Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to the BCE Q4 2025 Results and 2026 Guidance Call. I would now like to turn the meeting over to Kris Somers. Please go ahead, Mr. Somers.

Thank you, Matthew. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining our call. My name is Kris Somers, Head of Investor Relations. And with me here today are Mirko Bibic, BCE's President and CEO; and Curtis Millen, our CFO. You can find all our Q4 disclosure documents, including our safe harbor notice concerning forward-looking statements on the Investor Relations page of the bce.ca website. Before we begin, I'd like to draw your attention to our safe harbor statement on Slide 2 of the presentation, reminding you that today, remarks made during the call will include forward-looking information, and therefore, are subject to risks and uncertainties. Results could differ materially. We disclaim any obligation to update forward-looking statements, except as required by law. Please refer to our publicly filed documents for more details on assumptions and risks. With that out of the way, I'll turn the call over to Mirko.

Thanks, Kris, and good morning, everyone. I'm looking forward to walking through our results and outlook with you in a short moment. First, I want to take a moment to frame where we are. In 2025, we had a pivotal year for BCE. It was a year of deliberate change, where we strengthened the balance sheet, we sharpened our capital allocation discipline and clearly defined our long-term strategy at Investor Day in October of 2025. And over the course of 2025, we aligned the organization around 4 strategic priorities that leverage our unique and differentiated assets across fiber, wireless, enterprise and media to deliver the very best for our customers, and we set clear measurable targets for the next phase of growth. So that groundwork is now in place. The strategy is clear. The priorities are set, the company is aligned, and we've begun to execute against that plan. You could see that execution translate into momentum throughout 2025, including the fourth quarter, as we focused on improving customer experience, strengthening fiber and wireless network leadership in Canada, establishing a fiber growth platform in the U.S., accelerating momentum in enterprise and digital media and positioning the business for sustainable free cash flow growth. And I'd like to start on Slide 3 of our deck with an overview of how we executed last year against those 4 strategic priorities. So putting the customer first, that remains foundational, and the results are tangible. Postpaid churn improved for the third consecutive quarter with a 17 basis point year-over-year improvement in Q4. Importantly, the magnitude of improvement accelerated throughout the year, demonstrating sustained momentum as our customer-first initiatives take hold. We made important progress in 2025 with the launch of differentiated wireless plan tiers that move beyond traditional data buckets. These plans give customers…

Thank you, Mirko, and good morning, everyone. Our strong fourth quarter and full year 2025 financial results demonstrate the stability of our business and our ability to deliver on the strategic and financial commitments we outlined over the past year, including at Investor Day. On a consolidated basis, we achieved all of our 2025 financial guidance targets, reflecting disciplined execution across the organization. 2025, service revenue increased 0.6% for the year, supported by contributions from Ziply Fiber and continued resilience in our core businesses. Adjusted EBITDA increased 0.7%, driving a 20 basis point improvement in adjusted EBITDA margin to 43.6%, the strongest annual margin result we've delivered in more than 30 years. Adjusted EPS declined 7.9% in '25, consistent with our guidance and primarily reflecting higher depreciation and amortization from ongoing network investment, along with increased interest expense. Capital expenditures declined by $197 million to $3.7 billion, resulting in a capital intensity of 15.1%, in line with guidance and consistent with our longer-term objective to reduce capital intensity. We delivered a 10% increase in free cash flow to $3.2 billion toward the upper end of our guidance range, driven by higher EBITDA, lower CapEx and improved working capital. Free cash flow after payment of lease liabilities increased 17.5%, an important metric in the 3-year financial outlook we shared at Investor Day, where we continue to target approximately 15% CAGR. We're entering 2026 with solid momentum in cash generation. At the segment level, there's clear momentum at Bell Business Markets, reflected in relatively stable revenue and EBITDA in '25, while Bell Media delivered positive revenue and EBITDA growth for the full year, consistent with the execution themes Mirko outlined earlier. Turning to Q4 on Slide 9. I'll begin with a summary of Bell CTS Canada subscriber metrics. Postpaid wireless net adds…

Thank you, Curtis. [Operator Instructions]. And with that, Matthew, we're ready to take our first question.

[Operator Instructions] The first question comes from Tim Casey from BMO Capital Markets.

Could -- you talk a little bit about your guidance ranges, 1% to 5% and 0% to 4%. Those -- obviously, there's a few swing factors in there. Maybe just what's influencing you? Is it competitive intensity? Is it economic issues? Just maybe walk us through your thinking on the guidance ranges, if you could, please.

Thanks, Tim. I'll start, and then, Curtis can layer on. I think what you're seeing in the guidance we're giving you on revenue and EBITDA certainly is a reflection that our growth segments continue to grow as we signaled they would, and we continue to need to manage the legacy declines as carefully as we possibly can, and we transparently unpack that for everyone in October last year. So on the growth side, the proof points are the premium Bell loadings, the churn, the product intensity, the fiber net. Of course, we want to continue to improve service revenues. And in there, you've got AI-powered solutions revenue, both in totality and then within the -- and organically, continue to guide towards positive Bell Media revenue and EBITDA. There's the U.S. opportunity, and of course, free cash flow growth, which is pretty healthy while funding strategic initiatives. So that's on the growth side. And then the swings potentially are wireless penetration gains and overall market growth in wireless. Of course, the state of pricing in wireless and wireline, both. I already talked about managing legacy, but you've got within that legacy advertising declines and legacy declines generally. The overall economic environment factors into our assessment on the range. And then the last 2 things I'll say is while we've got good momentum in AI-powered solutions and in cost transformation, are we able to further gain even better momentum in both of those, and that could swing to the positive depending on the traction we continue to get. Anything to add, Curtis?

Yes. I'd just add, it's a detail. We're not targeting to reach low end of the range. We're targeting higher than that, but it is appropriate to have a range. And I'd just note the spread of the range is consistent with the last couple of years. So again, we think this is the appropriate range and consistent with our past practice.

Just as a follow-up, any comment on what we're seeing in the wireless pricing environment and what usually is a very tepid loading environment and promotional environment? There seems to have been a little more activity than some of us would have expected in January. Just what are your reflections on what's going on in wireless so far in '26?

Yes. Thank you for the follow-up, Tim. I'll start with something that does need to be said, particularly with one of our key priorities being putting customers first. It's pretty clear that over the last, call it, number of years, certainly 3 years or so, we see consumers getting tremendous value from the wireless services we offer. You got lowering prices, improved network service enhancements, feature enhancements and basically the benefits of robust competition across the country. So that's important to say. Within that context, I think probably what I'll say, Tim, is that we're continuing at Bell to be disciplined. And that's a function of just sticking to our plan and being diligent in our execution. So for us, and this is not new, we're really focused on the bell loadings because the market is shifting to Tier 1 brand value proposition with 5G, with mobility, Internet and content. We're trying to improve the service revenue trajectory. We're really dialed in on base management. And if you go back to a year ago, we basically set out ARPU dilutive loadings in January of 2025, and yet, we still delivered strong full-year loadings. It just shows you that the discipline is working. And more recently, in the past month, January of this year, I think you saw some pretty aggressive promotions, the past 2 weekends, from some of our peers, and we decided to sit that out as well because what we're trying to do is get an appropriate share of wireless nets, profitable transactions, leveraging the premium tier. And we're focused on strong channel execution, both in retail and online and in the call centers.

Our next question is from Stephanie Price from CIBC World Markets.

In terms of my question, I was hoping you could walk through what's baked into the guide in terms of Ziply, how we should think about growth and margins in that business in '26? And maybe my follow-up is a bit on the U.S. competitive environment and if you're seeing any changes in the Ziply footprint here.

Right. So on Ziply, we're pleased. So 2025 ended exactly as we -- pretty much exactly as we telegraphed it would in -- at Investor Day for 2025. So that remains the case. And the performance does remain above our initial investment case when we announced the potential transaction back in November of 2024. So good on both of those fronts. In terms of the underlying fundamentals, Stephanie, demand for fiber, it's all about fiber and the underlying fundamentals remain strong for fiber, whether or not it's demand for fiber, customer preference penetration gains, where we do have fiber, and the long-term economics, all that remains very supportive and beats cable on pretty much all the metrics, speed, reliability, latency, product expansion, overall experience. And that dynamic hasn't changed either competitively on the ground in the states where Ziply is operating.

And then just in terms of -- you mentioned a significant ramp in H2 in terms of the rollout at Ziply. Just curious how you're thinking about CI and the pace of the fiber rollout in the U.S. business?

Go ahead on CI.

Yes. Thanks for the question, Stephanie. And look, I would say we do manage CapEx and capital intensity on a consolidated basis. So we are expecting capital intensity overall to drop, but fixed dollars remaining the same. You're not wrong, though. I would expect CapEx dollars spent in Canada probably go down year-over-year and with an increase in the U.S. But again, we're managing that on a consolidated basis and gives us the ability to reallocate capital towards higher-growth initiatives. So we're happy to have that flexibility, and frankly, that stronger opportunity in front of us.

Our next question is from Jerome Dubreuil from Desjardins Securities.

I'll just follow up a bit on Tim's questions there. But after seeing what has happened with the wireless landscape over the last few weekends, have you changed your expectations for 2026 or padded the downside a little bit better?

So that's -- Jerome, that's built into the ranges on guidance that we've talked about. If you focus on -- maybe if I take a narrower focus on the question and go straight to ARPU, for example, so when we came out of Black Friday in November of 2025, we thought it would be possible to show moderate ARPU growth by Q4 of 2026. And with the pricing we saw in December of 2025 and what we've seen some of our peers do in January, it might be more difficult to get there. But there's still 11 months left in the year. And I think -- broadly speaking, I think there are signs that we can go back to the level of pricing we saw more of in October, November, particularly while delivering the tremendous value for consumers, which I talked about earlier when I was discussing with Tim.

Okay. That's helpful. In terms of the next step for AI Fabric, I think the ROI opportunity there is pretty strong. Maybe if you can discuss the potential catalyst that you see down the road? Are there -- is there an inflection in demand? Are there announcements we should be expecting maybe from the different government levels?

Yes. So I'll try to take it. So on AI Fabric specifically, what we built in the 2026 plan and guidance is the monetization of a relatively small portion of the significant amount of overall capacity we currently have available to monetize over the coming years. And so that's based on our confidence to deliver those sites in year in 2026. So that's built into what you see today. We are in active discussions across multiple additional opportunities, and we've been sharing that consistently. And that's based on the pretty strong interest and sales funnel we have. There's a lot of demand for the capacity we do have. And so there are discussions that are ongoing.

Our next question is from Maher Yaghi from Scotiabank.

Maybe I'll start with your assumptions on 2026 wireless subscriber growth for the industry or maybe better if you can give us some indications about what you expect you can achieve. You talked about ARPU. And so when I think about the pricing picture, Mirko, you mentioned that given what you saw in Q1 so far and late in Q4, you might not show a return to positive ARPU growth. I don't think that's -- I think the general market is in line with that view. But do you believe that the first couple of big discounts we saw this quarter in the last week, 2 weekends have hurt you in any way in terms of achieving your goals in subscriber loading for Q1? I'll start with that question, and I'll have another question on convergence after.

Okay. So there's -- thank you, Maher. There's kind of a few elements in that. So let me start with market growth generally. Our view of wireless market growth, to keep it short, is broadly consistent with what you heard last week from one of our competitors. So we also continue to see market growing at a low single-digit rate, and that just reflects a more mature market and lower overall volume growth and increases in penetration. So that's on that part. I -- in terms of how we're going to operate, it's -- I mean, I don't want to repeat too much of what I said at the beginning in response to the first question, but what we saw in January of this year, particularly the last 2 weekends, it doesn't change the delivery, our execution against our goals because we are going to stick to our plan. We are going to be disciplined. It's all about having a strategy and then executing against that and not deviating because of 1 or 2 weekends. So our approach remains Bell loadings, accretive loadings sitting out ARPU dilutive loadings, product intensity. So we're going to continue to execute against that. We're doing reasonably well. What we want to get is our appropriate share of market loadings. And on ARPU growth, which was kind of the third element you outlined in your question, I guess I'll end here where I ended on the previous question to when I was discussing with Jerome. There are still 11 months left in the year. So there's lots of opportunity here to deliver on what we all thought we'd be able to deliver, particularly by the end of this year.

Okay. That's fair. So my second question or follow-up is on convergence. Wireless, wireline bundles is not something new, of course. But in a more competitive market, I look at your fiber footprint, the largest in Canada by far, and compare that with some of your U.S. peers, which are trying to catch up and have made convergence their #1 priority, I would say. How much upside do you believe BCE can achieve from leaning on your fiber footprint to increase your wireless market share? And could you share with us what percent of your wireline footprint base is also a wireless customer of BCE, just to have some kind of a reference compared to what we hear from your U.S. peers?

So I think -- I don't have it at my fingertips, Maher, but I think at Investor Day, we did outline our goals on product intensity in terms of percentages, 25% product intensity increase between now and 2028. So we are trying to -- that answers your question is do we think there's upside? 100%, we think there's upside, and we gave the upside target over the 3-year timeframe. And that's largely on the back of an expansive fiber footprint, coupled with the best premium content in the business in Crave and continued leadership in wireless. So -- I know I'm giving you more of a general strategic question -- point of view. So that's the strategy. The strategy is born from a belief in tremendous upside. The upside is going to come through disciplined execution. And in terms of the specific stats you're asking for, I don't think we'll give that here on the call.

Our next question is from Sebastiano Petti from JPMorgan.

I guess just following up on Stephanie's question related to perhaps the U.S. environment. What you've seen here in the U.S., I guess, is scaled fiber operators seem a bit more focused on driving penetration this year and largely have messaged that ARPU growth might be a little bit muted. I mean -- and then the cable operators, Comcast, Charter, who you compete with in the vast majority of your Ziply footprint, have largely messaged as well that ARPUs or price increases will not necessarily be passed through here, as they try to focus on churn reduction, gross addition improvement. While still early, and I think you just kind of hit on it, Mirko, in your answer to Maher's question there that I presume a lot of the growth is volume-based. But boots on the ground, blocking and tackling, has anything changed in the strategy or Harold and the team's strategy in the U.S. kind of given the competitive environment? That's my first question. And then, I'll just toss out my second one here as well. On Slide 5, you do talk about continued noncore asset sales as you optimize the balance sheet. Any update on current work streams or what we might be able to perhaps expect in 2026?

So on the Ziply part of the question, Sebastiano, so nothing has changed in terms of the strategy and the execution in the Ziply markets where we have fiber. We're continuing to see the penetration ramp exactly as we had expected and as Ziply had been performing prior to our acquisition. So all that remains quite solid. On pricing, it's interesting, Ziply has typically not been the highest priced broadband provider in the markets it operates. So there's a price gap between Ziply and cable where Ziply's pricing has tended to be below that of cable. And what you're seeing just maybe more broad kind of take on the Ziply questions is what you're seeing in what we're signaling is the -- there's a deliberate reset here on our part quite strategically. Prior to closing, Ziply's build plan was largely focused on upgrading its existing copper footprint within its existing ILEC territory. And as we said consistently, as we were leading up to closing of the transaction and since is that our long-term plan together with the Ziply management team is to go broader now. And now we have PSP in the Network FiberCo project. And the plan there is to build both within and beyond the ILEC footprint. And we're going to do that in a sequential and capital disciplined way. So we plan to do the build now not only within the 4 core states, not only within the ILEC footprint in those 4 core states, but outside both the ILEC footprint and the 4 core states. So if you kind of take that as the strategy, what happened is once we closed the acquisition, we took a bit of a step back and to reassess what had been the build plan so that we could tackle the wider geographic slate. And as we redesign the plan, what you're going to see is a little bit of a near-term slowdown in terms of the actual passings, but ramp, as we get to the back half of this year and into 2027 and beyond so that not only can we hit our 3 million locations passed target, but do it in the markets that we think are the most attractive. And then the second question was...

Yes, Sebastiano, to get to your second question around asset sales. So I'd say consistent with our previous messaging throughout the year at Investor Day, we are focused on maintaining our discipline around capital allocation. One of our priorities is strengthening the balance sheet. You saw net debt slightly, but decreased even with the acquisition of Ziply. So we are continued -- we will continue to be focused. We are on track to reach our 3.5x net leverage target by 2027. And as we talked about previously, asset sales will play a role. We do have files underway. And as we reach agreements, we'll provide more transparency to the market.

Our next question is from Vince Valentini from TD Securities.

First, maybe just a clarification. Are we going to get Enterprise segment revenue starting to get disclosed discretely in the first quarter? I thought there was some indication at Investor Day, you'd improve enhanced disclosure. And second, more of a question, employee purchase plans within the wireless segment. I know you've been saying for the last couple of quarters, the vast majority of your postpaid net adds are on the Bell brand, but the Bell brand includes these EPP plans, which sometimes are $35 or $40 for big buckets of data, including roaming in other countries as well. Can you give us any sense, is that a satisfactory level of your loading, Mirko? Do you think that's getting a bit out of control? And do you have good eyeballs and gates on making sure your in-store reps authenticate people to make sure they qualify for these EPP versus just giving it to anybody?

Thanks for the question, Vince. I'll do the second, and Curtis, you can answer the first. Look, on EPPs, they are -- there's an EPP segment in the marketplace. We have traditionally, frankly, been gapped in EPP sales, both in terms of in the past functionality and as well as kind of a desire. By design, we've been gapped. We've over time fixed some of the product feature and execution gaps on EPPs, but our view hasn't changed on the strategy, which is we'll play where we need to, but we believe we are fundamentally disciplined executing against all core segments. Again, the focus is disciplined execution on the most accretive loadings while remaining competitive as appropriate in each segment. And that's what we're going to continue to do, Vince. We -- and again, you just -- EPP is one part of it, but you see some of the above-the-line aggressive pricing that some of our peers have put in market the last 2 weekends, and we set out. We did the same thing last year in January 2025. And ultimately, when you look at the full year performance in 2025, we took our appropriate share of net adds, and that's because we focused on executing against -- at the right times throughout the year. And that's the thing -- that's what we're going to continue to do.

And Vince, just on your first question, the answer is yes. So starting Q1, we'll provide more detail in and around the enterprise segment.

Our next question is from Batya Levi from UBS.

Great. A couple of follow-ups. First on the U.S. Is it possible to size the build plan for this year? And what are some other opportunities you're seeing to accelerate the fiber plan in the U.S., maybe some tuck-ins? And convergence also a theme. And are you -- do you see adding an MVNO important to inflect your subscriber growth in the U.S.? And a quick follow-up on Canada, can you talk about the TPIA activity in broadband?

Okay. Thank you, Batya. So on M&A opportunities, I'm going to give you a general answer on M&A opportunities, and this applies to the U.S. or Canada. We'll always take a look at opportunities to drive shareholder value. Importantly, though, any one of those would have to fit within our capital markets goals and deleveraging targets. So I'll leave it at that on M&A in the U.S. or otherwise. In terms of convergence, we -- at this moment in time, a converged offering in the U.S. is not required by Ziply in order to drive the penetration gains where we have fiber, and -- but we recognize that there may be a point in time that we'll want to do that, and we have a number of options available to us that we are looking at. So stay tuned for more on that over time. In TPIA, yes, of course, TPIA, not -- in terms of our -- what we want to do -- fundamentally, here's what we want to do. We want to -- again, in our approach to put customers first, we really do want to provide in the West to Western consumers an additional fiber option, particularly for those customers who want to buy more than one product from us. That remains our goal. Not much has happened with respect to execution against that goal, and that's because we're having difficulty getting an appropriate level of service from the fiber operator out West. And -- I mean, not to get into too much gory detail on this. I mean, some of the service windows or install windows are frankly weeks long, significantly longer than what we provide to resellers on our fiber network in the East, and that's untenable, particularly when we think that consumers out West are deserving or as deserving as competition as consumers everywhere else. ARPUs are higher for Internet in the West than they are in the East. So you could easily argue that consumers in the West are perhaps even more deserving of more competition. So what we're looking for is just an appropriate level of service from the underlying network owner out West. And once we -- once that's delivered to us, we'll be able to execute against what we said at Investor Day.

And are you seeing higher reseller activity in your region?

That's traditionally been the case. There's always been more resell for years and years and years in the East than in the West, and that's because the regulatory rules were actually always, for some reason, asymmetrical until recently, where there was no fiber mandate in the West, but there was a fiber resell mandate in the East. It's a bit inexplicable, but it's what it is. Those rules have changed now so that there's a fiber resell mandate across the country, but we just need appropriate service delivery so that we can deliver an experience to customers out West that they would expect of us and that we want to deliver because, again, all this -- put all of this aside, what matters the most is the experience that we deliver to customers. That's what concerns me the absolute most.

Our next question is from Matthew Griffiths from Bank of America.

I just wanted to ask on guidance. Coming out of the Investor Day, I think the message, and correct me if I'm wrong, was for within that 3-year guidance window for EBITDA growth to be sequentially higher in each subsequent year. Is that still the case as we get -- as we see 2026 guidance in the context of the 3-year guide?

Matthew, it's Curtis. Yes, nothing's changed our view there. We expect as our growth businesses ramp up, as Ziply Fiber continues to expand their footprint and drive penetration, as our AI-powered solutions businesses ramp up, we continue to expect EBITDA to progressively improve over that 3-year horizon.

Okay. And so within the guidance range for 2024 -- sorry, of 0% to 4% for 2026, it would seem at the high end of that range, given the ranges that you have longer term, it implies a downward trajectory on subsequent year growth. Can you just help kind of bridge those 2 together? And maybe there's something lumpy that could fall into 2026 that might fall into 2027? I don't know what it could be, but just kind of reconcile those things, would be helpful.

Yes. It's a fair question, Matthew. And look, the trend is upward, but it's not a linear path. As Mirko talked about earlier, there are timing fluctuations in terms of -- especially in our enterprise side of the world, there's a timing impact in terms of advertising continued rebound, launches of our services. So yes, on a 3-year horizon, it's a continuous upward trend. But within any reporting period, there's still going to be a range of outcomes. But the first point still holds true.

Okay. That's helpful. And then, you made some comments on wireless ARPU, which are helpful. I just was curious if you would make -- like what you would say your assumptions are around kind of international roaming as a contributor to either continued declines or stability? Because in the past, you've made some comments on where your monthly recurring revenues have been trending, which has been positive. So anything to add there would be helpful.

Yes. So roaming trends actually improved sequentially in Q4. It was still a decline, but it was a low single-digit decline. So we saw a healthy recovery in consumer roaming revenue in Q4, which is, I'd say, encouraging for future ARPU performance if that continues to hold.

There are no further questions registered at this time. I would now like to turn the meeting over to Mr. Somers.

Thank you, Matthew. Thank you again, everyone, for your participation on the call this morning. Richard and I will be available throughout the day for follow-up questions or clarifications. Thanks again, and have a great day.

Thanks, everyone. Have a good day.

Thank you. The conference has now ended. Please disconnect your lines at this time, and we thank you for your participation.