Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by and welcome to Benchmark Electronics’ Fourth Quarter 2011 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. I’d now like to turn the conference over to your host, Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Don Adam. Please go ahead.

Good morning. Welcome to the Benchmark Electronics Conference Call to discuss our financial results for the fourth quarter of 2011. I’m Don Adam, CFO of Benchmark Electronics. Gayla Delly, our CEO will begin the call today by providing an overview of our fourth quarter performance including the impact of the unprecedented flooding in Thailand. Gayla will also provide our guidance for Q1. I will then follow with a review of our financial metrics for the quarter. After our prepared remarks, Gayla and I will take time for your questions in our Q&A session. We will hold this call to one hour. During this call, we may make projections or other forward-looking statements regarding future events or the future financial performance of the company. We would like to caution you that those statements reflect our current expectations and that actual results or events may differ materially. We’d also like to refer you to Benchmark’s periodic reports that are filed from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the company’s 8K and S4 filing, quarterly filings and Forms 10Q, and our annual report on Form 10-K. These documents contain cautionary language and identify important risk factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from our projections or forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update these projections or forward-looking statements in the future. Now, I’ll turn the call over to Gayla.

Good morning. I thank everyone for joining our call today. First, I would like to begin by thanking our global teams for their strong support and performance during the fourth quarter of 2011. Last year was a very challenging year for Benchmark and we undertook a number of actions to invest in our future. We believe those actions are beginning to show benefits. First, we realigned our sales team last year. We see excellent opportunities coming from this section. Second, we invested significantly in our non-traditional EMS side of the business, expanding our footprint and our Precision Technologies business into Asia. This is also beginning to provide excellent opportunities for our future growth for us. Lastly, as a result of encountering the flood situation in Thailand, we took strong actions to put our customers first in response for this disaster. We invested rapidly and heavily to ensure that our customers’ needs were put first and met to the best of our ability. This, too, has proven to be a positive for Benchmark. In fact, we have several customers who temporarily moved their requirements to second sources and they are now beginning to return their production requirements to Benchmark. Considering the significance of the challenges related to the Thailand flood situation and the results which were achieved, Q4 was very successful for Benchmark. Each of these activities positions us well for 2012 and for our future. Our revenues were $559 million, which exceed the high end of our guidance, which was $475 million to $525 million for the quarter. EPS, excluding restructuring and Thailand flood-related charges, were $0.17, also above our guidance. Our guidance excluded Thailand-related costs. We were pleased to see that customer demand levels were strong across our industry sectors in the fourth quarter. Our cash flows from operations…

Thank you, Gayla. Again, we completed the fourth quarter of 2011 with revenues of $559 million, which exceeded the high end of our guidance for the fourth quarter of $475 million to $525 million and only slightly below our revenues for the third quarter. Our revenues were significantly impacted by the Thailand floods disaster. Our Thailand operations served customers primarily in the Telecom, Industrial Controls and Medical Industry sectors. When comparing Q3 2001 to Q4 2011, revenues from the Computing sectors were up 22%, revenues from the Test and Instrumentation sector were up 11%, revenues from the Telecom sector were down 29%, as this sector was significantly impacted by the Thai floods. Revenues from the Industrial Control sector were down 3%, and revenues from the medical sector were down 2%. Our earnings per share excluding restructuring in the Thailand flood related charges for the quarter were $0.17 and our GAAP earnings per share were $0.05. This compares to $0.37 and $0.31, respectively, in 2010. During the fourth quarter of 2011, we incurred restructuring charges of $3.9 million, which were primarily related to our previously announced closing our Dublin facility. Also included in our financial results are the Thailand flood-related charges including the estimated losses on property and partial estimates of insurance recoveries. Due to the complex accounting rules surrounding these types of losses and how and when to record the corresponding insurance recoveries, the estimates recorded this quarter are not all encompassing. Upon settlement, recoveries from other items including lost profits will be recorded and may result in gains to Benchmark. The following is a summary of the specific items related to the Thailand have been recorded in the line item titled Thailand flood related charges net of insurance in our financial statements. Inventory losses of approximately $40 million; property,…

[Operator instruction] And first, we’ll go to the line of Sean Hannan with Needham & Company.

First question around Telecom you had indicated that this received a pretty notable impact in the flooding in Thailand. Can you provide us a little bit more color around what that business would have looked like ex the flooding? I think then separately, Gayla, you’ve commented as well recently that there was an absence of a budget flash in the fourth quarter. So am just trying to get a sense of where Telecom really should be and then your outlook in that space going forward?

Thank you, Sean. We do see that Telecom as an industry for the customers we serve did not have the strength that it would normally show in Q4, which as we have talked to customers believe is due to a lack of a budget flash in Q4. Having said that as we move into 2012 and as we would have expected barring the Thailand flood, we have won a number of new programs in Telecom which will provide us strength in that industry, but I do not believe that relates to the industry environment, it relates specifically to the new program ramps. Also, you’ll see that that’s really the same situation in several of the other industries and is what we’ve included in our guidance for Q1 that although the seasonality for Q1 for instance would normally indicate that several industries, such as Telco and Computing, might be down because of new program wins, we will actually expect those to be flat or up in contrast to normal seasonality.

So it sounds like there’s pretty solid confidence that at least in that space specifically there should be some notable improvement in ramps through the remainder of 2012.

I wouldn’t say that I have clear visibility into the second half. We have better visibility into the first half of 2012. As always we’re giving guidance only for Q1, but our visibility into Q2 would indicate that it’s sequentially improved based on our program wins and ramps and overall macro environment stabilization. Beyond that I don’t have the visibility to really provide much color on that.

Okay. And separately, in your Precision Machining business, you’ve commented in the past I believe that there was some hope for some recovery later in ’12. What are some of your thoughts there? And then part 2 to that, based on your cost structure today, does that essentially have to come back in order to get your gross margins into that mid-upper-7% range or can overhead absorption from ramps and other assembly business simply get you there?

So consistent with our model and previous guidance, we really look at operating margin, and our target is to get back to our operating margin which we had in 2010 of 4% and that’s where we target to return as we recover from the flood impact of Thailand. And we do that through 2 primary effects. That is, the overall revenue growth as well as the revenue growth and throughput in our expanded Precision Technology support that we have included in Asia. We do see program wins to those provide the revenue growth and to provide the utilization of the Asian PT capability. So we see both of those coming online with, as Don indicated, some margin pressure in the near term as we continue to recover from Thailand and have a duplicative cost and overhead costs associated with that underabsorption.

Next we’ll go to the line of Wamsi Mohan with Bank of America.

I think you said Thailand has been more exposed to Telecom and Industrial Controls, but seems like their revenue was actually quite strong in Industrial Controls. So was it a function of moving some of these customers and programs to Korat faster than expected or was demand that other customers better?

It was mostly that we saw strong demand overall in Industrial Control. So what becomes difficult to say is what that level would have been but for the Thailand flooding. But we would have expected that to be much stronger in Q4. So there was -- most of the impact was from not having that throughput. We did probably have some recovery, but that had been factored into our guidance overall in Thailand.

And sorry if I did not catch this, but did you say that you will have -- did you quantify how much headwind you’ll have from Thailand next quarter?

No, but as you can see in our guidance, we do -- from the guidance provided we don’t get back to our targeted margin rate. It is still below that in our guidance.

Next we’ll go to the line of Sherri Scribner with Deutsche Bank.

I just wanted to get a little more detail on the Computing segment. I know you gave some detail on new customers and the ramp of those new programs, but it looks like Computing was quite strong this quarter, up a bit. It seems like some of those new Computing programs are ramping, but I think you said that you’re not expecting the new program to ramp in the first quarter. So just wanted to understand where the strength came from and how we should expect those programs to ramp over 2012.

So there are several new programs that are incorporated into both our revenue and our Q1 guidance and there was one specific program that was the largest single win over the last 24 months probably, and that program specifically has not ramped and specifically is not expected or incorporated in any material -- to have any material favorable impact in our Q1 guidance. So that’s kind of a call-out separately. Beyond that, our other programs that we’ve won as you’ll note, for several quarters we’ve indicated that we’ve had program wins in each of our industries and several of those programs as well as some strength in existing customers were and are continuing to ramp up in Q4 as well as into Q1.

Okay, great. And then looking at the new program wins this quarter, that also seemed exceptionally strong. You’re usually in the 10-to-20 program type range. I think you said 46 programs which seems quite high. Just trying to understand if that customer is coming back and are you counting that as a program or this -- how is that working and how did you get that higher?

So these are not kind of revision rules of existing product. There were quite a number of engineering projects which we booked and I believe it was 43 and of those, 13 were engineering. But what we have seen and are focused on is the incremental program wins from new and existing customers. And so we are benefitting from expanding in that way and, in fact, you’ll see and as I pointed out in our call notes, some of those are allowing us to get a faster ramp with some relationships and some of the tools, methods and processes being in place. So that’s how you’re seeing some of the programs -- that supplies of the programs or the number of programs increase as well as the speed of the ramp increase.

Next we’ll go to the line of Brian Alexander with Raymond James.

Gayla, do you need to get back to the $600 million revenue run rate per quarter to get back to 4% operating margins, or does it have to be higher than $600 million, because you’re going to be running 2 facilities for a period of time? And maybe just update us on how long you’re going to be running Korat after the first quarter.

Overall, approximately $600 million is about the right level for us to be at to return to our targeted operating margin and 4%. And given the marketplace we see now and the growth in new programs and ramps that we have had, we do expect to keep both of our Thailand facilities open and expect that as we move through 2012, both of those will be very busy and bustling. So I don’t have a crystal ball, but it may very well have been that given the opportunities that we’re seeing now, even without the flood at some point during 2012, we may have elected to reopen Korat anyway, just given the growth opportunities that we have. So with that we would expect that our margin and our absorption will be back as we get close to $600 million and the negative impacts of the flooding subside.

Okay. And then my follow-up, could you talk more about the sales force reorganization that you mentioned in your prepared remarks? And I think you alluded to this last quarter too. Specifically how are you structured today versus how you were structured previously? How have you changed your comp plans if at all and just why does this put you in a better position to win new programs, which it seems like it’s already having an impact. But my guess is there’s a long tail to this where the funnel is probably a lot bigger today than it was a few quarters ago as well.

Absolutely. I wouldn’t say that there is ever any one single change or a silver bullet that you utilize in business development that works. So I won’t go into details specifically of how we were and are organized. But I think it’s important to note that we have modified it. We- -- no significant change specifically, but some new blood, some new activities, ways of approaching the business and are very excited about the results and the opportunities that we’re seeing in the funnel. So I wouldn’t say that there is a formulaic or a specific change, one item that made the difference, but it’s a variety of changes that we’ve made and they are coming together quite nicely.

Any way to quantify how big the funnel is today versus what it was before you made the changes?

No, I don’t have any metric specifically that I would be prepared to share on that other than to say that it’s significantly improved.

Next we’ll go to the line of Jim Suva with Citi.

On that same topic of Thailand, given your guidance, can you help us understand about for the Q1 outlook, how much still headwind or shortage you think Thailand is impacting your total Company’s sales run rate or on the other hand, is there a little bit of additional restocking or double production runs you’re doing that may not carry on sustainably? Just trying to figure out what’s the sustainable goal level kind of Q1 and beyond of what you’re coming up short of or that you may be running duplicative upon?

Jim, very good questions and I guess the way I see it currently is given the fact that we expect and as I indicated, although we don’t have specific guidance to give, Q2 is showing to be stronger than Q1. So given that, I do believe that there is some level of backfill potentially in Q1 associated with Thailand. But further, as I mentioned, some customers did elect and have alternate sources, where they utilize those to meet the needs for December. So I don’t have a specific quantification to say that this is the amount. But from what we’re seeing, the most significant impact that’s driving the growth in Q1 is associated with new programs versus existing programs doubling down and trying to recover from Q4.

That’s great to hear. And then as my follow up, when we think about your new programs ramping, is there anything unique that for will just cause a little bit of operating margin pressure as they ramp? I know you’ve got some ones like that new large computing win in the second half of the year supposed to come in. Or should we just look you’re digesting the margin impact of that as quite normal? Is there anything unique in these new wins, which have an increase in year-over-year, that we should just be mindful of?

So, no. I believe the key there as we have our infrastructure in place. None of these are beyond what we’ve already invested in our infrastructure. As we indicated for our Precision Technologies, none of these are requiring expansion of footprint or significant other investments. We have or costs in place to be able to support the programs and are looking for these to have favorable impact as we ramp them.

Next we’ll go to the line of Ryan Jones with RBC Capital Markets.

Just a quick question on capital allocation. I was wondering 1, if you would be free cash flow positive for the year to expand your visibility? And 2, your buyback has gotten mostly consumed at this point. How should we think about cash going back to shareholders in 2012?

So, for our utilization of cash, we would expect that we will continue the buyback. We have the $35 million remaining and we’ll continue to assess that as we go through the year. Additionally, we will invest in continuing to grow the business and we’ll look at opportunities for growing our business and growing our profitability with additional opportunities that we may see going forward. Overall, for the year, I believe that we will -- cash flow from operation for the Q1 will likely be flat and slightly possibly moot or provide primarily flat for Q1 and then as we move out into the out quarters it will be dependent upon the rate of growth. So if we grow substantially into the second half we would be utilizing cash. But if it doesn’t grow at a rapid rate we would expect it to begin to throw off cash. So it really depends on the size and rate of ramp.

Any thoughts about a dividend?

No. we have not currently looked at a dividend as a vehicle. We primarily have utilized buyback as the vehicle for returning cash.

And then just one final one. Can you talk about have there been any share shifts at all, favorable or unfavorable, as a result of Thailand in the industry?

As I mentioned in the prepared comments, we did see some of our customers, for obvious and rational reasons, shift to second sources or identify how they needed to meet their immediate needs for Q4 demand. But actually I do see that there have been very solid opportunities as a result of the ability to compare and contrast the performance of our Thailand team to some of the other sources, and we’ve had favorable results as several customers have moved back the production to our Thailand team. So again kudos to our Thailand team for their superb performance.

And there are no more questions in queue. I’d like to turn it back for any closing remarks.

Thank you, everyone, for joining us today. We will be in our office if there’s any follow up calls. Thank you.

Ladies and gentlemen, that does conclude our conference for today. Thank you for your participation and for using AT&T Executive Teleconference. You may now disconnect.