Good day, everyone and welcome to the Abercrombie & Fitch Fourth Quarter Earnings Results Conference. Today's conference is being recorded. (Operator Instructions). We will open the call to take your questions at the end of the presentation. We ask that you limit yourself to one question during the question-and-answer session. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Mr. Tom Lennox, please go ahead, sir.

Good afternoon and welcome to our fourth quarter and 2006 fiscal year end conference call. After the market closed, we publicly released the quarterly sales and earnings release, balance sheet, income statement and an updated financial history. If you haven't seen these materials, they are available on our web site. This call is being taped and can be replayed by dialing 888-203-1112. You will need to reference the conference ID number 6004097. You may also access the replay through the Internet at abercrombie.com. With me today are Mike Jeffries, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; Mike Kramer, Chief Financial Officer; Mike Nuzzo, Vice President of Finance, and Brian Logan, the company's Controller. Today's earnings call will be limited to one hour. After our prepared comments, we will be available to take your questions for as long as time permits. Please limit yourself to one question, so that we can speak with as many callers as possible. Before we begin, I'd remind you that any forward-looking statements, we may make today are subject to the Safe Harbor statement found in our SEC filings. Now to Mike Jeffries.Mike Jeffries: Good afternoon. Our fourth quarter results capped another excellent year for Abercrombie & Fitch. The company's strong performance demonstrates the proper positioning of our brands and the strength of our business model. Investments we make in our brands and business continue to pay off in the form of high quality sales and earnings growth. This is a strategy that we will continue to employ in 2007. Before Mike Kramer gives us the financial results, I will spend a few minutes discussing our investment strategy, which we believe will enable us to drive and support the company's future top line and bottom line growth. The first area of investment is new concepts and the expansion…

Thanks Mike. Good afternoon. Fiscal 2006 fourth quarter net sales for the 14 weeks ended February 3rd, 2007 increased 18% to $1.139 billion from $961.4 million for the 13 weeks ended January 28th, 2006. As our press release states, the fiscal 2006 retail calendar includes a 53rd week. Fourth quarter comps are compared to the 14 week period ended February 4th, 2006. Total company comparable store sales declined 3% in the fourth quarter. By region, comps were strongest in the New York and Mid-Atlantic region and weakest in the west region. For the 53 week fiscal year ended February 3rd, 2007 net sales increased 19%, reaching $3.318 billion versus $2.785 billion for the 52 week period ended January 28th, 2006. Comparable store sales increased 2% in fiscal 2006. Fiscal 2006 direct-to-consumer net sales increased 42% over fiscal 2005. The fourth quarter gross profit rate was 66.4%, 10 basis points lower compared to last year. The decline in gross profit rate was primarily due to higher strength and a slightly higher markdown rate versus last year. For fiscal 2006, the gross profit rate was 66.6% versus 66.5% last year, an increase of 10 basis points versus last year. We ended the fourth quarter with inventories up 6% per gross square foot at cost versus last year. In-line with the guidance provided on our third quarter conference call. When we estimated that yearend inventory would be flat to slightly positive on a per-square-foot at cost basis. Going forward, we expect to end the first quarter of 2007 with inventory flat to slightly positive on a per-square-foot at cost basis, compared to the first quarter of 2006. Stores and distribution expense for the quarter, as a percentage of sales, increased 20 basis points to 30.7% versus 30.5% last year. The increase in rate…

(Operator Instructions). We'll go first to Dana Cohen, Banc of America.

Hi. Good afternoon, guys.

Hi, Dana.

Mike, maybe if you can just talk a little bit about, what you are seeing with respect to fashion and how you feel about each of the businesses going into the spring?

As we look at our business, we continue to have really good results in tops. Female tops business continues very strong, as it has been, and the male business in tops is very strong. The biggest wild card is female bottoms. We have really great success with shorts and we are anticipating that as a percent of our business that's going to grow, as we develop or we hope to find some warm weather. I believe that that's going to be the biggest difference in the business. Our craft business is poor. It's poor in denim and its poor in twill, but the short business is excellent. So as that becomes a bigger percentage of our business, we hope to see improvements there. But the really positive thing about our business is the continued growth of the tops business, in all of our brands and I would say that's a bird's eye view.

We'll go next to Jeff Klinefelter, Piper Jaffray.

Yes. Thank you and congratulations, everyone on a solid year.

Thank you.

In terms of the international expansion, Mike and Mike, if you want, just comment a little bit more on how we should think about the economic model? I know it's just starting and you're going with one flagship. But they are very different markets in terms of the availability of real estate and the cost of real estate and others have struggled in the past. Can you talk at all about how you think about the IRR at the firm? Is this going to be same sort of investment hurdle rates from a financial perspective and just anything else you can share on what we should anticipate?

Kramer?

Yeah, in terms of our international expansion business plan, we are anticipating keeping the same hurdle rates. We do understand that there's going to be a cost increase related to occupancy. We also understand there will be a cost increase related to payroll in certain areas. But we also believe that there will be something to offset that and that is our pricing and what we will be able to price our product as compared to what you are actually seeing in U.S. dollars here domestically. So, net now, we are looking at really no difference from a bottom line perspective, particularly may be even an increase. So, hopefully that answered your question. In terms of international expansion, and Mike can add to this, that I want to point out something that was called out in terms of our script, is the acceleration, if you will, in terms of Hollister. We are very excited about Hollister expansion overseas and we believe we are well positioned to do that and we are already, as we've been looking for great property for A&F, we are starting to see great property for Hollister as well.

I think you said it very well.

We'll go next to Randall Koenig, Bear Stearns.

Thank you very much. A question just for Mike Kramer. You talked a little bit about on the IT projects underway planning and allocation etcetera. Do you have some sort of timeline you could provide us with? And in terms of the spending on that, in third quarter I think you mentioned some of your spend on IT, 50% was capitalized, 50% was expense to P&L. How do you see that ratio playing out in '07? And are you taking any different differentiated steps towards the distribution as you'll pursue international growth; you can have a distribution center in Europe per say etcetera?

That's a long question.

I had to put it in.

I'll see what I can do. In terms of the ratio, CapEx to expense, I don't see any change to that. Again, we are increasing our CapEx with regards to IT year-to-year; we're also increasing our expense as well. I'm glad you asked this question, because this is really important for people to understand. In terms of CapEx, in 2006, we spent $26 million. Now, what we've done is I've tried to break this down to four key categories for people to understand really the movement and strategy related to Abercrombie & Fitch. Of that $26 million, I'm going to break this down to four categories. One is compliance, one is maintenance, one is innovation, and one is growth. If you take a look at that $26 million in 2006, we spent 10% on compliance, 68% on maintenance, 0% on innovation, 24% on growth. Now, let me be very cautious here, when I say innovation, I am not talking about first to market in technology. We are talking about best practice and new technology to us that is proven technology. So, let's take that same four categories and look at 2007. We're again looking at 10% compliance; maintenance would be 24%; innovation, 27%; growth, 39%. To give you a little bit of indication of what falls within the growth category, obviously the new brands, Concept Five. We're going to enhance direct-to-consumer, expansion into the U.K., these are all things that we consider growth. In terms of innovation, I've talked about wireless technology within our stores for efficiency, storeroom management for efficiency and as we indicated in our script, business intelligence. So, hopefully that gives somebody some idea in terms of we're moving our entire organization from a true spending dollars on maintenance, to try and to minimize our go-forward maintenance and be able to use those same dollars for what we would call items that will help us in the future from an efficiency and a growth perspective. With regards to the DC expansion, we're still working through our DC strategy with regards to international. Again, some of this is going to be dictated by where these are located. I'm not going to invest significantly in any kind of what I would call capital expense for a distribution center for one store. And again, we've highlighted where we're going to go from an international perspective but the availability of quality real estate is really going dictate the cadence of whether it's located in the U.K. or Japan, from a second store, third store, fourth store. So, we're taking a look at that. And on a short-term perspective from a distribution perspective, we are looking at sourcing a portion of this out. So hopefully, I've answered that question.

We'll go next to Jennifer Black, Jennifer Black Associates.

Good afternoon. I wondered, Mike, if you are happy with your feedbacks at all divisions? And would you consider adding a size to your division, such as, say, a 14 to Abercrombie and a 13 at Hollister. And I know your skirts don't go up as high either. Can you comment on this?

Yeah. I'm happy with what we're assorting at this point. As we look at our size selling, it doesn't indicate that there would be appreciable increase in the business if we added a size. I will say that in female bare tops, our sizing is a little small and we can see that by our outselling larges. We hope to have that corrected for the summer season. But other than that, I'm pleased with where we are. Thank you.

We'll go next to Brian Tunick, J.P. Morgan.

Thanks, hey guys. Two quick ones, just one about the other income line, maybe just talk a little more about what's happening there? And then secondly, I'm intrigued about Canada. Mike, your comments about how profitable it is? When can we see Hollister's there and what exactly is causing the four-wall returns to be I think you said triple the U.S. returns?

Let me speak to the other income. The $4.5 million in other income, majority of that relates to income related to gift card breakage. Roughly $3.5 million of that is related to that. Your question in terms of profitability in Canada, keep in mind, the average footprint of our stores in Canada are similar if not exact to our stores in the United States. We do have a high fixed cost there but given the fact that the sales productivity is three times, that just means that you're flowing an extraordinary amount to the bottom line. Because I only have a 5% to 7% variable expense structure. So, having said that, there in-lies the profitability that we're seeing with regards to Canada. The pricing is not that much different in terms of our Canadian business. In terms of your question with regards to Hollister, we already have three Hollister stores in Canada, and they're doing very, very well. And as indicated, that gives us a lot of confidence with regards to the iconic nature of the brand outside of the United States, as well as just in terms of volume, what we could possibly do, coupled with the Internet sales internationally outside of this continent. Hopefully, I answered everything.

We'll go next to Lorraine Maikis, Merrill Lynch.

Thank you, good afternoon.

Hi Lorraine.

Hi. Do you plan to use your free cash flow to buy back stock this year and is that in your guidance?

The quick answer to that is the same answer that we've given you in the past, that we're going to take a look at our cash flow needs from a CapEx perspective, the availability based on our window and any excess cash over the 350 limit that our CEO has demanded, we will definitely get back into the market. And I would say that if there was any particular buyback, that yes, it would be built in term into the forward-looking guidance.

We'll go next to Janet Kloppenburg, JJK Research.

Good afternoon and congratulations on a great year.

Thanks Janet.

Welcome. Couple of questions. I know that the RUEHL is projected to breakeven or add to profitability maybe in '07. The investment in Concept Five is going up. Can you tell me how that will net out in terms of the effect on the bottom line? And Mike, with similar level of comp in '07, as you delivered in '06; can you leverage your store expense line? And now we too assume that Hollister will grow, expand internationally in '07? And my last question is if Mike could just talk about the outlook for the denim business in both the first half and second half of '07? Thank you.

Okay. That's great list. Kramer, you start with investments and we'll go from there.

In terms of our RUEHL profit in '07, we have not indicated in terms of dollar amount. What we've indicated is that we are on our glide path to profitability in the latter part of this year, 2007.

Mike, if you combine that with -- if you look at what your projection is versus what you're investing in Concept Five where we net out at a loss on both concepts?

The answer to that question is yes.

Okay.

But I'm not going to indicate how much. I want to elaborate something on this, is that in terms of Concept Five, we started investing significantly in C5 in advance, if you take a look at the business model with regards to RUEHL. I anticipate to be more profitable out of the gate, than we were with regards to RUEHL, when we started opening our store base there. We've been able to have time to look at cost reengineering. We've been able to have time to really scope this out, so that we actually can start out the gates in a better situation with C5 than we did RUEHL. But as always, there's cost associated with startup of a new concept. Can we leverage S&D in 2000? The answer to that is we're going to do a little flip-flop on you guys this year. Last year, we've leveraged stores and distribution and we didn't in MG&A. This year you're going to see leverage in MG&A. In fact, what we're hoping to do is hold our dollars per quarter on an MG&A flat for the entire year. How can we do this? One is, we're still investing. We're still going to hire people. We're not going to hire people at the rate that we have done in the past. But some of our investment in terms of technology is starting to payoff. In terms of efficiency and it will allow us to reallocate resources as well. In terms of stores and distribution, again, we've said that we will leverage stores and distribution on a flat-to-moderate comp. However, there's some fixed costs that have been added to the plate this year. One of them is the minimum wage, which I have indicated is roughly around $6 million a season. And that's the biggest hurdle. We also have a small pre-opening and those kind of things. But the largest impact is payroll-related minimum wage and the increase to our managers as we have indicated in the past, because we want to try to retain the talent out there as much as we can and be more competitive.

Let me go to question three, which is will there be a Hollister international store in 2007. The answer is no. We are anticipating the first would be in 2008. We are developing a flagship Hollister concept that will play in the U.S. and internationally. We have obviously been very successful with the flagship concept in A&F from two points of view. One, in terms of the return. And two, that it stretches us to make improvements in the fleet that we design into the flagship. So, I'm very excited about that prospect, so expect to see that starting in 2008 from a domestic and an international point of view. So, no expansion in Hollister in 2007. The fourth part of your question was denim. I anticipate that the women's and men's denim business will continue negative for the first half of this year. In women's, the negative is arising from a craft business that is not good. In women's, I anticipate a total increase second half in women's denim and a flat performance in men's denim. That's what we are projecting and I feel pretty comfortable with that. Thanks, Janet.

We'll go next to Stacy Pak, Prudential.

Great. Hi. Can you hear me?

Hi, Stacy. Yeah.

Hi. Okay. A couple things, one is Mike, can you tell us what you expect or hope to get out of the these new allocation, planning and sourcing systems that you are putting in place and address whether the investments your making in systems and these growth initiatives you have been talking about should hit or negatively impact the operating margin overtime, whether the operating margin should be maintained or increased, and if you can quantify, if there's a change there? And then second of all, I'd like to you clarify what you said at the beginning of the call on comp. I think what you said is you started out similar to January, which I believe was like negative six, and now you are improving. So, should we be looking for a positive comp in February or where are you going with that? And then third, Mike Jeffries, I was hoping you could comment, why you haven't been able to come through with a stronger comp? Do you think there is an issue with newness? Do you think the sales per square foot are simply too high? Or do you think it's the weather, which clearly there has been an impact? Thanks.

I'll start off with regards to what do we anticipate in terms of our investment in allocations, planning and sourcing. The one is, we want to have a very cohesive supply chain. And not only are we looking at efforts to basically increase our time to market, which enables us much more flexibility. It also hopefully will be quicker to market and therefore, maybe negatively impact in terms of the competition, in terms of copying us. But in terms of also accuracy, we also expect efficiency with regards to having, I would say, much more simpler systems to be able to diminish the amount of time needed for training and therefore, become much more productive with regards to our staffing in the entire supply chain. The second question with regard to comps, I'm not going to tell you what I'm expecting. What we tried to do is give you guidance in terms of and I think that in essence it alluded to somewhat the weather. I am really glad that you asked this question. And Mike can actually elaborate on this further. The Mother Nature wasn't good to us in Q4. I actually got comments from a lot of you with regards to, prior to Christmas and in terms of the unseasonably warm weather and then last two weeks of January being very, very frigid. But what I want to say and then I'll turn it over to Mike is, I'm so proud of this organization in terms of how we ended the quarter in terms of our carryover, in terms of our margin, in terms of Q4, given the fact that Mother Nature was not cooperative this year.

And let me tackle the total comp issue, Stacy. I think we obviously are at very high level of productivity in our brands. I don't foresee huge increases in our future because we are highly productive and consistently productive. Having said that, I think we can get comp store increases at a better rate than we experienced fourth quarter. Clearly, fourth quarter had some problems and you've never heard me talk about weather, but it was a perfectly dreadful scenario for our business from a weather point of view. We were also up against big denim figures that over time will mitigate. And I answered Janet in terms of how I saw that going and where I see the female bottoms business going, which has been the biggest drag on the business. I think if shorts turn out to be what we think they're going to be, it will make an impact on the business in terms of comps. There is also another factor that I would like to discuss, and that is that the business that trended off the most in terms of trend was Hollister female tops. We did that to ourselves. What we did was to convert that brand to a soft sensor system that replaced hard tags. And we mentioned in the narrative that our shrink was higher than last year. The place where it really impacted the business was in Hollister, Betty's women's tops. And the point was our shrink was so high that it affected the volume levels. Now, this is significant in the business. We have as of a week ago converted the stores back to hard tag, but the most dreadful result of the shrink and converted to unit loss per store, it was staggering, was a loss in volume. I think that that has been a significant impact on the business. I think that we can do better than we have done for all the reasons that I have mentioned and I think we would. I would not expect wild increases on a comp basis in this business on an ongoing basis. But it's not necessary to continue to run a highly profitable business. And the point of our business is our consistency. I really have to say that. We had a lot of factors affect us fourth quarter. We did not alter how we ran the business and we will not. Don't expect us to. We'll continue to invest in better product, better stores, better people, to continue this great consistency. Good question. Thanks.

We'll go next to Jeff Black, Lehman Brothers.

Yeah, thanks. Question for Mike Jeffries, I guess. I noticed that kids' is getting a significant expansion this year. And I'm just wondering, if you are seeing anything different or what you are seeing different in that business that we didn't see the last couple of years? And really does it suggest you are looking at a higher store target for the little stores? Thanks.

The answer is yes. We had not been aggressively expanding kids and with the success in kids over the last year and-a-half or two years, it clearly opened up more store locations than we had been contemplating before. We think that we can take that brand to about 250 locations. And we are embarked upon doing that at this point. Thanks.

We'll go next to Margaret Mager, Goldman Sachs.

Hi, it's Margaret.

Hey, Margaret.

Hi, Margaret.

Congratulations on a great year, fantastic. I don't think most people would have thought could you have done that at the beginning of '06.

Thank you.

I wanted to ask about how you managed the inventory. Kramer is just commenting how proud you are that you managed through the fourth quarter, despite the weather to come out with just a very slight increase in the markdown rate and a very good position on the inventory. How are you doing that and what role do factory outlet stores play, if it's meaningful at all? And then secondly, could you talk about your non-apparel categories, intimates, accessories, footwear, personal care, how important were they in 4Q in '06 and what's the outlook on those categories at Abercrombie and Hollister? And then, gift cards, was it meaningful this season? And just curious, Tokyo, will that open in '07? Thanks.

Okay. So, we can kick off the inventory. I think what we had demonstrated over time is that we are very good as a company in flowing merchandise in relation to demand. We are very nimble in that regard. And the factory outlets, the outlet stores, which we don't have many, play a very insignificant role. We use those stores totally for quality problems and we liquidate inventory within our own stores. But it's -- I think if you look historically at our business, one of the key factors in maintaining and growing the gross margin rate that we have over the years, has been our ability to flow merchandise efficiently into the stores. Kramer, would you like to comment?

Absolutely. As Mike indicated, we are constantly assessing and our ability in terms of our quickness to market, and our ability to pull and flip triggers with regards to our inventory allows us to be very, very nimble with regards to what we're reading out there in terms of sales. Those of you who know me know that I'm pretty involved in that process. In terms of the accessory classification, we grew the accessory business at a greater rate than the total business. We had a good business in sleepwear. But it's not a major business. We had a good business in totes, footwear is not a business that we're in except for flip-flops and that's not a fourth quarter business. But it did grow at a better rate than the company and I anticipated it doing so in the future. We're committed to growing that business. If you're including personal care fragrance as a part of that, that business continues to grow as a percentage of our business, which I think is just a testimony to the strength of our brands. And we're excited about how that business continues to grow and the profitability of that business. That business is like printing money. We like it very much. Now, I am going to talk about the gift cards and I'll talk about Tokyo. Okay. Gift cards, I guess the answer to this question depends on what your definition of meaningful is. Obviously, we love the gift card business. It was up this year over last year in terms of our average store and in terms of total dollar. But I would say that the increase was very small. It was in your single digits.

Okay. Tokyo, and then I want to circle back to one for a second. Tokyo, we will not open this year. We're actively looking for locations at this point in Tokyo for Abercrombie & Fitch and Hollister. I will be there next week but we are still in the looking stage. That is a very, very slow market in terms of finding locations. To go back to the inventory flow for one, I just want to add this. Not only were we able to flow inventory in relation to demand, but I think those of you who were looking at the stores saw how we converted to spring in a time where we were plagued by warm weather pre-Christmas, we were in a spring mode as of Christmas eve, and more aggressively than we've ever been and that's a testimony to our ability to flow the right inventory. So, thank you for that question, Margaret.

Ladies and gentlemen, we ask for one question per person, please. We'll go next to Dana Telsey, Telsey Advisory Group.

Good afternoon, everyone.

Hi, Dana.

We didn't say that, that back guy said that, we're okay.

Okay. Just want to follow up. Given that you've now had experience launching many new concepts, with this Concept Five that you're launching, given what you've learned from other new concept launches. How will the launch of Concept Five be different than others? Whether it's in rate of expansion, whether its in location, things like that. And Mike, minimum wage impact, what impact do you see from that this year? And both Mikes, in terms of investment spending, where are you relative to where you would like to be, either in store staffing or store maintenance? Thank you.

Okay. Let me address Concept Five. I think we've learned a ton about opening new businesses and the first lesson is that we have not invested properly in the infrastructure of the business in terms of opening prior to opening. And we are doing that with Concept Five. We are building a really professional staff here, in the store organization, we are hitting the ground running with Concept Five and I would say if you looked at the Hollister and the RUEHL launches, we from my point of view we look like amateurs in hindsight. So, I think just the amount of planning, structure and investment in human talent is a big difference. And I would hope it's going to pay-off.

I'll take the part in terms of minimum wage. Pending no more legislation, I need to caveat this; we're taking a look at the impact of minimum wage to be spring seasons to be $5.7 million roughly around $6 million for the back half of the year, again, that's pending no new legislation. In terms of our investment spending, in terms of staffing, I am very, very happy with where we're at. In terms of staffing in our stores, again this is an ongoing thing in terms of optimizing our staffing in our stores. But I'm very happy with where we are at. In terms of maintenance for the stores, I think that we are in a good strategic position. We know where we are going with regards to maintaining our fleet. And I think that through Mike's focused efforts on this over the last year, this is on the forefront and it is no longer an afterthought. As we grow, it's even more and more important to make sure that our fleet is up to the standards that Mike has set. In terms of staffing, here at home office, I'll speak to the administrative side. I'll let Mike speak to the creative side of the business. But I think that we are adequately staff. Again as we grow, we are going to add some headcount. But I think we are going to be more efficient. And we are looking at areas to where we can actually cut back on the headcount due to efficiencies created by some technology. And when I say cut back, I mean, really reallocation of resources. And I'll let Mike speak to the creative headcount here at home office.

I think that our budgeted headcount is appropriate. We have design openings in the business, which when we fill those openings, I'm going to be very happy with where we are. We've made major investments in the creative aspect of our business over time. In design, actual design, also trend or what we would call the trend research, testing and focus groups. But I believe that we are currently budgeted to achieve, is the proper number.

Yeah. Let me just add to that, to just bring clarity to, I think the staffing in the past two years, a large portion of that was due to previous underinvestment, both in terms of administrative and the creative side of the business. On average, we added about 400 head count per year and that's going to drop by half in 2007. So, I think we feel much better where we are at and it's no longer, in a lot of cases paying for past underinvestment, albeit there is a little bit of that.

We'll go next to Barbara Wyckoff, Buckingham Research.

Hi, everyone.

Hi, Barbara.

Thanks for the insight into new initiatives and the tough process behind those initiatives. And I'd add my congratulations on the annual performance. I'll ask only one question. Can you talk about where Hollister operating margins came in versus the core A&F in 2006? And can you talk about where kids' is in sort of the scheme of things also?

I'll speak to that and Mike can add on to that. We've not really indicated our operating margin by brand. What we've indicated is that they are relatively consistent across the chain or in the family of brands. And we work for the same kind of model from merchandise point of view in terms of IMU markdown across the business. We look for parity and we achieve it. But thanks, Barbara.

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference. We appreciate your participation. You may disconnect.

Thank you.

Thank you.