Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for joining us, and welcome to the Third Quarter 2025 Armstrong World Industries, Inc. Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions] It is now my pleasure to turn the conference over to Theresa Womble, Vice President of Investor Relations and Corporate Communications. You may begin.

Thank you, Nicole, and welcome, everyone, to our call this morning. Today, we have Vic Grizzle, our CEO; and Chris Calzaretta, our CFO, to discuss Armstrong World Industries third quarter 2025 results and rest of year outlook. We have provided a presentation to accompany these results that is available on the Investors section of the Armstrong World Industries website. As a reminder, our discussion of operating and financial performance will include non-GAAP financial measures within the meaning of the SEC Regulation G. A reconciliation of these measures with the most directly comparable GAAP measures is included in the earnings press release and in the appendix of the presentation we issued this morning. Again, both are available on the Investor Relations website. During this call, we will be making forward-looking statements that represent the view we have of our financial and operational performance as of today's date, October 28, 2025. These statements involve risks and uncertainties that may differ materially from those expected or implied. We provide a detailed discussion of the risks and uncertainties in our SEC filings, including the 10-Q we issued earlier this morning. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement beyond what is required by applicable securities law. Now I will turn the call over to Vic.

Thank you, Theresa, and good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining our call today to discuss our third quarter 2025 results, the progress we are making on our initiatives to deliver consistent profitable top line growth and our expectations for the remainder of the year. Today, we announced record-setting third quarter net sales and earnings results with strong Mineral Fiber average unit value, or AUV, a second consecutive quarter of Mineral Fiber volume growth and double-digit net sales growth in Architectural Specialties. On a consolidated basis, we delivered year-over-year top line growth of 10%, resulting in record-setting quarterly net sales with robust performance in both our Mineral Fiber and Architectural Specialties segments. Consolidated company adjusted EBITDA increased 6%, while adjusted net earnings per share increased 13%, along with strong double-digit free cash flow growth in both the quarter and in the year-to-date period, allowing for execution across all our capital allocation priorities. This includes the increase in our quarterly dividend of 10% we announced last week, and our latest Architectural Specialty acquisition of a Canadian wood sealing manufacturer, Geometrik. These results were driven by our differentiated and resilient business model, along with solid operational and commercial execution across our enterprise that once again allowed us to overcome lingering market softness and some timing-related cost headwinds. I want to take this opportunity to thank our teams across the company that continue to execute at the highest level that make these consistently strong results possible. So thank you. Like the last several quarters, we have remained laser-focused on operational efficiency, commercial execution and our growth initiatives as we continue to navigate a dynamic and uncertain macroeconomic backdrop. These efforts not only contributed to strong top line growth, but also continue to support our industry-leading profit margins even as we dealt with…

Thanks, Vic, and good morning to everyone on the call. As a reminder, throughout my remarks, I'll be referring to the slides available on our website. And please note that Slide 3 details our basis of presentation. Beginning on Slide 6, we summarize our third quarter Mineral Fiber segment results. Mineral Fiber net sales were up 6% in the quarter, primarily driven by favorable AUV of 6% and a slight increase in volumes. The growth in AUV was primarily due to favorable like-for-like pricing with a modest contribution from mix. The benefits of increased volumes and favorable mix were driven by the strong execution of our commercial sales organization, along with benefits from our growth initiatives. Mineral Fiber segment adjusted EBITDA grew by 6% and adjusted EBITDA margin was 43.6%. Q3 Mineral Fiber EBITDA growth was primarily driven by the fall-through of AUV, contribution from our WAVE joint venture on strong price/cost benefits and slightly higher Mineral Fiber volume versus the prior year. As Vic mentioned, our results were negatively impacted this quarter by some timing-related discrete costs in both segments. In Mineral Fiber, these costs primarily related to an increase in medical claims above our normal run rate, which mainly impacted manufacturing costs. In addition, our strong year-to-date financial performance and updated full year outlook resulted in higher incentive compensation in the quarter, which primarily impacted SG&A. We do not expect the third quarter SG&A results to be indicative of our go-forward run rate. As a result of these in-quarter cost headwinds, Mineral Fiber adjusted EBITDA margin compressed 30 basis points over the prior year. For the Mineral Fiber segment, the total discrete costs in the quarter represented approximately $5 million of an outsized headwind, which is reflected in both manufacturing and SG&A expenses. Excluding this cost headwind, adjusted…

Thanks, Chris. 2025 is proving to be another strong performance year for Armstrong as we've successfully navigated uncertainty at the macroeconomic level and its ripple effect on our end markets. It's been a challenging year to call in terms of the level of market activity. As you all will recall, in February, we were expecting the market to be softer in the first half of the year, given the transition to the new administration and its potential new policies and then a modest pickup in the back half once there was more clarity around what these new policies would be. However, beginning in April and through the second quarter, the macroeconomic outlook became cloudier as the impact of more significant tariffs increased the level of uncertainty, which led us to modestly adjust our volume outlook for the back half of the year. Now sitting here today, we have not seen the anticipated modestly softer market conditions, but rather more of the same of flattish kind of stabilizing market conditions. And we expect these market conditions to continue for the remainder of the year. The Dodge first-time bidding activity data in terms of the number of projects continues to be at lower levels. However, the value of projects being bid overall has increased ahead of inflation and was up nicely in the quarter. A look at actual starts, which reflects how much of this bidding activity turns into actual projects was mostly flat and coincides with the overall market conditions that we're currently experiencing. Looking at specific verticals, a recent research from JLL provides some positive signs for the office market. After 2 years of stabilization and signs of leasing footprints beginning to expand, U.S. office vacancy rates declined in the third quarter for the first time in 7 years. Their…

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Susan Maklari with Goldman Sachs.

Nice job on the quarter, Vic. My first question is, can you talk a bit about the benefit that you're seeing from the new products, how that's helping the mix component of that AUV in there? And also how that's coming through in terms of the strength of quoting and bidding activity that you talked to in your comments?

Yes. Susan, on our mix, we continue to do very well at the high end of our portfolio. The -- even recent years, our innovation around the smoother, wider look, our higher acoustical performance and the combination of the look and the higher acoustical performance is really coming through in 2025 again. We're growing at near double digits at the high end of our portfolio. And again, just really confirms that the technology that we're bringing to the marketplace at the high end and where the products are most specified, which is at the high end is where Armstrong continues to do very, very well with our innovation. That's really on the Mineral Fiber side because that's how we measure mix is at the Mineral Fiber business. In the Architectural Specialty business, although we don't measure mix the same way there because of the custom nature of that business, the innovation that we're bringing to the marketplace in both metal and wood, our turf, our felt products, they're all making an impact driving what as I reported, double-digit orders and backlog growth in Architectural Specialties. And that's really important. The new products are really important there to make sure that we're winning the large renovations and the new construction projects. So really pleased with how our innovation is driving mix in both the Mineral Fiber and the Architectural Specialty business. And again, double-digit growth in our Architectural Specialty business like that, both in orders and backlog is really encouraging because we all know the market is not growing double digits. And so this is a good measure of how well we're penetrating and participating in that market.

Yes. No, absolutely. That's great -- are you there?

Yes, Susan, we can hear you.

Okay. Sorry, I thought I lost you for a second. No, that all sounds really good. And I guess building on that, right, Architectural Specialties is getting close to that 20% margin target that you've had out there. Can you talk about the forward trajectory of that as we continue to see these acquisitions coming through? And how we should think about where that can go over the course of the next year if the environment does stay more challenging like it is today?

Yes. Susan, the -- I'm really proud of how our teams have driven the improvements over the last 4 years really in Architectural Specialties, every year making an impact on operating leverage and doing a great job in the marketplace and pricing our products. And organically, even with some of the timing-related headwinds that Chris mentioned, organically, we're at the 20% level. And we expect for this year for the first time on this side of the pandemic is to get back to that 20% level organically. And of course, so as the base gets bigger in our Architectural Specialty business, organically, we can offset more and more acquisitions as we add them on. As you know, most of the acquisitions we're buying are dilutive until they get scaled up on our platform and then we're able to drive the operating leverage to the 20% or greater. The forward look on this, as we've said very publicly, we think this is a really good spot for us to be as long as we have double-digit growth opportunities in the marketplace as long as we're continuing to penetrate the market and take share, we don't want to optimize on margins at the expense of growth. And so as long as we have that growth curve in front of us, and we do see that ahead of us still for several years, we like greater than 20%, but we don't need to optimize much greater than that at the expense of growth. That's kind of how we're going to run the business.

Your next question comes from the line of Tomohiko Sano with JPMorgan.

My first question is EBITDA margin pressure. So while sales and EPS was strong, both consolidated and segment EBITDA margins declined year-over-year in 3Q. Could you elaborate on the timing-related cost headwinds such as higher incentive compensation and medical costs and how you expect these to trend in 4Q and into 2026, please?

Yes. Chris, do you want to take that?

Sure. Yes. So on the SG&A side, let me just start with just an overarching comment around our mindset around cost control and the continued thinking around employing a cost control mindset even in more stabilizing market conditions that we mentioned in our prepared remarks. So in the quarter, we had highlighted higher SG&A costs in the Mineral Fiber segment, and that was really driven by higher incentive compensation costs. These are related both to our annual incentive plan and our longer-term incentive plan. And the driver of these costs really relate to our year-to-date financial performance and our updated full year outlook that I commented on in my remarks. And I also said we don't expect this third quarter SG&A result in Mineral Fiber to be indicative of our quarterly run rate moving forward. Vic mentioned the thinking around continuing to get leverage on our investments, and that certainly is the case. We look to get operating leverage out of our SG&A investment base, and we'll continue to be mindful of the rate and pace of our spending. Again, the compensation -- the incentive compensation costs were really timing in nature and were an outsized cost in the third quarter. Let me take the second part of your question next around medical and just take a step back a bit and talk about the higher medical costs that we experienced in the third quarter. We're self-insured from a medical perspective. So when higher medical claims are incurred, they impact the P&L directly. And what we saw was an uptick in several high-cost claims in the third quarter, and these claims were above our normal run rate of medical experience. So while we do experience medical costs in the ordinary course, the number and the magnitude of what we saw in Q3 was atypical. It would be very unusual to see that level of medical claims in consecutive quarters as well.

And my follow-up is, Vic, macro end market trends. You talked about office and also on transportation mainly. But could you talk about education, health care and data centers and those kind of vertical into Q4 and 2026 expectation, please?

Yes. The Education and Health care segments continue to be, I would say, stabilized as we've experienced throughout the year. So no real inflection in health care and education that we're seeing. In fact, health care remains slightly positive, both on the new construction and the renovation forecast that we're seeing. So I would say kind of stabilized activity levels in the health care and education. Of course, the data center is -- the opportunity continues to be very robust, and we're very active in participating in that with our new products. We have a new launch of tile products as well as some of the grid products that we've been talking to you about. We're also launching some additional structural grid products to go along to target that marketplace. So it's an exciting opportunity, and it continues to have a lot of growth behind it in addition to what we're seeing in transportation and the green shoots that I'm talking about in office.

Your next question comes from the line of Keith Hughes with Truist Securities.

Yes, I'm here. Okay. A question -- I'm sorry, so these SG&A expenses, it's health care related. Would those most likely come down over the next quarter or 2 to something more consistent with what we've seen in the past? Is that the message you're trying to send?

Yes. I think, Keith, it's fair to assume that both on the incentive comp and the medical side that they'd be kind of more at a normal run rate. Again, very atypical to see the outsized impact that we saw in medical this quarter. And again, that wasn't tied to a specific operation or event. But yes, to your point, not the expectation going forward.

And what's the outlook for manufacturing costs in the next few periods? Or is inflation starting to creep in to the inputs?

Yes. I'd say on the manufacturing side, I mean, for sure, we have inflation, but our ability to continue to drive productivity in our plants remains one of the value creation drivers and building blocks of the business. So I'd expect more of a run rate that we saw through the first couple of quarters of this year. Again, continued strength in both a continued cost control mindset across the enterprise, coupled with our productivity programs and productivity gains.

Okay. And final question for Vic. I hear you what you're saying on the office and the Class C moving to Class A. Has that started to occur yet in quantities that are moving the numbers? Or is office still a lagging category?

Yes, it seems to be a lot of ground level activity, which -- so it's moved from some of the bidding activity and some of the start activity that we've been tracking into what I'm hearing in the marketplace from our regional teams is that there is more tenant improvement type projects on the ground there. So I think we're just beginning to see some of that. So I wouldn't say they're needle movers. It's -- they're real -- it's a stabilized, I would say, vertical at this point and with some green shoots in terms of the improvement that could be out there going into 2026.

Your next question comes from the line of Adam Baumgarten with Vertical Research Group.

Question on the AUV, just on the home center mix. It sounds like that impacted year-over-year mix benefits in the quarter. I know you said it was positive but maybe less so than it's been in prior quarters. I guess do you expect that mix headwind to abate in the fourth quarter? And then if we think about the August price increase starting to flow through, should you see some level of year-over-year AUV improvement in the fourth quarter?

Yes, you're right, Adam. The -- as you know, the retail business is a limited set of products and lower AUV. So when we get some additional strength in one of those -- well, in that channel, you're right, it does drag down the overall mix. I will say we still -- these are profitable products, and they're profitable contributors to our bottom line. So we like that volume. But you're right, on the AUV line, it can be a drag a bit on our normal AUV run rates, and that's what we experienced in the third quarter. We don't expect that to continue into the fourth quarter. I just will caveat that sometimes this is not forecastable in terms of some of their inventory replenishment or even drawdowns as we've reported on in quarters past. But we're not expecting that to continue into the fourth quarter at this stage.

And I would just add on to that and say we still expect a strong AUV quarter in Q4. Again, that was the Big Box that we mentioned in the third quarter kind of pressured the full year outlook, if you will, but still expecting a strong Q4 and about 6% AUV for the full year.

Okay. Got it. Great. And then just switching gears to AS. Just given kind of the strong backlog and order commentary that you made and some level of visibility, especially on larger projects, are you still -- or should we expect growth next year? And maybe any kind of additional color in terms of end markets and kind of what's getting you excited about 2026 at this point?

Yes. I mean what's encouraging, Adam, in our order rate and our backlog build is not just for the rest of the year, which it is contributing to the rest of the year and our confidence for the rest of the year, but how it's building for '26. So yes, we would expect to continue to grow in 2026. Again, almost irrespective of what the market is doing because, as you know, most of our growth there is really through penetration, really taking share. So our expectations and the way it's building in our backlog, we would expect growth in '26.

Your next question comes from the line of Rafe Jadrosich with Bank of America.

I wanted to just follow up on some of the comments on office, which has obviously been sort of a headwind for, I think you guys said 7 years. Can you talk about -- if that comes back or we start to see an improvement, is there any either ASP or margin tailwinds, like particularly either on the Class A side or anything from a regional perspective? And are you seeing like specific green shoots on any like San Francisco or New York? Is that meaningful in any way?

Well, I think what the data is showing now, and I mentioned this in my prepared remarks is how it's broadening out beyond some of the major cities and the Sunbelt, as we've talked about, how the South has been actually an early recovery zone for the office segment. So in addition to that, what the research says it's actually much broader now. In fact, into 18 regions across the country, we're starting to see some positive activity there, both on the leasing front. And of course, that drives the renovation activity in the market. So that's encouraging, I think. As I mentioned earlier, we're still very early into seeing some of this work actually land into the marketplace. But the -- certainly, the signs are encouraging and supported by some of the forecasts that we're looking at as well.

Got it. Okay. And then I understand that like sort of it's tough to give a volume outlook into '26. But wondering if you have any at least directional visibility on cost inflation, AUV, SG&A, any of those points as we think about trends into next year? A just like specific puts and takes?

Yes. Rafe, it's Chris. I'd say at this point, we're still preparing our modeling and going through assessing the market, et cetera, for 2026. But if I could take a step back and just talk a little bit about the building blocks of the business and what we've talked about in terms of AUV growth, our ability to continue to drive productivity and really how we're thinking about SG&A investments and margins next year. I'd say our thinking and the mindset really hasn't changed. I think those value creation drivers are in place. We'll continue to invest and invest back into the business where there are the highest returns. And I think we'll absolutely be thinking about EBITDA growth and margin expansion heading into next year. But absent that, too soon to formulate any more details around the specific inputs of those. But I'd be thinking about the value creation drivers of this business on a relatively consistent basis going forward. Vic, I don't know if you want to add anything more.

I think that's well said.

Your next question comes from the line of Brian Biros with Thompson Research Group.

Last quarter, your outlook was for a slightly softer second half kind of driven by that uncertainty with discretionary commercial work expected to slow. A lot of commentary today around market stabilizing here. Can you just help compare the current outlook to your expectations from 3 months ago, kind of what stabilizing really means in this scenario? And I guess really just what is driving that kind of positive change from uncertain to stable?

Yes, Brian, thank you for the question. It's a good question because if you remember, the way we talked about some of the smaller, more discretionary type renovation activity is where we have the least amount of visibility in the marketplace, right? It doesn't involve an architect and they tend to be, again, smaller in nature. So it kind of shows up through distribution. So -- and really full disclosure of that, we don't have great visibility. And we've been using prior models to kind of predict what happens there because we know because it's highly discretionary, it can move to the sidelines very quickly in higher degrees of uncertainty in the marketplace. We saw that. We experienced that in prior years, namely in 2022. And so with the forecast for the back half of lower economic activity, lower GDP and expecting some of that activity overall in the economy to slow down. We expected that to create some uncertainty -- additional uncertainty that would affect this discretionary renovation activity. As we all know, some of the economic activity has actually been revised upward. And we've not seen the slowdown in that discretionary work as we were expecting. And remember, it was a slightly modest, so it wasn't a significant downturn, but just some softening there. We did not see that. But I'll say, Brian, most encouragingly in the quarter was on the volume side was the contribution from our initiatives and our growth initiatives. Given a little flatter plane here, we can really start to see the impact of our growth initiatives above and beyond what is still relatively flattish to softer market conditions. So really pleased by that. And sitting here today, where we are into the fourth quarter, we continue to not see a softening in that discretionary renovation activity pipeline. And so we're basically calling the rest of the year as we've been experiencing all year and this kind of more stabilized flattish market conditions and then executing very well there to expand margins, grow our earnings and our top line double digits.

Good to hear. And then second question, I guess, on the Mineral Fiber margins, stronger this quarter, even with the discrete expenses, even excluding discrete expenses. Can you just help unpack that number a little bit more here? I think you provided some drivers. But maybe just putting it really in the context around this level of margin you have with this level of volume and kind of just how it compares historically because it's -- I believe it's a good number on a lower volume base. So just any more context around how you guys are thinking about that?

Yes. That's again, another good question. Let me take that, and Chris, I'll let you add some color to this. But I mean, really, when you look at -- in spite of some of those unusual and atypical expenses that Chris talked about, we delivered a 44% EBITDA margin in the Mineral Fiber segment. That's really strong. And so when you think about for the rest of the year, we're going to finish at 43%, as I was saying in my prepared remarks. And that's back to the highest watermark that we experienced before the pandemic in 2019. So we're really encouraged by the way the business underlying is performing. And the building blocks of that, again, is really making sure we're getting good price realization to more than offset inflation in the marketplace, which we're continuing to do very well. selling a richer mix into the marketplace, which we're doing very well, slightly offset a little bit as we talked about earlier on the retail channel. And then productivity, continuing to drive meaningful productivity in our plants to help us offset inflationary costs. So that's what leads to really good margin performance in the business, and we expect that to continue. And Chris, I'll let you add any additional color there.

Yes, absolutely. You hit on all the key building blocks. The only additional item to mention there in terms of Mineral Fiber EBITDA margins is the contribution from WAVE equity earnings expected to grow about 6% this year. So again, with that contribution, really pleased with the overall EBITDA margin for the Mineral Fiber segment.

Your next question comes from the line of Garik Shmois with Loop Capital.

This is Zack Pacheco on for Garik. Maybe just one more on the Mineral Fiber margin over 43%, that pre-pandemic level. Do you guys kind of see a natural cap getting over that through maybe just the industry dynamics or your level of investment? Or how do you kind of view taking that next step above that pre-pandemic level?

Yes, it's a common question we get. And honestly, we just keep pointing back to the building blocks, what the drivers of margin. And really -- and that's a good measure of the efficiency in how we run the business, right, in terms of making sure we're pricing and getting enough price to cover inflationary dynamics and driving productivity in the plants, innovating to make sure that we're bringing higher-margin products, higher AUV and value products to the marketplace. Those same building blocks we were just talking about, I think as long as those are present and we continue to invest behind those, which we're committed to do, we continue to look for greater efficiency and greater margins from here.

Understood. And then just quickly an update on the Geometrik acquisition from earlier in the quarter and kind of just the M&A environment in general as you guys see it.

You bet. Yes, the Geometrik is a great add for our business, our Architectural Specialty business and in particular, for the Wood platform, which is one of the fastest-growing platforms in the Architectural Specialty business. It's an exciting on-trend look and feel that architects and owners are looking for. And this really adds two real dimensions of competitive advantage. Number one, the extension of the product portfolio to include a greater number of species, really on-trend type species in our wood portfolio. And it gives us a geographic advantage also by being out West. So it's a really great add to the portfolio. And we like these kinds of acquisitions that bring competitive advantage, additional capabilities for us to bring into the architects' offices with the rest of our portfolio. So it's a good example. It's on the smaller side, but we're open for business in terms of our acquisitions. We have a dedicated team that's getting up every day and it's working our pipeline. And we believe there's more of these bolt-on type acquisitions out there for our Architectural Specialty business. So more to come on that front as well.

Your next question comes from the line of John Lovallo with UBS.

I guess the first question is just on the Mineral Fiber volumes up slightly in the quarter. How do you think the performance there compared to the underlying market?

Yes, it's really hard to put a very precise number on that. But when the markets are flat, they're anywhere from plus or minus 1, maybe 0.5 point either way. So -- but what we do know is that the growth initiatives and the volume contribution from our growth initiatives really was a nice contributor to the overall upside that you saw that we experienced in the quarter. Markets are still relatively soft. So these flattish conditions can actually be reflective of these -- of the market activity at a lower level that we've been experiencing all year. So I think that's the best way I can describe it, John, in terms of how the overall market is performing.

Okay. Got it. And then sticking on Mineral Fiber, it looks like sales to the distribution channel were actually very strong, up 9% year-over-year. What drove this kind of relative strength compared to the other channels?

Yes. I'd say, John, just to continue to point to our strong commercial execution, really, again, coupled with the initiatives that Vic mentioned, we continue to be pleased with the level of performance there in the quarter and are excited about just the way that we've executed in that particular part of the market.

Your next question comes from the line of Philip Ng with Jefferies.

A question for Chris. Can you give us an update how you're thinking about inflation broadly for the full year, some of the major inputs and whatnot and the pace in the back half? And then in terms of productivity, you sounded pretty upbeat about what's still in front of you. Should we expect a pretty consistent steady dose of productivity that you still have available for 2026 to kind of tap into?

Sure. Yes. Thanks for the question, Phil. Yes, I'll take the second part of that first. In terms of productivity, yes, pleased with our level of productivity in our plants, certainly year-to-date in the quarter and what we're expecting for the full year. And going back to our comments around the value creation drivers and the building blocks of the business, I feel very confident about our ability to continue to get those productivity gains on a go-forward basis. From an inflation perspective, just a reminder in terms of call it, the categories of inflation. In Mineral Fiber, about 35% of our inflation of COGS is raw materials and then energy is about 10% freight is about 10%. So from a total input cost perspective for the full year, we're outlooking low single-digit inflation with freight about flat compared to prior year, raws in that low single-digit inflation range and then energy in that low double-digit inflation range. So hopefully, that gives you a little bit more color around the bits and pieces of how we're thinking about inflation on a percentage basis versus prior year for '25.

And Chris, any big nuances in front half versus back half in terms of some of those inflation components, if it's moderating or it's been pretty steady all year?

Yes, I'd say slightly moderating a bit in the back half but not significantly.

Okay. That's helpful. And then Vic, AS has been a home run for you guys, really strong growth, strong organic growth. And I think you pointed out in your prepared remarks, orders and backlogs are still growing at double-digit clip. And I think you mentioned if you could grow at double-digit clip, I mean, 20% EBITDA margin is a good way to think about the business in the medium, longer term. So my question really comes down to, obviously, you have some really tough comps in the first half of '25. What's a good way to think about organic growth in that business when we look out to 2026? Is it double digits the right way to think about? Or that's the number that includes M&A? I just want to be mindful of the tougher comps next year.

Yes. On the organic side, we've been running in the high single digits this year. And we'll stop short to forecast what that looks like for next year. But again, with the double-digit growth in our order intake, a lot of that's organic. So I would expect the growth for next year organically to continue to be at a really good clip. What exactly that is relative to this year yet, I think we still have to do our work and our modeling on that to accurately answer that. But I still expect good solid organic growth in that business in addition to the inorganic bolt-on acquisitions that we expect to continue.

Phil, if I could come back. Yes, my comment on the moderating versus back half was really around what we expected back in July. So if I were to take a look at the fourth quarter relative to our actual run rate for the first 9 months of the first 3 quarters, a little bit of an uptick in energy and a little bit of an uptick in raws, but it's really not that big. But relative to July, a moderating expectation versus where we were last quarter for the full year.

Your final question comes from the line of Stephen Kim with Evercore ISI.

This is Aatish on for Steve. Just one quick one for me. You touched on it a little bit in the prepared remarks, but could you talk a little bit more about the digital initiatives and kind of how you've seen that -- the impact of that grow over time and evolve over time, maybe some lessons learned?

Yes. The ones that I called out in our -- my prepared remarks around Project Works, let me just start there for a second because I think this is an automated software platform that takes the intelligence of a long time of designing ceilings and automates those design rules and a platform that can help architects really expedite the iterations on different types of designs or iterations of designs. And that's a huge productivity tool that the architects are learning about as we get more and more products onto the platform to meet their needs. In addition to that, because of this automated platform is based on historical data, we can pump out very accurate bill of materials that allows them to really predict the project costing and also the ordering for the contractor. If you think about these really complex projects, there's a lot of parts and pieces that go into the installation of these on the job site, and we can get really precise with exactly the number of pieces and components that have to go. And that's really attractive for the contractor community to not have to guess about how much they need of something. So for both of those customer bases, this Project Works platform continues to grow every quarter, more and more users and more and more activity. And we're really pleased with -- we think when we look at the data, the win rate of projects that go through Project Works is higher than when they don't because of the value that we're creating with architects and the contractors. So we continue to be very encouraged by the traction it's getting in the communities that we're operating in. Canopy was the other one that continues to adjust itself and serve the smaller customer that we feel like kind of falls through the cracks that doesn't really know where to go or how to get their ceiling repaired or replaced. And it leads them through an educational process that gets them to placing an order. It's turning out to be a very effective platform, and we continue to improve it every quarter on making it even better and better of a customer experience. And so I was really pleased with the traction that it's getting, not only at the top line, setting a record top line, but really the profitability of that platform, delivering a record EBITDA level of performance and contributing now to the overall business. So those two digital initiatives I was talking about, I think that's a little bit more color behind them, but we continue to get really good operating leverage on both of those investments.

With no further questions in the queue, I will turn the call back over to Vic Grizzle for closing remarks.

Great. Thank you, and thank you all for joining our call today. Again, we're on track to have another record year in 2025. Really pleased with both double-digit top and double-digit bottom and maybe mostly the traction that we're getting with our investments and the way that we're expanding margins in the business. So we're excited for finishing the year strong and setting up what is going to be another exciting year in '26. Thank you again for joining our call.

Thank you again for joining us today. This concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect.