Good morning, and welcome to the BMO Financial Group's Q2 2025 Earnings Release and Conference Call for May 28, 2025. Your host for today is Christine Viau. Please go ahead.

Thank you, and good morning. We will begin today's call with remarks from Darryl White, BMO's CEO, followed by Tayfun Tuzun, our Chief Financial Officer; and Piyush Agrawal, our Chief Risk Officer. Also present to take questions this morning are Ernie Johannson, Head of BMO North American Personal Business Banking; Nadim Hirji, Head of BMO Commercial Banking; Alan Tannenbaum, Head of BMO Capital Markets; Deland Kamanga, Head of BMO Wealth Management; and Darrel Hackett, BMO US CEO. I would ask you to limit to one question during the Q&A to give everyone a chance to participate. As noted on Slide 2, forward-looking statements may be made during this call, which involve assumptions that have inherent risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from these statements. I would also remind listeners that the bank uses non-GAAP financial measures to arrive at adjusted results. Management measures performance on a reported and adjusted basis and considers both useful in assessing underlying business performance. Darryl and Tayfun will be referring to adjusted results in their remarks unless otherwise noted as reported. And I will now turn the call over to Darryl.

Thank you, Christine, and good morning, everyone. Today we delivered another good quarter supporting year-to-date momentum across key performance metrics. We had good revenue and PPPT growth with strength in each of our diversified businesses. We're actively managing for risks and uncertainties in the current environment and executing against a consistent strategy to deliver continued positive operating leverage and ROE improvement. In the quarter, adjusted net income and earnings per share increased 1% from last year to $2 billion and $2.62, respectively, with PPPT growth of 12%. Impaired provisions continued to moderate as expected and we bolstered our performing allowance. Over the last three quarters, we've added more than $850 million to our performing provision, giving us appropriate coverage for the environment and reflecting our disciplined and proactive approach to risk management. Our capital position remains robust with a CET1 ratio of 13.5% as we continue to support clients, invest for growth and return capital to shareholders, including through share buybacks and dividend increases. We've now completed 50% of the NCIB program and today we announced an increase in our dividend of $0.04, up 5% from last year. For the first half of the year, EPS grew 10%, driven by year-to-date revenue growth of 13%. Pre-provision pre-tax earnings of $7.8 billion were up 22% with all bank operating leverage of 5.7%, having met our commitment to positive operating leverage for five consecutive quarters. ROE improved to 10.6% year-to-date. Rebuilding return on equity is our number one imperative and we're executing against our plan. Tayfun today will provide more details on our progress in his remarks. Turning to the businesses. Each of our operating groups delivered solid results and PPPT growth as we continue to focus on enhanced customer experience, deeper one-client relationships and trusted advice. In Canadian personal banking, we…

Thank you, Darryl. Good morning and thank you for joining us. My comments will start on Slide 8. Second quarter reported EPS was $2.5 and net income was $2 billion. Adjusting items are shown on Slide 39. The remainder of my comments will focus on adjusted results. Adjusted EPS was $2.62, up from $2.59 last year and net income was $2 billion, up 1% as strong PPPT growth of 12% was offset by higher performing PCLs as well as a loss of $51 million on the sale of a US non-relationship credit card portfolio, related to our balance sheet optimization strategy to achieve the ROE targets. Revenues increased 9% with good growth across all our businesses, NIM expansion and strong trading and wealth revenue. This was partially offset by markdowns in capital markets, reflecting market conditions. Expenses grew 6% and we delivered positive operating leverage of 2.7%. Total PCLs increased $349 million from the prior year and $43 million from last quarter. Piyush will speak to this in his remarks. Moving to Slide 9. Over the last two quarters, we shared with you our medium-term ROE target for BMO at 15% and 12% for US P&C and the priorities to achieve them. Over the course of the first half of fiscal 2025, we have been executing against our action plans that have resulted in improvements in our year-to-date ROE. I would note that excluding performing PCLs in the first half of the year, which have been elevated, year-to-date ROE would be approaching 11.5%. In line with our commitment, focused expense management has resulted in year-to-date positive operating leverage of 5.7%. Impaired PCLs have improved as expected since the fourth quarter and while the timing of further normalization will depend on the macro environment, it remains a key driver of ROE…

Thank you, Tayfun and good morning, everyone. In line with our prior guidance, impaired provisions for credit losses continued to improve this quarter. At the same time, we remain cautious given the ongoing uncertainty and volatility in the economic environment related to trade policies. The outlook for the Canadian economy has weakened with rising unemployment and declining GDP growth. The US market has shown resilience, but momentum has softened. This weaker macroeconomic outlook relative to Q1 is now incorporated into our base case driving performing PCL of $289 million for the quarter. On Slide 21, performing allowance stands at $4.7 billion, providing good coverage of 69 basis points over performing loans, given the credit profile of the portfolio and our forecast for impaired losses. We continue to monitor closely the outcome of trade negotiations and will incorporate changes to the outlook in the allowance assessment in future quarters. Please turn to Slide 22 for an overview of total and impaired provisions. The total provision for credit losses was $1.1 billion or 63 basis points. Impaired provisions for the quarter was $765 million or 46 basis points, down four basis points from prior quarter and down 20 basis points from Q4. The quarter-over-quarter improvement was primarily due to lower losses in our U.S. commercial business. Personal and business banking impaired losses were $318 million in Canada and $67 million in the US, down $6 million and $19 million, respectively. Delinquencies are continuing to trend up in our Canadian consumer portfolios in line with rising unemployment. We expect these trends to result in moderately higher losses in the unsecured portfolios and we have expanded early customer engagement to help manage these risks. In our commercial businesses, impaired loan provisions were $158 million in Canada and $180 million in the US, down $9…

Thank you. We will now take questions from the telephone lines. [Operator Instructions] First question is from Gabriel Dechaine from National Bank Financial. Please go ahead.

Hi, good morning. I want to ask, I guess, a two-fold question on the ROE story here, which is clearly an emphasis for the bank. In my view and I think mathematically heavily contingent on improvement in the US business. First, we saw loan growth -- commercial loan growth negative sequentially. What's the outlook there? Is there any, I guess, hope that we could see that commercial book turn around into positive growth over the course of the year? And then on the, I guess the funding optimization, we saw a drop in US deposits sequentially, and that's getting rid of higher cost deposits. But as you look, your strategy seems to emphasize let's get some lower cost deposits. How easy is that? How do you execute on it? It's easy to say and it’s perfectly logical, but there's got to be a cost and an execution challenge there. So how long does that take to start seeing an improved funding mix in the US? Thanks.

Yes, Gabe, it's Darryl. Maybe I'll start the response to your question. There was a lot in your question and I might invite, given the market dynamics that you correctly allude to, I'm going to invite Ernie and Nadim to comment as well from the retail and commercial perspectives. Listen, in the US, you're quite right, we're very committed to the ROE rebuild. A lot of that is in the US, as you've seen and as we talked about over the last couple of quarters. I would start by saying that the balance sheet dynamism that you're observing, for sure, it's been muted for a while. That's not just us, that's the industry. If I look at loans, we've been in line with market for a few quarters now in that flattish world. And when I look at deposits, we had some, frankly, we had a lot of opportunity there because our liquidity, which we had lots of and we had built pretty successfully over a couple of years, gave us the opportunity to reprice lower value deposits and you're seeing that in our NIM. Tayfun mentioned that we're up 5 basis points on the NIM, which is pretty impressive. We see more room there as well. So let me make a couple more comments before we come back to how the balance sheet could move because I'm quite impressed with the way our teams aren't just waiting for a rebound in loan demand. Like if I look fundamentally at the US P&C's PPPT delivery, despite little movement in loan demand in the marketplace, it's up 5% year-to-date. It's up 7% year-to-date if you exclude the card loss that Tayfun described earlier and 8% in the quarter. So it's even accelerating quarterly relative to the year-to-date. And why is that? It's because of the pricing and the balance sheet optimization that we've been talking about and we do expect that to continue and we expect to diversify into more fee-generating revenues. So the teams have done a really good job on that and, cycling it round trip back to the ROE journey, when I look back to the 6.2% number that we had in 2024, that's 7% already in 2025 year-to-date. So we're on the journey, we're making these moves and we're executing pretty well against them and that's before an uptick in loan demand, which I've been saying this for some time, but it will come one day, but that would be in addition to everything I've just said. Listen, why don't we have Ernie, can you give a couple of comments from your perspective and then Nadim, please?

Yes, thanks Darryl. And thanks Gabriel for the question. So, two parts to the strategy in the retail bank in the US. One, Darryl's already spoken to, and Tayfun did as well is we're changing our funding mix, and we are fundamentally looking at building deeper relationships in core deposits. So we're going to change that funding mix and you see that today coming through in the NIM improvement, five basis points quarter-over-quarter, but that's 14 basis points year-over-year. And that shift is really critical in our ROE build. But at the same time, we're not giving up on a new customer acquisition, which is really focused on those core checking, savings accounts, money market accounts in our US business. And that performance is based on driving new customers into our franchise and deepening the relationship with the existing. Just to give you a perspective. Our checking account acquisition in the west or in California is up 9%, whereas we're about 7% overall. So you see the California market picking up for us in particular. And then lastly, I would say the effectiveness of our analytics and our marketing is really driving more primacy with our existing customers and driving also the productivity of our sales force. So while you see us reducing those high-cost deposits, we're bringing in new customers and new relationships on checking, savings and money market accounts. So with that, I'll turn it over to Nadim to talk specifically about the loan side on the commercial.

Okay, thanks Ernie. As Darryl mentioned, the borrowing demand in the US has been largely muted as we've seen in recent quarters. That's in line with industry peers, so our results are very similar. At the same time, I think we've mentioned we're focused on acquiring strong ROE loans with appropriate risk-return and full banking relationships, which means we're also optimizing capital away from deals or portfolios that do not meet our long-term return thresholds. But I will tell you Gabriel, our pipelines are healthy. Execution has obviously been delayed due to uncertainty in the market. However, I will say also that in my recent conversations with clients, sentiment is actually improving. And as we get more clarity in the economic environment, as Darryl mentioned, we do expect loan growth to be positive in the back half of the year. And I'll also say that we've seen the month of April show some positive signs already. In the meantime, we're executing on our fee-generating strategic initiatives. So as Darryl mentioned in his opening remark, our TPS and treasury revenue is outpacing our expectations with double-digit growth. This is a significant part of our ROE rebuild journey and our one-client efforts. So referrals between capital markets, commercial and wealth continue to accelerate and again a key part of our ROE rebuild journey. The second part of your question, Gabe, was on the deposit side. So very similar to what Ernie talked about in commercial. As we optimize loans, we're also optimizing the entire balance sheet including deposits. Pipeline is actually very healthy on our deposit side, good core operating deposits. So what we are doing is in a balanced way as we get new client acquisition, which we are each and every day and it's healthy, we are dismissing deposits that, for example, in Q2, what you're seeing is the effect of exiting large-dollar, low-liquidity value, high-cost deposits. And in favor of that we brought in good core operating deposits. And as you saw, we were -- deposit margins are showing about a 5 basis point improvement already. Again, part of the ROE rebuild.

Okay. Well, in the interest of time, I'll say thanks and have a good day.

Thank you. Our following question is from John Aiken and from Jefferies. Please go ahead.

Good morning. Thanks. In terms of the balance sheet restructuring that you're undergoing on the US, obviously good to see the movements in there, the sale of the credit card portfolio. I'm assuming, though, that there are other opportunities that you're exploring. Is there any way that you're able to scale or quantify what these potential opportunities are moving forward? Of course, with the condition that I'm not going to hold you to give an exact number.

Look, we have an ambitious plan to improve our ROE within a very reasonable timeframe. And that means that we have to look at all of our businesses and the entirety of our balance sheet, and we're doing that. I don't have any specific news to share with you today. As we identify them and as we make the decisions, we'll share those decisions with you.

So, Tayfun, can we expect periodic announcements over the period of time where you're trying to improve your ROE? Granted, not expecting everything every quarter, but is this something -- will this -- will the second quarter's experience be representative of what we might be able to expect moving forward?

I think it's reasonable to assume, given again, the plans that we have, that there will be other decisions that we will make along the way. I can't comment on the timing of those decisions, but I think it is reasonable to assume that there will be more.

Understood. Thank you. I'll re-queue.

Thank you. Our following question is from Matthew Lee from Canaccord Genuity. Please go ahead.

Hi, guys. Thanks for taking my question. So at the end of last year, you did a lot of work walking through your US Commercial portfolio. It's really trying to determine areas of risk and looks like maybe it's paying off here with PCLs dropping this quarter. Can you talk about what you're hearing from your US Commercial customers that's getting more comfortable with your current allowances?

Matt, can you just repeat the question, you said just in the US?

Yes, US commercial book. Just, what you're hearing from commercial customers right now, that you're comfortable with the credit situation that you're seeing in that space?

I think our customers are absolutely indifferent and untouched. In fact, we are here as a relationship bank for our customers. So the credit situation is more internal. We've managed through that, as you can see in the sequential improvement across the enterprise. But from a customer perspective, it's growing. The book is very healthy, I would say, in general. I'll probably offer Nadim the opportunity to talk about the US Commercial book.

Yes. Thanks, Piyush. I would say when I think about our conversations with customers and how they're feeling with the environment that we're under, as I mentioned earlier, the sentiment continues to improve and getting more and more positive. The customers are navigating quite well in the environment. They're focusing on cost discipline, working capital management, finding new markets, strategizing about evolution of their business models, as the fiscal policy settles in the market. So, so far we're feeling good about the commercial book, customers are feeling better and we do expect, like I said, some rebound coming in the back half of the year, including some likely rebound in the M&A markets as well.

So I guess you're pretty comfortable with the idea that assuming there's no further tariff impacts, PCL should continue to kind of trend the way that you suggested it would kind of in Q4.

Yes, I would say, the tariff impact, the short answer is even without any tariff impact there is a little bit prolonged uncertainty which is obviously slowing the environment that has an impact on some of the files that are already being worked through, but it's moderate. So, if everything works out the way we expect, I don't see any significant shift in what we've guided you.

Okay. And then I might have missed this, but what's the tariffs that are kind of baked into your base case expectations in your credit model right now?

So in Q2 we took into account what had been announced and, of course, these are stop-go that we hear every week. But our Q2 economic forecast base case saw a significant deterioration. You'll see some of this in our disclosure. If I were to just point you to a couple of metrics, you think about Canadian GDP, six months ago, we were projecting about a 1.82% and in Q2 that was zero to negative 0.2 in our base case in the next 12 months. Even more significant, I would point you to is our Canadian unemployment. Unemployment has a big driver to our PCLs across. Six months ago, we thought unemployment should be improving from 7% down to maybe 6.5%. Now we've got a deteriorating outlook for unemployment with 7% going up to 8%. So you'll see more of these details in our disclosure which really drove our impaired performing PCL in the second quarter.

Okay, thanks. That's helpful.

Thank you. Our following question is from Ebrahim Poonawala from Bank of America. Please go ahead.

Hey, good morning. I guess maybe, Tayfun, following up on the US ROE discussion. Remind us if there's anything from a capital standpoint that we should be mindful of around capital allocation to the US. We have the stress test results coming out which did have an impact on the stock last year, so any kind of expectation. I realize it's an opaque process, but how you are approaching the stress test, anything coming out of that may -- that could inform your capital allocation decision in terms of how much capital you hold in the US bank?

The short answer is no. Some aspects of our capital situation in the US really are related to the strength of the capital position, both with respect to our historical levels as well as with respect to the peers. And it's accreting quite fast, which is just fine. And we expected that, I think we shared that with you at the end of last year that our expectation is still strong accretion in the US. We're quite happy with that. I don't expect this year's CCAR exercise to have any meaningful impact on how we manage capital.

Got it. And if I could follow up on the margin discussion earlier one, I think last quarter you talked about stable margin outlook. You had a decent expansion this quarter. Just if you don't mind spending some time on the puts and takes. I heard you on the deposit mix optimization. But when I look at the US margin at 3.9, it seems to be best-in-class. So, one, do you see that 3.9 margin improving materially from here? And is the bias on the balance sheet, is it asset sensitive, liability sensitive? Just how should we think about that?

So the principle that we have applied in the way we manage our interest rate risk, in the way we manage our balance sheet is one of stability and we've been on that for a number of years now. We try to let the businesses drive our margins with credit spreads as they move and also with discrete balance sheet actions such as the ones that Ernie and Nadim mentioned. As I look ahead, I do expect those actions, as they will remain in place for the duration of our ROE journey to continue to impact our margins. Today as I sit here, I expect them to be positive in the coming quarters. We're not changing our stability target in terms of managing our margin and I'm not expecting a significant improvement in those margins. But probably I had commented on this a couple of quarters ago, I expect a stable margin with some upside, but I want to be cautious about that upside because it tends to be impacted by the movement in market interest rates. So my message is the same as before, Ebrahim.

Got it. Thank you.

Thank you. Our following question is from Doug Young from Desjardins Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Hi, good morning. Piyush, maybe back to you. Just wanted to go back to your comment that you might see impaired PCLs up moderately from here, but to remain manageable. And so just trying to understand or maybe you can kind of flesh out what frames that view given what we hear from team and just your kind of seems to be a little bit more cautiously optimistic outlook. And can you define, up modestly from here, I mean your PCLs have been quite volatile in the last year or so, can you give a kind of a sense of what you mean by moderately?

Yes, sure Doug. So just to give you a sense of the forward trajectory, let's step back, in the last two quarters, you've seen sequential improvement from us, down from 66 basis points to 46 basis points. That's significant progress and it shows you the amount of work the teams have been putting in into our credit portfolios. But in addition to the outcome of what you've seen in the PCL, you're also seeing key portfolio metrics like watchlist and impaired formations at its lowest level in the last five quarters. So this backdrop gives us comfort around the guidance we had given you in the high 40s. And there will be intra-quarter variability, I've always mentioned that because of sometimes the lumpiness of large files. But as you look forward, we're just mindful of the headwinds in the outlook. So the evolving US trade policies has created uncertainty and volatility. And no matter what gets resolved, this uncertainty and volatility itself has taken a toll on consumer and business sentiment. And the way you should think about this is, we've run different scenarios. If I were to give you the scenario rewinding the last three or four months and said there were no tariffs, then we would exactly be in the trend of our guidance. If you take the scenario, things will get resolved, but it will take some time. That's a couple of basis points. So we've given you guidance of high 40s, can add a few basis points just because of the time factor of the resolution. And if things don't get resolved and the tariff wars pick up, then that's a much more adverse scenario that would put us and everybody else probably out of guidance.

That's -- now, that's helpful. And if I can just one quick one. Your net interest revenue just seemed lower in Canada than in the US and just wanted to confirm in the US that includes the loss related to the sale of that portfolio. But just trying to understand like lower non-interest revenues in Canada and US, if there's any big drivers behind that?

No, I think yes, the loss on the sale of the credit card portfolio is included in our numbers in the US. There are a couple of items in Canada that have impacted the trends including the BA fees shifting to net interest income in Canada. And also just keep in mind that Q2 is a -- has three less days in the quarter which tends to impact fees, as well and especially in our P&BB business and our wealth management business.

Okay. So it's just really in the US is the big one. Okay. I appreciate the color. Thank you.

Thank you. Our following question is from Paul Holden from CIBC. Please go ahead.

Thanks. Good morning. Wonder if you can provide similar commentary on what Canadian commercial customers are saying, if the message or sentiments any different than what you're hearing from the US, if there's a little bit more caution?

Yes. Thanks for the question, Paul. Obviously something on everyone's mind. Talking to clients, I would say, it's still similar to the US, it's cautious optimism that this will get resolved in a timely fashion. And when it does, there'll be some sort of tariffs, but it'll be manageable, reasonable, and that our clients feel comfortable that they'll be able to work around it. Most of our Canadian clients there is, I would call a wait-and-see or a watch mode, a little bit of cautiousness. We saw good loan growth in Canada going into the year, Q1 was good, Q2 held up pretty well as well. But we are seeing some moderation and I would expect we're going to see some moderation downwards on the loan growth for the remainder of the year in Canada. But I still expect the loan growth to be positive. So clients are cautious, but there's still activity, but at a decelerating pace.

Okay. And then maybe one question on capital markets, because I think one of the earlier questions on the US is prospect for more M&A in the second half of the year. So maybe a refresh of what the capital markets pipeline looks like. If you have a similar read in terms of potential for more activity in the back half of the year, particularly in the sort of mid-market private equity space where BMO really has a good market position?

Thanks, Paul, and appreciate the question. And I'd be remiss if I didn't just take a second and highlight some of the strength that we've had in our M&A practice, particularly in Canada, around our metals and mining business, energy, and most recently around real estate. So what you're really seeing is a mixed picture around the M&A market. And as you point out, the US has been weaker. And that's certainly the experience post the geopolitical dynamics around the tariff announcements. We are starting to see a pickup in the pace of meetings and pitches and engagement. But as you would anticipate, a number of transactions were deferred and delayed as a result of the market turmoil. So we are more confident in what we're seeing in terms of the pipeline. But as you know, for that market, meetings, mandates turning into revenue can take a little bit of time. So I would describe it as cautiously optimistic.

Okay. That's helpful. That's it from me. Thank you.

Thank you. Our following question is from Darko Mihelic from RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Hi. Thank you. Question for Piyush, sort of twofold in nature, I guess. One is can you describe your exposure to tariff-related industries? And just out of curiosity, why not provide that detail in your deck?

Hi, Darko. So we've got disclosure on the loan portfolio in the deck and, as you know, it's a very well-diversified portfolio across sectors. We've obviously been doing a lot of scenario analysis and stress tests well before the US elections and continue with all of the tariff changes. So from a macro perspective, I think we are seeing the softness in consumer demand and business sentiment that has an impact overall to the broader economy. But more directly to your question, we have analyzed the sectors and the way we've done this is, we've looked at our sectors that are higher risk, medium, low, and I would call those higher risk sectors, the ones you're reading about, agriculture, auto manufacturing, lumber, and when you add those up, those are about 6% of our portfolio in the higher risk, but I'd be remiss if I said that's all high risk because really the risk lies in individual files. So we've spent a lot of time with the teams reviewing our individual files and like us, many of our clients are also safeguarding their interest, their financial flexibility, some people are changing the supply chains, getting ready for what's coming. So I would actually say that the higher risk files within those high-risk industries is probably around 1% of our total exposure.

And is it fair to say that's mostly Canada?

It's a mix. There are -- clients are going to be affected everywhere with what's going on. So there are some in the US and there are some in Canada.

Okay. And what's the biggest industry in that 1% for your particular portfolio?

The biggest pieces will be manufacturing because it's the manufacturing sector that's going to see the brunt of tariffs. These are low-margin industries, very stable. And so, when you see tariffs that have been announced, if they came through, you'll see the biggest impact there because it impacts various pieces of their supply chain.

Okay, great. Thank you.

Thank you. Our following question is from Mario Mendonca from TD Securities. Please go ahead.

Good morning. Slightly different type of question, but it relates to the same themes, which is, a less friendly regime in the US. Political climate in the US. Now, I'm referring to this bill going through Congress that would impose materially higher taxes on residents like Canadians, in the US individuals and corporates. And it relates to this digital tax that Canada has on US tech companies. Now it's entirely possible that this thing dies on the floor of Congress, but it's a meaningful risk and it matters to banks like BMO and other institutions with large US operations. What I'm asking here is, does BMO have a house view on how this plays out? Does this go away or how do you address it if in fact the US does impose materially higher tax rates on Canadian corporations?

So Mario, just like you, we are watching developments and uncertainties are quite high on this topic. And as you know, the US process does not get finalized until the very last moment and we just need to continue to watch. The outcomes are not certain to us enough to have a view today as to what it may mean for BMO. And when it's finalized, we obviously will form our perspective and what we need to do internally at BMO. But at this point, I don't have a good answer for you because of all these uncertainties.

Neither do I. One other sort of follow-up question to Doug's question. Piyush, Doug is asking about what manageable means in terms of higher PCLs. And it's the same sort of thing I'm interested in. What does manageable mean to BMO? Does it mean that the bank can continue to grow earnings, even though higher PCLs emerge because of tariffs? Or does it certainly mean that it wouldn't impact the bank's capital strength that I treat as a given? But does manageable mean you can continue to grow through something like that? Help me understand what manageable means.

Yes, so the short answer is yes. We can continue to grow. Our capital ratios are healthy, our client relationships, our client pipelines are healthy. So there's nothing that changes that story. The manageable was to give you a perspective of the uncertainties in the environment. And so, if we land exactly where we are today with a paused reciprocal tariff and come in at a much lower number than announced that would, because of the delay of the resolution and the softness in the economy in the interim, be a couple of basis points higher. So whether it's one or two or three, that's the range we are thinking about. We're not going back to what you saw in 2024. The only difference that I've continued to carry out is, if nothing gets resolved and we are in this high uncertain environment and back to an April 2nd kind of announcement that, of course, you can see in our base case forecast has a significant impact on Canadian and US economies.

Thank you.

Thank you. Our following question is from Lemar Persaud from Cormark Securities. Please go ahead.

Thanks. I'm wondering if we could kind of look through the impacts of the trade war, because the messaging from your bank and peers seems one of cautious optimism that we could be moving past the trade war. So if you had to guess, does it feel like this recovery would be led by consumer or commercial clients? It's something I'm spending some time thinking about, because it does feel like consumers would be exiting this period of trade uncertainty in kind of a much weaker state than we saw post-COVID. So any thoughts on that?

It's a tough -- it's Darryl, Lemar. It's actually a tough call. You're asking a very good question. I think when you look across Canada, you heard Piyush talk earlier about the outlook at the consumer level. We are seeing upticks in unemployment. We do expect to continue to see upticks in unemployment. And that puts a certain challenge on the household budgets, which can persist. You don't wave a magic wand over that situation and say trade wars are over and then all of a sudden everything's okay and then you see a quick rebound because some damage is done and it can persist. So we're watching that very carefully. On the commercial side, it's actually a little bit mixed, right? So you'll have -- we talked about it in this call, and in other places, you'll have some businesses that are impacted, in some cases could be severely, but they're in the minority. And those folks won't rebound quickly at all, as you and I know. But there are a whole bunch that will and they're building capacity right now and waiting for demand to come back. So, if I had to guess, what you'll end up seeing in that environment that you're hypothesizing around, Lemar, is you'll see some of the consumer businesses come back quickly, but some of them won't. And you'll see the same thing on the consumer side. You'll see a big sort of rebound of demand -- pardon me, on the commercial side, while those that were particularly impacted and targeted will take a long time. And that's probably not what you're hoping for in terms of me telling you it's ones and zeros on your answer, but you have to decompose each of the portfolios and look at them individually.

No, no, that's helpful. And then if I may just tack on to Paul's question there. How do you feel about the loan growth prospects of Canada versus US And I'm trying to take this a step further. I'm talking about actual BMO loan growth here because it really feels like given the timing of the closing of the Bank of the West deal, we never really got to fully appreciate the strength of the combined franchise. So what I'm asking is if you had to look through a period of recovery, is it possible and plausible to expect stronger loan growth in the U.S. just given that kind of setup between the timing of the closing of the Bank of the West deal, that US loan growth should outperform Canada?

Yes, that's possible, plausible, of course, it is. If you kind of read through some of the things you've heard from my colleagues today, you can imagine a scenario where both economies kind of muddle through here for the next couple of quarters. I think what you're really asking is what does 2026, 2027 end up looking like from a balance sheet dynamic perspective. I don't think the US market freezes forever and so there will be a release there. And when there's a release, we've said time and time again, we intend to fully participate in that release and our positioning is very good for that relative to most. I wouldn't go so far though, Lemar, to say that that will come at a stark juxtaposition to what might happen in Canada because there are different dynamics in Canada this time with the -- as I mentioned in my remarks, maybe we'll have a resolution on interprovincial trade barriers. Maybe we will have a pretty significant build Canada infrastructure spend. I think those things will take time to evidence commercial activity underneath it, but they could come. So as I push myself out through 2026, 2027, different factors could produce loan growth in Canada as well.

Appreciate it.

Thank you. Our last question is from Mike Rizvanovic from Scotiabank. Please go ahead.

Good morning. First one, just a quick one for Tayfun on the NIR. And just if we could dig a bit deeper here. So the sequential decline was almost $300 million on the NIR overall on an adjusted basis, and correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the card, the non-relationship card portfolio was only a small fraction of that. So in terms of where Q1 level was at, are you expecting that we sort of see this reflate back to Q1 levels or is Q1 a bit of an anomaly in terms of how strong it was and maybe you just sort of trend at the Q2 level for the second half of the year? I'm just trying to get some more granularity there if you can provide it.

Yes, I do expect the second half of the year to actually be stronger than how you would interpret the quarter-over-quarter decline. The quarter-over-quarter decline does have certain elements, including some of the items in capital markets as well as some of the items that we just mentioned, including the credit card sale and also lesser number of days. That's an important one. That's an actual -- it's not a small one. Our total revenue decline solely tied to days is over $200 million. Not all in non-interest income obviously, but a decent portion of that. So I would expect our non-interest income to go higher from here into Q3 as well as into Q4.

Okay, that's helpful. And then one quick one for Ernie just on the -- on the mortgage growth, a little bit weaker sequentially, I think about half a percent higher. Anything you're seeing in the broker channel? We did have one of your peers that reported earlier suggest that there was a bit of spread pressure on that distribution channel. Are you seeing the same thing? And if so, is this part of the reason why you're maybe pulling back a bit on the [RESOL] (ph) there?

Yes, thanks for the question. Overall on RESOL, if I think about quarter-over-quarter, we're about 1% up and year-over-year, we're 6%. So we're seeing some strong growth. It's the market that as you're well aware of has really slowed down. Our broker channel is still performing as expected and bringing in that quality customer that is new to the housing market. So we're not seeing anything unusual there. Is the market overall more competitive? It's a competitive marketplace and we're, primarily our first job is renewals. Our second job is acquiring new customers that are in the mortgage market, particularly young profile that are in their first-time homebuyers. So I would say overall pleased with the growth and think hopefully as things get more constructive, we'll see a return back to some normality. But prices are down and the sales are down and that's been consecutive for five months. So we think it'll turn and -- but not in any great amount for the back half of this year, but some tight performance. And we're seeing that even as we speak in the past couple of weeks. More listings, so more to come. But pleased with the broker channel overall.

Okay, so no -- you wouldn't flag any spread compression in that channel though.

There's always competitive market across all the channels. So I don't think there's anything even more so than the broker market than I would say just in general, whether it be direct digital or in our branch channel.

Got it. Thanks for the insights.

Thanks.

Thank you. We have no further questions registered at this time. I would now like to turn the meeting back over to Darryl White.

Thank you, operator, and thank you all for your questions this morning. I think you saw today that our results for the quarter continue to position us well for the current dynamic environment and for growth going into 2026. In the meantime, we're continuing to build a strong, resilient organization that's well-equipped to meet both the challenges and the opportunities of the future and our focus is unchanged. It's on effective risk management, digital transformation and client-centric innovation to drive our success. And with that, we look forward to speaking with you again in August. Thanks, everyone.

Thank you. The conference has now ended. Please disconnect your lines at this time. And we thank you for your participation.