Greetings, and welcome to the Arcturus Therapeutics’ Second Quarter 2020 Earnings Call. During the presentation, all participants will be in a listen-only mode. Afterwards we'll conduct a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] And as a reminder, this conference is being recorded, Monday, August 10, 2020. I'd now like to turn it over to Neda Safarzadeh, Head of Investor Relations, Public Relations and Marketing. Please go ahead.

Thank you, operator, and good afternoon, everyone. We are joined today by Joseph Payne, President and CEO; Andy Sassine, CFO; Dr. Pad Chivukula, CSO and COO; and Dr. Steve Hughes, our Chief Development Officer. Before we begin, I would like to remind everyone that except for statements of historical facts, the statements made by management and any responses to questions on this conference call constitute forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties for purposes of the Safe Harbor, provided by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Any statements other than the statements of historical facts included in this communication, including those regarding the IND application, the CTA approval, the strategy, future operations, the status of preclinical and clinical development programs, the planned initiation of clinical trials, the likelihood of success of the company’s coronavirus COVID-19 vaccine candidate or other product candidates and the company’s current and future cash and financial position, are forward-looking statements. Actual results and performance could differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statements as a result of many factors including, without limitation, an inability to develop and market product candidates, unexpected clinical results, and general market conditions that may prevent such achievements or performance. Such statements are based on management’s current expectations and involve risks and uncertainties, including those discussed under the heading Risk Factors in Arcturus’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 filed with the SEC on March 16, 2020 and in subsequent filings with or submission to the SEC. Except as otherwise required by law, we disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date they were made, whether as a result of new information, future events or circumstances, or otherwise. Now it is my pleasure to pass the call to Joe Payne, President and CEO. Joe, Please go ahead.

Hey. Thank you, Neda. Good afternoon to all, and thank you for joining Arcturus quarterly call today, which today also happens to be Andy Sassine, birthday, our CFO. So, wow, what a quarter today it's been. Arcturus has made a tremendous recent corporate progress, highlighted by the progress of two clinical programs ARCT-021 which is our COVID-19 STARR mRNA vaccine candidate and ARCT-810 our OTC deficiency program. The company has matured into a clinical stage company focused on the development of infectious disease vaccines and significant opportunities within liver and respiratory rare diseases. Our corporate progress is highlighted by the advancement of ARCT-021 and ARCT-810 into clinical studies. I'd like to provide an overview highlighting why we're so excited about each of these programs. I'll begin with ARCT-021, which is also known as LUNAR-COV19. Our COVID-19 vaccine utilizes Arcturus self-transcribing and replicating mRNA technology, which is trademarked as STARR, and the STARR mRNA is delivered with Arcturus lipid mediated delivery system called LUNAR, which is also a registered trademark. By combining these two technologies, we're developing an extraordinary potential vaccine product for this extraordinary pandemic with our partner Duke-NUS Medical School. And these technologies when combined and based on what we have seen in preclinical testing may provide an improved safety and efficacy profile in the clinic. This clinical candidate has the potential to be an effective and well-tolerated vaccine, with a highly differentiated profile characterized by a very low dose, and a potential single shot administration. We may observe a lowered incidence of ISRs or injected -- injection side reactions, due to the anticipated low dose of ARCT-021. And we may observe improved efficacy and durability of the vaccine, since we observed robust humoral and cellular immune responses in our preclinical studies, particularly with CD8 T cell induction. ARCT-021…

Thanks, Joe. Yeah, I was on mute. I'll start with ARCT-021, our vaccine candidates for COVID-19. Remind you, ARCT-021, we selected a self replicating mRNA that goes the full length on modified the spike protein. After a comprehensive evaluation of multiple candidates, expressing different modifications and different domains of the spike protein, in a preclinical screening process, as well as assessment of both conventional mRNA, and self replicating mRNA version. Our preclinical data has demonstrated both robust neutralizing antibody response and the cellular immune response with single administration at low doses. We would have seen 100% seroconversion with a single low 2 microgram dose in our animal studies and robust CD8 and CD4 plus response with a pH1 biopsy helper response. These data has enabled accelerated discussions with the Singapore Health Sciences Authority, allowing us to move rapidly into clinical studies. The ongoing Phase 1/2 study is being conducted in close collaboration with Duke-NUS Medical School in Singapore, studying it into two parts. In Phase 1 escalating doses will be administered in a single injection to younger adults aged 21 to 55 years old. And then there's a Phase 2 part with selected doses will be tested in a larger number of younger adults, as well as in older adults 21 to 55. The study has commenced screening and we anticipate dosing of subjects to commence there. We are looking forward to obtaining initial clinical data in a Q4 timeframe and with favorable data we plan to rapidly transition the initiation of late stage clinical trials. I’m now transitioning to discuss the ARCT-810 program. Our ongoing Phase 1 study is being conducted in 30 healthy volunteers in New Zealand. In this study we’re elevating five dose levels of ARCT-810. We’ve completed dosing of the first three cohorts, with no significant…

Thank you, Steve. And good afternoon everyone, I would like to thank our existing shareholders for their support and I would like to welcome all of our new institutional investors to this call. A number of highly new sophisticated biopharma investment funds became new shareholders in Arcturus, as part of our recent public offerings. On behalf of the management team and the Board, we are grateful for their investment and validation, which helped us raise approximately an additional $200 million last month. Without the support of our existing and new shareholders, we would not have been as successful with our raise. We have obtained a very strong and diversified shareholder base, through our recent public offerings, including our April offering. The combined capital raises of approximately $280 million will provide essential resources to enable the company to advance this pipeline and continue driving shareholder value. The press release issued earlier today; includes financial statements for the second quarter of fiscal year 2020, which I will briefly summarize. Arcturus’s primary source of revenues is currently from licensees and collaborative payments received from research and development arranging – arrangements with our pharmaceutical and biotech partners. For the second quarter of 2020, the company reported revenues of $2.3 million, compared with $10.2 million in the three months ended June 30, 2019. The primary reason for the decline in collaboration revenue, primarily, relates to a $3.1 million decrease in reimbursement from CureVac associated with the OTC collaboration that ended in the second quarter of 2019. Additionally in the 2019 quarter we recorded a one-time sub license revenue of $3.1 million related to our synthetic genomic signature. Total operating expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2020 worth $12.4 million, compared with $10.7 million for the same period of 2019. The current quarter operating…

Sure. Thanks, Andy. It's definitely been a remarkable period of progress for Arcturus. And before we just proceed with Q&A, I think we got some feedback that during Steve's portion of the call that it was difficult for him to hear. So we've been asked by a few investors, if he could reread the script that he just went through. So if it's okay, Steve, if you can give it a second, hopefully the connection will be a little bit clearer this time. All right, Steve, and then we'll proceed with Q&A thereafter.

Okay. No problem. Thanks. Can you hear me better this time?

Yes. Great. Thank you.

Okay. Yes, unplugged my headphones and put some different ones in, so apologies for just now. So I'll start again. So, starting with the 021 program, our vaccine for COVID-19 with ARCT-021 we selected a self-replicating mRNA that encodes the full-length unmodified spike protein after a comprehensive evaluation of multiple candidates expressing different modifications and different domains and spike protein in a preclinical screening process, as well as an assessment of both conventional messenger RNA and self-replicating messenger RNA versions. Our preclinical data has demonstrated both robust neutralizing antibody responses and the cellular immune response with a single administration at low doses. We’ve 100% seroconversion with a single low to microgram dose in our animal studies, and our robust CD8+ and CD4+ response for the Th1 biased T-helper response. These data have enabled accelerated discussions with the Singapore Health Sciences authority, allowing us to move rapidly into clinical studies. The ongoing Phase 1/2 study is being conducted in close collaboration with Duke-NUS Medical School in Singapore. The study includes two parts. In Phase 1, escalating doses will be administered as a single injection to younger adults aged 21 to 55 years old. In the Phase 2 part, selected doses will be tested and a larger number of younger adults as well as an older adult cohort greater than 55 years of age. The study has commenced screening and we anticipate dosing of subjects imminently. We are looking forward to obtaining initial clinical data in Q3 or early Q4. This favorable data, we plan to transition rapidly to initiation of our late stage clinical trials. I’ll now transition to discuss ARCT-810. In the ongoing Phase 1 study, we're enrolling 30 healthy volunteers in New Zealand. In this study, we're evaluating five dose levels of ARCT-810. We have completed dosing of the…

Well, it's fine to come back to me. This is Joe. Thanks Steve, and clearly we have exciting milestones ahead in clinical data readouts anticipated later this year. We look forward to continuing to provide you with updates on our progress. And operator, I think now is an appropriate time to open the call for questions.

Certainly. [Operator Instructions] The first question is from Seamus Fernandez from Guggenheim. Please go ahead.

Great. Thanks for -- thank you for taking the questions, and also thank you for repeating the script. Joe, I guess, for my perspective, if you could just -- can you help us understand a little bit a couple of things. Number one, I think the prospect of having a single dose is something that is particularly attractive, and would be helpful to just talk a little bit about how your construct could actually achieve that? And then separately, can you just help us understand a little bit better -- you said that timing will be eminent for dosing. Just hoping to get a little bit of a sense of some brackets around that, it's eminent this week? And then, finally, can you just give us a general sense of when we see the data, how many patients worth of data should we anticipate seeing, is that towards the end of the third quarter and the beginning – or beginning of the fourth quarter, I think, is what you guys said. So can you just clarify a little bit of, what you would hope to incorporate into a press release or an announcement? And then I had one last question that I'll follow up with.

Sure. Hey, Seamus, thanks for joining the call and for the questions. With respect to the word imminent, I actually looked it up prior to the call today in the dictionary and it said very-comma-very-soon. So what does very-comma-very-soon mean? I use the vernacular the next few days. But just stay tuned. It's very soon. And we -- so it's imminent by the true definition of the word with respect to dosing. With respect to timing of the data, what we're messaging is that, weighty data will be provided in Q4. And you heard the language on the call today by Steve and the team that there may be some preliminary data in Q3, but the substantial data will be Q4. With respect to addressing why this is a potentially a first shot, I do have Pad with me, but I'll begin to address that question. Our vaccine contains two technologies, a self replicating mRNA technology, and a delivery system called LUNAR. If the self replicating mRNA kinetics expresses the COVID-19 or the full link spike protein over a period of two to three weeks, so that extended duration of expression has shown in our preclinical data set that neutralizing antibodies continue to increase for 60 days. You just do not see that data in any other vaccine, especially with our experience internally with conventional messenger RNA vaccines. So that extended durability or duration of action may remove the requirement for a second shot, because the kinetics continues to proceed. With respect to the delivery technology, how that delivery technology has been optimized for delivery to dendritic cells may play a role as well. But I'll leave it at that.

And just as a follow up question. I know that that you guys are just entering the safety study. Can you just give us a little bit of a structure for the trial, the dose escalation and then where your preclinical studies would predict enough expression to really drive a robust immune response? I know we're seeing very low levels in your preclinical studies, but just wanted to get a little bit of -- if you could provide any color in that regard, with regard to kind of what you would characterize as or think is likely to be the effective dose?

With respect to what's the effective dose, I can comment that the initial dose will be a single microgram or 1 microgram dose to initiate the study, but I'll -- Steve is on the call. I'll let him address the remainder of your question.

Thanks, Joe. Yes, I'll take that. Starting with a 1 microgram dose and then we're dose escalating from there. The highest dose that we're testing is actually still lower than all of the other messenger RNA vaccines that they have chosen for their Phase 3 dose. So we're escalating within the low single and low double-digit microgram range are still very, very low doses. As previously stated on, I think the last earnings call, we're anticipating the therapeutic effects going to be somewhere in the 1-to-10 microgram range. And – and that's a dose that we're hoping to take forward into subsequent clinical trials. But up until, we've tested the dose range and seen the responses in human's stands and it's difficult to comment further than that. Does that answer your question?

Perfect. Thank you. Yeah. No, that's great. I'll jump back in the queue. Thanks.

Thanks Seamus.

The next question is from the line of Madhu Kumar with Baird and Company. Please go ahead.

Hey, everyone. Thanks for taking our questions, so starting out with ARCT-021. To what extent is a single dose robust versus the idea of doing a prime plus booster, but having a better safety profile than the existing messenger RNA vaccine, like how do you think about those two possibilities and kind of those likelihood of one versus another and kind of potential for your vaccine for one person another?

Well, based on that – yeah, thanks for the question, Madhu. It's appreciated. This is Joe. I think it's important to realize that both of these scenarios that you highlighted could happen, right? But based upon the preclinical data that we've collected, the likelihood of each of them is reasonable. What we've seen pre-clinically is that, a single administration was sufficient, and that's what every single bit of data we've collected is suggested. But if for whatever reason, there's subpopulations that do not respond, either as expected or due to some sort of immune suppression and some sort of subpopulation. We want to be prepared to have a shot plus booster for those individuals as well, whether it's the elderly or people with comorbidities, etcetera. So we are collecting, a single administration data and two shot administration in the clinic. But ultimately, which one are we focusing on, I think both would be fantastic scenarios. We'd be happy with either. But the single administration, at least we have to give that our best shot, no pun intended because that would be very differentiating to all the other vaccines.

Okay. Joe I don't believe that – I believe the pun was intended. But secondly, based on the data sets, we have out there, what do you think is a good most antibody like humoral clinical profile and T-cell clinical profiles for a single shot? Like, what is the profile you would need to see to be like yeah, this single shot works for us?

Right. Well you're seeing and I would fully expect additional vaccines as they enter the clinics that we're going to see a humoral antibody response and this is what you've been seeing to-date. But what we're not seeing from vaccines in the clinic is a strong cellular immunity response, especially with respect to CD8 induction. So focusing on humoral immunity, how we're different there is we've shown pre-clinically that our neutralizing antibody titers continue to increase over 60 days, that's different. So does that mean that, we'll see the same thing in humans? We hope so, but we've got to prove that. It – does it mean that will ultimately have higher neutralizing antibody titers than other vaccines out there, it sure could be and we've got to prove that out as well. But what is even more differentiating is the, the robust T-cell response, the CD8 response that we saw in our preclinical animal, models and studies there. Because that is something we haven't seen to-date with other vaccines and if we see that, that means that a higher percentage of people will respond to these vaccines, so our efficacy rates go up and it will also mean that the durability of the vaccine or the duration of the protection will extend as well. So, that will be something that will be very interesting to learn as early as we can in this early clinical trial is that CD8 induction data. In addition to the, the growing and increasing neutralizing antibody data or the humoral immune response.

Okay, great. And then a question for Steve, so thinking of the OTC program. So, you haven't seen any ISRs, you haven't seen any need for steroids so far in healthy volunteers. Is there any reason to think that patients with OTC deficiency are the urea cycle disorders, could have a different profile in terms of infusion reactions that they need per steroid regimen therapy as compared to healthy volunteers such that there might be a difference that would require steroids in the course of treatment?

Thanks. That's a great question. No, there's no reason at all to believe that the patient population is going to react in a different way. From the point of view of their immune system or to the infusion. We're confident that the data we're seeing and healthy volunteers in terms of the safety and tolerability of the drug will translate directly to the patient population.

Okay. And then from the healthy volunteers study, what kind of PK or PD assessments are being done? You mentioned in the patient study that you're looking at urea cycle all that kind of stuff. What is being done into healthy volunteers -- was there any data from that that you feel could be interesting to you to kind of help give people a sense of how 810 is working, ahead of data from the point of interest of Phase 1b and OTC patients?

Yes. Again, I like your question. The in-house volunteer population, obviously, a lot of the factors -- all of the factors, relating to the urea cycle are normal. So, several of the biomarkers such as urinary orotic acid etcetera, ammonia levels just aren't applicable, they're not they're not going to change in a healthy volunteer because they're tightly regulated and in a cycle except people neglect it. We are looking at your Genesis, as we said previously; this is a single post study. It would be great if we did see something moving that would be incredibly informative and we're hopeful that we do see something move. But in our animal studies what we saw was that the biomarker data improved with successive dosing, over, over four five doses administered. And so even if we don't see anything in the healthy volunteer study that doesn't ring any alarm bells or anything. And similarly, in patient populations, we're going to expect biomarkers in the multiple dose study to move more substantially and in a single dose study. So it's quite possible that in single dose studies that we just don't see enough of a bump to achieve statistical significance on the biomarkers. Was that answer--

But there's no like PK readout that you think would be meaningful from the tele volunteer study in terms of just how good exposure you're getting kind of over time.

So, we do have CK readouts from a healthy volunteer phase study in both plasma and urine while testing CK. I'm not sure about anything is in the CK is going to give us a really good idea of what the protein expression is like. So we're trying to get a handle on that with some of the biomarkers. But that particular biomarker is one that we're working with our vendors to actually develop on let’s say, to give it enough sensitivity to be able to detect changes in the normal person. That's the critical constraints for the healthy volunteers, everything's normal, so trying to see changes in a kindly regulated system in a normal person is challenging. But as yet, we don't have the biomarker data back. That's taking a little bit longer than the safety data to come out. So, we'll have to provide you with an update on that at a later call, I think.

Okay, excellent. Thanks so much, everyone.

Thanks, Madhu.

The next question is from the line of Wangzhi Li with Ladenburg. Please go ahead.

Hi. Thanks for taking my question. And I think Happy Birthday to Andy. My first question is about the COVID-19 vaccine ARCT-021, I think is another new name. Whether the data I think that you expect it is a fourth quarter this year, just to clarify should this week to expect the dose escalation data or where also included a dose expansion data.

Hey, Wangzhi. Yeah, so there is definitely a dose escalation phase in this Phase 1/2 study that will then transition to a dose expansion phase, and we encourage everyone on the call to look at ClinicalTrials.gov as we updated periodically. So, with respect -- I guess to rephrase your question, you're just trying to tease out when the data is going to come out, correct Wangzhi?

Just wonder, because you mentioned that we got data in the fourth quarter. Just clarify is that just the dose escalation data or will be post-dose escalation and dose expansion cohort data?

Well, in terms of timing of the data, we are escalating the dose starting from 1 microgram. And if one of the early doses is very responsive that would improve our timeline into sharing that data. But if we simply want to complete the study and then share a more hearty fulsome data package, then there'll be multiple dose levels evaluated and people can not only see the efficacy, but the dose response, et cetera. So, right now what we're messaging is Q4, in general, for a substantial data set to be shared. But of course, there's always a scenario where the early doses are exceptional and of material value, and we'd have to share those earlier. But, but just for conservative messaging, Q4 is what we expect for sharing the data package.

Got it. And the follow-up on that is, when do you compare both the single dose and versus a double dose, is it for the beginner as a dose escalation or is more at the dose expansion cohort?

Well, we -- and Steve can feel free to fill in any gaps here, Steve, but we are working under the guidance of the Health Sciences Authority. They've been wonderfully collaborative, and they've allowed us considerable flexibility – much more flexibility than you would see normally. And what do I mean by flexibility is in terms of dose levels, and you know, modifying those at the same time. So – but Steve do you have anything else to add?

Yes, I want to say is that the – the dose escalation is entirely single dose. So as we move into the Phase 2 part of the study that's where we about to valuate some two dose cohorts as well. So, we're planning to not repeat all of the same doses in the Phase 2 part as economical in terms of time or subject, and better plan is to escalate few doses into the expansion cohort to evaluate those in a greater number of subjects than in more detail.

Got it. Helpful. Now there are high levels – the Singapore because you didn't draw – trial Singapore – and Singapore is pivotal trial. Where are you going to conduct them, just the Singapore or – even include other countries? And also what's the regulatory path requirement for you to get approval in other countries, for example, Israel or additional countries, if you do the few other trial in those countries?

Okay. Go ahead, Steve.

So maybe if I take the question in reverse order, and thanks for asking. In terms of regulatory part -- let’s talk by then in all countries on very, very -- on point in time. If you ignore laster in China, I guess, where there's been some recent announcements we don't really -- we're not really clear on what those regulatory approvals were based on. But in the countries that we are considering the regulatory pathway involves conducting a appropriately sized clinical trials to demonstrate prevention of COVID-19 disease and that's the same in all jurisdictions. The difference with Israel and Singapore and some other regulators, is that some of them will look favorably and give you a more rapid path to approval, if you already have approval in, for example, Canada or the United States or in Europe. So they have a particular regulatory mechanism that allows for approval -- it gives you a quicker approval process. In terms of our late stage development, our Phase 3 clinical trial will be conducted in multiple different geographies and multiple different jurisdictions. And those will be selective, primarily closer to the time at which we initiate because it requires using countries and areas where there's a substantial presence of COVID-19, so that we can enroll the study quickly and get the number of events required within a reasonable timeframe to get to a fast registration. Does that answer your question?

Yeah, that's very helpful. Thank you. And then maybe lastly on the ARCT-810 – OTC program. Just curious for the PKA you mentioned earlier what do you – exactly look at for the PKAs the components of the lipid or messenger RNA cell in the blood, what do you look at for the PKA?

The – well, the PKA – measurement in the vaccine – so vaccine is given at --– our vaccine is given at such a low dose that there's not really a lot of point in measuring -- in pre-COVID, which is systemic exposures, which we know is going to be extremely low, as compared to OTC program. So in the OTC program we're measuring it because…

Sorry, I mean, for the OTC program.

Okay. So yeah for the OTC program, we measure both the ionizable lipid or certainly ionizable lipid, that's part of the nanoparticle and we also measure messenger RNA in acid in the urine although, it's not really possible to measure the messenger RNA in urine. So we’re measuring the lipid.

Got it. And my last question is with the OTC program. When do you expect to start repeat dosing?

That's going to be sometime next year, we would anticipate, just because we need to collect the results from the healthy volunteer study, select some doses. And then go to the regulators with the clinical trial protocol, so as we previously said the our guidance…

Got it. Thanks for taking my questions.

Thanks, Wangzhi.

And as a reminder, there's only about 10 minutes left for the conference today. And the next question is from Steve Seedhouse from Raymond James. Please go ahead.

Hi, this is Ryan Deschner on for Steve.

Hi, Ryan.

My question is the self-replicating RNA, an higher hurdle from a regulatory standpoint, safety database size or length, what’s relative to conventional RNA and also we'd be benchmarking neutralizing data to a complex in sera panel, in the Phase 1 studies in Singapore?

A good question, I'll adjust the first one. The self-replicating messenger RNA and concept has been known since actually the 90s. Some of the older generations of this technology has been evaluated in the clinic and is very familiar with a different approach, using like a viral vector for example. But so the agencies that we've talked with are very familiar with self-replicating mRNA, ours is just an improved or next generation. So with respect to the second component of your question, Steve maybe you can address that.

Yeah, sure. Could you just remind me again what the second component was? Hello?

Yeah. I was wondering if the benchmarking neutralizing antibody data come with sera panel in the Phase 1 studies in Singapore.

Yeah. So as we have published studies, we would intend to do the same thing, so that our dataset is interpretable alongside the others. Yes, that is our intention.

Okay. Thank you very much, and then one last question. I wanted to take on the safety event thing across these Phase 1 mRNA studies in terms of fever, which wasn't seen in, no protein based vaccine. And also either in biotech sort of better safety for their second vaccine candidate going into Phase 3, do you think it's possible to modulate mRNA based vaccines to reduce safety events? And how would you love doing this.

Well. I can initially respond to that question with respect to expectations around safety. We believe that a substantially improved safety profile will be related directly to the amount of RNA and the amount of lipids that are injected; in other words, the dose level. And because the self-replicating mRNA technology combined with LUNAR has shown to be efficacious at very low doses. If we can repeat that in human clinical trials, then the dose level would be much lower which means the lipid burden and the RNA burden would be lower, and the undesired immune responses to those entities, would be far less likely because the dose is much less. With respect to other aspects of the vaccine, I remind people that our vaccine is devoid of adjuvants and devoid of viruses and viral vectors as well. So, we have much less to be concerned about with respect to tracking over long periods of time and in a clinical trial.

Thank you very much.

Okay. Thanks Ryan.

The next question is from line of Mayank Mamtani with B. Riley Securities. Please go ahead.

Good afternoon, Joe and team. This is Justin Zelin on for Mayank. Congrats on all the progress here and thanks for taking the questions. I had two quick questions on 021. First, could you speak to publication plans for any preclinical data on 021's potential to generate sterilizing immunity, or reduced file transmission? And secondly, could you provide any color on the Israeli Ministry of Health agreement in terms of the range of doses supplied and what the implications are for discussions with other ex-U.S. countries? Thanks.

Okay. First of all, with respect to our cadence of data sharing and how we're going to share that data with respect to publications. We can look to what other companies have done with their other vaccines. We may share data initially in form of a press release and then subsequent to that in a peer reviewed press release, we are collecting additional preclinical data in parallel with our human clinical trials here in Singapore. So, we definitely intend to share this data in a cadence that you've seen with other companies do. With respect to the Minister of Health or Israeli Ministry of Health, we just had a great experience with them, they had -- after we signed the binding term sheet with the Country of Israel, they had a press conference where they clearly communicated to their citizens that the Arcturus deal is a significant one. And a key part of their vaccination strategy that can potentially address a large portions of their population. So, that's how they communicated it and so I'm just reiterating their talking points from their press conference, but we also view it the same that it's a significant deal that it can be very considerable. And any other questions?

That's great, Joe I appreciate the color here and congrats once again on the progress. Thanks very much.

Thanks.

We're out of time for today. I'll turn it over to Joe Payne for any closing comments.

Hey, just thanks everyone for listening. Looks at this point, we're going to close the call. Feel free to reach out as always if you have any follow-up questions and we will respond efficiently. Bye for now.

That does conclude the conference call for today. We thank you for your participation and you can now disconnect your lines.