Please stand by. Our presentation will now begin. I would now like to turn the floor over to Vince Keenan, Avnet's Vice President of Investor Relations. Vincent Keenan - Vice President & Director-Investor Relations: Good afternoon and welcome to Avnet's Second Quarter Fiscal Year 2016 Business and Financial Update. As we provide the highlights for our second quarter fiscal year 2016, please note that in the accompanying remarks, we have excluded certain items, including intangible asset amortization, restructuring, integration, and other items, and certain discrete income tax adjustments from all periods covered in our non-GAAP results. When we refer to constant currency or the impact of foreign currency, we mean the impact due to the translation in foreign currency exchange rates when translating Avnet's non-U.S. dollar-based financial statements into U.S. dollars. When we refer to organic sales, we have adjusted the prior period to include the impact of acquisitions and exclude an estimated impact of the extra week of sales as our first quarter fiscal 2016 included 14 weeks compared to historical quarters which contain 13 weeks. In addition, when addressing return on capital employed, return on working capital, and capital velocity, the definitions are included in the non-GAAP section of our press release. Before we get started with the presentation from Avnet management, I would like to review Avnet's Safe Harbor statement. This call contains certain forward-looking statements which are statements addressing future financial and operating results of Avnet. There are several factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. More detailed information about these and other factors is set forth in Avnet's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In just a few moments, Rick Hamada, Avnet's CEO, will provide Avnet's second quarter fiscal year 2016 highlights. Following Rick, our…

Thank you. Our first question comes from Ananda Baruah from Brean Capital.

Hi. Thanks, guys. Good afternoon. Thanks for taking the question. I guess what I would just love to have if we could is a little more context around some of the softening dynamic that you mentioned both in TS and EM particularly in the Americas and then in Asia as well. And then how long do you think that the firmness in EMEA can sort of continue as well? Just sort of like a couple of next level dynamics behind the drivers that you saw. Thanks. Richard P. Hamada - Chief Executive Officer & Director: Yeah. Ananda, this is Rick. I'll actually turn it over to Gerry and Patrick for some regional color on a group basis. The EMEA question we anticipated, we know that's been a sustained regional story that's very positive and continue to get questions every quarter, but I would start with an acknowledgement that our components team continues to execute very, very well in a tough market there. And of course, the recovery story, multi-quarter recovery story going on with TS EMEA to add to that has been adding up to some exciting results there, somewhat muted when it gets translated, but on a local currency basis, very excited there overall. For the overall softening, what we saw, it was very regional with the Americas, but I'd say, generally speaking, two different types of causes. For EM, it was much more about a general softening in the industrial sectors particularly with depending on whose PMI you follow. I think for both November and December, there were successive downgrades on PMI. For TS, it was more about a little bit of a late quarter surprise with the final closure on the pipeline that we had identified, as well as some particular sub-stories where software and services continue to grow, yet hardware particularly in the storage systems area kind of stood out to us as one of the areas of surprise. But let me ask Gerry and Patrick to add. Gerry?

Sure. Ananda, this is Gerry. Starting with the Americas, we were below seasonality in Q2 really, as Rick said, due to broad overall weakening in what I would call the mass market. And our bookings weakened throughout the quarter. This has actually strengthened in January to get us over parity at this point. If there was any bright spots in the market, for us, they were automotive and mil-aero, but those were not anywhere near enough to offset the core industrial weakness we saw. Book-to-bill, again, has strengthened during the current month, and we are projecting seasonal sequential growth in the Americas, but that's coming off a lower base, of course. And I would say, at this point, visibility is just not that robust due to lead times being short. Our customers know they can pick up the phone and order. So, we're not getting a lot of future visibility there. When it comes to Europe, again, I would echo Rick's comments. Our European team has really been performing quite well. I think in Europe, they started quantitative easing much later than they did in the Americas. So, overall, the market is performing well, and I think we're performing well in that market. So, I would also like to give a round of applause for our EMEA team and their execution there. Just overall, as Rick talked about the PMI and ISM data, if you look at our served markets, we think we've got low-single-digit growth going forward, and if there's any bright spots in the markets for us going forward, we're still very excited about IoT and embedded. So, Patrick, I'll turn it over to you for TS.

So, for TS, what happened at the end of the quarter, we were a little bit surprised by, I would say, some softness in closing deals on storage. And to be very specific, it's legacy technology storage. In fact, if you look at the next-generation technologies like converged, hyper-converged or flash arrays, we grew very nicely, double digits, in some cases even high-double digits. So, here, we see traction. But unfortunately, the positives are, were not enough to offset the decline on the legacy storage technology. In EMEA, so we have market conditions which for the moment remain positive. I will just add that companies had delayed investments because of the sluggish market environment. They have a better visibility now, so they have to invest and they're investing. So, that's helping the market. In addition in that market, we continue to execute very well. I mean, we've made some management changes. And so, all the regions are now in – within Europe, all the regions are nicely recovering. We have some record results in some of the regions like Eastern Europe and Northern Europe. Central Europe continues to develop very well. And Southern Europe, which was an issue for us, is now turning around.

That's really helpful. I appreciate it. Thanks for the context.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Will Stein from SunTrust.

Hey. Thanks for taking my question. I'm wondering if, as happened once or twice in the last few years, rebates were any issue in TS in the quarter, and then I do have a follow-up. Richard P. Hamada - Chief Executive Officer & Director: Yeah, Will. I think the short answer is no because frankly, if there had been some anomalies there, it probably would have more impact on the operating margin expectations. And as you can see there, there was some nice expansion year-on-year despite the softness. So, Patrick, do you have...

Well, I'm... Richard P. Hamada - Chief Executive Officer & Director: Patrick would like to add something.

Maybe just to add one more thing, so as you know the rebates from, okay, every supplies purchase program has got its focused list of products. And of course for us, I mean, we are paying a lot of attention to the product mix to maximize the rebates, and that's exactly what happened this quarter again. We've been able to perform well, whether suppliers are putting their focus and so to maximize their rebate.

Great, and then a follow-up, if I can. On TS, of course, naturally the concern longer term is something that you seem to have seen this quarter where the legacy products had a problem selling in the more current or newer technologies are doing better for you and with transition to cloud infrastructure, investors are, of course, concerned that perhaps what you saw in this quarter is an acceleration of a trend that could continue for some time. I'd love to hear sort of the discussion as to what the company is seeing in the market and then what it can do to anticipate or react to that trend. Thank you

So, we have been anticipating that trend. In fact, since many quarters already, we are investing in the next-generation technologies. Just to mention one, is hybrid cloud. Okay. We just launched our cloud marketplace. We had bought before companies specialized in cloud orchestration, and we have just finished creating practices for each of the next-generation technologies to come to market and support our partners with innovative solutions. So, we've seen the trend. We are anticipating the trend. Indeed, it's a question – okay, it's the crossover. Are we going to see fast enough the traction on the next technology to compensate for the decline on the legacy technologies? I would say, so far so good, as you can see from our results. Despite the decline in sales, we've been able, thanks to better margins and good cost management, to maintain the profitability and even to increase it in constant currency. But yes, there is a market change. We've recognized it. We've made the investment and we are making the investment to be very well positioned on the next technologies and take advantage because, in fact, those new technologies we believe are going to create a lot of good opportunities for us and profitable opportunities because our vendors are going to reward us better on selling those technologies. Richard P. Hamada - Chief Executive Officer & Director: And Will, this is Rick. I'd echo. We have been adjusting. I agree with Patrick 100%. We continue to monitor closely and make sure we're staying close to the developments. And perhaps I'm going to be a bit of historian here, but I would tell you, from a TS change management perspective, I see a lot of similarities to what's going on in this transition from legacy stores to the new technologies, similar to what I think TS faced as the world moved from proprietary service to more industry standard. So, it's not an exact copy of the playbook but I think there are some similarities that give us some ideas to make sure that we stay in tune with this transition.

Thank you.

Our next question comes from Lou Miscioscia from CLSA.

Okay. Great. Just sticking on the question of margins for a second. Maybe if you could give us some idea as operating margins I guess going forward for both groups. I mean do you think that TS now – I mean understand obviously that it is seasonal. But is TS now taking a bit of a step-up higher and getting into your 3.4% to 3.9% bracket? And maybe a comment also on the EM side, since that was obviously a little bit lower than expected. Richard P. Hamada - Chief Executive Officer & Director: Yeah. Lou, this is Rick. I would tell you, I think our consistently communicated expectations is that as we continue our progress towards our hopefully well understood target ranges and op margin by the group, it is reasonable to expect that we are looking for year-on-year progress in op margin from the groups as they progress to their target ranges. So, when you're thinking about the way we're planning and executing and developing a response to the marketplace for our businesses, that's the evergreen goal we keep in mind. Gerry, any other particular comment on EM margin expectations, or?

Sure. So, this is Gerry. We will expand our op margins in the March quarter sequentially, given the decrease of our high-volume supply chain engagement this quarter causing a mix shift back to the west and the work that our teams are doing with expense management given the current environment we're in. With the weakened Americas and Asia market, we are going to be challenged to get to the 5% goal this fiscal year, but we do believe that our current action plans will get us back in a trajectory to achieve the 5% goal in FY 2017. Historically, the March quarter is about 20 basis points to 30 basis points up from the December quarter, and we expect that trend to continue. But we're not going to claw back all of that from a year-over-year perspective.

So for TS, as of today, we are on plan in terms of improving our operating income percent. I would say that all the regions and all the business units are contributing to those improvements. For the next quarter, we have again planned to improve our operating income percent year-on-year as we continue to execute on, I would say, portfolio management. So, going after the product mix and the customer mix which is a little bit richer in terms of GP percent and, of course, continuing on working on efficiencies and productivity.

Okay. One follow-up, on the TS EMEA side of things, when you look at the year, which was obviously better than expected, given I guess the impression that the European economy stayed weak, you can understand the reason why. How long can that last in the sense of now, for Europe, on the TS side, all of tech has a tougher year-over-year comp. So, do you think that as spending there will be flat year-over-year? Do you think that given the underspending for x number of years that you could still see growth again this year? Richard P. Hamada - Chief Executive Officer & Director: Hey, Lou. It's Rick. I'll jump in. I think this is the point in the call where I typically give my disclaimer that we are not economists or forecasters here over the long term. What I would tell you is that the best guidance we can give you is what's reflected in the March quarter guidance as a starting point. I would also tell you that when we get to April and report on the March quarter, we may have a little more insight here because I do think the first calendar quarter of the year can give some clues as to what people are thinking for overall IT budgets and spending in a calendar year, being as we just finished the calendar and budget flush overall. So, as much as I'd like to give you an opinion, it's really beyond our scope to try to give a call for the year here right now. But as you can that we built into the TS guidance sequentially, we are at the higher end of what would be normal seasonality, at down 16%. And that information, obviously, was baked into that expectation.

Okay. Thanks, guys. Good luck on the new year. Richard P. Hamada - Chief Executive Officer & Director: Thanks, Lou.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Shawn Harrison from Longbow Research.

Hi, everyone. I'm going to beat the dead horse and go back to TS. I guess the sales shortfall of $250 million, I understand the secular headwind in traditional storage but the question I have is, do you believe you underperformed the market particularly in the Americas in the quarter? And then secondarily, what is the sizing now of the computing components business, knowing that it looks like it's going to be another rough year for HDDs and microprocessors?

So, a few answers. Firstly, we don't have yet network share figures, so difficult to comment if it's market related or if we have lost share. The only thing I know is so we dropped in storage, but we grew on all other product families. So software, services, servers, networking, we grew year-on-year single digits. So future will tell. So, we are going to make the analysis, of course, as soon as we have the figures if it is market-related or if it's our performance. That's all. Storage was one of the issue. The other thing is we grew – our product mix is changing, and it's going more and more towards more services and more software. And this is an area where, I mean, we are, I would say, from an accounting standpoint, net treating some of the conversions of that. So that is also an impact on the top line, not on the margin, not on the profitability, but on the way we report then the revenue. The third thing which happened in the Americas is Latin America was a little bit softer than expected. Currency was one issue, and then we had some difficulties in Mexico, okay? So, I would say three main reasons for the decline in the Americas, or I would say, the gap versus guidance. Richard P. Hamada - Chief Executive Officer & Director: Yeah, Shawn, I would add, I think there have been a few notes published regarding some data from VAR surveys which indicate there were – there was a good year-end budget flush experienced by many of them along the way. I would also add that TS America has historically been a very strong and top performer among our overall portfolio. And as Patrick said, we will actually – we'll get the facts and make sure we're getting an objective view on this overall. But an initial expectation is that a top performing team didn't have a major stumble here on execution is a big contributor to the quarter. And then your question regarding the total size of eight, computing components now, it's now hovering just under 10% of TS Global revenue.

Okay. And then as a follow up, I guess maybe could you just discuss the appetite for the buyback, I know historically your appetite has increased and maybe that was evidenced by what's been purchased in your quarter-to-date as the valuation's gotten closer to book value. But has anything changed in how you view the buying the stock when it's close to book value in terms of increasing the appetite? Kevin M. Moriarty - Chief Financial Officer, Senior VP & Controller: Shawn, hi. It's Kevin. And, I think for those of you that have been following us for a while, our approach remains the same and consistent. When we look at our internal projections, we're going to continue to follow our disciplined approach and when we get closer to intrinsic value, obviously, we accelerate the amount we're buying, but we do look at our forward internal projections and have a schedule in place that we buy against. So nothing has changed in terms of our approach.

Okay. Thanks, Kevin.

Our next question comes from Brian Alexander from Raymond James. Brian G. Alexander - Raymond James & Associates, Inc.: Okay. Thanks. Good afternoon. Going back to the EM weakness in industrial, I'm not surprised that you saw that, but it seems like maybe you saw it later or at least at an accelerated pace later than many of your suppliers who have talked about weak industrial for many quarters and we've seen weakness in a lot of the industrial OEMs. But now some of those suppliers are pointing to more stability. So help us understand the disconnect there and maybe why you're seeing more weakness now when they saw it earlier.

Yeah. Brian, this is Gerry. Yeah. I think you're correct. We actually did see softening happen late into the quarter in both the Americas and in Asia. I think – again, I can't talk about the difference between our suppliers' business and our business. Some of it has to do with where they're focused from a market perspective. But if you think about the size of our customers versus the size of the customers they deal with direct. So China, for example, our sales dropped off in China and part of it was liquidity in China for our customer base where maybe some of our suppliers don't feel it, that given the size of the customer base they're dealing with. So, it's like, two quarters ago when we were counter to what the suppliers were saying, again, it has a lot to do with segment focus and things like that. But it seems like now, to your point, we saw weakness late into the quarter where some of them have seen industrials start to pick up again. Brian G. Alexander - Raymond James & Associates, Inc.: Okay. And maybe just two quick ones. For TS, for the revenue outlook, given the weakness that you just saw in the December quarter and the weak close there, just curious, why guide that to the high end of seasonal – for the March quarter? Was there anything on the backlog side that gives you confidence there or why high into seasonal? And then just for Kevin on DSOs, why were they up three days year-over-year if the quarter wasn't backend-loaded? Thanks. Richard P. Hamada - Chief Executive Officer & Director: So, Brian, I'll jump in first. Yes, on the TS revenue outlook, despite the fact that our fiscal quarter closed on January 2, we were a little surprised that some of those late bookings actually moved in to be Q3 billings. And so, a little bit of that crossover on a fiscal boundary is part of the reason that we're at that higher end of sequential seasonality. Kevin M. Moriarty - Chief Financial Officer, Senior VP & Controller: And Brian, on the DSO, if you break down our geographic revenue mix during the quarter that was really the main contributing factor on the DSO. Brian G. Alexander - Raymond James & Associates, Inc.: Okay. All right. Thank you very much.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Sherri Scribner from Deutsche Bank.

Hi. Thanks. Rick, I think I heard you say that you thought the markets overall were going to grow in the low-single digits this year. I just want to make sure I understood that correctly. Because I'm trying to understand, if I look at your business, the guidance for March suggests you guys are down 6%, 7%, and I know there is some currency in there. But why would your business not be growing that much, are you losing share or what's happening? Richard P. Hamada - Chief Executive Officer & Director: Yes, Sherri. I'm not sure exactly what data point in time. Maybe it's going back to the Analyst Day in June when I tried to – I think I was trying to illustrate that according to the forecasters, I think I showed global semiconductor growth and then trends in IT spend. And if we look at 2015 now, in early 2015, I believe the forecasters said global semis would be up 4% to 5% for the calendar year. It kept coming down, it kept coming down, it kept coming down. And I believe I saw a report by one of the forecasters in January that global semis were down 1.9% for calendar 2015 now. So, if you're referring back to our Investor Day, I think I was trying to paint the picture of some of the growth trends being forecasted in the overall marketplaces. And if that was the data point by the way, I think six months, seven months has definitely brought a change in the air, so to speak, with some of those outlooks. Just like we had the conversation earlier about making sure we understand what's going on a relative basis in the network shares for TS, we'll be of course doing the same for EM on a regional and breakdown by supplier basis, make sure that we're understanding that as well, but I do think that even some of those data points I showed from an overall market growth perspective have been adjusted since mid-2015.

No,

Sherri, I...

...it wasn't related to something you said before. It was the question in the EMEA segment when you were talking about EM business. In part of the Q&A earlier, you said low-single-digit market growth going forward.

What I said, Sherri, was that the analysts show our server TAM growing low-single digits. So, I would point out is, yes, our EMEA business is growing in constant currency, but if you look at it in dollars, so it's reduced. Also, what I would really point to and I think Rick's made the good point, analysts have projected a growth, but as you said, last year, they projected it was going to be 4% and it wound up being minus 1.9%. So, what I would point to is our March quarter guidance really as what our current thoughts are on growth.

On the overall market growth?

Well, I would say the Avnet TAM, server TAM growth for EM.

Okay. And then I guess my – yeah. Richard P. Hamada - Chief Executive Officer & Director: And, Sherri, I'm sorry. It's Rick. Just one more thing. When you're looking particularly at the total revenues for EM, also remember there's some anomalies there because of the high volume engagements in Asia and some of the differentials in the growth rates in specifically that part of EM's revenue. So, sometimes you'll hear us in some of the script if you take a look at the transcript, you'll see us talk about growth rates in the core for EM versus the high volume engagements as well. And sometimes when you look at EM in total, some of the distortions there can cause you to scratch your head a little bit when you look at the market rates.

Okay. That's helpful. And then I wanted to ask a little bit about the different FX impact in the EM business versus the TS business. It seems to be a bigger impact for TS. And I'm trying to understand why there's that delta between those two. It's probably structural. And how should we think about FX impact going forward? Thanks. Kevin M. Moriarty - Chief Financial Officer, Senior VP & Controller: Hi, Sherri. It's Kevin. I would actually point to, if you were to break down geographically certain emerging markets that have really experienced weakness in the calendar fourth quarter, we have a higher percentage of revenue for the TS business in those markets versus EM. And that's really what I would point to. Richard P. Hamada - Chief Executive Officer & Director: Australia, too. Kevin M. Moriarty - Chief Financial Officer, Senior VP & Controller: Yeah. Richard P. Hamada - Chief Executive Officer & Director: Emerging markets, for sure, but even in Australia, TS is a much larger revenue than EM.

Sorry. We have Latin American also. Richard P. Hamada - Chief Executive Officer & Director: Right.

And what would you expect the impact to be going forward? Kevin M. Moriarty - Chief Financial Officer, Senior VP & Controller: That really depends on the movements from here. Things seem to have been recently stabilizing since the end of the year, but it really depends on movements from here, Sherri.

Okay. Thanks.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Jim Suva from Citi.

Thank you and congratulations, especially on the year-over-year operating margin improvements. My question is on that, and I'll also ask my follow-up at the same time, is when you look ahead, given the overall deterioration or pause in the markets, should we expect operating margins company-wide to face some headwinds and not be able to grow year-over-year or grow year-over-year? Because you mentioned some initiatives you're doing in your different segments and (43:01). But then when we bring it back to the company total-wide, you also have overhead of headquarters there. So if you can help us – again, it looks like you've been making two years in a row of operating margin improvements. Should we expect that trend to continue company-wide or start to pause out or from macro factors? And my follow-up question is on the stock buyback. You had mentioned that you're looking more aggressively at it. Factually speaking your stock buyback has been relatively consistent the past quarter or two. And so, I think your comment, I assume, was how you mentioned in January month-to-date that you've accelerated the stock buyback and should I think about that as kind of a more going forward statement as opposed to the reported December quarter? Thank you. Richard P. Hamada - Chief Executive Officer & Director: Yeah, Jim. It's Rick. Let me start with the buyback, then I'll back into margins here, too. When you say we've accelerated the buyback, you got to understand it's not really a conscious decision where we changed our approach. We have a standing schedule in place and what we tried to connect was with the recent market pullback, I mean, even before today's call, in rough numbers, I believe we're down about 7% from January 1 to today. And based on our disciplined…

Got you. And then on the rebates, you'd mentioned that things look pretty normal there. The question is, is normal good enough? Meaning, if we've seen a big pause here, do rebates need to be renegotiated for you to continue to meet your operational profit goals, just because the big pause we're seeing here in the market, especially what you saw the last few days of the quarter. Richard P. Hamada - Chief Executive Officer & Director: Yeah. Jim, this is Rick. I'm very proud of the way that the TS team is managing their mix, and rebate is a more impactful on the profitability of the business. Again, with the year-on-year progress and the full-year progress at TS, I think that speaks for itself. TS has a revenue issue that is more important at this point than whether or not the revenues we've got have the appropriate rebates. So, I think they're demonstrating their focus on profitability is paying off. I'm not overly concerned – you can't take anything for granted and we've got to manage it carefully, and we will. But I think despite the revenue shortfall, the continued margin expansion gives you confidence. We've got a good job going on there, and I think growth on the top line as well as managing these transitions, as we talked about earlier, such as the move to more newer technologies and third-platform technologies versus some of the legacy technologies. I think those are more strategically interesting right now as to how quickly we're adapting and moving for those transitions.

Thank you. And congratulations to you and your team there at Avnet. Richard P. Hamada - Chief Executive Officer & Director: Thank you, Jim.

Our next question comes from Steven Fox from Cross Research.

Thanks. Good afternoon. Just first question on the Avnet Advantage cost savings. Can you give us a sense of where those cost savings are in the segment breakdown, how much did you get from TS this quarter versus EM in corporate expense? And then looking at the $60 million new target, where is the bulk of the incremental new savings expected to come by fiscal year-end? And then I have a follow-up. Richard P. Hamada - Chief Executive Officer & Director: Sure. Kevin M. Moriarty - Chief Financial Officer, Senior VP & Controller: Hey. It's Kevin, Steve. What I would point to is in the most recent quarter, I'd say 60% from TS and 40% from EM. Go forward, I think if you reflect back on what we shared at our Investor Day, I would point a higher percentage coming from TS. But both operating groups are very focused on the program and are contributing, but it would probably be in the same 60%-40% range as we move forward.

Okay. And then, I'm sorry, just a clarification on this because you've talked about all the great performance at TS the last couple quarters. Is that 100% related to Avnet Advantage or is some of that separate from what's going on with that program? Kevin M. Moriarty - Chief Financial Officer, Senior VP & Controller: No. Much more than that. Obviously, over the last calendar year, very focused on portfolio actions, revenue management, a lot of focus areas that Patrick's been bringing some discipline into the organization. Some help from Avnet Advantage, but a lot of other actions that are being ongoing within the operating group.

Great. That's helpful. And then just as a follow-up, on the embedded business, since you've mentioned industrial weakness, I'm just curious if that industrial demand weakness affected your embedded business during the quarter, and can you give us sort of a quick overview on the prospects for that business for 2016 now that you've made those management changes? And, that's it from me. Thanks.

Yeah. This is Gerry. Great question, Steve. Yes. It also had at the – the market had an impact on the embedded business. And as you've said, we just named Ed Smith to be the full time leader of that business, but we're very encouraged by it because we think particularly as our suppliers continue to consolidate, they're very interested in distributors who can sell solutions and embedded is a big strategy for us to be able to sell solutions going forward. So we do believe it provides us both better than core market growth and better margins over the long-term.

Great. That's very helpful. Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Matt Sheerin from Stifel. Matthew Sheerin - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc.: Yes. Thanks. Wanted to ask a few questions regarding the inventory, up year-over-year despite the lower revenue. You talked about some of the puts and takes there including the fact that you missed revenue in the high volume business and also it sounds like there was some strategic inventory build. But given short lead times, are you expecting inventories to come down on a dollar basis despite the fact that essentially you're going to be sort of flattish to down a little bit on the component side in revenues?

Yeah. Matt, this is Gerry. Our inventory was down 5.6% sequentially so I think we're adjusting our inventory based on the market realities that present themselves. Inventory was up 10% year-over-year and that was really due to much less velocity, as you said. We saw the velocity in the high volume fulfillment engagement slow particularly in December so that created a different dynamic for us and if you look at what drove the year-over-year difference, it was that because, remember, last December quarter, we hit a high watermark in our high volume fulfillment engagement and the velocity was quite high. So, that's the main difference if you look at our inventory on a year-over-year basis. The balance of the inventory we have, we believe, is appropriate to support core demands and I would expect inventory to be flat to slightly down sequentially. Matthew Sheerin - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc.: Okay. Cause, if you listen to a bunch of the semiconductor and component suppliers that have reported so far, most of them appear to be saying that while distribution and sell-through was weak, getting stable to improving, they're also talking about inventory levels getting back to normal levels. And it sounds like, at least for you guys, you're really not there yet. And I know perhaps there was some outlier reasons particularly on the volume business. And then just also within – in line with that, Gerry, your business also seems to be lagging the semi guys in terms of – by a quarter or so, still seeing relative softness where other guys are seeing a little bit of a bump up. Do you think it's because of the mix of business, you're focused more on industrial, the mid to smaller companies on the component side, or do you think maybe this is the last cut and indeed you may see a recovery going into the June quarter?

So, Matt, let me start with the difference between maybe what we're seeing in the market and the suppliers. So again, if you remember a couple of quarters ago, a lot of our suppliers had negative outlooks, and we had a more positive outlook. And at that time, a lot of that was related to weakness in comms and automotive. And now if you look at what a lot of the suppliers who have been a little more bullish this quarter are talking about, they're talking about improved comms and improved automotive. Those aren't big markets for us. So, I think when it comes to core industrial, we're, that – I think that's the big difference between why we're not as bullish as some of the suppliers who have come out this quarter are. When it comes back to inventory, again, like I said, I think inventory – we took inventory down 5.6% sequentially, and I think it's in line with where we see the business. And we do believe that inventory will be flat to slightly down this quarter. So, I think our inventory as a lot of the suppliers have said, they're starting to see distributor inventory come back in line. And if you take out our high-volume fulfillment business that really from a velocity perspective, kind of came down this quarter, I think that's the big difference when you look year-over-year. Matthew Sheerin - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc.: Okay. That's very helpful. And just as a follow-up, regarding the ERP implementation that's been ongoing, and it looks like in the later innings of that, where we do we stand? And is there any heavy lifting going on the next quarter or two that could cause any issues on top line or distractions?

Well, as you say, we've got an ongoing process for ERP systems. So, we've rolled them out in multiple businesses around the world up 'til now. We are rolling out the ERP in our Americas business here. Our plan is to roll that out – to kick that off in April. So, we're on track. At this point, we don't perceive any issues with that. We don't believe it will have any major impact on our business at this point. And we look forward to getting on that new system to give us some efficiencies that we don't have based on our current old system. Yeah, Rick? Richard P. Hamada - Chief Executive Officer & Director: Yeah, Matt. This is Rick. I would just reinforce, we have a very robust change management plans in place. Over the last three years to four years, we've successfully pulled this off with our computer business in the Americas followed by our computer business in Europe and now moving to the components business in the Americas. So, we take nothing for granted, but it's been two years of planning and preparation, user acceptance testing actually going on right now, and we're keeping very, very close eye on it. We do understand the potential impacts, and we've got a top-notch team with some experience here that we have a high degree of confidence in. So, all systems go, and we'll keep you posted. Matthew Sheerin - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc.: Okay. Thanks a lot.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Mark Delaney from Goldman Sachs. Mark Delaney - Goldman Sachs & Co.: Yes. Good afternoon and thanks very much for taking the question. The first question is on the EM segment. I was hoping you could talk on the margins. Specifically, it looks to me like gross margins came down year-over-year even though the high-volume engagements were lower this year. Maybe you could just help us understand what's driving that and if any of that has to do with either pricing pressure that you're seeing or any sort of impact from the number of semiconductor companies that have been undergoing M&A. Kevin M. Moriarty - Chief Financial Officer, Senior VP & Controller: Thanks, Mark. Actually, our gross margins year-over-year were up in the Americas and were up in our core Asia business if you take out the high-volume fulfillment engagement. Year-over-year, gross margins were down in our EMEA business. And again, we had talked about over sequential quarters of price increases that suppliers put on us that we're passing through to customers over time because we have contracts with them. Sequentially, our gross margins in EMEA actually went up, so we see the improvement in those gross margins. And, we'll continue on that march of improving gross margins in Europe over the balance of the fiscal year. Mark Delaney - Goldman Sachs & Co.: Very helpful. And then for a follow-up question on the TS segment, I was hoping you can help me understand to what extent the company maybe is making growth trade-offs in order to get to these higher margins. Obviously margins were nice in TS this quarter, but organic revenue fell 8% year-over-year. So, maybe you can just talk on that topic generally, and then if you could specifically also size how big storage is as a percentage of TS and how much of the TS revenue is tied to some of these more legacy types of storage that have been causing growth challenges.

So we've done, for about two, so in general, okay, we are now very careful what type of deals we go after. I mean, we are really carefully looking at what's the return, so what's the margin, and what's the return on working capital. So we are really paying attention to it. And the main business unit which has been impacted by that approach has been the component business. So the component business stays dramatically dropped. The main reason, so you have some market conditions, but you have also de-selections from business which was not profitable. So, yes, there is – I would say at the moment, we are paying a lot of attention to profitability to, I would say, build a very sound base for future growth. When it comes to storage, so storage is half of what we had of our hardware business, okay. Not a split between I would say legacy technology and new technology, I would say it's something around 75%-25%; 25% for the new generation, 75% for the old one. And I can tell you that in that space, there's no reason to be selective. I mean you have market conditions, and we want to play fully in that space. It's really more a volume issue. It is not linked to, I would say, a strategy to be more selective. So, I would say the quarter end that surprise was, as far as we are concerned, more market-related and timing-related because in fact, we've been backlogged which, okay, is going to build in the next quarter. But nothing linked to a strategy to deselect business here. There are some other areas of our core data center business where we have been deselecting. Okay. So it's, six months ago, we did a strategic review of our portfolio. And yes, indeed, we decided to deselect some business. Nothing material. For sure, that's contributed to the profitability, but no. So, our component business, absolutely, our core data center business, we are selective. But in storage in particular, I mean, we play completely, we are full in. Mark Delaney - Goldman Sachs & Co.: That's all super helpful color. If I could just ask a quick clarification, of TS, how much is hardware? Richard P. Hamada - Chief Executive Officer & Director: Roughly, 50%. It is just under 50% for December quarter, Mark. Mark Delaney - Goldman Sachs & Co.: Okay. Thank you very much.

And I would just add that – sorry. I'd just add one thing, is the trend is very clear. Hardware is going to become less and less of our total business. I mean, we are really – and especially as the market is moving to cloud and hybrid cloud, it's very clear that software and services is going to continue to gain weight in our total sales which will help us again in terms of margins and profitability. Mark Delaney - Goldman Sachs & Co.: Thank you. Vincent Keenan - Vice President & Director-Investor Relations: Thank you for participating in our earnings call today. Our second quarter fiscal 2016 earnings press release and related CFO commentary can be accessed in downloadable PDF format at our website under the Quarterly Results section. Thank you.