[Interpreted] Thank you for your question. So the [RMB 380 billion] CapEx figure that we had previously mentioned was a planned figure for a 3-year period. But based on what we're seeing now, and as I just mentioned, the pace at which we can add new servers is insufficient to keep up with the growth in customer orders. So looking at the CapEx situation from where we're at today and of course, there are also supply chain issues to consider as well the pace in which we can build up IDCs and launch new servers is also part of that consideration. But essentially, we're working as fast as we can to be able to satisfy all of that customer demand. In that context, if we're not able to satisfy all of our customer demand especially well with the current pace of investment, then we wouldn't rule out further scaling up that CapEx. But again, that is somewhat dependent on supply chain and availability. But in overall terms, certainly, we will be investing in AI infrastructure aggressively in order to meet the demand of customers. So in big picture terms, I would say that the [RMB 380 billion] figure we had mentioned previously, might be on the small side, certainly in terms of the customer demand that we're currently seeing. The second part of the question had to do with the incremental revenue being driven by these capital expenditures. And if there's some kind of ratio that we can calculate between X amount of CapEx investment and X amount of incremental revenue. And I don't think it's really possible to make that kind of estimate at least for the time being because overall, the AI sector is still in the early phases of its development. And if you look at the different ways that our AI infrastructure is currently being used, that's in flux and spans several different areas, for example, we have servers that are directly rented to customers for training. We have servers that are directly rented to customers for inference. And we're also, of course, using servers ourselves of Bailian for inference as well as for internal applications within the Alibaba Group, like Amap, like Taobao, like Qwen and Quark and transforming these applications into member services or membership-based products for our users. So overall, our AI products and AI infrastructure being used in all these different ways, different kinds of applications, resulting in different revenues and different gross margin levels. So I think in terms of that kind of ratio, you were asking about whatever it is. It certainly wouldn't be stable at this point. I think in the long term, though, what we care about more is that our infrastructure is serving high-quality tokens and providing good cost effectiveness with those tokens.