Greetings, and welcome to the AxoGen, Inc. 2024 First Quarter Financial Results Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded. It's now my pleasure to introduce your host, Harold Tamayo, Vice President of Finance and Investor Relations. Thank you, Harold. You may begin.

Thank you, Keith. Good morning, everyone. Joining me on today's call is Karen Zaderej, AxoGen's Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President; and Nir Naor, Chief Financial Officer. Karen will discuss the first quarter of 2024 financial results, and Nir will provide an analysis of our financial performance and guidance and discuss our outlook for the year, followed by a question-and-answer session. Today's call is being broadcast live via webcast, which is available on the Investors section of the AxoGen website. Following the end of the live call, a replay will be available in the Investors section of the company's website at www.axogeninc.com. Before we get started, I'd like to remind you that during this conference call, the company will make projections and forward-looking statements, including our financial guidance, our expectations regarding our ability to expand our footprint and expand revenue from core accounts, anticipated growth for revenue categories, marketing opportunities with nerve applications associated with breast, OMF protection and surgical treatment of pain and new products; our expectations regarding the timing of the launch of Avive+; our statement regarding the timing of the complete biologics license application submission for advanced nerve graft as well as a statement regarding the timing for approval of the BLA. Our expectation is that assuming approval of the BLA, Advance Nerve Graft will be designated as a reference product and the expected market exclusivity of such designation and our expectations around cash flow, including that we will continue trending towards cash flow breakeven and profitability. Forward-looking statements are based on current beliefs and assumptions and are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks and uncertainties, including, not without limitation, the risks and uncertainties reflected in the company's annual and periodic reports such as hospital staffing issues, regulatory processes and approvals, surgeon and product adoption and market awareness of our products. The forward-looking statements are representative only as of the date they are made and except as required by applicable law. We assume no responsibility to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements. In addition for a reconciliation of non-GAAP measures, please reference today's press release in our corporate presentation on the Investors section of the company's website. Now I would like to turn the call over to Karen. Karen?

Thank you, Harold, and thank you all for joining us today as we discuss our 2024 first quarter financial results. We had a solid first quarter, and we're pleased with both the positive trends in revenue and bottom line. Our performance underscores the progress we continue to make towards profitability and generating positive cash flow. During today's call, I'm going to highlight the progress we've made across our business as well as some changes we've made on the disclosure and reporting side, which both Nir and I will discuss later on in the call. Revenue for the quarter increased by 12.9% to $41.4 million compared to last year. We're pleased with this quarter's top line performance, which was at a run rate above the midpoint of our annual guidance. Looking closely at the quarter, growth was broad-based across our products and applications. We saw a strong January and February, and our typical step-up in volume occurred in April rather than March this year. We remain confident that we will achieve our 2024 top line guidance. As part of the disclosure and reporting changes I alluded to in my opening comments, we've made the strategic decision to remove our revenue breakdown between scheduled and emergent trauma applications. Our growth strategy continues to be focused on going deeper and high potential accounts and to build the nerve repair business in these accounts across all of our targeted nerve repair applications. We believe the performance and key metrics pertaining to sales productivity and our progress in our core accounts provide the most clarity on the business model versus estimates of revenue by application. We will continue to talk qualitatively about the applications for nerve repair and our growth to give you color on both the opportunities in front of us and the progress…

Thank you, Karen. It's been very exciting 5 months since I joined the AxoGen team. I've been listening carefully to the various teams and quickly learning the vast details behind this robust and innovative business. As part of my diligence, I have seen several different opportunities and changes to enhance our reporting. All of these changes were strictly voluntary. And although our previous practices are acceptable alternatives, I believe that the new practices are more widely used in the industry and provide investors improved comparability of the company's financial statements to peers. In addition, these changes will provide better transparency and facilitate better resource allocation as we continue our journey to profitability. Our auditors have reviewed these changes and agree that they are acceptable. One of these changes involve our accounting policy for shipping and handling costs. As of the first quarter of 2024, our shipping and handling costs directly related to bringing our products to their final destination, including facility and warehousing overhead, are now included in cost of goods sold, whereas previously, they were included in sales and marketing expenses. Additionally, as of the first quarter of 2024, we ceased allocating certain costs to and from certain departments. Previously, such costs had been allocated based on the company's estimate of the proportionate share of total expense to each line item. It is important to recognize that all of these changes, which were completely voluntary, had no impact on net revenue, loss from operations, net loss per common share or cash flows. We have made available our 2023 reclassified condensed consolidated statements of operations by quarter in our earnings release this morning to provide full transparency of these changes. Correspondingly, all the 2023 financial results that we refer to include all of these changes. In addition, we will no…

[Operator Instructions] And the first question comes from Michael Sarcone with Jefferies.

Karen, just the first one. Your comments on performance through the quarter, you talked about a strong January and February and then a volume uptick in April. Can you maybe give us a little bit of color on what happened in March and how that compares to what you've seen historically?

Yes. As you know, we historically have seen as the summer months start a sort of step up in the second quarter, and that usually leads in, in March. And this year, we did not see the lead in, in March. We saw it actually, as I said in my notes, get pushed into April is where we saw the step-up. I'm going to hypothesize here that it had to do with the timing of the Easter holidays, but that's just a hypothesis on my part. We have talked to a number of hospital systems that have also said they saw a shift in the March time frame on their elective outpatient procedures that might support that. But what we just saw was a little difference in timing of when we saw that step up occur. Having said that, we're really pleased to see that we saw growth again across products, across applications, continuing to build this business with a real focus in building out those core accounts and driving penetration in core account.

Got it. That's helpful. And just given that you saw the step-up in April rather than March, does that have any implications for quarterly sales cadence through the balance of the year, particularly if it differs from prior years?

I think in the end, we're still going to see the cadence that you see a second quarter step-up and a third quarter step-up that we've seen in the past. So I think we're not seeing a difference there. It's just a slight difference in timing of the week that it occurred in.

Got it. And just one last one for me. Can you give us any updates on the CEO search?

CEO search is in process. There's a group of independent directors who are leading the search. They've hired an outside search firm who is sourcing candidates, and they're going through the interview process. So still work in process that ultimately we'll get an announcement as we finalize that. They want to be thoughtful in that selection. And then of course, if you remember, I'll still be available from a consulting standpoint for a period of time to support that transition.

And the next question comes from Mike Kratky with SMB Securities.

Can you just give a little bit more color on the decision to remove the schedule versus the emerging breakdown? I mean, was there anything you saw this quarter that was kind of at odds with what you expected? Or any changes to how we should be thinking about the split between those 2 moving forward?

Yes. Thank you for the question. So as we mentioned, this breakout is based on estimates and provide this qualitative breakout between those 2 procedures. And after looking into that, especially with this emphasis on resource allocations that I promoted and talking to several analysts and investors, I got the conclusion that it doesn't provide the best insights and the best way to look at our business and our commercial strategy. Our commercial strategy has been to increase our penetration into high potential accounts, which each spend several procedures and applications and surgeon specialties. So that is basically the rationale.

And then in your question, again, from a color commentary standpoint. We continue to see growth across multiple applications and products were not isolated into one area or one product, frankly. We're excited to continue to see the growth that we see in the protection area. If you remember, protection is both part of trauma and part of our scheduled cases. And so we are pleased to see that we're seeing all of these areas continue to grow. And that's one of the shifts again is to say that growth is predominantly happening in these core accounts. That's where our focus is. So I'm just thinking that the core account metrics are going to be more indicative of how we're growing our business.

Got it. And then maybe just a quick follow-up. But from a product mix standpoint, I know you're not going to give details on kind of the specifics. But how should we think about the contribution from some of the newer product launches in terms of 2024 and the second half of this year?

I'm sorry. So could you state the question again?

Yes, just in terms of how we should think about the contribution from some of the newer product launches that you've had for the second half of this year and 2024 in general.

Okay. Well, first, we consider them in our guidance, so they were included in the guidance that aren't part of a change in guidance with the launch of the 2 protection products. Avive+ will launch here in June, so it will be ramping up. So like all new products, I think the back half of the year, while surgeons are going to be excited to try it, the revenue impact is still going to be modest because you've got to go through value analysis committees to get it into the accounts. So there's work that has to happen before it can really start to impact revenue. HA+, on the other hand, we've gone through a lot of that value analysis submissions, getting it allowed to be bought -- either brought into or stocked in hospitals and we're starting to see good, steady use of the product and reuse of the product. I can't give you an exact contribution, but we are really pleased to see that it is taking its rightful place in some of the surgeons' treatment algorithms and is becoming a product that they regularly use in certain use applications.

And the next question comes from Catlin Cronin with Canaccord Genuity.

This is [ George ] on for Catlin. I just have a couple of questions on our end. Just first, what was procedure growth like in the quarter on a percentage basis year-over-year? And then maybe talk a little bit about just the general health of the overall market you're seeing in '24.

I'm sorry, again. It was hard to hear the question. If you could repeat the question?

Yes. So our first question was just understanding how procedure growth was like in the quarter on a year-over-year basis. And then just more generally, on the health of the overall market that you're seeing in '24.

Yes. We've seen good procedure growth in -- so let me break each of the segments. So trauma has seasonality to it. So we saw the seasonality that we would expect in a Q1 with the noted exception of the timing of the step-up. As people start to get more active, we saw that pushed into April instead of the trail part of March. In terms of some of our scheduled areas, breast neurotization, we continue to see increasing demand by patients with strong interest in getting the Resensation technique as a part of their reconstruction, whether they have either an implant-based or deep -- a flat-based reconstruction. So we continue to see interest and as we train surgeons and surgical teams, expansion in breast neurotization and growth in that area. In Oral Maxillofacial, we continue to see -- in Oral Maxillofacial and pain are 2 smaller areas. We continue to see surgeon interest and are seeing procedural growth continuing, where they're doing neurotization in those procedures or managing the pain with the surgical treatment of the nerves. So we saw a good cadence through the quarter in all of those areas and think that, again, we're on a trajectory of continuing to see growth, in particular, in breast as we train more surgeons and get more surgeon teams engaged.

Yes. Great. That's very helpful. And then just one last one from us. Do you have any further clarity on the gross margin cadence in '24 as you kind of sell through your old inventory from your previous facility?

Yes. So it's -- as we mentioned in the last earnings call, the gross margin in the first half of the year is going to be higher than that in the second half of the year, where the main reason is that the inventory sold in the first half of the year comes from the one produced last year in the previous facility at a bit of a lower cost. Whereas the ones sold in the second half of the year is for, once produced, will be produced at our current facility at a bit of a higher cost. And that said, again, the guidance we reiterated for the entire year of 76% to 79%.

And the next question comes from Ross Osborn with Cantor Fitzgerald.

So starting off and given a focus on core accounts, would you discuss what the site of service mix looks like for core accounts and your penetration level in hospital outpatient?

Again, it must be our speaker, but we're -- if you could repeat the question. It was hard to hear.

Sure. I was just asking what the site of service mix looks like for your core accounts and then the penetration level and hospital outpatient.

Yes. No, thank you. So our site of care, we -- in our core accounts, we tend to be Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 trauma centers as the majority, and then some specialty hospitals where you may see it may be driven in that case by a breast center or it might be a military center that does nerve repair. So those are typically the best targets for us as well as, obviously, academic teaching hospitals. There are, however, in our core accounts, some freestanding ambulatory surgery centers. And that really is an artifact of the fact that the threshold is $100,000. That could be one active surgeon who's doing nerve repair. Obviously, if it is a freestanding ambulatory surgery center, it doesn't have the same potential as a large academic center. So when I say our biggest centers are over $1 million today, that's not going to be the ambulatory surgery center. That's going to be a Level 1, Level 2, Level 3, trauma center, hospital or academic center. So our focus, again, is continuing to build those high potential accounts, building out the core accounts and continue to drive that business. Now when I talk about a Level 1 trauma center, that's going to be a mix of inpatient and outpatient procedures. So we do see actually a fair amount of the surgery that's done in trauma is an outpatient procedure. Where that's possible, they're going to try and move that patient through the hospital in under 24 hours and technically be classified as an outpatient procedure. The ambulatory surgery centers are the ones that we have not typically been as focused on. And as I said, we have some, but we've not typically been as focused on that. Having said that, we have done quite a bit of reimbursement work. It's been an economic challenge for ambulatory surgery centers predominantly. We've done a lot of reimbursement work to make sure that there is a new structure where they can economically have it make sense for them to do nerve repair in these freestanding centers. And so under the new coding and payment structure that CMS has set up, it is now economically viable and certainly an attractive overall health care alternative to move these procedures into these ambulatory surgery centers. And we are starting to see some of that migration happen. It has been a migration, not a revolution. But we see -- quarter-over-quarter, we continue to see growth of the procedures that are done in these ambulatory surgery centers, and we do expect for the future that, that will continue.

Great. That's very helpful. And then lastly for us. Would you just walk through how your conversations have gone with accounts, sort of Avive Soft Tissue, maybe relative to the year?

Sure. Well, we've done a limited market release. So it's not broadly available. But with some leading surgeons who are very anxious to get this product back into their treatment algorithm, we've provided it upfront. Feedback that we've gotten to date has been extremely positive. Surgeons are very happy to have this alternative for nerve protection. Again, meeting the need where there's a short-term resorbable protection need predominantly in acute trauma, although also sometimes in pain, surgical treatment of pain. And so we are excited to have this as an opportunity to provide them this added solution in their nerve treatment. Surgeon feedback has been very favorable, in fact, more positive. If you remember, we had a product called the Avive that we voluntarily withdrew from the market a number of years ago because of changes the FDA did in regulatory classifications of birth tissue products and ultimately decided that we would withdraw that product. Surgeons liked that product. They like this product better in terms of the handling and the characteristics of the product that they're using intraoperatively. And so we're really pleased to get it out there and excited to get in the hands of all of our sales reps and our customers to be able to use on these patients.

And there are no further questions at this time, so I would like to turn the floor back over to Karen Zaderej for any closing comments.

Well, thank you, Keith. Well, as we wrap up today's earnings call, I want to extend a thank you to our team here at AxoGen for their outstanding work and to everyone who participated on this call for their engagement and input. The commitment of our employees has been crucial in reaching the achievement we've talked about today as we continue to change the lives of patients with peripheral nerve injuries. Thank you.

Thank you. This concludes today's teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.