Good day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to AeroVironment's Fourth Quarter and Full Fiscal Year 2025 Earnings Conference Call. After the speakers' presentation, there will be a question and answer session. To ask a question during the session, you will need to press star 11 on your telephone. Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Director of Investor Relations, Denise Paccioli.

Thank you, and good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to AeroVironment's Fourth Quarter and Full Fiscal Year 2025 earnings call. My name is Denise Paccioli, Director of Investor Relations for AeroVironment. Before we begin, please note that certain information presented on this call contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements involve many risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations. Further information on these risks and uncertainties is in the company's 10-Ks and other filings with the SEC, in particular, in the Risk and Forward-Looking Statements portions of such filings. Copies are available from the SEC, on the AeroVironment website, or from our Investor Relations team. This afternoon, we also filed a slide presentation with our earnings release and posted the presentation to the Investors section of our website under Events and Presentations. The content of this conference call contains time-sensitive information that is accurate only as of today, 06/24/2025. The company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. Joining me today from AeroVironment are Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Mr. Wahid Nawabi and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Kevin McDonnell. We will now begin with remarks from Wahid Nawabi. Wahid?

Thank you, Denise. Welcome, everyone, to our fourth quarter and fiscal year 2025 earnings conference call. I will start by summarizing our quarterly and full-year performance, followed by Kevin, who will review our financial results in greater detail and provide guidance for fiscal year 2026. I will then provide a summary of our key messages, and finally, Kevin, Denise, and I will take your questions. Please be aware that our fourth quarter and fiscal year 2025 financial results do not include any financial activity from the Blue Halo acquisition, except for pre-closing deal and integration-related expenses. I'm pleased to report that once again, we have achieved another record fourth quarter and full-year results, exceeding our expectations while positioning us for even greater long-term profitable growth. We had an incredible year, marked by robust demand for our innovative solutions, which enabled us to achieve double-digit organic revenue growth and a significant increase in profitability. Our investments in all business segments helped drive demand for our products, which led to key domestic and international wins and enabled us to launch three new groundbreaking products this year, namely the P550, the JUMP 20X, and the Red Dragon. Now I would like to highlight our key messages for fiscal year 2025, which are included on slide number three of our earnings presentation. First, we achieved record fiscal year revenue of $821 million, which is 14% higher than the prior year period, and record fourth quarter revenues of $275 million, which is 40% higher than the prior year period. Second, in fiscal year 2025, we secured $1.2 billion in total bookings, underscoring the robust demand for our innovative and battle-proven solutions. Third, we ended fiscal year 2025 with a funded backlog of $726 million, which is 82% higher than the prior fiscal year. Fourth, we…

Thank you, Wahid. Today, I will be reviewing the highlights of our fourth quarter performance during which I will occasionally refer to both our press release and earnings presentation available on our website. Just a reminder that we closed our Blue Halo acquisition on May 1, so the results for Q4 and FY 2025 do not include any financial activity from Blue Halo except pre-closing deal and integration expenses. We ended a record year with a record quarter in terms of revenue and adjusted EBITDA. This is the third consecutive year we've met or exceeded our initial annual revenue and adjusted EBITDA guidance. This has been challenging in terms of quarterly year-over-year comparisons. But it's gratifying to end the year with a strong fourth quarter and achieve our annual goals. I'll briefly comment on our results for the quarter and the year, and spend a bit more time providing some guidance for FY 2026, since the financial landscape of the company will change significantly. As Wahid mentioned in his remarks, we ended the year with a record $275 million of revenue in the fourth quarter, which represented a 40% increase over the prior year. This completed a record year at $821 million in revenue, which represents 14% growth despite the challenges of reduced revenues to Ukraine. Ukraine revenues in FY 2025 end up being at 18% of total revenue for the year. And 12% of revenue in the quarter. We expect U.K. revenue to be less than 5% in FY 2026. However, it should be noted that we continue to receive orders for upgrades to their Puma fleet and for Switchblades. It's interesting to note that 52% of the company's revenues were from international customers of which a little over 24% came from non-Ukraine European customers. We continue to demonstrate…

Thanks, Kevin. Before turning the call over for questions, I would like to reiterate the incredible positive momentum we've achieved while entering fiscal year 2026. First, we achieved record fiscal year '25 revenues of $821 million, which is 14% higher than the prior year period. And record fourth quarter revenues of $275 million, which is 40% higher than the prior year period. Second, in fiscal year 2025, we secured $1.2 billion in total bookings, underscoring the robust demand for our innovative and battle-proven solutions. Third, we ended fiscal year 2025 with a funded backlog of $726 million, which is 82% higher than the prior fiscal year. Fourth, closed our acquisition of Blue Halo, further strengthening our industry-leading position as the next-gen defense tech prime. With an all-domain portfolio of innovative solutions across air, land, sea, space, and cyber, will align to our customers' highest priorities. And fifth, we are confident AV is better positioned than ever as a result of important company milestones we achieved throughout the fiscal year, and we're setting our fiscal year 2026 revenue guidance between $1.9 billion and $2 billion. Our decade's worth of investing in autonomous systems has paved the way for our industry and we will continue to lead with best-in-class solutions that are aligned to our customers' needs. We are encouraged by the current administration's ambition for deploying defensive assets our warfighters desperately need, and we stand ready to deliver as we have always done. We're honored to support the most critical defense missions of our nation, at this pivotal moment. I want to thank our employees, shareholders, and customers for their continued commitment to AV and our mission. We would not be in the position we're at today without them. Together with Blue Halo, we're poised to seize these incredible opportunities ahead of us and we're excited to realize the benefits from adding their capabilities across space technologies, counter UAS, directed energy, electronic warfare, and cyber solutions to AV's existing robust portfolio. And with that, Kevin, Denise, and I will now take your questions.

Thank you. Star one one on your telephone and wait for your name to be announced. To withdraw your question, please press 11 again. Our first question comes from Louie DiPalma with William Blair. You may proceed.

Wahid, Kevin, and Denise, good afternoon and congrats on closing the major acquisition.

Thank you, Louie.

For Wahid, the fourth quarter demonstrated pretty robust Switchblade growth. Can you discuss your view of the army's announcement of their transformation initiative that came out last month and the report that the army wants to outfit combat divisions with more than 1,000 drones? And can you discuss that in the context of how the army has already ordered thousands of switchblades from AeroVironment and thousands of Pumas in the past? And so do you view this army transformation initiative as incremental to what you've already provided for them? Thanks.

Thank you, Louie. Yes, first of all, we are very, very pleased with the results that we delivered on the fourth quarter, setting another record for the quarter as well as for the year. Not only in our overall business, but as you in the loitering ammunition. I mean, that business is growing rapidly. And on the fourth quarter, we grew over 83%, as you saw. And another key figure that's really important is that throughout fiscal year 2025, not only do we book a record $1.2 billion worth of new orders funded that funded funded bookings, but the LMS business or segment alone booked close to $477 million in contract awards. And it's a variety of mix of customers, some for the US Army, some part of the Replicator initiative, of The US, the Pentagon, international customers, about eight of them. So far. And all of that means that we have tremendous momentum with our LMS business. Going forward. We expect that business to continue to grow. Specific to your question related to the U. S. Army's robotics or transformation, General George, has made a very clear statement and so has the secretary of the army. That they would like to shift and modernize the US Army. And there is significant upside. And the key areas that they would like to modernize and transform the US Army One of them is related to loitering munitions, drones, counter UAS and counter drones, directed energy, and RF jamming capabilities such as our Titan solution set from Blue Halo. So if you look at the priorities of the US DoD and its US Army, AV is positioned incredibly well. Not only do we represent more than two-thirds or three-quarters of The US duties priorities and the army's priorities, we also are very unique because we have the capabilities that we can deliver today. We've got we have the production capacity to deliver as to make them. And produce them at scale, which we've done in the past. And our systems are battle-tested and proven. So my so the short answer is yes. We expect additional incremental opportunities. Details of that are not well known yet. But I think the momentum is very much on our back. And I think the loitering ammunition business is going to continue to grow. That also includes counter UAS in the army transformation too.

Great. That makes sense. And another question. You guys discussed the very strong foreign military sales pipeline and how I think you are shipping the Switchblade to eight countries, and you're involved in negotiations with another eight. And, some investors are wondering, was there a write-down in the unfunded backlog? And was that write-down related to foreign military sales and the different policies under the new administration?

No, Louie. The answer is no. We did not have any write-downs related to our LMS business or FMS sales. And our on our financials this quarter. At all. The LMS business is doing great. We have a lot of momentum behind it. We continue to work with more and more countries and allies who want to get Switchblades into their hands of their warfighters. And I believe the opportunity is just beginning, and that trend is gonna continue over several years in the future. We're positioned very, very well, but no write-downs related to LMS business in the fourth quarter. Well, unfunded backlog converts to funded backlog during the period. So that's right.

Okay. Yes. Investors were just wondering on a sequential basis the total backlog adding funded and unfunded went down significantly. And so was there any write-downs in terms of or was just everything just unfunded converted to funded and then there was the revenue. Burn associated with the backlog.

No. I mean, like I said, it really just was a conversion of the unfunded to funded orders during the period. Revenue. And if you know, Ruiliu, if you recall, earlier this last fiscal year, we had nearly a $1 billion sole source IDIQ for the US Army that I mentioned in my remarks. And when as the U. S. Army places orders, firm pundit orders against that, It converts from unfunded to funded backlog. And so that dynamic has been occurring for the last few years. And we explained specifically that multiyear IDIQ award from the US Army for nearly a billion dollars is specifically intended to achieve that because they would like to make sure that we easily can put things on contract convert them into funded backlog. And we're going to continue to see more orders in the future for our loitering munitions in fiscal year 2026.

Okay. Great. And one last one if I may. Is there still significant market opportunity for the P550, and can you just discuss the broad market opportunity for both the P550 and the Red Dragon, which I don't think have generated any revenue for you yet. But seem to have significant potential for fiscal 2026.

Yes. So, first about the P550, as I mentioned in the remarks, we introduced three groundbreaking products two of which you just mentioned, and the third one is the JUMP 20X Group III UAS. On P550, we expect that product to do extremely well. We're positioned really well. The US Army has announced multiple programs at least two one of which were expected to be down selected and receive an order for essentially the next two quarters. And that's our LRR program of record potentially, which is worth about a billion dollars by itself. Besides that, the international demand for P550 has been tremendous. So far. There's a lot of need. There's a lot of interest in it. We expect to book our first initial order most likely from an international customer, this first quarter or the next quarter after that. So we expect the P550 to do very well. It is a very large market there. Is a growing demand. And let me just remind everyone again that the P550 is an incredibly capable solution. It is incredibly disruptive. The economics of it, they multi-payload and multi-mission aspect of its features, uniquely positions it to be a very competitive offering. We feel very good about the P550. In regards to the Red Dragon, we actually do have some revenue. It's part of our McCready Works so far. But in the future, it'll be reflected as part of our segment one that I described under the precision, munitions, and fires. We do have initial revenue, but that product is expected to do really well long term. It's just at the early stages. It is a capability that is highly differentiated. And there's a lot of interest in that capability. And not only domestically, but also internationally. So we feel actually really strongly, really well, as I mentioned in my remarks, in all of our three new products that we launched. We believe that in the next two to three years, these products will generate hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars, if not billion-dollar plus worth of backlog for our company to execute against going forward.

That's excellent. Thanks. Thanks, Wahid. Thanks, Kevin.

Thank you, Louie.

Our next question comes from Greg Conrad with Jefferies. You may proceed.

Good evening.

Hi, Greg.

Maybe just to start with a clarification on the revenue guidance. If I look at the bottom end of Autonomous and space, it adds to the $1.09. But if you look at the upper end, autonomous at one four, space cyber, at point eight, it adds to $2.2 billion. Is that conservative? Is there any type of intercompany elimination? Just kind of what drives that lower end lower than the two segments?

I mean, these are obviously ranges of potential outcomes. I mean, we don't operate with large programs of record. You know? So you know, if things go the right way, they'll be at the higher end of the ranges. And if you know, in business in general, some areas go better than others, and others overperform and underperform. So there's obviously opportunity to hit them both at the higher end of the range. But in terms of the total, we've taken some, you know, judgment on the totals.

And then, you know, it's been a little bit less than two months of ownership with Blue Halo. I mean, I think that the guidance excludes some of the potential expenses and amortization. Did you include anything in the way of either revenue synergies or cost synergies in terms of the '26 outlook?

We as we put in the S-4, we had some cost synergies projected. We'll be able to achieve those, but obviously, you don't get the full benefit of those until for the full year. And as I said in my remarks, we'll begin to realize that throughout the year and kinda hit our original, you know, 10 plus million dollar target for the first year. We in some ways, have some revenue synergies, but it's gonna take some time for those to fully play out. Before we can put those into our forecast and guidance and things like that. So we're still early days here. But there's lots of opportunity, lots of excitement about the things we can do together. But we haven't had a chance really to start monetizing that in our forecast.

And then maybe just last one for me in terms of the 70% visibility coming into the year, I think you mentioned that's above where you typically guide. Can you maybe talk about the drivers of that? Does Blue Halo have higher visibility? Did you take a more conservative route in terms of guidance? What kind of drives that higher visibility into 2026 at 70%?

Well, the visibility is similar between the two segments. There is when you look at the space cyber, and directed energy segment, particularly on the cyber side, they operate off of longer-term contracts with task orders. So there's somewhat more visibility on those. It's not reselling every quarter for them. So have ongoing relationships there. That we, you know, forecast them in our revenue. But other than that, it's pretty much the same. They're very similar in terms of percentage of visibility.

Thank you.

Thank you, Greg.

Our next question comes from Peter Arment with Baird. Yeah. Good afternoon, Wahid, Kevin, Denise.

Hey, Peter.

Hi, Peter.

Hey, guys. On the just kind of focusing on the guidance, I guess, in the individual segments. When you look at Autonomous, you know, the year-over-year kind of growth ranges is quite wide from the kind of the pro forma number that you provided, the 14% on the lower end and 33% on the higher end. Wahid, is it just assumptions around what potential LMS volumes can be at Switchblade? Or maybe first orders for P550. What are some of the kind of key drivers that, you know, affect the lower end of the range and the higher end of the range?

Really, Peter, it has to do primarily with the US DoD contract and timing of these contracts and awards. That drives a lot of that range, the spread of the range. So we are ready. We have the capacity as a company. We've been you know, one of the key differentiators that we have is our ability to turn around and convert backlog or orders into revenue. That is one of our key competitive differentiators and also have the ability to scale quickly and produce that mass and volumes. However, what we can't really predict effectively, which is really difficult in the entire industry, is how does the US DOD funding and budgets the congressional approvals, and all of that works out its plays out and eventually makes it into a contract to us. So those are the primary reasons for the range of outcomes and the spread of that range within essentially both segments, but more acutely into our autonomous systems segment. Overall, we feel very strong because if the timing of congressional approval of the budgets and the signing of the president's budgets and the DOD converting it into contracts happens in a timely manner, we could have a significantly strong year but it is too early to predict that. And, we're just getting started. What really wanna work on is long-term consistent double-digit profitable growth which is, you know, a great position to be for us. Given the backlog and the opportunity that we've developed.

Yeah. That's helpful color. And then just on you mentioned the budgets. Just have you had a chance to evaluate kind of some of the key Blue Halo portfolio programs, how they've stood up under the budgets. I know the directed energy solutions and the SCAR program, certainly have gotten a lot of attention recently.

Absolutely. So, you know, we've purpose-built our company from the ground up. To be ready for this moment, I call it. You know? This is our moment. We have an incredible opportunity in front of us. We represent more than two-thirds of the Secretary of Defense's priorities. If you look at any documents from congress, from the National Defense Strategy, from the administration, or from the Pentagon, you will see and all from almost pretty almost all the services, and the co comms, you will see that the categories that we play in and we lead and we have the ability to deliver in scale our categories that is important to national security. And what are those? Drones. Counter drones, direct energy, laser communications, space communications, electronic warfare, All of these are things that and one way attack. These are the categories that we, in many cases, invented or were the leader in. And so we're positioned very, very well in those categories. And I think that we have many years of very strong potential performance and value creation opportunity here in front of us.

Appreciate that, Wahid. I'll jump back in the queue.

You're welcome, Peter.

Our next question comes from Ken Herbert with RBC Capital Markets. You may proceed.

Hi, Wahid, Kevin, and Denise. This is actually Steve Strauss on for Ken Herbert. Congrats on the closing of Blue Halo, but it was hoping you guys could dive a little further into the FY 2026 outlook. How much of the revenue is stemming from the organic legacy, AVAV versus Blue Halo? If you can give some color back.

Well, I think we tried to provide the pro formas in the guidance. So you can see on that, I think it's Slide 10, we show the pie chart with the different revenue levels for the different product groupings. Those are the pro forma FY '25 revenues for each of those groupings. So anything all the growth that we're forecasting is off of those pro forma revenues. And so you're looking at over 20% growth to the midpoint of the autonomous systems group. And over double-digit for the space, cyber, and directed energy group.

Okay. That's helpful. And then maybe just as a follow-up, can you maybe discuss the profitability of the two segments? You guys have previously used to give like either adjusted operating income or gross profit across the two. Should they be about the same, or is there a different way to kinda think about each of them?

Well, I think we're not really giving guidance on the breakout of the, say, adjusted EBITDA. Those that will be reported. On a quarterly basis for each of the segments. But I would say, as I said in my remarks, you know, that the AXS segment is very similar to the existing AV business in terms of its profitability profile. So that's one half I'm giving you.

Fair enough. And then maybe if I could just ask one more just in terms of the free cash outlook for the year. I don't think I saw this part of the guide. Should we assume that it's maybe similar to FY '25? I can appreciate that there's a lot of moving pieces here.

Well, we definitely have some opportunities on the working capital front as I outlined in the script, and we're very hopeful that we actually generate some cash on working capital this year. We do have a fair amount of capital expenditures expected for the year. But we're looking for a positive cash conversion this year versus last year. And that's all because of the fact that we're growing, and we're making sure that we invest in the areas that allow us to continue to grow and capitalize on these very large opportunities in the future. We are deliberately investing, and as you could see from our track record, the areas that we invested, whether it's R&D or capital, actually panned out and delivered incredible good value and created value for our company. So I think we want to continue to do that because we're in a very, very good position to capitalize on these opportunities.

Thanks, guys. Sounds good. I'll, hope I connect you.

Thank you.

Our next question comes from Andre Madrid with BTIG. You may proceed.

Hey, Wahid, Kevin, Denise. How are you guys? Thanks for taking my question.

Hello there.

You know, we're seeing now it's looking like NATO might move to a 5% GDP spending pledge. Given how much of a sizable portion of sales international's becoming specifically amongst NATO customers, I mean, what's your initial assessment on what the impact of this 5% pledge could be if it does get moved through?

Andre, that's an excellent question. We believe that, as we mentioned in my remarks and in Kevin's remarks, we already do quite a lot of business internationally. And we continue to see more and more demand for our systems primarily in Europe, but beyond Europe, even in Asia Pacific as well. The world, unfortunately, is not a safer place than we all wish. There's lots of challenges. There's lots of conflicts. The recent wars and attacks you've seen is basically put an exclamation mark on what you can do with the type of capabilities that we're the leader in. And all of that equates into a very, very large seismic shift in demand and opportunity for us internationally. It's gonna take some time, going to continue to invest in being more present in Europe. As you know, we already have a subsidiary in Germany, we have a legal entity as well, and parts of Europe, but we wanna continue to expand there to capitalize on this. The reason why we feel more even bullish on this is because we're uniquely positioned to be able to deliver. Most of these countries wanna spend these dollars quickly, because they lack these capabilities today in mass and volume. Our systems are battle-proven. And tested. They work. They have seen its effectiveness. And they trust our company in delivering these systems for decades. And so I think we're incredibly positioned well to be able to capitalize on this opportunity because we can deliver at scale, and we are trusted in what our solutions do work. So I think that's gonna be a trend you're gonna continue to see in essentially all of our products, not just on our loitering munitions, but our nonlethal drones on our counter UAS solution set, on our direct energy solutions, even our space communication technologies has incredible opportunities ahead of it in the space domain globally and internationally, especially with European countries.

Got it. Got it. Super helpful. Moving, I guess, to Red Dragon, Wahid. I know we've spoken on this one. Could you maybe just break down a little bit more about what that TAM looks like? I know with Switchblade, you guys have approval to sell to 50 allied nations, but I remember our conversation, it seems like those same restrictions are not imposed on Red Dragon given the ITAR regulations at play. I mean, maybe just provide some more detail if possible.

Sure. So as you all know, we introduced Red Dragon just a few couple of months ago. We do believe that it's a category that we're the lead player that is growing incredibly fast. As part of these one-way attack drones, you know, an autonomous and autonomy capable solution set. In a degraded GPS environment or degraded communication environment is gonna be very key. We believe the market for that is well over a billion. The data is quite difficult to get, but we can I can tell you that this market, the one-way attack drone category should be equal, if not bigger, than even loitering munitions as a whole. So we believe that this product is gonna continue to expand. And you're correct. The foundational level of the Red Dragon solution set is a commercially developed product on our own IRAD, that we do not have ITAR restrictions. Obviously, if we were to put specific payloads or communication devices in it, would become subject to that. But internationally, we can export the base unit quite easily. And it is designed to be modular so where the payload and the warhead could be actually even integrated outside the US with a domestic supplier internationally. And we feel very good about it. It's gonna take some time, but we believe that that product is gonna be a significant driver of growth for us in the long run.

Got it. Got it. Wahid, that's super helpful. I'll leave it there. Thanks so much.

Thank you, Andre.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Pete Skibitski with Alembic Global. You may proceed.

I guess, just to go down the CapEx route, on the 6% to 8% guidance on the cloud build-out, is that a one-term or one-year type of a thing? Should we expect CapEx to go back to the kind of that 2% to 3% range in the future after this cloud build-out?

That note meant to that it includes cloud capitalization. It's not all cloud build-out. It's really the normal range of facilities, equipment for manufacturing, and to a certain extent, software systems and things like that. So that includes all of that. We expect it to probably trend down over time. But at the same time, we have tremendous opportunities in front of us. So I'm not gonna make any predictions at this point in time.

Yeah. So, Pete, just to echo what Kevin said, we have several, several very serious large growth potential opportunities in front of us. Let me just name a couple of them. The space communications, the space force is really, really behind, and upgrading the entire satellite command and control and communication network that The US relies on. We have won that program of record. It's worth about a $1.7 billion program. Program funded through the congressional budget documents. We can scale that and expedite deliveries in the fiscal year '26 and beyond. That's one. Loitering ammunition is another one. We're building another factory to increase capacity up to $1 billion in production. Red Dragon is another category that we believe that we're going to have significant upside coming in the next few years. And then just to name a few other ones, the directed energy space, counter UAS, We are the leading player globally, and we know that we have significant needs in our country and around the world protecting critical infrastructure, refineries, airports, nuclear power plants, or military bases, opportunity for us, and we have the leading solution embassies, you name it. There is an enormous that is deployed, and it's effective in the field. So these are just some examples of areas that we see tremendous upside and potential opportunity for ourselves. And so we have made the decision that we wanna increase because we see that this will play a significant role in delivering more value to our shareholders and our company in the long run.

Okay. No, fair enough. I appreciate it. Just one last for me, just going back to Louis' question on the backlog. Right? So you generated $275 million in revenue this quarter, right? Total backlog declined by a little under $700 million. So the math just indicates there's a little over $400 million that is kind of unaccounted for. Seems like it just kind of fell out of backlog. I think that's what people are trying to kind of figure out there. And any can you give us any sense of what was going on?

No. No programs are canceled. Nothing was canceled.

What highway?

So, Pete, I think what you're looking I'm not sure exactly what number you're looking at, but our backlog is significantly higher at the end of this fiscal year relative to fiscal year 2024, number one. A significant increase because we booked over $1.2 billion throughout the year, and we recognized $821 million in revenue. So that increase helped as well. The unfunded backlog, which is that IDIQ that I mentioned, has converted to funded backlog. You might be looking at the number there. But we will be glad to explain the details more. Our funded backlog from Q3 to Q4 slightly decreased. Slightly. Not much because we also booked a lot of orders in Q4, which essentially, again, backfill the revenue that we shipped in the quarter.

Wonderful. Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Jonathan Siegman with Stifel. You may proceed.

Hey. Good evening. Thank you for taking my question.

Hi, John.

If you know, on booking trends at Blue Halo, we haven't had an update on that since you announced the transaction. Now over six months ago. Can you help us comment on whether things there are going better or less than what you expected? And then you mentioned space cyber directed energy will lag autonomous systems sales growth. Can they keep up on bookings this year?

Jonathan, so we actually feel pretty strong and solid about our expectations for the previous or the former Blue Halo business and their ability to book orders. We have very similar trends within the Blue Halo former businesses, traditional businesses than compared to AV. The only difference I would say is that some of their business related to the cyber and intel are long contracts where a lot of the businesses actually selling very high highly differentiated engineering sort of content to customers. The growth in that business really has to do with how we scale, employees and engineers and people. So it doesn't have these significant higher growth like the rest of our products business. That's one unique difference. On the other hand, they also are looking at very large strategic wins and program and bookings that could be very large, large step function growth opportunities. So for example, in the space, communication and space operations, we have a huge potential there. Laser comms is another one. Directed energy is another one. Electronic warfare as well as counter UAS our Titan solution set is another one. And the trends in the market is such that these are very specific areas that The US duty needs a lot of help. And so the short answer is yes. We expect the Blue Halo business to actually grow and there's opportunities for significant booking increases going beyond fiscal 2025 there as well.

But back to Pete's question on the CapEx. I really love the enthusiasm you had for lots of opportunities to increase and invest in these really exciting areas. Are those on the in the future? Or are you already accelerating CapEx plans this year? Because it does seem like your guided CapEx is higher than what you had in the S-four. For the combined business.

That is correct, Jonathan. We already initiated some increases in CapEx in the fourth quarter. Most of that is going to show up in our financials fiscal year '26. That's why the percentages are higher in '26. And it's related to both of our businesses and lots of different products. As I mentioned, the areas are space communication, directed energy, counter UAS, loitering munition, a one-way attack, those are the key areas and also unmanned systems. Is another area that we're investing to scale primarily because we see opportunities coming our way. Let's keep in mind that one of the reasons why you've been able to actually capitalize on the growth and these opportunities is that our ability to be able to deliver quickly. And have the production capacity. We're uniquely qualified in this area. Than other competitors who are either in the prototype stage or very early even trying to build a facility to make their initial low rate initial production. We're not in that category. We have battle-proven systems with capacity today that could that needs to scale even further. Those are the areas, Jonathan, that we expect that to continue to grow. Obviously, we don't expect that to stay forever. But we're only providing you figures for the fiscal 2026, and we will provide more color as we go forward and beyond fiscal 2026.

Thank you. And good? Do have some clarification on the unfunded backlog. During the year, they moved the purchasing of the Switchblades from one purchasing group to another to PEO soldier is where now all of us switchblade orders are coming through. So the Ju On's contract was with the prior purchasing group, and that expired actually on the last day of the year. And they did not renew that one because now everything is gonna be going through the PEO soldier group from here on out. So they'll be likely increasing that IDIQ.

Thank you.

Would now like to turn the call back over to Denise for any closing remarks.

Thank you once again for joining today's conference call and for your interest in AeroVironment. As a reminder, an archived version of this call, SEC filings, and relevant news can be found under the Investor section of our website. We hope you enjoy the rest of your evening, and we look forward to speaking with you again following next quarter's results.

Thank you. This concludes the conference. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.