So this is Marcus. Thank you for the question. For me, when I look at a valuable asset like the database, understanding the construct of it and the cleanliness of it is probably first and foremost. And when we made the Bed Bath & Beyond acquisition, we picked up a very large database. But understanding what a large database looks like, it's important to understand the quality of that database and the segmentation of it. So putting people in the right categories at the right time, offering them the right products improves efficiency. Today, in my opinion, we are basically just spraying the database with every single offer that we have. And we need to do a better job of understanding who that customer is, what their historical purchases are, creating some predictive logic around what their next purchases could be, understanding their address and their home better to understand size of property, square footage of home, number of rooms in the house and what the things are that are going to speak directly to them. Too often, customers forget to curate a message or an offer specifically to its individual consumer. And when they do that, they end up exhausting the database, creating fatigue and having people either not come back and do business or opt out of the relationship because they don't feel like it's customized to them. When you do these things, you should expect to yield more from that customer over a 12-month period. As Dave mentioned, our goal is to increase the frequency of visits to 2 and to expand the offering to them by looking to generate a higher AOV. The process has already started. We've engaged with a leading database provider [indiscernible]. It is our expectation within 30 days, we'll have done the deduping of those households, and then it will be implemented into our CRM. This is a now task, not a tomorrow task. And the primary reason for doing it, in addition to growing revenue is we need to take costs out of this company. This company cannot spend north of 13% as a percentage of revenue, driving revenue. Every 1% is meaningful to the bottom line, and we take that seriously. In fact, at $2 billion, 1% represents $20 million. We know that when we look at a $200-plus million marketing budget, there has to be inefficiency in it. And it's not about just trimming that expense. It's about taking that savings and reinvesting it in growth. That is why we believe that by the end of '25, we could be at a $3 billion run rate as we launch these other brands. So it's a now thing.