Welcome to the Green Plains Inc. and Green Plains Partners Fourth Quarter 2016 results conference call. Today's event is being recorded. I'll turn the conference over to Jim Stark, please go ahead sir.

Thank you. Welcome to the Green Plains Inc. and Green Plains Partners fourth quarter and year-end 2016 earnings call. Participants on today's call are Todd Becker, President and Chief Executive Officer, Jerry Peters, our Chief Financial Officer, Jeff Briggs, our Chief Operating Officer; Steve Bleyl, Executive Vice President of Ethanol Marketing and Ken Simril, President and CEO of Fleischmann's Vinegar Company. There is a slide presentation for you to follow along. You can find this presentation on the investor page under the Events and Presentations link on both corporate websites. During this call, we will be making forward-looking statements which are predictions, projections and other statements about future events. These statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results could materially differ because of factors discussed in yesterday's earnings press releases and the comments made during this conference call and in the risk factors section of our Form 10-K, Form 10-Q and other reports and filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. You may also refer to Page 2 of the website presentations for information about factors that could cause different outcomes. We do not undertake any duty to update any forward-looking statement. Now, I would like to turn the call over to Todd Becker.

Thanks Jim and good morning everyone and thank you for joining our call today. We reported net income of $18.7 million or $0.47 a share for the fourth quarter. EBITDA was $83.5 million for the quarter and for 2016 we reported $174.4 million of EBITDA, the second best year in the last eight years of profitable performance. Our results for the fourth quarter were driven across the board by solid performances in all of the segments. As you can see, small moves in the consolidated crush margin can yield big results for the bottom line. This is the due to the law of large numbers which we have discussed in the past as we start to achieve scale throughout the supply chain. The consolidated crush margin which is operating income before depreciation, amortization from the ethanol production segment including corn oil plus intercompany fees such as Green Plains Partners storage and transportation fees was $81.6 million or $0.24 per gallon for the quarter. Interestingly, both acquisitions we added in the fourth quarter were immediately accretive and it helped with the strong results we reported. As you can see we moved around reporting segments to better reflect our long term strategic objectives and for ease of reporting consistency. Jerry will cover more specifically how this is structured and the results per segment. WE produced a company record $334.2 million gallons of ethanol and to put this in perspective that is more than the yearly production capability on October 16, 2008, the first day post-merger after forming the new modern-day Green Plains. We also produced 894,000 tons of distillers grains and 77.4 million pounds of corn oil while processing over 3.3 million tons of corn. Our yield was 2.86 gallons of ethanol per bushel of corn for the quarter. All 17 of…

Thanks Todd, good morning everyone. For Green Plains Inc. consolidated revenues were $932 million in the fourth quarter which was up $192 million or about 26% from a year ago. This was driven by the acquisitions of the three ethanol plants as well as Fleischmann's Vinegar Company. Volumes of ethanol sold for the quarter were up over 30% to 379 million gallons while higher average realized price per gallon contributed to the revenue increases as well. Our utilization rate for our ethanol production assets was approximately 90% for the fourth quarter of 2016 which brought the average utilization for the year up to about 89%. Our consolidated operating income for the quarter was $56.1 million versus $12.7 million a year ago. This $43 million improvement is primarily due to a strong ethanol crush, increased ethanol production volumes from our acquisitions and the addition of Fleischmann's Vinegar. EBITDA or earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization was up significantly over last year's fourth quarter at $83.5 million for the 2016 quarter compared to $32.5 million for 2015. With the acquisition of Fleischmann's Vinegar in the fourth quarter, we reevaluated our segment reporting to provide additional clarity on our overall strategy and simplify how we report our results. The partnership segment remains unchanged which reflects the results for Green Plains Partners. Partnership segment reported a record $17.9 million of operating income. The ethanol production segment now includes the third party costs of grain consumed and third party revenues from product sales reported directly within this segment. In the past we reflected this as intercompany activity with the agribusiness and marketing segments. So our ethanol production segment now seamlessly reflects the full supply chain without large intercompany eliminations. Plan origination fees, product sales commissions and throughput fees through Green Plains Partners are…

Thanks Jerry and just to continue on that theme I'll just touch briefly on the new administration and the overdone speculation surrounding it. Our belief is that President Trump remains highly supportive of our industry. We have heard that from a number of sources including our elected officials and from administrative appointees. The freeze that was issued on upcoming regulations that were to go into effect tomorrow February 10, in our view was a routine move that each administration has done when there is a new one in place. Unfortunately the 2017 RVO is caught up in the freeze but we believe that will go into effect March 21 or sooner under the leadership of the new EPA administrator. While there are a select few pushing for a change in the point of obligation for the renewable fuel standard, I find it hard to believe that that is top priority for the administration and that all of the other obligated parties would agree with the change. In fact, the coalition to keep it unchanged is a cross-section of players that we have never seen together before from retailers to integrated energy companies and refiners to railroads and truckers, the API and the ethanol industry. So even a small trucker who buys above the rack would be an obligated party which would just be an absolute nightmare. Finally, hundreds of millions of dollars are being spent on building out E15 infrastructure and we cannot stall the momentum we're getting from expanded blends in the marketplace. Now we'll talk a little bit more about the business. So current ethanol margins, while not as good as they were in the fourth quarter of 2016, are better than the margins we experienced in the first quarter of 2015 and have trended up from the…

[Operator Instructions]. We'll go first to Adam Samuelson of Goldman Sachs.

Todd, maybe first on the first quarter as it's tracked and the production rates in the industry and you alluded to shutdowns or maintenance slowdowns in march but has the pace of industry production year-to-date surprised you? Has there been better operating capabilities in some of the smaller facilities than you might have expected and/or capacity creep up 7%, 8% year-over-year through the first four or five weeks? It's a big year-on-year increase.

Yeah, it is. I mean, I think we're a little surprised when we saw numbers like 1060 a few weeks ago. We're starting to see those temper back down. I think the industry is, you know, hit the peak and it's starting to slow back down a little bit based on the fact that we're just producing a little bit too much versus the overall demand at this part of the year. So I think that while we said last year we will produce over a million barrels a day I think we should be prepared for that. That didn't surprise us, I mean, we're a little bit surprised that we can get up to a million-sixty a day but I also don't think that's sustainable for 365 days a year, as I said. We're at the peak of the ability to push as hard as we can because of the cold weather and - but I think also when you look at that number, I still go back to that 21-days of demand versus the last year of 26 days of demand and margins were much worse last year while we have much higher run rates this year than last year. So, I mean, the market is taking it, I think export demand is strong. I think we need some of these gallons, we're building that as fast as we were and we're going to come out into the driving season I think in a little bit tighter situation than we were last year which I think bodes well. So overall, yeah, a bit surprised that can get up that high so fast but I think we're starting to see that tempered a bit as producers are realizing that that's probably not the best way to be at this point.

That's helpful and then maybe going back to the export commentary where you talked over - another year of over a billion gallons for 2017. Growth with China presumably out of the market for all intents and purposes, so kind of the non-kind of piece of exports would be [indiscernible] 300 million gallons year-over-year. Any color on the areas for growth or countries that might be taking a bigger part of that increment?

Yes, our view in 2017 is Canada and Brazil lead the way and I think Brazil is showing that certainly in the last couple of months but I do believe that it will continue on throughout the year. They're not intended to make sugar down there or to make ethanol down there, it's fully intended to make sugar. That market continues to firm up as the corn market continues to sit here and so our view is that Canada leads the way with better volumes than they took last year. Maybe China takes a little bit of stuff just for industrial and then Brazil after that and then we get India, Philippines, etc. So our number right now on paper exceeds, when we add all of that up together, exceeds 1.1 billion and we could see at a discount to gasoline even growth from there. I think that's a pretty good - but Brazil is a key part of that. You know, we have Brazil in excess of 300 million gallons of imports this year and I think that's a reasonable number based on everything that we're seeing and that number could actually go higher potentially.

We'll go next to Ed Westlake of Credit Suisse.

Yes, congrats Todd on everything you achieved last year. Just a quick question on DGG's and we don't see - I think the stock got hit a little bit on that Chinese stories but you seem to be more relaxed so maybe just a little bit extra color there.

Yes, so once the story came out the market had already been adjusted in price and I think that was the key. I think that was basically a - the market was already basically came down into the 80% to 85% range, the price of corn after the Chinese earlier in the year, long before that story came out had started to slowdown anyway. And so we were already making adjustments. What we're seeing is the - in addition to that we got the double whammy of Vietnam had to do a slowdown as well because of fumigation issues that they needed to work through. We're starting to see them reengaged at least on a discussion standpoint in country on reengaging with the U.S. If we do that we're hopeful that that will bring back some export demand out of the U.S. but overall we've settled down here in the 75% to 80% to price of corn. And once that's in the model then that's a given and now you have to work around all of the factors and so we're starting to see better inclusion rates at some of our integrated feeders in the U.S. that we do business with because of the value of the protein and the things that we've seen in [indiscernible] around the world and just the sensational demand for protein. So, there is a point where distillers just stop going down and I think we've reached that point right now and I think that at least we know that that's a stable factor in our crush margin; it really has more upside than downside from here.

And then you're a keen observer of the corn markets, you know, we filled storage a lot because we had bumper crop, we can't predict what the growing season is going to look like, that's very much weather related, but if you think about a normal season or a weak season or a bumper season maybe just some observations as to what we'll do with the corn if we again have another good year.

Yes, I think that's a great question and so I'll start real quick, you know, the market is expecting around 90 million acres this year but if you take a look at the profitability of the farmer in the seven or eight best producing states in the U.S. it actually is profitable to produce corn again. And so our view is that that will be on the low end of the acreage, final acreage that we see this year and we're starting to do internal surveys with those 8800 customers across our supply chain. And what we're seeing anecdotally is that we don't believe that it will be as extreme at this point based on what we're seeing is that we don't believe that the drop will be as extreme as the market sees in acres but even if it drops to those levels it's in areas that corn is not always the best thing to plant but in the strong corn planting areas you might have 90 million better acres than 93 million total acres in your production, you know, if you go above trend, could really be interesting. So our view is that in a normal growing season that's all we can bet on between 90 and 93 million acres of planting at a trend yield, carryout gets bigger again in the United States and there won't be a lot more ethanol demand for that and we lose - I think the key point is that if you've seen the estimates come out of South America on South America crops with the corn crop getting bigger again in South America based on some estimates that came out even today, we will - the last time that happened we just lost all our export share on corn by the United States in the summer and then what are we going to do in that situation as well. So, if we get that 90 to 93 million acres at trend-line yields and we see a drop-off in export corn demand, there is nothing else to take that corn at this point which we believe is favorable over the long term for our business.

Well after those two lead-ins I have to ask what you're going to do with the dividend?

Yeah, you know look we're assessing that. I mean, you saw that we allocated a lot of capital in growth last year. You know, we're always looking for opportunities but I would say that if we can generate - if we see a strong margin here overall we will evaluate all of the different things that we do to allocate capital and dividend is one of those and I think you see in the MLP we're not afraid to raise the dividend and we would not be afraid to raise the dividend in Green Plains Inc. as well if that's the best use for capital.

We'll go next to Farha Aslam of Stevens.

Could you update us on the Jefferson Terminal and have you made a decision whether you're going to go with the Part 2 and double the capacity of the Jefferson Terminal?

Yes, so we'd like to get done with Part 1 first so we're going to - we think the first tanks will come on in July, ready for the last half strength in the export season. We're in open season right now with talking to no less than 20 to 25 potential customers of the terminal on long term throughput agreements. We've got a lot of demand for that terminal and it's evidenced by the fact that even in the last couple of - even in the last 30 days when the fog rolled into the Gulf, Beaumont, where we would have our terminal, never shut down and would have no delays and while the Gulf has boats stacked up in the other export terminals for ethanol. So, I think that was a good exercise for people to see as we're going through open season. You know, we will evaluate, we want to get done with Phase 1 first but we're already evaluating Phase 2 not just for ethanol but for other agricultural products that we export like corn oil through that terminal as well as distillers grains through that terminal. So overall we're still on track on all of our assumptions that we thought about when we did this project and at this point we're not going to make a decision on Phase 2 yet.

And could you remind us how much EBITDA that should add to, that Part 1 will, to DPRE roughly?

Go ahead Jerry, I don't know if we put that specific number up but I think it's between $5 million and $10 million.

Yeah, I don't think we published a specific number for EBITDA but it's a $55 million terminal and, you know, the EBITDA multiple on that is in the $5 million to $6 million range.

That's helpful. And then just as a follow-up on the core ethanol business, can you share with us more color on E15, kind of how much you expect, how many gallons E15 to absorb and kind of where that market stands and what's the underlying strength with the uncertainty in the point of obligation?

So I'll let Steve comment on E15 and the whole program and the rollout because I think there's some interesting color around that about the expansion and the stations and the capital spend that's been taking place. I'll come back to point of obligation once he's done.

I started to see more stations switch over. We have another new one coming through in an RFG market. We anticipate this year to add right around the 200 million gallon incremental due to E15 stations. The growth conference right now I was listening to earlier they were talking about there's a little over 600 stations with E15 and that's where it's still going but there are more people continuing to come forward to the Prime the Pump fund and see if there's still money available for switching over.

I think when Steve talks about one more switching he means one more chain with lots of stores.

Right.

So it's not one more gas station switching so I think that's important and overall we expect to have a thousand stations by the end of 2017, right? So I think we're starting to get penetration but what we're seeing Farha is that even people that weren't - even companies that weren't in Prime the Pump, it's having a competitive impact on them when somebody across the street has added E15 and now we're seeing change that said they would not do it coming to Prime the Pump as well as other programs to try and figure out how do we get E15 into our gas station as well? So, in our view we're starting to get - we spent the money to get the first phase done as an industry and as the U.S.DA and the second phase we think will happen more naturally from a competitive standpoint. In terms of point of obligation as I mentioned in our call, there's certainly a lot of consternation and arguments going on around that. You know, our view is that we have put together a coalition of parties that have never been in a coalition before because they understand, we all understand together, the importance of keeping the point of obligation right where it's at and while there certainly are a couple of companies that are looking to move that, that's not the majority and we believe that we will be able to maintain that point of obligation for now. Obviously it's going to be a point of negotiation continuing on because we don't believe that the few companies that are fighting hard to move it will give up and we're just going to have to defend it and prove our point and make sure that the coalition that we put together puts all of the arguments forward and we believe that it will be heard and we will continue to fight to keep it right where it's at.

We'll go next to Brett Wong of Piper Jaffray.

Excellent, thanks for taking my questions. Todd, you mentioned you're buying spot but with the improved margins recently and uncertainty that that's going to persist here in the near term, are you guys locking in any more of these higher margins?

Well, higher margins is relative, it's not high enough for us to say let's go and lock away a bunch of margins like it was in late December where we were pushing into the mid to high teens on the margin structure and we tried to get, quite frankly, as much done as we could at the time but then the market just moved so fast after that first stocks report that it went away from us. So, at this point, no, I think Brett the key is, is that we have 38 million gallons of storage at our platform and we're storing every gallon that we can and earning the return on our space which held 38 million gallons off the market. If you multiple that by a lot more plants across the industry, then you're going to - then there's a lot of gallons that the market is incenting us not to ship; that's being felt. The second thing that's being felt is when you start exporting 100 million gallons a month, that's being felt and the tightness of that. And so our view is that we will continue to be aggressive on pricing export gallons to go offshore as you see with our February program at 25% and carry as much as we can when the market incents in and we're starting to see that have an impact on the margin structure. I don't think the end user quite feels as comfortable as they have 30 days ago when they started to see stocks build as we come to the end of the storage season and into summer driving. And then the last thing is I just can't - again, I'm going to reiterate this as much as I can, we have 21 days of stocks to total usage at this point versus last year at 26 days of stocks to total usage. We're tighter than we were at this time last year with higher stock numbers or as high of stock numbers in total. So, it's a totally different market when demand grows, you know, stocks need to grow along with demand but we're definitely in a tighter situation, I think the market is starting to feel it.

Excellent Todd, thanks for that color, very helpful. And then just on your comments that you made about continuing to build your capacity out in the ethanol business just wondering if you could talk about the potential assets out there that you see and your willingness to potentially pay up compared to what you previously paid for acquisitions given some quality assets that you might see out there because I know those are coming fewer and far between of getting.

Yes, I think the market came off of a strong fourth quarter and whenever that happens acquisitions become a bit harder to make. But I also feel like the industry is in some of the best financial shape that they've ever been in, you know, so a lot of times when you call for the demise of ethanol in one down quarter they're missing the fact that we had a pretty good 2016, an okay 2015 and a great 2014. So, industries in great financial shape. I think exits come from players that paid down debt and still can earn a return against the current values and I believe that we'll still have the ability to continue to look at assets. I think our advantages are MLP with our ability to use their cheaper cost of capital to help us acquire these assets when needed but at this point I wouldn't say it's a robust pipeline of ethanol plants but there are definitely people still shopping around looking to potentially do deals with Green Plains and, again, as I say - as I often said in the past, this will probably be the last plant that we buy for a while and then we end up buying two more so I don't know what will happen in 2017, you know, I would imagine that we'll have some opportunities. Again, we don't want to - there's a point where we just say that we'll just wait and be more patient but at this point I don't have anything to report in terms of any active deals happening.

We'll go next to Laurence Alexander of Jeffries.

This is Dan Rizzo on for Laurence. Just - how are you doing? Just in terms of the vinegar market, do you guys - do you ever breakout what your market share is there?

No and you probably won't see that. It's not a huge market globally but we're a big enough player in that market that it will be hard to get data out of us on volumes and total capacity mainly because they're so sensitive relative to other competitors out there that we can give you broad guidance on where we're and what we're doing and some of the things that we're doing and you'll see some of that guidance through this new segment that we have but in general I don't think that you'll get very much other data out of us in the vinegar segment.

Could you tell me what's driving the strength in the Fleischmann's Vinegar market or business and the cattle feed lot? What's driving - you said that Fleischmann's Vinegar is showing signs of strength I'm just wondering if -

Oh, okay, yeah. Yeah, so - and the feed we were able to lock margins away in the feed lot operations in our cattle feeding business well above hotel margins and that's what drove the business profitability and it was nothing more than every day we buy cattle and hedge cattle and earn a margin. There was no real risk around doing that and the good thing for our business is that when it's not profitable to feed cattle, back around the other end that we're obligated to. So from our perspective we managed that business very opportunistically and we've been able to do that very well. I'll let Ken just speak to some of the broader opportunities in vinegar and where some of the growth came overall for him but again we'll keep it at a high level as it's a highly competitive market - it's a competitive market from a standpoint of not very many players and we just can't give too much information on all of those things they've been looking for.

Yes so as it relates to our vinegar business we've seen continued growth in our condiments, sauces and dressings business and what's actually driving that growth within that group, our specialty products group has done extremely well. We have antimicrobials that are in that space and that market continues to grow I think up for the quarter, we were up about 9%. Non-GMO was up about 18% and organic was up about 11% and those are the products that are really kind of accelerating our growth outside of our normal 2% to 3% growth rates that we've talked about on previous calls. And I think, you know, we're on trend, if you will, with all of the health and wellness, our products that are in the marketplace and then antimicrobials, that's a market that's really growing. Our growth rates today are about 50%, ten-year CAGR 50% and that's finding application in the meat and poultry segments for lunchmeats and ready-to-eat meats. And so that's what's really kind of driving our business on an accelerated basis in terms of our traditional kind of growth rates, again, in our condiments, sauces and dressings.

We'll go next to Heather Jones of the Vertical Group.

On the - you mentioned the ten-days of storage, so should we anticipate that your gallons sold in Q1 will be meaningfully lower than it would have been otherwise? I mean, how should we be thinking about that?

You know the carry kind of - is starting to come out of the market because the market is getting tight again so we'll just make the decision on what we ship versus what we store by the end of Q1 but at this point I wouldn't change any of your estimates as the market is starting to tell us that they need those gallons out. So, we'll see what happens by the end of the quarter.

Okay. And then on your supply outlook, it implies call it 2% to 3% year-on-year growth which clearly year-to-date we've been up well north of that. So when you came up with that estimate, are you assuming that the industry will pull back some out of rationality or do you think that a lot of the increase that we're seeing now is the result of creep that came on maybe mid last year and so we'll lap it and then along with downtime so just help us to frame your outlook, guidance in light of what we've seen year-to-date?

Yes, so we're not in any downtime at all really across the industry. We're running full out and that's keeping us about a million-fifty a day. Our view at 15.7 billion gallons is about a million twenty-five a day over the whole year and that takes into consideration 10 to 15 days of total downtime at a million-thirty a day. So, you know, overall when we look at that we just say what's reasonable? You know, typically what we see is a 2% to 3% drop during the second quarter from the first quarter on production levels is what we've seen in the past and so if you're at a million-fifty maybe you go down to a million twenty-five and then we see what the summer brings but you've got to also remember a very strong export program during the summer, during the heat, when we make less gallons anyways because of the gallons that, the type of gallons we produce, also has a bearing on how much you produce in the U.S. as well. So our view is kind of the 15, 3 to 15, 7 type number and that comes from about a million twenty-five a day roughly over the whole 365 days on average. I don't know if we're capable of doing that either, we'll have to wait and see.

Okay and then on the demand front, so export demand has clearly been strong but year-to-date it's not just domestically for ethanol but just gas demand has been weaker than definitely I had anticipated and just wondering if you could give us some thoughts on what do you think is driving the sluggishness and I'm not thinking about like in the seasonal downturn, I'm thinking year-on-year. So if you could give us some color on that?

I think there's a view on a couple of different points there and I'll let Steve expand on it but I mean, exports also need to be taken or imports, into consideration and exports as well in these numbers. And then when we look at it, you know, yeah, we're definitely watching that very closely. We did see high inclusion rates last week in the last data numbers for ethanol which would imply gas demand has started to creep back up and then we'll see where that - we'll see where we end - next week. We also saw a tightness in EIA this week as well with gasoline stocks drawing. So Steve, do you want to talk a little bit more about that?

Well, I think they probably missed some of the exports going offshore, the gasoline exports potentially.

Yes.

So that was part of it. But we've seen it and we've questioned whether some of it is West Coast weather is effecting it with some of the trouble they've had out there and so we definitely are looking at it but we still are sitting at about a 1, 1.1 growth rate for the year.

Okay, so I was wondering whether too but I mean some areas have been unseasonably warm. So there's no reason for us to think - I mean, it just doesn't intuitively make sense that demand would have just slowed down so dramatically over the course of one month. So you're not seeing anything that would make you think that?

No, we're not.

We'll go next to Craig Irwin of ROTH Capital Partners.

Yes, good morning thank you for taking my questions. So Todd, this has been sort of touched but I wanted to ask if we could maybe get a little bit more clarity here. So, some of the ethanol market participants, the other producers we talked to out there, have said that they're hearing that Green Plains has slowed down production at a few different facilities within the last couple of weeks. Is this just an overly sensitive market maybe picking up on Green Plains moving over to a heavier mix of export spec ethanol sort of as we exit January coming into February or did you have any discretionary slowdowns during the quarter?

Well we heard that about all of the guys you asked, they slowed down too. So, anyways, so a couple of things. I think one thing we did across our platform is took the corn basis down $0.10 across the whole United States and how people view that, they can view it any way they want but we have no problem buying and because of our farmer program we have no problem buying corn at our facilities at this point and have more than enough coming at us every single day than we need and all of our storage is full. So I think when you do that people initially think that you've taken your production down. You know, have we reduced slightly? Yeah, we definitely have looked at it where in certain areas of our bottom tier plans, it made sense to slow a little bit down and you could - and the market is assuming correctly that we've done a little bit of that, nothing materially but enough to we believe that between slowdown and using our own storage to keep barrels off the market and exporting that Green Plains is part of the impact on some of the stock or some of the build in margins. But we also have heard that across the board that others have done a lot of the same things. Didn't see it in the numbers this week as we only were down 10,000 barrels a day, so we'll just have to wait and see if and when this kind of comes through the numbers if others have done the same. So, we're not announcing any numbers for anything that we've done but marginally have slowed some of our bottom tiered plans.

My next question was about the hedging position for the first quarter. So you mentioned 100 million gallons mid-teens position more or less on margins. Can you maybe share with us whether this was something more towards the front of the quarter or evenly distributed throughout the quarter so we can maybe parse what the spot exposure is to January/February?

Yes, it was heavily weighted towards the first month of the quarter as we saw that was the best, highest point, on the curve forward. So we can't - we're not going to give you an exact percentage on that but you could assume it was heavily weighted towards January.

And then my last question, the food product, M&A outlooks, so you wouldn't have bought Fleischmann unless you wanted to get bigger in a high margin staple business. Can you share with us the resources that you're putting on identifying and evaluating targets maybe whether or not you have active conversations with potential targets at this time and what you think about the potential for acquisitions in this area over the course of 2017?

We have an active M&A process across our whole platform. I would say that one of the definite places where we wanted to allocate capital in the future is in the food ingredient segment under Ken's leadership and we have Tier 1 and Tier - we kind of basically break it down into kind of Tier 1 and Tier 2 opportunities. We do have several Tier 1 opportunities which are everything ranging from a small tuck-in acquisition to a larger platform acquisition and we look at everything between those. So I would say we're actively seeking to build off of the Fleischmann's platform and actively seeking to expand into food ingredient businesses much like Fleischmann's that have similar characteristics; either something that we produce or something we use or an adjacency to something that we can do or even completely something different if it's unique enough for us to say it makes sense to do that. But, our focus is on things around adjacencies to what we do today and where we can leverage the capabilities of the Fleischmann's platform as well in terms of distribution, customer management, sales and research etc. So, stay tuned. I mean, I think that we're at multiple different stages with potential acquisitions as some - as we always say, we don't know when one will hit but we're actively engaged in many opportunities.

[Operator Instructions]. We'll go next to Pavel Molchanov of Raymond James.

The fact that REN pricing has obviously fallen off a cliff without any policy changes actually having been announced, do you think that once there is clarity on kind of the EPA's intentions, there's a likelihood that we'll see a bounce back in REN's or do you think there's more downside?

You know, our view was even based on the market that we were in that REN's at a dollar were too high just based on market fundamentals and so I don't think REN's falling from a $1.00 to $0.50 can give you any view of what would happen if we go back to - I'll get clarity on point of obligation and EPA and RVO's and those type of things. So, our view is that any of these price levels some of it is fundamentally driven and some of it is market driven in terms of different players coming in and coming out at different times and some of it is timing driven. So, when you look at the RVO for 2017 which we believe will hold at 15 billion gallons and a domestic market that should take 14.6 billion gallons we're going to need to use some of the excess REN's this year which could provide volatility throughout the year and - but I think what we've seen here is a pullback from a market that we felt fundamentally was too high in the first place. Steve, do you have any other comments on that?

No, it's perfect.

Okay.

Okay and just a quick one about kind of your own M&A thinking and I appreciate that you're not guiding to any specific acquisitions, [indiscernible] last year was unique in that you were able to buy a package of assets rather than one-off plans. Given that [indiscernible] doesn't seem to be interested in selling their dry mills anymore do you think that package deals are going to be realistic going forward or is it going to be going back to one-offs?

I still think it's a combination of both potentially down the road. I mean, there are definitely players that own multiple plants and there's players that own single plants. You know, we don't view one as better than the other, we can close a single plant as fast as we can close three plants and it doesn't - we're well set up to do that and integrate very quickly. So, our view is we want to do the best thing that we can for our shareholders and if that means buy three at a time or one at a time, we're okay and heading in that direction. So, as I said, we're approaching scale but we still want to continue to expand mainly driven as well by the MLP advantage that we have and we think that it's great for the MPL unit holders that we have this view and we've achieved our growth targets for the MPL and exceeded them both on growth and yield and so we think we've definitely been highly focused on growth for the MLP both in ethanol production and additional downstream assets that may not be within our value chain today as well. We're highly focused on M&A in the MPL centric space as well on more and more terminal assets that fit well with our distribution.

We'll go next to Patrick Wang of Baird.

Todd, just going back to the hedging program really quick, in the past we've talked about the increasingly complexity of hedging and associated value at risk as the company continues to grow. Can you just talk a little bit about - do you have any sort of target hedge percentage that you'd like to hit entering the quarter or is the program just purely opportunistic in nature?

Yes, it's funny to think about that because when we would hedge 100 million gallons eight years ago that was a third of our year and today it's a third of a month, so a month. So, obviously it's changed a lot, the complexity has - actually the complexity is not any different it's just as easy to hedge today as it was back then. It's different because you do have - you're hedging mainly in financial instruments then just hedging full off in physical sales but overall we watch it very carefully. I mean, we can't - we probably can't hedge a third of our production right now and feel very confident that the balance sheet could handle it because any kind of blowout in margin structure, you start having $50 million days, while it's right way risk, for the rest of the year you don't want to start making margin calls like that. So we're very - we've put a lot of analysis behind it. One-hundred million gallons we could do more than that, but we would probably start to limit it at a quarter, 250 million gallons or less, somewhere in that range on a forward-look if we had to do it from a balance sheet perspective.

That makes sense and then related to that, can you help us size up generally how much you had hedged entering the first quarter? Meaning, what - completed in 4Q for first Q?

Well the first - you mean coming into the first quarter that we're in right now?

Yes.

We had a hundred million gallons hedged which is about - a little less than a third of our production for the quarter so we basically were able to get that off. We wanted to continue on from there and the market just started to break away once we started to build stocks during January.

We'll go next to Ethan Bellamy of Baird.

Hey Todd, what's a reasonable modeling expectation for the timing and size of dropping the Jefferson Terminal into the MPL?

Yes, so what we want to do is get through open season and get some contracts in place. Once we do that it's our obligation through the agreements in place to offer that to the MLP. I think we would potentially - if we can get enough contracts in place and have enough scale which we believe is a high probability, we would offer it to the MLP shortly after startup or a little bit before startup, wouldn't we Jerry?

Yes, absolutely. Yep. Yeah and I think in terms of -

Say fourth quarter?

Possibly as early as third quarter. Third to fourth quarter. And I think in terms of value, I mean, you can look at other terminal businesses and see EBITDA multiples in the market on those and kind of back into a reasonable dropdown value.

We'll go next to Selman Akyol of Stifel.

So couple of questions, so first of all in terms of just thinking about the terminal, would you then - as it gets dropped in, would Phase 2 be on the MLP to build out or would you still retain that up top and then drop it in as Phase 2 cap build out?

Yes, I think the terminal - the JV itself would be dropped down into the MLP so that the future build out would be done by the MLP. It depends entirely on the status of the commercial arrangements, you know, who's supporting expanding that terminal for other products and what kind of contracts we'd have in place. I think -

Understood.

The parent company would certainly be helpful in that regard to make sure that we had the right level of commercial support to build out the terminal.

Got it. And then going back to - you made some comments about acquisitions terminals for the MLP and I'm wondering, would you be looking at freestanding terminals then, not in conjunction with your production facilities or is there any more color you could shed?

Yes, we've always said, you know, it's a multi-strategy M&A plan for the MLP as well. It starts with the base business of our ethanol production that goes through the tanks that the MLP owns which generates - is generating quite a bit of stable income. From there we look at - we looked at the terminals that Glenstar owned which were basically well supported by Green Plains Distribution but beyond that we've also said that we will also look at freestanding terminals outside of our normal platform but things that we believe we can add value to. So, if there's a terminal somewhere in the northeast that is interesting for us and we could ship gallons through there and move our - you know, when you've got a lot, we've got a billion and a half production moving around the United States of gallons that we believe we can have significant impact to acquisitions that we would make downstream even though it could be a multi-product terminal and ethanol is only a piece of it, we believe we can enhance profitability even further by moving our own supply through there when we're paying others to handle it for us today. So yes, that is absolutely part of our strategy and the go-forward.

And then my last question, in terms of the 38 million gallons you reference you're holding, how should I be thinking about that in terms of throughput for the MLP in terms of the first quarter?

Look as I said, we haven't really made a decision on what will happen with those gallons yet but really just depending on - and don't forget we're producing at maximum levels and we're not anywhere close to the Mbc's and we're doing all good from that perspective, we just have to wait until the market structure is - the market structure, it happens so fast when just even recently it went to a full carry structure where it was incenting us to hold it and now the front-end has already gone into flat and even inverted in the cash market. So, it happens very fast, I can't anticipate what will hold at the end of the quarter but we always hold some gallons anyways. I mean, our average hold at the end of every quarter is somewhere between 15 and 20 million ethanol gallons anyways. So what we've done is we've just topped that up at least in the short term but by the end of the quarter we might get back to our normal hold, it just depends on what the market is telling us. So you didn't see a lot of those gallons anyways.

Just very much from a conceptual standpoint, we don't recognize the revenue on that until we actually deliver the product out of the terminals. So, if we did have something that gapped over the quarter, you might see a slight change in volume throughput but as Todd said, we don't really expect that to bridge over the quarter end.

I'll turn the conference back to Mr. Becker for any additional remarks.

Yes, thanks. Thanks for everybody coming on the call, obviously a strong finish for 2016, a bit of a choppy start in 2017 but we still believe overall 2017 is still shaping up much like we've talked about in the past from a supply and demand perspective, we've got work to do in the first quarter as margins are chopping around but as we said, still better than this time last year so with that and strong demand and a stock situation that needs to be looked at from how tight it is in the market, we think there's great opportunities going forward for the company and both from a growth distribution and across our platform perspective; so we appreciate everybody on the call and we'll talk to you next quarter, thanks.