Good afternoon. My name is Mike and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Box Inc. first quarter fiscal 2018 conference call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speakers' remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions]. I will now turn the call over to Stephanie Wakefield, Vice President of Investor Relations. You may begin your conference

Good afternoon and welcome to Box's first quarter fiscal year 2018 earnings conference call. On the call today, we have Aaron Levie, our CEO and Dylan Smith, our CFO. Following our prepared remarks, we will take questions. Today's call is being webcast and also be available for replay on our Investor Relations website at www.Box.com/investors. Our webcast will be audio only. However, supplemental slides are now available for download from our website. We will also post the highlights of today's call on Twitter at the handle @Boxincir. On this call, we will be making forward-looking statements, including our Q2 and fiscal year 2018 financial guidance, market adoption for our products, our market size, our operating leverage, our expectations regarding achieving and maintaining positive free cash flow and future profitability, our planned investments and growth strategies, our ability to achieve our long-term revenue and other operating model targets and expected benefits from our new products and partnerships. These statements reflect our best judgment based on factors currently known to us and actual events or results may differ materially. Please refer to the press release and the risk factors in the documents we file with the SEC, including our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K for information on risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially. These forward-looking statements are being made as of today, May 31, 2017 and we disclaim any obligation to update or revise these statements should they change or cease to be up-to-date. In addition, during today's call, we will discuss non-GAAP financial measures. These non-GAAP financial measures should be considered in addition to, but not as a substitute for or in isolation from, our GAAP results. You can find additional disclosures regarding these non-GAAP measures, including reconciliations with comparable GAAP results, in our earnings press release and in the related PowerPoint presentation, which can be found on the Investor Relations page of our website. Unless otherwise indicated, all reference to financial measures are on a non-GAAP basis. With that, let me hand it over to Aaron.

Thanks Stephanie and thanks everyone for joining the call. The first quarter was a strong start to our fiscal 2018. We delivered year-over-year revenue growth of 30%, grew billings 31% and generated positive free cash flow. These results demonstrate the significant need for cloud content management in all industries and the inherent leverage in our business model. We also continued our streak of exceeding our guidance since we have gone public and feel confident that the improvements we made in the business over the past year set us up well to reach our goal of $1 billion in revenue in the coming years. This quarter we grew our leadership in the market and now have more than 74,000 paying customers, including new or expanded deployments with McDonald's, Unitedhealth Group, Komatsu, Morningstar, Inc. and the United States Forest Service. We saw particularly strong traction in our international markets, including in Japan and Canada, growth in new products like Box Governance and Zones and further momentum with our strategic partnerships like IBM. As the pioneer in cloud content management, we continue to separate ourselves from the competition by uniquely delivering against the needs of three audiences simultaneously, end users, enterprise IT buyers and application developers. In fiscal 2018, we are focusing on two major objectives. Number one is innovating in cloud content management with additional products and platform capabilities to help move enterprise workloads to the cloud. And number two, advancing our global go-to-market efforts so that we can reach more enterprises all around the world. In Q1, we made solid progress on both fronts. Let's start with innovation in cloud content management. We introduced significant new capabilities to drive continued adoption of our Box KeySafe, Zones, Governance and Platform products. Our product innovation and new products are key competitive differentiators and…

Thanks Aaron. Good afternoon everyone and thank you for joining us today. As Stephanie noted, GAAP to non-GAAP reconciliations are in the presentation that is available on our IR website. The financial measures I will be discussing on this call are non-GAAP unless otherwise noted. We delivered another strong quarter in Q1 with revenue, billings and deferred revenue, all growing at least 30% while also generating positive operating cash flow and free cash flow. These results were driven by strong momentum with our core products, international sales and continued traction with strategic partners. We realized record revenue of $117.2 million in Q1, well above the high-end of our guidance and up 30% year-over-year. First quarter billings came in at $99.6 million, representing 31% calculated billings growth and 32% adjusted billings growth year-over-year. With normalized payment durations going forward, we expect billings growth and revenue growth to continue to track roughly in-line for the full year of fiscal 2018. We maintained the momentum with large enterprise customers, closing 25 deals over $100,000 versus 17 a year ago, two deals over $500,000 versus none a year ago and one deals over $1 million. We sustain the strong traction we have been seeing with our newer products, including Governance, Zones, KeySafe and Platform. We doubled year-over-year bookings for all four products and in Q1 more than 60% of our six-figure deals included at least one of these newer products. Deferred revenue was $224 million, up a solid 30% year-over-year. The growth in deferred revenue was again positively impacted by an enhanced developer access fee from one of our resellers. These results provide us with strong revenue visibility going forward. Turning to margins. With stable pricing in the market and continued infrastructure efficiencies, non-GAAP gross margin came in at 74.5% versus 72.4% a year…

[Operator Instructions]. Your first question is from Philip Winslow from Wells Fargo.

Hi guys. Thanks guys and congrats on a great start to the year. Cash flow, billings, across the board. I really wanted to focus on the upsell, the addons. You talked about a very strong attach rate of 60% of your larger deals having some of the newer products on there and then obviously the big deal metrics were quite strong as well. And you talked about those being sort of more ECM style. I wonder if you can just talk about what do you think is driving that? What do you see in the pipeline as you start to get into more of sort of ECM style deals? Are they replacements? Are they extensions? How should we think through that?

Yes. So I think what we are generally seeing is, first of all, there is an overall kind of maturation happening of this space. And so what's occurring is, customers are recognizing that as they move more and more of their file sharing and collaboration and content management to the cloud that they are going to need to really choose a system of record for their content management. And obviously our whole mission is to be that leader in cloud content management. And as customers put more data into Box and they start to use it in more structured workflows or more regulated use cases, our capabilities around document governance with Box Governance, international data residency with Box Zones or our privacy encryption solution, Box KeySafe start to become very, very relevant for those kind of customers. And so it's just aligning really nicely where the adoption of Box more broadly within organizations is also happening at the same time where we now have a number of these new product capabilities for them to begin to use Box more as that system of record. And additionally, what's extremely exciting is, because of these solutions and because of the position we are building in cloud content management, it's actually beginning to really help customers replace and retire some of their legacy ECM systems. So while usually the day one use case of Box for a new customer coming on-board like a Komatsu or McDonald's or a new large organization, they might start to first of all Box out is really end user collaboration and content management, but then over time really begin to retire legacy systems as we have seen with examples of some large financial services firms and healthcare providers and life sciences providers where they are actually shutting down products like Documentum, OpenText and others and using Box really as their system of record. But this is going to be a multiyear effort to really get customers to retire their legacy systems completely. But in the meantime, they are certainly buying our additional products and rolling Box out really as their system of record for the next set of content in their organization.

Great. Thanks guys. And congrats on getting all the momentum there.

Thank you Phil.

The next question is from Greg McDowell from JMP Securities.

Hi. Thank you very much. I want to dig a little bit into the pipeline generation commentary and maybe tie that to your sales hiring because I think last quarter you discussed a little bit about a 25% increase in quota carrying sales reps. So if you could just talk a little bit about maybe where you are on that ramp of hiring salespeople? If you are ahead of that plan or on track with that plan? And second part of the question, it just has to do with gross margins. I know you are getting a lot of leverage on the gross margin line and yet for the full year we are still at 74%. So if you could just talk through a little bit on, as we model our gross margins coming down for the rest of the year, sort of that are some of the puts and takes we should we be thinking about on the gross margin line. Thanks?

Sure. So on the pipeline and just the overall go-to-market progress, we are very bullish about the momentum we are seeing in the business, really continuing the strong trends that we are seeing, particularly in the back half of last year. So continuing on that we are really pleased with and actually had a record quarter in terms of hiring for sales reps in Q1, a lot of that within the field as well as in international markets where we are seeing opportunities that are emerging especially as a result of some of the newer products that have come to market, particularly Zones. So, really pleased with the progress there. And that combined with the record pipeline that we generated in Q1 really sets us up nicely for growth and continued rep productivity improvements later in the year. And in Q1 bookings per rep were up a little more than 10% year-on-year. So overall, very pleased with the progress they are making there. On the gross margin front, so there are a few puts and takes. And again do expect as you noted that be roughly 74% for the full year. So we talked about some of the puts and takes in the past, but would say that overall some of the big drivers of that are, we are going to be continuing to invest in building out the expanded data center footprint that we are now moved into. One of the big initiatives, especially given the growth that we are seeing internationally is to make sure the Box's performance as possible. So we are going to be lighting up some additional, what we call our global edge network sites to really drive that international improvements and we are going to be continuing to scale out those data centers that I mentioned. I would also note that our Q1 results did benefit a bit from very strong Box consulting margins which we don't expect to see persist throughout the year although we do expect gross margin to be positive. So overall again, expect the margin to be fairly stable throughout the year, although they may move around a bit but kind of settling in around that 74% rate for the year.

That's helpful. Thank you.

Your next question is from George Iwanyc from Oppenheimer.

Thank you for taking my question. Dylan or Aaron, would you give us a sense of competitive environment? What you are seeing, for a like-for-like basis on pricing?

Yes. So on the pricing specifically, that continues to be very stable, has trended over the past several quarters now on average at about $100 per user per year. We actually saw that quite a bit higher in Q1 that's largely due not just because of the really strong attach rate of some of our newer products, but also because due to seasonality. We typically don't see as many very large deals associated with volume discounting versus a Q4, for example. But overall, as it relates to competitive environments, hasn't changed at all as it relates to the pricing dynamic.

Okay. And I know it was a really slight quite increase, but was there anything unusual with the trend that you saw this quarter?

No. Nothing too unusual. It's been trending at the 3% rate, ticked up a bit to 3.5% with one of the dynamics is that we do see a slightly higher churn rate in deals that are sold through our resellers and as that becomes a more substantial part of our business that has a bit of an impact and then we also did see a bit of on increase in M&A activity in our customer base and that, in some cases, does lead to churn as well. So no material drivers, but a couple of little things that combined to have that kind of tick up from about 3% to about 3.5%.

Thank you.

Your next question is from Melissa Gorham from Morgan Stanley.

Hi. This is Josh Baer, on for Melissa. Congrats on the quarter. Have the adoption trends and use case of Box Platform changed of the last year? And have you seen any impact from the recent changes in pricing? Or how do you expect that the pricing changes will impact adoption of Box Platform?

Yes. So this is Aaron. When we first initially started to modify as Box Platform, we did so purely on the dimension of the number of active users and the number of app users that the customer was utilizing on the Platform. And that solved for a set of use cases that we had seen in the customer base that were super powerful like healthcare providers or financial services providers that wanted to create external portals or external applications for their client base. And we continue to see healthy adoption of Box Platform for some of those use cases and it's still something where we are rolling that out into the customer base. We did want to update our pricing model though to be supportive of a broader range of use cases. So if a client wanted to just replace some of their legacy enterprise content management capabilities and use Box as a backend system for some of the applications that they had developed, we wanted to ensure that there is a little bit more flexibility in the different ways that Box was able to be supporting those use cases. And so, we are moving over time to a little bit more of a broader usage or resource-based pricing model that will support all the varied use cases that our customers have, especially those where they are replacing legacy content management systems with Box so we can support that broader range of use cases, while at the same time were actually still seeing some really great examples of that same user base pricing model be very powerful a number of customers. We are working with a large financial services firm right now that's working on a customer facing financial advisory experience. We are seeing that example really kind of be replicated across the financial services ecosystem and a number of other industries as well. So I think we are going to continue to see pretty healthy use cases across a very wide spectrum of applications being built.

Thank you.

Your next question is from Mark Murphy from JPMorgan.

Yes. Thank you. Dylan, so I think you had commented that the deferred revenue growth was once again impacted by an enhanced developer access fee from one of your partners. Just curious, I think that's happened a couple of times now. Is that maybe becoming more of a sustainable trend? And could you just comment on the magnitude of that amount? And I am curious whether that landed in the current deferred revenue or the long-term deferred revenue?

Sure. So it's the same kind of fee that we called out on our Q4 call as well. So it is a recurring and we are not recognizing all of the revenue in the period, which is why it's still sitting in deferred revenue and it is short-term deferred revenue. Again, as a reminder, it's basically a good partner of ours is using our platform to develop products for their customers. So that shows up in both backlog and deferred. And we called that out, it's a fairly large transaction with respect to the magnitude. It's kind of in the mid-seven figure range. And that was baked into our expectations with some pretty good visibility heading into the year with respect to how that was going to play out this year.

Okay. And as well, you commented on the deferred revenue. The drawdown in the current deferred revenue was a little larger than I maybe would have expected. Just comparing it to prior years, it was drawn down by about $20 million. I am just curious, what was the underlying dynamic there? And do you think that that would bounce back to more seasonal kind of sequential growth rates in fiscal Q2?

Sure. So it was largely just due to the seasonality or the trends that we are seeing with Q4 typically being our strongest billings quarter and Q1 being the weakest seasonally. And short-term deferreds were up 34% year-on-year. So actually higher growth rate than our overall deferred revenue which was up 30% year-on-year. But yes, we would expect the same types of trends that we have seen in past years with respect to seasonality and growth of deferred revenue throughout the year.

Okay. And then the last one. Aaron, I wanted to ask you regarding the Fujitsu partnership. Is there any way to compare and contrast that to the IBM partnership at this point of time just in terms of how quickly it's ramping? And I think many of us are just curious whether you think that Fujitsu partnership has potential to be as successful in Japan as IBM has been in the U.S. and elsewhere?

Yes. So we have been incredibly happy and found the IBM partnership to be very effective and successful in terms of growing especially in markets where we don't have people on the ground or the same level of relationship with a client as IBM. And IBM is a little bit different, in that there is so much technology that we are either embedding into or codeveloping with them. But we are taking the template of success that we saw with IBM and trying to bring that to other major strategic partners in different regions all around the world. So I think that there are a lot of similarities in terms of how we are going to execute and go-to-market with Fujitsu to IBM. I would also note that in Japan, we already have a lot of success with our channel ecosystem broadly. It's a very channel oriented environment. And so the very core was that we go-to-market within Japan is largely through channel partners with our own set of individuals as sort of experts in the sales process. So I think we would expect to see Fujitsu as just one of the largest Japanese partners that we work with in going to market over time. And so we are learning from the IBM partnership on a global basis, but we also have success that we can replicate within Japan specifically. And I think we kind of touched of briefly is, overall across the international markets that we are serving, we are seeing just really, really exciting opportunities ahead. When we look at Germany, when we look at Australia, when we look at Canada, Japan, broadly throughout Europe, we are seeing a lot of interest and excitement around Box. And so I think you will see us have these sort of regionally specific partners that do help us sort of accelerate growth in these regions as appropriate.

Thank you.

The next question is from Rob Owens from Pacific Crest Securities.

Hi guys. This is Mike Casado, on for Rob. Thanks for taking my question. Can you provide some more color on any Box Relay traction as it comes out of internal beta?

Yes. So it's still pretty early in terms of how it's rolling out. I think we wanted to get it out of the gate a little bit earlier, but we have no kind of revenue associated with that. So there is no impact from a guidance standpoint, but we are certainly looking forward to accelerating the feedback that we see with customers. I would say, the excitement and interest in the product is pretty overwhelming. So it definitely represents a pretty clear direction that our customer base wants to see us going to. So as we are more and more the system of record for enterprise content within an enterprise, they really want to ensure that they can secure and manage and organize and govern as well as drive the workflows around that content. And we are really pleased to see the level of interest and excitement when we both announced the product as well as we are starting to expand into the beta program and we will certainly keep the market pretty clear on the updates from that as it continues to roll out broadly. But we will certainly share more on the next earnings call on that front.

Thanks Aaron. And then just given the recent announcement -- Yes.

If I can just add one more quick thought, just for helpful context also. I think what we have seen in the process of both building out Box Relay and talking with customers, there is really a dearth of modern workflow systems that deal with the range of content and use cases that we are solving for with Relay. So the vast majority of enterprise workflow technology around content, whether that's invoice processing, whether that's HR onboarding, whether that's contract review, really weighs in legacy systems that aren't looking for customers. So I think we will see this as a pretty significant market opportunity and kind of potential for more growth over time. So we are pretty excited about that.

Thanks Aaron. And then just given the recent announcements, middle of the month out of Microsoft on SharePoint at their summit and all of your recent announcements with Microsoft integration enhancements, where do we stand, I guess, in terms of the core functionality for Office 365 users that prioritize the Microsoft productivity suite?

Yes. So obviously Microsoft is a very significant partners of ours when you look at all the applications and user interfaces that either interact with content or deal with communicating around content with Microsoft Outlook or Microsoft Office. At the same time they do have some products that are marginally in some cases competitive with Box and in other cases more so. And I think, we have a fundamental different sort of view of how companies need to manage their information and content in the cloud or digital era. We think that enterprises need a single source of truth for their enterprise content, whereas I think other providers in this market are building more siloed solutions or fragmented solutions depending on the use case. So in the case of Microsoft, there is SharePoint, which is really for enterprise content management and team sites, there is Microsoft OneDrive, which is really for personal file sharing and file synchronization, there is Microsoft Teams, which is really for team collaboration. Each of these product serve a set of use cases in their own right. But when we work with customers, they are really looking for a single place to be able to secure, govern, manage, organize and work with their information and they want that content to be connected into the different applications that they are using. And I think importantly, they want that platform to be neutral so it can work across all the different applications and experiences that they are using. So obviously we see phenomenal adoption of Office 365. It's probably the single most adopted product alongside Box in our enterprise customers. At the same time, when you expand out the aperture of all the applications our customers are using, there is products from Slack, there is products from salesforce, there is now products from Facebook, obviously IBM, Amazon, Google and others. And so our job is to really be an open platform that connects to all the different applications and experiences our customers are using. And we have always found that the large enterprises that we are working with and certainly, even beyond that are looking for a neutral best-of-breed platform for cloud content management. And that's what has been driving the growth of the business and we are going to remain as competitive as we can in terms of just driving the innovation of our products and our platform while still making sure we have a great relationship and great set of partner integrations with Microsoft.

Great. Thank you Aaron.

The next question is from Brian Peterson from Raymond James.

Hi guys. Thanks for taking the question and congrats on the quarter. So I just wanted to hit on your channel partnership efforts where you really had a lot of success. As you think about the sales cycles for those broadly or those deals broadly, how are those compared to maybe six to 12 months ago and versus more expectations?

Yes. So we have seen a lot of consistency in terms of the sales cycles. I would say that a little bit of it depends on the nature of the deal. So for example, there are some cases, just to use IBM as an example where they might have an ELA that they are negotiating with a customer and then in the final months or stages of that negotiation, Box is brought in and told a critical need for the customer and those deals materialize fairly quickly. But otherwise I would say that both over time as well as relative to our direct sales efforts, we generally see a lot of consistency in terms of what those buying cycles look like. And in most cases, we are pretty involved in those sales cycle as well, whether it is an opportunity that's being generated by one of our resellers directly or generated by the Box team that then leverages the partner in some way to help get that deal across the finish line. We tend to stay pretty close both to our partners and to those prospects when closing those deals. So we see pretty traditional selling cycles whether that's an inside deal or in the field.

Got it. Thanks Dylan. And maybe one for me, just on the outperformance this quarter. Obviously there is a lot of factors, but any one or two things that you can call out specifically? And if I think about the $2 million to $3 million in upside this quarter, how should we think about that relaying to only a $2 million increase to the guidance for the fiscal year? Thanks guys.

Sure. So on the Q1 performance, I would say, driven by largely very strong growth just in a lot of those large deal outcomes. So our six-figure deals growing roughly 50%, booking 25 of those versus 17 a year ago, including a couple of $500,000 plus deals versus none a year ago. So those certainly helped. And especially those larger transactions, selling much more comprehensive set of solutions than we had in the past and that shows up in some of the newer product attach rates. I would also call out international growth as being a pretty strong contributor. So that's been above 20% of new bookings for the past several quarters now and was particularly strong in Q1 with a couple of our largest transactions coming internationally. And then finally seeing just overall rep productivity increases across-the-board. I mentioned bookings per rep going up by a little more than 10% year-on-year. So that combined with the rate at which we have been growing the sales force, although a lot of the reps that we have hired this most recent quarter aren't contributing a lot to the business. All of those factors were probably the biggest drivers of that outperformance. And then in terms of looking forward, just as a reminder, again as much we are very confident because the growth in that sales capacity as well as the record pipeline that we generated in the quarter, most of the pipeline as well as for one, we expect most those reps to really start contributing to the business are going to come later in the year. So one of as large of a revenue impact in FY 2018. So we feel pretty good about the guidance for the year and raising guidance to that $502 million to $506 million range. And certainly, if some of these factors that led the outperformance in Q1 continue, we feel pretty good about the growth prospects for the remainder of the year.

Understood. Thanks Dylan.

The next question is from Kash Rangan from Bank of America Merrill Lynch.

Hi. Thank you very much. Congratulations to the team here on the superb results. One question I had for you was, what is the play, in your opinion, to make this more of an enterprise wide play? And granted that you continue to score deals with large enterprises, one of the trends in this industry has been that the deployment sizes tend to be generally small whereas you look at a company like a Workday or whatnot, the wall-to-wall Workday human resource automation, what from your perspective does the company need to do or to educate the market that this can actually be an enterprisewide wall-to-wall type of proposition? And I was curious when I heard you talk about the usage-based approach to doing deals as opposed to user base. Do you think that's what it takes to make this more of an enterprisewide play going forward? Thank you so much and that's it for me.

Yes. Great. This is Aaron. Just one thing to clarify, on the usage based, as you know that was specific to our Platform pricing and so no change obviously to the core user base model for the core product which will continue to be a seat-based pricing model. But I just wanted to make sure to point out that clarification where the Platform pricing is really just to expand the number of use cases of people being able to buy API licenses on Box. On the enterprisewide point, it's a really great question. It's something that we certainly are trying to drive through the business. We have incredible examples, companies like General Electric and Coca-Cola and many others, where Box is really seen more as enterprisewide content management and collaboration platform within both the employee base as well as powering some of the more critical business processes. At the same time, we benefit from the fact that Box can be deployed, unlike some enterprisewide SaaS companies where we can be deployed for specific departments or groups within an organizations. And so on one hand, we have this huge benefit where a marketing team can start using Box and then overtime we can expand that to the entire customer base or the entire employee base or can start being used up by the sales team and then over time expand to the entire organization. I think the single biggest thing that describes the difference between environments that are just using us in some set of departments versus companywide is really our relationship and our strategic position within the sort of senior IT leadership of the organization all the way up to the CIO. And so where we have great CIO sponsorship and where we have great IT leadership sponsorship, we tend to see that they think of Box as really an enterprisewide solution and system of record. And in areas where we are working in more functional areas or within departments, we sometimes can remain there until we obviously broker that broader relationship. So it's something that we are training and more broadly deploying throughout our sales organization, our marketing and engagement efforts. But we have 74,000 customers. So that represents a pretty significant opportunity to go out and expand with those customers over time. But it is absolutely mission-critical that our entire customer base does start to see and deploy Box throughout their entire organization. But we see that as major upside within our business model right now.

Thanks Aaron.

The next question is from Aaron Rakers from Stifel.

Great. This is Joe Quatrochi, on for Aaron. My congrats on the quarter as well. Just a quick question. In terms of the hiring activity, I know you talked about a record level of sales adds this quarter, how do we think about the linearity throughout this fiscal year?

Yes. So I would think about it generally as being fairly linear. We do see and have seen over past years, some quarters being stronger than others, typically in Q1. Just as reps close up their year, there tends to be more movement in terms of reps coming onboard just based on the comp plans and all of those things. But don't see a huge difference between the other quarters. Typically slows a little bit in Q4 for that same reason as most companies being on either calendar fiscal year, January 31 fiscal year ends, a lot of the especially reps in the field will be working on some pretty large transactions later in the year. So they want to close those out. So while there is a little bit of seasonality in the early part and later part of the year, what we have seen in past years is that it doesn't have a huge impact on the seasonality. So we will continue to give progress in terms of how we are doing on the overall company headcount growth as well as AE heads and productivity and then we will break out the specifics and what we are seeing in the markets ad the end of the year.

Okay. That's helpful. And then just a quick follow for Aaron. Talk about the opportunity you see for KeySafe for government. I think you guys announced the SRG Level 4 recently. And just curious of the opportunity there?

Yes. So we are seeing actually pretty strong government traction that was really catalyzed by our initial FedRAMP certification the came last year and what we are seeing is over time there is more and more, both levels of classification that we can get to as well as additional security functionality. So in the example of KeySafe, that's really about letting our government clients manage their own encryption keys within Amazon's GovCloud facility, which is super important for highly sensitive content that goes through federal agencies. So we see a pretty significant opportunity within the federal government. The use cases are quite similar to what we see within the private sector. So a lot of collaboration between departments externally with different constituencies. A lot of need for obviously secure content management to protect pretty mission-critical data. So we see that as a pretty big opportunity across both civilian as well as defense agencies. But more broadly as we expand the aperture, this is just a part of our overall effort to make sure we are building the most secure and compliant cloud content management system. So as we look at industries like life sciences, healthcare, international data residency requirements as well as international governance, we are looking to build the broadest portfolio of both certification as well as compliance capabilities that allow any customer anywhere around the world to be able to will deploy Box. So very broadly we see regulated industries and companies or organizations of highly sensitive information requirements and security requirements as a massive opportunity for Box.

Great. Thank you.

The next question is from Brian White from Drexel.

Yes. Aaron, how is Box thinking about AI capabilities in your product portfolio? Is this something you can develop internally? Or are you going to need some acquisitions in this area?

Yes. We are incredibly excited about the opportunity for AI very broadly within the enterprise, but specifically, certainly within our context. If you think about how much information Box manages for our customers, all of the different workflows, all the different ways that content is interacted with, all the amount of information that's in Box, where customers today can't search or discover because it's unstructured data like images and videos and audio content, we see an unbelievable opportunity for AI to increase the productivity of our users and help provide insights around information that wasn't otherwise discoverable through manual processes or it just was so inefficient or cost prohibitive to do it without artificial intelligence. So I think throughout this year, you are going to see both product announcements as well as more direction from a roadmap standpoint that really brings intelligence into Box. I can't mention many of the specifics right now, but we think this is going to be fundamental to the future of our company and our product and the really exciting thing is that some of our biggest technology partners, companies like Google, Microsoft, IBM and others are some of the biggest providers and developers of this technology where we can plug certain capabilities into Box and provide a force multiplier for our customers leveraging some of those capabilities. So we are very, very excited about what this is going to mean for our products and for our customer base and we think it can truly transform the way that people and organizations are working with their information and working together and we expect to have some exciting updates throughout this year on this front.

And any takeaway here from the Facebook relationship and where you see this going? Can this be an important opportunity from a financial standpoint? Or just expands into another ecosystem?

Yes. I think core to our mission, we have to be everywhere where users are looking to access or share or work with their content or information. We can't be a cloud content management platform for customers if their data is in lots of different silos and not able to be secured and governed within Box for all of the different applications that they are working with. So just the fundamental premise of our entire company is that we need to integrate with the different applications that our customers are using. So with that said, I think Facebook does represent a new set of use cases that enterprises didn't necessarily have before with modern sort of cloud-based experiences, in this case communication and social networking within the enterprise in a very broad consumer oriented way. So we are excited to be one of the leading options for managing content within that Facebook experience. I don't think that we would ascribe a specific financial measurement to that as much as ensuring that any customer that's using Facebook Workplace is choosing to use Box as their cloud content management platform that's embedded into Facebook. So that's really how we think about that just as we do with any of our other partners that we are working with.

Great. Thank you.

There are no further questions at this time. I will turn the call back over to Stephanie Wakefield for closing remarks.

Thank you for joining us today. We look forward to speaking with you working again next quarter. And if you have any questions in the meantime, please feel free to contact us here in Investor Relations. We are happy to help. Thank you.

This concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect.