Yes, it’s shifted. I’ll let Lou comment more, but some of the order delays, which are obviously factored in the numbers overall by this point in time, but -- it’s been an implementation -- about two months of delays. I think you can think about it in that terms. I mean, there’s pluses and minuses, there are some delays that are a few weeks and some may be a little bit longer. But on average, it’s around that particular area. I mean, most of our customers, if not all of our customers have been very supportive of shifting supply of steel and other components from Europe to, say, Asia associated with their particular projects. we haven’t had any difficulty so far with any customer around making those changes, obviously, in supply chain coming out of Europe and shifting it overseas. There’s -- as we get into specific components and a few things here and there on the parts aspect, it delayed a little bit on some of the revenues. But we’ve also -- as you can see in the balance sheet, we increased inventory by I think roughly USD10 million-ish, somewhere in that category, but we increased inventory to help compensate for some of those lagging parts, so that we were in a position to leverage our parts business, in particular, in the fossil fuel sector when a lot of our clients have been running those plants 24/7. It put a delay on when we could go in and do -- take advantage of that and put new parts in, services in, field services and the like. So that afforded us the opportunities to kind of figure out some of the global supply chain aspects around it and we feel pretty confident now that once we get into this, that we’ll be in a pretty good position to provide those fundamental parts and services, and we’re starting to see that happen already. So it’s -- to us, I think we’re in a good position there. But Lou, anything you want to add to that?