Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by and welcome to the Avista Corporation Second Quarter 2020 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participant lines are in a listen-only mode. After the speakers’ presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that today’s conference is being recorded. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to hand the conference over to speaker today, John Wilcox, Investor Relations Manager. Thank you. Please go ahead, sir.

Good morning, everyone and welcome to Avista’s second quarter 2020 earnings conference call. Our earnings were released pre-market this morning and are available on our website. Joining me this morning are Avista Corp.’ President and CEO, Dennis Vermillion; Executive Vice President, CFO and Treasurer, Mark Thies; Senior Vice President, External Affairs and Chief Customer Officer, Kevin Christie; and Vice President, Controller and Principal Accounting Officer, Ryan Krasselt. I would like to remind everyone that some of the statements that will be made today are forward-looking statements that involve assumptions, risks and uncertainties which are subject to change. For reference to the various factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in today’s call, please refer to our 10-K for 2019 and 10-Q for the second quarter of 2020, which are available on our website. To begin this presentation, I would like to recap the financial results presented in today’s press release. Our consolidated earnings for the second quarter of 2020 were $0.26 per diluted share, compared to $0.38 for the second quarter of 2019. For year-to-date, consolidated earnings were $0.98 per diluted share for 2020, compared to $2.14 last year. Now, I’ll turn the discussion over to Dennis.

Well thanks, John and good morning, everyone. We hope everyone is staying safe and healthy during these uncertain times. It’s hard to believe that we’ve been managing through the COVID-19 pandemic for five months now, and every day I continue to be inspired by how our employees continue to rally on all fronts to respond to the crisis. I couldn’t be more proud of how we’re staying vigilant and adapting across the organization, to the new policies and procedures that can quickly change in the states where we serve. I appreciate their patience, their persistence and professionalism, as we all navigate through these uncharted waters to seek out our new normal, all while still providing the energy that is so essential to our customers. As always, our top priority is to preserve the health and safety of our customers, our employees, contractors and our communities. As the regional economies across the areas we serve, move forward with fits and starts we’re doing our best to support those customers who we know are struggling. You may have seen recently, the Avista Foundation provided more than $500,000 to support 37 different organizations throughout our service area. And so far in 2020, our Foundation has provided more than $1.5 million to help those in need. Although that majority of our employees are still working from home, it hasn’t impacted our ability to complete important work across our business. Wildfires continue to be an important topic for our industry in our company, especially this time of year, before the wildfire season arrived, we enhanced our 10-year wildfire resiliency plan to expand our current safeguards for preventing, mitigating and reducing the impact of wildfires to help minimize the possibility of wildfires and their related service disruptions. Our teams spent the last year developing our plan…

Thank you, Dennis and good morning, everyone. I have big news for you, hockey is back. I’m very excited about that the Blackhawks, because of the pandemic made the playoffs. And we’re currently one-one with Edmonton with a game tonight. So those on the East Coast it’s a 10:30 game but I’d like you to stay up and route for my Blackhawks. For the second quarter of 2020, Avista Utilities contributed $0.26 per diluted share, compared to $0.32 in 2019. Compared to the second quarter of 2019, our earnings decreased due to lower electric utility margin and from higher power supply costs and decreased loads related to COVID-19 which was partially offset by rate relief and customer growth. We also had lower operating expenses in the second quarter of 2020. The energy recovery mechanism in Washington with a small benefit in this year of $0.4 million compared to a much larger benefit in 2019 of $6 million. For the year-to-date, we recognized a pre-tax benefit of $5.6 million in 2020 compared to $3.5 million in 2019, all with respect to the earth with respect to the ERM. With respect to the COVID-19 impacts on our results, we recorded an incremental $3.3 million of bad debt expense for the year-to-date. And we expect the incremental amount to be $5.7 million for the full year, including the first half, as compared to our original forecast. In July, the Idaho Commission issued an order that allows us to defer certain costs net of any decreased costs and other benefits related to COVID-19. During the second quarter, we deferred $1.1 million of bad debt expense associated with this order. Compared to normal in the second quarter, our loads, there was a decrease of approximately 6% on overall electric loads, which consisted of approximately 10%…

And now, we will open up this call for questions.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Richard Ciciarelli with Bank of America. Your line is open.

Hey, morning. How you guys doing?

Hey.

Morning, Richie.

Morning.

All right, just had a question about how you’re thinking about positioning the rate case filing in Washington coming out of the pandemic and balancing the customer rate impact, especially given the backdrop of the Puget Sound decision where attrition adjustments were denied. Do you see an opportunity there for a multi-year rate plans or attrition adjustments still to be implemented by the Commission? Or is there an overall sense of a rate fatigue?

Hi, there. This is Kevin Christie. Thanks for the question. Yeah, we’re still compiling our case and putting together all the information taking into consideration the impacts of COVID-19 and, of course, the Puget case. And I’d say it’s too soon to say for sure, we’re contemplating a multi-year plan. But I can’t say that we’re going to file one until we get all our data together and the case in the better shape, and then we’ll be able to let you know.

Okay, got it. That’s helpful. And then just around your CapEx program. You reiterated for 2020. But you had some commentary that the economic activity can potentially impact this. I’m just curious how you’re thinking about the puts and takes there of that spending profile? And is that wildfire resiliency spending that you mentioned earlier included in this program? Or is that not yet baked into the $405 million per year?

So a couple of questions there, Richie. With respect to, you know, we continue to monitor supply chain and those impacts, but as we mentioned, we have seen some disruption but not enough to make us believe that we won’t be able to achieve our capital spending for 2020. And then as we look at the wildfire resiliency plan, we are looking at it currently as if we will fit that into our $405 million of expected capital spend over the next few years, and we’ll constantly reevaluate that, but at this point, we expect it to be part of that $405 million that spent.

All right, got it. That’s very helpful. Thanks guys. That’s all I had.

Thanks, Richie.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from Sophie Karp with KeyBanc. Your line is open.

Hi good morning, guys. How are you?

Good morning, Sophie.

Good morning.

Couple of questions from me. Firstly, loss on equity investments. Could you remind us what those are and how should we think about that going forward?

The equity investments?

Yeah.

Our other businesses?

Yeah, yeah, exactly.

Yeah, so our other businesses – we have investments in a number of different small businesses that are really energy related. The largest amount of our other business investments really are two fund investments in Energy Impact Partners and they invest in a lot of other businesses as well. So, you know we also have an investment in a restaurant and we own the steam plant, which is in downtown Spokane, and a number of other small businesses that are legacy businesses that have valuations that the steam plant, that restaurant, is really at this point shut down you know we anticipate the ability possibly to reopen in the future, but we don’t know that for sure, we’ve put that off for now. So, we have just a number of equity investments. And then, as we mentioned, as Dennis mentioned in his remarks, the Catalyst Building and the Morris Center for Innovation, those are also equity investments in two different buildings, again, here, located in Spokane.

Got it. So that’s basically that mostly, I guess the restaurant and other COVID impacted business that drove the devaluation in the second quarter?

No. The second quarter, we didn’t really have as much of a change there. As the biggest impact to our other businesses during the first quarter.

Okay.

And Energy Impact Partners did have some lower valuations. But again, it wasn’t a significant –

All right. And then my second question is, I guess, when we think about future CapEx, right and you mentioned that the sustained, I guess, economic distress might impact that. And I think we understand how those situations work out. My question is, is there a way to reframe this conversation with your regulators in a way, where this is infrastructure work that can actually help jobs recovery? It’s something that’s happened in some other space, right, where the regulators actually want the utilities to propose some infrastructure work that may lift the unemployment rate. So, I was wondering if that could be an opportunity for you as well to frame those conversations in this way to make sure that your CapEx program stays intact?

Well, I think the way we position the CapEx program is it’s important work to maintain the safety and reliability of our infrastructure and our systems to serve our customers. I mean, that’s our main goal is to be able to serve our customers with the energy they need. And so, you know we have focused our you know discussions with our regulators as that’s how we’re spending our dollars, is we have to identify each of those projects when we go in for a rate case and say why this is important to provide benefits for our customers. An ancillary benefit, yes, is that we do you know maintain employment for people. A number of those are our own employees and there are some contractors that also work on our construction as well. But we haven’t really identified that as additional, you know this is within our expected capital plan. It’s not necessarily adding additional jobs. It’s just not having more jobs reduce. So, I don’t think we can pitch it necessarily as we’re adding additional jobs. We’re just protecting the jobs that we have and our contractors have by continuing to deploy this capital, which does benefit the economy and does benefit the service territory in which we you know live and serve.

Got it. All right, thank you. Appreciate your comments.

Okay. Thank you, Sophie. Operator, any other questions?

Thank you. And I’m currently showing no further questions at this time. I’d like to turn the call back over to John Wilcox for closing remarks.

I want to thank everyone for joining us today. We certainly appreciate your interest in our company. Have a great day.

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today’s conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.