Good afternoon, and welcome to the BlackBerry Second Quarter Fiscal Year 2023 Results Conference Call. My name is Brent, and I will be your conference moderator for today's call. During the presentation, all participants will be in a listen-only mode. We will be facilitating a brief question-and-answer session towards the end of the conference. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded for replay purposes. I would now like to turn today's call over to Mr. Tim Foote, Vice President of BlackBerry Investor Relations. Sir, please go ahead.

Thank you, Brent. Good afternoon, and welcome to BlackBerry's Second Quarter Fiscal 2023 Earnings Conference Call. With me on the call today are Executive Chair and Chief Executive Officer, John Chen; and Chief Financial Officer, Steve Rai. After I read our cautionary notes regarding forward-looking statements, John will provide business update, and Steve will review the financial results. We will then open the call for a brief Q&A session. This call is available to the general public via call-in numbers and via webcast in the Investor Information section at BlackBerry.com. A replay will also be available on the BlackBerry.com website. Some of the statements we'll be making today constitute forward-looking statements and are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of applicable U.S. and Canadian Securities Laws. We'll indicate forward-looking statements by using words such as expect, will, should, model, intend, believe and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are based on estimates and assumptions made by the Company in light of its experience and its perception of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments as well as other factors that the Company believes are relevant. Many factors could cause the Company's actual results or performance to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. These factors include the risk factors that are discussed in the Company's annual filings and MD&A. You should not place undue reliance on the Company's forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statements are made only as of today, and the Company has no intention and undertakes no obligation to update or revise any of them, except as required by law. As is customary during the call, John and Steve will reference non-GAAP numbers in their summary of our quarterly results. For a reconciliation between our GAAP and non-GAAP numbers, please see earnings press release published earlier today, which is available on EDGAR, SEDAR and BlackBerry.com website. And with that, I'll turn the call over to John.

Thank you, Tim. Good afternoon, everyone, and thanks for joining today's call. This was a solid quarter for BlackBerry, delivering revenue in line with expectations and beats on the earnings. I'll start today with view of the IoT business unit. This quarter, IoT delivered strong 28% year-over-year revenue growth. QNX design-phase revenue remains the top performer. That is revenue from developer -- development fees and professional services. Q1 was the third consecutive quarter that we set an all-time record in this category. And this quarter, we almost set another. When we win a new design, this revenue is the first to be recognized with royalties coming later when a vehicle enters into production. This strength in design-phase revenue is expected to continue, given the significant amount of professional services we already have lined up and the pipeline of potential new design wins in the next few quarters. On the production front, we saw an uptick in royalty revenue, but it remains below the pre-pandemic level, mainly due to supply chain headwinds. Gross margin came in at 82%. The strength of design wins was clearly illustrated by Volkswagen, one of the world's largest automobiles selecting BlackBerry QNX for its new VW.OS platform. This platform will be deployed in all brands across the Volkswagen group with BlackBerry being trusted to power the safety-critical ADAS and autonomous drive applications where QNX is currently the market leader. This builds on design wins in recent quarters with BMW, Volvo and a long list of electric vehicle players in China. BlackBerry continues to win market share in core safety-critical domains. A couple of examples included an ADAS design win with Hyundai and a digital cockpit design with one of the world's largest Tier 1 supplier that utilizes the QNX hypervisors. The hypervisor will host a safety-critical…

Thank you, John. As usual, my comments on our financial performance for the second quarter will be in non-GAAP terms, unless otherwise noted. Total Company revenue for the quarter was $168 million. Total Company gross margin was 64%. Our non-GAAP gross margin excludes stock compensation expense of $1 million. Operating expenses for the second quarter were $129 million. And these non-GAAP operating expenses exclude $22 million in amortization of acquired intangibles, a $10 million fair value gain on the convertible debentures, $5 million in stock compensation expense, $4 million from the impairment of long-term real estate lease assets and $3 million of restructuring expenses. BlackBerry continues to make carefully considered investments for top line growth, such as adding additional headcount to the IoT team in response to our strong schedule of professional services from design wins, as well as expanding our reach in the cyber market, as John outlined earlier. The non-GAAP operating loss for the second quarter was $22 million, and non-GAAP net loss was $29 million. The GAAP basic loss per share was $0.09, and the non-GAAP loss per share was $0.05. Adjusted EBITDA, excluding the non-GAAP adjustments previously mentioned, was negative $16 million. Now, breaking down revenue in the quarter. IoT revenue was $51 million and Cybersecurity revenue was $111 million. Software product revenue remains in the range of 80% to 85% of total revenue, and professional services formed a balance. As before, approximately 80% of software product revenue was recurring. Licensing and other revenue was $6 million. Now, turning to the balance sheet and cash flow. Total cash, cash equivalents and investments were $699 million at August 31, 2022. Free cash flow was negative $26 million with cash used by operations of $23 million and capital expenditures of $3 million. That concludes my comments. I’ll now turn the call back to John.

Thank you, Steve. Before we open the line up for Q&A, let me summarize the key points for the quarter. Number one, our IoT business unit delivered strong year-over-year revenue growth, in large part driven by ongoing strength from design-phase revenue. IVY remains firmly on track with proof-of-concept trials progressing well, and the team is executing on the product development roadmap as planned. Our Cybersecurity business unit, net revenue expectation, delivering strong sequential business growth and continue to implement a strategy to build the business with ARR expected to return to growth early next fiscal year. Despite the volatility in the macro market, we are maintaining our revenue outlook for both business units and continue to execute against our plan. That concludes my remarks. And operator, could you please open the line for Q&A?

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Mike Walkley with Canaccord Genuity. Your line is open.

Hey, Mike.

Thanks. Hey, John. Thanks for taking my question. If you kind of delve in a little bit more to the Cybersecurity business, the billings commentary sounds promising. Can you just update us maybe on the UEM side, kind of where we are and that’s falling off and confidence that gives you that ARR will start to grow next year?

Yes. So the UEM, as you know, it’s a very price-sensitive market on the mid and low-end, and particularly dominated by one major player in the market, including Cylance and so forth. For the higher-end markets, where they absolutely needed better security, we tend to hold on to those businesses well, and in some cases, expand on it. We also have -- in addition to just the UEM, secure communication and also an opportunity to upsell our UES product, too, the Cylance product. So on a whole for the UEM, we kind of expected our sales to holding in pretty flat. And then, we’ll have a way to grow the business next year by bundling some more other stuff and new products that come out and features. The final point I’d like to make is, -- Microsoft, for example, their Intune is really a mobile application manager. This is really not a UEM. So, the customers are beginning to recognize that the security side of the equation, they’re not fulfilling their requirements. So, I think there might be a good strong argument for us to either overcome their tech from Microsoft Intune or actually coexist with them in account that absolutely needed mission-critical security. So, that’s kind of our game plan and our current thinking. And we feel reasonably good about what I just said in terms of where the market validation has been, especially with big customer.

And as a follow-up question, how has pricing in the endpoints security market as you go head-to-head with both legacy and some of the other next-generation vendors? And then, also with the progress on your platform, are you sharing any metrics or give any rough color on how upsell is going and how maybe some of your new customers are landing with more than just one product from Cylance? Thanks.

I get the first part about the legacy. What’s the second part?

It was about platform and the ability to upsell. Is that right, Mike? Platform?

Yes. Just how you’re upselling? Any metrics on customers taking more than one Cylance module?

Oh, I see. I don’t have that information handy with me. So either we’re going to have to follow up with you, and you’ll want to check with John G on those information. And the legacy product line, it’s interesting, we see actually the most progress we made is against the legacy player, particularly in the mid-market, where the mid-market doesn’t really have a CECL, doesn’t have a SOCs what we offer, and particularly Guard, which is the managed service, that’s very well, resonates really well. And we see a pretty big strong growth. The numbers are not huge in terms of the actual amount of dollars, but the number of accounts that we’re winning are reasonably sizable.

Thanks for taking my question. I’ll pass it on.

Thank you.

Thanks.

Your next question is from the line of Luke Junk with Baird. Your line is open.

Hello there.

Good afternoon and thank you for taking the questions. My first question, maybe a little bit of a bigger picture question. John, I’d be curious to get your updated perspective on the auto software competitive landscape in regards to the IoT business. In the last few months here, we’ve seen both companies that haven’t traditionally played in auto looking to make inroads here and in some cases, announcements with customers and some of the chip companies as well talking a bigger game of auto software. Love your thoughts on both, especially any comments that you’d be able to offer on your direct engagement with the chip companies and how that’s evolved or incrementally grown recently? Thank you.

Okay. That’s a good question. So, QNX is probably the biggest player in the auto embedded software space, particularly in the area of operating system. And so, we, by far, touchwood, win most of a big deal. I will refer you to the last two, three quarters of big win in BMW, in Volvo, in Volkswagen and a lot of the electric vehicle players. And because we occupy a pretty unique position on the stack, most people, when you talk about a big company want to get into auto software, they tend to be more on the UI side, user interfaces, more on the infotainment side, but sell them under the core side of the deck. A case in point is the announcement of that we won VW.OS. Volkswagen intends to build their own software stack. They intend to work with just a few players and the chip level up. And so, we are one of the players they take because of operating system. As far as your question -- so we feel pretty good about where we focus and the more mission-critical and safety certified components of our products, and there will be more that will come out. And we have -- just in case you don’t remember this, but we have the highest level of ISO Certification in safety. So, we feel pretty good about our position. As far as the question on chipset, probably the two or three biggest chip players that we work with are very committed to each other for a very long time, and particularly two of them are Qualcomm and NVIDIA. And as you know, Qualcomm and NVIDIA are quite dominant in the auto space. So, we feel very comfortable in both our partnerships and their position in the market and our position in the market that doesn’t overlap. So, I think just being overly -- I don’t want to jinx it obviously, but we feel pretty good. And in addition to that, even players like Google, I think a quarter ago or two quarters ago, has adopted our Hypervisor as their Google Android Auto play. So, that will tell you something about the unique position we occupy. We are not really in contradiction to what they offer.

Okay. Thank you for that elaborated color there. And then, staying within IoT for my follow-up, you recently announced that you’ve gained certification in the aerospace market. And I was just hoping you can expand on the strategic approach to that market. Are there any parts of the market that you’re focusing on initially? How are you investing and resourcing that initiative? And anything similar that would be worth adding? Thank you.

Yes. This is a little early for us, but we do have the intent. And so, when we look at the success in our auto market, it’s really all rely on the highest level of safety certification. So we then -- and we have a new product that comes out that focuses on high level of scalability. And so, if you think about this, and we think about, okay, who else, which vertical exhibit the same requirements, so needed the same requirement. So, medical is one, industrial is one. And we’ve been doing reasonably well on what we call the gen market -- General Embedded Market, which medical and industrial is in there. But we are very interested in the cycle of replacing some of the legacy software in the aerospace, particularly aircraft area. And so, this is why we want to make sure that we’re certified so that developer can reuse the code. And we likely will work through large system integrators like Raytheon and -- of the world, but that’s to the extent that I can share at this point.

Yes, understand and helpful color to just understand where you are headed. Thank you.

All right. Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Paul Treiber with RBC Capital Markets. Your line is open.

Hi, Paul.

Hi, John. Good afternoon. I just wanted to follow up on your previous comments about auto software. What’s changed in your mind in terms of the mentality of these auto OEMs and even Google to adopt QNX as a foundational layer?

Well, it’s a -- so first of all, QNX, the operating system has been in the business for over 30 years. And you all remember that -- I mean some of us, not all remember that. But, it was way back when it was the infotainment company, it’s actually belonged to Harman. And BlackBerry bought it before my time. They bought it and was kind of creating an operating system with it. So, the safety certification has always been the claim to fame. And they want a lot of infotainment. So, what we have done since the time I arrived, what we have done is to expand from infotainment into areas of more safety-oriented and security-oriented applications actually related to a car. And, of course, then in parallel, the world started to move towards the software-defined vehicle. So, therefore, the OEMs are taking more control of the design, the stack, the software stack, okay? But they also know that they can’t just sit there and replicate their operating system and get it certified. Now, some people try to use the Auto Grade Linux, AGL, but AGL couldn’t get it certified, and it’s an open source also with a -- has its own business challenges to it. So, they gradually all came back to the QNX. And that’s the reason why. And then, being -- having over 200 million cars that use our software today actively, it will present a pretty sizable market for a lot of other players to ignore, so -- or a player to be ignored. So, this is why Google works with us and Qualcomm works with us and NVIDIA works with us, and TI works with us, and ARM works with us, and it’s a long list of players that all use us, as a said foundational piece. And then we’ll continue to expand application or different types of features in that foundation piece.

That’s helpful. And it leads into my next question. Like, how do you think about the economics within the foundational layer? And what’s the strategy to try to maximize economics over the long term?

It’s -- well, our strategy is obviously use more of our foundational modules in the stack. And so, that’s the basic strategy. And then, if you have multiple copies and then as we get deeper into the engine and deeper into the safety side of the equation of a car operation, it will -- QNX will be able to demand -- or command a little bit more ARPU. So, we have more copies and higher-value copies like Hypervisor is -- have a higher value than infotainment, for example. That’s kind of -- move up the stack in ARPU and broaden it to be multiple copies in the car. It’s our strategy in general for the business strategy side. And then, don’t forget IVY, because IVY is our next-generation push into edge-to-cloud. And it not only provides security and privacy, it also provides economics because cloud-only solution is too expensive, and it’s too much data being generated along the operation of a car. So, don’t forget about that. So, we feel that we have a pretty good one, two, three punches on the auto space or at least on the IoT side, and we’re going to expand it beyond auto, as I said. But today, we’re very focused on auto.

And just -- if I can just squeeze in one more. Just in regard to the patent portfolio, I mean, I know it’s -- you’re limited in terms of what you can say. But how should we think about the time frame? Like the clock is ticking in terms of the ability to monetize the patents. As the time goes on, does the value of the patents decrease to you or to a potential buyer, or is there a way to get back damages, per se or back royalties and so the time is less critical?

Yes. And so, there are two data points, you already answered one, which is those that needed our license, will have to address the past deployment. So, it’s not just time ticking away and therefore -- so that’s one of the answer to your question. The other one is there is a miss [ph] out there about the time. There was an article published, it’s factually incorrect, and it’s factually incorrectly throughout -- almost throughout the entire article about the number of years for our portfolio and the value of that. That is absolutely not true. Because if it had been true, then it wouldn’t have to be syndicated still wanting to make this thing happen. So, I will just leave it at as that. I don’t want to do a public debate with the writer, but I’m sorry, the writer is absolutely wrong. Even though this article has been around for a little while, and this was reprint by a newspaper that would like to, I guess, sensationalize something that is not true. And anyway, I’ll leave it at that. So, yes, we could have capture the past deployment and no, it’s not that shorter life.

Okay. Thank you for clarifying.

Absolutely.

Your next question is from the line of Todd Coupland with CIBC. Your line is now open.

Hey, Todd.

Hey there, John. Good evening.

Hi, Todd.

Hey there. Good evening. I wanted to ask you about the cyber unit. You indicated you still expect revenue to be roughly flat year-on-year, but implied in that comment is a seasonal uptick in the fourth quarter. And I’m just wondering, is that also still expected in line with prior expectations. And I just wanted you to close the logic on that point with growth expected early in fiscal 2024?

Earlier in fiscal 2024? Okay.

Well, you commented on ARR growth expected early next year.

Yes. Of course. Of course. So, it’s a little bit of a complicated set of math, but I’ll focus on the kind of the high level. So, yes, our Q4 pipeline is a lot more bigger than Q3. And so, we believe that therefore my statement about the revenue relatively flat in line with the last fiscal year, it’s a proper statement. And then there will be some billings growth because of that. And then we also take a look at what the -- where the headwinds are. And if you look at all the headwinds from all the deals that we expected to either get or renewed and ones that are being attacked, especially the mid-market state, we believe that the major part of our headwind is behind us, will be behind us after Q4. Sorry, I should say that because we kind of look through it on a quarterly basis. So therefore, next fiscal year, I don’t know whether it’s Q1 or definitely Q2, that we expect ARR to have a year-over-year increase, and we should continue that trend going forward. Does that answer your question?

Yes. That’s clear. And on that point, just remind us what you think the potential growth in cyber is, once you start to benefit from improved product bundling and go-to-market?

You saw the three-year plan that we put out -- three- and five-year plan for the release are. In fact, I had recently presented to the Board, we have not deviated from that -- deviating from that at all. So, you could see that from a John G group, the Cyber Security group, the compounded annual growth should be roughly about 10%. So, that will be what we will focus on getting.

Okay. Thank you very much for the clarification.

Sure. Of course.

Your final question comes from the line of Trip Chowdhry with Global Equities Research. Your line is open.

Hi, Trip.

Thank you. Very solid execution in a brutal environment. Two questions. First, I had this regarding your Volkswagen deal, which is very significant. Can you give me some directional guidance in a sense that or some metrics like you won the design -- it’s a design win, what should we be thinking in terms of production revenues once these vehicles go into production? How should we think, is it 1x, 2x, 3x the design win revenues? Is production usually more than design wins? Any color on that will be helpful. And then, I have a follow-up question.

Okay. So in general -- I’ll speak to auto because our backlog numbers are based on the auto. So, in general, if you look at a cycle of an auto win somewhere between 7 to 10 years, so what we will see upfront is that probably on an overall -- let’s say, a deal brings us $1 million. I’m making this up, okay, on total lifetime. Obviously, it’s a lot bigger than that, but let’s just start with $1 million. So, I would say the 10% upfront probably is something that we should expect and could expect on development seats. And then, probably there are some professional services revenue. So, I will put it again in the range of 5% to 10%. Now, the bulk of the production will come in year normally four, five, six, seven, eight. However, we see that compressing because of all the -- because we’re going electrified, right, the electrification. The electric vehicle market turns the product cycle a lot faster and particularly with the Chinese. The Chinese is turning it around a cycle of 3 to 5 years instead of 7 to 10. So -- and everybody else will probably have to keep up. Now, whether they will get to three or five years, who knows. But it will shorten the seven to 10 years. So, we get a little bit of upfront, which is always nice. And then, we get some professional services, and then we will get the production royalty.

Excellent. Now, I was also wondering, you have a very solid offering in terms of IVY. And today, you mentioned the hybrid approach that is in cloud and on device, which is a vehicle, which is, I think, very novelty -- very novel, because you don’t want the OEM to be finalized for success where the success means more data. And if the whole objective is to put the data into the cloud, you, that is, BlackBerry shouldn’t or the OEM shouldn’t be like a reseller of AWS. So, I like that strategy big time. But I was wondering if you, that is, if there’s a customer who is like Volkswagen, which is already standardized on OS, are there any plans you may have to make migration or at least experimentation with IVY, like just a mouse click away? Do we have anything like that in plans? And that’s all for me. Thank you very much.

Yes. That’s a good question. I don’t want to turn this into an announcement but let me just say that it is logical. It will be -- maybe put it differently. It will be illogical for BlackBerry not to take advantage of all the assets. And there is a good reason why both IVY and QNX is in the same IoT group.

Very good.

Thanks. Thank you.

I would now like to turn the call back over to John Chen, Executive Chair and CEO of BlackBerry for closing remarks.

Well, thank you. Thank you, operator. Before we conclude today’s call, I’d like to remind everyone about upcoming BlackBerry Security Summit on October 27th, in that particularly assess the keynote addresses with BlackBerry executives, customer-led case studies, interactive talk on cybersecurity innovation and best practice from BlackBerry Research and Intelligence team and more, all virtual and all on-demand. Investors could register for the event on the Investor page of our BlackBerry.com website. And I want to thank you all for joining our call. I’m sorry there’s always late in the East Coast. And I truly appreciate it. Thank you and see you next time.

This concludes today's call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.