Hello, and welcome everyone to the ATI Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2025 Results Conference Call. My name is Becky, and I will be your operator today. All lines will be muted throughout the presentation portion of the call with a chance for Q&A at the end. I will now hand over to your host, David Weston, to begin. Please go ahead. Good morning.

And welcome to ATI's Fourth Quarter 2025 Earnings Call. Today's discussion is being webcast at atimaterials.com. Joining me are Kimberly Fields, President and CEO, Rob Foster, Senior Vice President and CFO, and Don Newman, ATI's retiring CFO now Senior Adviser to the CEO. Before starting our prepared remarks, I would like to draw your attention to the supplemental presentation that accompanies this call. Those slides provide additional color and details on our results, capabilities, and outlook and can also be found on our at atimaterials.com. After our prepared remarks, we'll open the line for questions. As a reminder, all forward-looking statements are subject to various assumptions and caveats. These are noted in the earnings release and in the accompanying presentation. Now turn the call over to Kimberly Fields. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us.

Before I begin, I'd like to welcome Rob Foster as ATI's new Chief Financial Officer. Rob brings deep operational experience, strong financial discipline, and proven leadership to this role after more than a decade at ATI. He has been a trusted financial partner of mine since 2019, and I'm confident he will help lead ATI into its next phase of profitable growth. I also want to thank Don Newman for his leadership over the past six years. Under Don's tenure, ATI completed a successful transformation, expanding margins, strengthening cash flow, and sharpening our focus on differentiated aerospace and defense markets. Don will share highlights from our 2025 performance shortly. Turning to our results, the fourth quarter capped a very successful full year. We exceeded profit and free cash flow expectations, expanded margins, improved operational reliability, and deepened our customer relationships. We are entering 2026 with momentum across our core markets in aerospace and defense. Let me start with the key results in the fourth quarter. Q4 revenue was $1.2 billion. Adjusted EBITDA was $232 million, above the high end of our guidance range. Adjusted EBITDA margin was 19.7%, an increase of 180 basis points from Q4 2024, demonstrating continued progress toward our 2027 margin goals. For full year 2025, revenue was $4.6 billion, up 5% year over year, driven by 14% growth in aerospace and defense. Adjusted EBITDA exceeded $859 million, up 18% year over year. Adjusted EPS was $3.24, up 32% from 2024. Adjusted free cash flow totaled $380 million, up 53% from 2024, also exceeding the high end of our guidance. We returned $470 million to shareholders this year, representing 124% of free cash flow. These results reflect disciplined execution, strong pricing, and favorable mix driven by our most differentiated products. Given our confidence in customer demand and…

2025 was a proof point for ATI. Strong aerospace and defense demand translated into a richer mix, sustained margins, robust cash flow, and a stronger balance sheet. In the fourth quarter, we finished the year with solid execution across the business and strong cash generation. This reinforces our confidence in ATI's long-term strategy. Revenue for the full year totaled $4.6 billion, our highest annual revenue since 2012. Sales were up 5% over 2024, powered by 14% growth in aerospace and defense overall. Within A&D, jet engine sales grew 21% year over year, and defense grew 14%. Our transformation continues as we focus our mix on ATI's most valuable products and customers. Full-year adjusted EBITDA exceeded $859 million, up 18% over 2024. Adjusted EBITDA was $232 million in the fourth quarter, $1 million above the high end of our guidance. This is a 3% sequential increase over a strong third quarter and up 11% over last year's fourth quarter. Free cash flow for the full year totaled $380 million, up 53% year over year. Full-year operating cash flow increased more than 50% to $614 million. Managed working capital improved sequentially to 32.5% of sales in the fourth quarter. Capital expenditures for the year totaled $281 million, of which customers funded $25 million, for a net expenditure of $256 million. These investments supported growth, reliability, and improved product flow focused on our highest return differentiated products. Other deployments include repayment of $150 million of debt in Q4 and repurchasing a total of $170 million of our shares during the year. We are pleased with the continued progress in expanding margins. In 2019, our adjusted EBITDA margins were 10.7%. Then we launched our strategic transformation. The strategy to focus on our differentiated products in the A&D markets, along with improving operations, resulted in…

Thanks, Rob. ATI enters 2026 with a strong foundation. Differentiated capabilities, robust contractual partnerships, disciplined capital deployment, and a proven ability to execute. Over the past several years, we've transformed ATI into a business where these strengths reinforce one another. Differentiated materials lead to long-term contracts. Those contracts secure premium pricing, expand share, and generate cash. And that cash is reinvested with discipline, expanding capacity, improving reliability, and deepening our role across the most strategic customer platforms. The world increasingly relies on ATI's differentiated capabilities to support next-generation aircraft, advanced defense systems, and expanding energy generation. And we are delivering to meet that demand. With that, let's open the line for your questions.

Thank you. Please press star followed by two. When preparing to ask your question, please ensure your device is unmuted locally. Our first question comes from Seth Seifman from JPMorgan. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.

Hey, thanks very much, and good morning, everyone. Don, just want to say thanks for all the help over the years. And congratulations, and best of luck. Why don't you start off maybe with a little bit of a big picture question? I know you probably can't talk about a lot of the details, but when we're thinking about expanding capacity with customer support, how do we think about how much of the new capacity is to the customer versus how much you have at your disposal to serve other customers? And then also, you know, the customer support helps to reduce the denominator and the ROI. How do we think about the numerator?

Hey, Seth. Yeah. And you're right. We can't share a lot of details around what products or what projects these go to unless we've done a public press release, which we have on some of these in the past. The way to think about that and the way that these are structured, these agreements, is that it's really around security of access to highly constrained differentiated materials. And so, as we are partnering to do these investments, the customers are one looking to ensure that that capacity is available and they have right of first refusal for, you know, whatever that negotiated amount is. But beyond that, as we are managing our mix and managing demand, we're able to flex and move that to support whatever business at the time makes the most sense for us. So, you know, it does give them, like I said, that surety that there's investment and supply coming. Work very closely. I think the other benefit for us, maybe twofold. One, is that alignment around customer demand when they need it. So it's coming on exactly when that demand's coming, but also the becomes much more abbreviated because of the focus around resourcing and the investment and alignment of interest there. On your question around the return, you know, I've shared in the past our threshold for returns on our projects are all 30% plus. And obviously, with this contributed capital from our customers, that helps drive those projects even more robust returns for us over the project timeline.

Excellent. Excellent. Thanks. And maybe just as a quick follow-up, if you could provide an update on I think you talked about airframe growth being more pronounced in the second half of the year. Just maybe an update on the stocking situation there and what kind of visibility that you have?

Yeah. I would say, you know, airframe inventories are getting much closer to being in line. Inventory alignment has progressed meaningfully through 2025. As I shared in the past, they only had pockets where the inventory they were working to normalize that. And so from our perspective, as we see inventories across that supply chain, it's largely will be rightsized by 2026 and that's where we are anticipating that we'll start to see some modest improvement in order rates and demand as we get into the second half. And clearly, Boeing had some great news to share this week. They're on a great path. And as they continue to pull and increase their ramp, build rates, we anticipate that normalization, you know, moving even quicker.

Great. Thank you very much.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Pete Skibitski from Alembic Global. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.

Hey, good morning, guys. Nice quarter. Hey, Kim, you've had some great history here in terms of defense sales and a, you know, nice projection, and we still seems like there's still a lot of runway there with this reconciliation bill spend yet to come. I was wondering if you could parse out some of the pieces of defense revenue. I think naval is about 50% of defense for you, but maybe you could talk about missiles some more in terms of how big that could be because we've seen some historic contracts for PAC-3 and THAAD. You know, items that you guys have content on. So we just wonder if you could parse through some of the growth drivers in defense there. Thank you.

Yeah. Sure. And, yeah, I'm very excited about the defense. You know, for the full year '25, it was up 14%. We're expecting that growth to accelerate into the mid-teens in '26. And as you said, the spending that is coming in the programs that we have content and are supported are gonna just continue to accelerate that. So as you said, as we break down and I look at the defense markets, just generally, naval nuclear is probably a little bit less than you said. Closer to 35% to 40% of that overall. And then missile today is around, say, 20% of that total. And as I mentioned, you know, we're continuing to win new content on both current programs as well as development in new programs. And so I mentioned in the prepared remarks specifically around PAC-3 and THAAD, utilizing our very specialized C103 material. We're one of the few US suppliers and producers of that material, and that really goes into that high temperature, high strength applications. And then the titanium six four, which goes to helping support the EV investment we made over the last few years. It's coming online very well. It's right at the right time. And as you said, both of those missile programs, I think they're up three to 4x in spending as we work to replenish our stockpiles. So defense is an area that has continued to grow. It's a very attractive market for us, and it does have a lot of improvement and opportunity as we go into '26 and beyond, frankly.

Great. Thanks, guys.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Richard Safran from Seaport Research Partners. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.

Thanks very much. Good morning, everybody. Don, it's been great working with you. Best of luck. First question, I think it's the obvious one. Are you still good with your 2027 guide, you know, that you have out there? I'm curious if you'd like to update it right now. I mean, you're guiding to $1 billion to $1.2 billion in EBITDA in '27. And as Kim, you know, you said you're guiding to $1 billion in '26 at the midpoint. And, you know, if I heard you right, you're expecting 40% incremental margins in '26. So I just what does this all say about your 27% guide?

Yeah. Hi, Rich. This is Rob. I'll jump in here. You know, when I think about the 2027 guidance, you know, I'm really confident in the guidance. You know, it's not, guess everyone doesn't know, but I was a part of the team prior to being the president of our specialty alloys and components business. I was running the operational finance group. So been very closely involved with these numbers. And very confident in our ability to achieve these kind of targets. At this point, I'm going to spend some time in the chair, and we're going to get to reviewing the outlook in longer range and normal course. And I'll be in a position to give you an update whenever we get to that point. I'm not there yet. But I will say that I do have some bias to the top end of the EBITDA margin percent and I do feel really confident with those 2027s, but we're in a position right now to give an update.

Okay. Thanks. Second, Kim, I just was following up on some of your comments about defense, but possibly, but past few years have been, you know, pretty good for share gains. You know, Pratt VSNPO, you know, you picked up. I'm kinda curious. What the opportunity set is for share gains in 2026. And I'm thinking given spending levels, you know, are most of them in defense right now? I mean, you know, that's just my take on things, but I'm very interested in what you're seeing. Thanks.

Yeah. Rich, that's an interesting, you know, as I look at 2026, I see opportunities for share gains. And in fact, we've already had a couple here early in the year across three key markets. One is defense. As you mentioned, and I talked about some of those programs. In the missiles, but also in the Jets and Rotor Hub. Areas as well where I know we are winning share, taking share, winning new programs and new parts on those on that equipment. But the other two areas that I think we still have opportunities are one in jet engine. And second in specialty energy. Both of those, I would say, over just the last thirty to sixty days, we won significant new share positions and really those are related to where our peers maybe are challenged to meet the requirements of the ramp. Are challenged to meet the requirements of the OEMs, so the support those rates. And when that, you know? And, again, I mentioned those materials on slide six that we've got the proprietary differentiated materials. Those give us an opportunity then to grow and continue to grow that content on each of those engines. And, you know, I'm very pleased that our customers do feel like they can rely on us to deliver reliability, high product. And I'm seeing share gains account across all three of those. And, again, the tailwinds for the growth of those three markets as well and increasing demand, I think, are going to continue to open up new opportunities for us to go in and win share and win new program positions.

Thank you. Very much.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Scott Deuschle from Deutsche Bank. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.

Hey, good morning. Kim, based on the $350 million revenue disclosure you offered, it looks like you'd be adding around 9,000 tons of annual nickel mill capacity, with this new VIM, at least based on my napkin math. Does that sound roughly right in the right ballpark?

Hey, Scott. Generally, it's a little bit mix dependent. Right? So the materials that this purpose-built capital is going in for have differences around melt rates, around production time. And so you're in the ball that's part of the reason we shared the revenue targets because some of these are very, very difficult and complicated to make. And so it doesn't equate to what you may see as a general-purpose capacity or run rate.

Just as a follow-up, can you share how the melt times typically compare for one of these exotic alloys like RENE 65 versus a more standard alloy like seven eighteen?

Yeah. I would say if you take kind of a seven eighteen versus maybe one of those proprietary alloys on that slide six, it could be up to three to four times longer melt times. These are all specified controlled melts to get that quality and grain structure required. Requirements that the OEMs are looking for.

That's really helpful. Thank you. And then, Rob, I was just wondering if you could walk us through the 2026 pricing outlook specifically for the exotic alloys that AANS makes. Zirconium, hafnium, niobium, obviously, some big moves on the hafnium market. So curious what that pricing outlook looks like for '26.

Yes. So at a high level, when I think about the walk from the 2025 EBITDA to the 2026 guidance, the way to think about it is roughly 50% pricing, 50% volume. And yeah, there has been some pretty significant movement with some of the alloys within our specialty alloys and components business, as well as some of the other businesses that we have. We don't really disclose that detail. We do talk about zirconium and related products. Thinking about that in the context, just under 10% of our kind of volumes in terms of revenue. But I will say that the pricing assumptions that were used in the 2026 guidance aren't too far from the current information available. So we've considered a lot of that movement into our 2026 guide.

Thank you.

Our next question comes from Andre Madrid from BTIG. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.

Yes. Good morning, everybody. And Don, thank you again for everything, and best of luck in future endeavors.

Thank you, Andre.

You know, not to nitpick, but when looking at airframe, I think you guys are now projecting mid to high single digit. But before, it was just high single digit for '26. I mean, what's giving you any pause there and what would need to happen for you guys to come in the lower side of that range?

Yeah. I'd say, you know, our guidance is built on executed customer production schedules and contractual commitments and not necessarily those headline build rate targets. So, you know, as you said, you know, we're coming in at that mid to high single digit growth rates. But specifically, what we base our outlook on is the OEM order rates, the schedules that they've given us for both Airbus and Boeing, you know, contractual minimums. I'll just remind you that our Boeing contract has contractual minimum. There's order frameworks and timing for both of those that tie demand material demand to those actual production plans. And I would say what's really coloring this is maybe a conservative view of the timing for particularly early in the year where we are today, rather than assuming immediate full rate execution. And so we'll continue to update that as we go through the year. But, you know, we're encouraged by that progress Boeing shared on production. But we're not assuming best case rate acceleration as we go through the year. The guidance is really a measured ramp airframe weighted toward that 2026. With production rates that convert to orders and shipments. And as far as up or what would have to be true, these contracts, as I shared with you, expanded both our mix, our participation, our product portfolio. We won price. We won share. And so as they start to accelerate those build rates, we anticipate capturing that share and that volume as we go into the back half of the year. So together, it's taking all this together, supports really a, you know, we're looking at a steady airframe growth throughout the year, modest in the first half, accelerating in the second half, resulting in that mid- to high single digit growth for 2026.

Got it. That's helpful. Thank you, Kim. And if I could just squeeze one more in. I mean, looking at Jet Engine, it looks like, you know, this was second quarter MRO coming in at about half of Jet Engine. Do you expect similar contribution into '26? Is that what's baked into the guide?

Yes, Scott. So I look at the frame, I would say that the jet engine growth in 2026 assumes roughly that continuation of mix being 50% MRO, 50% OEM.

Got it. Awesome. Appreciate the color, everybody, and have a great day.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Myles Walton from Wolfe Research. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.

Thanks. Good morning. Kim, you commented on the nonseasonal nature of pickup of order activity at the start of the year. Can you maybe expand upon that directionally where that's coming from? How unusual it is in any quantification manner? And then where did the backlog end up at year end?

Sure. I could definitely, Myles, talk through that. So we did see an uptick in orders at strength in order inquiries as well as order placements. Just in the first, you know, thirty days here of the year already. And what we're attributing and what it looks like is that it's related supply chain readiness moves as people are moving and are taking, you know, the positive feedback and Boeing's progress to get in position for upcoming rate increases. I will say, you know, from a magnitude standpoint, it's coming in very strong, maybe stronger than we've seen in the last few years for these products and for these airframe applications. But we really don't rely on that short-term transactional buying. Nearly most of our exposure is governed by that airframe and long-term agreement that very closely tie to customer production plans. But, you know, we're going to continue to monitor that. It kind of goes to my earlier comments around the airframe market, and we'll monitor as they continue to make those rate increases, both Boeing and Airbus. And update that as we see opportunities.

And the backlog, the provide that at year end? Oh, sorry. Sequential year on year?

Yes. Yes. From a backlog standpoint, you know, our backlog today remains just under one year of revenue, which is about where we'd like to see that backlog at. You know, the one thing that I would anticipate seeing, you know, when I look at lead times for those materials as we just talked about in those proprietary materials around PQ titanium, nickel, alloys, those specialized nickel alloys, and the exotic alloys, like hafnium and zirconium, all of those are extending, some up to two times since a quarter ago. And so, you know, we are looking, and we would expect to see that backlog start to come up a little bit as we continue to implement productivity improvements and efficiency improvements to produce those orders and get those shipped. I'd say in general, those are up it's up about 3%, but as I said, we can we target around one year of backlog generally. I think the other thing I just mentioned is that the backlog is not an indicator. As we've talked about many times before, a lot of our customer demand is contracted. And with those contracts, what that affords our customers is a reserve place in line. And so what I say is it's been the supply chains have stabilized. I've seen some really nice order patterns generally coming in. But what we don't have is you don't have customers coming in and maybe speculative buying or putting in their orders extra early because they know when we get to the lead times in frozen windows that they've got a spot and they can load those against their forecast and what we've reserved for them. So the one pop was that early early in the year, watching the supply chain, ready for the airframe ramp, and that might have some impact. But, generally, we'll stay in about the range that we're at today.

Thank you.

Our next question comes from Gautam Khanna from TD Cowen. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.

Hi. Good morning, guys.

Morning.

And congrats to both Rob and Don. I had two quick ones. First, I was wondering if you could just characterize the VIM capacity add as a percentage of your capacity. So how much does it add to it? And maybe if you could give us some context on how many nickel alloy bins you actually have. As well in the answer.

Sure. So we aren't really sharing the total capacity add. As I said, it's to measure given the product portfolio and how that mix can change, you know, depending on which products that we're making. As I said, you know, we're adding this capacity. It's targeted, and it's phased. It's going to focus on supporting those next-gen alloy platforms like LEAP and GTF with that differentiated rotating part alloys that are shown on slide six. So that's the $350 million run rate in '28 is a good way to think about incremental revenue. As you start to model and look forward. From a VIM capacity standpoint or VIM number of VIMs that we have, we have currently four VIMs, but what I might caution is obviously, this investment allows us to up with state-of-the-art equipment and technology helping to drive the highest quality product and cost competitive. And so we anticipate that there will be some improvements in productivity and output from the brand new equipment and new controls and so forth. So today we have four. This would be our fifth.

And just to put a finer point on it, I mean, I know it depends on mix and the like, and therefore, you're talking about revenue and not tonnage. But, you know, do you have a ballpark sense of what the capacity increase is? Is it, like, 10, 15%? Is it simple to say if you go to four to five, it's 25%? I'm just ballpark. I'm not asking for specifics.

Yeah. Well, I'd say, you know, I shared, previously the remount gives us kind of eight to ten. And I would say this is in that ballpark.

Okay. And, you know, again, part of that revenue uptick is really around, you know, the price and mix that we're winning with the LTAs that are supporting this asset. And we're about 80% contracted right now for that capacity.

Thanks, Kim. And I was just curious also, as we look to 'twenty seven and beyond, what's your ballpark sense of how much price we as outsiders should anticipate the company will get, you know, company-wide, if you will. Pricing year over year, '26 to '27, '27 and beyond.

As I well, as I look at '26, we see substantial price opportunities and mix as we're going forward. These assets and the products that we're making as I shared a couple times, proprietary hot section rotating parts, they go into both MRO and OE. Almost every shop visit's going to be looking at those compressor disks and turbine disks. And so, you know, as we're going forward, we're continuing to maintain that value-based pricing. It's protected under long-term agreements. You know, I would say as you look at our guide for 2026, for example, you can say half of that is related to price and mix, that uptick, and the other half is volume. And I would anticipate that continuing throughout the decade as we bring on these new assets and bring these new materials to our customers.

Thank you.

Sure. Thank you.

Our next question comes from Phil Gibbs from KeyBanc Capital Markets.

Hey, good morning.

Morning. Good morning, Phil.

This one. Wanted to just ask a general question on headcount and what are your plans on staffing for '26 as you meet some of these growth aspirations?

Yeah. Thanks, Phil. I'd say, you know, we're stable on headcount, as I look at and that really stabilized through 2025. And you saw the efficiency and the equipment reliability and that improvement that was then flowing through our financials as our employees moved up the learning curve and became more experienced. So from an overall metric, we're not seeing any spikes in hiring or a lot of new hiring coming in. Now as you mentioned, for this new capacity, we are we've got some open positions to help support that even today. But I will tell you support from our current experienced workforce has been overwhelming. For example, I know they posted six positions here just in the last two weeks, and they had 60 of our current employees that are excited and want to be part of this project. And moving over. And so our goal is to bring in our most experienced operators that know how to make these very, very tough to produce and long qualification times. And that's really where I'm focused as we think about how do we accelerate the qualification of this new equipment that we brought in. I've given you kind of a six to nine-month qualification time with the revenue run rate. But I do anticipate the experienced operators will be moving in, and the installed base and quality systems that already support these products and obviously, the alignment with our customers that we'll be able to accelerate that. So overall, not huge hiring demands. We'll do it in a measured way. But we've got a lot of enthusiasm, I'd say, from our current workforce that want to be part of these investments in this new project.

And then this is a follow-up on isothermal forgings, you've got jet engine growth in the mid-teens for 2026. Is the isothermal forging piece likely to grow beyond that as you continue to gain share in content and new expanded wins with folks like Pratt? And I think you also have maybe more engine manufacturers and growing in that portfolio and beyond Pratt with capabilities. To maybe talk to some of that because I know it's an important differentiator for you. Thank you.

Yeah. ISO forging is, it's a very important part. It's in high demand. Our lead times are out beyond eighteen months at this point. As you look at the engine OEMs, we support all three. Almost as close to an even mix between the three, especially as you mentioned with the GTF and the growth and the share we've had over the last two years with them. That will continue to grow. I do see continued increased demand from all three where they're looking for things between MRO, upgrade packages, modifications. So those are continuing to come in, and we're really focused on the productivity, the debottlenecking, continuing to expand the new heat treat and ultrasonic test capabilities that we brought online. So we do see growth there. I do think as we work through this year, but as we think about the rest of this decade, that will be an area that, you know, we'll be talking with our customers closely around, making sure that we've got the right capacity in place to continue to support their needs.

Thank you.

Thank you. We currently have no further questions. So I'll hand back over to Kim for closing remarks.

Thank you. So as ATI enters 2026, we're entering from a position of strength and momentum. I want to thank our customers for their continued trust, our shareholders for their support, and most importantly, our ATI team for another outstanding year of execution. We're confident in the path ahead and look forward to updating you on our progress.

This concludes today's call. Thank you for joining. You may now disconnect your lines.