Thank you for standing by, and welcome to the Brookfield Renewable's Second Quarter 2022 Results Conference Call. As a reminder, today's program may be recorded. And now I'd like to introduce your host for today's program, Connor Teskey, CEO. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, operator. Good morning everyone, and thank you for joining us for our second quarter 2022 conference call. Before we begin, we would like to remind you that a copy of our news release, investor supplement and letter to unitholders can be found on our website. We also want to remind you that we may make forward-looking statements on this call. These statements are subject to known and unknown risks and our future results may differ materially. For more information, you are encouraged to review our regulatory filings available on SEDAR, EDGAR and our website. To kick off today's call, we will provide an update on the business and some of our recent growth initiatives. After my remarks, Ruth Kent, our Chief Operating Officer will give an update on our development activities, and then Wyatt will provide an overview of our operating results and balance sheet and liquidity. Following our remarks, we look forward to taking your questions. The business performed well this quarter, generating funds from operations of $294 million or $0.46 per unit, a 10% increase over the same period last year. We continue to advance our key operating priorities, as well as execute on transactions from our strong pipeline of growth opportunities. The trends driving the energy transition continue to accelerate, driven by the focus on net zero ambitions, low cost energy and energy security. Given the nature of power as an essential service, our business remains well positioned to operate and grow irrespective of the economic situation. We feel the current environment will continue to favor investors like ourselves who are well capitalized and globally diversified with significant development capabilities to build out renewables in scale. As always, we remain focused on growing our leading renewable power platform, expanding the spectrum of decarbonization solutions we…

Thank you, Connor, and good morning everyone. I'm excited to be speaking with you today about some of our recent operational initiatives. We believe it's our global operating and development expertise, including our commercial capabilities, that differentiates us as a partner of choice in decarbonization. Our 3,200 hundred operating professionals around the world mean, we can invest and execute across the entire spectrum of renewable power and transition assets. We are end-to-end. For example, we can invest during the asset development stage and leverage our capabilities to secure grid connection, permitting, procure equipment, construct the project, contract the power with corporate off-takers and ultimately, operate the assets. This end-to-end capability is not only a meaningful organic growth lever for our existing assets, but it also enables us to source a wide spectrum of opportunities where we can bring these capabilities to bear and de-risk investments and earn strong returns. We have a very substantial global development pipeline, which now stands at over 75 gigawatts, along with an 8 million metric tons per annum of CO2, carbon capture development pipeline. Of that, we have 17 gigawatts of advanced stage and ready to build construction projects, which we are advancing and delivering on. We continue to be well positioned from a supply chain perspective given our globally diversified pipeline and strong global relationships. Our cash flows have now started to meaningfully benefit from the considerable dollars in the ground that we have invested into our development projects in the past number of years. These investments will translate into higher earnings that will only accelerate for the rest of 2022 into 2023 and beyond. Our development investment has increased in recent years and that will continue, meaning we have strong visibility into the future growth of our cash flows as more of our…

Thank you, Ruth. As Connor mentioned, we had strong results in the quarter as our operations benefited from strong asset availability, higher power prices and continued growth, both through development and acquisitions. In the current power price environment, we are executing on several initiatives to capture value across our business. For example, at our hydro assets in the United States and Colombia, where we have a majority of our uncontracted generation over the next five years, we have been executing contracts at very attractive prices. At our pumped storage assets in the UK, we have locked in value through 2024, where we typically only do this months ahead. Our balance sheet and liquidity remain strong. We have approximately $4 billion of available liquidity, allowing us to opportunistically fund our growth pipeline and no material near-term maturities. Additionally, with the recent $15 billion closing of Brookfield Global Transition Fund, we have access to scale capital to invest alongside us, which is a meaningful advantage, given increasingly volatile capital markets. During the first half of 2022, we accelerated many of our financing activities, extending the term of our debt, and locking in attractive interest rates before recent rate increases. During the quarter, we executed over $2 billion of non-recourse financings across the business. Notably, on the back of a strong outlook for our Colombian business and in anticipation of potential market volatility ahead of the recent presidential elections, we raised $630 million in up-financings at an average term of over eight years. As a result, our balance sheet is in excellent shape, with an average debt duration across our portfolio of 13 years and very limited floating rate debt, almost all of which is in Brazil and Colombia, where we have the benefit of full escalate - inflation escalation in our contracts. Lastly, we also continued to advance our capital recycling initiatives which when closed will generate $560 million of proceeds or $90 million net to Brookfield Renewable. On behalf of the Board and management, we thank all our unitholders and shareholders for the ongoing support. That concludes our formal remarks for today's call. Thank you for joining us this morning. And with that, I'll pass it back to our operator for questions.

Our first question comes from the line of Sean Stewart from TD Securities. Your question please.

Thanks. Good morning, everyone. You touched on the developments you've made with corporate off-takers, new contracts, and you touched on the duration for the BASF contract. I'm just wondering if you can give us a little bit broader context on the market for corporate PPAs, what you're seeing in terms of price and duration? And if there is a sweet spot that you think about in terms of balancing corporate PPAs with traditional contracts and at the margin merchant exposure at this point?

Sure. Thanks, Sean. Perhaps I'll start and then I'll hand to Ruth for her to add additional color. Maybe breaking that down into different buckets. No doubt, the two most important dynamics we're seeing in the market as it pertains to corporate contracts right now is, one, demand for contracting of green power continues to accelerate. Year-after-year the total quantum of demand that we're seeing from large global corporates is accelerating on an exponential basis and short-term market conditions really have done nothing to dissuade that trajectory. But perhaps what's even more important is, there is no doubt been some CapEx inflation in our sector, as most sectors around the world, and what is really interesting and Ruth touched upon this in her remarks is, we are seeing the ability to pass along those cost increases into the corporate PPAs in the form of higher prices, and we're not really seeing other adjustments as a result. It's not shorter tenure, it's not a lack of inflation linkage. It's simply we are able to pass that price increase through to customers because renewables still is cheaper than the alternative of thermals, which has gone up in price even more and decarbonization and energy security trends continue to accelerate. Perhaps the last comment I'll make before handing to Ruth is, across our business, for many years, the vast majority of our growth has been tied to corporate contracting. Feed in tariffs do exist and will continue to exist for a while. They have a long tail. But the vast majority of our new growth is in corporate contracting and we expect that trend to continue and obviously plays to our strength, given our power marketing capabilities. Ruth I'll hand to you.

Thanks. I would reiterate some of what Connor had said. We've been doing this a long time, we have never seen such a wall of demand. It's never been stronger for clean renewable power. It's really two things, decarbonization as an imperative but moreover, economics. Look, this is going to be the cheapest strip of power that you will buy over the longer periods and the one that you can fix in whereas others are a lot more volatile as Connor has mentioned. And that's even before we hit this and particularly high cycle of fundamental power prices. And the other thing I would say is, look, we've been doing this for a long time and we are somewhat agnostic as to the nature of the contract. Whether it's a new build power PPA or more traditional contracts, we look to the fundamentals and that is what's your credit risk? Can we get good tenor and duration on the contract and overall, it's a risk management proposition for us and we have a lot of repeat customers that have journeyed from commodity type contracts with us to renewable new build, which has been super. And overall, I would say, you mentioned merchant's power. We generally don't look to hold the merchant power in our book. We would much rather de-risk all of our positions, lock in our economics and move on to the next new builds that we have. So, that tends to be how we look at things, if that's helpful.

And Sean, at one point, which is just your question around term. We're seeing no shortage of term. Corporates are looking for 15 or 20 year contracts or potentially even longer. Really what this is, is a great insurance policy for them against volatile or higher power prices in the future.

That's great context. Thanks for that. Second question, with respect to energy transition investments outside renewable generation. There is note of focus on technologies that are economic without subsidization. Can you give us a sense how do you handicap those opportunities outside of traditional renewable generation opportunities? How you think about the other energy transition options you have with respect to not needing as much subsidization?

Certainly. Perhaps what we can do is, look at some of the things that we've done and then look forward into some of the opportunities we're seeing. If you see the expansion of the types of opportunities we've looked at from more traditional utility-scale wind, solar and hydro, increasingly, our first step out was things like battery storage and DG. From there, we're seeing opportunities in carbon capture, where there is very well defined revenue models that can support the business. And the other very large energy transition asset class that is very front and center for us today is hydrogen. We remain focused on it, but we do view it as a slightly longer-term growth opportunity as the cost curve for that business comes down and ceases to rely on subsidies. The only other point we would add as it pertains to energy transition is, we increasingly see - are seeing opportunities in very high quality service providers to the power sector, that really provide critical functions to clean energy around the world and as we look at that space, will only pursue it if we get the right value entry point at the right risk return objectives. But we are seeing more and more opportunities in that space that could represent additional growth levers for our business.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Mark Jarvi from CIBC Capital Markets. Your question please.

Thanks. Good morning, everyone. I'm wondering if you could shed some more light on the investment in a Power Utilities company. Just, I know you took a direct stake in them. Just maybe walk me through what point do you want to be equity investors and entity versus providers of capital?

Mark, great question, and we'll come at this from two perspectives. One, just a highlight of the investment in general and then two, our approach to where we want to invest in the capital structure. What this opportunity is, is the opportunity to invest in what we would describe as a multi-jurisdictional, multi-asset utility focused across a number of jurisdictions that we're very comfortable operating in, in Central and Latin America. The reason why we like this business is, its 100% operated in U.S. dollars and operates 100% under long-term contracts. But what this business needs is capital to one, grow and two, decarbonize, and they reached out to us and we created a structure that we can help support them, both, financially as a capital provider, but also as our operating partner in achieving those goals and really the near-term opportunity is facilitating the build out of a 1.3 gigawatt renewables development pipeline that they have across their portfolio. As Mark alluded to, we invested both through a preferred equity structure, as well as taking a minority position in the common equity. When it comes to the exact structure of how we want to invest alongside our partners, it always comes down to two things. Are we getting the right risk adjusted returns, and two, do we have the appropriate level of influence and control? And the structure we pursued in this transaction works very well. The preferred equity investment provides very nice downside protection to our returns. Well, the minority equity position ensures that we have the appropriate level of influence and can really bring our operating capabilities to bear, to drive the decarbonization plan at the company.

Thanks, Connor. And then you mentioned that they came to you. I'm wondering also just with the Global Transition Fund out there now, tons of stuff on CCS, different deals here you're talking about, what, sorry I missed what is sort of the interest coming back into you, as I suppose you guys are chasing deals like, just has it changed at all in the last year or so?

I would say, it's been very significant, coming back to us. No doubt we continue to have a large team around the world that is pursuing and manufacturing transactions the way it always has in the past, but no doubt the launch and the recent conclusion of the fund raise of BGTF has been very helpful in highlighting how we can be that very helpful provider of capital, as well as operating partner for businesses, one, looking to scale decarbonization solutions, but two, who need a partner and a capital provider to decarbonize their own operations and no doubt, some of that inbound interest is showing up in the level of growth we're seeing in our business today.

Okay. And then just coming back to the corporate PPA. Is there any segment of the market you're missing out? Small industrial off-takers, smaller commercial entities or is that just really not the focus for you? And then if power prices do fall back down since there is volatility, do you feel like the pace of the corporate PPA market, I guess, contracting that we've seen and you talked about being an exponential growth, does that slow?

Certainly. So, in response to your first question and this is simply decision we have made to play to our strengths, and our strengths are we can be a scale provider of green power, we can also be a provider of green power across all major technologies, whether it's distributed generation, solar, wind. But most importantly, we can be a provider of green power to global corporates anywhere in the world that they operate, and that is something that is very, very unique to Brookfield Renewable, the ability to follow corporates, leading global corporates across all industries around the world to support the decarbonization of their operations. And our decision to do this is simply because it is where we are differentiated and we can do the largest in most attractive opportunities. No doubt, we are also doing a number of smaller deals on an ongoing basis, but our ability to differentiate on those large global partnerships is that competitive advantage that we certainly want to continue to pursue. To your second question around if power prices come down, do we think demand for corporate PPAs will be reduced? Absolutely not, and apologies for being redundant here, but the macro drivers of our business are far bigger than short-term power prices or short-term market volatility. The trends around decarbonization that are often set by corporates themselves that are actually outpacing government regulation, the focus on energy security and lastly, the point around economics, all of those just continue to be solidified and therefore, if prices are high or prices are low, we don't see demand decelerating at all.

Thank you. One moment for our next question. Our next question comes from the line of Rupert Merer from National Bank Financial. Your question please.

Good morning. Luca here filling for Rupert. So I'd like to know if you could give us more color on your hedge book in the Northeast U.S. for your hydro segment.

Certainly. Thanks, Rupert. So, thank you for the question. It's a very important dynamic to highlight. There is really only two places across our portfolio where we hold any scale amount of merchant exposure and that is our large hydro portfolio in Colombia, and secondly, our large hydro portfolio in the United States. And there's two important dynamics here. One is, we are absolutely not averse to contracting these portfolios. We simply haven't wanted to do it when we think power prices were low and below, call it run rate fundamentals and that certainly had been the case for a number of years prior to what we've seen in, call it the last six or 12 months. The second dynamic, we would highlight is when we are not long-term contracting these assets, we do tend to enter into short-term rolling hedges just to facilitate settlement of our power sales. So therefore, we refer to it as merchants, but they're still under six, nine or 12 month rolling contracts. Why that's an important dynamic is, when power prices began to go up in the latter part of 2021, as you move into 2022, we were already contracted under the short-term contracts well into Q1, a bit more into Q2 and on a decreasing basis into Q3 and Q4. And therefore, the benefits of the higher power prices, we are only now beginning to see flow through our results. To put all that together and come back to your question, given where power prices are today, we are moving quite consciously to lock in these high-power prices as far as we can into the future. Obviously, only where there is liquidity in the market and two, only to levels that are appropriate for our P50 generation. But at this point, we are locking in our hydros, two to three years in the future, in this market.

And maybe - it's Wyatt here. Maybe the only thing I would just to add context to the numbers is in the prior quarter, we put out a number of $120 million dollars from the benefit over the next five years, the benefit of doing that and it's really 5,500 terawatt hours that we have coming off contract. It's available for the benefit of pricing and locking those in on a forward basis at the rate at the time would have led to $120 million of benefit per annum, and what we say is that number is only been de-risked in the sense that we have been executing and since that point, power markets have actually seen some beneficial push upwards as well, and so there's probably a little bit of tailwinds to that as well.

Awesome. Thank you very much. And now, changing topics a little bit. Moving to development pipeline. Are you seeing much margin pressure for the projects in the pipeline, and if yes, is there a way for you to offset? Do you have the ability to renegotiate any contract prices for some market?

Certainly. So, Rupert. I'll take this and then I'll hand to Ruth because some of the dynamics we're seeing with our interactions with customers are really constructive. What I would say is, it's really this point that we have been able to increase the market price of the PPAs that we are executing to take into account the inflation that we're seeing in CapEx costs, whether it'd be wind turbines or solar panels. This has led to PPA prices going higher, but I would say the step change up in PPA prices has almost fully offset the increase in CapEx and essentially, another way of saying that is, our development returns were not seeing significant compression. Yes, the CapEx is higher but the PPAs are going higher to offset that. Perhaps I'll hand to Ruth to highlight some of the really constructive conversations we're having with customers around new features in PPAs.

Yes. It's a great question by the way. So, we are having very constructive conversations, particularly with a lot of our repeat customers that we work with across the globe and coming up with different mechanisms to support delivery of their decarbonization targets and in a timely fashion. So, things like indices that we are used to seeing, for example, in wind supply contracts et cetera, moving those into our PPAs and or allowing for reopeners at different points of the CapEx cycle. So again, I'd reiterate a number of things we said earlier, our customers see enormous value in the long-term PPAs in the security and pricing that they're getting from us. So any escalation in CapEx is absorbable at an economic level for them and still presents a lot of value. So, they really want to work with us on that, rather than a scenario where they have seen a number of smaller developers just hand back contract. Nobody wins in that scenario. So we're working very constructively, in some cases we're delaying slightly, and in others we're putting some mechanisms into contracts and so overall, we're in a good place with our economics. The other point I would make is, this situation is tending to be concentrated and exacerbated perhaps in the U.S. We have a global pipeline. So we can accelerate in some jurisdictions and pull back in others and if the economics are coming towards us. So, lots of options in the diversity of our book, to be honest.

Thank you. One moment for our next question. And our next question comes from the line of Ben Pham from BMO. Your question please.

Hi. Thanks. Good morning. I wanted to ask on your development pipeline over the last, call it, 12 months or18 months. How much of that increase is mostly due to acquisitions of like just simply getting land and sites?

Thanks, Ben. Great question. There is - I want to come back at your question in kind of breaking things into three buckets. Unequivocally, you are correct. We have bought a number of businesses that come with large development pipelines, and now is the largest chunk of the expansion in our pipeline capacity over the last 12 months. We don't have a specific number for you here today, but no doubt, I would expect that's probably about two-third to 70% of the expansion in that number. But there's two other things that have also driven the remaining, call it, one-third or 30%. One is, our operating teams around the world, in every jurisdiction that we operate in now, we have a local Brookfield Renewable boots-on-the-ground development team that is doing their own greenfield development, securing their land, getting permits, securing grid connection. That is driving that number a little bit higher. And then the last point, which perhaps is the most relevant is, a number of the businesses we have bought over the last, call it, six or 12 or even 24 months, we bought development platforms that, one, come with an existing development pipeline, but also come with teams that continuously grow those pipelines. We've seen X-ELIO, we've seen Urban Grid, we've seen Cenovus, we've seen our DG business. When we bought those businesses they came with the development pipeline, but under our ownership, they've also organically grown those pipelines higher. So I don't know if you put that third bucket in M&A or organic, it's a bit of a mix of both, but that's a very significant amount of the increase as well.

Okay. great. And I'm just thinking to that, when - do you think that for the development projects you're acquiring, you're paying very little value for in the initial price but you're basically probably accelerating by years the ability to crystallize value?

Certainly. There is no doubt that the development pipelines we've acquired over the last 12 to 24 months are more valuable today than at the time that we bought them as many of those development assets are not only worth more, but there is the opportunity to pull those assets forward and pull them out of the ground and, therefore, on an NPV value basis, simply bring those cash flows forward and increase their value that way. The other thing I would highlight is, when we buy developers, it is probably flippant to say there is a free option on the development pipeline, not if probably unfair, but when we do our due diligence and underwriting, what we do is we look at what is operating, what is very advanced, and we look at all the different stages of assets in the development pipeline and typically go site-by-site to determine the probability of those assets coming through and coming out of the ground in the near-term and what I would say is, you do attribute some value to the optionality of some of the early-stage projects, but I would say that the value we attribute to those is very, very low and we've probably seen some significant gains there over the last 12 to 18 months.

Yes. I guess got to pay 50%, that's what equity. I'm also wondering lastly, there is comment earlier around, I don't know that's redeploying capital, maybe you can be more flexible of where you want to invest geographically? Can you talk about areas where you have maybe pulled back on focus and other side areas where you spend a bit more time on?

Certainly. It's a good question. I would say if we think about our global portfolio right now, most of our regions are really firing on all cylinders and that's because the global trends are, sorry, the trends driving our business are global in nature. No doubt, the vast majority of our activity in the last 12 months has been in the United States. You know there has been a concentration there in the last six months. But I would say, our general rule of thumb, call it 75% of our business being in developed countries, primarily in North America and Europe that largely holds and that's because we don't necessarily do more deals in those geographies. But that certainly tends to be where we do the largest transactions. Some of this is highlighted in our shareholder letter, but in just the last quarter, we continue to see growth in our Brazil business, our Indian business, our Asia-Pacific business. So there is nowhere that we're really seeing things decelerate in the current environment.

Thank you. One moment for our next question. Our next question comes from the line of David Quezada from Raymond James. Your question please.

Thanks. Good morning, everyone. My first question here, just on the JV in the investment with California Resources Corporation. I'm just curious what kind of role you will take there aside from an investing role? Will you help finding off-take counterparties or anything like that? And just any thoughts around whether or not you could see synergies between that carbon capture investment and other ones you're making maybe down the road?

Certainly. So, maybe just to - thank you for the question, David. Maybe to highlight why we're so attracted to the JV, we obviously made our first investment in carbon capture earlier this year, an investment in a company called Entropy in Alberta, Canada. Prior to making that investment we did a global review in our core geographies of which markets we thought were the most attractive for CCS and the markets we came up with were Alberta, California and some markets in Europe. So, the first thing we really like about the partnership with CRC is we think it targets one of the most attractive markets globally for CCS. And then secondly, once we're targeting the most attractive market, we feel we are partnered with the most well positioned counterparty. CRC is one of the largest non-government land owners in the state. Therefore, they have access to both land rights and mineral rights, that gives them access to significant amounts of potential port space and they also have some of the most advance permits for CCS in the United States. So what do we bring in to the partnership? You absolutely nail that it's not just capital. Very similar to how we leverage our relationships with corporates around green power, some of the largest potential customers of the CRC JV are some of our largest existing power customers. So, we see significant overlap in synergies there. And then secondly, not dissimilar to what we see across our hydro business, or our solar business, as we add more platforms and more businesses in the CCS space, there is simply the ability to share best practices, share knowledge, share wins to enhance all of our investments and we think both Entropy and CRC will benefit from that, the fact that we own both those platforms and potentially could own other CCS platforms in the future.

That's great color. Thank you for that. And then maybe just one more for me. There is some commentary in the release about trying to move as fast as possible to build new projects in Germany. Just curious, if there are any goalposts you can provide around the size of that opportunity and yes, just any other opportunities that maybe you could see more broadly in Europe related to that high power price environment?

Certainly. And there's two things that are helping that ability to accelerate projects. One, there is obviously very, very strong demand. What is happening due to the energy environment in Europe is at essentially every major government, yes, they are taking some short-term measures to try and reduce energy prices, but the long-term solution is the accelerated build out of renewables. So in Germany, what I would say is, our total investment in our German solar business that we bought right around the turn of this year, we probably accelerated our capital deployment in totality, about 40%. So, a fairly material step change and that's probably a good proxy of some of the opportunities we're seeing. But the other point, that's really helpful is, this is not just driven purely by economics. One shift we are seeing in Europe and it absolutely has room to run is, governments are working to reduce some of the obstacles around permitting and building renewables and working to accelerate the process of bringing projects out of the ground, and we've seen across a number of markets in Europe and that's no doubt, benefiting our ability to pull some of those projects forward.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of William Grippin from UBS. Your question please.

Great. Thank you very much. First question here. You've talked in the past and a little in the press release about locking in your component prices when you're signing contracts with customers. Just curious if you could speak to any component availability and how that's looking particularly in the U.S., just given U.S. LPA enforcement has taken effect and any impacts you're seeing there? Thanks.

Certainly. So I'll start and then I'll hand to Ruth. We continue to see the very dramatic benefits of, one, the global scale of our business, and two, our centralized procurement capabilities, and what I would say is, as it pertains to some of the supply issues related to equipment procurement across our portfolio, we are not immune to it. In that it is taking significant amounts of our team's time and effort, but it is very manageable for us, given the capabilities we have and the relationships we have. So, it is taking a lot of effort and a lot of time, but we are managing through quite well and it's certainly not having any noticeable or material impact on our business. Perhaps, I'll hand it over to Ruth to provide some more additional color.

Yes. Sure. Connor is right, we're saying it for last time on this topic. Look, supply chain continues to be disrupted, particularly as it pertains to the U.S. thus, ironically is providing some tailwinds elsewhere in terms of being able to procure equipment. So not all bad in our book, and our global supply chain team based out of APAC and also in North America are working their way through this. The counterparts that we were dealing with on the solar side are adjusting traceability with regard to that U.S. PLA, is going further than they expected, and I think it will just take time for those supply chains to adjust to that new requirement. And as Connor mentioned, look, we are not materially affected because of our global diversification. The U.S. challenges are a tailwind to other jurisdictions, and within the US.., it's more for us about the timing of our pipeline. That's helping and we have some flexibility as we mentioned earlier with our counterparts, who are being very constructive where we need them to be. So, managing our way through it. Overall, not material to our business, fortunately, because we didn't have a deep concentration of activity in this period in the U.S., it was global. So that has helped. This has more to go I think. We'll be talking about it for a while.

Our next question comes from the line of Andrew Kuske from Credit Suisse. Your question please.

Thanks. Good morning. Connor, if you could maybe just give us some perspective on any organizational constraints you see right now in the Renewable Group and I asked the question in part, because capital, it doesn't seem to be lacking, opportunity doesn't seem to be lacking given the pipeline that you have. Economics can vary, and that can ebb and slow, but you've also got the global platform, supply chain issues were mentioned earlier, but that also varies by region. So maybe just step back and big picture of the organization, what constraints exist for you to really accelerate growth even another level from where you are now?

Certainly, and appreciate the question, Andrew. No doubt, a big focus is from our side, on the operational level is scaling up our team. And that has been both enhancing the amount of resource we have on the investment side, but you nailed it, in particular, the operating side as well. And we've been looking to scale up our resources, I would say, in all of our markets over the last two years, and well, it is a competitive market out there for acquiring and retaining talent. I would say we feel very, very good about our position and the number and quality of people we brought onboard, it's absolutely not going to slow down. Our capital as you mentioned, is growing the scale up, our operations is growing. So we'll continue to scale our people as well. In terms of limitations on the growth of our business, we're thrilled about this quarter. We're thrilled about how our operations were performing. We're thrilled about the level of growth and what excites us is, we have very good visibility on this level of activity continuing throughout the remainder of 2022. So, while our business is growing and we are requiring a global scale up of our operations, we're certainly not seeing bottlenecks at this point, but it's something that we absolutely need to stay on top of as we take these call it, step changes in terms of growth

I appreciate that color. And then maybe just building upon some of your comments, does the dynamic of being inherently local in multiple markets and then, effectively, that becomes a global to a certain degree. Does that help your competitive offering on attracting and retaining talent?

It absolutely does and it also provides a different benefit, which is, not all markets accelerate at the same pace and we often - when we see opportunities in a specific region, we will pull resources from another region that have relevant experience or relevant knowledge to help us in either growing a business or doing due diligence on an acquisition. So, I think the scale and growth of our platform is attractive to market participants in the space who are looking for roles. But the other thing that we shouldn't underestimate, the benefit of in terms of our global platform, is the ability to pull resources from any geography or any expertise or any asset class and deploy those resources into a specific transaction if they can be useful. We've seen this all over the world. If we're entering a new asset class in a specific geography, we don't learn from zero. We pull very high level knowledge from other parts of the organization to that region, such that we can start ahead of the game and simply accelerate from there.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line Naji Baydoun from iA Capital. Your question please.

To go back to the topic of M&A, clearly out there good liquidity and there is really rush or need to sell assets to fund growth. I'm just wondering if you can talk about that more? Where you're seeing sort of a large-scale opportunities? You've been very successful this year with M&A. Just wondering about the dynamics between smaller scale versus larger scale deal?

Certainly. Thanks, Naji. Perhaps the most interesting thing in the current environment is you mentioned it, we're quite fortunate to have very significant access to capital. Our balance sheet is in a fantastic position. Over the last 12 months we've pulled forth of our lot of our financing activities. We have very little to do over the next 12 months. So we are sitting on significant amounts of liquidity, plus we have our partner capital through the Brookfield Global Transition and Brookfield Infrastructure Funds. We think this could really help in terms of M&A growth as we look forward in the short to medium-term. No doubt, capital markets are a little bit more volatile and those market participants that rely on the capital markets in order to execute M&A may be a little bit less competitive or a little bit more active in the short to medium-term. We are not burdened with those restrictions and therefore, we do think M&A will remain quite active at certainly throughout the remainder of this year.

Would you say then the current market, you're seeing better returns on M&A versus development assets?

It's a good question. Perhaps what I would say is they are certainly not worse. I'm not sure we're quite at the point where we're seeing distressed sellers. I think that would be a misrepresentation of the current market. But what we are seeing is, when we look at assets, there are simply less market participants due to the current economic environment. So, maybe there is some small upside to returns, but perhaps better characterized, that's absolutely not worse.

Okay, that's helpful. And maybe just staying on the topic of competition, I think as we see renewables provided some very interesting details about your joint bid in the offshore wind market in Netherlands. Are you seeing more of these types of opportunities of being able to offer maybe more complex structures versus let's say straightforward government subsidy or versus even your competitors in different markets? And what do you think that strategy of having more tools in your toolbox can really play to our advantage?

The strategy of having more tools in our toolbox, that's been our game plan for years. And there is two things we focus on is, one, is exploiting the benefits of having those additional tools, but, two, constantly adding new tools to our toolbox. And a great example of that is, now we have carbon capture as a decarbonization solution that we can offer to our biggest customers around the world. We didn't have that 12 months ago. In terms of what I would say, Brookfield Renewable, our approach to growth has not changed. We don't compete on cost of capital. We look for opportunities where we can be differentiated either by our size, our global reach, our operating capabilities or our ability to craft a unique solution that is mutually beneficial for both, us and our counterparty, and in the current environment, there is certainly a lot of opportunities to do that because both counterparties are looking for those unique solutions and there are simply less market participants who are well positioned to execute.

Thank you. This does conclude the question-and-answer session of today's program. I would like to hand the program back to Connor Teskey for any further remarks.

Great. We thank everyone for joining the call and the support of our business and we look forward to providing you an update. Thank you and have a great day.

Thank you, ladies and gentlemen for your participation in today's conference. This does conclude the program. You may now disconnect. Good day.