Welcome to the First Quarter 2023 Earnings Call for Alvotech. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speaker's presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to introduce and hand over the call to Benedikt Stefansson, Director of Investor Relations and Global Communications at Alvotech. Please proceed.

Thank you and good morning or afternoon to everyone joining us on this call today. The company has issued a press release that can be found on our website www.alvotech.com. The release reports financial results for the first quarter of 2023 and provides a business update. Additionally, presentation slides that cover our call today have been posted on our investor website. You'll find all materials posted for the Q1 2023 earnings call under News & Events in the Events & Presentations section on investors.alvotech.com. Our presentation materials and some of our statements that we make today may include forward-looking statements. These statements do not ensure future performance and are subject to risks and uncertainties that are outlined in company filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These risks and uncertainties could cause actual results to differ materially from forward-looking statements that are made. And with me on today's call are Robert Wessman, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Alvotech; Anil Okay, Chief Commercial Officer; Joel Morales, Chief Financial Officer; and Ming Li, Chief Strategy Officer. And with that, I would like to turn the call over to Robert Wessman.

Thank you, Benedikt, and greetings to everyone joining us on the call today. 2023 marks an important year for Alvotech as we celebrate the company's 10 years anniversary. A significant amount of investment over the last decade has allowed us to build the company that includes a vertically integrated biosimilar platform, a vast commercial network and a portfolio of attractive biosimilars and biosimilar candidates that is targeted for global markets. The company is committed to the promise of biosimilars which we believe will provide a long-term benefit to health care systems and patients globally by providing low-cost access to important biologic medicines. In addition to celebrating our 10 years as a company, we are also approaching our first year anniversary as a publicly listed entity. We are listed on NASDAQ in both the US and in our domestic market of Iceland. And since that time, and as laid out on page four of our presentation, we have continued to drive towards our goal to advance the cause of global biosimilars, by progressing a global portfolio of biosimilar candidates through the development process, expanding our commercial footprint and partnerships and by driving a number of corporate initiatives that have allowed us to continue to invest in the platform and the pipeline. Alvotech stands as one of the few large pure-play biosimilar companies. Before we discuss the status of AVT02, our proposed high-concentration and the interchangeable biosimilar to Humira sold in the US market, I'd like to briefly touch upon sustainability of Alvotech. Our ESG program, which is led by our Board, is a crucial component of our company. We firmly believe that biosimilars are an essential element of global health care sustainability. Biosimilars, not only widen access to biologic medicines, but also stimulate innovation in the life science sector by introducing…

Thank you, Robert. I will start by providing a broader update on our disclosed pipeline. Of course, as a company that develops products from scratch, we do maintain an active list of early development targets within R&D. And we do expect to add more products over time as our disclosed pipeline continues to progress. Firstly, we are pleased to announce that we have initiated patient studies for AVT05, a biosimilar candidate to Simponi and Simponi Aria. AVT05 was developed using a murine cell line and utilizes a perfusion production process. This is similar to AVT04, our proposed biosimilar to Stelara. On AVT05, we are currently aware of only one other company that has a clinical-stage asset for a biosimilar to Simponi, and we are the only company with a clinical-stage asset for golimumab that has launched biosimilars in multiple global markets. Worldwide revenues of Simponi and Simponi Aria exceeded US$2 billion in 2022. Initiation of patient studies for AVT05 represents the fifth product to reach this stage in our portfolio, which demonstrates the development capabilities of our biosimilar platform. Included in this group of products is, of course, AVT02, which has begun commercialization in a number of markets, including Canada and Europe, and AVT04, a biosimilar candidate to Stelara, which is filed in major markets globally, including Japan, US, Europe, and Canada. On this call, we would also like to provide updates and unveil two previously undisclosed pipeline opportunities. The first of which is AVT16, a biosimilar candidate to Entyvio, which is a leading immunology product with over US$5 billion in global sales in 2022 and has shown significant growth since the product's launch. Current analyst estimates view the growth potential for the brand to exceed US$8 billion. We have developed our biosimilar to the stage of at-scale manufacturing and…

Thanks, Anil. I'll now provide some brief financial highlights for the period ending March 31st, 2023. In our previous earnings call in March, we reported that during the first quarter, we had closed on a private placement with Icelandic investors of approximately $137 million in gross proceeds. In addition, during the quarter, we collected the remaining proceeds of approximately $14 million from our convertible bond issuance, which we initiated last December. With this financing activity now completed, we ended the first quarter with approximately $116 million cash on hand as of March 31st, excluding restricted cash of $25 million. In terms of our operating performance, the company recorded $16 million in total revenue for the first quarter of 2023 versus $1 million during the same period in the prior year. This sharp increase is driven by our first launch in the prior year, which meaningfully commenced in the second quarter of 2022. There were no milestone revenues recognized in the period given the timing of our performance-based licensing and R&D milestones. We expect to recognize most of our milestone and licensing revenue in the second half of 2023. A point worthwhile noting is that cost of product revenue for the quarter is disproportionate relative to product revenue due to the timing of new launches and elevated production-related charges resulting in higher costs than revenues recognized for the period. We do expect this to normalize as we increase scale of manufacturing and expand our launches. We anticipate that this increase in volumes will have a favorable impact on cost of product revenues, particularly as we increase absorption of our fixed costs. As a reminder, at this juncture, we are planning to wait to provide our 2023 financial guidance until after we have further clarity from the FDA on the potential approval…

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] We will take our first question and the question comes from the line of Andrew Baum from Citigroup. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Thank you. A couple of questions. First, in light of the FDA's inspection and the measures you've put in place to address their concerns. I'm assuming Stelara is manufactured at the same site. Is there any need to amend your filing or put in place additional remediation measures to ensure the US approval? And then, second, I'd be curious if you have any thoughts on the impact for your future development given the denial of Teva's addition to the Supreme Court in relation to Coreg versus Avandia. It would seem that skinny labels are going to be somewhat more problematic in future and I can [Technical Difficulty] cases with your existing portfolios that may make prosecution of these in US [Technical Difficulty]. Thank you.

Thank you, Andrew. Robert Wessman here. We have a BsUFA date in 11th of October for our AVT04. And we have, as we said, we -- even though it's produced at the same manufacturing facility, we still believe we have a pretty good and sufficient time to resolve that. Coming to AVT02, there is not a clarity yet and that has been confirmed by FDA, but they have not taken a decision whether a reinspection is needed or not. And that's why, as I said in my intro, we are seeking a meeting for -- with OPMA, which basically is by a recommendation from FDA to seek a clarity if they have finalized to review our responses, if they are adequate and if inspection or reinspection is needed or not, in which kind of a format that would be. The second question to Anil.

Andrew, I can take the second question. We are aware of the Supreme Court decision. We would not believe that this impacts neither our portfolio or launch decisions in the US market.

Thank you. We will take our next question. Your next question comes from the line of Thibault Boutherin from Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Yes, thank you for taking my question. A couple on Humira biosimilar. First, do you have any -- can you give any indication on your expected timing for the meeting with the FDA? And second question, just to clarify, if you have to actually resubmit BLA after the 28th of June, will it necessarily be resubmission of the original BLA or could you potentially, at that time, already resubmit a BLA with interchangeability?

Robert Wessman here. So basically, we would assume, as we have done in the past, that we will resubmit our biosimilar BLA. We will do that once we have completed the commitments towards FDA, which towards the manufacturing and supply deficiencies, and we assume to close them all, 1st of June. We will then resubmit and we would then go for a six-month clock, which most likely would then give us or would give a BsUFA date six months later. And within that time frame, of course, FDA would then decide if a reinspection is needed or not if that is not already clear at that time. So that's the framework. And the second part of the question?

Well, the first part of the question, I think, was -- Thibault was about the potential meeting timing. I think unlike a Type 1, there's no defined process, but we are engaging and already working on scheduling process for that. So we don't have a defined date, but we believe it will be 30 days or less. That's our assumption.

Thank you.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] We will take our next question, and the question comes from the line of Ashish Verma from UBS. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Hi. Good morning. Thank you for taking my question. I have a few. So first one, just on biosimilar Humira. I wanted to understand a little bit like what is the nature of observations that you received from the FDA this time? Are the previous observations I think you mentioned in previous conversation that there were no repeat observations. So are the previous observations completely resolved? Second one, on Stelara, do you have freedom to operate in this market or does it still need to go through litigation with J&J? I'm just curious, I think from the perspective of interchangeability, do you think this matters for Stelara, and your reason for not pursuing it at this stage. And then finally, a third one that I had was on Keytruda biosimilar. This can be a huge market. I think what I wanted to understand was that is there anything unique or fundamentally unique to the PD-1 design of the palindrome molecule that may not lend itself well to a biosimilar market? Like we have seen competing PD-1 Opdivo not able to show the same level of clinical results as Keytruda. So is there something unique about Keytruda that a biosimilar studies might not be able to replicate the same level of clinical efficacy? Thanks.

Hi, Ashish. This is Ming. Thank you for the question. Maybe I'll answer in a different order and I'll pass it over to Anil. From the previous inspection, which, of course, was in March of '22, there were no repeat observations. I think that's an important -- good question and an important thing to note. So the observations that were provided in the '23 -- March '23 inspection, you asked about the nature of them. I would say that most of them were around the quality system and the quality units. The nature of the observations I would describe as more pointing to upstream, call them upstream observations rather than downstream problems. I think that 483 is public. We have -- but the responses to those are not public. And the way we approach them was to try to address those specifically, but also do it at a macro level and changes in our overall organization and things of that nature as well as where applicable, to do retrospective analysis to ensure that these downstream problems didn't exist historically. As you know, we currently manufacture commercially, of course, not for the US, but for other places. So there's a history there. On the 04 questions, let me pass that to Anil.

Thanks, Ming. Hi, Ashish. Good to hear from you. When it comes to AVT04 question, of course, we cannot comment on that. We cannot give guidance on that. So I will pass that question. But when it comes to interchangeability, we have not made a final decision on pursuing interchangeability for AVT04 as of yet. The reason of that is actually related with the product profile. The product does not have the same regional profile as Humira, and it is those infrequencies compared to Humira and the level of competition in comparison is much more low. Because of those reasons, we have not initiated yet, but we have also still potentially can consider if we want. On your third question regarding Keytruda and let me start with the efficacy part. Of course, this is no different than ustekinumab or trastuzumab biosimilars, which has seen over 70% penetration across the world. So we expect the same with the Keytruda biosimilars. When it comes to efficacy, these are -- biosimilars are efficacious products. So that's point one. When it comes to study design, we are working with authorities globally, both in the US, Europe, Japan, the global authorities in the design phase of our studies. Of course, we get there, advise them, and consult with them and jointly design our clinical product. Thank you.

Thank you. We will take our next question. Your next question comes from the line of Carl Byrnes from Northland Capital Markets. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Thanks for the question and apologies if I missed this. But if the FDA does not require reinspection of the facility, when would be the earliest that you'd be made aware of that? And conversely, if they do require reinspection, when would be the earliest that you'd be made aware of that? Thanks so much.

Yes, thank you for that question. Robert Wessman, here. So we are working, of course, with the FDA. They have said that they are not going to take any earlier action, which means that 28 is the date, which we would either understand that we got approval, potentially would be the day we understand then that reinspection is needed. But we would then still want to highlight that we are still hopeful with the meeting with OPMA, which we are scheduling, as Ming mentioned earlier, and we are in interaction with the FDA on specific questions we have. And we hope to get the clarity out of that meeting, if you will. So I would say, in the worst case, we would learn this 28, but of course, we are still hopeful that we can understand this sooner than that.

Great. Thanks so much.

Thank you. There seems to be no further questions. So I would like to hand back to Robert Wessman for closing remarks.

Actually, Benedikt Stefansson here. Thank you, Heidi. On behalf of the Alvotech team, I would like to thank everybody who participated today, and we wish you a good rest of the day and look forward to speaking to you all again. Thanks.

This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.