Welcome to the Brixmor Property Group Inc. Second Quarter 2017 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions]. Please note, this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Ms. Stacy Slater. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Operator. And thank you, all, for joining Brixmor's second quarter conference call. With me on the call today are Jim Taylor, Chief Executive Officer and President; and Steve Gallagher, Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer; as well as Mark Horgan, Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer; and Brian Finnegan, Executive Vice President, Leasing, who will be available for Q&A. Angela Aman, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer is on maternity leave and will return for our third quarter call. Before we begin, let me remind everyone that some of our comments today may contain forward-looking statements that are based on certain assumptions and are subject to inherent risks and uncertainties as described in our SEC filings and actual future results may differ materially. We assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements. Also, we will refer today to certain non-GAAP financial measures. Further information regarding our use of these measures and reconciliations of these measures to our GAAP results are available in the earnings release and supplemental disclosure on the Investor Relations portion of our website. [Operator Instructions]. At this time, it's my pleasure to turn the call over to our CEO, Jim Taylor.

Thank you, Stacy. Good morning, everyone and thank you for joining our call. I'm incredibly pleased with and grateful to the Brixmor team for yet another strong quarter of outperformance as we execute on our long term plan. There are a few points I'd like to highlight prior to turning the call over to Steve Gallagher for a more detailed discussion of our results and then to you for your questions. First, we and others continue to demonstrate the disruption in the retail environment can actually be beneficial. We tip our hats to the recently reported strong results of our good friends at Kimco, Weingard and Kite which underscore the broader truth that demand to be in well-located open-air centers remained strong. In fact, this quarter's analysis by our national accounts team of over 150 tenants across open-air segment such as grocery, off-price, fitness, entertainment, home goods, restaurant, health and beauty and others indicated plans to open up over 12,500 new stores in the next 12 months. And importantly, that count does not include the thousands of new openings planned for regional and local tenants. My point here is simply is that amidst this ongoing creative disruption in the retail generally, the open-air segment is thriving as an accessible, convenient and cost-effective alternative for retailers who require a physical presence to acquire and serve their customers. Now having tipped our hats to the strong performance of our peers in the open-air segment, I must point out that our leasing productivity and cash flow overgrowth truly stand apart. I continue to believe we're best positioned amongst our peers for strong growth given the locations of our centers, our people and improved platform and our attractive rent basis during a period in which retailers are increasingly focused on store profitability and occupancy…

Thanks, Jim and good morning. FFO for the second quarter was $0.53 per share representing growth of 3.6% excluding noncash GAAP rental adjustments and lease termination fees. This growth was primarily driven by high same property NOI and lower G&A related to the management transition in the second quarter of 2016. Same-property NOI growth was 1.3% in the second quarter, consistent with the indication we gave on last quarter's call that this quarter's growth rate will be at or below the low end of our full year guidance range of 2% to 3%. Base rent contributed 260 basis points to same-property growth. This contribution was primarily offset by net recoveries which as expected, attracted 100 basis points from same-property growth during the quarter. As we have discussed in prior calls, the second quarter of 2016 benefited from the completion of annual CAM and tax reconciliations as well as lower operating cost due to the management transition last year. As mentioned last quarter, our full year expectations for operating cost growth remain under 2% as we focus on improving the look and feel of our shopping centers while remaining disciplined about every dollar of capital spend. With respect to the balance sheet. During the second quarter we issued $500 million of 7 year unsecured debt at a rate of 3.65% using the proceeds to repay $283 million of secured maturities at a rate of 6.38%, an additional $100 million outstanding in our Tranche A Term Loan as well as amounts outstanding on our revolver. We completed the quarter with 0 drawn in our $1.25 billion revolver. Last night, we also announced the closing of a $300 million 7 year unsecured term loan. The proceeds from the new term loan were used to repay an additional $300 million of Tranche A Term Loan which matures in 2018. As of today, we have no remaining 2017 maturities and only $210 million of remaining 2018 maturities, putting us in a position where we won't have the access to the capital markets until 2019. Our unencumbered asset based our totals approximately 80% of our total NOI and our weighted average maturity on a pro forma basis for the new term loan is 5.6 years, representing a substantial improvement over the last 18 months. As a reminder, in September we anticipate prepayment outcome of an additional $97 million of secured debt maturing in 2020 at a rate of 6.3%. As we've mentioned on previous calls associated with this prepayment, we expect to recognize the gain on debt extinguishment of approximately $2 million to $3 million in the third quarter. While we originally expected gain on debt extinguishment to contribute approximately $0.01 per share to FFO during 2017, early repayments of our Tranche A Term Loan have resulted in losses on debt extinguishment which we now expect to largely offset the gain expected in the third quarter. And with that, I will turn the call over to the operator for Q&A.

[Operator Instructions]. The first question comes from Christy McElroy from Citi.

You discussed an accelerated pace of dispositions. It sounds like you expected to be -- end up a net seller for the year. Just to be clear, that few signs of potential dilutive impact that you think you could see is not currently in your guidance, correct? And does that assume that the net disposition proceeds would be allocated to debt pay down? And maybe you could provide a little bit more color on sort of the average cap rates on your Q2 disposition activity and what you're expecting for the balance of the year. Thanks.

Thanks, Christy, I appreciate the question. We do expect to be a net seller this year. The cap rates that we're seeing, as I mentioned in my prepared remarks, for what we sold in the quarter, were about 7%. What we sold after the quarter was in the mid sixes. And we continue to see pretty strong demand as it relates to investors looking for investments in the open-air segment. In terms of impact on guidance, again, as I alluded to, our current range can handle an outcome -- a wide range of outcomes. But we do expect, if we're a net seller, use those proceeds to pay off debt. And we'll update our guidance as those transactions actually close.

Okay and then just following up on your comments about not buying rents. Your net effective rent numbers are pretty stable. But we've seen -- we have seen a pickup in TIs from some of your peers given all the box retenanting. Are you seeing more pressure to increase TIs to maintain the level of spreads that you've been showing? Is that something that we could potentially see pickup in coming quarters as you release more of the bankruptcy space?

Christy, this is Brian. As you mentioned -- as we mentioned in our remarks, our TIs are in line with where they've been on a trailing 12 and our net effective rents continue to be strong. I would say that for some uses like entertainment, fitness or when we're optimizing a box, those TIs can be a little bit higher. But typically we're also getting higher rents and we're more than happy with the returns that we're getting on those investments. And I would say, look, competition for space at least for the best outcome in rent and TI. So the more competition that our team is able to draw for these spaces which we have been seeing, the better outcomes we'll have. So we feel pretty good about where we're at.

Our next question comes from Todd Thomas of KeyBanc Capital Markets.

In terms of the lease rate and economic occupancy, I think you talked about the 50 basis point headwind to small shop leasing in the third quarter from Route 21 and Payless. Can you help us understand though where those metrics might bottom the second half of the year? And what's in the model that you're in?

Yes, I mean, again, we do expect it to trough in the third quarter. When you think about the total impact of bankruptcies from 2017 on the year, it's about 60 basis points. Now a lot of that rent was in our first few quarters. So obviously, we're expecting the impact in the latter part of the year as those tenants are now out and out of occupancy as well as no longer rent paying. And we expect an acceleration actually in the fourth quarter given the progress that we've made releasing not only that space. But as I mentioned before, the 2016 bankruptcies. So when you take a step back, Todd and you think about what the potential impact could have been on this year, it could have been much more significant. Just on the 2016 bankruptcies alone, it could have been more than double what the current impact is. So I'm really pleased with the efforts of the team to get after that -- getting that space leased. And as I alluded to and I think this is an important point, we're leasing that space to better tenants. And one of the things I didn't highlight on the call is that we're replacing some of these anchor boxes. We're seeing great follow-through still in our small shop occupancy. So some timing disruption in the latter part of this year without a doubt. But I'm very encouraged in terms of how it's setting us up for future growth.

All right. Great. And then Jim, you've got, Kroger, Publix, [indiscernible] since they are all top tenants in the portfolio. And I was just wondering what you think about the changing growth or landscape, how you're thinking about the portfolio going forward given both Lidl's expansion in the U.S. and the Amazon Whole Foods news. And maybe for Mark, if you could comment then if there's been sort of any change in the thought process on your end either investments or in the capital markets or just more broadly around grocery anchored centers.

Hey, Todd, that's a 4 for 1 question there. Let me start and just tell you that the grocery segment, as you know, has always been a very competitive segment. And in fact, over the last several years, in addition to it being very competitive, has been struggling with food price deflation. And we'll see where commodity prices go going forward. I think for us as a landlord, we're very fortunate to have great partnerships with very strong survivors such as Kroger and Publix and others. And we look at the landscape of new competitive entrants. You mentioned two, Lidl and certainly, Amazon and Whole Foods, we would expect would grow that platform and don't forget Aldi. I think we've seen some statistics which would suggest that these new entrants into the space represent over 25 million square feet of net new demand. And as you would expect, we have discussions ongoing with all of them as it relates to what their expansion plans are. That can ultimately have a deflationary impact certainly on some of the existing competitors. But again, I think we're really well-positioned given our low occupancy cost with our grocers. If you look across our portfolio, we're well below 2% in terms of average occupancy cost with average sales well above $550 a foot. So we watch it very closely. But we're actually encouraged by what we see as a lot of capital being invested in a physical store, right? I think folks are realizing the importance of that to serve their customer. Mark and then in terms of its impact on our transactions.

Yes. So we continue to see very deep interest in open-air assets with grocery. So we're seeing, across many markets, both primary and secondary, deep bidding pools and strong values for these grocery [indiscernible] we haven't really seen any impact from some of the transactions that you mentioned. And so from our perspective, seeing this great pricing on grocery anchored assets, it's a nice validation of the assets but certainly can make it harder to buy as we remain disciplined [indiscernible] of capital. And when we see this liquidity, we're going to continue to try to take advantage of it like we have with the sale of Frankfurt and Eustis. I think we generated some interesting proceeds from those assets still of grocery anchored assets.

Our next question comes from Nick Yulico of UBS.

So your anchor repositioning and outparcel development yields dropped 100 basis points from the first quarter. How much of this was due to new expectations in leasing versus project mix?

It really was driven by project mix almost entirely as we expanded the scope of some of the existing projects and then some of the new projects we went on that we added. Again, 9%, I think is a phenomenal yield for what we're doing and where these assets are trading at several hundred basis points below that in terms of a cap rate. But it's really just the mix of transactions that we brought into the pipeline this quarter more than anything else. And expect to see us continue as we're moving projects and please take note of what we're moving into the shadow pipeline. And then what we've moved from the shadow pipeline into active and of course what we actually deliver. You'll see that we're establishing a really nice velocity of throughput into that value-accretive pipeline. And the last thing I'd just say there is a lot of what we're doing, as a few of you have noted in your research, it's smaller, it's more granular. And the importance of that is that we're able to get it executed in a reasonable timeframe at really nice compelling yields. So it's lower risk, higher yields. And what we're not including in those returns is the follow-on benefit that we're seeing from the small shop lease up when we replaced that anchor. And as we've talked about in the past, we're seeing that consistently better than 800 basis points of improvement when we replace that anchor. So we're very excited about the Lucky's Market that we added in Orlando to the redevelopment this quarter as well as the L.A. Fitness that we did in Chicago at High Pointe Center which was a center with a lot of vacancy. I had to give Vince and the team in Chicago some props for spotting that opportunity and getting right on it. I certainly appreciate the partnership we have with L.A. Fitness. So expect us to continue to find opportunities, to add value. And as I said when I joined the company, the scope of opportunity across our portfolio of over 500 assets is truly remarkable.

Okay. And then just one other question is on the overall leasing environment. I mean, one of the, I think, concerns out there is that when you hear about the retailers looking to go into open-air shopping centers, it's -- you know about the T.J. Maxx, Ross, pick your pet concept and pick a fitness concept and it's not clear what is the extra level of demand besides those types of tenants? I was hoping you could just talk a little bit more about what that pipeline looks like for demand.

Yes. I hit it a little bit and I appreciate the question and intro. Where I talked about every quarter our national account team does a survey of all the national tenants that they cover which includes tenants across all the categories I mentioned from restaurants through fitness, to service, to health and beauty, to grocery, to value, to off-price, et cetera. And what we're seeing there is a robust pipeline of store openings of over 12,500. And given the nature of our assets, what that actually doesn't include are the local and regional tenants that are such a core part of our small shop tenancy. As I take a step back and think about all of these headlines, I think they're missing the point that within the open-air segment, there is a lot of good, strong robust demand in addition to innovation that's occurring in many of those categories of tenants, particularly in health and wellness, fitness, restaurants, as well as you're seeing some of the value segments and we just talked about grocery. So we like what we see as where this creative disruption is going. We think that the weight of innovation, if you will, is actually favoring the open-air segment because it's lower cost, it's more proximate to where the consumer is and more convenient. So we're actually feeling pretty good about where things stand. Now there's always categories that are kind of out of cycle. And certainly, we're doing our best to manage that. But Brian?

And look, you mentioned innovation, Jim. I would just point to again TJX with 2 new concepts like Sea Air, Trading Post and HomeSense. We look at other home retailers that are expanding. In the grocery front, you're at -- you're seeing more online pickup and more specialty concepts that are entering new markets. We continue to see restaurant innovation really across the country. And look, as Jim mentioned, I think as retailers are becoming more prudent with their real estate decisions, it's important for us not only to have good real estate but a good basis, the redevelopment expertise and the remerchandising expertise and then finally just the relationships that our guys have both at the corporate and the regional level to continue to drive these results. So we feel pretty good about where things are and continue to look to reinvest and remerchandise for these uses in our centers.

And Nick, we wouldn't be delivering the results that we're delivering, were not for that demand.

Our next question comes from Jeff Donnelly of Wells Fargo.

My best to Angela and her family if she's listening. Jim, can you talk about the percentage of your tenants that are occupied but not paying rent compared to the longer term trends? I'm just curious if that's been changing? And does that touch some anchor tenants? Or is that really more of an in line tenant issue?

I don't think there's really any shifts in change. I think what you're referring to is dark but rent paying tenants. And we do -- that's held relatively stable and certainly, what have a few Kmart boxes that fit into that category that are teeing up some of the redevelopment that we have down in Naples and over in Miami Gardens. But no, we haven't seen any real change in that and actually have been aggressively getting after some of those earlier. And you see some of that coming through our early space recapture and some of that following through in terms of our lease term fees. But no real change other than I think our difference today is that we're getting after some of that stuff earlier and more aggressively to set up redevelopment.

I can follow up with you off line. But maybe as a follow for Brian, it's often said that one should never let a good crisis go to waste. I'm curious, are you finding retailers trying to take advantage of this environment? And maybe lobbying in more, I guess, looks like intra-lease term inquiries about rent relief or other sorts of concession, regardless of whether or not they need it, they're just effectively trying to capitalize on the situation?

I think retailers are always going to use the headlines and they're certainly doing now for better terms and deals. But generally, we continue to be able to drive rents. We continue to be able to get flexibility elsewhere in our shopping centers for both uses and for our ability to redevelop. And those we're actually expanding and doing business with, feel pretty good about their bricks and mortar expansion plan. So yes, we're certainly hearing some things. But net-net, I think we're doing fine.

But Jeff, it's also been an opportunity for us in certain markets where we've got the great national relationships. We've got great rent basis. And those are -- those tenants are seeking more reasonable occupancy cost levels. So for example, in Mobile, Alabama we're able to do that. In other markets, we're able to actually capitalize on our great national relationships and our low rent basis to add value to our centers.

Our next question comes from Alexander Goldfarb of Sandler O'Neill.

Just two questions, Jim. First one is, I don't think that you talked about Athena maybe a bit. But can you give us your thoughts on what you expect for store closings, bankruptcies for the back half the year? And then also, just in terms of your tenant conversations, what your expectations are for after the holiday season from another round of bankruptcies, store closings, et cetera?

Yes, Alex, this is Brian. First, Athena, they've been a great partner of ours for a long time and we're certainly in discussions with them on really all the locations across our portfolio and I think each individual location is different. There's certain circumstances for every space that we have. I would say that we feel pretty good about the demand in that size range for the spaces that we do get back from the likes of Five Below and just this quarter, we backfilled in the casino [ph] space in Springfield, Illinois with ComCast expended to see a 35% increase. So those conversations are ongoing and we feel pretty good about our ability to manage through that.

And then looking into next year, we've got obviously our watch list and focused on a few tenants. But I wouldn't say there's been any substantial changes to where that list has been in the past. And we're constantly monitoring that tenant health to get in front of it. Alex in fact, we wouldn't have had the results we had this year if we weren't getting in front of it, right? And we weren't anticipating things like Sports Authority [Technical Difficulty], et cetera. We wouldn't be minimizing that transitory impact.

Okay, okay. So your expectation is next year should be pretty stable to this year or you think it's better?

I think it's going to -- I think there's probably going to be some continued disruption, no doubt. I don't think -- obviously, I'm not going to comment on any particular tenants. But none of them would be surprised, let's just say that.

Okay. And then just second question. On the dispositions, have you noticed any change in lender appetite as you guys are marketing centers? Are you hearing anything from prospective buyers as far as whether its community banks or other lenders of those centers dialing back their underwriting of those? Or there's been no change on the lenders for the centers that you're selling.

For the centers that we're transacting on, we really haven't seen that much change. I mean, where we really benefit, I mean, in that markets is that some of the centers that we're selling are relatively small deal sizes. So we have deep interest from local community banks. We certainly transact in a larger deal sizes and haven't really had much pushback there either, but we're continuing to see our financing market that takes a little bit longer but the financing liquidity is still there.

Our next question comes from Vincent Chao of Deutsche Bank.

I just want to go back to the bankruptcy comments for 2017, the 60 basis point hit. I think last quarter, you talked about, if everything closed, it was a 125 basis point hit. So I guess at this point, is the visibility of the 60 basis points pretty clear or are there still some unknowns out there where closures to be a little bit higher? And also does that 60 contemplate any additional bankruptcies in the back half?

It does not contemplate any additional bankruptcies. And we did have a bankruptcy after last quarter with Ultra Foods which is a small grocer in the Midwest. But the other side of that is the big variables are, we now know basically what stores are going to be closed, right? And then we've been generating a lot of releasing on that activity as we attempt to resolve those locations that have closed. So 60 basis points is about where we expect the overall impact for the year to be. Again, releasing can be a -- can help us close that gap further but that's about where we expected to be.

Okay. And then just along those lines, in terms of the same-store NOI guidance of 2% to 3%, if you're sort of at or below the 2% range in the third quarter, depending on exactly what you assume, it does seem like there is a fairly wide range implied for the fourth quarter. And I'm just curious, is it realistic to think that the high end or the low end are really -- are going to be hit here? I mean, the low end seems to imply no acceleration and then the high end, something pretty gaudy.

Well, it is a big range still for the year. But take a step back and think about all the moving pieces that we have which include the 2016 and 2017 bankruptcies. It includes a tremendous amount of leasing activity. And where we end up in that range is going to be influenced by the timing of rent commencements which, Vince, can move a month or so and that has a significant impact. As well as on the other side of that and I alluded to it in my remarks. But I appreciate the question. We continue to recapture space early to set up anchor repositionings or redevelopments and that of course will have a near term impact on us. So we've kept the range wide and it reflects the fact that we do have a lot of moving pieces. But also importantly, that we do have a lot of leases signed that are going to be giving us tailwind into the fourth quarter and into next year. I mean, recognize that we have $33 million of ABR that's signed but not yet rent commenced. And expect us to continue to add to that tailwind, if you will, as we go into the fourth quarter and into next year.

Yes, I think that's the reason for the question. It just seems like you do have some visibility on the closure side and then you obviously know what's signed. And relatively, when it's going to commence. So just seems like a pretty wide range. But I got you. Thanks.

Yes, you bet, you bet. You can come help us with the model. Next?

Our next question comes from Karin Ford of MUFG Securities.

Staying on that same-store NOI growth theme. Do you think there's a new normal for same-store NOI growth in your portfolio given the changing environment as well as the changes in escalators that you highlighted?

Yes. When we joined and as we've executed upon this new plan, we expect that long term sustainable same-store growth rates to be in that mid to high 2% range. I think that we're doing a great job of biasing us towards the higher end of that range. And certainly, as I look at the rollover growth that's implied in our anchors that are expiring over the next 4 years at $8.25 and where we're signing the leases, I think we have a lot of long term visibility on that mark-to-market, if you will, in those assets. And then again, we're doing all that we can to take that embedded which is our cheapest form of growth, that embedded rent growth and those leases. And as we're signing these leases, we're not just emphasizing rollover growth, we're in fact driving better embedded growth. I'm real pleased with the over 2% embedded rent growth average we had on 94% of the leases that we signed this quarter. And that's really a result of focus and as Brian alluded to, making sure that we're driving competition for the space. And again, we continue to see that. So I think that we stand in good shape to hit our long term targets for several years to come.

Thanks for that. That's helpful. My second question is on dispositions. I appreciate the disclosure and what you have on your contract. Can you just talk about how big the disposition pool could grow to? How much are you marketing today? And since you can prepay the remaining term loan balance at anytime, what factors are determining the size of your disposition pool?

Well, thank you for the question. I'm not going to provide specific disposition guidance. We haven't done it. I'm not going to do it. The reason I'm not is I want to always maintain maximum flexibility there to make sure that we're doing our job as it relates to maximizing the value of what it is we're selling. The second point I'd make to you is our assets tend to be smaller in size. But it takes every bit as long to sell a $20 million asset as it does a $100 million asset if you're really truly focused on maximizing value. And so expect this pace that you're seeing increasing and what we have under contract to be more characteristic in the quarters for the balance of the year. But beyond that, I really don't want to get too specific. We're using the proceeds of these dispositions to deleverage. As you see, we did this quarter, we reduced our leverage by $100 million. And expect us to continue to do that on a net basis. On the other side of the capital recycling equation, in terms of acquisitions, we're saying no to a lot of things. The pricing still is pretty aggressive. In fact, we had a center sell down, a street from our Miami Garden Center, at a sub 5 cap rate. So again, we think on balance, at least what we see in the market right now better for us to be net sellers. But as a long term investor, we will of course capitalize where we see acquisitions like we did in Ann Arbor earlier in the year at appropriate IRRs.

Our next question comes from Floris van Dijkum of Boenning.

Quick question for you guys on -- encouraging on the small shop occupancy increase. What is your target? You run 85% now, right? Where do you think that's going to stabilize once you guys are done with the redevelopments?

I think we've got several hundred basis points of room to grow there. And as I've alluded to in the past, it's really through anchor repositionings where we see 800 basis points of improvement. It's through -- and redevelopments. It's through capital recycling as we exit single asset markets. It's such a local business for us that those assets drag our portfolio average by a few hundred basis points in those single asset markets. And then lastly, it's focus. And Brian, Mike and team are doing a great job of not just improving occupancy but I think is reflected in our bad debt numbers, improving the quality of tenants that we're bringing in to our centers. So we'll hold on to this space, not to put in a tenant that we don't believe in their long term viability. So again, I'm not going to give you a specific number. But we think it's several hundred basis points higher than where it is today and we expect to get there not in a matter of a couple of quarters. But over a couple of years.

Okay, great. I guess one other question and I appreciate that you don't want to give specific guidance on dispositions. But as you look at your debt-to-EBITDA, do you target that? And so could you maybe -- can you give a little bit maybe color around sort of your leverage targets? And maybe next -- is that part of what's driving the dispositions? Or is it purely a cost of capital calculation in your view?

Well, it's more primarily a cost of capital and capital allocation decision at the moment. As I've said before, our portfolio has a lot of embedded EBITDA growth and we're demonstrating that in what we have and we're on a very good glide path to take that with [indiscernible] today down 6x in the next year or two. What I think is also important to recognize, as we alluded to in the comments, Floris, is that we've done, really, Stacy and Angela have done a tremendous job of extending out our debt and putting ourselves in a position where we don't have to access the debt markets through 2019 which is, I think, particularly important given inevitably, there will be a lot of volatility. And so that capital flexibility is of utmost importance to us. And I think the team has done a tremendous job there. Just lay over what our maturity table was when we started versus where it is today. And I think we've done an outstanding job. And I think it's being recognized by the fixed income community for managing our balance sheet appropriately.

Our next question comes from Wesley Golladay of RBC Capital Markets.

Can you give us some updates on how the shop tenant is doing for the local shop tenants? We always see in the news that some of the brands, the big chain conception are not doing well. I'm kind of curious how the local tenant is doing.

Surprisingly well. Brian?

If you look at our ratio in terms of small shop deals, we were typically, in the past, around 60-40 between national and franchise versus local operators. That's been more 50-50. And the quality of the local operators we're seeing are existing businesses, somebody that has a restaurant or 2 in the market that wants to expand. We're seeing a number of maybe like local pet stores as well. But the team in the field has done a great job, really across-the-board looking at strong local concepts. And as we continue to invest in our centers, to Jim's point, when we're doing these anchor repositionings, when we're doing redevelopment, we don't want to just fill the centers with brands. While we do have a lot of relationships with national concepts across the country, we want strong local operators in our centers and we feel pretty encouraged about helping them.

Yes, the two things we look at, was, there are obviously the AR aging and the pace at which the rent is being paid and both of those indicators remain very strong through the year as well as and we do this is part of our budgeting process, we're looking at any amounts to dispute which is another sort of indicator of tenant health. And those are at also record low levels. Where there's a CAM dispute or something like that. It's something we watch really carefully and we continue to be very pleasantly surprised about what we're seeing in that local and regional tenancy.

Okay. And then looking at that 12,500 store openings that you alluded to, how long have you been tracking that number? And what's the overall trend in that data?

We've been tracking it since the second quarter I joined. And one of the things that we're holding the national accounts team accountable for is market share penetration with those tenants. And I'd say that it's held pretty steady. We've actually seen a slight growth particularly, Wes, with the addition of Tonya Creekmore and the restaurant and outparcel team. That's something I'm really proud of what Tonya and Eve have done. I think we had done maybe one or two outparcel deals in 18 months prior to our joining. We brought that team onboard last September. And as I alluded to in my remarks, we have over 40 deals at least executed or are being negotiated with $5 million of rent associated there. So that activity sort of expands our reach in terms of tenant coverage. And I think that's been a lot of the net ads on that.

And Wes, I would just add and Jim mentioned it earlier in his opening remarks, in fact your initial question about small shops. Those tenant -- that number of store openings does not include local tenants. So that's just national operators with announced store opening plans. So we actually feel pretty good about the local aspect of that as well.

Our next question comes from Haendel St. Juste of Mizuho.

Must've been asked, but a couple of quick ones for you Jim. I guess, first, at a high level, I was thinking about the grocery-anchored portion of your portfolio. You've got a 70% I think grocery-anchored, 18% of your ABR. I'm almost wondering in light of Amazon Whole Foods, how are you thinking about those levels going forward. Are you still comfortable with that? Should we see that to remain relatively the same? Net reduced? Have you been selling some assets? Just curious on how you're thinking about that.

I'm very comfortable with that exposure. And look, it's an industry that will continue to evolve and change. But it's one that will survive. I think that impacts -- and there will be changes, will be in things like store formats, the sizes of certain stores. I think you'll see some operators invest more in terms of the offerings around the perimeter of the store versus what they have in the middle of the store. But I think the Amazon transaction, if anything, in my mind which I don't think was really covered a lot, it highlighted the importance of a physical platform in that business. Not just the bricks and mortar but the business of delivering that assortment of goods and prepared foods and everything to the customer at a reasonable price. And remember, it's a very, very low-margin business. And it's always been that way. It's always been very competitive. And I think not just what Amazon's announced with Whole Foods, but also Lidl and Aldi, Kroger and Publix and Spout and Lucky's. We're seeing a lot of strong competition in that field which on balance, I think benefits us. I don't think we need anymore grocery stores in this country. But I do think we need better grocers. And I think that's what you're seeing a lot of these operators doing to stay competitive and healthy.

Appreciate that. And just curious. Have you seen any change in grocer cap rates here over the past couple of months? And then any change in demand for a planned grocer openings in your redevelopment pipeline?

Let me hit the second part of that first. We continue to see good grocery demand. In fact, this quarter, we added the Lucky's specialty grocer in Orlando which actually replaced L.A. Fitness. Cap rates are still pretty racy. Mark?

Yes, for the grocer assets that we've been selling, we continue to see strong demand. We see cap rates that, frankly, continue to be a bit surprising on the one we would like to buy. So we haven't seen any real change other than people continue to like well-located real estate.

Our next question comes from Samir Khanal of Evercore ISI.

Most of mine have been answered. But I was just curious about whether you or Brian, about your thoughts around Bed, Bath and Beyond. I mean, it is a top 10 tenant of most of the shopping center REITs. And I know that they've sort of talked about sort of publicly about looking to possibly rationalize their store bases. They have a sizable certain number of leases coming due over the next few years. So any color around this will be helpful as you think about sort of growth for the next 12 to 36 months here.

Sure, Samir, this is Brian. Another retailer which we have a tremendous relationship with and we're in discussions with them, feel pretty good about where our locations sit in our portfolio. They are continuing to open some new stores. I know there are a lot of headlines around their store closures. But they are expanding the world market business and andThat! which is their new Christmas tree concept. They opened in Kennesaw, Georgia and they're expanding that as well. And I think to Jim's point earlier, look, as retailers potentially look to reassess where they are in the market, we have an opportunity there in certain markets to be able to offer them real estate and pull them over to get maybe 1 or 2 concepts into a center. So we're in discussions with them, not just on the existing portfolio but where they're looking to potentially reposition as well. So net, we feel pretty good where we're at with them and continue to be in discussions on those locations.

And it's, Samir, an important point embedded to what Brian is talking about is they are focused on occupancy cost and as our all tenants. And we have a great national relationship with them and it allows us in certain markets to capitalize on the location that we have and importantly, the rent basis to relocate some of their stores. And we're seeing ourselves as a net beneficiary of that.

This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Stacy Slater for closing remarks.

Thanks, everyone, for joining us today. Have a great summer.