Good morning, everyone, and welcome to the Axis Capital Q3 2012 earnings conference call. [Operator Instructions] Please note that today's event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference call over to Ms. Linda Ventresca, Investor Relations. Ma'am, you may begin.

Thank you, Jamie, and good morning ladies and gentlemen. I am happy to welcome you to our conference call to discuss the financial results for Axis Capital for the third quarter ended September 30, 2012. Our earnings press release and financial supplement were issued yesterday evening after the market closed. If you would like copies, please visit the investor information section of our website www.axiscapital.com. We set aside one hour for today's call, which is also available as an audio webcast through the investor information section of our website. A replay of the teleconference will be available by dialing 877-344-7529 in the United States. The international number is 412-317-0088. The conference code for both replay dial-in numbers is 10018984. With me on today's call are Albert Benchimol, our President and CEO; and Joseph Henry, our CFO. Before I turn the call over to Albert, I will remind everyone that statements made during this call, including the question-and-answer session, which are not historical facts, may be forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements contained in this presentation include, but are not necessarily limited to information regarding our estimate of losses related to catastrophes, policies, and other loss events, general economic, capital and credit market conditions, future growth prospects, financial results, and capital management initiatives, evaluation of losses and loss reserves, investment strategies, investment portfolio and market performance, impact to the marketplace with respect to changes in pricing models and our expectations regarding pricing and other market conditions. These statements involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions which could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations. For a discussion of these matters, please refer to the risk factors section in our most recent Form 10-K on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. In addition, this presentation contains information regarding operating income and our consolidated underwriting income, which are non-GAAP financial measures within the meaning of the U.S. federal securities laws. For a reconciliation of these items to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures, please refer to our press release, which can be found on our website. With that I would like to turn the call over to Albert.

Thank you, Linda, and a good morning to everyone. We are pleased with our results for the third quarter. Our quarterly operating income of $201 million or $1.53 per share represents an annualized operating ROE of 15.2%. Our diluted book value reached an new all-time high of $43.57 per share, an increase of 7.4% in the quarter and 17.6% over the last 12 months. We benefited from the low-level of catastrophe activity and the favorable impact of strong equity markets on our overall investment returns but these aside, our businesses are operating at a high level. Underwriting results across substantially all units showed good fundamentals. Where we affected changes in business mix, it was generally to favor lines and markets showing continued improvements. We also sustained progress in a number of initiatives we have been cultivating for some time. I will now turn the call over to Joe to review the financials. I will comment further on market environments, business activities later. Joe?

Thank you, Albert and good morning, everyone. This quarter, we generated an annualized 16.9% return on average common equity and operating ROE of 15.2%. In addition, quarterly diluted book value per common share increased by more than $3 per share in the quarter. Our results benefited from a quiet catastrophe environment and a low-level of large losses as well as continued favorable prior year developments. Valuation improvements on our available for sale investment portfolio and share repurchases executed at a discounted book value also contributed to these excellent actual results. Our strong underwriting results absorbed the impact of U.S. crop losses and hurricane Isaac during the quarter, a testament, in our opinion, to the value of diversification by geography and product in our underwriting portfolio. We view this, coupled with the superior risk selection capabilities of our underwriters as critical to driving superior returns for our shareholders. This is especially the case, given the persistency of the low interest rate environment and the lack of sufficient compensation for taking additional risk in the investment portfolio. Moving into the details on the income statement. Our third quarter gross premiums written were up 2.2% to $848 million. Growth emanated from our insurance segment where premiums were up $36 million attributable to a number of lines. The real growth story in the insurance segment is impacted by targeted reductions in MGA produced, cat-exposed business as we have made a tactical decisions to supply the market with cat-capacity on a more fungible basis. The reallocation of this capacity unfortunately does not occur perfectly in tandem. Partially offsetting growth in insurance was $24 million decline in reinsurance segment premiums. Group net premiums written were down 3% in the quarter. Changes in our reinsurance purchasing effective last quarter, as well as the business mix changes contributed…

Thank you, Joe. Let's begin with a commentary on the rate environment. Overall, we are encouraged by the continued pricing environment in the primary insurance market where we are seeing the most promising increases particularly in the U.S. The improvements now extend across most classes and geographies in our insurance portfolio with a number of lines now seeing great improvement compounding upon prior year increases. The rate change across Axis Insurance for the third quarter was 5% with equally encouraging trends in retention ratios. This continued the progress we have seen all year with an average increase of 3% in the first quarter and 4% in the second. Of course, there remains a wide variation across different lines and markets. In our U.S. division, the overall rate change for the third quarter is 11%, in line with the second quarter. Property classes which dominated the division are experiencing their sixth quarter of rate improvement and our casualty lines are now matching or in some cases even exceeding increases achieved on property lines. The strongest improvement is coming from E&S umbrella and excess casualty. The standard market companies that allowed surplus lines risk in to their portfolios are now re-underwriting that business and generally backing away from accounts they sought to write in softer market conditions. This is all occurring as an increasing number of wholesale carriers are cleansing their own portfolio. These factors are all supporting substantial premium and rate increases for larger, tougher risks moving back into the E&S market. In our international division, which includes a number of different specialty lines, the overall rate improvement for the third quarter is 4% but there are wide variations in this highly diversified portfolio. Most property lines are showing high-single digits to low-double-digit rate increases. Excess casualty lines are showing mid-single…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Matthew Heimermann from JPMorgan.

I guess it's an indirect Sandy question but with some of the changes you made to, on the reinsurance portfolio and obviously there has been reallocation of capacity broadly, how should we think about your northeast mid-Atlantic exposure today? I guess, specifically, how should we think about where those exposures are, both in aggregate and then also, where those exposures are generated? Regional cat, clients, large national cat clients, per risk, facultative, the direct side of things and just how things play out where you think most likely, from those buckets you will see losses emerge?

Right. I think when you look at the cat exposures generally for Sandy -- and I think it is probably worthwhile talking about the fact that Sandy is a unique and unusual storm. So making any early predictions with regard to Sandy is probably fraught with risk but with regard to where our exposures are, in more cat exposed, if you would, segments of the loss curves, I would say that a majority would be on the reinsurance side versus the insurance side. And that’s because of course there is more balance in the insurance book, there is individual per risk coverage that will apply in the insurance book. We also have, as you know, reinsurance protection in our insurance books. So on the low end of losses, it is balanced. As soon as you get to more of a cat exposed event, the potential losses start to shift more towards the reinsurance area. With regards to our reinsurance book, our book is more toward the national accounts, more towards the commercially oriented national accounts. It doesn’t mean that we do not have regional account. But we tend to have generally national accounts and commercial bent towards our reinsurance book.

Then is there much facultative or per risk we should worry about outside of or when you said national accounts with commercial bent, was that kind of catch all for all forms?

I would say, that’s right. Obviously there is some per risk on the facultative side. We don’t do a lot of facultative. What little we do on the global wholesale markets out of London, tends to be actually more within our specialties that we write out of London. Our reinsurance operation doesn't have a large facultative presence, but it does have per risk covers. So you may have some exposure coming out of individual per risk covers.

Okay, that’s helpful. Then just when we think about where the exposures have come in the mid-Atlantic Northeast, is that across the board or are there some more targeted exposures that you have actually pulled in that potentially, whether or not they help in aggregate, I am sure the reduction helps in this type of scenario but just curious where those declines occurred?

Matt, I presume you are asking about the fact that over the last 18 months or so, we have made some repositioning of our cat book. Is that what you are referring to?

Yes, and I am specifically looking at mid-Atlantic, Northeast, for that’s one of the big impacts, less so with the other regions, more so just staying at the top.

Well, just again, on a background basis, as you know and we have indicated this to you now for a number of quarters, we felt that having reviewed our cat portfolio, given the events of 2010, 2011 we took a fresh look. And in some cases we found that our cat book didn’t have the kind of balance that we wanted it to have. As you pointed out, we felt that our exposure in the mid-Atlantic and Northeast was higher than we wanted it to be. And as you have pointed out, we have made some meaningful reductions to our exposures, which have translated into some downward shifts in our PML curves in the mid-Atlantic and the Northeast. So obviously that speaks to the fact that there is less exposure today in that book than there would have been 18 months ago. It doesn’t mean there is business no exposure but there is less exposure.

Okay, and then, just on the loss ratio excluding development and disclosed catastrophes. At the beginning of the year, you talked about when there was perceived margin, adverse margin variance, that there was some change to the reserve process for how you were going to establish IB&R. I think especially around property side of the business, both insurance and reinsurance. Are we starting to see the benefit of that now in 3Q in the sense that was with low attritional losses and that you are actually, in some of that IB&R, you might have held in prior quarters is not necessarily being held to the same extent now? And I was just curious because obviously there is some mix going on too. So I am just trying to discern what's what.

Thank you for raising the question because I wasn’t sure what you meant when your report this morning. A standard line here, we have not changed our approach to reserving. I think it is an important statement. What happened in the first quarter was really a judgment call in the first quarter, and a judgment call we made in the first quarter was that although we saw light experience, we were not yet prepared to change our, what I would call attritional loss ratios. That’s really the only issue, and so obviously, we have seen a partial release of that, if you would, over the last 2 quarters. But that is not a major contributor to the overall improvement in the loss ratios that we put up in the third quarter.

Our next question comes from Greg Locraft from Morgan Stanley.

Initially, I will just apologize, because I am going to be in the go-forward outlook part of questioning. How do you think about share buybacks, capital deployment, et cetera in light of the uncertainty surrounding Sandy? Eqecat looks to have just doubled their estimated loss, by the way, for the event, in terms of their range. So how do you think about that as for sort of getting arms around this loss?

I guess the short answer is, the uncertainty regarding Sandy's is going to be resolved in the next few weeks. I don’t think that we need to make more of that than it needs to be. Our attitude towards, share repurchases is the same, which is we will take a look at our capital position. And again, although we are not prepared to discuss what kind of loss Sandy will be, we remain confident that it will not prevent us from having a strong capital position and participating in the markets going forward. I think the real issue for us is comparing the opportunities going forward to the extent that if we see strong opportunities, my preference is to use that capital to write new business to the extent that we have less of an opportunity to write it to use our capital to write good business. Again, as long as you guys want to sell to us for less than book value, we are a happy buyer. So I think what I would suggest is, let's take a look at what the fourth quarter looks like, let's take a look at what the renewals look like and I will give you more clear guidance as we get into the first quarter. But what I told you generally at the beginning of this year was that we felt that we would give back to our shareholders somewhere between 50% and 100% of our earnings this year between repurchases and dividend. Certainly we are on line to do that to be closer to the hundred. I think at this point in time, because we are expecting an improved market, I would like to believe that opportunities will be such that it will be a smaller range of share repurchases but we are leaning towards continued share repurchases, but exact amount will be dependent both our capital and our opportunities.

Okay, great. Then secondly, how does the Sandy just in the trenches, how does that impact the January 1 renewal discussions. There was sort of a glide path that we picked up at Monte Carlo and Baden-Baden and then you dropped this in the system. At what point does it trigger a different type of discussion as we get towards the January 1 renewal date? Obviously that’s a reinsurance question.

Right, and obviously this is moving target but what I say is this. The feeling that we had in Monte Carlo and Baden-Baden was, excuse the term, mushy. There wasn’t really a lot of momentum one way or the other and generally when you have that kind of environment, it's very likely that the buyers and the brokers would try and push for some further reduction. I think if anything Sandy, reminds people that there is valuable protection to be purchased and if nothing else, it will reinforce stability, potentially clearly in the Northeast and some loss affected account, some pricing increases. But at the very least, I would hope, that it would the end any talk of any erosion in excess of loss pricing.

Our next question comes from the Vinay Misquith from Evercore Partners.

The first question is on the PMLs. The 150 PML for Northeast storm is about $55 million. Just curious whether that includes primary insurance as well as reinsurance?

All of our PMLs are group PMLs. So they include all of our exposures whether they come from the primary or the reinsurance side.

Okay, that’s helpful and just looking at the Hurricane Sandy, would you think it's close to 150 a storm, 120 a storm. How would you look at that?

I have no idea. Again, I think it's dangerous to try and make guesses right now as to the full extent. Look, the one thing that I think needs to be made very clear is that this is an incredibly unique and unprecedented event. I think that it's dangerous to take a look at Irene or any prior events and try to multiply the loss from Irene and so it equates to whatever you believe is Sandy. There is a lot of factors here that probably we should point out. Amongst the unusual features, as we had record storm surge in a highly concentrated high-value region. This storm was unusual, both in its spread and its slow speed which increases the area and the intensity of damage. Obviously from everything that you have seen, most of the damage has come from storm surge. Not that much wind, obviously we have seen some wind but not as much as you would in a typical coastal event. If that’s the case, I think the distribution of losses are going to be different. It is very likely that for a number of personal lines, most of that storm surge damage is going to be covered by the national flood insurance protection. Therefore we will likely see a smaller percentage of personal lines contributing to this loss than commercial lines. We did some work here on our own and we looked at all the major losses going back 11 years or so and the spread of loss between commercial and personal and auto. On average, personal lines are about 60% of the reported insurance cat loss. Commercial is about 40%. However where you have losses that tend to be predominantly storm surge, whether it’s a significant component of federal program protection and just to give you an example, Floyd and Allison, back in '99 and 2001. In those situations commercial losses were 70% of the overall cat loss. So you are now moving away from what is usually more predictable personal lines to the commercial area. The commercial area, because it tends to be very lumpy, there are some very large treaties or risks covered. There is no standardization. You have got manuscript coverages. You have got different definitions. It is almost impossible to reach a pre-event or 25,000 foot view of what commercial losses will be. I believe that the variability around estimates here is going to be high. So as I said, in my response to Greg, I think we will have that uncertainty resolved over the next few weeks and we will deal with that. But at this point in time, I think it is dangerous at best to try and guess where to pin down where the storm will be.

Sure thing. I just want to follow-up on that. Given your PMLs for the one in 50, one in 100 year event for the Northeast, how large of an industry event were you focusing for the 50 and the 100 year event?

Again, I am not even sure that, that matters because when you look at the way the PML curves are drawn, you are dealing with hundreds of thousands of individual scenarios. Again I am not even sure that any of those 100,000 scenarios perfectly matched with what Sandy is. I will say one thing. The way we visit this area, we think of this as a mid-Atlantic storm. New York is part of the mid-Atlantic region. Last summer when we discussed with you our various approach to PML modeling, we were clear in providing and in fact, it's on our website. Our definition of U.S. wind zones and the mid-Atlantic, for us, covers Delaware, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia, D.C., West Virginia. So it is somewhere in my mind along our mid-Atlantic curve, but I would not presume to guess where on that curve it would be.

And our next question comes from Ryan Byrnes from Langen McAlenney.

Just to mix it up a little bit, obviously you guys have decided to cut property risk over the past couple of quarters. I just wanted to see how far along the reentry process you guys are for the property and cat books. I guess how much longer should we potentially looking at to decreases in these books?

I think there is two ways to look at this. When you are talking about property you are very likely speaking about the insurance book. I would go back to Joe's prepared remarks. The issue here is not moving away from property, it's repositioning the way we access the property risk. Let me take this back a little bit. Historically when we did not have the footprint that we have today, we used the MGA relationships to access all kinds of risks including significant amount of cat-exposed property risk. Today when we look at our strategy, our position, we clearly have a much better footprint, significantly better distribution and access to risk. And MGAs continue to be a very important part of our strategy because they can help us access risk that we do not easily access on our own, either because of the very special nature of the relationships that the MGA has or in some cases very unique skill sets that the MGA has, and we will continue to use the MGA distribution channel for those risks that where we did not have the best expertise or the best relationships. But for those MGA relationships that were predominantly cat-exposed property we feel confident that we can now access that risk on our own, frankly, with much better granularity, much better control. So the first thing that you need to do is to release the MGAs and then replace that with your own business. That's what we are doing now. We are not looking to reduce property but as Joe put in his prepared remarks, that replacement doesn’t happen at the same time. So over time I would see the property line grow. This scenario where we have a very strong expertise -- and again the events of the last few years, including Sandy continue to demonstrate the need to have specialized, standard and non-standard property coverages and we will participate in that space.

Okay, great, and then quickly just my last one. You talked about the European credit and bond market, I guess as we approach the one-one renewals, just wanted to see if your appetite has changed at all for that business.

Our position in that business hasn’t changed which is that we look at conditional probabilities and we look at pricing. Certainly, as you know, we have been a very large player in that area. It's been a profitable area for us and we appreciate being one of the leaders in the global reinsurance markets for credit and bond business. But the environment that we are in right now is one of higher conditional risk and we believe that an environment of higher conditional risk, you a, manage your exposure and b, require better prices for that risk. To the extent that we don’t know that 2013 will be materially different in outlook. I think a cautious outlook remains appropriate.

Your next question comes from Brian Meredith from UBS.

A couple of quick questions here. First one is just a quick numbers one. Were there any crop losses in last year's third quarter, just for comparability purposes? So I have the $40 million related on a year-over-year basis.

Brian, it's Joe. I don’t have that number to hand but from recollection, I believe we were profitable in crop in 2011. We have got it here, just give us a second, we will pull it out.

The $40 million number, just can you clarify that? That was your total incurred loss from crop or that’s your underwriting loss?

That was the total incurred loss.

So while you are looking up that one, Albert, just one other quick question here. What is currently the breakdown of reinsurance versus primary in your A&H book and then as I look out here, the $300 million goal there, what kind of percentage breakdown would you envision that being reinsurance versus the direct or primary?

The goal is to have a book that is a little bit over half, say 50% plus will be reinsurance and somewhere in the mid to high 40s will be insurance. So we were looking for actually a reasonably balanced book of business. But where we are right now it is a substantially reinsurance loaded. As I look at our numbers right now, I wouldn’t be surprised if it's 80, 20 but I will calculate these numbers right now.

And Brian, just to come back to you, in 2011 our crop premium was $15 million, not very different than what it was this year. Our total loss ratio including IBNR was 56.7%.

Okay, so relatively small. Great.

It stays at 20% of the $150 million of written premium that we have had in 2012 A&H. A little over $30 million is currently insurance, the rest is reinsurance. So 20% is the current number.

[Operator Instruction] Our next question comes from Jay Cohen from Bank of America.

Yes. Just a follow-up on the A&H side. Albert, is that business profitable or do you expect that business to be profitable this year?

Again I think you need to take a look at it from 2 perspectives. I would say the technical ratio versus the G&A ratio. From a G&A ratio, from a technical perspective that business is profitable today. But as you know we have put up a very large infrastructure here that frankly the current G&A load is not yet supported by the volume that we have. So we will continue to growth that and we believe, as we have said before, that the marginal return on the business will be able to absorb all of the G&A by the end of 2013, such that in 2014, we hope that the combined ratio for A&H will in fact be below hundred. But right now, we are satisfied with the technical ratio, if the G&A load, which will over time be spread over a larger premium base.

At this time, I am showing no additional questions. I would like to turn the conference call back over for any closing remarks.

Well, thank you for your attention. Obviously a very strong quarter for us. I think it positions us well for the future. The uncertainty of Sandy will obviously be resolved over the next few weeks. But we are actually looking forward to a very strong 2013. So I look forward to speaking with you soon with more good news. Thank you all.

Ladies and gentlemen, that concludes today's conference call. We do thank you for attending. You may now disconnect your telephone lines.