen. That's the end of the question-and-answer session. I would now like to turn the call over to Michael (51:11) for closing remarks.

Great. Thank you very much. If you have additional questions, please feel free to reach out to Investor Relations. Thanks for joining us this morning. Thank you, operator.

Thank you, Michael (51:24). Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for your participation in today's conference. That concludes the presentation. You may now disconnect. Have a good day.