Good morning everyone and welcome to the Aris Mining Q2 2024 Operational and Financial Results Call. We'll begin with an overview for management followed by a question-and-answer session period. [Operator Instructions]. Please note that the accompanying presentation that management will refer to during today's call can be found in the events and presentation section of Aris Mining's website and arismining.com. Also, Aris Mining's second quarter 2024 financials have been filled on SEDAR + and EDGAR and can also be found on their website. I would now like to turn the conference over to Mr. Neil Woodyer, Chief Executive Officer. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Operator, and good morning to everybody and thank you for joining us on our 2024 Q2 earnings call. With me today in Bogota are Richard Thomas, our COO, and Richard Orazietti, our CFO. But before we go into the quarterly results, I'd like to draw your attention to Slide 2, which shows our quarterly statements, as we will be making several forward-looking statements today. With that out of the way, and starting on Slide 3, I'd like to share our operational and financial highlights with you before handing it over to Richard Thomas, who will discuss our operational performance and give us an update on our transitional growth projects at Segovia and Marmato. Then Richard Orazietti will discuss our financial performance this quarter and for the first half year. Aris Mining produced 49,000 ounces of gold in Q2 and 99,983 ounces in H1. We generated a half-year adjusted EBITDA of 64.5 million and our adjusted earnings were 18.1 million or $0.12 a share. Segovia generated a significant all-in sustaining margin of 60.6 million in H1, contributing to our funding of our expansion projects. During H1, we invested 70 million in growth projects, including 7.5 million allocated to exploration programs. As highlighted in our news release on Monday, our drilling program at Segovia continues to deliver high-grade intersections, confirming the continuity and extensions of the large-scale veins at depth and along strike and supporting Segovia's status as one of the highest-grade gold operations in the world. Without going into too much detail, as this will be covered by Richard, I'd like to briefly touch on the expansion of our Segovia operations and the construction of the Marmato lower mine. Both projects remain on track and we continue to expect to achieve an annual gold production rate of approximately half a million ounces in the second half of 2026. And again, before I hand over to Richard, I'd like to spend a minute just to discuss Soto Norte. On June 28th, we completed the acquisition of an additional 31% in Soto Norte, therefore increasing our project ownership to 51%, with Mubadala retaining a 49% interest, and they became a 9.3% shareholder of Aris Mining. We continue to develop the development team and integrate it into our management structure and procedures. We're also progressing the new Soto Norte development plan study to look into our next project growth for 2027, beyond the feasibility study levels around the way, with the results of these studies expected in early 2025. I'd also like to take the opportunity to emphasize that local contract mining partners will be integrated into the new Soto Norte design and development plan. With that, I'd like to hand over to Richard to carry on the discussion.

Thanks Neil. Moving on to Slide number four. In the first half of 2024, we processed relatively low-grade material at Segovia, averaging at 9.2 grams per ton, and we did experience an unplanned seven-day plant maintenance shutdown in April, which affected our H1 production for the year. However, since May, the Segovia plant has been operating at its design capacity of 2,000 tons per day, and is on track for expansion to 3,000 tons per day by early 2025, to support our future production growth. Despite these operational challenges in the first half of the year, Aris Mining remains on track to meet the low end of its full year production guidance of 220,000 to 240,000 ounces. And what gives us confidence is this, that we have opened up some very high-grade sections in the El Silencio mine, which we identified in our drilling program, and we are currently exploiting these. We are seeing this grade reporting to the world at present. Also, we have managed to upgrade our Bolivia shaft, and that production has been increased by 25%, which allows us increased production from the El Silencio mine. Moving on to Slide number five, where we provide further details of the cost structure of our Segovia operations, and our contract mine partners' business model. In quarter two, 2024, the cash cost per ounce is $1,222 per ounce for mine operations, and $1,174 per ounce for untitled CMP operations. Cash costs for owner mining remained relatively stable, with a modest 3% increase compared to quarter one, 2024. However, the cash costs for untitled CMPs rose by 11% of the previous quarter, directly driven by a 12% increase in realized gold prices, to $2,308 per ounce in Q2. Similarly, the purchase and processing costs per ounce for material delivered by third-party…

Thank you, Richard. We're now looking at Slade 8, and the second quarter of 2024, we generated revenue of $114.2 million and $219.4 million in the first half of the year. Our quarter-over-quarter revenue growth was driven by a rise in gold prices, as our average realized gold price increased by 12% to $2,308 per ounce in Q2 compared to $2,061 per ounce in first quarter. Consequently, adjusted EBITDA increased by 27% quarter-over-quarter to $36.1 million, and in the first half, we generated adjusted EBITDA of $64.5 million. The bottom line here is that our profitable operations continue contributing to fund our transformational near-term growth that Neil and Richard had mentioned previously. Now moving to Slide 9, I'd like to discuss some of the key line items of our management view of our cash flow statement. As Richard had mentioned, the market price of gold directly impacts the price of mill feed purchase from the CMP segment of the Segovia operations. Consequently, higher gold prices also contributed to higher cash costs in the second quarter of 2024. Despite higher cash costs, our ASIC margin of $30.6 million on a consolidated level increased by 22% in the second quarter compared to the first quarter. In the first half of the year, we generated an ASIC margin of $55.6 million. During the first half of the year, we invested $70 million in growth projects and reduced our indebtedness by $21 million. Debt reduction was achieved through the maturity of convertible debentures in April of this year, with the majority of the CAD 18 million converted into shares. And then we had a payment, a $7.4 million repayment of the Gold Linked notes. Working capital outflows related to VAT receivable of $17.4 million incurred in the first half of the year are expected…

Thank you, Richard, and now we move to Slide 11. Before opening the Q&A session, I'd like to re-emphasize the key takeaways that we reported in this second quarter. Despite the operational challenges in the first half, Aris Mining remains on track to meet the lower end of our full year gold production guidance of 220,000 to 240,000 ounces as our production profile is waiting towards the second half. Our profitable operations contribute to funding our transformational near-term growth. Segovia is generating a significant ASIC margin of 60.6 million in H1. We're executing our transformational expansion project as planned and targeting an annual production rate of approximately 500,000 ounces of gold in the second half of 2026. Our joint program, Segovia, continues to deliver high-grade interceptions, confirming the continuity and extension of the last scale veins at depth and along track, supporting Segovia's status as one of the highest-grade gold operations in the world. We're progressing the development of our study plans for the 51% on Soto Norte to unlock our next growth project for 2027 and beyond. With that, I'd ask the operator to open the Q&A session.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions]. The first question comes from Carey MacRury with Canaccord Genuity. Please go ahead.

First on Segovia, you did 9.2 grams in the first half. You've mentioned you're back into higher grades. We're halfway through Q3. I'm just wondering what sort of grades we should be expecting in Q3 and maybe into Q4.

It goes from 9.3 up to 9.8. Towards the end of the year, we're looking at 10.2 grams a ton.

9.8 for Q3, roughly?

Yes.

Yes. Okay/ Then on Marmato, I think your original guidance was to spend something like 140 million. It looks like maybe you're tracking a bit behind on the spending. How do we think about capital spending at Marmato in the second half of the year?

Okay. Up until now, we've been doing a lot of ground preparation, earthworks, so the big expenditures haven't come in yet. But as we ramp up in the second half of this year, we're buying a lot of our milling equipment. We are commencing the D-time development as of probably very close to this month, so the expenditures will begin to ramp up in the second half of this year.

Do you have a sense of how much we should budget for the second half in terms of capital?

I would have to get some better information and get that back to you.

Okay. Maybe just last question on Marmato, just what the key focus items in the project plan are for the second half of the year?

The main one is beginning the portal D-time development, so that kicks off, as I said, within the next month. Beginning of civil works and earthworks for the plant and beginning to start paying off the equipment for the milling and doing quite substantial work on non-processing infrastructure in terms of camps, laboratories, et cetera.

Maybe one last one, if I can slip it in. Just on the grade at Segovia, from your partners, obviously a big step up in grade. Do you have any visibility into that, or is that -- you just kind of get what you get from them?

We have some visibility of it, and we are increasing our contract mine partner, how can is say, assistance or support infrastructure to be able to help planning and ventilation, rock mechanics, and geology to assist them and to assist us to be able to be planning our future production.

The next question comes from Don DeMarco with National Bank Financial. Please go ahead.

Just a couple of questions focusing on Marmato. Well, we saw at Segovia that there was the guidance increase in cost, and inflationary pressures were cited. Are you seeing any potential inflationary pressures with respect to Marmato development?

We had just reviewed our capital about a month ago. We reviewed our capital. A lot of our costs had been tied into the equipment. We understand those very well. They had been locked in, and a lot of prepayments had been made for the deposits, so we're pretty confident on the equipment for the mill. The process infrastructure, we've got good quotes on that, and the development, we understand that very well. That, of course, will be reliant on the ground conditions we meet, but so far we're pretty confident of the $280 million to date.

Okay, thanks. Of the $250 million or so remaining, how much of that is locked into fixed-price contracts?

At the moment, the [indiscernible] is definitely locked in, and the plant is definitely locked in, so that's 30 plus 70, but about 100 of that is definitely locked in.

[Operator Instructions] The next question comes from Kerry Smith with Haywood Security. Please go ahead.

Richard, so you're saying about $100 million of the $280 million to CapEx is a firm number now, so what the other $180 million is for which construction activities? Does that relate to you?

On non-process infrastructure like camps, most of the roads, water treatment plants?

Okay. And so the $100 million is basically the turn-deep lines in the mill then?

Yes.

Okay. Got you. Okay, great. Then you said Marmato is 22% complete now on the construction. Is that roughly where you expect it to be? Are you on schedule with your timeline?

We are slightly ahead on the portal development, so we expect it to be, yes.

Okay. And just going back to Cary's question about the CapEx, you had originally talked about 140 million to 150 million budgeted for 2024 CapEx spend for the lower mine. Is that still the number that you expect to hit for the year then?

Yes. As I said, we're beginning the development. A lot of the mining equipment is going forward, so we should be there or thereabouts by the end of the year, yes. A lot of the ramp-up in expenditure happens in the second half.

Okay, okay. And the contractors aren't having any issues so far getting manpower to the site and having people available to get this work done, are they?

No. Many of the contractors are local Colombians, and therefore the labor pool is quite big and we haven't had any issues so far.

Okay, okay. And then just one last question. The original CapEx for the mill expansion at Segovia was $11 million. You said it's now going to be $15 million. That $4 million, was that all scope changes or is any of that sort of cost escalation versus the original budget?

It was scope changes. The area where the expansion is located is on a laterite area. We expected our foundations for much of the equipment to be about nine meters deep. However, when we got down to nine meters, we didn't find bedrock. We had to go down a further 10 meters, and that increase in those foundations is accounting for the extra $4 million.

Okay. So it's just the civils associated with getting down to $4 million.

The civils associated with the plant expansion, correct.

I would like to turn the conference back over to Mr. Woodyer for any closing remarks.

Well, thank you everybody for joining us today. We really appreciate your interest, and please don't hesitate to reach out to us, to Oliver or Katrina or any of the rest of us, as appropriate. Many thanks, everybody. Thank you.

This concludes today's conference call. You may disconnect your lines. Thank you for participating, and have a pleasant day.