Sure. When I think about interest rates, I go right down kind of the list here from short term liquidity to the back end of the capital structure, short term liquidity with our floor plan lines, which are usually tied to some index rate used to be LIBOR now SOFOR, 0:25:46.3 where we're paying a spread over an index rate, typically, as we've discussed before, those floorplan lines are subsidized by OEMs, and given the amount of for some period of time, and given the amount of churns that we're experiencing in our inventory, and that's on the floor plan lines, there's really not a lot of risk in increasing interest rates, relative to the floor plan that would manifest itself into being materially impactful to the P&L. The -- and I'll kind of go backwards a little bit here, the bond, obviously fixed the back end of the capital structure. And we're at five and five eighths on that bond that we launched, just over a year ago today. And so we feel good that bond, that interest rate is locked in here for the next four years, which leaves kind of the middle piece, which is the draw on the ABL loan, where we were drawn, I think, $110 million or $120 million here at quarter end, it vary again, we're kind of low in terms of our utilization and our leverage profile relative to generating going up the grid pricing wise. So that $110million, $120 million is really all that's floating. At the moment, we are constantly kind of thinking about what to do with that piece, and whether to hedge a little bit, but again, I think we're talking about any material impact, holistically, we think that our business model suggests that we can pass some of this this along. Whether inflation, higher interest rates, so on and so forth, that we can pass some of these higher costs along to customers in the form of just increased pricing. So it's how we think about it.