So thank you, Gena. First question, with regard to 333, you're correct. We will have PK data of all the species. So we'll have not only BMN 333, but also free CNP levels. Our goal for that study is to see multifold increases in sustained exposure levels for free CNP. And that data will then unlock what comes next. That next study, while we call it one protocol, which it is, it is a multipart protocol that involves both a dose ranging portion as well as a comparative effectiveness portion. And so in that regard, the data that we'll be revealing later this year will be the ungating to move into those patients with achondroplasia to do that dose-ranging study. To pick that final dose, again, that will be in the comparative effectiveness side. On the growth hormone side, I think, you've actually framed it quite nicely. We would not be surprised at all to see that if you combine growth hormone with CNP and achondroplasia patients, that you would see an increase in AGV at 6 or 12 months maybe even out at two years. But historically the challenge for growth hormone hasn't been about those short-term benefits. It's been about whether they translate into meaningful increases in final adult height. And as you mentioned, they've been transient. That's been the challenge. This is, of course, why growth hormone isn't actually routinely recommended by expert guidelines or regulators around the globe except for some unique regions. We also should remember that growth hormone really in this discussion of height is really not the most important measure that we should be talking about. This health and wellness of the patients is, of course, the most important factor. And we haven't seen that with growth hormone, at least to this date that the kind of evidence beyond height could be achieved in patients with achondroplasia. On the contrary, growth hormone really has added problems for patients. There's been acceleration of bone age. We've seen worsening proportionality at different times of course. I mean you just look at the label, there's cardiovascular and metabolic disturbances. And then 1 unique factor that's been brought up by some of the treating physicians, things like tonsillar hypertrophy that don't seem like they'd be a big deal in most children actually in children with airway obstruction can be a very challenging problem. So clearly, these need to be watched very closely with regard to growth hormone. What we're very pleased about with VOXZOGO is, remember, these kids aren't even growth hormone deficient. But what VOXZOGO brings is a targeted therapy. We think, again, we've demonstrated the effects on all those areas beyond height. We talked about craniofacial volume and others in a previous answer and all while maintaining bone health. That's what we think these patients need. That's what they want a safe and dependable targeted therapy for their disease.