Good afternoon and welcome to the BlackBerry Second Quarter Fiscal Year 2024 Results Conference Call. My name is Rocco, and I will be your conference moderator for today's call. During the presentation, all participants will be in a listen-only mode. We will be facilitating a brief question-and-answer session towards the end of the conference. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded for replay purposes. I would now like to turn today's call over to Tim Foote, Vice President of BlackBerry Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Rocco. Good afternoon and welcome to BlackBerry's second quarter 2024 earnings conference call. With me on the call today are Executive Chair and Chief Executive Officer, John Chen; and Chief Financial Officer, Steve Rai. After I read our cautionary note regarding forward-looking statements, John will provide a business update and Steve will review the financial results. We will then open the call for a brief Q&A session. This call is available to the general public via call-in numbers and via webcast in the Investor Information section at blackberry.com. A replay will also be available on the blackberry.com website. Some of the statements we'll be making today constitute forward-looking statements and are made pursuant to the Safe Harbor provisions of applicable US and Canadian securities laws. We'll indicate forward-looking statements by using words such as expect, will, should, model, intend, believe, and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are based on estimates and assumptions made by the company in light of its experience and its perception of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments as well as other factors that the company believes are relevant. Many factors could cause the company's actual results or performance to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. These factors include the risk factors that are discussed in the company's annual filings and MD&A. You should not place undue reliance on the company's forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statements are made only as of today, and the company has no intention and undertakes no obligation to update or revise any of them, except as required by law. As is customary, during the call, John and Steve will reference non-GAAP numbers in their summary of our quarterly results. For reconciliation between our GAAP and non-GAAP numbers, please see the earnings press release published earlier today, which is available on the EDGAR, SEDAR, and blackberry.com websites. And with that, I'll turn the call over to John.

Thanks, Tim. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us today. Let me start with the IoT business unit. Revenue for the quarter increased 9% sequentially to $49 million, and gross margin increased by 400 basis point to 84%. The most important long-term leading indicator of the health of this business is securing new design wins and building royalty backlog and we have -- and that we had another strong quarter. In fact, by the end of the first half, we have secured more than two-thirds of our FY24 annual targets for new backlog and expect to exceed it. In the quarter, QNX secured 20 new design wins in auto and seven in general embedded market verticals. The largest of these was an eight-figure estimate lifetime revenue ADAS win with one of the top five global automakers to deploy our QNX OS for safety. This wins illustrate a strong secular trend of consolidation of software into centralized compute domains. With this ADAS module powering drive monitoring, surround view, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, and other safety features all on a single chip. As automotive software stacks becomes more complex and requires significantly higher compute power, it plays to the QNX strength. In addition to our strong win-rate for ADAS, we are also the clear market leader for foundational software in the digital carpet. The combination of our high-performance, safety-critical RTOS and hypervisors allows for mixed criticality in this domain. Given our market leading positions, our design wins continue to be well diversified across all major global markets. In Asia, we secure design wins with LG Electronics that include our hypervisor will be deployed in a number of vehicle models for a top 10 global automakers. We also secure wins with Vision and leading OEM Cherry via Bosch among…

Thank you, John. As usual, my comments on our financial performance for the second quarter will be in non-GAAP terms unless otherwise noted. Total company revenue for the quarter was $132 million. IOT revenue was $49 million, cybersecurity revenue was $79 million, and licensing revenue was $4 million. Software product revenue as a percentage of total revenue remained in the range of 85% to 90% with professional services making up the balance. The percentage of software product revenue that was recurring remained at approximately 90%. Total company gross margin was 65%. Operating expenses for the second quarter were $114 million, lower sequentially in part due to one-time costs associated with the patent sale in Q1 that did not recur and the release of some IP related accruals in Q2. Non-GAAP operating expenses exclude, 6 million fair value gain on the convertible debentures, 10 million in amortization of acquired intangibles, 10 million in stock-based compensation expense, 3 million in restructuring expenses, and 1 million in impairment of long-lived assets. The non-GAAP operating loss was $28 million and non-GAAP net loss for the second quarter was $23 million. The $0.04 non-GAAP basic loss per share for the quarter beat expectations. Adjusted EBITDA, excluding the non-GAAP adjustments previously mentioned was negative $22 million. BlackBerry remains laser focused on maximizing efficiency and expanding margins and we remain on course for both positive operating cash flow and non-GAAP EPS in the fourth quarter and for the fiscal year as a whole. Total cash, cash equivalents and investments decreased by $59 million to $519 million as at August 31, 2023. Net cash used by operations this quarter was $56 million. The current debentures mature in November and we intend to fully repay them. With respect to raising any new debt, the outcome of Project Imperium will obviously have a significant bearing on future needs. Accordingly, we are developing clear executable plans for a number of potential scenarios that could arise. That concludes my comments and I'll turn the call back to John.

Thank you, Steve. Before we open the line for Q&A, let me quickly summarize the key messages. While this quarter saw some volatility in reported revenue due to slip deal. We remain confident in the pipeline of opportunities for our cyber business. We expect this to translate into a much stronger second half and subject to successfully closing a number of our larger government opportunities we expect to finish within our reiterated full year revenue range for cyber. We also remain very confident and excited about the fundamentals of our IoT business. And like cyber, expect a stronger second half, albeit we're taking a prudent view given delay in the start of some development programs as well as the auto industry labor actions. Then we also provide you an update regarding Project Imperium. The board and its advisors are very actively engaged in the process and recognize that it is in everyone's interest that it will be completed as soon as possible. All stakeholders should rest assured that we will provide an update as soon as we possibly can. That concludes my prepared remarks. We will now take your questions. Operator, could you please open the line for Q&A.

Absolutely. We will now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] And ladies and gentlemen, our first question today comes from Mike Walkley with Canaccord Genuity. Please go ahead.

Hey, Mike.

Hey, John. Thank you for taking my question. The first one is just really on the cybersecurity business. Can you provide a little more granularity on which parts of the cybersecurity driving these big perpetual government contracts that you expect to close, is it mainly Secusmart or is it kind of evenly spread across the portfolio?

Mainly Secusmart, also UEM, the Spark platform. So mainly those two.

Great. Thank you. And then I guess on my follow-up question, just any update on how Cylance is trending in the market? You have some good technology there, but some larger companies such as CrowdStrike and others are moving more into the SMB market. Can you maybe talk about how Cylance is faring in the marketplace?

Yeah, we do actually reasonably well. The numbers are obviously smaller than the competitors, but we do reasonably well in the win rates on SMB. We actually have a pretty good quarters in new logos. And it will continue, you know, I said it many times, you know, our products are now up to class, took us a while. We are working very hard with channel partners to swing them our way. And so once we have more achievement there we'll have more leverage, but clearly the product could win and Guard is a good solution.

That's helpful. Thanks for taking my two questions. I'll pass the line.

Sure. Thank you.

Thank you. And our next question today comes from Luke Junk with Baird. Please go ahead.

Good afternoon. Thanks for taking the questions. John, for starters, last few quarters here, customer software delays have been a theme that we've seen repeat a few times. It would just be great to get your perspective on how widespread this issue is in your customer bases right now and most importantly, what the effective customers are telling you needs to get done to get back on track. You mentioned in the script that you have confidence this will be a relatively short-term timing issue. Could you just expand on the reasons why you believe that to be the case? Thank you.

Right, okay. That's a good question. So the company that are looking at their software-defined vehicle effort and to push out some and delay the either the start of the design so starting into the production are the really big companies. And some of them are very visible. They announced, you know, re-org, that actually the outcome favors the software-defined vehicles strategy. Toyota has announced re-org. VW has announced re-org. And I mean a number of others that we have not announced re-org and then pardon me for not being able to repeat that because that's customer proprietary information. So they will not be happy with me. So you could guess that sense. However, everybody has kind of tell us, it's like a, you know, not in a precision way, but it's kind of like a one year move, four quarter move. And frankly speaking, we are in the third of the four quarter already. So this is one of the reason why the team has some really strong pipeline that they believe in for Q4. And as I want to repeat this, we expect Q4 the best quarter in revenue for QNX ever.

Okay, great. Thank you for that, John. And then for my follow-up, I'll stay within IoT. Going back to the Analyst Day earlier this year, one of the things that you mentioned strategically was looking to continue to engage more directly with OEMs as a Tier 1 and accelerating your OEM account coverage. I'm just wondering to what extent the current delays you're seeing impact your appetite for those sorts of investments in IoT that are outward facing and just reconcile that with the overall desire to expand margin. Thank you.

Right, we have, because we believe our fundamentals are so strong and because we believe our new product, 8.0 scalability is so good. We are not slowing down any of our appetite at all. We are steadfast moving forward. IoT is hiring people. So we don't worry about us kind of taking our foot off the gas pedal. That's not going to happen.

Understood. Thank you.

Sure.

And our next question today comes from Trip Chowdhry with Global Equities Research. Please go ahead.

Hi, Trip.

Thank you very much. Hello, John. The auto industry seems to be super exciting with QNX and now at least companies like NXP, they term something like you talk IoT as Edge Square, where they put a lot of AI and they call tiny ML that powers these devices. I was wondering, like QNX definitely with the low footprint and real time operating system is ideal. But I was also wondering, have you come across some new sensors, the categories that may have been created because of AI in the Edge and these neural network processors like NXP that they make. The industry is trying to -- industry structure is changing. That's my basic question is a tiny ML, Edge Square, QNX and some new use cases that may be evolving. So I was wondering if you have any thoughts on that?

Yeah, it's a good point. I think it's still, what you're explaining, I read it, it's still early in the industry. And I also want to emphasize the fact that we are an embedded operating system, real-time secure operating systems. And so we tend to go into the MPU type, the central complex, computing complex. So the Edge of this, which will be driven with different new use cases, some of them are AI based and all that, but that's a level higher than us. So and of course we will be benefiting from it from needing more central compute power. So I guess we do benefit from it. We don't directly go create a selling motion into the Edge. And that Edge selling motion and use cases are created by the code that is on the stack, that is one level above us.

Excellent.

Is that makes sense?

Yes, I got it. The second question is regarding IVY, phenomenal traction on the developer side, apps, I don't know, probably we are about six, eight months away from it. But I was wondering, have you come across any new categories of apps that may be coming on top of IVY? And that's all for me. Thank you very much.

Well, the AI and sensing, actually interesting, back to your first question. You know, the different type of sensors that's being demanded in a car, you know, we have seen, different types and more increased and more complex. And like one of the example when I talk about CorrActions was they monitor the sensors on the steering wheel. And then through that, they monitor and they help define the micro muscles of the individual. So and then dictate or indicates what the status of the driver. So on an alertness basis and awareness basis. So this is a little bit more esoteric than just, you know, measure whether the, you know, how much gas you have in the tank or how much charging amps that you still have before you need to do the next charge. So we have seen more and more modern type applications, but I still believe for the initial usage of IVY, it's going to be very fundamentally managing the safety and the comfort of the car.

Got it. Thank you so much.

Thank you, Trip.

And our next question today comes from Paul Treiber with RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Hi, Paul. Good afternoon.

Hi, John. Good afternoon. Just in regards to your comments about Q4 being the best quarter for IoT, how do we think about the momentum beyond Q4 like do you expect it to be carried through to the subsequent year or is it more just a one-quarter phenomenon?

No. So it's a good question. I don't believe we're going to have a Q1 FY25 bigger than Q4. That's what you're asking. But I do believe that we're still following the 20% growth on year-over-year where we presented to you all in the May meeting. So you do expect us to have double-digit growth and pushing to a 20% growth year-over-year. And by then I hope that these so-called software-define vehicle efforts delay. And hopefully, everybody seems to have a reasonable handles on supply chain despite of the political situation between US, China, Western world and so forth. And so that's gradually getting under control. Electrification is on everybody's, it's in their product's backs so to speak. Although to us it's really hoping that that drive more volume of a car, not so much as electric versus gas, we have a difference there. And so if that is removed then we will start seeing design wins that will turn into developer seats to kind of professional services engagement and then ultimately turn into royalty backlog, royalty. So fundamentally we see nothing concerning at all. We see this as a purely a timing issues And we see it starting to get better in Q4, unless there are some other industry events like the UAW strikes that last longer, then that's a little bit out of our control. But even though, even the UAW strikes, it's not going to last, as you probably know this very well, it's not going to last in perpetuity and because both sides got hurt. So I think they will resolve it. I certainly hope they will and then we'll get back on track.

Okay. And then my second question. I don't know how much you can answer it, but I'll throw it out there. Just in regards to Project Imperium, I know you can't give specifics, but have you or the board reached a point where you've narrowed down to a few high-level paths? And can you sort of share the high-level paths?

Yes. I can't comment on it, but the answer is yes.

Okay. Thanks for taking the questions.

Sure.

And our next question today comes from Daniel Chan with TD Cowan. Please go ahead.

Hey, John. You expected the strategic review to conclude by the end of summer, and your contract with BlackBerry is quickly approaching, would it be possible that this review goes past November or should we expect something in the next month or so?

I think there's better than 50-50 chance you should expect something sooner.

Okay. That's helpful. And then maybe another question on the timing. To what extent do you think the uncertainty from the strategic reviews having an impact on the near term financial performance, whether it be from staff productivity or even customers waiting for a conclusion?

No, actually, I mean, really seriously, I check this a lot, because that's an obvious concern. And from a customer point of view, no, I don't see, there might be one or two conversations I had, but it was like, kind of like, oh, by the way, when I talked to a customer, they said, oh, by the way, what's good, you know, what's going on there, you know, that kind of thing. And, or somebody asked me, part of the long conversation and all of a sudden they said, should I be concerned about this? I said, nope, nope, you have nothing to be concerned about. We stand behind everything we do and build and deliver. So not much really coming from and the sales floor hasn't fed back to me about this being a roadblock of some sorts. But having said that, the longer it lingers on, the worse it's going to get. And even though it is not a big, big worse. So I have no intention, because of being an operator, I got employees, partners, customers, shareholders to worry about. So we're not going to let this thing. It might take a long time, multiple steps, but there will be some decision made.

That's helpful. Thanks, John.

Sure.

Thank you. I would like to turn the call back over to John Chen, Executive Chair and CEO of BlackBerry for closing remarks.

Okay, thank you. Thank you, operator. Before we end today's call, I'd like to remind everyone of an upcoming BlackBerry Summit on October 17 at the Conrad Hotel in New York Downtown. The event anchored around the theme of trust has been expanded this year to include IOT and we have a strong line of keynotes as well as product demos and breakout sessions. You can register to attend at blackberry.com/ summit. Stay tuned for more announcement around the event. I thank everybody again for joining the call. I look forward to speaking with you very soon. Thank you.

And thank you sir. This concludes today's call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.