Greetings. Welcome to the Aurora First Quarter 2022 Business Review Call. [Operator Instructions] Please note this conference is being recorded. I will now turn the conference over to your host, Stacy Feit, Vice President of Investor Relations. Thank you. You may begin.

Thank you, Alex. Good afternoon, everyone, and welcome to our first quarter 2022 business review call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded. We announced our results earlier this afternoon. Our shareholder letter and a presentation to accompany this call are available on our Investor Relations website at ir.aurora.tech, and were furnished with our Form 8-K filed today with the SEC. On the call today are Chris Urmson, Co-Founder and CEO; and Richard Tame, CFO. Chris will provide an update on the progress we have made across the key pillars of our business before we open the call to Q&A. A recording of this conference call will be available on our Investor Relations website at ir.aurora.tech shortly after the call has ended. I'd like to take this opportunity to remind you that during this call, we will be making forward-looking statements. These include statements relating to the expected performance of our business, future financial results and guidance, strategy, long-term growth and overall future prospects. These statements are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected or implied during this call. In particular, those described in our risk factors included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, filed with the SEC on March 11, 2022, as well as the current uncertainty and unpredictability in our business, the markets and economy. You should not rely on our forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. All forward-looking statements that we make on this call are based on assumptions and beliefs as of the date hereof and Aurora -- excuse me -- and Aurora disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements, except as required by law. Our discussion today may include non-GAAP financial measures. These non-GAAP measures should be considered in addition to and not as a substitute for or in isolation from our GAAP results. Information regarding our non-GAAP financial results, including a reconciliation of our historical GAAP to non-GAAP results, may be found in our shareholder letter, which was furnished with our Form 8-K filed today with the SEC and may also be found on our Investor Relations website. With that, I will now turn the call to Chris.

Thank you, Stacy, and welcome, everyone, to Aurora's first quarter 2022 business review call. Our first quarter was a strong start to 2022. We achieved critical milestones, we continued to advance our technology, and we extended our partner ecosystem, providing us with solid momentum continuing into the second quarter. We are pleased to share our progress as we continue to work toward developing the Aurora Driver for deployment at scale with our first priority being commercialization of our autonomous trucking product. We're continuing to make meaningful progress operationalizing our commercial trucking product. We are seeing broad demand to apply our technology and strong customer interest in the lanes we have identified in our initial rollout plan. During the first quarter, we began our collaboration with US Xpress aimed at crafting and the deployment strategy and system integrations to enable US Xpress to introduce and efficiently manage Aurora Driver powered trucks in their business. We also brought 2 new terminal sites online in Fort Worth and El Paso and established the technological and operational infrastructure to support commercial operations on this route. This effort supported the launch of our pilot with Werner Enterprises, one of the 5 largest full truckload carriers in the United States on the Fort Worth to El Paso lane. Aurora Driver powered trucks are now autonomously hauling freight under the supervision of vehicle operators weekly on behalf of Werner. The Fort Worth to El Paso lane represents the middle leg between Atlanta and Los Angeles, which is one of the busiest commercial thoroughfares in the U.S. Route to El Paso a route is also extremely demanding for truck drivers. It's more than 1,200 miles round trip that takes approximately 18 hours to complete. I experienced this route firsthand back in March when I joined our vehicle operators…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Tom White with D.A. Davidson.

Great. First off, I just want to say thanks for the added video to the slides. I found that really useful and helpful to visualize what you guys were talking about. Just one high-level question for you, Chris. On the state of, I guess, talent acquisition right now in the autonomous driving space. Just curious how that's been going for you? How is Aurora differentiating versus other companies in this space kind of trying to hire people with very specific talents and backgrounds? And just curious kind of what are the most important criteria that candidates are looking for, I would imagine, compensation is kind of the primary. But how else can you guys ensure that you get the people that you really want? I'm also curious how the stock -- the fact that you guys are now a public company, how that maybe helps you guys?

Yes. So thanks for the question. Acquiring talent continues to be critically important to us. As we think about our key differentiators, it’s our people, our technology, our partnerships and our go-to-market strategy. And what we found with as we approach candidates, is that they kind of get it that we have a strong, healthy culture at the company that people enjoy being part of, that they get to work with exceptional peers, and they get to work on a mission that matters. And they believe that we’re on an approach that’s going to be successful. And so we’ve – we continue to be in a competitive hiring environment, but have had success in bringing – continuing to bring great talent into the company. When I think about how do we position ourselves to – for those folks. My philosophy is that, first, you need to have a mission that makes sense and is exciting and important and speaks to people. And then you need to surround those people with that opportunity and teammates that they enjoy working with and then you need to pay them enough that they’re not embarrassed, right? And the first one is kind of why you get up in the morning and it’s the thing that gets you through the tough days, right? That mission, that purpose that you feel and what we’re doing with the Aurora Driver, and what we’re building here, I think, speaks to so many people that opportunity to improve safety. That opportunity and improve the efficiency of supply chains and move the economy forward. I think it’s just a very important mission being part of the next generation of transportation. And then the second part is as important that the people you work with you enjoy and that the work you do is on a day-to-day basis is interesting because it doesn’t matter how good the mission is. If every day sucks, then you’re not going to spend your time there. And then finally, compensation obviously matters. People take a job to get paid as part of it. And so we like to make sure that we are able to compensate people in a competitive manner. And I think we’ve been successful with that. Certainly, part of the calculus of becoming a publicly traded company was to enable us to be competitive with compensation packages and equity for employees that some of our competitors that are part of larger organizations were able to kind of offer.

Our next question comes from the line of Mark Delaney with Goldman Sachs.

First thing, thank you for the data on interventions and construction zones, I thought it was helpful. I'm hoping to better understand, do you think that example is generally illustrative of the progress that's being made on hard problems? Both in terms of the magnitude of improvement you're seeing and over that type of duration. And then if we could take that rate of progress and then magnitude of progress is set further, could you talk about what difficult situations are left to prove upon before you can deploy in late 2023? And what gives you the confidence of getting that done on time?

Yes. Yes. So we wanted to share that example because it is an area where we had been particular focus on development and that we thought it would be educational for folks to understand that when you talk about a feature, it's not really one feature. There's a collection of elements that build into it and know how people understand how that those different sub-elements unlock performance over time. So yes, we're excited about the progress there. We do expect there's sub-elements of what we'll build that we'll continue to see rapid advancement as well. Some of the things that we're working towards. So one we've shared is that we're working towards this fail safety, the fault management system, the implementation and demonstration of that capability. We think that's a really important element of the vehicles being commercially ready. So most of the time, we talk about all of these kind of sexy machine learning, computer vision type problems, which are obviously important. We have a bunch of brilliant people working on those, but to actually have a commercially viable product, you need to be able to deal with when the system breaks in some way. And that's what fault management is all about. So whether it's sensor fails or a fault in an algorithm somewhere the vehicle handle that and respond in a way that keeps everyone safe. So that's a major effort that we're undertaking right now, and we look forward to demonstrating. We're working on things like dealing with emergency vehicles. That's one of the other significant areas that we're putting time into.

That's very helpful, Chris. And my second question, maybe for both of you is on the cash use for the year. Cash was a little bit less than I was expecting in the quarter, which is good news. But maybe talk a little bit more, if you could, around what kind of cash you should expect in 2022. And any thoughts around potentially raising capital.

Yes. Thanks, Mark. Again, as we said last quarter, as a pre-revenue company, we don’t believe giving financial guidance is meaningful. So we’re not going to talk about what we think we’ll spend in 2022. Because of that, we ended March with $1.5 billion of cash and short-term investments on the balance sheet. And we still believe that, that’s sufficient to get us through commercialization and into 2024.

Our next question comes from the line of Steven Fox with Fox Advisors.

Chris, I was curious what you think about some of the news flow out of the last week or so from -- I don't know if I can call them competitors, but sort of self-driving peers that are focused on ride-hailing whether it be Mobileye or Waymo. The -- I guess my takeaway was that the theme was that there's a lot of operational activity in certain cities, especially San Francisco, as you've probably seen. And not saying that this makes your strategy wrong or anything like that but how do you view that as sort of what the market is going to look like for you easier or harder when you do move into ride hailing in a few years? And I know your strategy is different than some of these guys, but seems relevant.

So first, I think it's exciting to see the progress that's being made, right? I think that fundamentally, this technology is important for road safety. I think it's important that the U.S. is a leader in this technology. And so it's great to see folks making progress here. I also believe that the space is extremely large, right? We're talking about something that in the U.S. is more than $1 trillion opportunity in the long term or a $1 trillion space to operate in. And so we see a huge, huge potential there, and it's going to be large enough that there's going to be room for more than one player. And it's extremely early innings, right? We are somewhere in the pre-Model T phase of self-driving. So it's great to see the progress being made. We think that the strategy we're taking is the right one, this entering through trucking, where we see much -- a very clear demand, we believe it's going to be easier to scale operationally the business there and the economics we think are stronger than in ride-hailing. That will generate, we hope, we anticipate meaningful cash flow and that will allow us to build the business and go after these -- the ride hailing opportunity over time. The fact that we're entering from the high-speed segment of the market, we think is partly because we have a technology others don't with our FirstLight Lidar capability that unlocks that opportunity. And so we'll be entering different markets in a different way than what we see today with the low speed kind of trucking entrants. So it's exciting to see, it's not surprising to see, and we think it's, like I said, kind of great that folks are making progress, but it doesn't really kind of shake our belief in the approach we're taking.

Great. And then just on driver shortages. Obviously, you went to extreme levels a few months ago. Uber was talking today about maybe an easing in driver shortages. Just to confirm, have you guys seen anything that sort of shakes your belief in the need for -- or just rather just the trend towards just the trucking industry not having enough driver availability over a long period of time?

Absolutely not, right? The driver shortage has been particularly acute over the last little while because -- as we're all aware, but this is a decade-long trend and there's no reason to believe that it's abating in any way. Whether it's gone from kind of the neighborhood is on fire to your housing on fire kind of level of demand unclear, but it's a fundamental shortage that we don't see anything changing there. And Richard, I don't know if you have anything, do you want to...

No, I think that’s exactly right, Chris. That’s what we’re hearing from the partners. I think the partners and the potential customers are still very excited by the technology, want to get it launched and work with us towards getting in there.

Our next question comes from the line of David Vernon with Bernstein.

So first question for you, Chris and then I have a follow-up for Richard. As you think about launching the trucking product in late 2023, can you give us a sense for how many trucks you expect to be putting into commercial operation at that time? And where you are in the discussions with your OEM partners around more production-ready vehicles?

Yes. So we're anticipating a scale of around 20 vehicles as part of that initial launch at the end of '23. We've been working closely with our partners at PACCAR, our partners at Volvo in their vehicle development programs to work towards time frames that are compatible with that.

Okay. And I'm just assuming those will be fully subscribed when they -- when you go out, it's going to be like we're launching these 20 trucks with these customers? Or is it going to be kind of these trucks are available on for-hire basis? Just so I can kind of understand kind of what the launch is.

Yes. So as we've been talking with customers, and we have an exciting ecosystem of customer partners, we've been taking kind of a 3-step approach with them. So the first has been one where we've got kind of initial indication -- nonbinding, let me be clear, initial indication of demand from them given the intended rollout and the lanes that we expect to operate on. We will go back to them at some point with kind of more clarity on exactly the lanes and the timing and they will then provide -- we provide a kind of an allocation to them. And then ultimately, we'll turn that into Phase 3 of binding demand. Today, we have more demand through 2025, then we have ability to supply.

Okay. That's helpful. And then, Richard, coming back to you for a second. I'm not going to press you for guidance, but I would like to understand the collaboration revenue line, it looks like the -- you pulled forward the balance of the Toyota revenue or there was just more in there than you were expecting? Is there additional revenue we should be expecting in the balance of this year? Or have you kind of exhausted that collaboration agreement with Toyota?

Yes. So we'd expect to have more collaboration revenue going forward. We haven't exhausted all of that yet. That was more recognized in Q1 2022 than we had previously thought. And that's because one of the initial milestones was that we would have 12 vehicles delivered, and then we decided we worked with Toyota and we decided that 8 Siennas was the number that we needed, that [Mustang] got achieved earlier because there was less vehicles and thus, because of the accounting standards, we recognized more revenue. So we do expect the revenue -- there's $150 million of revenue that we'll earn over the period. So we have some more to come on the revenue side, but we have more cash to come than revenue to be recognized because of the way that, that works. And we expect to get another $52.5 million from Toyota over the coming quarters.

Yes. So $52.5 million is the number over the remainder of the year?

That's cash.

Okay, as far as revenue?

Yes. The revenue is -- I'm sorry?

I'm sure it's less than that -- you just mentioned it was less than the cash number, but I'm just trying to get a sense of...

Yes, for sure. Yes, we recognize the revenue in cash. Yes.

Okay. I can follow up with you, maybe after the call, just to kind of figure out what that number is.

Thank you.

Ladies and gentlemen, we have reached the end of the question-and-answer session. This concludes today's conference, and you may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation and have a wonderful day.