Good day, everyone, and welcome to the American Woodmark Corporation Fourth Quarter 2015 Conference Call. Today's call is being recorded, June 2, 2015. We will begin the call by reading the company's Safe Harbor statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All forward-looking statements made by the company involve material risks and uncertainties and are subject to change based on factors that may be beyond the company's control. Accordingly, the company's future performance and financial results may differ materially from those expressed or implied in any such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to, those described in the company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Annual Report to shareholders. The company does not undertake to publicly update or revise its forward-looking statements even if experience or future changes make it clear that any projected results expressed or implied therein will not be realized. For opening remarks and introduction, I'll now turn the conference over to Glenn Eanes, Vice President and Treasurer. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you. Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to this American Woodmark conference call to review our fourth quarter and full year financial results for our fiscal quarter and year ending April 30, 2015. Thank you for taking time to participate. Participating on the call today from American Woodmark will be Kent Guichard, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; Cary Dunston, President and Chief Operating Officer; and Scott Culbreth, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Scott will begin with a review of the quarter and year and an outlook on the future. After Scott's comments, Kent, Cary, and Scott will be happy to answer your questions. Scott?

Thank you, Glenn. Good morning, everyone. Today, we released the results of our fourth fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2015. Financial headlines for the quarter. Net sales were $207 million, representing an increase of 10% over the same period last year. Reported net income was $11.3 million or $0.69 per diluted share in the current fiscal year versus $5.6 million or $0.36 per diluted share last year. Excluding after tax restructuring charges, the company generated $11.2 million or $0.68 per diluted share of net income for the fourth quarter in the current fiscal year compared with $5.4 million or $0.34 per diluted share for the same period of the prior fiscal year. For the quarter, the company generated $22.8 million in cash from operating activities compared to $17 million for last year. For the 12 months ended April, year-to-date net sales were $825.5 million, representing an increase of 14% over the same period last year. Net income was $35.5 million or $2.21 per diluted share in the current fiscal year versus $20.5 million or $1.31 per diluted share last year. Excluding after tax restructuring charges and the one-time benefit of Research and Experimentation Credit, net income was $34.2 million or $2.10 per diluted share, an improvement of 63%. For the current fiscal year, the company generated $58.8 million in cash from operating activities compared to $40.5 million for last year. Some additional comments on sales performance starting with the new construction market. Recognizing a 60 day to 90 day lag between start and cabin installation, the overall market activity in single-family homes was up over 10% for the financial fourth quarter. Single-family starts during December, January and February of the prior period averaged 611,000. Starts over that same time period from the current year averaged 676,000. Our new construction base…

Thank you, sir. [Operator Instructions] And we will take our first question today from Josh Chan with Robert W Baird.

Good morning guys, congrats on a great quarter.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Yeah. I wanted to ask about the repair remodel market and what's your expectation about market growth as you think about next year and if you can talk about also kind of the promotional dynamics that you expect to go on and how that might be different or the same as what you saw this year?

Hi, good morning, Josh. It’s Cary. As I always say forecasting has been pretty tough for us. If we look at home center, I think as Scott mentioned, it is pretty dependent upon that middle-income consumer coming back into the market and being able to go out on a discretionary side and start spending some of the bigger ticket items such as cabinets. We are forecasting the lower single digit this year as well for the home center market. It’s all pretty tied to that middle-income where it’s a first time homebuyer going out or that consumer getting back into market, they are all fairly related. But right now, I would be looking at quite low single digits.

Okay. Any changes on…

[indiscernible]

Yes, the promotional dynamics, any changes there?

It’s always hard to judge as well. Obviously where we respond to market and respond to competitors. Right now, our trends will be based on historical norms. If you look at prior history, we expect to be pretty consistent with where we’ve been in prior years. I would say if normalized level, so nothing on the horizons right now that would expect us to have anything outside the norms for promotional activity in any of our fronts.

Right, that’s good to hear. And Scott, on your comment about the gross margin increase, even with the planned capacity coming on in the second half of the year, do you still expect to achieve 25% incremental gross margin this year or could that be more difficult because of the added capacity?

Yes. So our stated goal is to be in that 25% range as we go forward. We’ll have some impacts in Q3 and Q4 as we bring in the expansion on. We should get relatively close to that 25% goal for the year but it will be sporadic when you look at first half versus second half.

Okay. And then last question, you mentioned some SG&A program cost and training expenses, were those related to the dealer initiative and how should we think about SG&A leverage as we look into next year?

No, those costs were not specific to the dealer channel. Those were across the product portfolio. So we had some product launches that came out, so we had literature and sample cost associated with that. There was a specific training event with designers that was more on the home center side as oppose to the dealer side. As far as future progression around SG&A, we don’t give specific guidance there but we don’t expect to see any tremendous change up or down versus what our run rate was in fiscal year 2015.

Okay, great. Thanks so much and congrats on the quarter.

Thank you.

Thanks, Josh.

We’ll take our next question from Nick Coppola with Thompson Research Group.

Hi, good morning.

Good morning.

I just wanted to follow-up on the incremental gross margin [indiscernible]. Is the right way to think about easy comps in the first half then it kind of moderate in the back half and then you’ve got the plant expansion as well. How should we think about incremental gross margin for the year?

Yes, I think that’s the appropriate way to view it.

Okay. Is there any kind of pricing impact?

We typically don’t give any specific guidance around pricing actions. We’ve said in the past couple of quarters that pricing typically it trails inflationary increases up to six months. Fortunately for the last couple of quarters, we’ve talked about the pace of inflation slowing. So that’s not created a lot of pressure on the pricing front at this stage. We will note that we have seen as of late some signals that perhaps hardware pricing may start to tick up a bit, but we’ve not experienced any of that in our actual purchases as of yet. Back to your original question, I would hate the word easier comps but our problem is it should be a bit stronger in the first half is how I would state it. And then in the second half, we would continue on that trajectory but didn’t have the headwinds of the expansion certainly for a quarter or two.

Okay. And then is there any colors you’d like to add about the management transition and any kind of change we would expect to see it kind of in terms of strategy or anything like that.

I’m sorry, you broke up there. What was the last part, expect to see what?

Any change in strategy or anything like that?

No. I mean we are fortunate we just celebrated our 35th anniversary and as you know you’ve followed us, we do have a lot of consistency and continuity in our leadership. And we just got to the point, we felt that it was time to again make one of those orderly transitions, we do internal promotions, Cary has been around the business for nine years, done a lot of great work. So it was just kind of time in our history and again because Cary has been part of the organization for going on 10 years, and part of the strategy and development he can speak to it as well, but I wouldn't expect us to see any change or significant changes in terms of our longer-term strategy.

No, I mean it’s really driven by our 2019 vision, which we've been pretty communicative on and it is challenging us to think differently about the business and look at strategy different, but it’s not necessarily tied to change in leadership, it’s just a change in the required strategy of the business.

Okay. Thanks for taking my question.

We’ll take our next question from Garik Shmois with Longbow Research.

Hi guys this is actually Mark Zikeli on for Garik today. Just on the quarter, new construction, obviously very strong up 15%, wonder if you can speak to the regional variance, if there was any and if you could talk about what you're seeing in your Texas exposure, that would be helpful.

Yeah, we get that question specific to Texas last quarter and we've not seen any significant changes in our business there at this point in time, as it relates to oil pricing or any significant slowdown, we still saw nice growth in the quarter. From a regional play standpoint, I’d say for us we were a little bit weaker from a year-over-year comp standpoint in the Southeast region and in California, but then pretty good growth rates in the rest of the country.

Yes, we are seeing some recovery, I will say it was a hard winter. So as you start to pull out of that one, you have to start to differentiate any type of lag impact from some built-up demand from the winter versus new stuff and we are watching pretty closely. But as Scott said, Houston - somewhat surprisingly we really haven't seen any negative impact, we are keeping a close eye on it, even with all the storms down there and now we’re keeping a close eye on it, but nothing substantial yet.

Okay. And then going back to the dealer channel a little bit, I guess if you could speak to some of the consolidation in the industry obviously with Fortune Brands and Norcraft recently, just wondering how you guys think that affects you?

That's a strategic plan in their part, we - there is always pluses and minuses that come with any change, but to us it is just change. We are positioned very well and we how we differentiate ourselves based on service and we do not expect it to limit our growth, in fact we are obviously going out looking for additional opportunities and we feel there will be some additional opportunities presented by this. So, we will continue to be aggressive and continue to plan to grow market share.

All right, thank you so much, best of luck.

Thank you.

[Operator Instructions] We will go next to Scott Rednor with Zelman & Associates.

Good morning and Cary congratulations on the announcement. I wanted to ask, just on the capacity, can you guys frame how much capacity within your plan and however you guys want to contextualize it, how much is expansion is providing for the overall network?

We haven't got any specifics on the past, it definitely takes us into the future by several years, so obviously it’s kind of hard to predict and give specific numbers because it is very depended upon mix, and this plant does give us increased capacity on kind of our core product, which you know solids and paints and so forth. So, based on the trends where we see the market going, it actually has a bigger impact than was in the past because the market is growing where we need it, and where the plant is adding capacity, so it’s valuable capacity, but - they work very good on capacity for several years into the future.

Is it fair to say if - no please go ahead, sorry.

Like I said, as we've talked about this in the past as well as when we did the announcement for the expansion, you know this was the next bottleneck, so we are attacking the bottleneck, it gets is out a couple years and we feel we won't have any pressures, unless the market takes off and then we would all face that challenge at that point in time.

And obviously how we define capacity is depended upon the type of plan, you have a similar capacity and so forth and we have many strategic options available to us to deal with capacity limitations as well. So, we are very well situated going into the future.

So, I guess your general consensus is that, in the market, housing market will get close to 1.5 million housing starts plus or minus if you were to get there, do you guys need another big capacity expansion beyond this or is that sufficient within that contest?

We continue to analyze, I mean that's the important part of our discussions now when we talk about certainly our balance sheet and Kent has mentioned about opportunities as the market grows. We do expect the markets grew, we expect single family – excuse me to give back up to that 1.2 million or so and as it does, yes, we will continue to evaluate opportunities and where we make additional investments, that bricks and mortar, we can’t say that sure yet but we are well positioned as we’ve said in the past we’ll able to take advantage of that.

Okay. And Scott, on the 10b5-1 Plan, can you just maybe give a little more detail what exactly that entails now going forward and why you chose that rail versus repurchasing through the open market?

Yes, I won’t get into the specifics of exactly how we have the plan to establish but we wanted to put one in place because as we found in the past we were limited in our ability to execute in the market because of the overall volume that we see, plus do we trade inside the window, do we trade outside the window that we haven’t engaged for our employees. So we just – we wanted to make sure we have the appropriate level of flexibility to be able to execute trades and purchase going forward, and 10b5 was the best route we saw going forward for that.

And it was in context – you guys will be committed to offsetting dilution, I think that was the prior guidance, is that still fair with this new plan?

That is correct.

Okay, great. And then just lastly, could you with the unit material cost up 2%, was that a fourth quarter comment?

Yes, it was.

So you guys – can you help understand that with your comment on inflation slowing and then I think there was a separate comment that you were seeing hardware to tick up. At what point on the P&L I guess there is a lot of different inputs going on, but what’s the outlook in the near term, should you guys continue to see modest inflation in the P&L or just kind of how are you guys – what are you guys currently seeing in your inventory I guess is a better way to frame it?

Yes, so there were a couple of questions that we wrapped, let me try to segment them into a couple of different buckets to talk through. So the comment with regards to Q4 was a 2% inflation that we are seeing, the pace has slowed and that’s what we keep referencing we’ve done through the last couple of quarters. We still see inflation on certain species, so that’s one of the challenges. You can’t generically just state the trend is up or down, depends on which species you are talking about, you’re looking maple, soft maple, hard maple, you’re looking at cherry, different trends are happening on each of those species. So we’re seeing that play out over the last couple of quarters where the pace of change has slowed. I don’t think it will be stagnant forever, I think there is likely going to be some uptick as we go forward. We started to see some signals of that in lumber pricing reporting but we’ve not incurred any of that actual cost yet. As far as guidance for fiscal year 2016, we are not expecting a significant uptick in inflation. We are assuming it will be somewhat steady to current state.

Great, that’s very helpful. Appreciate the details and congrats on a great quarter guys.

Thank you.

[Operator Instructions] And Mr. Eanes, at this time, there are no other questions in queue. I'll turn it back over to you for closing remarks.

Thank you. Since there are no additional questions, this will conclude our call. Again, thank you for taking time to participate. Speaking on behalf of the management of American Woodmark, we appreciate your continuing support. Thank you, and have a good day.

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for your participation. This does conclude today's conference.