Earnings Labs

The Beachbody Company, Inc. (BODI)

Q1 2022 Earnings Call· Mon, May 9, 2022

$16.19

+5.89%

Key Takeaways · AI generated
AI summary not yet generated for this transcript. Generation in progress for older transcripts; check back soon, or browse the full transcript below.

Same-Day

-27.59%

1 Week

-28.28%

1 Month

+6.90%

vs S&P

+11.66%

Transcript

Operator

Operator

Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to the Beachbody Company’s First Quarter 2022 Earnings Call. At this time, all participants are in listen-only mode. Following the presentation, we will conduct a question-and-answer session. Instructions will be provide at that time for you to queue up for questions. [Operator Instructions] I would like to remind everyone that this conference call is being recorded. And I will now turn the conference over to Eddie Plank, Beachbody’s Group Vice President of Investor Relations.

Eddie Plank

Analyst

Welcome, everyone, and thank you for joining us for our first quarter 2022 earnings call. With me on the call today is Carl Daikeler, Co-Founder, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of The Beachbody Company; and Sue Collyns, President and Chief Financial Officer. Following Carl's and Sue's prepared remarks, we'll open the call up for questions. Before we get started, I would like to remind you of the company's Safe Harbor language. The statements contained in this conference call, which are not historical facts, may be deemed to constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual future results may differ materially from those suggested in such statements due to a number of risks and uncertainties, all of which are described in the company's filings with the SEC, which includes today's press release. Today's call will include references to non-GAAP financial measures, such as adjusted EBITDA. A reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most comparable GAAP financial measures is available within the earnings release, which can be found on our website. Now, I would like to turn the call over to Carl.

Carl Daikeler

Analyst

Thank you, Eddie, and good afternoon, everyone. When we reported full year earnings for 2021 on March 1st, we outlined our strategy to make the business more productive and efficient, allowing us to deliver profits and free cash flow in every type of demand environment, regardless of whether they're tailwinds or headwinds. While the environment remains challenging, our results for first quarter 2022 reflect solid initial progress on that strategy with revenue and adjusted EBITDA ahead of expectations. During the quarter, we saw a positive response to new product launches, we continued to enhance subscriber lifetime value, and we remain focused on the highest return customer acquisition opportunities, while tightly managing expenses. While there's still more to do, our performance in the first quarter is an important first step; one we'll build on as we continue to advance the strategy over the course of 2022. I'm particularly excited about the response to our new launches in the first quarter. This demonstrates Beachbody's ability to quickly create demand through compelling content, as well as the benefit of our unique synergistic approach that combines digital fitness, Nutrition, and community in the each new program launch. For example, the response to the launch of our job One Full Gram [ph] was incredibly positive as its 20-minute format capitalize on the need for workouts and nutrition programs that aren't only effective, but also easily fit into our busy lives. More recently, the launch of the 4-week Gut Protocol program outpaced early expectations, driving Nutritional upsells among existing subscribers, as well as new customers. This performance supports our thesis that integrating Nutrition and fitness and offering a total solution is a compelling value proposition to both existing and new subscribers. Our launch calendar for 2022 has so much innovation with unique Beachbody offerings that will…

A - Sue Collyns

Analyst

Thanks Carl and good afternoon, everyone. Let me begin by adding to what Carl just said, we remain confident in the long-term opportunity for Beachbody and we continue to see significant levels to deliver profitable growth as we unlock the power of our assets, capitalize on our unique position in the marketplace, and build upon our two plus decades of fitness leadership. Now, turning for Q1 results, our total revenue was $198.9 million and although these results were lower than q1 of last year, they were ahead of our guidance, reflecting the strong momentum driven by innovative launches. We started with our new fitness program Job One in December, and followed by the impressive rollout of 4 Week Gut Protocol on March the 15th. Our digital revenue was at $1.7 million, which was a 14% decline from prior year. And two-thirds of the decline was due to a reclassification of business service fees from preferred customers out of digital and into Nutrition and other revenue. So, adjusting for this geographic shift, our digital revenue would have only declined by 5%. Digital subscriptions decreased year-over-year against a challenging 41% comp increase from the first quarter of 2021. However, compared to the first quarter of 2019, our digital subscriptions increased 48%, reflecting solid adoption digital fitness compared to our pre-pandemic baseline. Engagement or [indiscernible] was down versus prior year, but increased 200 basis points compared to 2019. Quarterly retention levels remained solid throughout both last year and Q1 of 2019, demonstrating our consistency in retaining subscribers through continued content innovation. Our Connected Fitness revenue was $19.5 million, with 16,600 bikes delivered compared to 11,900 bikes delivered in the first quarter of 2021 on a pre-merger basis. Importantly, engagement in the first quarter was higher amongst digital subscribers who own a bike versus…

Carl Daikeler

Analyst

Thanks Sue. I'm extremely grateful for your partnership and leadership throughout your time with the company. You've made many contributions over the past seven and a half years and have played such a key role in some of our most important milestones. I'd also like to welcome Marc Suidan, who officially starts tomorrow as Beachbody's new CFO. Beyond his expertise in various finance functions, Marc also brings with him deep experience in the high growth technology space, and we're confident he'll be a great addition to our leadership team. Marc is joining us at an exciting time. While the environment remains dynamic, we're executing with focus to create profitable productive subscribers and a lean, efficient operating model. For more than 20 years, a discipline of our company has been our commitment to evaluate our business through the lens of the current reality with a willingness to adjust as conditions evolve. First quarter results are a testament to that. Our new products are resonating with customers and we have a solid pipeline of new releases throughout the year. And when you combine that, with our proprietary Coach Network and unique flywheel with Nutrition, and Connected Fitness all united under the Beachbody brand, it creates a powerful virtuous circle that builds momentum over time, and positions us to create value for our shareholders, while delivering on our mission to help millions of people lead healthy and fulfilling lives. And with that, operator, I'd like to open it up for questions please.

Operator

Operator

Thank you. We will now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] The first question is from the line of Joanna Zhao with Bank of America. You may proceed.

Joanna Zhao

Analyst

Hello, thank you for taking my question. I have two questions if I may. 1, one is on the mixed bike segment of the business. Just curious understand, there are three reasons as causing the quarter-over-quarter decline on the margin. Do you have a long-term margin expectation on the mixed bike? And what was the margin like prior to the mix acquisition if you could provide some color on that? And then my second question is on the cashflow needs in the second half of this year, do you foresee the need to raise capital? And if so, what are the plans for the capital raise, would it be through the debt or preferred equity? Thank you.

Sue Collyns

Analyst

Okay, hi there Joanna, thanks very much for those questions. Happy to take the bike and then cash flow and then Carl, feel free to jump in. So, in terms of the bike, we know that the bike business ultimately drove value by enhancing LTV, with more returning customers and from the cohorts we've seen recently, we're starting to see those trends. So, we feel like we're well-positioned in the long-term to deliver positive gross margin over time, but it needs to be resolved by two factors. One is price and one is cost and right now the AOV is has been challenging because the industry works through excess supply. AOV has been pressured but fortunately we don't need to participate in an AOV race to the bottom because our business model is differentiated by the digital and nutritional operates offerings that we give which definitely gives us an advantage. In terms of the cost, also as the supply chain normalizes, our shipping and freight costs will start to reduce and that will help margin. But for us in Q1, one of the factors that impacted our negative Connected Fitness margin was the $50 million NRB non-cash charge. So, on a pro forma basis, if you back that up Joanna, gross margin would have been around negative $10 million, not the negative $25 million. And as I mentioned, where we're seeing encouraging sign on the bike cohorts retaining longer. So, for the rest of the year, though, our focus will be on increasing the bike margin to closer to breakeven. And that gap to breakeven reduces if you take a holistic view from the digital nutritional upsells unfortunately, we will expect to see my back margin improved from now on basically in Q2 through the end of the year as the nutrition upsells go live on the bike tablet, which is scheduled for late Q2, which will improve the economics considerably.

Carl Daikeler

Analyst

I'll just add there too I could. So, if I can just add to that, it's an important -- no, this is just the difference in our business models as we don't have to sell the bikes really to turn our sales flywheel. It's -- we always expected it to be a balance of acquisition tool, but also really a back end business where people who have visibility to the experience our content, they start to see the bike content through their subscription, and they self-select to become one of these super users that want to purchase the bike. But for two decades, the business has been driven by content releases, creating demand for subscriptions, and then nutritional subscriptions. And now that can lead to the LTV contribution of a bike purchase. So, it's in the first quarter, we did move bike inventory at a price that was responding to the environment. Now, we've calm that down and we're really focusing on delivering content at the appropriate value to drive profitable sales transactions into this flywheel, then those subscribers can buy the bike if they when they see that content and want to participate.

Sue Collyns

Analyst

Right, and I think you also asked about the bike margin before the acquisition. It was still below breakeven, I think it was negative 10%, negative 15%. But as I said, the goal will be for us to close that gap between where we are now and the rest of the year, Q2 the bike tablet, upsell to nutritional help us do that, together with the digital sales that we have to consumers streaming that. Just talking -- answering your question related to cash flow and neat profile there. So, you can see no earnings release that we've got no debt. We ended Q1 with $53.4 million of cash and we can fund the business comfortably with cash flow from operations. And we know this because since December, we've actually focused on deploying several initiatives to return to profitability, and manage our cash flow judiciously. And in Q1, those initiatives that enable us to do that and manage working capital from our cash flow included. There are basically three key drivers. One was the One Brand strategy in the platform consolidation that came with that in the reduction in personnel, which is a significant saving Q2 going forward. The second was the reprioritization on media investment to those in year ROI activities. And the third was really actioning, the AlixPartners savings that focused capex to in year payback. And so now we're in a very good place so that in Q1, now cash burn actually was relatively high, because it still included various investments in technology, media and inventory. And those commitments were higher than what we expect for the rest of the year. So, while we have adequate liquidity to manage the business, given the macroeconomic environment, we're also evaluating other liquidity alternatives to give us additional flexibilities. But at the same time, we're constantly looking at additional levers to enhance profitability and efficiency and efficiency. So, I think we're approaching appropriately on all angles.

Joanna Zhao

Analyst

Okay. Thank you.

Operator

Operator

Thank you, Ms. Zhao. The next question is from the line of John Heinbockel with Guggenheim Partners. You may proceed.

John Heinbockel

Analyst

Hey, so I wanted to start $20 million sequential reduction in revenue, right, your 2Q plan versus 1Q, is the bulk of that coming from Nutrition, curious in terms of segment? And then if it is coming predominantly from Nutrition is that basically ARPU as opposed to subscribers, maybe break that out or thoughts on that?

Sue Collyns

Analyst

I think the Q2 guidance that we gave John really reflects the return some more historical seasonality and a focus on immediately high return sales and marketing expenses and Q2 sales mix will maintain the general high to low rank of Nutrition being the highest than Digital and Connected Fitness. But the current competitive dynamics in Connected Fitness market and AOV doesn't merit us chasing that race to the bottom that I mentioned. So -- because our business model isn't reliant on those Connected Fitness sales. So, we basically plan to fulfill that bike demand from awareness created last year as well as in Q1, but expect the Q2 sales to be more weighted towards Nutritional and Digital versus Connected Fitness, per se in Q1, which will also improve margins.

John Heinbockel

Analyst

Okay. and may be secondly, right, in more long-term, right, so you think about the Connected Fitness business, is there an opportunity to somehow partner with hardware providers to basically get out of the bike business, right? Your strength is content, maybe somebody else's is the hardware partner with someone to do that. I guess that could be done on bikes or I'm ready to deliver your content, bikes, treadmills, anything. Can you do that? And then secondly, before COVID, right, EBITDA margin was 8% to 10%. Can you get back there if you're in the Connected Fitness business? And does that matter?

Carl Daikeler

Analyst

So, I think the answer on the last part is connected to the first part. The Connected Fitness business, short of some of the supply chain issues, which we reacted to by getting ahead of that in terms of inventory, now we've got that inventory. So, we're not in a position where we're forced to support an entire infrastructure to produce that bike, we've got the bikes, we delivered the bikes, and the customers having a great experience with it. However, that experience with that screen and the heart rate-based training is sort of integrated into that content that we're creating. So, while it's quite possible that we will partner with other equipment providers to stream our content on their devices, we do think that the proprietary experience on this bike that we've sourced through the mixed fitness purchase is really the best experience, big screen, commercial-grade bike. So now we get the benefit of really just purchasing additional inventory as demand follows. So we don't have to be ahead of it as much. And I think it's -- I think Connected Fitness will always be a part of the business, but the tail won't wag the dog as much as it did really on the back half of 2021 or the first quarter 2022. Now we get the benefit of really returning to this cadence of content launches, leveraging that content to drive nutrition starts and those subscribers that come in then who admire or appreciate the genre of stationary or indoor cycling will recognize the quality of that content that comes along with their subscriptions. So, I absolutely do expect to return to the kind of margins that we've seen historically and better as we scale the business and I don't think that Connected Fitness will continue to be a drag on the overall business performance.

John Heinbockel

Analyst

Okay. Thank you.

Operator

Operator

Thank you, Mr. Heinbockel. The next question is from the line of Jonathan Komp with Baird. You may proceed.

Jonathan Komp

Analyst

Yeah. Hi. Good afternoon. Thank you. Carl, I want to ask first just on the digital subscribers, the $2.5 million. Can you share any more light on how many of those are bad interactive premium subscribers? And then how many are the super users that you mentioned that sort of go across multiple platforms?

Carl Daikeler

Analyst

Yeah. We don't break those files out, Jonathan. I'm sorry, but I will say that the business model is such that the primary subscription pool is the BOD subscriber. And then what we do is as we're on-boarding them, we offer people a free trial in the live content, and we get a significant percentage of the people that will take both subscriptions through this free 30-day trial and then also, obviously, a significant segment of those digital subscribers also become Nutrition subscribers. And then in terms of the super users, those track to bike sales. And, but I don't believe we break out those cohorts in our discussions on these calls.

Jonathan Komp

Analyst

But when you look at the live content any thoughts on how the uptake has been now a few quarters in just as you've made some adjustments to the content and had some time to spend with it?

Carl Daikeler

Analyst

Yeah, actually, that business, frankly as a unit unto itself I feel very good about what it's done since its launch last fall just in terms of the relationship of subscriber count or subscriptions to the cost to produce it. I will say though that one of the significant things that we did in the last two or three months is now is sort of finesse the production so that we maintain our quality and this incredible experience where the subscriber gets to be up there on the screen with the trainer. But we've taken some costs out without sacrificing that distinction, that differentiation in the marketplace. And I would say, if that was a business unto itself, we would consider that a success in this environment. And now we just get to really just pull certain expenses out get a little bit more efficient. For instance, as we're integrating the platforms, moving from a to-platform company to this one single Beachbody on-demand platform, we get to reduce our footprint in terms of how we're producing that live content, and that has a significant decrease in cost. So overall, we're moving in the right direction, and I feel good about the cost structure relative to the demand for those live workouts.

Jonathan Komp

Analyst

Okay. That's helpful. And then maybe one broader question just on the outlook to get back to profitable growth and positive free cash flow. I'm wondering, the path from today to that point, if you could provide any color on sort of when you expect to get there? And then when you look at the bridge and the major moving pieces, how much is coming from the mix business versus how much from the rest of the business? And any comments on the major moving pieces to get there would be helpful. Thank you.

Carl Daikeler

Analyst

Well, I'll just start it up, Sue, and then you do the technical stuff. The primary driver of this business is new content launches. And the -- as we said in the last call, the back half of 2021, the post-pandemic environment was just like spring break. We wanted to get healthy and we've seen this gradually turn with the launch of Job 1, which is quite successful. And now the launch of this four week protocol program was just an enormous success for us. And what that does is it turns the flywheel for our social influencer network, our coaches. As they get more productive, they bring in more coaches who are also more productive. Those people get results, they're promoting them on social media that generates more productivity. This is a snowball effect. And now that the environment of the post-pandemic mindset has given way back to a more normal mindset of people wanting to take care of their health and well-being, we're seeing a return to the productivity of our launches. And I want to make a specific point here. We only had one new program launch in the back half of 2021. And this year, we effectively have seven programs launching in 2022, plus some additional Nutrition launches within our catalog. So we've never had more fuel to work the flywheel and to keep the coaches productive. So this is what gets us -- this is our normal, right? This is our two decades of normal that the business has been so profitable for so many years. And again, selling the bike on the back end of that is accretive to LTV versus trying to force it and make the bike an acquisition tool. Now that we've made that correction and stabilized the business from a cost perspective, it really feels like we're back to our knitting the way we grew this business since 1999. Sue, I don't know what you want to add to that?

Sue Collyns

Analyst

Yeah, I would just say, John, we're modeling conservatively because of the macro environment, which we believe is prudent. And I will tell you that if we look back over the last 20 or so years between the dot-com bubble in 2001, or the global financial crisis in 2008 or even COVID in 2020. Our business model has been resilient because the primary sales lever has been new content, as Carl just said, and only paying coaches, for example, when a sale is made. And it's meant that we've had variable costs versus fixed costs that rule and are fundamental to driving revenue. And that's why we can pivot and realign our costs faster than most because our core business is actually quite CapEx light with variable cost structure. I think the second comment, I'd make just in terms of returning to profitability despite the conservative modeling, clearly accelerated demand in the network or a profitable Connected Fitness are definitely requirements for that path to profitability, but we're really focusing one quarter at a time now and only guiding with our Q2 guidance, but we feel very good, as Carl just said, about the 2020, two launches and also the lineup for 2023. And with various levers that we've deployed that I mentioned associated with one brand and the consolidated platform efficiencies and focusing media and then the partner CapEx savings, all of those are prerequisites and important initiatives that we've taken that will help us achieve the path to profitability and we're obviously working on getting there even faster, but those initiatives were critical and we've executed very diligently, and we are well on our way.

Jonathan Komp

Analyst

And just a follow-up to clarify, I know that the advertising expense increased by more than $100 million from 2019 to 2021. With the sales lower than I think obviously, is expected at one point, do you think you could make a lot of progress getting back to that 2019 level? Or is that not a fair way to look at it?

Sue Collyns

Analyst

I think the selling and marketing expenses in Q1 of 2019 were about $109 million, right, compared to $106 million this quarter. So relatively similar and I think what's interesting about the $106 million that we just spent in Q1 is that roughly over $70 million relates to not just media but also the commission revenue that we pay out coaches. So I mentioned that because we continue to make sizable investments in selling and marketing, right, despite the fact that media which might have a longer-term payback has been curated and pulled in. But we are targeting those highest ROI initiatives with immediate payback via the coach commission and investing in media through the direct marketing channel, with again, a really strong LTV to CAC payback now. So I think it's something -- that line item is something that we will flex on as we see opportunity and as -- but the priority for us right now is getting back to profitability, managing cash, and continuing to launch products that engage customers and ultimately drive the flywheel of business.

Jonathan Komp

Analyst

Okay. Understood. Thank you.

Operator

Operator

Thank you, Mr. Komp. The next question is from the line of Ben Sherlund with Cantor Fitzgerald. You may proceed.

Ben Sherlund

Analyst

.:

Carl Daikeler

Analyst

I think I'll start with that, Sue, if I could. Just the really the way the business model is built, I would sort of change the perspective, I don't believe we're betting big. I think frankly, what we've done is conservatively model against predictable outcomes from our product launches based on a profitable or a more reasonable expectation of return on media based on investing only in those media opportunities that are immediately accretive to cash flow. So we've just tightened what we would call our media allowable. At the same time, we've maximized the efficiency and productivity of our coach network and continue with training programs and incentives to mobilize this incredibly powerful promotional force and marketing team if you will that that only generates an expense if a sale is made. So the tempo of launches that we have for the balance of 2022 is something that we have a very good line of sight to predictability to the outcome of those launches. At the same time that we haven't leaned into it, we're not over our skis, because we've cleaned up our cash burn, we've cleaned up or pulled back on CapEx expenses, because we're still digesting those investments that we've made last year to take advantage of those. Now, we're using content and nutrition to turn the flywheel and return the company to its appropriate relationship of revenue to EBITDA. So that's the way I look at it, I really don't think that the bet in the final quarters, the quarters is hoping that demand returns is actually more looking through the lens of our 20 years of experience in terms of what the outcome is, when we launch a new program into this ecosystem.

Ben Sherlund

Analyst

Okay.

Sue Collyns

Analyst

Yes, I would also just say Ben that we have model conservatively, which isn't to be confused with the fact that if demand would increase, we would get to profitability faster, but we are absolutely not modeling that. And you can see that burn reduction, if you just look at OpEx from Q4, we significantly had impairment and -- but if even if you go back to Q3, OpEx percent of sales is 99%. That's reduced to 84% CapEx, as Carl mentioned. We're now in a position to reap the benefits, especially with the consolidation of Openfit and BOD and enjoying that foundation to run the business. And CapEx is reduced from $28 million in Q4 to $18 million in Q1 and inventory when you go through cash flow has gone from cash used in Q4 to cash provided of about $16 million in Q1. So you're going to continue with this and Q1 will be our highest spent quarter of the year. So you will continue to see improvements in the back end of the year, using our conservative model. And again, if demand were to pick up, they'd be upside from that, but that's not what we're forecasting.

Ben Sherlund

Analyst

Okay. And then maybe it's a follow-up on the OpEx lines. How much of the sales and marketing expense is variable. And kind of looking at 1Q, it's come down off of the peak, even excluding Connected Fitness gross loss, it's not really -- it's barely covering kind of the gross profit from digital and nutritional. So, you guys had to cut down sales and marketing expense dramatically kind of what would that look like? I was on the -- on Google, I mean, trying to compare the price of the bike to the Peloton, and I noticed that you guys are still bidding on Google keywords and Peloton was not. There are something that you see in the market that says, demand is coming back and soon or let me just trying to get a sense of modeling that's free cash flow burn.

Carl Daikeler

Analyst

Well, I'll answer the question on bidding, we’re quite disciplined about the way we approach the whole ecosystem. Obviously, the most difficult thing about media purchasing is attributing orders to particular media. And so our team has done an incredible job of managing media spend to the appropriate ratio of awareness and last click media. And they really pulled that in to the most profitable near term cash flow creative, media mix, frankly, that we've seen in the last three years. And coach network, which is the variable side of it really delivers significant value, taking advantage of these new launches. And in fact, the coaches will create within 72 hours of launching a new program or announcing a new program, it will become a trending term on social media and a searchable term and come up in the top 10 searches for a particular word. So -- but that expense doesn't cost us anything until sales actually happen. I don’t know Sue if you want to breakout the sales and marketing expense, as Ben was asking or not, I'm not sure if you have that note.

Sue Collyns

Analyst

Yes. We -- yes, Carl is exactly right that our coach – I mean, coach expense is a completely variable and they are without a doubt the biggest line item on our P&L. And as Carl said, we only pay our coaches when a sale is made. And for Q1, I think the total amount was about $70 million total media and commission expenses in Q1. So that's the majority -- that's a material. What is that about two-thirds, I think of that selling and marketing line for Q1. And then again, we continue to optimize other line items in technology and development and general administrative, but the other key line item that impacts cash burn quite significantly is CapEx. In 2001, for example, it was about $120 million versus $33 million a CapEx in 2019. And 2020, it was still reasonably high. And this year, it again, we haven't shared that number for the full year, but it's materially lower number than each of certainly 2021 and 2020.

Ben Sherlund

Analyst

Okay. Thanks, guys.

Operator

Operator

Thank you, Sherlund. That concludes the Q&A session. I'll now turn the call back over to Carl Daikeler for closing remarks.

Carl Daikeler

Analyst

All right. Thanks so much. And I appreciate everybody jumping on for us again. Thank you, Sue, for an incredible tenure with us and look forward to our next earnings call. We'll introduce you to Marc Suidan, and hopefully have encouraging news as we really work hard to deliver the shareholder value that we expect and also the results that people need to live healthy fulfilling lives. So thanks for your faith in us, your belief in our mission. And thanks for joining us today.

Operator

Operator

That concludes today's conference call. Thank you for joining and enjoy the rest of your day.

Sue Collyns

Analyst

Thank you.