Michael W. DePasquale
Management
Great. Two good questions. So let me answer the first one about fingerprints, about the concern of using or touching, touching anything, including the door or anything that you have to touch right in a public venue. So the majority of our fingerprint sales, especially as it relates to enterprise or even consumer, where for example, you can buy our fingerprint scanners on Amazon or jet.com, walmart.com, bell.com, those are personal devices. So they plug into the USB port on your computer and you are using them to access that device and whatever information is behind it. So there are no sanitary issues in that context, although you can have multiple people enroll fundamentally their personal devices. And as our people are working from home, corporations, enterprises want to know that the individuals behind those devices are really who it should be. And so again, their personal devices no concern at all about the sanitary conditions in that regard. The issue with fingerprint or that sanitary scenario in a kiosk venue or for example, we are at the airport, if you're in the go system, right, global entry, when you come in, you have to put your fingerprints down on the 42 scanner to validate yourself. Obviously, those scanners need to be disinfected and wiped down. And so they have glass patterns. So there's no issue with that. That's going to be part and parcel of any process. It's going to be the same thing in the context of opening doors. Everything that you touch, wherever you touch, for example getting into an Uber or that's just part and parcel of our lives. But the majority and bulk of our sales are really our personal devices. The second question is elections. So, as you know, Fred described that we won our first statewide election management solution for a West Coast state. So that's really important and material for us. Do I ever think we'll see a national scenario like that? I doubt it, because elections are very local county, state based, managed process. And so keep in mind that we're not -- they're not using our technology to vote. Individuals are not using it to vote. They're using our technology for the workers to manage access to that information, right. Because they want to know who accesses a voter roll when they access a voter roll to ensure the validity of the election. But do I think we'll see a national scenario like that, I doubt it. And I doubt that we would ever see in our country a biometric driven election system. I think it's just too political and quite frankly, it's too fragmented for a decision like that. Other countries, in particular in the Third World, have adopted that technology because they can force it on individuals. It would be very difficult in our country to do that.