Hello, everyone, and good morning. I am Gustavo Sechin, Head of Investor Relations of Santander Brasil. I would like to welcome and thank you for joining us for our full-year 2022 earnings conference call. As you know, this event is being streamed live from our studio at our corporate headquarters in Sao Paulo, and we will be dividing into three segments. In the first one, our CEO, Mario Leao, will discuss the strategic pillars that will drive our growth, as well the main highlights from 2022. In the second part, Angel Santodomingo, our CFO, will present our quarterly and full-year results. And finally, in the last segment, we will host a Q&A session, where analysts will have the opportunity to interact directly with us. As a reminder, I would like to give a few instructions of our today's meeting. These events feature simultaneous translation. Simply select your preferred language. And if you would like to ask a question during the Q&A session, just click the hand icon in the bottom of your screen. With that, I would like to turn it over to Mario, who will begin the presentation addressing our current contests. Please, Mario.

Good morning, everyone. Thank you very much for joining us for our fourth quarter and full-year 2022 earnings call. It's a pleasure to be here again with everyone in a live and video format. I'll start today's presentation by discussing our performance in the past year, giving us the context and the wrap-up of 2022 and outlining my perspective, which is our senior management perspective on our potential going forward. First of all, I wanted to emphasize what we've been discussing for a few quarters already, which is our ability to effectively anticipate economic cycles. We've demonstrated this skill in the past, and we believe that our attitude to anticipate market trends has played an important role in bringing us where we are today. While our results are under pressure in the Individual segment and Consumer Finance, in part due to the expected deterioration in older vintages and client selectiveness, we view this as a natural part of the same growth cycle that led us to deliver a streak of record-breaking results over the past seven years. In addition to that, we had a subsequent event from a large company in our Wholesale division that impacted our results in this quarter. Although our current results may not be within our desired outcome so far, we are aware of and prepared to address the underlying causes. We have several growth opportunities ahead, which we described in our last earnings call, and we will be covering those in our session today. We are entering 2022 with a healthier balance sheet and better positioned to explore our growth initiatives going forward. With Selic rate declining, hopefully, and consumer spending expected to recover sometime in the second half of 2023, we project resumption in growth in our Consumer Finance business, which is the largest…

Thank you, Mario. Good morning, everybody. Good afternoon for those that are overseas. Pleasure being here again with you. So we go into the numbers, into the results specifically, starting in Slide 14 where we detail these numbers and our P&L. Main message about our numbers is that they reflect the moment of the cycle, where still revenues are impacted by prior decisions and provisions still have not started to improve. Our net profit, as you may see, amounted to almost R$13 million, R$12.9 billion last year. As we have stated throughout the year, our 2022 performance continues to be impacted by the most selective lending approach we have adopted in recent quarters; by our negative sensitivity to interest rates and also pressured by provisions coming from earlier vintages, as Mario has stated. Alongside with these three impacts, we have partially provisioned a subsequent event that occurred recently. With that in mind, let me go over a few of our key figures for the period. On the revenue front, total NII decreased by 6.8% in 12 months, with client NII exhibiting strong growth, but being more than offset by market NII due to the mentioned negative sensitivity to interest rates that you will know. In fees, the expansion of our customer base and greater transactionality led fees to increase by 2.3% over the period despite some pressure from credit-related commissions. And on the expense side, provisions grew in the quarter, impacted by this subsequent event. This is consistent with what I have been stating since our third Q 2021 earnings call. That's about one-year and something ago. Also, you can see that our delinquency ratios remain controlled during the period. Despite the challenges posed by inflation and salary agreements throughout 2022, general expenses have bounced by 7%, which is just…

Thank you, Angel. So wrapping up everything we said, main messages regarding our 2022. So our approach to client selectivity, which was designed already late 2021 and executed throughout 2022, aligned to our sensitivity to interest rates; impacted total revenues, as we noticed before; also other loan vintages deteriorated as expected. And now we find ourselves in one of the challenging periods of longer credit cycle. So we'd like to say that the credit cycle individuals lasted for six, seven years. We had record-breaking years in client base, topline, bottom line. And now 2022 and for some part 2023, we will be running under the tougher part of the credit cycle, where we expand less our portfolio on a more selective basis. That will result in a better asset quality overall, and we will see that throughout the next two quarters for sure. Along with that, talking about our 2023 context. So we start 2023 under the same, I would say, restrictions or selectivity in our credit portfolio. So we didn't alter our view and appetite simply due to the calendar. We will have more and more strategy focused on client selectivity, client loyalty. Obviously, we want to keep growing our client base. 60 million is already a very large number. We are very proud of that. But more importantly than growing to 61 million and 62 million, which will deliver anyway, is bringing those customers to become active and those are active to become loyal. That is one of the key reasons why we're very confident on our 2023 and ahead. We will keep our culture of efficiency, productivity and obsession, like I say, on reducing our cost to serve. That's the only way we're going to have mass market client base in a profitable way. So we keep…

Thank you, Mario. Thank you, Angel. We will now start our Q&A session. Our analysts will have the chance to ask questions during the Q&A, which will last for about 30 minutes. [Operator Instructions] So our first question is coming from Jorge Kuri from Morgan Stanley. Hi, Jorge.

Hi everyone. Good morning. Thanks for taking the time to answer questions. I wanted to ask you if the numbers that were published on the press about your exposure to Americanas of R$3.7 billion are correct? Is that the exposure that you guys have? What type of guarantees do you have on the back of those loans? What percentage of that exposure has been provisioned already? What is your expectation for how that's going to turn out in the first quarter results as a fully NPL or will take 90 days to become NPL? How much of the R$1 billion in additional provisions quarter-on-quarter that we saw this quarter was for Americanas? What percentage of the Americanas exposure is provisions? And how do you expect to cover the rest of the provisions over the next couple of quarters? That's evidently very important for us and the rest of the markets to understand what is your net income power for the next couple of quarters if you still need to create another R$3 billion or so in provisions? Thank you.

Jorge, nice to host you here. Thank you for participating and for raising questions as well. So the group Santander as a whole, and it's not different, Santander Brasil as the biggest operation we have in the group, we have not provided comments on specific names. That remains our stance towards the market. We understand the market is curious, anxious, and we understand it is relevant. We appreciate all that. But we have had that stance Jorge, and obviously, respectfully to you and to others that have questions, we will not comment on the particular case of the subsequent event. Yes, we have made one step in the direction of provisioning. You're going to notice in the numbers. And by looking at the levels or the scores that we report to the Central Bank, hopefully, you'll be able to understand more about how much we may. Like everyone – like every provision we have in our wholesale and also Minorista and also retail business, we always look at those portfolios as a film as a movie and not as a picture. So we will keep looking at this particular event, how it evolves. It is obviously in flux as you are all following through the press. So we will keep monitoring this throughout the year, like I understand most of the industry will. And as we evolve towards one direction or the other, we'll evaluate how much we provisioned versus how much we should keep doing. There's no preconceived decision as to how we move ahead. And again, that's the most we would like to share, given our stance of not commenting specific names, which remains the case. Thank you.

Great. Thanks.

Thank you, Mario. So our next question comes from Thiago Batista from UBS. Hi, Thiago. Good morning.

Good morning everyone. So I have two questions. I know that you cannot talk about Americanas specifically. But can you give us the size of the supplier finance of the – not only for Americanas, but all the industry? And what has changed since the case of Americanas? So are you changing the prices? Are you changing the process? Are you trying to check Central Bank, the size of exposure with other players? So what has changed it? And my second question about the payroll loans. You mentioned in the press release that you are expecting an expansion of 26% of the payroll loan book in 2023 of last year. And also, I would say, probably one of the biggest expansion in a couple of years. What has changed in this business? The changes were internally in Santander or we are seeing any change in the industry, to explain this much stronger expectation of growth for payroll loans? Thank you.

Thank you, Thiago. So I'll kick it off and Angel will complement. So starting with the – I wanted to cover firstly the strategy regarding – we call the supplier financing business. We call it confirming. It’s a name we use it here. That is [indiscernible] right? This is one of our, I would say, key businesses among wholesale clients, both our corporate banking business and our corporate and investment Banking business, the ultra large clients. There are many anchors, like we call them, with whom we operate this product. It's a product that has been evolving throughout the years, has been reviewed thoroughly by not only regulators, auditors and alike. And we're very proud of the franchise we've built, to be honest, regarding the product. And we have, like I said, dozens of bankers with whom: A, we keep operating; B, we keep willing to operate and expand. And we keep having a healthy relationship with them as anchors and with their suppliers as those that are anticipating their receivables. We actually just launched last year, we have here in the presentation, a channel, which we call SX Integra which is a digital channel to which suppliers can anticipate their receivables on a self-serving format, which is already the largest self-serving or digital platform for receivables anticipation in supply chain financing. So we not only believe in the business, but we are expanding the ways to which we offer to anchors and suppliers alike. More facility, agility and obviously, capacity to serve. And in terms of our risk appetite, we remain committed to the product like we were before.

In terms of exposure, that was your first question, what we do publish and release is our exposure to the retail sector, and I think if I remember what is very really around the 3%. So highly diversified portfolio, as always, with very low exposures as a percentage of the loan portfolio. This is something that it is included in our governance in our risk appetite limits and alerts, and we have the principle of highly diversifying exposures and risks.

Thank you, Angel. Thank you, Mario. Please, Mario.

So just covering the [indiscernible] so the macro perspective I want to share regarding the payroll loans is that why we're expanding – well, obviously, we're expanding because we believe in the risk/reward proposition. We like the risk/reward proposition of all of our products, particularly in the moment where we have a tougher macro context with lower disposable income, et cetera. Payroll deductible loans are obviously healthier than clean consumer loans, like everyone else is looking at. So why we have focus is obviously because of the risk/reward proposition, but also because we believe we have a differentiated product here. The digital payroll loan or Consignado digital, we say in Portuguese, is a very, very efficient offering. And I would say, best-in-class where customers that are served to our app, payroll customers, they can really through a digital process that takes seconds. They can raise their payroll loans in a digital way. So part of our strategy has been digitalizing more and more our contracts. Last year, we had a record year of hundreds of hundreds of contracts of payroll contracts with anchors were digitalized. And the second part of our strategy to be wider is we obviously focused on INSS, the pension customers. We obviously focus on government-related but we have a very strong franchise in private sector payroll loans. We have a very large penetration given our cross-selling attitude. So our wholesale business is strong. We have a lot of payrolls with our wholesale clients. And we've been able to have payroll anchoring contracts with several of those wholesale customers, and that has been a very successful part of our strategy. So joining the digitalization effort, plus a private sector-oriented cross-selling effort with our wholesale business, together with a lot of emphasis in terms of our distribution retail network. Those three things together have been a success story for 2022, and we are very confident that with the same pillars, we will have an even stronger 2023 in payrolls.

Thank you, Mario. So moving forward, our next question comes from Eduardo Rosman from BTG. Hi, Eduardo. How are you?

Hi, everyone. Good morning. So I have one question here and it's related to your capital base. You ended the year with a core capital of 10.8%. It's down quarter-on-quarter and year-on-year. So trying to understand here what's the minimum level that you would like to work with. Naturally, your profitability will likely be under pressure in the next two quarters, right? And you have a payout ratio of 50%, which is above average, right? So just trying to understand here how you see your capital. If you could see a change in the dividend policy, it would be interesting to know from you? Thanks.

Thank you, Eduardo. Okay, let me elaborate a little bit around capital and payout. Yes, we did close 10.8% of core equity Tier 1. We have always said that we wanted to be at around 11%, and this is where we are and where we have been managing both risk-weighted assets growth and payout. You're right, our payout last year has been around 52%, 53%, which is a kind of a conclusion of how we see risk-weighted assets growth and how we see return on equity on a structural basis looking to the future. So as a reference, 50% payout may work. Obviously, we will adjust that according to the Board and according to each of the different years. But I mean on the long-term, this is where we kind of think about in terms of payout. In terms of capital, not only we are comfortable with this 11% that was mentioned. I also said throughout my presentation that we do have a new regulation, the famous 229 coming from the Central Bank, the Brazilian Central Bank, that it was due to start 1st of January, and it has been postponed to 1st of July this year, 2023, okay? This is a series of kind of advancing and getting closer to Basel III. But in conclusion, it means around 70 basis points to our core equity Tier 1, additional 70 basis points, 7-0, to our core equity Tier 1 ratio. So not only by profits and by growth, but also by this new regulation, we will again be well above the 11%, and we will probably have to manage that to get closer to the 11%. This is our strategy in view of our capital.

Thank you, Angel. Our next question comes from Rafael from Citibank. Hi, Rafael.

Hi, guys. Good morning. I have basically two questions here related to one related to asset quality. So you mentioned that the new vintages are performing very better, and this should have embedded asset quality going forward. But when I look specifically for the quarter, it seems to me that NPL creation is, in fact, accelerating, especially we've put together the asset sale in the quarter. So just to understand if it's – maybe here is the peak and we should start to see us NPL creation specifically to perform better in coming quarters. And also, if you could comment on the asset quality for the renegotiated portfolio, if this is one of the reasons for this increase in NPL creation or if there is any change in the asset quality of the renegotiated portfolio? Thank you.

Yes. Well, let me elaborate a little bit. In terms of quality of risk, I mean, I think – and we have been quite intense in this remark. I think that we all have to understand the through-the-cycle concept, okay. So we are managing a bank, not for this quarter, not for next year, next quarter. We are managing a bank through the cycle. And we've got a cycle now that, as we have said, it is pressured on the revenue side, and it still hasn't got better on the provisions on the quality of risk side. But what we are seeing is that, that selectiveness is provoking, as you said in your question, that the new vintages are far better than the ones we have been producing, let's say, four or five quarters ago. And we saw some numbers. Mario mentioned, the NPL, how it compares the new vintages with the old ones. In some cases, almost half of it or 70%, 60% of what it used to be. The different ratios, the loss absorption ratio, et cetera. So yes, we are seeing a quality where we want it to be and where we are producing with a strong growth levers, but with controlled quality. And this is basic to understand how the future may look like. In terms of NPL formation, in terms of renegotiation, all these things, you've got the numbers. I mean the renegotiation portfolio has more or less been stable. We have said quite openly since the first Q of this year that we have been proactive with our clients, absolutely proactive. We wanted to help them, and this is something that is both on a duty side, but also on an economic side. We made a campaign in January 2022, and we have throughout the year continued to be proactive in the renegotiation of this debt. So yes, it is something that, again, through the cycle view in this point of the cycle, we have all to understand. And the NPL formation, obviously, is a conclusion, as you perfectly said, of all what I have said in terms of quality, sale of portfolios, renegotiations, et cetera. Thank you.

Thank you, Angel. Now I would like to call Pedro Leduc from Itau his question. Pedro, good morning.

All right. Thank you. Thanks for the question again and hosting the call. I would like to change subjects a little bit to client NIMs, okay? We see it fell again this quarter about 50 bps, second one in a row. Related, we see client portfolio changes, some funding mix changes here as well. I would like to get your help to see how portfolio assignments or the renegotiation spreads had something to do with this NIM dynamic. So at the end, trying to understand the moving pieces as we look into NIMs for 2023. Any help here would be much appreciated?

Thanks, Pedro. Great to have you here again. So I'll start, and then Angel can complement with the actual figures. So directionally speaking, which I think is an important thing for us to lever first angle, we're being more selective. So on a marginal basis, let's call it, healthy or active or even recent portfolio, which is already representing 50% or almost 50% of the overall portfolio, like I mentioned before, that portfolio because it is stricter in terms of risk appetite ratings on the higher end of our scale, that means those clients pay are fewer clients, of course, more competitive and clients which absorb lower rates naturally speaking. So the production of new assets, and I'm talking about new, new assets, compared to the maturity of older vintages, both maturities and provisioning of older vintages, that has a different spread dynamics naturally. It's by design, and you're seeing here some of the effects. Obviously, like myself and Angel mentioned before, the production of cost of credit in those portfolios will be lower, and it's already been shown, and that more and more will be visible in our results. The second angle is when we look at our renegotiation portfolio, which is one of the portfolios that grew most last year, as you can all see, that has to do with our attitude towards the credit cycle. We are proud to say we have a very strong individual credit engine here. And as we look at this through the cycle, we had to be more proactive last year. We actually had a campaign last year, which was this individual one, which you all followed, which allowed us to talk to clients on a more proactive basis. And earlier in the deterioration cycle. That caused our renegotiation portfolio to increase for sure. Some of that renegotiation, well, ends up being provisioned, of course, because although we renegotiate in some aspects. That buying time works for many clients, and it doesn't work for others. So yes, some of the effects you're seeing here has to do with the spread, the effective spread we have in our renegotiated portfolio, which tends to be lower as time passes than as they were compared to as they were before. Angel, I don't know if you want to complement.

No, you're absolutely right. I mean just to add to this selectiveness argument, you have also the mix. We have shown to you. We are growing in real estate – mortgages, sorry. We are going in agro. We are growing in payrolls. I mean these types, we have a 65% collateralized exposure in individuals. So we have moved the balance sheet not only to a more solid one, but also to a more collateralized one, which also means, obviously, that has lower cost of risk and also means having lower cost of risk that the spread is lower. But if you remember from the presentation, we are at about one – I think it's one year or one year and four or five Qs at the same level in terms of spread. Okay? I think it was 10-point something, which means that we maintain – we've gone through an upward point, but we are maintaining past spreads in terms of portfolio, but obviously, much more comfort.

And Pedro, if I may just quickly complement an angle which we don't talk much because obviously, the emphasis is more on individual than perhaps PMS. On our wholesale business, obviously, there is the subsequent event I won't cover, but the overall performance of our mid-corporates and large corporates business has been, over the credit cycle, including over the last many years, have been very, very healthy and record by record. The thing about this is we've been very selective in wholesale, in particular, so large corporate and ultra large corporates. We have been very selective, not due to credit appetite but due to marginal ROE. So we haven't grown more our wholesale business last year, particularly because – not because we didn't have the credit appetite, but because the spreads there were lower than we believed were fair for us to place our capital on those deals. That has marginally improved this year given the subsequent event. Let's see how it evolves throughout the year. I guess this was also asked before. Yes, we've seen a marginal increase in at least short-term spreads in wholesale. Let's look at whether that prevails throughout the year. And obviously, it's going to be positive because we are lighter, if you will, in our wholesale business because we're more conservative in terms of capital allocation here.

All right. Thank you, Mario. Thank you, Angel. The next question is coming from Flavio Yoshida from Bank of America. Hi, Flavio. Good to see you.

Hi. Good to see you guys. Thanks for the opportunity to ask questions. So I was remembering here and you guys were vocal on the fact that Santander was the first bank to become more conservative on loans turning more selective on origination in September of 2021, right, if I'm not wrong. However, we are still seeing deteriorating early NPL trends, right? It's even higher than pre-COVID levels. We still see high loan renegotiation levels and also high provisionings. So all of these were spreads trending down. So it seems that we are only seeing the negative effects of this change in strategy. So I was wondering if we are yet to see the positive effects of this change in strategy. And also, question related to this is, is there any signs you're expecting to see in order to improve your credit risk appetite? Is it like better NPLs, better macro or competitive environment?

Okay. Thank you, Flavio. I mean, I think we have spoken several times about quality, et cetera. The 15 to 90 days is much more volatile, as I have said several times. If you go to the 90 days, it's basically stable during the last four, five quarters. It's stable if you compare it with last year, with two years ago. And we have shown the new vintages that we are far more comfortable. So all in all, again, it's a question of time. When will we open the pipeline again to other type of risks, obviously, we have tests and pilots test, all continuously being made when we see that things become to a profitable level so that we can reopen or reproduce in terms of volume growth. Okay. Thank you.

Now we have a question from Yuri Fernandes from JPMorgan. Hi, Yuri. How are you?

Hi, Gustavo. Thank you for opportunity for asking questions. I would like to return to the loan growth. I guess, on Slide 12, you have some targets there like commercial loans growing 13%, agribusiness loans growing 33%, consumer finance that is basically out to loans growing 18% over year, and industry is growing at 7% today. So I would like to return to Flavio's questions on loan growth and just understand like the appetite of the bank because sometimes I hear Mario and Angel saying that makes too cautious. But those were they seem pretty strong, right, for 2022 loan growth. So I would like to ask this, like how you are seeing on growth? How much should Santander really grow? Because looking to those segments, you should be growing at double digits in 2023. And if I may, just on spreads. So you are saying basically that spreads will remain flattish, more or less in line with the fourth Q right? So if that's the case, maybe NII should grow – NII clients should grow below the volume. So is that fair? And is that a fair assumption for you in 2023? Thank you.

Thank you, Yuri. I'll cover your – the first bulk of your question, which is more a strategic one, and then I'll ask Angel to cover the numbers per se. Your question is great, and I thank you for raising this. So when we share our ambition here, and it's obviously highlighted as an ambition, it's not a guidance, but it's where we are directed. We did it last quarter, as you may recall, and we're doing this again. And by the way, we're going to keep repeating this because we want to tell you how we're doing. We want to show where we're focused on a more accelerated path than overall. Are we going to grow so much in consumer loans unsecured? Probably not. Are we going to grow so much in other unsecured pieces of the business, although they have higher margins? Probably not. So we highlight here some of the angles at which we're going to grow at a more expedited way. And why we are doing this, not because we want to show you just numbers, but we believe that these portfolios are on a risk/reward basis. Given the customer base we have, given the customer base with whom we have risk appetite, these are the portfolios which we can grow at a more accelerated pace. So companies I mentioned before, we've performed our record year last year in all different pieces of the business. We have a growing but important May business. But then starting with the lower PMIs, mid-PMIs and large PMIs, record year. Middle corporates, large and ultra-large again, despite the subsequent event, we had a record year. So we're very comfortable that without any arrogance, we've evolved our maturity and expertise regarding this portfolio, and we are confident we can keep growing at a double-digit rate. Agro, the same thing and an even higher double-digit level. We believe we've expanded geographically enough. We've understood better the cycles, the vintages and the different commodities we operate in Brazil. And we're very comfortable that among wholesale and retail, it's not only a retail agribusiness, it's wholesale and retail. We're going to grow at an even higher pace than we did last year. And then Consumer Finance, which is secured, of course, because it has the auto there, but it's a portfolio which is always more volatile and has its own credit cost. We believe we've evolved a lot in our risk models last year. We believe we have the right partnerships with the big O&Ms. We believe we have a very strong distribution network with the retailers, the auto retailers, particularly in used cars, and we are very comfortable. Yes, we can grow here at the double-digit rate as well this year.

In terms of volumes and NII, NIMs, et cetera, I mean we've got a country that will probably be growing at 1% - around 1% GDP, plus another 5%, around 5% inflation. So that's in number terms, 6%. You've got several of the bank's association saying 8% growth in terms of volume for 2023. You've got the public banks role, et cetera, et cetera. So it doesn't look like it's going to be a huge year in terms of volume growth. But as Mario said, we have clearly analyzed and stated for you which are the lines in which we want to grow. In terms of NII, clients, et cetera, obviously, I always say to you, let's calculate the NIM net of cost of risk because you always have one part which is where we produce, and the other part is what is the cost of risk that is happening linked to that. And obviously, in different timing. So it's not an easy one. But we are confident in terms of both NII clients and NIMs.

Thank you.

Thank you, Angel. Thank you, Mario. So I would like to thank everyone for attending this conference call, which was my last as Head of Investor Relations as we will be assuming a new position in the group. At this point, I would like to take the opportunity to thank you all for such great partnership over the last two years. And also I would like to introduce Camila Stolf, please Camila, as the new Head of Investor Relations and will be in charge of the depart moving forward. Welcome, Camila.

Thank you, Gustavo. And thank you, everyone, who's attending this video conference. Following this video conference, we and our entire Investor Relations team are going to be available for any further questions you may have. I look forward to meeting you in the coming months, hopefully, personally. Thank you, and have a great day.

Thank you, all.