Good day, ladies and gentlemen and welcome to the third quarter 2008 Anderson Inc. earnings conference call. My name is Marcia and I will be your coordinator for today’s call. At this time, all participants and analysts are in a listen-only mode. We will conduct a question-and-answer session toward the end of today’s conference. (Operator instructions). As a reminder this conference call is being recorded for replay purposes. I would now like to turn the call over to Mr. Gary Smith, Vice-President of Finance and Treasury. Please proceed, Sir.

Thank you Marcia and good morning everyone and thanks for joining us in the 2008 third quarter conference call. As you know certain information that I will be discussing today constitutes forward-looking statements. The actual results may differ materially from those presented in the forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including general economic conditions whether in competitive conditions, conditions in the Company’s industry both in the United States and internationally. And the additional factor that is described in the Company’s publicly filed documents including correct filings and the prospectuses prepared in connection with the conference file. Mike Anderson and I will be available for questions after the call. Let me turn it over to him.

Thanks Gary, good morning everyone. As noted in our press release, we generated a record third quarter net income of $12.8 million or $0.70 per diluted shares on revenues of $906 million. In 2007, we recorded net income of $10.6 million or $0.58 per diluted share on $554 million of revenue. Despite the record results we had additional upside opportunities we could have achieved but did not. For the first nine months, our total net income stands at $66.3 million or $3.60 per diluted share. In 2007, we reported net income of $45.3 million or $2.48 per diluted share. Total revenues of $2.7 billion dollars for the first nine months of the year are up $1.1 billion dollars from last year. This revenue growth has come from several sources including higher grain and plant nutrient prices and ethanol sales made on behalf of our joint ventures. Let us start with the grain and ethanol group. It had an operating income of $9.4 million in the third quarter versus $13.7 million a year ago. Income from the grain business increased over the prior year but this was not the case with our equity investments. Grain business continued to benefit from its significantly improved margins on grain sales and from an increase in basis income. Early in the year we had significant basis deterioration but year-to-date basis income is now just below last year. Grain business, however, continues to be impacted by higher cost, interest cost, which increased $2.8 million in comparison to the prior period due to higher grain prices. Income from ethanol business declined $8.8 million during the most recent quarter to a loss of $2 million. This was primarily due to the combined performance of the Company’s investment in the three ethanol limited liability companies. Also, the distillers dried…

Thank you, Mike. The Company’s third quarter year-to-date effective tax rate within 2008 was 36%, unchanged from 2007. We are projecting that will be our four-year tax rate for all of 2008. Interest expense for 2008 third quarter totaled $7.5 million, up more than $3 million for the same period last year. Year-to-date interest expense was $25 million; an increase of approximately $12 million was compared to 2007, $7 million in short-term debt and $5 million dollars in long-term debt was really the factor. Our short-term average interest rates for both the third quarter and the September 30th year-to-date were down approximately 2% compared to 2007. Average short-term borrowings as compared to 2007 were up for both third quarter and year-to-date by $112 million and $247 million dollars, respectively. Short-term borrowings at the end of the third quarter were down in $44 million versus $163 million in 2007. This is significantly different than what you saw in June of 2008 which was a balance of $432 million. The Company’s short-term lines of credit were totally paid off early in October and for the balance of the month, we were investing. Yesterday, we still had excess cash investments of $8 million. When you review our 10Q and the statements of cash flow from operating activities, you will notice some substantial improvements between the second and third quarters 2008. Earnings before interests and taxes for the third quarter of 2008 were $35 million versus $28 million in 2007. The year-to-date EBITDA totaled $151 million, an increase of $48 million for the same period last year. The 2008 third quarter pre-tax earnings include the loss of approximately $600,000 in the equity earnings of affiliates. Year-to-date equity earnings and affiliates totaled $16 million, down more than $1 million dollars from 2007. According to the…

Thanks, Gary. Before we take questions, a few more points, despite the turn of events in fertilizer market, I am pleased with the earnings growth we have achieved so far, especially if we consider that the prior year results included non-recurring gains that were $10.6 million more in pre-tax income than what has been recorded this year. The current guidance of $3.50 to $4 per diluted share was significantly influenced by the recent, sharp decline in global fertilizer prices and the impact it has had on inventory valuation, and will have on margins on the plant nutrient group. In both the first and second quarters, I mentioned that in some point in future there is a risk that the inventory price depreciation we have seen could reverse on one or more of our products. Admittedly, we did not expect for the change in the inventory pricing to occur so quickly, otherwise, we would not have owned so much inventory. Current guidance was also partially attributable for the economics in the ethanol industry which have continued to worsen. It is also important to remember that with the diversity of our business units, there are numerous factors that could impact the full year results. Examples of which are further changes in plant nutrient prices and grain prices, the timing of the sales of rail cars and the performance of our equity investments, which includes the ethanol production plants in Lansing Trade Group. If the year progresses, we will continue to revisit our earnings forecast before we will update our guidance at the time.

Ladies and gentlemen (Operator’s instruction) and your first question comes from the line of Heather Jones from market. Please proceed. Analyst for Heather Jones - BB & T Capital Markets: Hey guys, this is Brad speaking in behalf of Heather. How are you doing?

I did not sound like Heather, Brad. Analyst for Heather Jones - BB & T Capital Markets: I wanted to delve back into rail, real quick. Mike, you talked about the down turn in the economy affecting the business and possible acquisitions arising there. I just wanted to go through some of the trends you are seeing in your own operations, thus far in the quarter, and your expectations for the business going forward there.

I just to want to make sure I understand. That was a broader company comment, not a rail question. Is that correct? Analyst for Heather Jones - BB & T Capital Markets: Right. That is right. That is about rail.

Ok, well, we do see, for some period of time, car loads of all types, for some period of time over a year, almost every month, not every month but almost every month, the total car loads get recorded and been hold on rail lines and they have continued to go down I think clearly reflecting economic slowdown. And as you take cars off the rail lines, generally, the rail lines get more efficient so the cars turn a little faster. We been blessed up till this time, and I reported our utilization rate, is actually increased in the third quarter versus a quarter a year ago. But we would suspect with the fact that we still are dealing with, what I call, the final phase of new car buildings coming into the market and leases unwinding and general slowdown that there will be a little more challenged to keep the utilization rate above the level we have it so that is the kind as we look forward on the base business. But typically, it is at that point in time that we are given, historically, there has been opportunity to step in and acquire cars, and our place is in the used car space so we would expect this to create some opportunities when we can acquire some more cars and grow the fleet, to take advantage of a cycle that goes up. And we have most of our rail cars are in long term leases, three, five, seven-year leases. So, at any given year, I am just going to saying, on the average, usually no more than 20% of our fleet is coming off lease, and a good chunk of those will be re-let right away but also we expect to have cars returned to us. And just in this environment, maybe, it will be little harder to place in. Gary, you want to add further commentary to that?

Well, the re-let rates have been coming down, but remember the bases in our cars are older so as a result, our spreads are pretty much maintained or improving. Analyst for Heather Jones - BB & T Capital Markets: That is all for you, guys. I appreciate the color. There is something I want to talk about, we have looked at your ethanol production investments and looking at it for Q3 here. What we are assuming that Albion & Climbers made money. So, is there anything unusual during this quarter or is Greenville losing more on a cash basis. Can you take us through the performance there?

Actually, Climbers did not make money, it is actually Albion was just below break-even. And one of his reasons was that we had a relatively minor exposure right at the end of the second quarter, and we ran out of production for 3 to 4 weeks, and so almost one-third of the quarter, and we paid a little price for that and ended up slightly below break-even. So, the bulk of the loss was in Greenville and if you look on the financial statements, that was the earnings of the affiliates. Gary, why don’t you take them through a breakdown of that? You can get back into the team number.

Analyst for Heather Jones - BB & T Capital Markets: Gary, what else is in that minority interest line?

It is virtually all that investments that we …

TEAI that owns 50% of gain and that TAEI has 2/3 of us and one-third Mitsui and, in essence at this point in time you can assume virtually all of that line related to that investment. I do want to add you did just start up Greenville. I talked before about the fact that we did not have the ability to get forward contracts on a crunch and it has the crunch on at profitable levels and we bid more on the spot market which has been negative margins. I would say through the start-up, and we are now multiple months into it, we are getting about a 5% less yield of ethanol per bushel corn in that facility that are under two, and we are working on to try to get that up to get to the other two, but in essence that yield is for the same amount of corn that we put through, if we can get up with a same yield we get 5% more gallons at current market price in the vicinity of $8 million dollars, then you have got a net offset if you have less distiller’s dry grain. But we would say that would be a $6 million dollar item for the entity five to six million. We are working on a number of other things in that particular facility. But we are not operating as efficiently as the other two and we have got higher cost. It was built later and was built with some higher costs than the other two. But we have got to continue to focus on getting this more productive and more efficient. Analyst for Heather Jones - BB & T Capital Markets: And what is the main hamper on that yield.

Well, if we knew exactly what it was, we probably would have it. And that is what we are focusing on. Analyst for Heather Jones - BB & T Capital Markets: Ok. I just have a real quick last question and I will jump in the queue. I appreciate you guys answering my questions. When we look at the core-grain handling business, year-to-date we are estimating it has lost around on $3 million dollars when you adjust for the ethanol production and Lansing. And then we are comparing that to roughly $1 million in earnings for the first three quarters of 2007 and $8 million in earnings for the first three quarters of 2006. I think you pretty much answered my questions in your prepared remarks but have you pretty much gotten back that hit that you saw earlier on basis this year? And what do you anticipate as far as next year’s performance for core-grain?

We have gotten back most of that hit. I am not going to get in to breaking up the numbers that we do not break out. But your numbers are … Thank you, we have done better that you suggested in the base frame business. But we have gotten the bulk of it back and we have seen improved basis depreciation especially when we even end of the third quarter. So, we had to bear this year, I am talking about the call a little bit ago. Substantial amount of additional interest cost, I say, higher than normal interest costs. And we have had some fair value adjustments on grain with the risk of contract defaults. So, in a highly volatile market, I can look back and say here, we have made good decisions, here we made bad. But, generally, I am reasonably pleased with what has occurred now. We have got through those problems, through the third quarter and what has come back in income and feel good about that position and our recent acquisition of additional space. Analyst for Heather Jones - BB & T Capital Markets: Thank you much, guys.

Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Farha Aslam from Stephens Inc. Please proceed.

Good morning. I am just starting off with the plant nutrients. Could you share with us how your purchase contracts are structured for plant nutrient?

Well, I will talk about two things; one is inventory and the other is forward contracts. In inventory, we generally own our own inventory. We will have inventory here held for someone else in the market and on forward contracts, there are times when we make forward projections and have a sense of the volume that we are going to be supplied by huge suppliers. This is not always price and then we have the ability to make price commitment. In this situation that we just gone through, we are projecting our anticipated fall and early winter usage and given where the prices were and our concerns about availability of the inventory and the fact that at that time, we had inventory and forward purchases priced below the market, the apparent market or real market, that existed in, say, early August. Well, we owned a fair amount of that. Well. It has turned out that obviously its prices have plummeted and when that has occurred, demand is really shut down. So, in essence we own inventory and we often have fixed-priced forward contracts.

Are you required to buy a certain amount every month and prices every month? Or do you have flexibility now?

We have flexibility, other than the fact that the reality that fertilizer is not a just in time product. So, at any point in time, we do not have to take product if we have not committed to it. So we could say we do not want it and we could take the risk that later on when we will need it, we will be able to get it. But our experience has shown that we better be in the position to take advantage of the space we have and more often than not, we have had inventory escalation. But we are not forcing as far as when someone is saying, here it is you got to take it at this price. It is our decision. We pull the trigger and now we have some hindsight that says do not pull the trigger out too much, too early.

And that $13 million, that is the marked down as of September 30th and then, the pricing declines again in October and we will take additional hits in the fourth quarter? How much is that factoring in?

The $13 million that is… I mean you are right. It is as of September 30th, except that the fertilizer market is not near as transparent and it is called a futures market, it does not trade as much. So, in determining what the total amount of that revaluation should be on forward purchases and inventory, we have the reality of knowing what prices were doing through the month of October. And so, that was factored into our decision. And obviously, we still had a good quarter compared to history and if you look up where we are at year-to-date as a company, and you look at what we are projecting within our guidance range for the fourth quarter, obviously suggests a poor fourth quarter and a substantial amount of that is the fact that we expect additional inventory devaluation and margin compression in that particular business. Now that we are in early November, we think we have a pretty good handle on that. On the other hand, let us see what goes between now and then.

If you had to take a look at your holdings generally, are you a third, a third and a third, for that nitrogen and potash?

I honestly do not know the answer to that at this point in time.

That is approximately what we sell, however, but that may not necessarily be what we are holding.

Of the three, right now, we have had nitrogen and phosphates are the commodities that is wobbly, that was in nitrogen, urea has gone down more than ammonia has, for example. But nitrogen and phosphate should be the ones that have shown the most depreciation and potash has not shown much in the way of appreciation.

Any thoughts on potash prices and do you think that once the strike in Canada is resolved, you are going to see potash prices decline? Is that factored in at all into your thought?

We have taken a look at each of the commodities and what is in the commodities all of our products and dissected it and used all our best estimates at this time as we factored in our guidance for the year. And I am going to avoid your question on specific price notification on potash. Although, I would say is that its fundamentals are a little different in the sense that it is little less in supply. There is more supply constraints. There are still the existing strikes in a few mines. So, probably our view is that there a little less risk there for substantial price depreciation. It appears to be holding up and one of the things that happened, I mentioned it in the conference call, there is a truth. Demand for protein base will continue to be strong. We have now switched the fertilizer front from being the real supply concerns, almost a concern that I cannot get the product, but at least, in nitrogen and phosphate, there is reasonable supply today and a reasonable pipeline. The same is not necessarily the case in potash. As farmers delay their decision on utilization now, that just puts a higher likelihood that when we get to the spring that they are going to need more.

And then when you look at your ethanol business, your plants currently, you were saying Albion aside from the production issues and Greenville are profitable, if you had to go and run those plants without the hedges you have, do you think they would be profitable today?

No.

No, and as you look out, are you still completely largely unhedged on your ethanol production for the next year?

Correct. We are virtually, I mean, if you get out the next year we have very, very little odds. So, the stock market, I say no. The stock market is rightly, really interesting with oil prices plummeting as much as they have. Ethanol which was trading $0.60 to $0.80 below wholesale unleaded, now trading $0.30 above wholesale unleaded. So ethanol is obviously is not fallen all as much as grain but we have had all this capacity in general. This is a generalization, just in the spot market, without taking of position in either being long or short on ethanol, spot market margins tended to be in the break-even to loss situation for some extended period of time. And that is where we are right now. And I think we have to work through this capacity build-up that we have had before. And there has been, as you have seen fallout in the ethanol industry here. Fallout in the sense of some Chapter 11’s which had production still going out but also some holding on some projects and some closedowns. So the capacity volume-side has got to be reconciled and back in line with what the demand is, I think, before we get back in to the profitable side, which we believe will happen. And I said a quick no. We are doing some significant things to figure to work out, figure out how to get more productive, more efficient, take cost out of the energy side of the equation. So, I gave you abrupt answer but that really then creates a challenge for us to operate better than we have been.

So, if you have to guess on when capacity will catch up with demand? Would you put those six months out? Twelve months out?

You know, I am thinking in terms of 6 and 12 and 18 months, not 2 and 3 years. But the thing that I do not really have a good handle on is how fragile or not fragile a number of these entities that are out there today are with the balance sheet is, what the credit situation is now. What hedges they have or they do not have. How they handle risk management. So, I do not have a good handle on potential fallout for that could be a factor that could actually shorten the time frame before stuff gets imbalanced.

Okay.

And I guess you do not really have a good handle on what happens with the demand for gasoline now at $2 per gallon versus $4 per gallon.

Okay, and my final questions is, is there difficulties in the ethanol industry creating opportunities for you to look in plants by grain source facilities or plants?

Could you repeat that again, I just want to make sure…?

You have the opportunities to pick up some ethanol plants at very, very good prices or have you been looking at the grain storage capacity at ethanol plans?

The least we did in Illinois is elevate our cash to an ethanol plant but I will say from the most part on grain storage side, our opportunities I believe will generally be independent of the ethanol plants, but I would not say that completely. So the shakeup will create some opportunities on the ethanol side. I would say right now our focus, although we are trying to stay aware and abreast of the next potential buyout capacity, especially with our concept to provide service and risk management. Our major focus is operating the plants that we have right now, operating them better.

Ok, thank you for your answers.

Our next question comes from the line of Michael Cox from Piper Jaffray. Please proceed. Michael Cox – Piper Jaffray: Hi, good morning. Thanks for taking my questions.

Hi Mike. Michael Cox – Piper Jaffray: My first question is on the plant nutrient side. I was hoping you could comment on how long it will take to burn through the inventory position you have in fertilizer as it gets replaced with lower cost fertilizer?

Great question. We know that the product that we have in here will easily be used into this fertilizer season. What we do not know is, now the price has come down some and the weather is still good, will demand pick up again this fall? We are moving a little bit but it is still slow. And what the early winter spring season is. But we will use it up certainly in the season. We know we will use the inventory, what we do not have a good handle on is where will prices ultimately end up and if they hit the floor, will they bounce back, for example, in urea which has dropped, depending on the market you are in, as much as 50% from its peaks. It appears to have bounced back off the wall. So, I would say knowing that, what I am about to say is a forward statement and therefore subject to changes in the market, that we feel we have embedded in our guidance for this year, the vast majority hopefully all of the potential shift relative to the inventory contracts we have. Now having said that I cannot be certain of that, and then, it is possible to stop, it is possible that we do not take as much this fourth quarter, stuff can move over into the first quarter. But I think that we certainly, as we get into the next year, into the planting season for sure, we are back to what I would call, from our perspective, into a more normal margin situation and I would not. I think I would stupid of me to suggest that we won’t have price appreciation opportunities as we get that time frame next year. Michael Cox – Piper Jaffray: As we look at the volumes here in the fourth quarter, given the extended harvest season, did you anticipate volumes to decline into the fourth quarter?

I think overall volumes were decline. They have been down so far, and we already have wonderful weather, but this has been with grain prices seemed to have hit the floor or the shelf but they bounced up a little bit. Farmers have, this is a generalization or on a very good casual situation like the generalization because we know there is always a situation that is not the case. But with input prices where they are, and the sense that they might go lower, that creates an incentive by a little as you can and that can backfire on somebody too because we still have really good fundamentals in agriculture. We just have to work through what I call as supply and demand equilibrium, a strong demand and not enough supply, to enough supply, not enough demand. But you will get back in balance as you have seen some recent shutdowns in phosphate capacity, both in US and overseas. Michael Cox – Piper Jaffray: Okay, just from a theoretical standpoint, could you remind us what type of impact, if any, you would feel from a shift in plantings from corn to soya, something like that, given the volatility that we have seen in corn prices?

Right at this point, we have produced in the range of 85 to 86 million acres this year. And I have seen projections up for next year. I think the highest site I have seen is 90 and I have seen as low as 83 to 84. We are feeling flattish year over year. We look at the supply to demand table in corn. We are going to reduce… Just a second. Here we go. We are projecting we carried in this year about 1.6 billion bushels of corn. And we are projecting that we are going to carry out between 1 billion to 1.2 billion next year. We had production of 12 billion, usage of 12 ½ billion. I do not maybe, usage drops a little maybe a little high maybe drop ethanol a little bit. But the bottom line is we got to keep producing corn. It is very hard for me to develop a scenario much downside from the acres we had this year. I grant it, when it is all said and done, the prices that farmers will get this spring will have a major impact on that. So, obviously, if we go lower, in corn, then we use less nitrogen. And corn is king for our fertilizer business. I am not seeing much downside from this past year’s acreage. Michael Cox – Piper Jaffray: For my last question, on the storage capacity on the grain side, are you seeing additional opportunities to add capacity there given some of the financial constraints that some of these smaller players may be facing right now?

You know, about July 1, I was kind of sitting here saying, oh boy, we are going to get quite a few opportunities but with prices now having plummeted, anybody that might have been challenged with working capital in the first half of the year, was put back into a reasonably good situation. Right now, wheat prices are $3 below what they were a year ago, over $3 below. Beans are slightly lower. Corn is pretty flat. So, in general, I think, those in the grain business, although we have to suffer with the high interest cost, most of us with storage has some reasonably good time once you put that behind you. So, we are going to be on the lookout. And there are always companies or owners that have a desire to sell. And we are going to be looking for opportunities but I do not sense much in the way of distressed sale opportunities coming around. Michael Cox – Piper Jaffray: Sounds good. Thank you very much.

Thanks Mike.

And your next question comes from the line of Joel Gleason from Oppenheimer. Please proceed. Joseph A. Gomes, Jr - Oppenheimer & Company: Good morning, most of my questions has been answered but I just had couple of quick ones here. On the rail car assets that has been for sale in the GE and CIT, any sense further on what is going on in those sales? Are they getting closer to breaking that up or can you give us more detail there?

Yes, the word on the streets was that initially, the GATX was going to acquire the GE fleet and that transaction has apparently fallen apart. We would have expected, that since we probably are in not in a position to acquire a fleet that size, any fallout from that kind of a transaction in terms of excess that they would have, we would get a shot at going after. And so until something happens, GE makes some decisions about it, I do not think that they are planning on piecemealing it off. But if they do, we are friendly with them and they have been a good source of inventory for us and we will be in a good position to start buying. Wachovia has the other big fleet, and since they are being acquired by Wells, we are not sure what their long term objectives are. We are very close with Wells and we will be very happy to help them deal with that fleet if they are not interested in retaining it. And CIT, from what we can tell, has decided to hang on to their fleet, at least at this point. Joseph A. Gomes, Jr - Oppenheimer & Company: Okay, and one other on the ethanol side, seeing the recent news that the on VeraSun and then going bankrupt, but still operating their plants, does that put more pressure, do you think, on the ethanol industry itself or is it going to be more of just the same?

If you are to take a bankrupt facility and write the debt down, and write off the equity, then you now have a new basis that is substantially below what the new construction cost was, I think, you got an advantage. Now, you have got to get a good financing and you have got to get it at a reasonable rate, you have got to recapitalize the business that does not necessarily change all the non-up front capital cost dynamics that is going on in the market. And I think, as Mike outlined, they are somewhat stressed right now. Joseph A. Gomes, Jr - Oppenheimer & Company: Okay, thanks.

I would like to add on the VeraSun beside the Chapter 11, they did announce, I believe it was yesterday, that they have under construction a 110-million gallon plant in Minnesota that was close to complete. They go through all this and that might get completed but in the meantime, that production was not coming on what it was planned to. And I think that is not the only one. It is not only in VeraSun but I mean within the industry.

There are no further questions at this time. I would like to turn over the call back over to management.

Okay, thank you for joining us this morning. Our next conference call is scheduled for Friday, February 6, that is at 11 AM, Eastern, to review yearend results. Hope you will be able to join us and hope you have a wonderful day. Thank you and see you.

Thank you for your participation in today’s conference call. This concludes the presentation and you may now disconnect. Good day.