Good morning, and welcome to Brunswick Corporation's First Quarter 2024 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Today's meeting will be recorded. If you have any objections, you may disconnect at this time. I would now like to introduce Neha Clark, Senior Vice President, Enterprise Finance, Brunswick Corporation. Thank you, and you may now begin.

Good morning, and thank you for joining us. With me on the call this morning are Dave Foulkes, Brunswick's CEO; and Ryan Gwillim, CFO. Before we begin with our prepared remarks, I would like to remind everyone that during this call, our comments will include certain forward-looking statements about future results. Please keep in mind that our actual results could differ materially from these expectations. For details on these factors to consider, please refer to our recent SEC filings and today's press release. All of these documents are available on our website at brunswick.com. During our presentation, we will be referring to certain non-GAAP financial information. Reconciliations of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures are provided in the appendix to this presentation and the reconciliation sections of the unaudited consolidated financial statements accompanying today's results. I will now turn the call over to Dave.

Thanks, Neha, and good morning, everyone. Brunswick had a solid start to the year, delivering sales margin and adjusted earnings per share consistent with expectations, despite continued customer caution in the face of the economic uncertainty. Our performance benefited from continued market share gains, the wealth of recently launched and well-received new products and comprehensive cost control measures across our businesses, offset by higher promotions and discounts on some product lines. We also continue to make good progress on our strategic initiatives. Our first quarter net sales of $1.4 billion and adjusted earnings per share of $1.35 were in line with our guidance range and consistent with the anticipated restrained, early season, marine dealer OEM and retail wholesale auto patterns, which drove reduced production rates across our product businesses compared to the first quarter of 2023 when pipelines were being filled. Mercury Marine continued to capture market share with first quarter U.S. outboard retail share, up 200 basis points versus prior year. Our early season boat unit retail performance is tracking with our outlook of flat to 2023. As we move into the core 2024 retail selling season, we continue to work closely with our channel partners to maintain balanced current model field inventory levels and we closed the first quarter with 36.1 weeks on hand in the U.S., which is in line with historical norms. In addition, during the quarter, we successfully completed a debt issuance of $400 million to cover the refinance of our only near-term debt, further solidifying our cash position and balance sheet. I'll now turn to some segment highlights for the quarter. Our propulsion business delivered lower sales and earnings versus a record first quarter of 2023 as boat manufacturers and dealers moderated order patterns and managed production of current model year products and pipelines…

Thanks, Dave, and good morning, everyone. Brunswick delivered a solid first quarter, consistent with guided expectations despite a continued cautious macroeconomic environment. versus a strong first quarter 2023, net sales in the quarter were down 22%, resulting in an adjusted EPS of $1.35. Gross margins have remained resilient. Adjusted operating expenses were down $11 million versus Q1 2023, and free cash flow performed better than anticipated as CapEx spending continues to moderate given the conclusion of several major capital projects in 2023. First quarter sales were below prior year as the impact of continued measured wholesale ordering patterns by dealers and OEMs, coupled with higher discounts in some business segments was only partially offset by annual price increases, market share gains and benefits from well-received new products. Adjusted operating earnings were down versus prior year as a result of the impact of lower net sales, unfavorable changes in foreign exchange rates and slightly higher input costs, which more than offset benefits from significant cost control measures throughout the enterprise. Now we'll take a look at each reporting segment, starting with our propulsion business. Sales and earnings were lower as anticipated as boat manufacturers and dealers moderated order patterns managing production of current model year products and pipelines ahead of the retail season and model year change. However, Mercury continued to gain outboard engine share, as Dave discussed earlier, and together with the impacts of 2023 pricing gains and aggressive cost control measures, partially offset the impact of lower sales, unfavorable changes in foreign currency exchange rates, the lapping of prior year favorable variances related to timing of capitalized inventory and lower absorption from reduced production. The engine parts and accessories business continued its steady performance with sales and earnings down modestly from the first quarter of 2023 as anticipated, but…

Thanks, Ryan. We launched an extraordinary 25 new products across our businesses and brands during the quarter. representing an important contributor to near-term and future growth. Now I'd like to highlight just a subset. At the Miami International Boat Show, we introduced some exciting additions to the FliteBoard product line. The Flite AIR and Flite AIR PRO are the most attainable models in the brand portfolio and are enablers to expanding participation to a broader set of consumers, allowing significantly more people to enjoy the flight boarding experience. Mercury expanded its joystick control technology to a broader set of single-engine board applications. Its Joystick steering for single-engine vessels is compatible with the Mercury Verado family of V8, V10 and V12 outboard engines from 250 to 600 horsepower. Mercury also launched the fourth and fifth models in the expanding Avator electric outboard product line. The 75e and 110e are the most powerful models introduced to date. We're also very excited about the many new boat models launched across our boat brands. including the new award-winning Boston Whaler 365 Conquest and Harris 250 Crowne, which both debuted at first quarter boat shows and feature Mercury high horsepower outboard engine and advanced Simrad electronics. We are seeing a very positive response to the recently launched Simrad NSX Ultrawide, which is the industry's first full functionality, high-definition multifunction display, and showcases the seamless interface of the latest Simrad Android operating system. In addition, we launched the new Lowrance Eagle, which is the latest offering in the brand's entry level fishfinder/chartplotter lineup and features improved clarity and depth performance through high-definition sonar. And finally, we continue to expand our Boateka-certified pre-owned boat business with the opening of the newest Tampa location which is strategically located near Freedom Boat Club's largest corporate territories in Tampa Bay and Southwest Florida. Boteka's newest location will service the facility to accelerate certified pre-owned sales across the Southwest Florida region. Before we conclude, I'm thrilled to highlight the exceptional accomplishments of our teams from across the enterprise that were recognized with a record high number of awards in the first quarter. Brunswick was named to Forbes' 2024 America's Best Large Employers list for the sixth consecutive year. And also named to Newsweek's list of the most trustworthy companies in America for the second consecutive year. Brunswick innovation also continues to be recognized, including with the Consumer Electronics Show Innovation Award the Mercury Avator 20e and 35e electric outboard motors. And we received many awards for our products, innovation, customer service and marketing at early season boat shows including a record 16 total awards at the Miami Boat Show. Thank you again to all our talented Brunswick employees who make this recognition possible. That's the end of our prepared remarks. We'll now open the line for questions.

[Operator Instructions] And our first question is from the line of James Hardiman with Citi.

I wanted to dig in a little bit on the retail commentary, favorite topic, trying to tease out the industry data versus what you think is right. So just so I'm clear, your internal -- the internal boat data for Brunswick suggests that you guys are flat. But you don't think the industry is flat year-to-date. That's more a commentary of how you think the industry is going to be for the year. Just wanted to make sure I understand that. And then I guess just more broadly, as I'm sure you're aware, your biggest customer put guidance for the second straight time today. And in particular, they seem to be surprised by the retail momentum so far this year. So just trying to connect those 2 dots. You guys seem to think that retail is going very much as planned. They seem to be surprised by the weakness. So help us understand.

Yes. Thanks, James. Yes, a couple of things, I guess. You're correct. Our internal retail is essentially flat for the year, including in the first couple of weeks of April. And you're right. There's often a dislocation at this time of year, in particular, between SSI industry data, which I'm sure you saw is down about 10% in the main powerboat segment versus our internal retail. SSI suggests that industry is down 10% and Brunswick down about 5%. So we would be dislocated by something like the 5% for Brunswick. I think the -- because a couple of things in the first quarter in particular, which is about 15%, I think, of the total year, we're talking about relatively small numbers with a wider spread. And then I think for the first quarter, there's a particular phenomenon where I think SSI registrations, you would think would somewhat leak into the following months of the next quarter, but they would be compensated by leakage from the last month of the prior quarter. But in the first quarter, the leakage from Q4 2023 is very low because the sales are extremely low in Q4. So I think that the leakage tends to be more out into Q2 and less into Q1 versus the end of the prior year. So I think that's probably at least part of the phenomenon. Of course, we can't say exactly what -- independently, what the total industry is doing. We think we are gaining some share, which we noted about 50 basis points. But the -- but I think that's unlikely to fully account for the SSI to internal retail delta. And we expect, as usual, that they will -- the gap will close as we go forward.

Got it. And then the point on your biggest retailer, just sort of the disconnect. And I would add a lot of retailers sound a lot more negative than you guys on the first 3, 3.5 months of the year? Any thoughts on what feels at least in terms of tone like a bit of a disconnect.

Yes. Obviously, I can't speak for them. But I would say that we would probably both agree. I expect we'd agree that sales of our product -- our premium product lines, which, of course, they're a big part of Sea Ray, Whaler, to some extent, our Harris Pontoon brand, but mainly Sea Ray and Whaler. I don't know what they said about it, but sales of Sea Ray and Whaler have been strong. So if there is a weakness in other parts, I don't know exactly what those parts are and how I might account for it. I would tell you it's very clear that Sea Ray and Whaler had a good Q1 as reflected in sales at Miami, for example, and Dusseldorf that we published.

Got it. And if I could just sneak in one more. Next month, 6 weeks are going to be critical. What are you looking at most closely? I feel like us as analysts may become sort of weatherman this time of year. And for you guys, in particular, given the P&A business, the weather seems like it's critical. But maybe walk us through what you need to see or don't want to see in the context of your ability to hit the full year numbers.

I mean, weather is there, but I don't think it's one of the major factors we're looking at and that there's some extreme situation that's unanticipated. We'll be looking internally at order rates which will be -- for example, Mercury and Navico Group, which will be driven by production rates at mainly our OEM customers. To some extent, we'll be looking at order rates from retailers for P&A and other things, including for Navico. But really, I think as we go into the model year right now, I think the industry overall is pretty healthy proportion of current model product about -- I think about 75% of product in inventories is current model year versus the prior model year, which is pretty decent. But as you approach during the first and the model year changeover, obviously, this is a period where they will be relatively trying to minimize additional current model year products. When we cross into June, we would hope and expect to see an acceleration. Because they'll have to live with a '25 model year product for the next year, obviously. In a very promotional environment -- more promotional environment as we see at the moment, obviously, the penalty of carrying prior model year product is higher than it would be in a less promotional environment, because they are adding discounts to clear prior model year product once they go into June and beyond. So we would expect -- we refer to this issue of trying to understand exactly when the point of inflection is going to be. We would expect it to be a little bit more abrupt this year maybe than in the past few years just because the promotional environment really penalizes people for holding prior model year, current model year versus accelerating with new. But we'll be looking -- back to your question, we'll be looking at order rates from OEM customers primarily.

That's really good color. Thanks, and good luck for the next few weeks and months.

Next question is from the line of Scott Stember with ROTH MKM.

Have you seen any change on the credit side, whether it's the creditworthiness of customers coming in? And have you seen any tightening at the retail side on a credit perspective.

We have seen people with high credit scores coming back into the market with financing a bit more than we saw in recent periods, I would say. So I would say, yes, people with good credit scores are coming back and financing a little bit more than they were in prior periods. Credit tightening. I don't think there's any particular tightening at the moment. We're in a relatively stable period, I would say, and have been for the last probably 6 months, I would say, in terms of rates and credit score requirements.

Got it. And then over to -- on the parts side. It looks like sell-in was down 3%. It looks like the RV side is picking back up a little bit. But could you maybe talk about what you're seeing in POS, actual retail demand, what's being pulled through for both?

Yes. I think the retail demand is still -- is pretty solid. And with our products business was down a little bit by 3%, but it's supposed to flat as it's going to be probably. I think what we're seeing really on the P&A distribution business is a bit of a reflection of what we're seeing in all of our retail channels, which is people know the product is available. And so they're not inclined to build as much inventory at the moment. Obviously, they're watching their own balance sheets. So I just think that we're seeing the effect of ready availability on people's willingness to stock at the moment. I don't think there's anything probably more to it than that.

No. The only thing I would point out also is our Brownsburg, Indiana facility is running at almost 100% capacity. It's up and running, and we have put behind us the kind of startup periods. And that efficiency is allowing us to service all of our customers a little bit better. But certainly, our international customers are able to get product quicker. Inventory levels in the channel seem to be quite normal. And so we would anticipate given we're lapping periods of a little bit slower time to the end of last year that the next 3 quarters for P&A should be growth quarters.

Got it. And just one quick last question. David, you talked about, I guess, model year changeovers. Can you maybe talk about the timing here? Obviously, when you have a lot of -- maybe not you, but your competitors have 24 models in the pipeline, it kind of slows things down a little bit. What are you looking at it from a timing perspective and maybe from a pricing perspective?

I think the -- I mean, the model year changeover period, it can't be -- we can't legally, if you like, or based on regulations to introduce model year into commerce before the 1st of June. But often, it's somewhere between the 1st of June and maybe into the end of July, depending on what the kind of prevailing environment is. But given the penalty of additional discounts for prior model year product at the moment, we'd expect most of our customers. And certainly, we will be introducing new model year products on the earlier side of that, mainly in the first part of June. So we're now running in a period where it's just 6 weeks mainly to the model year changeover. So we would expect people to be cautious about building inventory in this period, and that's exactly what we're seeing. Sorry, what was the other part of your question, Scott, I missed it. I'm sorry.

Yes. And just on general thoughts on pricing.

Pricing. Yes, our pricing will be very modest this year, and we'd expect that across the industry.

The next question is from the line of Megan Alexander with Morgan Stanley.

Maybe just a quick follow-up on some of the questions that have been asked. In the slides in the prepared remarks, I think you talked about doing some more targeted discounts and promotions, I think mainly and mostly on higher floor plan support at this point. So 2-part question. I guess, is this just being absorbed somewhere else in the P&L at this point, given you didn't really change the guide around it? And then second point is given you can't really time the inflection of when retailers start to order the '25, I guess, why not be more aggressive or maybe you are with supporting dealers in terms of promotions at retail and pushing through these prior year models? Or is it -- to Scott's question earlier, more a question of the competition at this point?

Yes. So we definitely -- I would say discounting is really -- when we say increased discounting, we're talking about versus prior year primarily as opposed to versus plan. The discount rates are pretty much as planned. But in terms of targeting, yes, we certainly do support kind of prior model year moving prior model year product in collaboration with our retail partners. But the other parts that are targeting are really around model lines and segments that we target. Our premium product lines are not requiring a lot of discounting and promotional support at the moment. It's not 0, but it's not particularly high versus some of the value product lines and fiberglass and some of the less expensive, I guess, more value-orientated parts of aluminum product line that require more support, even kind of some of the pontoon product lines require more support. So it's really about which product lines and segments require support. The other thing that we're cognizant now obviously is some of our models will be significantly changed at model years, some less significantly changed at model year. So the ones that are being significantly changed, obviously, we would add more promotional support to move out the prior model year product. So those are more the kind of targeting things that we're talking about. I think broadly, discounting promotion is not different to plan just higher than prior year.

Understood. That's helpful. And maybe just one quick follow-up. FX and incremental headwind, nice to see that you think you'll be able to offset it with tax rate and good to see the higher share repo. But just given what's going on with the Fed and the uncertainty -- understanding it's early in the year. Was there any thought to lowering the full year guide? Or maybe you can give us some context around how you thought about that.

No, not really. I think, Megan we gave ourselves some space in the guide at the beginning of the year. I think the $7 to $8 is a pretty decent amount of space. If we thought that was under threat, obviously, we would have considered it, but we don't think it is at the moment. Yes, certainly, there are some ups and downs, and I'm very pleased that we were able to cover even in Q1 that the FX headwind. I think it's obviously, given the market today, particularly it's good to be in the market with more share repurchases. We're obviously biasing to the first half of the year on that. So no, no consideration of changing that at the moment.

Our next question is from the line of Craig Kennison with Baird.

Should just ask my first question. So maybe I'll just pivot. Dave, you mentioned the Atlantic speed limit proposal, which has gotten a lot more attention lately among the analyst community. But you also mentioned, I think, a possible technology-based solution that might supplant to regulatory-based solution. Just -- I'm wondering, do you have innovation in the pipeline, and could that be part of the solution? And do you think regulators might listen if you have that sort of pitch to offer?

Yes. We -- I think we've been very active in promoting existing and potential near future technological solutions. The proposed rule is really a huge overreach and completely ineffective way of approaching this. I think that it's basically a placebo, but it is what it is. So I think the -- first of all, the negligible evidence of a lot of boats, 35 feet and above contributing to whale deaths and any significant numbers. We could trace one in the last 20 years, so -- of a whale with an ID. So this is really a -- it's complete overreach. If you really wanted to try and address this, then we have to combine boats and infrastructure, for example, with AIS systems for tracking or sonar or vision systems. There are a lot of ways to do this in a much more effective way than it's currently being proposed. Concerning the rule, we don't exactly know what the rule is. We know what some of the kind of drafts were, but it's -- we don't see it until it gets published, if it gets published. And I would say the impacts are somewhat difficult to project. I think one of the analysts did analysis based on 60,000 boats affected with a life of 20 years, which gives you a replacement of 3,000 boats and then with our market share. But the -- there are a couple of factors to consider here. One is that the proposed rule that we saw has the limits effective in the off-season, basically from November through April, which is mainly off-season for boats in that part of the market. And the assumption would be that somebody would say a 37-foot boat wouldn't replace it with a 34-foot boat. So I think Craig, it's really difficult to project how this kind of plays out. But it's -- we're concerned about it really because of the precedent it might set as opposed to the -- necessarily the specifics of this particular implementation. It's just a huge overreach.

Our next question is from the line of Mike Swartz with Truist Securities.

First question, I may have missed it, but did you say with global, are there weeks on hand or pipelines were at the end of the quarter? And then just as it pertains to the full year guidance, what are you assuming are either weeks on hand or pipelines by the end of the calendar year?

We don't have the account here in the 37-ish, range. Yes, about 37.

Down a couple of weeks, end of the year.

So 37 by the end of the year?

Yes, that's right. It's 36 right now, and we expect about 37 by the end of the year. That is our -- that is what we are planning our production around, I would say, more -- maybe more correctly at the moment.

Got you. And then just a second question. We get a lot of feedback on this from people in the industry. But I guess what are you doing to address affordability? I mean, I would assume there's things you can do around pricing, things you can do around content. But maybe at a high level, what things are you addressing through affordability, maybe with your model year '25 product line?

Yes, certainly. I mean, I think the -- when you're thinking about making a boat affordable, there's lots we can influence in terms of base content, so -- but we might adjust base content. We might -- I think a couple of things. One is we offer versus pretty much everybody else, the broadest possible product line. We have boats, as we said, that sell for a $1,000 and boats sell for more than $1 million. So there are lots of ways to enter the market with us as it is. We can certainly control base content so that we make sure that we offer maybe a rung on the ladder that wasn't typically available. But there are broader considerations about resale value and other things that consumers are very aware of. You certainly -- there are certainly some boats that you just don't want to decontent. This is very similar to a car. Do you want to sell it again after 3 years and it doesn't have some key piece of content on it, then the resale is going to be lower. And I think people are smart enough to know that the consider resale when they're buying something. So yes, we have a broad product line. We'll certainly, in some cases, be adjusting some base content to maybe add rung on the ladder that wasn't there before. But really, the product line does a lot of the heavy lifting for us, I think.

Our next question is from the line of Matthew Boss with JPMorgan.

So Dave, just to follow up on wholesale. Could you just elaborate on the visibility today that you have in the second quarter relative to the back half wholesale orders? And just maybe how best to think about the drivers behind the OEM caution that you cited today relative to the sequential wholesale improvement that's expected throughout the year?

Yes. Well, I think the drivers, as I mentioned earlier, really are retailers not wanting to hold more current model year inventory than they really have to, to support sales before the changeover, which will, for most people, be in June. Because they have to apply typically additional discounting or promotions of some kind to move prior model year product. So as soon as somebody is in the showroom of a dealer in June and they're faced with a '25 model year and a '24 model year on the floor, the dealer is typically going to have to apply more promotional activity around the '24 model year. So I think that's what's driving it. I think also there's just general caution at the moment around how the consumer is going to behave. Is there difference in behavior versus recent experience. I think we -- at the moment, we have -- we don't have a huge amount of insight into dealer orders in Q3 for our smaller product, particularly. For our larger product, like the premium like the bigger boats, the bigger Harrises, the Whalers, the Sea Rays, the orders are much more visible to us, and it takes a long time to build one of those boats anyway. So if you want it in June or obviously in Q3, your already ordering it essentially. And we know that Q3 orders are already strong for those brands. So it really depends on the visibility we have is less for value product and more for premium product, I would say.

Great. And then maybe, Ryan, to follow up. Just given the caution on overall first half wholesale orders, could you speak to how you're managing costs in the expense base to offset the related absorption headwind.

Yes. Obviously, our first quarter kind of speaks for itself, right? We took $11 million of OpEx out versus the same quarter last year. And all of our business units played a part, wasn't just 1 unit or a corporate. So we have cost programs throughout the entire company, both to launch manageable costs. So things like spending on travel and things like that, but also making sure that we're keeping our gross margins as strong as possible, right? It's a 2-part story. You can only take out so much OpEx at a time. But as you keep your gross margins stronger, that obviously plays a big role over time. And we've been -- we've shown the resoluteness of those margins here over the last several quarters. So we will continue to be very mindful of costs as we progress. But obviously, as new models come out with the model year and other new products come out, where product margins continue to grow, that will help the gross margin line as well. So all of that is kind of ingrained in everything we do today.

Our next question is from the line of Fred Wightman with Wolfe Research.

I'm hoping we could just put some of the retail and wholesale discussions about the first half and the back half in the context with the 2Q guide that you put out there. So on the earnings specifically, it looks like that's a little bit below the Street. And you've talked about some of the difficulties predicting OEM build schedules. So if we look at that 2Q number, today, is that sort of where you thought it would be at the start of the year? Or are you assuming a little bit more back half weighting, just given the fact that it sounds like people are holding off until model year '25 start to hit? How should we think about the cadence, I guess, versus where it was 3 months ago?

Yes. If you see, it's maybe a touch low. But if you look at the first half of the year, and you think we basically hit Q1. I think the Street consensus for Q2 was like $203 and the middle of our guidance range is $195. So in the fall of the first half, were $0.08 different. So it's really not a big delta here. But yes, for some of the factors that I just mentioned, I think we wanted to put a -- we always want to put a range in there that is achievable -- in a range of potential scenarios. So that's what we were considering. Ryan?

Yes, most of that could be derived from FX. I mean that has obviously played a little bit bigger of a role. And just -- we did have a comment earlier about tax rate versus FX. The FX impact is more negative than the tax rate goodness is positive. So tax rate can play a little bit of a role, but in and of itself won't get all the way there to cover our FX if it continues to be as strong on the dollar as it has been the first 15 weeks.

Maybe one of the consideration here is obviously in the back half of '23, that was tough half, the fourth quarter, particularly when we were destocking heavily in the face of reduced orders from OEMs provides us with a better competition.

That's fair. And if we just shift to Freedom, is there -- we've covered the sort of new boat retail environment a handful of ways so far on this call. But if you think about Freedom, it doesn't sound like you're seeing any signs of churn or unusual cancellations. Is there anything that you can just sort of share as far as stickiness or maybe how that could potentially be an offset to some of these people who were delaying or deferring purchases near term?

Yes. I don't know about the very last part about the could be, I suppose, an offset. It's definitely possible. Churn is still in the kind of 10% range, which is where it's kind of been in recent history. I would say, obviously, Freedom continues to benefit from not having been subject to the cumulative inflation impact that boats certainly have from a purchase perspective and also not really subject to the higher rate -- interest rate environment because nobody as far as we know, a few people are kind of financing their entry fee. So it's -- we think it's overall just a bit more kind of immune to the broader macroeconomic stuff that's impacting durable goods purchases. Freedom continues to expand, and we were very pleased to see increases in kind of year-over-year same club sales. That's very satisfying. So yes, the model is working very well, and certainly helps our boat business pulling through additional units.

Next question is from the line of Jaime Katz with Morningstar.

I want to focus on Freedom Boat Club. I think the statement on the call was that same-store sales or whatever metric was used. So it's up mid-single digits. And I'm curious if there's been a shift that you've seen from what would traditionally be buyers to maybe members in the club and whether there's any way to discern that? And then after that, is FBC still sort of slated to run at that mid-single-digit rate growth over the rest of the year?

Yes, we're delighted with the performance of Freedom, not just in the domestic market, but also now in European market where there's a heavy presence and the Australian market, and you should expect to see us expanding to other region, other geographies as well, since the model seems to be very robust in those areas. I don't know if I can tell you we may have the data to track if recent members are kind of trading off buying a boat or going into Freedom. I don't have that data. But we could take a look at it to see if there's any particular trend in that regard. I go back to the original data that we got when we were contemplating the acquisition of Freedom, and that was that very few Freedom members were contemplating buying a new boat. But one of the things that we do benefit from now is that Freedom has a concierge service so that anybody who's in Freedom and wants to buy a new boat is directed to one of our brands. So that's extremely helpful. Yes, Freedom continues to grow, and we anticipate yet solid growth to the balance of the year. I can't remember the growth rate exactly that we're anticipating. Did we make publish it? Yes, we didn't publish a growth rate. But I think, yes, we expect solid growth through the balance of the year.

Okay. And then I know this was touched on earlier, but I'm assuming that the flattish market outlook is contingent on some internal look for interest rates. So do you care to share with us what your internal expectations for rate movements are over the remainder of the year?

Yes. I think just like everybody else is that changing the time. So -- I don't think we have any specific insights.

No. And our call for a flattish market did not anticipate multiple. And just -- I think it is separate from the overall interest rate environment. So I -- we would not tie those 2 together on a one-for-one basis.

Maybe one thing to consider as well is that because of -- I mean, some of the promotional activity is dealers buying down interest rates, so are offering promotional rates. So there are many people who are financing their purchases are not financing at the base rate. They may be financing it at $499 or $599 with a promotional financing rate.

Our next question is from the line of Xian Siew with BNP Paribas.

There's been some questions about, I guess, new boat sales. So I wanted to ask about engine retail, which was down, looks like 9% per the slide, and you gained some share, so maybe let's say, you were down, I don't know, 6% or 7%. It's like how does that track versus your expectations going into the year?

Yes. That's kind of in line with our initial expectations for the quarter. We are very confident in our ability to continue to outperform the market and take share, certainly in the 150-horsepower and greater categories. So we don't see that stopping. Retail, obviously, is going to be a function, as Dave said earlier, on OEM production schedules and also a little bit of the repower channel, which continues to be strong, where we also take share. So that -- we're kind of performing as anticipated right now. And again, subject a bit to the OEM production schedule of our core consumers continue to take more share even if the industry as a whole is slightly more sluggish.

Okay. Got it. And maybe also following up on that in propulsion. I think mix was a benefit last year as you were kind of restocking some of the higher horsepower engines. It sounds like maybe that continues a bit because you're kind of mentioning the higher horsepower again? Or is it -- or do you kind of see a more normalization of that mix effect?

Yes. No, there's 2 components to mix, right? There's the product component and the customer component. I would say the product component continues to be a positive as again, market share gains and high horsepower continue and that premium product continues to be quite strong. And then consumer mix changes from quarter-to-quarter depending on who is buying it at wholesale. And in Q1, it was pretty neutral.

Our next question is from the line of Joe Altobello with Raymond James.

So first question, maybe big picture. You mentioned flattish U.S. marine industry this year. Q1 is down 10%. And I know the months do start to get more important over the spring and summer. But what's going to get retail return positive? And does pricing need to adjust to start to see unit growth again?

Joe, I think this pricing need to adjust. I mean, I think at the moment, obviously, the transaction prices are quite different from where there might be an MSRP or kind of recent historical pricing because of the promotion and discounting environment, particularly on value product lines. So one of the things that we do have now that is an increasingly used capability is the ability to do A/B testing in pretty localized portions of the market to see whether incremental promotional discounting activity will drive additional sales. So some places, we see it will, some places, not necessarily so much. So I think that -- I don't think at the moment, transaction prices are broadly a big lever. But they are certainly -- the transaction prices are certainly improved by the discounting and promotion levels. In terms of what will drive the consumer some more in addition to what we can offer, I think, obviously, a good weather in the season will be really helpful. It always is. But then a little bit more clarity in the macro environment, obviously, would be helpful too.

Got it. Okay. And just a follow-up on that. You said you anticipate shipping model year '25 a little earlier than normal. Any sense for when we might see competitive product in the channel? And could you guys have a bit of an advantage for a few weeks?

I think most people will be implementing model changeover relatively early this year. So I don't know that we'll get an advantage or not. I do -- I would say, though, that we continue to gain market share on the boat side. We talk a lot about the engine side, but just based on SSI, we're up 50 basis points. so far this year. So I think our new product investment, it is flowing through to a lot of really nice contemporary designs with a lot of really strong and unique differentiated technology is really helping us overall. And that's what we will continue to do across our product lines is make sure we have the most contemporary looking and the best featured boats. So I think that is probably a biggest source of competitive advantage for us.

At this time, we've reached the end of our question-and-answer session. I'll hand the floor back to Dave for closing remarks.

All right. Thank you all very much for joining us and for the great questions. As you saw, despite the challenges, retail is currently proceeding more or less in line with our expectations and we delivered a very solid quarter. I think the resilience of our portfolio is very much on display. Gross margins held up really well. And our cost control discipline is on display as well. I think we did a really nice job in the quarter, and we'll continue to do that. Field inventory levels remain extremely well balanced. So we don't have excess inventory, and we think we're really set up well for the balance of the year. Our free cash flow continues to be strong. And obviously, we did a really timely debt issuance. So that allows us to increase share repurchases at a time when today, I'm pleased that we're going to be in the market with more share repurchases early in the year. We're going to bias that obviously to the first half of the year. So overall, I think a solid quarter and a very balanced view of the year ahead. Thank you.

Thank you. This will conclude today's conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time, and thank you for your participation. Have a wonderful day.