Good morning. And welcome to Scotiabank second quarter 2017 results presentation. My name is Jake Lawrence. Presenting to you this morning is Brian Porter, Scotiabank’s President and Chief Executive Officer; Sean McGuckin, our Chief Financial Officer; and Daniel Moore, the bank’s newly appointed Chief Risk Officer. Following our comments this morning, we’ll be glad to take your questions. Also, in the room with us to take questions is Scotiabank’s business line group heads. James O’Sullivan from Canadian Banking; Nacho Deschamps from International Banking; and Dieter Jentsch from Global Banking and Markets. Before we start the call and on behalf of those speaking today, I’d like to refer you to slide two of our presentation, which contains Scotiabank’s caution regarding forward-looking statements. And with that, I’ll now turn the call over to Brian Porter.

Thank you, Jake. And good morning, everyone. I’ll start on slide 4. We are pleased to report our second quarter results to our shareholders. The bank delivered CAD 2.1 billion in earnings and diluted earnings per share of CAD 1.62 for the quarter, up 11% compared to last year. Our return on equity was strong at 14.9% and in line with our medium-term objectives. Turning to our business lines, I’d like to make some brief comments. Canadian Banking delivered a good quarter of earnings, underpinned by solid asset and deposit growth, and a continued focus on improving the customer experience. We’re also making good progress towards reducing structural costs and improving business mix. International Banking delivered another quarter of record earnings, driven by a solid growth across all markets. Overall, our personal and commercial banking businesses are generating approximately 80% of Scotiabank’s earnings, with strong earnings growth and an improving return on equity. Global Banking and Markets also had a better performance in Q2 with both improved efficiency and profitability. At the enterprise level, our structural cost initiatives are progressing ahead of plan. And on an underlying basis, the bank generated positive operating leverage in the quarter. In terms of risk management, overall credit quality has improved year-over-year and continues to be well-managed and within the bank’s risk appetite. The bank is very well capitalized with a strong common equity Tier 1 ratio of 11.3%. Our strong balance sheet continues to provide us with optionality to invest in our businesses organically, grow through acquisitions, and return capital to our shareholders. We’ve said many times before it’s important to get the big picture right. Our bank is performing well and we remain focused on managing for the longer-term. This includes, make it easier for our customers to do business with us, shifting our culture to be more performance oriented, improving our efficiency through our structural cost transformation, and becoming a digital leader in all our major markets. This quarter, Scotiabank was recognized by Retail Banker International as the Latin American retail bank of the year for 2017. And finally, optimizing our business mix to enhance profitability, while maintaining our strong risk culture. These core pillars of our strategic agenda are not changing, whether housing markets shift, NAFTA is modernized, regulatory changes are made, or short-term matters emerge in the latest headlines. Our strategic agenda is designed to meet the needs of our customers, shareholders, and our employees. I will now turn the call over to Sean who will discuss our financial performance for the quarter.

Thanks, Brian. And good morning, everyone. I'll begin on slide six which shows our key financial performance metrics for the current quarter and comparative periods. As Brian mentioned, the bank delivered a good quarter with net income of just over CAD 2 billion in Q2, up 11% year-over-year adjusting for last year’s restructuring charge. Diluted earnings per share were CAD 1.62, also up 11% compared to last year. All three of our business lines delivered strong underlying performances. Revenue on a cash flow equivalent basis was up 4% year-over-year, reflecting 6% growth in net interest income and a 2% increase in non-interest income. Net interest income was driven by higher asset growth in Canadian and International Banking, as well as increased contributions from asset liability management activities. Our core banking margin was 2.54%, up 16 basis points year-over-year. About half of this increase was from the higher margin in International Banking, with the balance mostly from improved asset liability management contributions and asset mix, including lower levels of deposits with banks. Non-interest income on a cash flow equivalent basis was up 2%. Higher banking and wealth management fees of 6% and higher trading and real estate gains were partly offset by a gain on the sale of a business last year, lower investments security gains, and the negative impact of foreign currency translation. Adjusting for the impact of the restructuring charge from last year, non-interest expenses increased 5%. The bank continued to focus investments on business initiatives, which drove higher digital and technology-related expenses. Higher performance-based compensation and employee benefit expenses, in part due to a large benefit last year also contributed to the increase. These costs were partly offset by continued benefits realized from our previously announced structural cost reduction activities. In Q2 2017, we realized CAD 155 million…

Thank you, Sean, and good morning. I’ll begin on slide 13. We remain comfortable with the underlying fundamentals of the bank’s risk portfolios. Results this quarter are within expectations and the loan loss ratio was 49 basis points, a decrease of 15 basis points year-over-year. As Sean said, our energy portfolio remains well managed and had net provisions of only C$ 2 million in Q2. The cumulative energy loan loss ratio since 2015 of 2.1% is well below our guidance of less than 3% until the end of 2017. We remain committed to our guidance and are actively managing all of our exposures. Overall, our retail credit performance in Canada and International is performing as expected. In Canada, we’re seeing higher provisions from the retail portfolio year-over-year. The increase is mainly driven by growth in relatively higher spread loans, reflecting both asset mix and portfolio seasoning. And we’re being adequately compensated for this risk. Provisions in the Canadian Banking have peaked and we are already seeing improvement in delinquency rates across product categories. We expect PCL rates to stabilize in the second half of 2017. Now, given the focus on housing and consumer debt levels, I wanted to make some specific comments here. Our Canadian residential mortgage portfolio of C$197 billion is high quality, with 54% of the portfolio insured. Of the uninsured, our portfolio has an LTV of 51%, providing substantial equity buffer in the event of a housing correction, something which we are not forecasting. Moreover, our new originations in the quarter averaged an LTV of 53%, with Ontario and BC at 52%. Our distribution channel, our new originations from the branch network averaged an LTV of nearly 60%, reflecting a higher level of renewal business on existing mortgages, while remaining broker and sales force channels originate closer…

Thank you, Daniel. Before we open the call for questions, I’d like to highlight some of the key takeaways from our presentation and comment on the outlook for Scotiabank. We delivered strong results in the first half of the year and expect this momentum to continue in the second half of 2017. In Canada, we continue to focus on improving the customer experience by enhancing our digital capabilities, optimizing our business mix, and reducing structural cost. Internationally, our operations delivered another quarter of record earnings and generated strong operating leverage. We continue to see great short and long-term potential across our Pacific Alliance countries. Global Banking and Markets had a strong quarter, with good performance in our trading and corporate lending business and improved credit quality. Our structural cost transformation is tracking very well. We have realized just over 70% of our expected C$350 million in savings for 2017 and are progressing towards a productivity ratio of 50% or better by 2021. As mentioned in my opening comments, we’re focused on the big picture for our customers, shareholders and employees. I’m proud of what we have accomplished in the first half of the year and the progress we are making in implementing our strategic agenda. Heading into the second half of 2017, we continue to execute on our strategy to build an even better bank. And with that, I’ll turn it over to Sean for the Q&A.

Okay. Thanks, Brian. That concludes our prepared remarks. We will now be pleased to take your questions. As I ask every time, please limit yourself to one question and then rejoin the queue to allow everyone the opportunity to participate in the call. Operator, can we have the first question on the phone please?

And we’ll take our first question from Rob Sedran with CIBC Capital Markets.

Hi. Good morning. Just looking at slide 22, the International Banking commercial loan growth, I’m curious if there is any seasonality in this number. I know there’s a similar jump in Q2 of last year. And I know there’s some confidence that the momentum is going to continue, but if you can give us a little more granularity in terms of where and how that’s expected to play out in the second half, it would be appreciated.

Hello. This is Nacho. Well, really, we’re seeing business confidence strengthen in the Pacific Alliance countries. As I mentioned last quarter, our pipeline was getting stronger and we had a very strong growth of 4% in commercial assets this quarter. We expect this momentum to continue. Actually, GDP outlook for the four Pacific Alliance countries for 2018 is higher than this year.

Nacho, can you speak specifically to Mexico and whether the business confidence there and whether you’re seeing activity improve there?

Surely. Well, I think Mexico in particular had a very strong quarter with a lot of not only asset growth, but also the qualities there in all the P&L. I’ve been traveling to the Pacific Alliance countries in the past month. I was in Mexico. As you’ve seen, I think very good management of monetary policy and markets have corrected. And really, if you just look at the indicators like car loans, retail sales in stores, all these indicators are showing good trends. Business confidence is also strong. And quite frankly, although there is a lot of media attention on potential changes of US trade policy, the reality day to day in the companies in credit demand is really strong, positive in our bank in Mexico.

All right.

Thank you.

Next question on the line, please.

And we’ll take our next question from Nick Stogdill with Credit Suisse.

Hi. Good morning. First, just a clarification. Is C$0.04 a good estimate for the real estate gains in the Canadian Banking? And just to clarify, is that related to Canadian bank branch sales or sale leasebacks?

Yes. The year-over-year contribution was about C$0.04 for Canadian Banking and it relates primarily to the sale of – a portion of our retail branches.

Thank you. And then just my question on the International margin. I think you said you’re expecting it to stay above the first half of 2016, so that looks like about 4.65%. So, below 5%, above 4.65%, is that a fair range? And we’ve seen a number of rate cuts in countries outside of Mexico, so Chile, Peru and Colombia are now cutting. Does that contemplate the cuts that have taken place to date or some further ones as well?

Just to clarify, the comment was, the second half of 2017 margin will be a little bit less than the 5% we’ve reported this quarter, but we expect it to be higher than the second half of 2016, producing ongoing margin expansion in the second half of the year. In terms of the rate cuts, as we’ve mentioned before, in Colombia, we actually benefit when rates decline because of the cap mechanism they have on the assets. And in Peru and Chile, we’re not that interest sensitive. So, we don’t get a lot of pickup or decline and margins improve in Chile with rate changes. It’s mostly Mexico and Colombia.

Thank you.

Next question on the line please

We’ll take our next question from Steve Theriault with Eight Capital.

Thanks very much. A question for James. James, on credit cards, that had been a very strong component of the story for a while, but the growth 1% year-on-year, 5% quarter-on-quarter, just wondering, can you talk a bit about – has the card penetration story plateaued a bit here? We had seen some modest upward margin pressure on the back of better mix and higher cards. Will we see any of that in the second half? I think this may be the second consecutive quarter this has fallen off a little. So, I’d be interested to hear a bit on that. James O’Sullivan: Yeah. So, we’ve had – I think this is the third consecutive quarter where we’ve had what I would describe as relatively stable card balances, and I think you should anticipate stable to modestly rising card balances, looking out a couple of quarters as well. The initiative has gone very, very well. We said we would double the portfolio and double the profitability and we’ve done that. The Chase acquisition has been very, very successful and is performing very much as expected. But I think until we define the next leg of growth in cards, which we will at some point, I think you should expect stable to modestly growing balances in cards. And in the interim, we will have a very sharp focus on commercial, on small business and on deposits, all of which should continue to enhance our business mix and narrow the gap in margin.

Okay. And where has that penetration level got to? I think you spoke to it a year or two ago at the Investor Day in terms of percentage of core Scotiabank customers with a card. Can you share that? James O’Sullivan: Yeah. I think we started at around 30 and it would be kind of low to mid 30s currently.

Okay. Next question on the line please.

And we’ll take our next question from Gabriel Dechaine with National Bank Financial.

Good morning. So, I'd just, I guess, to paraphrase James before asking my real question. You're shifting to commercial and small business and deposits growth to get the risk-adjusted margin moving higher again because it's been kind of flat to moving down as the cards growth has slowed. Is that the right interpretation? James O’Sullivan: I think that’s fair. But the other thing I want to be clear on is, at the end of last quarter, a couple of things struck us. One is that we have very strong capital levels. Two is we had asset growth that frankly was lagging some of our domestic peers. And this was at the same time that we had I think an improving macroeconomic outlook in Canada. So, one of the things we’ve decided to do is sensibly – and I want to emphasize that word – sensibly expand the balance sheet, consistent with our risk appetite, and we’re really doing that kind of right across all of our asset classes. But to the extent there is a special focus, I think you should expect that special focus on those asset classes and on deposits that continue to narrow the gap in margin. That remains very much an ongoing medium-term objective. But for the time being, we’re trying to get it right. Little bit of a pause on cards. We’ve got to get the revenue right and we’ll push hard on commercial small business and deposits.

Thanks. So, my main question here is, we saw Puerto Rico territory file for bankruptcy this – in early May. I just want to – and international had a really strong quarter, don't get me wrong. I just want to know if there's any credit surprises we might see over the next little while. I get Puerto Rico questions from time to time. Can we go through your exposures in Puerto Rico, which ones might be exposed, I guess, to this bankruptcy, like maybe not the state itself, but some of their sponsored entities or utilities that they backstop? How is your exposure overall to Puerto Rico?

Gabriel, this is Daniel Moore. In response to that question, we’re looking at government and related exposure, which is I think the question that you’re getting towards. We’ve taken a good look at that portfolio. The filing gives us the opportunity to do that. We consider ourselves to be very well secured both through direct security on the portfolio as well as through reserves against credit losses. So, our direct government exposure of C$270 million is reduced to C$150 million after security and reserves.

And that's it? There's no utilities or other...

That would include security exposure.

Okay, all right. Thank you.

Okay. Next question on the line please.

Our next question will come from Meny Grauman with Cormark Securities.

Hi. Good morning. Given all the issues surrounding some of the smaller lenders, I’m wondering if you can comment, are you seeing anything unusual or interesting at Tangerine specifically on the deposit side, anything – increased flows that are coming to from issues at competitors?

Nothing that would relate, Meny, directly to the situation you describe. But I would say Tangerine is performing well. We are quite pleased with this. As you may be aware, we recently shifted their strategy modestly. We’re going to have them focus very squarely on value conscious Canadians. So, that’s not a geography and it’s not a demographic, but it’s a behavioral reference. And we’re going to use data to reach them. One of the things that we learned from J.D. Power is that 50% of Canadians would consider switching for value reasons. And Tangerine’s value proposition, in fact, as we speak, it’s a key part of their industry-leading customer experience and their J.D. Power scored. So, we’ve got them squarely focused on a strategy and they are succeeding at it. But we’re not seeing any direct impact from the situation you describe.

Thank you.

Okay. Next question on the line please

And we’ll take our next question from Ebrahim Poonawala with Bank of America.

Good morning. I was wondering if you can just comment in terms of capital ratios have remained relatively stable for the last few quarters around 11.3. I see that you’re getting pretty strong organic growth in the International Banking. Just in terms of – Brian, I was wondering if you can talk about cap and deployment opportunities, organic versus M&A, and sort of do you expect capitalizations to remain around these levels for the foreseeable future?

Ebrahim, it’s Brian speaking. As we’ve discussed on the call a number of times, we like optionality as a bank. We’ve got lots of different alternatives to invest our capital organically and we’ve been doing that. And from time to time, we’ll look at acquisitions that are on strategy and we think fit in nicely with our business and that we can integrate well. And there will be opportunities to do that over the course of next year, I suspect. On the acquisition front, I can’t think of one asset that has transacted in the marketplace within our footprint that we wanted to buy that we missed. So, again, we like having the capital position we do. The bank is operating extremely well. It provides us optionality. And when we see something that’s on strategy, we’ll take a hard look at it.

Understood. And just as a follow-up on that, do you expect more opportunities to come in in Canada or in international markets if you had to take a guess in terms of M&A?

It’s always tough to guess. Obviously, M&A is a lumpy business by definition, but I would suspect we’ll see more opportunities in the international footprint over the course of next year.

Thank you so much. You’re welcome.

Thank you. Next question on the line please.

Our next question comes from Mario Mendonca with TD Securities.

Good morning. For Sean or Brian, over the last few years, when banks have announced NCIBs, there really hasn’t been a strong intention at least as far as I could tell to actually execute, but that’s changed recently. We’ve seen a lot more activity there. Without giving away too much on your strategy, what would you suggest? Is this more of an opportunistic or just having the optionality to buy back stock or is there more of a serious intention to do so?

As you’ve heard me say before, or Sean say before, we like to have it in the toolkit. Over the last three years, I think this best describes it, Mario, is that we’ve repurchased 31 million shares. 25 million of that was for option exercise and we’ve done it at an average price of C$65.50. So, we’ve been somewhat tactical in terms of we’ve bought shares back, but we’ll continue to have it in the toolkit and it will be tactical.

So, no difference in emphasis from prior years then?

That’s correct.

And then just real quickly, on the branch closures, and the benefits, what is your outlook there? Is that process essentially complete now?

Mario, if we own equity stake, we would still have about, I don’t know, 220 branches. Half of those would be urban or suburban. The other half would be rural. We view this really as a generational opportunity to achieve pretty remarkable cap rates. So, I think we’re going to continue.

So, we can see some gains materialize going forward in 2017 from the sales?

Yes, you could.

Okay, thank you.

All right. Next question on the line please.

And we’ll take our next question from Sohrab Movahedi from BMO Capital.

Thanks. Brian, it's been an interesting few years. You now have business growth everywhere. Even Dieter has kind of righted the ship on GBM. You look like you're overachieving on cost containment. Credit risk, obviously, not a problem. What is it that you worry about next?

Look, I’m not – I’d turn that phrase around, Sohrab, and I’d say, look, I think the bank is extremely well positioned. We like where we are. We’ve got capital deployed here and we’ll look at acquisitions as they come or potential acquisitions as their on strategy. But the bank is growing nicely organically. The structural cost initiative is working well. The leadership changes that we’ve made – people are settling in their new roles. I think the bank is very well positioned. So, we’re very optimistic about the future of the bank, how we’re positioned and look forward to the balance of 2017 and 2018.

You think – do you think deploying capital in something other than your own company right now is something worth doing or do you think you're a better investment?

Yes. We’ll look at things and there will be opportunities in Canada and outside Canada. We’ve talked about being at scale in certain markets. That’s important to us to drive further efficiencies. It’s important to our customers. We worked hard at making our operating results in Mexico, Peru, Chile, what they are today. We’ve got some work to do in Colombia and we are ready to tackle that. But, no, there will be opportunities, both in Canada and internationally that we look at. This bank has – I use the word optionality a lot. This bank and its shareholders have benefited from optionality in the past and will continue to do so in the future. So, we’re not going to stretch. We’ll be very disciplined at anything we look at. It’s got to be on strategy. It’s got to be accretive and it’s got to meet certain return on capital hurdles, etc. And also, it’s about people. It’s about ease of integration. It’s about systems. It’s about all those things when you’re looking at acquisitions.

Thank you.

You’re welcome.

All right. I think that’s the last question on the call. Thank you all for participating and we look forward to talking to you next quarter.

Thank you.