Welcome to the Q4 and Full Year 2014 BGC Partners Inc. Earnings Conference Call. My name is Christine and I will be your operator for today’s call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session. Please note that this conference is being recorded. I will now turn the call over to Jason McGruder, Head of Investor Relations. You may begin.

Good morning. Our fourth quarter 2014 financial results press release was issued this morning. This can be found at either the News Center or Investor Relations section of our website at bgcpartners.com. During today’s call, we will also be referring to a presentation summarizing results, which includes other useful information. This too can be found in the Investor Relations section of our website. Throughout today’s call, we will be referring to our results only on a distributable earnings basis. Please see today’s press release for GAAP results. Please also see the sections of today’s press release entitled distributable earnings results compared with GAAP results, reconciliation of revenues under GAAP and distributable earnings, and reconciliation of GAAP net income, loss to distributable earnings for a definition of these terms and how, when and why management uses them. Unless otherwise stated, whenever we refer to income statement items such as revenues, expenses, pre-tax earnings, or post-tax earnings, we are doing so on a distributable earnings basis. Unless otherwise stated, all results provided on this call compare to fourth quarter of 2014 with a year-earlier period. In addition, certain revenue items and non-financial metrics may have been adjusted for prior periods to conform to current reporting methodology. Any such adjustments would have had no impact on overall revenues or earnings for either GAAP or distributable earnings. On June 28, 2013, BGC sold its fully electronic trading platform for benchmark U.S. Treasury Notes and Bonds to NASDAQ OMX Group. For the purposes of today’s call and on the press release, such assets are referred to eSpeed and the businesses remaining with BGC that are not part of eSpeed maybe referred to as retained. Also, Newmark Grubb Knight Frank is synonymous with NGKF or our Real Estate Services segment. I also remind you that the information on this call regarding our business that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933, as amended and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Such statements involve risks and uncertainties, except as required by law, BGC takes no obligation to release any revisions to forward-looking statements. For a discussion of additional risks and uncertainties, which could cause the actual results to differ from those contained in the forward-looking statements, please see BGC’s Securities and Exchange Commission filings, including, but not limited to, the risk factors set forth in our public filings, including our most recent Form 10-K and any updates to such risk factors contained in subsequent Form 10-Q or Form 8-K filings. Please also refer to the section of today’s press release titled important additional information for a disclosure regarding our tender offer for GFI Group. I am now happy to turn the call over to our host, Howard Lutnick, Chairman and CEO of BGC Partners.

Well said, Jason. Good morning. Thank you for joining us on our fourth quarter 2014 conference call. With me today are BGC’s President, Shaun Lynn; our Chief Operating Officer, Sean Windeatt; and our Chief Financial Officer, Graham Sadler. BGC’s post-tax earnings increased by over 50% to $61 million, which made it the second consecutive record quarter for the company. These best ever results also reflect pre-tax earnings growth of 79% for our high margin fully electronic businesses. Our overall financial services business also improved as volatility picked up across many asset classes. And our Real Estate Services business continued to benefit from robust real estate industry trends. We are confident that the combination of these positive industry dynamics, coupled with our ability to profitably hire and accretively acquire, along with our operational outperformance across both segments will lead to strong growth for the overall company going forward. It is with this backdrop that we expect BGC to have its third consecutive record performance next quarter. Our liquidity exceeds $825 million. And in addition to that, we expect to receive approximately $625 million in NASDAQ OMX stock over time, which provides us with significant capital to profitably hire and make accretive acquisitions, while maintaining our investment grade rating. Our most recently announced acquisitions include Apartment Realty Advisers or ARA and R.P. Martin in London. With respect to GFI, we are very excited that including the 17.1 million shares BGC owns and the 37.9 million shares tendered, stockholders representing 43.3% of GFI shares supported our tender as of last week. Since we only need 45%, we implore those stockholders who have not yet tendered to do so in order to receive the cash value to which they are entitled. We remain confident that our proposed transaction will provide substantial benefits to GFI’s customers, their counterparties, regulators, brokers and their other employees, all of whom should prefer GFI being part of a larger, faster growing and more diversified investment grade company. Following the successful completion of our tender offer, we expect to generate increased productivity per front office employee and to reduce annual expenses by at least $40 million in the first year. We also expect to free up tens of million of dollars of duplicative capital currently set aside by GFI for regulatory and clearing purposes. We therefore believe we can generate considerable earnings accretion and strong cash flow for BGC. I am happy to report that our Board declared a $0.12 qualified dividend for the second quarter which at yesterday’s closing stock price translates into a 5.5% annualized yield. Given our record performance and our strong outlook we expect to raise our dividend next quarter. So with that I will turn the call over to Shaun.

Thanks Howard and good morning everyone. Our Financial Services business increased its pretax earnings by 62.7% to $52.8 million. We were able to achieve this over 700 basis point expansion in pretax margins 20.3% due in large part to significant growth of our higher margins fully electronic businesses. Financial Services revenues were up 5.9% to $260.8 million. These revenues would have been approximately $9 million higher in the quarter, but for the strengthening of U.S. dollar versus various other currencies. Revenues for our e-businesses rose by 53.6% to $27.9 million, while their pretax earnings increased by 78.6% to $15.2 million. This revenue was higher and the growth is much faster than the growth in the second quarter of 2013 over $1.2 billion. We have a pipeline above $900 million of annual voice and hybrid financial services brokerage revenue, a large portion of which can be converted to fully electronic brokerage and generate valuable market data. And our e-businesses revenues were up by approximately 38% year-on-year over the first 26 trading days of 2015 and their pretax earnings margins averaged 54% in 2014. Going forward we expect these businesses to become an ever more valuable part of the company as they continue to grow faster than and to be substantially larger than the eSpeed ever was for us. Looking at our overall financial services results by asset class, while revenues from our fully electronic rates products were up by approximately 35%, our overall rates revenues were down by 9.7% in the quarter to $89.7 million. Because of the sale of eSpeed, our rates businesses is currently geared towards Europe and was negatively impacted by the low volatility environment in the quarter. This is largely why European rate volumes were down by 33% at ICE for example. While the global FX markets…

Thank you, Shaun and good morning everyone. BGC generated consolidated revenues of $515.5 million, up 19.1% compared with $432.9 million. Our revenues from the Americas were up approximately 31%. Revenues from Europe, Middle East and Africa were down by 2%, while Asia-Pacific revenues decreased by 1%. As Shaun mentioned, our non-U.S. results were negatively impacted during the quarter by the stronger U.S. dollar with most of the impact felt in our European offices. Turning to expenses, compensation and employee benefits were up by 18.4% on an absolute basis, but improved slightly to represent 61.8% of revenues. This was despite a larger proportion of revenues coming from real estate. While non-compensation expenses increased in absolute terms by 5.5%, they were down as a percentage of revenues to 24.1% compared to 27.3%. The absolute increase in quarterly non-compensation expenses reflected increased interest expense related to the company’s issuance during the quarter of $300 million of 5.375% senior notes due 2019. The impact of acquisitions and increased professional consulting fees related to the settlement of all legal claims with Tullett. We believe that the settlement will lower legal expenses going forward. Over the course of the past 5 years such fees have totaled tens of millions of dollars. Our pretax earnings before non-controlling interest in subsidiaries and taxes was $72.6 million, up by 57.8% when compared with $46 million. Our pretax margin this quarter expanded by around 350 basis points to 14.1% compared with 10.6% a year ago. BGC’s effective tax rate for distributable earnings was 15% versus 14.5%. Our post tax earnings were up by 50.7% to $60.6 million compared with $40.2 million. Our post tax earnings margin improved by nearly 250 basis points to 11.8% compared with 9.3%, while our post tax earnings per share were up about 38.5% to $0.18.…

Thank you, Graham. Our guidance for the first quarter of 2015 as compared to last year is as follows. We expect to generate revenues of between $490 million and $520 million or an increase of between 10% and 17% when compared with $445.9 million. Our revenue outlook would have been at least $15 million higher, but for the recent strengthening of the U.S. dollar. We anticipate pretax earnings to be between $68 million and $80 million, an increase of between 21% and 42% as compared to $56.2 million. And at the midpoint of our guidance, the company will produce our third record quarter in a row. We expect our effective tax rate to remain unchanged at approximately 15%. Our outlook reflects the fact that commercial real estate service firms are generally seasonally slowest in the first calendar quarter and strongest in the fourth calendar quarter, while the reverse is true for our financial services business. We intend to update our first guidance by the end of our March 2015. Earlier today, we announced that Graham will be retiring. He has done a great job for us over the past six plus years and we will miss him. Graham will be staying with us until we find the replacement. So, this may well not be his last earnings call. We hope you all join us in wishing him the best in his retirement. And now, operator, we would happy to open the call for questions.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And our first question is from Niamh Alexander of KBW. Please go ahead.

Hi. Thanks for taking my question and good morning. And just to kind of go to the balance sheet for a sec if I could, and the $825 million. Thanks for the information, it’s very helpful. So, $825 million is, I think where you are at, at the end of the quarter and then your debt of over $700 million. So, the next cash number is coming down a little bit, but is the – so, just to get a sense that you are due to repay, is it $150 million of the convert is what you are guiding to, so that comes off that. And then there is $100 million settlement come off the cash amount too or is that kind of already elsewhere in the balance sheet?

So that would come off, the $100 million settlement would come up $825 million.

Okay. And then $150 million in the convert is what we come out of the cash. And then you usually do…?

Niamh, we can choose of course to refinance it. It was ordinary debt, which would take off the share count and dramatically lowered our current coupon is in the 8s and we would be able to buy our last debt was 5 and 3. And so we would be able to take 300 basis points off the costs and take the share count out with the covert and dramatically improve the financial results for the company. Just by that or of course we can use our cash to pay off the covert either way. So, those are all possibilities that are in front of the company.

Okay, fair enough. Thanks for clarifying. So, the level the debt you are currently carrying around $700 million or so and you said in the release a couple of time, you want to maintain the investment grade rating. I think it’s emphatic in the release, so quite you need to maintain investment grade rating and then what’s the level of debt to EBITDA, we should kind of keep an eye on and that you’re targeting?

Well, I think we go through that with the – with the rating agencies all the time. I mean, they expect to have adequate coverage of EBITDA to your debt coverage and what you are seeing now as we added to our liquidity in order have substantial resources to execute the GFI – to execute the GFI transaction. And so, I think we are in very good shape with respect to that. And we have more than adequate liquidity to execute that transaction. We also have as you see a continuing growing stake in NASDAQ. However, NASDAQ has been performing very well, and we continued to increase our – value of our investment in NASDAQ. So, we do have the resources available to us, I think relatively straightforward. And with respect to our GFI transaction, I think we are well positioned for it, and we wouldn’t have had the additional debt, but with the fact that we are anticipating doing our tender next week.

Okay. Fair enough. I guess, Howard moving over to the tender then if I could. Howard, just to clarify your target is 45%, so if for example you get to the 45%. If – as you get to that level, can you just walk me through what happens, like do you then close out those people who have tendered or if GFI still kind of looked into to negotiate or not willing to party with them, go into a deal basically, like what is next, do the shareholders kind of hang out or they have an option to pull back, what would happen?

So, we have put a new minimum tender condition, it says that we need to have at least 45%. We would be happy to have 55%, but we know that Jersey Partners has agreed and some – a few others about 40% of the shareholders have agreed with the CME to be constrained, CME can constrain them. So, there is only 60% that you are possibly talking to. And as long at least 45% of them tender, we have a variety of relatively simple conditions in order for us to pay for that stock. And the basic one and the most important one is that the GFI give us control of their Board, give us seats on the Board, just put our Board members on their Board. And should say we are willing to do that at $5.85 for the CME. You would think $6.10 for their shareholders, that’s not really a bold face to comment. I mean, it’s sort of they were agreeing to do that at $5.85 so people are saying why would they do that, it doesn’t make a lot of sense. Of course, they were doing it. There were selling the company to CME. So I think if we are able to get over the 45%, and ask the tender we were at $43.3 million, so very, very close. I think there is a reasonable likelihood that the Board will get together and decide that they prefer to actually do the transaction and then continue to risk the lawsuits, which are against them for breach of fiduciary deal.

Okay. Fair enough. And just kind of for your shareholders perspective, I mean if for some reason GFI still doesn’t want to give up control of the Board, you are willing to kind of take it to the proxy level, but this means that the GFI shareholders have tendered, they would be kind of waiting. They still they don’t get their cash until this see all the way through. So, right now your priority is okay. The CME deal didn’t happen, it’s got control of the Board, so this could take quite a while, right?

I think my opinion is the timing is coming to its end, right, that there is a litigation in front, the plaintiffs have put a litigation in front of Vice Chancellor in Delaware with respect to breach of fiduciary duty by the Board of Directors, that case is scheduled possibly to have a quick trial next week. Our tender is on the 19. I mean, these things are coming to ahead relatively swiftly and I think it’s only a matter of time that the shareholders get $6.10 per share, which is the appropriate cash value that they are supposed to get. And we will have control of the Board, and we will help to make our shareholders and their shareholders more money.

Okay. Fair enough. And just lastly on this issue before I move over to dividend. And the – have you actually signed a non-disclosure agreement and has been to get and start to do due diligence yet?

We haven’t – we haven’t done any due diligence, no. And I don’t really want to talk about anything else with respect to it other than I am giving you my opinion. And we look forward to next week. I mean, we are so close 43.3%, I mean it doesn’t not need many, many shares to go over the 45%. I think it’s not.

Okay. Fair enough. Thank you. And then just on the dividend, thanks for the guidance, expecting it to go up a little bit, but how to think about your targeted payout ratio, has the mindset changed, I mean it used to be 80% or more or so of the distributable earnings, is that a good level to think about?

Yes. I think we have had a general guideline of at least 75% and that’s been our general guideline. Obviously, it’s a general guideline, but the company is doing very well. We have strong outlook. Three record quarters in a row, seems like a trend. So, if we can get there next quarter, which is a midpoint of our guidance. So, I think yes, you can look at least 75% and it’s up to the Board to go from there. But this will be informed by whether we can get the GFI transaction done as well. We think GFI transaction will be because of our scale and our scope and our ability to take cost out of the business. We think it will be highly accretive for us.

Okay. I’ll get back in line. Thank you.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our next question is from Rich Repetto of Sandler O'Neill. Please go ahead.

Yes. Hi, Howard. Good morning.

Good morning.

I guess, the first just to follow-up on the – actually, it’s a new question, but on the Tullett legal expenses, I am not going to make a joke. On the Tullett expenses, can we quantify the tens of millions of dollars, a little bit tighter?

They were running more than – lately, they were running more than $10 million a year. So, it was just a vast expense of legal costs. Sometimes, I think the word waste comes to mind, but cost is cost. And with the expectation that this would continue for us and them well years into the future, the math to our earnings was much less than one might consider. And if you look to their numbers, you would see – I don’t think they recovered substantially more than their legal fees in the whole thing of our settlement here. So, this just needed to go away. We worked it out. It’s behind us. And it will improve our earnings going forward, because we won’t have tens of millions of dollars of legal fees going out. I mean – and that’s just the cost let alone the massive time and effort that goes into these kind of things in preparation. So, I just think it’s much more efficient for my company to be focused going forward. We made that decision and put it behind us.

Great. I got that. And then next on GFI expenses, so you are talking about $40 million in expense base, that’s over $2 billion I believe. So, [indiscernible] is 730, 740, but I guess that still seems pretty conservative to me, $40 million out of $700 million. When you have the similar businesses and I understand you have to pay brokers the high comp ratio, but are we just being conservative here or how do you get to that $40 million?

Yes, I am being conservative. We haven’t done due diligence on the company. We can’t imagine how it couldn’t be at least that, but absolutely yes, we are being conservative.

Okay. And then last question then, Howard, is I guess maybe on the update on the fully electronic. So, you are seeing continued momentum here with the amount of revenue and even look at the incremental margin that you are taking on this. And I know it’s a 50% or 54%, but even you look at as you add to it, I am calculating 70% incremental margins. So, can we go – I know this was asked a lot on the last call, but how are we getting these – do we expect that – it was that just a function of high revenue overall in the quarter? Would we expect that fully electronic number to go down next quarter or stay flat with the percentage of revenue next quarter? What’s happening to convert this business?

Rich, it’s Shaun. We are continuing to covert our pipeline of business basically, but as you know, we have been talking about it for sometime now, but this is now coming to fruition. We are turning more and more of our traditional markets electronic. There has been the driving force of Dodd-Frank and regulation, which has pushed it in North America and the move is happening now in Europe. We are continuing to covert. Yes, you can continue to expect from us that we are going to convert more and more of our business every minute of the day. The challenge has always been the marketplace wanting it, the brokers accepting it, and we think we have broken the back of that. We think that we know that ad brokers are completely aligned their shareholders in their company and they benefit from the good work that we are all doing and they completely embrace technology. I am not saying it’s easy, but we are continuing to forge ahead. So, yes, you continue to expect us to grow, build and expand our electronic platform globally.

Okay. That’s all I had guys. Thank you.

Thank you. And our next question is from Patrick O'Shaughnessy of Raymond James. Please go ahead.

Hey, good morning guys.

Good morning.

So, first question on the commercial real estate business, it was a pretty lofty revenue goal that you guys do out for 2015. How much of the way do you think you can get there with your existing companies that you already own and how much of that is dependent upon doing more acquisitions?

I don’t think we ever depend on more acquisitions, because you can’t count on them, you can’t rely on them and they may not happen. So, I think the answer is we think organic growth and the businesses we have in growing those businesses. And I think we feel good about it, good enough to talk about it on the phone. If we find the right acquisitions at the right price, at the right time and they are accretive, we will add them. They may make making the goal easier, but we are confident and we feel good right where we are right now and that’s why we say things on the phone call. When you can’t say things on the phone to us, we won’t do it unless we are confident we can get it done and buying other companies is not a way to be confident getting things done.

Got it. And then can you talk about where you stand as far as bringing the different subsidiaries of ARA into the BGC fold?

Well, ARA was a series of 16 companies. They had a nice relationship with each other, but that’s about it. They had a sort of a marketing relationship and we are finishing up with those. There are few small ones left that we might finish in the second quarter and even possibly one of the smaller companies might even last in the third quarter, but for all intents and purposes we would expect by the end of the first quarter to have virtually all of it complete that is consequential to our shareholders. There maybe a few smaller offices left, but they would not be overall consequential to the overall operation, consequential to themselves, but to the overall size of BGC and our real estate business, they are just nice to add.

Alright, got it. Thanks. And then your other acquisition during the fourth quarter, R.P. Martin, I believe you closed on the UK assets during, I think mid-December. We didn’t see an increase to your Financial Services headcount during the quarter. That was actually down by one. So, did you bring some of those people over during the fourth quarter and then there was just a little bit of headcount reduction elsewhere in the company?

Yes. We have continued to – as we always do to control the non-performing headcount. We have always been pushing hard, especially as we turn markets electronic to look at our overall headcount to make sure it’s giving everything that we expect of it to push hard and be profitable. And what we have done is that in December the addition of R.P. Martin team really just took us back above the level that we were at before, but there is a lot turnover that’s gone on inside that number.

I don’t think in addition that shows that the headcount, the revenue per head, you have seen another increase in revenue per head, because of letting go the underperforming brokers, bringing on the brokers from R.P. Martin, you should expect that to continue to increase in 2015.

Alright. Great, thank you. Now, switching gears to GFI Group and I appreciate that you are probably limited with what you can talk about, but can you provide some color into kind of what the hang up has been, why you weren’t able to agree to a nondisclosure agreement that their Board was comfortable with?

Sure. The nondisclosure agreement in the past was – had come combined with a no poach, no hire agreement that would have, if we had signed it kept us out of being able to hire people going forward. And if their company had remained independent, which obviously was a contention it would have basically cost us something without any particular benefit. So, we know the industry unbelievably well. We understand the business. We understand the math. We have the scale and scope to have the business be accretive. It is part of us. We didn’t need to give of ourselves in order to get that kind of financial information, a private equity buyer would have to agree and of course they don’t really care, the CME would agree, but they don’t really care, because they weren’t interested and they weren’t even buying the brokers. So, to us it just was a request that did not make sense and was not intended to assist us in doing the transaction. It was intended to basically shackle us. And that’s why we chose not to pursue it there, but we did pursue of course a tender offer to buy the company. So we moved forward.

Got it. Thanks for that color. And then can you characterize the tone of your conversations with GFI’s special committee, because it does sound like you have had some interactions and certainly I think the two special committee members have voted in favor of your tender offer in the past. So, how have those conversations gone and is there anything you can share there?

Well, we had tender offer agreements. They would raise points. We would address their points, discuss with their counsel how to reasonably resolve the points between us, came to a reasonable resolution of those points between us and that were raised and sent them tender offer agreements. That’s about it. I mean, that’s sort of how it went. We tried to address their concerns, tried to resolve them in appropriate business fashion. There was nothing other than appropriate business fashion between counsel. It really wasn’t about business people.

Got it. Great, that’s all from me. Thank you, guys.

Thank you. I will now turn the call back over to the Chairman and CEO, Mr. Howard Lutnick.

Well, thanks very much for joining us. Obviously, the addition of real estate makes the fourth quarter look great. Having a great financial service business makes the first quarter great. The company is doing very, very well, seems to be firing now on more and more cylinders. As the business volatility comes back in financial services, we can see ever better numbers. So, we are confident of the first quarter and we are confident going forward and we look forward to speaking to you next quarter and we would be happy to setup if we are successful with our GFI tender offer. I am sure we will be scheduling something to come back and talk to you then, but we look forward to speaking to you at least next quarter and hopefully before that. So, thank you all for joining us this morning. We look forward to speaking to you soon. Have a great day.

Thank you and thank you ladies and gentlemen. This concludes today’s conference. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.