Good morning, and welcome to Aramark’s Fourth Quarter and Full Year Fiscal 2023 Earnings Results Conference Call. My name is Kevin, and I'll be your operator for today's call. [Operator Instructions] At this time, I would like to inform you that this conference is being recorded for rebroadcast and that all participants are in a listen only mode. We will open the conference call for questions after the conclusion of the company's remarks. I will now turn the call over to Felise Kissell, Senior Vice President, Investor Relations and Corporate Development. Ms. Kissell, please proceed.

Thank you, and welcome to Aramark's Earnings Conference Call and Webcast. This morning, we will be hearing from our CEO, John Zillmer; as well as our CFO, Tom Ondrof. There are accompanying slides for this call that may be viewed through the webcast and are also available on the IR website for easy access. Our notice regarding forward looking statements is included in our press release. During this call, we will be making comments that are forward looking. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied as a result of various risks, uncertainties and important factors, including those discussed in the Risk Factors, MD&A and other sections of our annual report on Form 10-K and SEC filings. We also will be discussing certain non-GAAP financial measures. A reconciliation of these items to U S GAAP can be found in our press release and IR website. With that, I will now turn the call over to John.

Thank you, Felise, and thanks, everyone, for joining us. This morning, Tom and I will provide a detailed review of our fourth quarter and full year fiscal '23 results and key performance drivers, including net new business. Our growth teams continued to deliver including significant new business wins closed in just the past few weeks, which I will review shortly. I'm proud of the work we've done to strengthen performance and culture and I'm eager to capitalize on the numerous opportunities our client focused approach continues to generate. We'll also preview our performance expectations for the year ahead, which show positive momentum entering this new era for Aramark following the completion of the Uniform Services spin-off. We will take a moment to highlight the results for Uniforms at a high level and Kim and Rick will provide more detail in their upcoming earnings call for Vestis, now an independent publicly traded company. Aramark's performance this past fiscal year demonstrated the progress we've made towards the strategy and financial goals outlined at Analyst Day nearly two years ago, resulting in a stronger balance sheet, improved profit margin performance and meaningful sustainable growth. Over the past year, organic revenue grew nearly 16% and adjusted operating income increased 34% on a constant currency basis. Free cash flow was $334 million that included a payment of deferred payroll taxes related to the CARES Act as well as transaction and restructuring costs associated with the spin-off. Free cash flow before these items was $471 million which along with higher EBITDA and over $800 million of net debt reduction throughout the year resulted in a 1.4x leverage ratio improvement from the prior year to 3.9x at year end. Adjusted EPS increased 50% on a constant currency basis compared to prior year. As part of these results,…

Thanks, John, and good morning, everyone. Fiscal '23 represented another significant step towards delivering our strategic and financial goals. As John just reviewed, our reestablished hospitality driven customer focused culture has resulted in the third consecutive year of strong net new business performance, which helped drive a 16% increase in full year organic revenue compared to prior year. Adjusted operating income grew at more than twice the rate of organic revenue resulting in significant AOI margin improvement over last year and we continue to meaningfully delever through focused cash management and strategic asset optimization, which when combined with AOI growth led to a 50% year-over-year increase in adjusted EPS on a constant currency basis. We also completed a major milestone with the Uniform Services spin-off that we believe will drive enhanced performance and value creation as each independent business executes on its own distinct strategic vision. As we move past this exciting inflection point for Aramark, my commentary today will be focused on the Global Food and Facilities business in fiscal '24 and beyond. The fundamentals of the business remain unchanged. We expect to deliver profitable growth and margin through Scale. Revenue performance will continue to be led by net new business, appropriate pricing actions, and expanding our base business. AOI growth, which is favorably positioned for outsized increases in the near term, we believe, will be driven primarily by five factors. First, the profitability ramp of new business as a result of operational maturity and efficiencies, following three consecutive years of adding new clients. Next, the recovery of the price inflation lag and expected benefits from recent trends related to the slowing of inflation. As John mentioned, we made particular progress here in our Education Sector and Corrections Business that benefited the fourth quarter. And assuming continued moderation of…

Thank you. Thank you, Tom. I'm extremely proud of the milestones we accomplished this past year as a global team and I'm excited about the positive momentum we've generated for the year ahead. Our strong performance is driven by our commitment to our strategic priorities, which we believe have established the groundwork for more opportunities and success to come, both in the near term and long into the future. With the spin off now complete, fiscal ‘24 represents a new chapter in the company's history. We're confident in our ability to build upon what we've worked hard to establish leveraging the hospitality culture and growth mindset now firmly rooted within the organization. Operator, we'll now open the call for questions.

Thank you. We'll now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions]. Our first question comes from Harry Martin with Bernstein. Your line is open.

Hi, I am [Indiscernible]. Good morning. I thought I'd ask one on the guidance, please. The Q4 EBIT number, I calculate as being 3% ahead of 2019, it looks like the 15% to 20% AOI growth into next year can be hit assuming a pretty similar 3% ahead of 2019 number for the - the rest of the quarters to come in 2024. So I just wondered how conservatively you feel like that guidance has been set and what the moving parts are there? And then just a more strategic question you mentioned on the supply chain and the benefits that can have on the margin from compliance scale and new deals. I wonder if I could get a little bit more detail to help quantify that. What is the purchasing volume of the GPO today? What percentage of that is in food items versus the other hospitality items of procurement? And then what proportion of the sites today are in compliance? And how much do you expect that to drive an improvement going forward? Thanks very much.

John, you want to start with supply chain?

Sure, I'll start with supply chain. First of all, compliance is just statistically measure across the Contract Food Service Business. So those statistics are reviewed with each operating business every month. They have a goal in terms of their overall compliance and are working very hard to achieve those numbers. There is always opportunity in the last year that - that was significant because of the disruption that occurred in supply chain over the course of the last couple of years. So our compliance numbers are very, very close to optimal. We continue to push and to get units to purchase the right products from the right suppliers. So there is always opportunity to improve upon that, but in general I'd say we're very close on the compliance numbers. The GPO spend today, I don't think that we disclosed with the total GPO spenders.

Yeah. It's - it's about $16 billion.

Yes about $16 billion which includes, both our - our Contract Food Service revenues as well as the spend that we manage for our clients through Avendra and the other GPOs we operate. So, we have - we have significant scale and we work very aggressively to utilize that total spend to benefit both our clients as well as Aramark as we continue to manage new deals with suppliers and manufacturers and that supply chain team is very expert at optimizing for all of those contingencies. So we're very comfortable with the potential growth for the GPOs. We have significant opportunities to grow both domestically and internationally in the GPO market and we see continued supply chain economics improvement as a result of that focused growth of that in that area.

Yes, and Harry, I think on the margin question, as a conservative and if you play it off against either ‘22 or - or ‘19, and I'm not sure how relevant ‘19 is anymore, given the spin and - and different economic dynamics versus five years - five years ago now. But we're very thoughtful about what we're trying to accomplish here in building this sustainable model. We all know what chasing margin does, and it doesn't end well. So we're continuing to move the business forward in a thoughtful way, trying to balance retention, new business growth, our client needs. We're very happy with the progression of the margin off the low of 1.2% in '21, like I said improved it by 350 basis points so far. We'll continue to progress and we still feel, as I said, very comfortable and confident in the goals that we set out with some adjustments for timing. We'll continue to push through that. If there's an opportunity to move it faster, which will probably be driven off a stronger easing of inflation over the next few quarters and - and couple years, we'll do that or - or we'll have that opportunity. If it goes the other way, it'll be a bit of a headwind. So overall we feel good about the number. I don't know if it's conservative or not, but we'll continue to do what's right for the business.

And I would just add final commentary to that is that we're off to a good start in the quarter. We see continued improvement in the slow moderation of inflation that's our expectation built into the model and built into the plan. And if inflation continues to ease more rapidly then certainly we'll be able to - we're well positioned to take advantage of that. As we discussed in our commentary, we've made significant progress on the price recovery in those - in those businesses that were lagging. We saw that in the fourth quarter and we continue to see that play out in the first quarter in early days. So - so we're confident in the targets and as Tom said, we have a commitment to the goals that we established at Investor Day. We see ourselves reaching those goals and getting through them and doing even better in the long term.

Thank you.

Our next question comes from Neil Tyler with Redburn Atlantic. Your line is open.

Thank you. Good morning, John, Tom. Actually, I think I'll start by following up on Harry's question about the margin and your comments there. So the guidance suggests, if I'm calculating correctly, that the basis point improvement will be a little bit better than your typical operating leverage, but not significantly. And so I wanted to ask with the comments you just made in mind, to what extent you're sort of reinvesting in the business in order to maintain growth, just really in operating costs? That's the first question. And second part of that I suppose is, I don't know whether you look at the business this way, but can you compare gross margin or in unit margin on business won versus business lost over the last say 24 months. I'm trying to get a sort of taste for any structural change in the profitability of the – of the business that's coming in? Thank you.

Yes, I mean the margin is business won is always lower than business loss. So that churn is where we're getting up to the cruising speed that John referred to is the headwind we've talked about for the last couple of years. But as we - as we consistently build that - that COG, it levels out over time and that's where we'll get to here over fiscal ‘24 and fiscal ‘25. The normal model in my mind, this is a 6, 9, 12 model, and I said that to some folks before, in a normal space of 6% top line, 9% bottom, 12% EPS, probably be a bit outsized for us on EPS because of the - as we delever. That yields probably a 20 basis point margin improvement in the normal course of things. We expect to double maybe triple that over the quarter if you take the guidance this year. So it is quite outsourced - are outsized and I think that that has the opportunity that for fiscal ’24 and ‘25 and - and even into ‘26. And obviously they hit the goals as everybody's doing the math, that's what we have to do, but we feel confident in that. So I think it is the next couple of years is quite outsized AOI growth, margin growth compared to the normal model, which would probably be around 20 bps.

Thank you. Sorry, I wasn't - I wasn’t particularly clear in the first part of the question, Tom. I apologize as I meant - I really meant that whether they were sort of contracts you were deliberately sort of leaving behind that were suboptimal in terms of their profitability. So I wasn't thinking actually sort of on day one necessarily and not switch but when you look at each – each of those portions at their cruising speed, whether there's much difference in the profitability of the bits that you've - you've lost versus gained?

No. I don't think so. I mean not - not ultimately to your point, I mean, a Merlin, is gonna provide a good strong margin for us over time once - once we get it fully implement or up to speed and operational. But no, I don't - I don't know how you feel, John. But I - I don't see any business that we've been booking that has any different margin profile than we have in the past.

Yeah, no and one of the things the mantra inside the organization is profitable growth. So it's not growth at all costs. It's growth that is margin accretive and earnings accretive, and that is what the organization is focused on. So if you look at the portfolio of business that we've sold over the last three years and this consistent ramp up to growth, it's all met our pro form a targets and our performance expectations for returns on invested capital and the other metrics we utilize to evaluate the new accounts as we sell them. So no, there hasn't been a structural change in our expectation and there hasn't been a structural change in the value of the business we've sold relative to the business that we've lost over that period of time. So I'm highly confident the growth engine as designed will stimulate this margin recovery that everybody is so anxious for us to achieve. And we believe in it and we see it happening in the business. I think if you relate – yes I think as we get through the balance of this year, we'll see continued strong performance, continued strong growth leading to that margin recovery, and hitting the expectations we've set for 2025 and 2026.

Understood. Great, thank you very much.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Ian Zaffino with Oppenheimer. Your line is open.

Hi, great. Thank you very much. Impressive results here. I know you guys indicated kind of that U shape, but can you maybe give us a little bit of color on how October is going and some trends you can maybe point to kind of what gives you confidence in the guidance? Thanks.

Yes, I would say we were very pleased with the results in October, one month is not a year make, but we are very pleased with the results. Excuse me. As you know, we - our units report to us on a weekly basis, we see the results as they come in. As we indicated we've seen improved performance in the price recovery area particularly in Corrections and Higher Education that bodes very well for the balance of the year in terms of that earnings improvement, so October - also we had some significant new business wins some of which we've just talked about Boston Children's and many others that we're still working to get to final contract. So we're very pleased with the early stages of this fiscal '24 as we are - as we're through the first five or six weeks.

Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Andrew Steinerman with JPMorgan. Your line is open.

Hi. This is Alex Hess on for Andrew Steinerman. Just wanted to ask on net new - FSS net new inclusive of Merlin appears to be down 18% year-on-year in 2023. Is that a fair characterization? And then how should we think about the puts and takes around net new, maybe verticals where you're seeing traction, maybe verticals also where you're seeing share loss? And then, I'll follow-up with a question on margins as well.

Yes. Well, we're not seeing any verticals with share loss, so that's an easy question to answer. I think we're seeing growth across all the businesses and had net new pretty much across the board. Yes, there are some years that are bigger than others based on the size of the whales that we might sell in any given year like Merlin, last year being such a significant component of that, but this last year represented our third best historical performance for growth - for net new growth. So, we're very pleased with the results. And one of the things that people have to remember is that while we measure it in fiscal year terms and report on it on that basis, sales activity is driven by the client's decision dates. And so many of the decisions that leaked into 2024, for example, were decisions that we would have expected potentially in actually in 23%. So we don't see the change from year-to-year as the performance drop off. We just see it as a kind of a lag in decision making around some of those large customers and large clients, some of which are very significant in size. So, again our third best performance ever last year in terms of net new and again contributing to that three-year history or three-year track record of net new growth, which is quite frankly a significant change from the history of the company. So, we're very pleased with it.

Got it, John. Thank you so much. And then on margins, if I interpret this right - your FSS sort of pro forma margins were up something in the range of 80 basis points to 90 basis points in 2023. Your guide seems to imply something closer to 40 basis points this year and then that would have to sort of pick up perhaps a little to hit the now fiscal ‘26 target of at least 5.9%. Is that a fair framing? And then is there anything sort of in this year that is specifically compressing that optical margin?

Yes. I think that yes, the margin this year was - was a little over 90 approach 100 bps improvement. We still had a little bit of tailwind in - in COVID, particularly within the B&I world this year, so that helped drive that outsized performance.

Yes, again the margin is something that is a result, not a cause for us. We continue to focus on driving the AOI dollars, retaining our clients, reinvesting in the business and so it's a balance of all that as we move forward. I'll say it again, we're confident in being able to achieve the financial goals, into ‘25 and ‘26 as we just laid out. So I don't know what else to really say, except for we are feeling confident about that and continuing to balance and do the right thing for the business when it comes to driving profitability and as a result the margin.

Yes, I'll just add the final commentary on that. It's - we are optimizing for growth retention and earnings improvement as a result of all the growth that we're achieving and so we're - we are focused on the margin. We get it. We understand that the marketplace will reward us for improving margins over time, but we think the best way to consistently deliver margin expansion is to grow the business and achieve that margin through scale and so we're optimizing to achieve those objectives over a period of time and I'm not worried about 10 bps this year versus 20 bps next year. I'm more worried about achieving that sustainable growth model and maintaining it, and continuing to deliver for our customers’ day in and day out. And the margin is an outcome of that strategy. It's not the strategy. So we're - we're confident. We believe in the goals and we have the team in place to go ahead and deliver on it. And if we get lucky and inflation wanes more rapidly then you will see that translate into improved margin performance over time as well. And just very hard to predict where we are today as you probably saw CPI was unchanged in the announcement this morning, but CPI does not reflect the inflation rate that we project for food product around the world, which is closer to 5% or 6%. And our teams look at food inflation by business unit, by market basket, by product category, it's a very detailed analytic that we have to evaluate it. And so we take that into our assumptions and if we have been conservative I think ultimately that plays well to our advantage as we continue to negotiate new terms, new agreements with our suppliers and with our customers.

Thank you, Tom. Thank you, John.

Our next question comes from Heather Balsky with BOA. Your line is open.

Hi, good morning. Thank you for taking my question. So to start, I was hoping you could talk about the cash flow statement, now that you have spun off Vestis, just what your free cash flow profile looks like, perhaps maybe help us shape what conversion looks like and any cadence around the cash flow quarter-to-quarter?

Yes, the cadence shouldn't change much at all because the Global FSS Business was really the driver of that seasonality. So you'll again see a big outflow in Q1, big inflow in Q4 as you have seen in the past. Uniform's cash flow was fairly consistent quarter-to-quarter throughout the year. So you'll see the same cadence, just slightly lower numbers. In terms of conversion rate, we're probably looking at about a 40% AOI conversion, as we settle out through this year and it'll really stand up as a Food & Facilities only business, that probably is - is going to be the best benchmark. We've got a couple of things this year that are of note on free cash flow. So we do have some hangover transaction costs that we talked about from the spin that we're paying in the first quarter roughly $35 million to $40 million. And then we do have the taxes on AIM Service, the sale that we'll pay in the first quarter as well about the same amount. I think overall that - that you - again, you'll see the same cadence about a 40% AOI conversion as a target, bit less than that this year given these - those to one of items that I talked about.

Got it, that's helpful. And then, as a follow-up question with regards to less a margin question, but more an operating question, over the last two years you've had to make adjustments with menu and your labor force and operations to help offset what we're seeing with regard to inflation. As food costs inflation waves, it's still there. How are you thinking about menu and operations? Can you unwind some of that? Or do you think this is sticky and you're kind of happy where you are today?

No, I think our - I think our operators have done a great job of adjusting menu and service offerings to meet - to meet the inflation issue head on and I think we're largely through it. And so now, we're really at a place where I think we have kind of a new normalized operating model and a new normalized menu structure, we don't see the need for additional changes there. And I think the product supply issues that were prevalent over the course of the last couple of years have all essentially been normalized and so our people are really able to go ahead and structure the programs the way customers want them. So I think we're very comfortable in today's environment and we do believe that over time we're getting back to a much more consistently normalized environment with respect to inflationary cost pressures both for food and labor, as labor availability has improved as well.

Thank you very much.

Our next question comes from Andrew Wittmann with Baird. Your line is open.

Oh great. Thanks for taking my questions guys. I guess I heard a couple of things in your remarks that are margin drivers. You talked about the maturing of all the new business that you sold recently in particular and that - that indicates to me like if you're selling new business all the time, there should always be some new business that needs to mature. So if it's going to give you a margin benefit, it might suggest that maybe your focus is more going to be on delivering the profit margin targets that you've set out here rather than maybe as aggressively growing the top line. Obviously, you always want to do both, but I guess, John, philosophically to hit the margin targets, do you have to pivot a little bit more to lean into the margin, the operational performance to deliver the above normal gains here over the next two or three years?

Really no, we see growth as a path to margin expansion and that growing consistently over time leads to both AOI improvement in terms of a dollar - in terms of dollars and in terms of margin. And it comes from a couple of different sources handy is the - in both the growth in terms of the profitability from the new accounts that are added, which does scale up over time as well as the improved economics on supply chain spends. So as we add new business it provides additional spend for supply chain to manage to craft better deals with suppliers and manufacturers which leads to improved economics for everybody. So as you know, in the supply chain world you get paid for growth. And so we might get X number of dollars per case, if we're buying at a certain level and we get X plus if we're buying more. So the growth feeds the supply chain economics and then it also creates additional leverage with respect to overhead because we don't need to add significantly above unit costs when - as we're growing the business. We're able to grow the overheads at a rate that's much slower than the growth rate of the company. So - so by maintaining that consistent growth profile over time, we deliver the margin expansion that we all - that we all seek, to shut the growth down or to focus more on margin as opposed to growth would actually be counterproductive and that's frankly what the company did back in the mid teens, back in the earlier days post IPO. The company went on a margin march and stopped growing and that's what led us to the point where we needed to make a significant strategic change. So we see growth as the optimal strategy and we can consistently deliver margin expansion through that growth. And - but we're also focused on managing the middle of the P&L. We want our people to get better and better every day at managing food costs, labor costs and direct expenses. So we give them tools and technology to go ahead and manage the middle of the P&L more and more effectively as well. So as inflation moderates, managing that middle of the P&L gets easier as well. So it's not just about pricing, it's about managing that cost structure at the same time. So but we think growth is the primary driver and will continue to be the strategy of the company.

Great. And then just one quickly here for Tom. I just looked at the share count. It looks like you guys are estimating a 270 million share outstanding number here for fiscal ‘24. In the quarter you just reported you're at 263 that was up about a million shares, about 3 million to 4 million shares year-over-year. It seems like the number of share increase is unusually high this year, is there a lot of shares vesting here that were - that were coming here to vest in the first quarter or something or what's driving the somewhat larger share count creep?

Yes, two components to that. One, there's - there’s roughly usually about 3 million of normal dilution as we go year-to-year. And then secondly you've got the sort of rebasing of - of the remain co-employee share options and restricted shares from the spin. So, because of the math in essence of the spin it's about a $7 million total, $4 million related to spin and $3 million just as normal - more normal dilution.

Okay. That makes sense. Thank you.

Sure.

Our next question comes from Toni Kaplan with Morgan Stanley. Your line is open.

Thanks very much. I wanted to talk about new business. It's been very strong for the past couple of years now. I just wanted to ask if you could sort of compare and you alluded to it a little bit in the first question asked previously, but just could you talk about the sales force a little bit more if you compare the number of sales people you have now versus when you started, has that gone up meaningfully? Has it been just increases in productivity that has been, accelerating this new business, as it been the technology or the decentralization? Just anything that sort of talks to the sustainability of this accelerated new business going forward?

Sure. It's actually all of those things. First of all, as you may remember as we joined the company, we went ahead and made significant investments in sales infrastructure in a couple of different ways. First by adding sales resources to the streets and that level has been now constant probably for the last three or four years. We made the initial investment as we joined the company. We made some changes in sales, leadership, and we down streamed the sales function back to the business unit. So it's now sitting in the geography closest to the customers and that way it's much closer to where the job needs to get done. And so we invested in those resources back three years ago and the level of reinvestment we've made over time has been essentially de minimis, sales manager here or sales person there dependent upon business unit strategy. So there hasn't been a quantum change since our initial reinvestment in that business. So what you've seen over the last three years has been enhanced productivity and increasing sales volume for each sales manager based on their time and territory, based on their time back in the business which was really our strategy to begin with. We wanted people to be working in the lines of business, in the territories that they were responsible for and that led to significant ramp up of their productivity. So, we don't see the need for continued reinvestment. We think we're at a steady state in terms of the number of resources that we have. We're always - we’re always looking to optimize and we may add a person here or there depending on the total opportunity set, but in general we feel like we're in very good shape from a sales structure perspective. Tom, I don't know if you have anything you want to add to that.

Yes. No, I think the only thing I'd add is that time and territory is so important and that just we'll continue to build strength in the sales force as they work their - their pipeline in a territory for multiple years in a row because as we've talked about a lot, how low to contract in this - in our business can vary anywhere from a few months to many years. And so our stability in the workforce which is still three years young in terms of this close to over 40% increase from fiscal ‘19 and before is still getting their sea legs and still developing that stability in their market. So I think it will close rates and productivity will continue to improve.

Great and international had a very strong quarter of growth again. Wanted to ask if there was anything that really has been driving the improvement there and how you see that going into 2024 with regard to sustainability of growth in international?

Yes, I would say yes they had another terrific year in terms of net new growth consistently across all geographies and I think that is driven in large part by the stability that Tom just described. The international sales organization was largely intact and in place before we rejoined the company. So that organization has been more stable and they've been working those territories more consistently over a longer period of time. So I think that - that's worked to their advantage. I think it's also very helpful that we have a very disciplined and focused strategy with respect to growth in those geographies where we really want to be and so we're consistently focused on those markets and consistently focused on those businesses. And we're not - we’re not out planting flags in new countries. We're really focused on those geographies where we have the right to win and a competitive advantage and that's translated into continued performance improvement. So yes, we feel very good about the international team and their productivity and we've been the beneficiary of significant stability in those markets.

Perfect. Thank you.

Our next question comes from Shlomo Rosenbaum with Stifel. Your line is open.

Hi, good morning. Thank you for taking my questions. My first question, I just want to talk - ask you a little bit more detail on the pricing catch up in education and correction space. Is - is the effort that you made over the last couple of quarters in terms of the contract renewals, is that really going to fully catch us up to the inflationary pressures that you saw or is there any further efforts that are going to be needed next year? And then I have a follow-up on that for junk part of the business.

Yes, I think we're going to be - I think we're very close to being caught up in both of those businesses. We'll continue to work to improve in pricing across the enterprise, not just those businesses as we continue to see the need for price recovery and as inflation continues to be somewhat persistent on the food side. So we're going to be very diligent about making sure that we continue an elevated pricing strategy to recover those costs going forward, and - but I think we're in very good shape particularly compared to where we were last year when inflation was running 10% to 12% in those businesses and we were not able to price for it. So I'd say we're largely caught up and we'll continue to work to improve across the enterprise and get even better.

Okay, great. Thank you. And then just a follow-up, you mentioned in passing the strategic positioning the mix of hospitality, I know there's been no changes in the marketplace for that business since you bought it. Maybe you could talk to us a little bit about the strategic repositioning and whether you think that business can get back to kind of the strong growth rates it had before you bought it?

Yes, we think first of all the addressable market is very significant and we have work through developing kind of a new additional service model to what next level was initially providing, so we're expanding the range of services and the capabilities and focusing really on the Senior Living business as well, which is multiple billions of dollars in terms of addressable market and opportunity largely self op. And so we think that represents a very significant growth potential. There is still growth potential in the core business that next level operated and was doing so well at. So we'll continue to look at both sides of the business, both Senior Living as well as Skilled Nursing, and we'll bring a balanced approach to growing that part of the business.

Thank you.

Our next question comes from Josh Chan with UBS. Your line is open.

Hi. Good morning, John, Tom. I - I guess you mentioned food clear. Could you talk to the shape of food inflation that you expect through the year? What's baked into guidance? And how does that kind of shape through the year?

Yes. We've baked an assumption of approximately 5% to 6% of food inflation globally, now it's different by market. It's 5.5% in the U.S. for the overall inflation rate for our expectations it's a little less in Canada, a little higher in Europe, and a little lower in Asia. So we do it on a blended basis based on the size of the organization, call it somewhere in the range of 5% to 6%, and that's what's - that’s what built into our assumptions and built into our planning models for the year and built into our negotiation discussions with our clients and customers. And, so that is based very specifically on individual market baskets by product for instance. We expect meat to be up 5.9% in 2024. We expect fruits and vegetables to be 7.1%. So we have - and then kitchen supplies down at 1%, right? So we've got a very detailed market basket of products by business unit that we buy and that we monitor for our locations on a monthly basis. So that's the overall assumption. And if inflation continues to moderate and we see a lowering of those expectations, we'll keep the street informed as to what we're seeing and when - and as to how we see it affecting our balance of the year.

Okay. That's - that's really helpful color. Appreciate that, John. And then I guess circling back on the on the, normalized margin improvement that Tom mentioned earlier. It is definitely understandable that this year will be an outsized year of improvement because of the price inflation catch up. I guess, how do you think about 25 being outsized years because items such as contract maturity, supply chain, they seem to be relatively normal course, so - so how should we think about margin improvement beyond this year?

Yes, I think, Tom will jump in here as well, but I think you'll see continued margin improvement and an outsized performance in ‘24, ‘25, and ‘26. As we continue to see the - the normalization of these phenomenon that you've just described. New business maturity we will have ramped the business for ‘24 and ‘25 or in this business sold over the course of the last couple of years. The price recovery lag or price inflation lag will be largely done in ‘24. We'll continue to see drivers of outsized margin performance in supply chain throughout the cycle. So we'll continue to get better in ‘24, ‘25 and ‘26 as we add scale and improve supply chain economics. We expect SG&A over that time period also be managed at below growth rates in the business. So - so they're all drivers to outsize margin performance and we see that model playing out consistently. Tom, do you?

Yes. No, same thing - I think all five of those factors play into ‘24 and create the outsized AOI growth, many - most of those still play into ‘25, maybe the new business hitting that cruising speed sort of drops off as a factor into ‘26. We've included this in the slide, so it is our overall view of how these things play out over the midterm, but we're getting down to the core where growth begets supply chain leverage, which begets overhead leverage, and we continue to manage the middle of the page as we move into that sort of 20 bps long term sustainable model but over the next two to three years, it's going to be more than that.

Okay. That's great color and thanks for the time guys.

Thank you. Our next question comes from sorry - our last question comes from Stephanie Moore with Jefferies. Your line is open.

Hi, good morning. Thank you.

Morning.

Good morning.

Just wanted to touch on the guidance outlook for fiscal ‘24. It's a pretty tight range, but I was just curious as you look at both ends of the range whether you pick AOI growth or EPS growth. Maybe you could talk about some of the factors that would contribute to hitting either - either kind of assumptions around the macro, inflation, pricing, etc. Just to provide some guardrails there? Thank you.

Yes. I think it's the same components we just talked about, with inflation being sort of the big factor. I think the sharper it would decline and become a non factor I think that creates upside. If it ticks back up over the levels John just ran through, I think that becomes a little bit of a headwind. Again, we talk about huge increases in new wins, we've got good progression baked into the plan and we expect that there was a lot of oversized wins, that's a bit of a headwind if unfortunately which we don't want at all. We underperformed on new business that would probably be a margin help. So, you can go down each of the lines and sort of work through a plus and minus scenario on each, I think with inflation being the overarching theme in there as to what may help us, over achieve or present a bit of a headwind.

Yes, I would - I would second that I think if there is one key driver that I would call out as being a potential risk or benefit to the range, it would be that inflation number and the expectations around it. And I think we're all very hopeful based on what we see in the marketplace today and based on the actions that the team has taken in terms of pricing recovery. We're very hopeful that - that will lead to improvement so that we can be trending towards the upper end of the ranges, too early to make that call and but that would be the one key driver I would focus on. I think all the rest of them whether its new business maturity, SG&A, supply chain, those I think we're going to be very consistently delivered against those objectives. And so that would be the one variable I would - I would be most focused on.

Got it. I appreciate the time. Thank you.

Thank you.

I'll now turn the call back to Mr. Zillmer for any closing remarks.

Perfect. Well, thank you very much everybody. Really appreciate the time and attention this morning and the support of the company. As we've said we are very confident in the performance. We're very pleased with the year end and very confident in our performance for ‘4 and in the expectations that we've set for ‘25 and ‘26 as well. We are committed to this strategy. We're going to grow this business and deliver improved earnings and improved margins over time. And we're here to deliver on the commitments we've made not only to our shareholders, but to ourselves as well. So we're all the big believers in this strategy and big believers in this company and we're going to go deliver. So thank you very much.

Thank you for participating. [Operator Closing Remarks]