Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Anterix First Quarter Fiscal Year 2023 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions] It is now my pleasure to turn the floor over to your host, Natasha Vecchiarelli. Ma'am, the floor is yours.

Good afternoon, everyone, and welcome to the Anterix First Quarter Fiscal Year 2023 Investor Call. I'm Natasha Vecchiarelli, Vice President, Investor Relations and Corporate Communications at Anterix. Joining me on the call today are Rob Schwartz, our President and CEO; Ryan Gerbrandt, our COO; Tim Gray, our CFO; and Chris Guttman-McCabe, our Chief Regulatory and Communications Officer. Before we begin, please note that during today's presentation, we may make forward-looking statements, either in our prepared remarks or in the associated question-and-answer session. These statements are based on current expectations or beliefs and are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially. Risk factors that may impact our performance are identified in our most recent SEC filings. Our SEC filings can be found on our website or on the SEC's website. Investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, and we disclaim any obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements after the date of this presentation. Following our prepared remarks, we will have an operator-led question-and-answer session. In addition, at the conclusion of today's call, a replay and transcript of our discussion will be posted to our Investor Relations website. With that, I'll turn the call over to Anterix' President and CEO, Rob Schwartz.

Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining the call. With our last call being just several weeks ago, I'm going to focus today's discussion on providing an update on our contract progress, customer pipeline and industry movement. And then we'll open it up for questions. As we have said, our Anterix mission is to be the de facto of private broadband solution for utilities. We fully recognize that continuing to close individual deals is a near-term imperative. Our goal is to capture the sector. While accomplishing this goal will take time, I remain confident that we are uniquely built to succeed in this effort. Let me share 3 reasons for my confidence. First, we have the right team with our Nextel lineage experienced in successfully pioneering a disruptive and transformative effort. Nextel was the first nationwide wireless platform and drove a range of industries: public safety, construction, utilities and more to adopt a single unified wireless solution. And at the time, it was also difficult to predict how long it would take to execute on that mission. With our focus on Anterix on the utility sector, we have added considerable utility knowledge and experience to our seasoned wireless team to support and advance our efforts. We believe this combination of wireless and utility experience is unmatched and best positions us to continue to win customers and execute on our business plan. Second, our solid financial position is a core element of our strategy, designed to ensure that we have the time it can take to define new market, move an industry and secure our de facto mission. We own a unique and valuable nationwide spectrum asset. We have a strong and debt-free balance sheet, operate a lean organization and our prudent steward of capital. At the end of the…

[Operator Instructions] Your first question is coming from George Sutton from Craig-Hallum.

This is Adam on for George. Rob, great to hear about the fourth contract under LOI. Is there an updated contract of proceeds to go along with that?

One important point, right, in the last call, we talked about 3 LOI. On this call we gave some illustrative color on 4 different deals. There's not a complete overlap there, and we're happy to say that because -- so there isn't really a direct correlation of the numbers from before in this time, but Ryan, maybe you want to fill in some color on that.

Yes, happy to. Yes, just to correlate, like Rob said, we weren't intentionally drawing a one-to-one relationship between the 2, Adam. I'll say specifically though, the 4 examples that Rob walked through from Phase III of the pipeline, 2 of those do specifically have LOIs and 2 don't. Again, reflecting what we said earlier about the optionality and kind of the multiple ways that we've seen customers really participate in the journey, reflecting their unique needs and complications as they work their way through the process. What we're really trying to bring attention to as we focus in on kind of the later stages of the pipeline, is specifically what some of those methods are that utilities are going through and being able to demonstrate specifically where some of these customers are in the pipeline. So just to highlight again, really what the focus was on the 4 different examples that we walked through, the first, of course, was really speaking to a specific example where there's a significant level of maturity in the deal. The contract structure, the deployment time lines, the elements that Rob listed, really getting to the element now of the executive approval cycle that all utilities go through and are same in a similar shape and form, but all have a unique cycle and process that we help stakeholder their way through. The second was really focusing on how LTE we found is a part of a much larger deal that the utility is working on. As we've talked a lot about the macro issues facing utilities today, the focus on grid modernization or bringing in renewables and clean energy sources become really macro level projects. PLTE is a relatively small part of, but it speaks to the level of work that the utility needs…

And maybe if I focus just on Phase III of the pipeline. Any commentary on the mix there, whether these are opportunities at a parent company or operating company level?

They're split, frankly. Like I said, these examples kind of capture a few of them, but we're definitely seeing both. But the highlight I'll kind of take out of it as articulated in a couple of ways, some of the ones coming through are certainly starting to represent some of the larger opportunities that we're seeing in the pipeline, which we think is a great example of kind of the mix to come in line after the first movers and the early adopters as we start moving more deeply into some of the larger companies out there in the national utility landscape.

Your next question is coming from Phil Cusick from JPMorgan.

Two, if I can. First, can you give us some idea on the progress on these 4 deals since the May call? And are we talking about weeks, months or years to get to the next signing? And then second of all, you talked about some -- a couple of companies that have multistate in there. Can you give us an idea how many states we're talking about? Is it sort of a handful or high-single digits getting into the double digits?

I'm going to let Ryan jump into it. Just one sort of setup on it, as you said, since May, we didn't give color on these 4 specific deals in May. But what I did say in my comments is that we're seeing progress across the pipeline, meaning that we're seeing advancements in growth in each of the phases of the pipeline. And these are all -- of the large deals we're talking about now and some of the LOIs we talked about last call, these are multistate deals that we're not going to give you the exact number of states, but have a significant impact on sort of the overall footprint of our success. Ryan, do you want to comment on the first question?

Yes. I'll add a little bit more color. I mean we're seeing progress all the time, I think is the right way to think about it. Certainly, as Rob said, well, we didn't specifically focus on these deals individually at May. We're progressing all these activities in parallel with our growing sales and support teams every single day and see momentum moving forward. Sometimes it's faster than other times, like you see with any kind of complex transaction, but we're continuing to see them move forward as the developments are working forward. In terms of the specifics on states, as Rob said, we cover a variety of different scenarios. I can't get them to specifics on how many are in them, but definitely span some of the larger companies and utilities in the U.S.

And any idea of weeks, months a year before we are going to see one of these signed -- speaking as an inside, maybe rule out shorter term rather than longer term.

Yes. So I appreciate the question. I think as we emphasized in my comments earlier, we're confident we're on a great path, especially in the first example that I talked about. But if any we've learned our lesson about predicting the precision of that is not a good place to be, but the overall movement and that specific transaction we highlighted, we're confident we'll see that moving forward at a good pace.

Your next question is coming from Simon Flannery from Morgan Stanley.

Thank you for the color on those 4 examples. What's the status of the third LOI that was not in those 4 deals?

Look, I think as we said in the prior call, those LOIs were comprised of both Phase II and III. So you can use your imagination that like every one of these deals, we use an LOI as a tool. As Ryan said, it's not a necessity in every deal, but it's a tool to get alignment of commitment, right? It's a letter of intent. It states the intention of the parties. And so in one of those 3 cases, we used it earlier in the pipeline to be able to align on our priorities. In the other 2, it was used later. So what I can tell you that every one of our deals, nothing has fallen out, everything remains in the pipeline and moves forward. And that's pretty important given our mission of being a de facto standard. It's not that we're losing deals to competition or if the utilities not moving forward. Just the opposite. Everything progresses. As Ryan said, there are good days and bad days about the speed of that progress, but we continue to push them all forward.

Just want to highlight one other point there, too. I think the most notable thing from the pipeline that I don't want to overlook is the comment that we're seeing development in all phases of the pipeline. So that means we're seeing overall growth in the pipeline. We're seeing the development of accounts work their way through. And obviously, that's inclusive of deals that we're working under the construct of LOIs, and the ones that we're not. When we're seeing the kind of movement that I would hope to be seeing kind of into this phase of the process and the level of education and the momentum and the comments that Rob was making earlier about the activities in the market, it's resonating its way down and the activities we're seeing in the day-to-day activities that the sales team are driving. And it excites me at kind of the volume of that activity that we're seeing and puts us still on good track to keep the total market moving forward, which is the necessary objective to achieve a de facto standard goal that we set.

And I think, whilst you don't want to give a specific forecast, I think you did reiterate your confidence in the $1.8 billion on or around fiscal '24. Is that still the case?

Yes. So it remains our target. It does involve us plus or minus a quarter or 2 in that target. For us, it's about the long-term value opportunity that I talked about earlier. It's about driving the industry adoption holistically. Clearly, we've got to deliver on deals, and we know that and we will continue to do so. The precision of that target, it remains our target, and we're sticking with it.

Great. And the big carriers are all starting to talk about the B2B opportunities, private networks, stand-alone 5G. You've got the hyperscalers in there as well. What are you seeing on the competitive landscape and are they trying to compete against your utilities and maybe try to win some of those customers away from you?

Yes. Look, Simon, from our view, and we talked about being a pioneer, as you know, when we filed our FCC petition now over 6, 7 years ago, it was about pioneering private networks as a concept, which then it was unheard of. Now absolutely, there's no shortage of people talking about it. I think what's important is, well, as I said, what we're achieving. I really think we are the leading private LTE movement. We're leading the movement at this time. The footprint that we've established with our -- just our existing customers already, I think, is bigger probably than everybody else combined from a scale standpoint. And as you can see by what we talked about in the pipeline, all of the people who have publicly spoken in some way, right? I went through the folks who are involved in our advisory board for our platform, the experiment licenses, those who are now members of UBBA and which continues to grow. That's half of the nation, half of the value of our spectrum in the nation at least. And so just as far as the impact we are having on private LTE overall, yes, there's other -- I would say others who are talking about it, but I don't think it's from a competitive standpoint, really talking about the wide area coverage that we're talking about. When you measure it, whether it's on pops or square miles or otherwise, I'm confident we have a far more substantial position and see a lot more opportunity for growth.

[Operator Instructions] Your next question is coming from Katherine Knop from B. Riley Financial.

So as you know, NextNav has a continuous 8-megahertz block of 900- megahertz spectrum in the LMS band between up and down lengths of your 3x3 private LTE. So NextNav only needs 5 megahertz to broadcast the time signal requires to appoint terrestrial GPS network leaving 3 megahertz, so plus that potentially could be repurposed for communications. Question from me for you guys, do you think a 3x3 private LTE is enough for utilities or are there some customers that might be better off going to a 5x5 if that were possible in the future?

Yes. Let me take your second question first, and then I'll go to the earlier part of it. Yes, absolutely. We think our 3x3 as a starting point for a private network is plenty of spectrum. And there's a lot of good examples of it, not just the customers we've signed to date who have done their deep analysis of capacity planning, the Southern company who runs a private LTE network on that 6-megahertz of spectrum as well. And they've made the conscious decision to also allow other third parties or the like-minded parties to utilize that network. So they actually have capacity to handle their own needs as well as others. And speaking to question about NextNav and we know those folks who have a lot of respect for their business model, serving the vertical aspect of location. I think the spectrum is really not directly comparable to what we have. And we have exclusive use of our spectrum, specifically for LTE. And I think that there's some different kind of usage. Like I said before about other spectrum bands, there's a lot of different bands that the FCC has designated for a lot of different uses. And so for us, starting with the 6 megahertz and like every good carrier model, there's always opportunity to expand. As we say, that's a rich man's problem. If you're able to fill up the capacity and utilize it all, it means you have such powerful use cases and you can probably think about adding more spectrum, other layers that layer cake as you expand the model.

Your next question is coming from Walter Piecyk from LightShed.

Rob, what's been the dialogue around CBRS lately, a variety of companies that you're talking to, existing and LOIs and otherwise?

The CBRS dialogue, I think, continues to grow as a complementary aspect to low-band spectrum, right? The 900 being sub-1 gig serves a very different purpose of what CBRS does as a solution set. CBRS is great spectrum. I've heard it described by folks in that space as super WiFi, right? It replaces a lot of the use cases that Wi-Fi was okay at, but is more proprietary whether it's licensed or unlicensed. We have numerous both customers and prospective customers that CBRS is part of their either licensed or unlicensed part of their model, and they continue to drive that dual band solution, right? No different than everyone is using WiFi in their offices and steps outside and goes on to a wide area cellular network. CBRS will be the same thing for a lot of these customers. We're in a factory, in an office, in a substation they can use it to more capacity into the complement. Another important point about it, though, is that we've got our Anterix active ecosystem that I mentioned earlier with 80 different companies and growing. Within that solution set, one of the key things we did was identify the need for communications modules that can both bridge the gap between CBRS our band and even carrier bands. And one of the opportunities we've done is we've driven that crowd sourcing of vendors to collectively drive a module maker to make a solution set just for that need. It's a really good growing example of why there needs to be intermediary like us to help drive the solution set. It's one of many examples that you'll see that the ecosystem is driving.

Let me ask the question this way. Do you have - when you're having discussions with your again, existing licensees, the people that we sold to as well as the 4 LOIs as well as other people at different stages of this…

Walt, you still with us? All right. Operator we can proceed and we'll go back to Walt when he calls back in.

Certainly. Thank you, everyone. That concludes our Q&A session. I will now hand the conference back to our host for closing remarks. Please go ahead.

Thanks very much, and thank you, everybody, for your continued interest and time today. We look forward to talking to you all soon. Have a great day.

Thank you, ladies and gentlemen. This concludes today's event. You may disconnect at this time, and have a wonderful day. Thank you for your participation.