Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Second Quarter 2013 Hawaii -- Bank of Hawaii Corporation Earnings Conference Call. My name is Jackie, and I will be your coordinator today. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded for replay purposes. I would now like to turn the presentation over to Ms. Cindy Wyrick, Director of Investor Relations. Please proceed.

Thank you, Jackie. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us today as we review the financial results for the Bank of Hawaii second quarter of 2013. Joining me this morning is our Chairman, President and CEO, Peter Ho; our Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer, Kent Lucien; and our Vice Chairman and Chief Risk Officer, Mary Sellers. Comments today will refer to the financial information included in this morning's announcement. Before we get started, let me remind you that today's conference call will contain some forward-looking statements. And while we believe our assumptions are reasonable, there are a variety of reasons that the actual results may differ materially from those projected. And now, I'd like to turn the call over to Peter Ho.

Great. Thanks, Cindy. Good morning, everyone, and thanks for joining us today. Bank of Hawaii delivered safe, consistent and positive results in the second quarter of 2013. Our loans grew 3% from the second quarter last year due to strong commercial, indirect auto and certain other consumer loan growth, partially offset by reductions in refinance sensitive loan categories, mainly residential mortgage and home equity loans. We continued to attract quality deposits during the quarter, with consumer and commercial deposit balances up 4% from last year. Consumer and commercial demand deposits were up 13% and 10%, respectively, in the quarter. Asset quality, as you'd expect, continued to trend positively, and our expenses remained well controlled. At the end of the quarter, our balance sheet remains strong with high levels of liquidity, capital and reserves. And now, let me turn the call over to Kent, who will give you some more detail into the numbers.

Thank you, Peter. Good morning. Net income for the second quarter was $37.8 million or $0.85 per share, compared to $36 million or $0.81 per share in the first quarter and $40.7 million or $0.90 per share in the second quarter of 2012. Our return on assets in the second quarter was 1.12%, and return on equity was 14.6%. Our efficiency ratio was 60%, a reduction from 61.9% in the first quarter. Year-to-date net income was $73.7 million or $1.65 per share, compared to $84.6 million or $1.85 per share in 2012. Year-to-date return on assets is 1.10%, and return on equity is 14.4%. Our year-to-date efficiency ratio is 60.9%. In the last several weeks, longer-term interest rates have increased. The most immediate impact to us is in our mortgage operation. In the second quarter, mortgage income was $5.8 million versus $6.4 million in Q1. Mortgage applications are trending lower into the third quarter, and so we would expect to see still lower mortgage revenue in the second half. Longer term, if rates continue at this level or even increase, we should see our net interest margin increase, but this will take time to be fully realized. Our net interest margin in the second quarter was 2.77%, compared to 2.82% in the first quarter and 2.98% in the second quarter of 2012. The lower margin was primarily due to continued reinvestment in lower yielding securities and relatively high premium amortization. The investment portfolio reinvestment differential was 98 basis points in the second quarter. Premium amortization was $16.8 million, compared to $16.5 million in the first quarter. Going forward, if mortgage and other prepayments slow, then the premium amortization will correspondingly decrease. Also during the quarter, we amended and extended $200 million of private long-term repurchase agreements and thereby lowered the…

Thank you, Kent. Net charge-offs for the second quarter totaled $2.3 million, up $324,000 on a linked quarter basis and down $1.5 million year-over-year. The year-over-year improvement was driven off a $725,000 decrease in C&I net charge-offs and $1.4 million decrease in residential mortgage net charge-offs. Nonperforming assets totaled $36.4 million, down $1.9 million from last quarter and down $5.1 million year-over-year. The linked period decrease was primarily due to a $1.8 million decrease in residential mortgage nonaccrual loans, while year-over-year improvement was driven by a $1.2 million decrease in construction nonaccrual loans and a $3.9 million decrease in residential mortgage nonaccrual loans. We continue to expect the level of nonperforming assets to be impacted in the near term due to the longer resolution time frame for residential assets. At quarter end, loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest totaled $10.6 million, down $1.1 million on a linked quarter basis and up $3.4 million year-over-year. The linked period decrease was due to a $1.8 million decrease in home equity, which was partially offset by a $900,000 increase in residential mortgage loans. Restructured loans not included in nonaccrual loans or loans past due 90 days or more, totaled $39.2 million at quarter end, up $9.1 million from the prior quarter and up $8.1 million year-over-year. Residential mortgage loans modified to assist our customers in retaining their homes accounted for $21.4 million of the total at quarter end. Residential mortgage and home equity loans past due more than 30 days but less than 90 days and still accruing interest, decreased by $3.7 million on a linked quarter basis and increased $3 million year-over-year. We continued to see improvement in what we considered to be the higher-risk segments in our portfolio. In total, these segments were down $8.1 million for the quarter and $12.6 million year-over-year. As Kent indicated, we recorded no provision from loan and lease losses in the second quarter, which given net charge-offs of $2.3 million, reduced the allowance to $124.6 million or 2.13% of outstanding loans and leases. With continued strengthening in the economy and continued improvement or stability in credit quality, we anticipate requiring a lower level of allowance going forward. I'll now turn the call back to Peter.

Great. Thanks, Mary. The Hawaiian economy continued its positive trend in the quarter. Visitor industry continues to be a source of strength for the Hawaiian economy. For the first 5 months of 2013, total visitor arrivals increased by 5.7%, and visitor spending increased by 5.1% compared to the same period in 2012. Oahu's single-family home and condominium median prices rose 9% and 11%, respectively, in June and are up 0.8% and 6.8% year-to-date. Sales volumes remain strong, up 11% for single-family homes and 18% for condominiums year-to-date, and inventories remain at historically low levels at 2.7 months for both categories. Statewide seasonally adjusted unemployment rate declined to 4.6% in June, down from 5.1% at year-end and significantly better than the national rate of 7.6%. We would anticipate the economy to be further augmented by the commencement of a number of both private and public sector construction projects set to take place in the next few years. And now, we'd be happy to entertain your questions.

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Joe Morford.

I guess, questions on the margin. Your comments and release talked about benefiting from the trend higher in rates. Is that primarily going to be through lower premium amortization? Or do you anticipate in doing anything really different on the investment securities side?

Joe, we really don't anticipate doing too much differently in terms of what we're buying in the portfolio. But as I mentioned in my comments, we are about minus 98 points in the quarter in terms of reinvestment. And at present, we're more or less neutral in terms of what we're buying versus the roll-off. And so that, combined with loan growth and further combined with lower premium amortization, that's really the basis for my comments.

Okay. And it suggests that kind of over time, is that likely then kind of more of a fourth quarter event than third quarter you're suggesting or...

I think it's -- there are still events to be determined as to what happens with rates. But I think it is possible to see some slight positive trending even as early as the third quarter. I'd really caution any thinking about dramatic change. These are going to be very, very modest behind the numbers.

Understand. And then just lastly, just can you talk a bit about the shift of securities from AFS to HTM, both this quarter and what's planned, the motivations there and so -- partly to help manage the AOCI issue?

Yes, definitely. It's partly due to capital management. I mean, you always start with the fundamentals, that these various securities, we intend to hold to maturity. But in addition, it will be good or better capital management for us relative to AOCI.

Your next question comes from the line of Aaron Deer with Sandler O'Neill and Partners. Aaron James Deer - Sandler O'Neill + Partners, L.P., Research Division: Just following up on the capital discussion. It seems like you're still pretty comfortable with the share repurchases. But the stock haven't come up now. And I guess with some of the AOCI issues and such, I'm just wondering what -- how comfortable are you with that going forward? And are there any particular capital ratios that you're keeping an eye on in particular?

Well, I mean, the basic strategy of returning as much capital to the shareholders as we can. I mean, that's still relevant. The ratios are -- that we're looking at, Tier 1 leverage, we do want to get that number to 7%. We're just a smidge under that as of the second quarter. But the other ratio we're looking at is the 2C [ph], the risk-weighted ratio, which came down a little bit we saw in the second quarter due to a combination of loan growth and the AOCI charge. So we're looking at all those ratios in terms of our capital decisions. But I think the basic message is we're still pressing forward with the share repurchase program. We wouldn't anticipate any real changes in that. Aaron James Deer - Sandler O'Neill + Partners, L.P., Research Division: Okay. And then, Peter, you mentioned in your comments the -- that there's some construction projects that are going to be coming online over the next couple of years.

Right. Aaron James Deer - Sandler O'Neill + Partners, L.P., Research Division: And obviously, with inventories as low they are, it seems like there's more demand than there is availability. What -- I know that constructions haven't been a big part of your book but what -- can you size kind of the opportunity that you see there? And what does that mean for pricing on your loan book?

Okay. Well, the construction book today is just over $100 million. That book has been up as high as several hundred million in the past. We are a pretty conservative and choosy construction lender, particularly in the vertical construction space. So I would anticipate that there's meaningful upside in that construction portfolio over the next few years, call it. I think the real opportunity for us is in the ancillary activities surrounding the -- surrounding a robust construction environment. So that's C&I lending. That's supporting a lot of the trades and businesses that support construction and development here in the state. And I guess the last piece to this would be, and this is probably extending out a few years, would be the opportunity to increase our purchase, residential mortgage segment, which is purchase is a growing percentage of our originations in mortgage. The problem is inventory levels are so low right now that it's just very difficult to get much volume there. So between the condominiums coming up and some potential single-family home developments further out into several years out, that's a meaningful segment of the overall housing market here in Oahu.

Your next question comes from the line of Nicholas Karzon with Crédit Suisse. Nicholas Karzon - Crédit Suisse AG, Research Division: I guess first, just in thinking about the potential magnitude of the premium amortization decline, can you give us an idea of how the mechanics of that calculation work?

Well, first of all, we estimate the amortization each month, so it's a monthly determination. The first step in the process is an estimate in the mortgage area as to prepayment speed. That is then combined with any actual paydowns on individual securities. Other fixed-tenure securities, the amortization is a known number. It's basically a straight line. So the greatest variable would be the prepayment rate on mortgages. Nicholas Karzon - Crédit Suisse AG, Research Division: Got it. And then second quick question, and this goes back to, I think, your comments on the net interest margin earlier. I noticed that the yield on residential mortgages ticked up a little bit quarter-over-quarter. Is there something unusual there? Or is the average yield actually improving quarter-over-quarter?

Yes, it changed by 4 basis points. Part of that is that the balances came down, so we weren't putting on a lot of new mortgages in the period, so that would be the major change.

The next question comes from the line of Casey Haire with Jefferies. Casey Haire - Jefferies & Company, Inc., Research Division: So I had a question on the expense side. Another good quarter of expense leverage here. I was just wondering with some pretty positive NIM commentary from you guys for the first time in a while, have we kind of reached the end of the line here? Or is there more to come?

On the expense side? Casey Haire - Jefferies & Company, Inc., Research Division: Yes.

Well, I'll kick off and Kent can clean up. We, as I think as you know, Casey, we don't have a prescribed percentage that we're going after. Our view is that we ought to be able to: one, control expenses and potentially even reduce expenses irrespective of the environment that we find ourselves in. So yes, we think that there is further expense opportunity, but it's going to be measured and it's going to be somewhat lumpy. Because as you know, sometimes it takes some expenditure to create longer-term expenditure. But to answer your question, longer term, we do see expenses as an opportunity. Casey Haire - Jefferies & Company, Inc., Research Division: Okay, great. And then on the loan front, obviously, the commercial bucket had a pretty good quarter. How are pipelines today? Are they still strong or are they -- need to backfill a little bit?

The pipes still looks pretty good. And I guess the headliner, certainly this quarter and -- or the past several quarters, has been our commercial mortgage business, which has just performed exceptionally well. What I was heartened to see this quarter was we're beginning to see good C&I growth or are beginning to see good activity within the C&I space. So a good balance there, and I think we've got some pretty reasonable opportunities coming up. Casey Haire - Jefferies & Company, Inc., Research Division: Okay, great. And just one more, the liability restructuring that you guys did on the repo side, at what point was that, early in the quarter, late in the quarter? And is there more opportunity for that going forward?

Yes, it was pretty early in the quarter. And there's some additional opportunity. It's very modest though. The private repos, the total was 600. We did 200 in the quarter and then maybe another $100 million. But the differential in rates is probably much smaller than what I quoted in the second quarter.

Your next question comes from the line of Jeff Rulis with D.A. Davidson. Jeffrey Rulis - D.A. Davidson & Co., Research Division: Peter, just to follow up on that last C&I comment. You're seeing some activity. Is that new production or line draws? And then even specifically, if you had the current level of line utilization, what is that currently versus where it's been last quarter or in quarters past?

Yes. Not a real perceptible change in line utilization. I don't think it's a number that we've divulged in the past. But most of the C&I activity has been centered around M&A activity here in the local marketplace. And a fair amount of businesses just spending capital to get in preparation for what they view as a better economic environment and a more active environment. Jeffrey Rulis - D.A. Davidson & Co., Research Division: And then this was sort of touched on a little bit on the portfolio balance of the residential mortgage category, I guess with sort of slowing refi and an increase in purchase activity, albeit limited, you approaching a bottom on the actual balance in the portfolio? Do you get a sense that runoff will continue for a little while?

Well, we'd like to see things bottom out here. As we look at the numbers going back several quarters, we had so much activity in Q3 and Q4. And we're just, at least in our shop, we're just now catching our breath and getting that activity in place. Likely that's the case, at least throughout our local marketplace. And so we would anticipate, as refinance activity slows, there is a reasonable opportunity for us to create a bottom in both the review [ph] book, as well as potentially, the home equity book.

Your next question comes from the line of Jacque Chimera with KBW. Jacquelynne Chimera - Keefe, Bruyette, & Woods, Inc., Research Division: Looking to the unsettled tax matter that you had talked about, do you have any more of those that are kind of sitting in the back burner that might pop up over the next few quarters?

That's always possible. I mean, it's just the nature of the tax area where resolutions take many, many years. So this particular item goes back over 5 years. So it's always possible, very difficult to predict and nearly impossible to specify timing. Jacquelynne Chimera - Keefe, Bruyette, & Woods, Inc., Research Division: Okay, fair enough. And Kent, just to make sure that I heard you correctly, that was $250 million that were moved into held-to-maturity this quarter and then -- or 2Q, and then $200 million that are moving in 3Q, right?

Yes, that's what I -- that's right. Jacquelynne Chimera - Keefe, Bruyette, & Woods, Inc., Research Division: Okay. And then, I guess just lastly, if you wouldn't mind providing an update on how the traction in the credit card portfolio has been?

It's been very good. Its balances are now up over $4 million, so we've quadrupled our portfolio, Jackie. But the real number for us is we've opened upwards of 6,000 accounts. So the product has been very well received by our client base. People are very satisfied with the features and benefits. We have a few other products coming out in the near future. So it's just been very good augmentation to our product line. And we think as I've told you before I think, longer term, this is going to be a very successful product for us. But it's just going to take a while to season up dollarwise.

Your next question comes from the line of Brett Rabatin with Sterne Agee. Brett D. Rabatin - Sterne Agee & Leach Inc., Research Division: Wanted to maybe follow up on the premium amort just one more time, with the $16.8 million, that's about 100 basis points on your current portfolio. And between 2011 and '12, you were kind of running a $13 million to $14 million premium amort pace. I was just curious if you think it might fall below that with sort of how you see things, Kent. And then I was curious if you were buying Ginnie's at a premium today or kind of you talked about not being neutral from a reinvestment perspective. Could you maybe clarify a little bit on what you're buying?

Yes, I mean, I wouldn't get too carried away with the opportunity in the amortization space. I think directionally, it's going to be positive for us. But it's just not going to be as big initially as we may have seen in earlier periods. So I don't know if that helps you very much, but we're talking about pretty modest but directionally positive changes. Brett D. Rabatin - Sterne Agee & Leach Inc., Research Division: Right. But would it be fair to assume then like a $2 million to $3 million reduction as those prepay speeds slow with sort of be the pace, kind of given what you're buying at premiums still average amortize versus accelerated prepay speed?

That number over several months is possible. If you want to go out much longer, you can think about a little bit bigger number. But I just -- I didn't want you think that it's going to go to half? It's not. In terms of what we're buying, we're buying a little bit more in the municipal space, a little bit more in the corporate space. We're going to bring down the mortgage a little bit, so slight reduction in that area. As I mentioned, we're probably neutral now in terms of roll-off. And the roll-off yield in the second quarter was about 257 -- 2.5%. And that's kind of what we're averaging out between the various investment categories right now. Brett D. Rabatin - Sterne Agee & Leach Inc., Research Division: Okay. And then the other question I had, I know I've asked about this before. But I saw that Hawaii got the first $250 million for the rail project so -- last month. So I was just curious, any update on if that -- might that project might benefit you guys? And if so, can you make loans on the various companies that are going to be doing that?

Yes, Brett. It's -- we think that the potential stimulus created by the rail over the next several years is going to be quite meaningful. And we in fact are lending and are active with a number of companies that are part of that project.

Your next question comes from the line of Matt Keating with Barclays.

I just have a few follow-up questions on the mortgage banking business. It was helpful to hear your commentary that applications were trending lower, I guess, as you moved into 3Q. Can you just provide some quantification around that, perhaps relative to the 7% application -- sorry, decline you experienced last quarter?

Yes, so the figure I quoted was revenue, which is really a combination of servicing income and any gain on the mortgages sold. In terms of applications into the third quarter, probably the way to think about it is between 35% to 45% kind of reduction in volume. It's early into the period, so it's hard to give you a definite figure and that's why I've given you a range. But that's kind of what we're seeing so far.

Got you. And now it sounds like you're making progress in transitioning more to a purchase mortgage mix. Can you just provide, I guess, of your production in 2Q, what was the mix between purchase and refinance?

It's about 80-20 refi to purchase.

Okay. I guess you mentioned the impact on the securities book. Could you just update us on what the AFS net unrealized gain was at the end of the second quarter?

It's -- I think it's 0 now or slightly negative. But that's in the AFS. The total securities, the gain is about, and this is an estimate, $6 million, in that neighborhood. But the AFS is -- there's really no unrealized gains at this point.

Got you. And I'm sure you're quite tired of answering this question. But any signs yet of any impact from sequestration yet on the ground in Hawaii yet? Or is it much the same as last quarter?

It's much the same as last quarter. I guess, some of the bigger pieces where our shipyards. So we have one of the larger -- one of the largest Navy shipyards in the Pacific. That has been designated for no meaningful change, which was a positive. Schofield Barracks, which is a big army base here in the state, basically has been designated for about the same level of troops, so that was a plus. We've got about, I want to say 18,000 federal workers here in the state that were just notified of a 1-day-a-week furlough. So I guess, if you do the math there, up to 20% reduction in wages, so that's have yet to play out. Our sense is, that, yes, the sequestration is going to have some level of impact to Hawaii, but unlikely to completely overwhelm the progress we're making on the visitor and, potentially, construction side.

Your last question comes from the line of John Moran with Macquarie Capital.

Just a quick one on taxes. If I back out the $1.1 million reserve, you get an effective rate of kind of around 32%. Then in the press release, you guys had alluded to some low-income housing deals and other tax credits that are in place here. Is there anything that would suggest maybe that, that 32% grinds structurally lower as we progress through this year? Is 32% kind of the place that think checks out?

Well, that's a good place to start. The effective rate can really vary depending on the level of income because the credit amounts are fixed and so if income goes up, the rate could go up. And contrariwise, if income goes down, the effective rate could be lower. That's the way to think about it.

Okay. Do you happen to have the dollar amount of permanent differences handy?

I do not.

At this time, we have no further questions. Ms. Cindy Wyrick, you may proceed.

I'd like to thank everyone for joining us today and for your continued interest in Bank of Hawaii. As always, if you have any additional questions or any further clarifications, please feel free to give me a call at any time. Thanks, everyone. Have a great day.

Thank you for your participation in today's conference. This concludes the presentation. You may now disconnect. Have a great day.