Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. I am Mark Francois, Senior Director of Investor Relations of Alphatec Spine. Thank you for joining us today for Alphatec Spine’s conference call to discuss our first quarter 2012 financial and operating results. Speaking today will be Alphatec’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Les Cross; Dirk Kuyper, President, Global Commercial Operations; and Mike O'Neill, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Also on this call is Ebun Garner, our General Counsel. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder this conference call is begin recoded today, May 8, 2012, and a replay of the event will be available later today on our website and will remain there for the next 30 days. Before I turn the call over to Les I must remind you that today's conference call contains forward-looking statements made under the safe-harbor provision of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements relate to the company's operational initiatives, sales and marketing strategies, projections for 2012 sales, operating margins, adjusted EBITDA growth, net earnings and economic and commercial market conditions. These forward-looking statements are based on the company's expectations and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties and assumptions that could cause the actual results to materially differ from those from the forward-looking statements. The company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Many of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions are discussed in our 2011 annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, which we filed on March 5, 2011 with the Securities and Exchange Commission. As well as other filings on Form 10-Q and periodic filings on Form 8-K. Our SEC documents are readily available on our website at alphatecspine.com. And with that I will turn the call over to Les.

Great. Thank you, Mark. Good day everyone and welcome to Alphatec Spine’s first quarter 2012 conference call. This afternoon I will provide highlights of our operating performance from the first quarter of 2012. I will then turn the call over to Dirk for a review of our commercial operations. Mike will follow Dirk and review our financial performance and guidance for the remainder of 2012. I will them come back on the call with some closing comments and open the call up for questions. Before we begin our discussion, I wanted to share with you very exciting news that developed today and that we announced today. And this news will help us push the company forward with our growth initiatives. With our organization alignment nearly complete and Dirk focusing on the company's commercial operations to drive revenue growth and with me focused on driving global operations excellence with respect to new products, margin improvement and managing our cost structure, we are better positioned to capitalize on the sales opportunities while driving our 2012 operating improvement goal. So with that said, today we filed a Form 8-K announcing that we have entered into an equity line of credit financing arrangement with Eclipse Advisors, LLC. Pursuant to our agreement with Eclipse, Eclipse has committed to purchase up to $25 million of our common stock over the next 2 years. This stock will come from our existing shelf registration already in place and we expect to be able to close on our initial round of financing in the near future. We anticipate that the proceeds will provide substantial benefit to Alphatec Spine as we unleash the value of the company. Our balance sheet will be strengthened to support our core business needs. The funds will supplement our organic cash flow enabling us to…

Thank you, Les. The spine market continues to face challenges. In the U.S. we see continuing pressure on pricing in the low single-digits and procedural pressures related to a decrease in payer approvals for lower lumbar surgeries. We are beginning to see the signs of the U.S. market stabilizing and hope that this trend continues as we move through 2012. In Europe and the Middle East, economic and political turmoil continued to negatively impact healthcare and our business in particular. Compared to the first quarter 2011 consolidated first quarter 2012 revenue was down about $1.3 million or about 2.5%. We would like to point out that the first quarter of 2011 was a particularly strong quarter for Alphatec Spine and therefore represents a difficult year-over-year comparison period. While the first quarter revenue results were not as high as expected there are certain bright spots that I would like to highlight. Further, we are in the midst of several initiatives in the U.S. that we believe will have an impact on revenue going forward and I will mention these briefly. Similar to the revenue impact of new products, we expect these initiatives to contribute in the back half of 2012 and beyond. Now turning to our U.S. sales. For the first quarter of 2012 we reported U.S. sales of $32.6 million. U.S. sales include our direct business in hospitals and our stocking distributor business. In our U.S. hospital channel, our primary domestic business, sales were even with the first quarter of 2011 in spite of market pressures. Excluding our Xenon pedicle screw system which was not available for sale during the first quarter, U.S. hospital sales grew about 3% over the first quarter of 2011 and about 1% sequentially from the fourth quarter last year. U.S. hospital sales were driven by…

Thank you, Dirk. The following remarks are related to our reported operating performance for the quarter ended March 31, 2012. With the close of the first quarter 2012, we are no longer using pro forma comparisons. The press release issued today provides our geographic sales segment performance on a GAAP basis only. Les and Dirk already covered U.S. and international sales for the first quarter so I won't repeat those numbers. I will however echo Les’s comments that overall we are pleased with our improved operating performance. We are laying a solid foundation on which to build out 2012 and future business performance. As we announced on January 5, 2012, the company reached a global settlement agreement with Cross Medical Products regarding a license agreement dispute initiated by Cross Medical and a patent infringement dispute initiated by us. As part of this settlement we agreed to pay Cross Medical $18 million, and we made an initial payment of $5 million in January 2012. In addition to the initial payment, we will make 13 payments of $1 million per quarter thereafter, starting in August 2012. From a P&L perspective, the company has expenses $9.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2011 which was charged to operating expenses as a legal settlement adjustment. Of the remaining $8.2 million, $8 million will recorded as a licensed intangible asset to be amortized over the next 7 quarters beginning with Q1 2012, plus associated interest of $200,000. A non-cash charge of approximately $1 million per quarter of intangible asset amortization will be reflected in cost of goods sold. However, these amounts will be added back as part of our adjusted EBITDA calculation. Gross profit for Q1 2012 was $31.8 million or 65.7% of revenue compared to $32 million or 64.3% of revenue in Q1 2011.…

Good job, thank you, Mike. The transformation of Alphatec Spine continues to progress. We are off to a good start in 2012. We do acknowledge that market headwinds continue to work against the industry, but we have made significant progress realigning our management structure that will allow us to continue to grow our business in spite of these market conditions. At the same time we will be driving forward on operational excellence initiatives to improve our gross profit. We will focus internally on our operational initiatives to drive innovation and ensure a continuous flow of new products. We will expand our global footprint. We will reduce our manufacturing cost, right size our operating expense structure to drive improved profitability and cash flow. Additionally, we are very pleased to have the opportunity to raise cash to help us get our new products to the market faster and allow us to be opportunistic in a market that is likely to experience consolidation. I would like to thank all of Alphatec Spine’s stakeholders, especially our employees and selling partners, who are persevering to make Alphatec Spine a stronger company. Together we are excited to unleash the value of Alphatec Spine for all stakeholders while delivering a world-class experience to our customers as we move forward. Thank you. And I would now like to open the call up for questions.

[Operator Instructions] Our first question is from Raj Denhoy of Jefferies.

Wonder if I could ask you a bit about the guidance. Particularly on the revenue side, you guys are pointing to a reacceleration or an acceleration in growth I should say in the back half of the year. And I am curious what you point to that gives you confident you are going to see the results improve?

Raj, this is Dirk. A couple of things. One, as we mentioned in the prepared remarks, Xenon came back on to the market in April. And although it will take a little time to regain the revenue that we had we do see that as a positive contributor. We also -- some of the initiatives we are taking, we are refocusing our sales team, our management team on driving incremental revenue within our current base whereas over the last couple of years they had really been more focused on growing the distributor network versus increased penetration within the network that we already have. So we think those things will contribute. We do have some new products launching in the back half. PureGen continues to do well. And we expect to get Solus, Alphatec Solus back on the market towards the end of the year.

The other piece I would add there, Raj, is Trestle Luxe is proving itself to be a very important product for us. And we are accelerating the expansion and we believe that’s going to be able to drive some incremental revenue. So I think rather than the big one time new products we are looking at continuing to introduce new products from within the range to keep the portfolio as fresh as we can. So I think the Q1 was obviously more challenging than we expected but we are still comfortable that we have line of sight to the revenue numbers that confirm guidance.

Does that any of that confidence imply any sort of improvements in the market backdrop?

No, not really. As I mentioned we do see the market beginning to stabilize. But we are not -- we have not modeled in any improvement.

We are still seeing -- we are still modeling pricing deterioration as we articulated at the end of the year.

Okay. And I guess, Japan I suppose is a fairly good market for you. I guess the price cuts have now kicked off, I guess, April 1. How does that factor into your view of the year, at least the balance of the year?

We had planned that in. Obviously this happens every 2 years in Japan so it was modeled into our planning for the year. We knew it was coming. We continue to grow very nicely in Japan and expect to continue to do well. Obviously, this takes a little bit of wind out of the sales but we are continuing to take market share there. We believe we are #4 in the market today.

Okay. And just one last question, just on the profitability. I guess you were pretty clear that the gross margin expansion we saw in the quarter was more of a geographic phenomena than anything structural was taking place. But you have also outlined a lot of initiatives that are underway here in order to improve the profitability. I guess I am trying to gauge sort of the timing of when we can start to see some of the benefits of the initiatives you have outlined on the cost side?

Yes, I think Raj what we saw in Q1 although was somewhat masked by the regional mix. And what we articulated when we came out at the end of the year with our margin guidance is, we are anticipating sequential expansion of our gross margin as we go through the year. We are not banking on suddenly the fourth quarter being miraculously good compared to the rest. So we did see operational improvements in Q1 in both the U.S. and in France. They were masked by some of the regional impacts in the inventory step-up which were greater. But we would expect to continue to see expansion of our margin as the year progresses quarter by quarter. And we are comfortable that our gross margin in mid-50s, and if we build from there throughout the remainder of the year. Sorry, mid-60s, my apologies.

Okay. And just then -- sorry, one last one just on the equity line of credit you established today. My sense is from how you described it, that’s really more provide you some flexibility should you need it. I believe you are probably sticking to your commentary about having cash sufficient both in the company and then also your cash generation to sort of satisfy what you need. And that additional $25 million really just gives you some flexibility to do additional things. Is that the way we should think about it?

Yes, I think we are not moving off our stated position. We believe the underlying business has the ability to generate sufficient cash flow to support the business as well as the Biomet settlement. I think what we are doing here is we are providing ourselves air cover in the event that we need it in terms of expanding the business. It’s a capital intense business and we need to front load some of that capital to get the return. But we also, as Les articulated, we want to be in a position to potentially take advantage of some of the dislocation that’s occurring. It’s not necessarily the number one objective but it’s certainly out there as part of the overall plan.

And my sense in reading those documents, you ask them for the money and they basically have 30 days to give it to you. Is that the way it works?

Mechanically it’s a put notice, yes. But at this point I don’t really want to get into the overall mechanics of it. But it is a put notice and it’s an obligation to purchase.

Over a 30 days window, if I read that correct?

Yes, that’s correct.

Next question is from Bill Plovanic of Canaccord.

So just on, leverage of the last question, so you put it to them and then they -- reading through this -- they can either take it all down or only half of it down if it’s a certain price or do they put it to you?

No, we put -- we issue a put notice and there is a 15-day window where they are obligated to purchase 50% of the put. And there is a second 15-day window where they are obligated to take the second 50% at a predetermined calculated discount.

But you don’t have to do the whole $25 million in that any put notice?

The -- any put notice is our sole discretion to issue.

So, you pick the dollar amount?

We pick the -- there is a calculation that determines the cap on the dollar amount, but we pick the dollar amount.

Okay. That’s actually more helpful. And it’s a straight equity at a discount, is there warrants or anything else attached?

No, there is no warrants. It’s a straight deal.

Okay.

The agreement is actually online.

Okay. No, I was reading the 8-K. My next question just is with, you talked about the stocking business that you had. I think a while back we talked about the impact of PODs and how much that was contributing to your overall business. If I remember correctly it was 10% to 15% of revenues. I was wondering if you could tell us today, kind of generally what percent of your business is PODs?

Bill, this is Dirk. It was never 10%. It was always substantially less than 10%. So just to clear that up. And it actually, I would say, is on the decline not the increase today. So it remains very comfortably below any level of materiality which to us would be 10%.

And just to look at some of the terminology you used. I think it was your -- the stocking, I take it the stocking would be the POD business for the most part?

No. No, we have a number of stocking distributors in the U.S. that have no affiliation with surgeons.

But we do classify them as within our total stocking distributive business.

Okay. So just for clarity. The U.S. POD is less than 10% of the U.S. business, significantly less or substantially less, to use your words, and it’s on the downside.

Yes.

Okay. And at this point would the loss of that business be material to your overall -- if that business went away, which we have some stuff gone in New Hampshire. And I think it’s 378 or 387 for the workers comp in California. Would that be material to your adjusted EBITDA projections or your loss projections for the year?

I think to the extent that we say that the revenue contribution is not material then overall the business isn’t material in totality. I mean I don’t want to split hairs in terms of the profitability of some of these businesses but obviously our margin to those businesses is substantially lower than our margin in our regular direct hospital business.

Right. Okay. And then with Solus, with the product being pulled off the market due to the instrument redesign again, would we expect another write-off of that instrument inventory again as we saw last time?

No. If you remember the first time we had built a large number of sets in anticipation of the launch and we actually made some changes to the implant. That’s what caused that write-off. This time we did a beta launch with a much smaller number of sets to validate that we in fact had solved the problem which in fact we're continuing to see. So there is no write-off of any substance of involved in this. I should point out that this problem that we are having is not dissimilar from the problem that every other standalone ALIF device has in the market with these types of patients. And we are hopeful that we can overcome it as opposed to doing what some of the other companies have done which has put warnings and contraindications in their IFU.

Okay. And then last question, I will jump back in the queue. A lot of commentary around gross margins in kind of the geographic contribution and what have you. Is there a potential given that revenues were slightly below in the U.S. that you will be running your facilities at a lower run rate and therefore we would see gross margins come down just because of less overhead absorption in the next couple of months.

I think at this point in time we are comfortable that the loading of the facility is correct. I am not expecting the kind of gyrations that happened in 2012 that caused massive distortions, significant distortions in late ’10 and early ’11. So we are not expecting any of that to repeat itself.

[Operator Instructions] Our next question is from Matt Dolan of Roth Capital Partners.

So first question is on the EBITDA guidance, and I apologize if this is repetitive or have been bounced around here. But given the run rate in Q1 and your commentary around both higher sequential revenues throughout the year as well gross margin, are there investments to anticipate in the operating expense line? Or why wouldn’t adjusted EBITDA kind of fall through as we go through the year from the Q1 run rate?

Yes, I think Matt, one of the things we have tried to do as we kicked into this year is to manage the expenses in the early part of the year. And that’s why I think we recorded operating expenses below I think, obviously Q1 last year and I believe Q4 of ’11 as well. So we feel that we are begin a lot more disciplined and judicious about the operating expense profile. Having said that we want to make sure that the business is well positioned to take advantage of opportunities. And that means that we need to ramp expenses in certain areas. Commercial expenses, clinical trial expenses if need be. We have got a flexibility within the P&L construct to be able to do that. And so in my mind it’s not really just looking at the P&L for Q1 and extrapolating it out for the rest of the year. It’s that we are comfortable with the EBITDA range that we have provided given what we see is going to unfold for the rest of this year.

Okay. That’s really good. Okay. And then on the sales side of things you have talked a lot about improving productivity numbers among reps and so forth. Maybe you can give us a little more detail on what the new strategy is so that we can get confidence in that revenue progression this year. Is it an increase in directly employed reps or those distributor reps with exclusivity contracts or something else? What's helping us get there, logically speaking?

Matt, this is Dirk. It’s really all of the above. One, it’s really focusing our management team on driving incremental productivity within the current distribution network. What we have done historically is focus them more on growing that network and we see a tremendous opportunity as we look through the different verticals business in terms of going back now and improving penetration rates. Getting additional product pickup within the current surgeon, customer community and within the current distribution network. Secondly, we are ramping up the number of direct sales reps that we have in areas where we just have not been able to attract the type of partner that we want. And that has been ongoing since certainly the first quarter. And thirdly, not just increasing exclusivity on a go-forward basis, but also enforcing exclusivity with current distributors. And we think there is significant leverage that we can get out of those activities.

Okay. Great.

Matt, one of the other growth strategies is this continuous flow of new products. One of the things that we decided we were trying to work on too many R&D projects. So we have actually focused the team on a number of projects that have the potential to deliver revenue in the back half of the year. And we fully resource these projects. There is commitment throughout the organization that these projects will come out on time. And so at the same time as Dirk is preparing the sales organization to be more efficient, we are about to give them a lot more tools as the year progresses.

Okay. That’s very helpful. And then finally on -- just a very general question on revenue guidance. What are you expecting for Alphatec market share this year? Does it go up, down, sideways, what?

It’s a good question. Obviously we intend to capture market share as we go forward. What's interesting even though on a sales basis, the revenue was flat. They are basically up just 1% in the U.S. Q4 to Q1. On a unit or procedural basis we actually saw improvement. So we think we are still taking share but not enough right now to offset price declines and that’s what we are looking to correct. So we believe we will have the ability to continue to take share and to continue to grow above the market on a go forward basis.

Our next question is from Mark Landy of Summer Street Research.

Thanks for taking my call and I apologize because I missed of the call there, I had other calls that were going on. But I think I did catch the gist of some of what you said relating to the product focus or the new product focus. And first my question relates to the regulatory process related to the refresher type products versus these new products. Obviously the brand-new products that are taking it up for a while, taking longer than on thought and are more expensive. But what have you anticipated as the average clearance time for these refresher products. And do you think that you can meet those timelines that you are looking at in terms of pulling them together? Can you get those [indiscernible] your product?

This is Les. Excellent question. One, as we went through screen, we looked at -- we started with 24 pretty well-thought-out R&D projects. And the screen was, which of these projects can we get out this year considering all the elements, regulatory, manufacturing, quality, clinical. And we focused on this number of products based on the fact that a, it’s a very clear path to get it through the FDA, it’s already approved by the FDA. Now we have some other wonderful products that are in the pipeline that are going to take a little longer to get through the FDA. But that was definitely one of the screens we put these products through before picking them to be our focus products for the year.

Okay. And then in terms of the transition of kind of more in-house manufacturing from other project manufacturers for you. Where are you on that regulatory process? Was most of that in....?

We are actually into the OQPQ process as we speak. So we going through process validation right now.

Okay. And is that just a typical timeframe, Mike, or does anything kind of...

I think with the new technology the actual process validation takes its time. It’s been on the way for 2 months right now. I don’t want to commit a day as to when we pulled the trigger on it. But we anticipate, we are on our internal timeline for process validation and clearance. And it certainly is in sync with our back half expectations.

Mike, I think and you and I discussed some of this offline but your basic business has been doing really well and now since you joked about it, kind of flying under the radar screen. It seems to be in a little bit more of a tough time right now, partly I think due to some of the market side. I think last year we had some of the large companies at the had some [indiscernible], relate to some products, they had some of it [indiscernible] maybe there was some share for you guys to pickup. Perhaps some of your competitors were reluctant to not compete on pricing are now coming around today. How much of that growth do you think perhaps has gone away, opportunity has gone away now you compete in case you had them before, you were be able to get business is some place....?

It’s Dirk. We think there is still opportunity in the market. It has been tough. We do see it stabilizing some and as we get some of these new products out and I think this refocus of our sales team is overdue and will allow us sort of to get back on track in terms of reaccelerating our growth rate. So I think that opportunity is still there. It may not be quite what it was but it’s certainly still there.

I think, Mark, I mean it’s a complex question obviously. I think the price deterioration that we have been seeing isn’t necessarily the same as the way our competition sees it. We clearly took a significant step down in 2010. We have gone through and anniversaried a lot of those elements as we go into 2012. So our prior period comparisons on pricing don’t look that bad when we talk in terms of low single-digits. But it’s clear from what's going on in the marketplace today that pricing is still quite prevalent and price decrease is by our competition and by our customers is very much top of mind. So it’s an issue that doesn’t go away.

And Mike, I will catch up with you guys on some of the refocusing of the sales force. I am still [indiscernible]. But my last question is probably more of a corporate strategy and a corporate focus. There was this push towards branding the company as the Asian spine company. How do you think about that branding relative to perhaps some of the trials and tribulations that you’ve had in getting some of those products through? And how do we think about the positioning of Alphatec to both the public and to the physicians while you kind of go through a refresher and then hopefully wait for some of that new product to get in, when it does get vetted through the FDA?

It’s quite a question. In surveying externally and internally since I have been with the company. The company is respected for being innovative and a leader in brining a lot of these new technologies to the market. And we certainly want to continue to have that reputation and so we will continue to broaden our product offering to treat the aging spine as well as deformities in the cervical area as well. But I think our focus on the aging spine is to key part of our strategy. Dirk?

Yes, exactly. I mean it really means just broadening the definition a little bit about what aging spine is. And one of the areas where we clearly focusing going forward is deformity. And adult deformity is a growing segment of the market. So although we haven’t been able to get a couple of the products on the market in the U.S. yet, they certainly are driving business internationally. And I think we are very well recognized and have been recognized for that focus. And every surgeon today is seeing the growing of their patient population. And so I think it continues to be a good space for us.

[Operator Instructions] Next question is from Josh Jennings of Cowen.

First I was hoping you could give us a little bit more color on pricing. I think you called out this Japan price cut of down 8% and I think overall you commented that overall pricing is in the low single digit as the headwind. Can you break that out at all regionally? I mean was pricing incrementally, sequentially worse than the U.S., Europe or international markets, or was it incrementally better from Q4?

I would say for us as opposed to for the category. In the U.S. our hospital pricing sequentially was better in Q1 than it was in Q4. And so it’s flat for all intents and purposes. So versus a year ago, we are low single-digit, and we have seen that contracting over the last 3 to 4 quarters as we compare it to the prior period. So for us, we have seen a contraction in pricing. I would say that as it relates specifically to Japan, it’s across the board, it’s all competition. They are seeing the same thing. I think that what we are seeing in, certainly the developed economies of Europe, is pretty heavy price pressure based upon government cutbacks in state funded health care programs. And that’s pretty much universal. And I don’t think that they are treating any of our competitor differently than ourselves. So we are all faced with that. And that’s a continuing and evolving problem. So for me, it’s more of, if you look at the state funded programs, that’s going to be continuing in 2012. Japan should be relatively stable from a reimbursement standpoint for the next couple of years. And in the U.S. I think that we versus our competition is relatively stable but you still have this continual downward pressure that impacts the business quarter-to-quarter.

And just on the Xenon pedicle screw. Was the April reintroduction to the market through the timing that you had anticipated back when you gave guidance on the Q4 call. And when do you think you can get back to the run rate that had historically been?

Yes. It was a couple of months later than what we had originally anticipated on the Q4 call. And what we are pleased with is we saw an immediate pickup by a few of the original customers and some it will take a little bit of time to get that run rate back up. So we think that we could certainly get back there but it will take a little bit of time.

And then last one to Solus. What were your expectations for that product, I know it was just in beta launch but what type of headwind is that creating in terms of those revenues falling out of your budget and where -- and I understand you are describing new product introductions as picking up the slack, but I was just curious on how big of an impact that is to your outlook for the year?

Yes, we have not been public, Josh, with the contribution of Solus in 2012. Obviously it’s a product that we have expectations for. But in the context of the overall revenue projections for the year, we are comfortable that we can have some downsides and some upsides.

Thank you. This ends the Q&A portion of today's conference. I’d like to turn the conference over to Les Cross for any closing remarks.

Great, thank you, operator. Thank you, everyone, for your time and attention. We look forward to joining you back here next quarter and update you on the progress of this reengineering of Alphatec Spine, so thank you.

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for your participation in today's conference. This concludes the program. You may now disconnect. Have a wonderful day.