Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. My name is Desiree, and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Cable One Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2023 Earnings Call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speakers’ remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to turn the conference over to Todd Koetje, Chief Financial Officer. Please go ahead.

Good afternoon, and welcome to Cable One’s Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2023 Earnings Call. We’re glad to have you join us as we review our results. Before we proceed, I would like to remind you that today's discussion contains forward-looking statements relating to future events that involve risks and uncertainties. You can find factors that could cause Cable One’s actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements discussed during today’s call, in today’s earnings release and in our SEC filings, including our annual report on Form 10-K. Cable One is under no obligation and expressly disclaims any obligation, except as required by law, to update or alter its forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Additionally, today’s remarks will include a discussion of certain financial measures that are not presented in conformity with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles or GAAP. When we refer to free cash flow during today’s call, we mean adjusted EBITDA less capital expenditures as defined in our earnings release. Reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures discussed on this call to the most directly comparable GAAP measures can be found in our earnings release or on our website at ir.cableone.net. During today’s call, whenever we refer to our results on an adjusted basis, we are excluding certain non-core assets we divested in the Second quarter of 2022, which exclusively provided business services. Joining me on today’s call is our President and CEO, Julie Laulis. With that, let me turn the call over to, Julie.

Thank you, Todd, and good afternoon, everyone. We appreciate you joining us for today’s call. With nearly a decade under our belt as a public company, I’d like to start off today’s call with a brief reflection on our contrarian roots and how I believe they contribute to our success today and into the future. We have always been a different kind of operator. Our safe harbor strategy that concentrated on small cities and large towns really pivot away from video to broadband and focus on attractive roaring broadband acquisitions are just a few examples of how we have set ourselves apart from other providers in the past. Today, we continue to lean into those contrarian roots, leveraging our differences and evolving for the future. We have a plan to achieve balanced growth over time, a robust infrastructure to support customers’ increasing needs for bandwidth in a diversified rural footprint where our local operations and the neighborly experience we provide is a meaningful differentiator. We believe this combination will continue to drive high margins and generate significant free cash flow. In the fourth quarter of 2023, Cable One was among the few operators who grew customers, expanding our residential broadband base by more than 1,600 customers. Notably, this growth was driven by both an improvement in new connects year-over-year and sustained load churn rates. We have re-engineered our go-to-market approach to strategically target new customer segments with attractive pricing and product offerings, deployed countermeasures to address competition and expand our network footprint. We believe these changes to our tactical plan drove our results. This customer growth momentum began at the end of third quarter, persisted throughout the fourth and continues to-date. Similarly, our unconsolidated investments continue to show strong customer and financial growth. While we are focused on increasing our…

Thanks, Julie. Before discussing our 2023 full-year results, I’d like to start by touching on some of the key quarterly figures from our fourth quarter financials. For the fourth quarter of 2023, our total revenues were $411.8 million a 3.2% decrease from the fourth quarter of 2022, driven by a 21.3% decrease in residential video revenues. Residential data revenues, however, increased 2.1% year-over-year with PSUs growing more than 1,600 during the fourth quarter. Business services revenues declined 0.5% year-over-year whereas data services revenue within the business services offerings exceeded the comparable residential data revenue growth rates. Net income was $115.3 million for Q4 2023 compared to a net loss of $77.2 million in Q4 of 2022. Adjusted EBITDA was $226.9 million a decrease of 2.7% when compared to 2023 as revenue gains in data services were outpaced by revenue attrition rates in the video product. Adjusted EBITDA margin expanded 30 basis points to 55.1% year-over-year. Capital expenditures totaled $115.6 million in Q4. During the quarter, we invested $21.9 million of CapEx for new market expansion and $9.4 million for integration activities. Our fourth quarter capital expenditures were elevated due to timing of strategic projects with the completion of several large initiatives and the launch of new ones. We also capitalized on opportunities to procure discounted equipment for future network expansion, particularly for enhanced [ACAM] (ph) projects backed by 15 years of government funding. Additionally, we accelerated the deployment of our wall-to-wall Wi-Fi products, which has significantly enhanced the customer experience and bolstered retention rates. These investments reflect our commitment to long-term growth and operational excellence. Adjusted EBITDA less capital expenditures decreased from $126.4 million in the fourth quarter of 2022 to $111.3 million in the fourth quarter of 2023. This decrease is primarily driven by the higher capital expenditures incurred…

Thank you. The floor is now open for your questions. [Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Nik Aluru with JPMorgan. Your line is open.

Hey, good afternoon. Thanks for taking the question. First on the broadband ARPU deceleration, thanks for the discussion on the low-end offers pressuring ARPU here. But I’m curious what the impact may have been from the existing sub base like the retention offers you mentioned, or if there’s been any down tiering or anything that you’ve noticed? And then second, Todd, on the balance sheet, you mentioned net leverage at 3.85 times now. How do you view the target leverage for the company here? And then as we look out two years, given potential funding for MBI and having to take on that balance sheet, how do you think about how MBI could impact your target leverage range? Thanks.

I’ll start out, Nik, it’s Julie. So, yes, we have had some, we’ve been more willing to do promotional and discounted offers, especially targeted at the value conscious segment. And that is a change or an evolution from our past where we were more specifically concentrating on the higher end LTV customers. We’ve also done some pricing and packaging changes and some, what I would call pretty strong competitive response, actions in just a few markets. And we’ve seen, really good results from that. What do I call good results, well, I’d say if an over builder pulls a contractor, that’s a good result. If an over builder stops building in our area, that’s a good result. If we are actually growing in that hyper competitive market, that’s a good result. And those are all things that we have seen from that type of response. In terms of cannibalization, if I look at something as simple as selling about 80% of our new customers are customers are coming in at the 300 meg level or above. So, I still think we’re doing well in the majority of our markets, but we have taken some strong responses to ensure that we are defending our marketplace and growing our data penetration rates.

And then, Nik, it's Todd on the balance sheet side of the equation. I think, Julie nailed most key points on ARPU. As you know, Cable One has always maintained a philosophy of a very conservative balance sheet. We don’t have a target leverage profile per se, but we’ve operated the business throughout, various economic environments in that kind of 2.5 times to 4.5 times leverage range. We were comfortable taking the leverage up to that 4.5 or near that with the Hargray transaction. We also were issuing capital at near 0% interest rate. So it’s not only just about the multiple, but it’s also the cost of capital that we view as an important factor in managing that balance sheet. The 3.85 that we’re at right now, as you can see from the disciplined repayment that we’ve been enacting here in the last few quarters and will continue as we’re moving that debt balance down, that reduces our highest tranche of capital, which is our floating rate debt under the revolver. It also, enhances our unfunded committed revolving capacity under that $1 billion committed revolver that we extended earlier last year with a syndicate of our relationship banks. And all of that was very intentional as we think out to your other question of the prospects of preparing that balance sheet for events, like an MBI, and we feel like that transaction and the timing associated with that transaction will align with that, that leverage range that I outlined previously to you.

Yes, understood. Thank you, both.

You bet.

Our next question comes from the line of Greg Williams with TD Cowen. Your line is open.

Great. Thanks for taking my questions. Julie, you mentioned, the need for balanced growth, and you’ll see some pressures on ARPU in the near-term. And, yes, it could be an acceptable trade-off. I’m just wondering, what does near-term mean? How do we think about the ARPU pressures over the next few quarters and through the year as you sort of target the low-end and play some defense? And also just second question is, buybacks do seem to be on the back burner. Todd just mentioned shoring up the balance sheet. So, is it sort of safe to figure while the stocks down at these levels, the balance sheet repair is prioritization here? Thanks.

Great. So, yes, pressure in the near-term, we’ve operated in these small cities, large towns and just because we’re in communities that are not urban, doesn’t mean that these folks are getting a substandard network. And in fact, the opposite is true. We were one of the first operators, if not the first to offer a gig service, for example, back in 2015. We have symmetrical multi-gig service across our HFC plant, although the majority of the plants is fiber now. And we have been operating in these markets for decades. And I give that to you, Greg, as context that we are going to defend our markets, and we are going to grow market share. So, I do see a near-term pressure as we defend some markets. It’s nice that we’re dispersed across 24 states remembering that our average market size is 20,000 customers. So, an impact of a competitor anywhere is not an impact to us overall. But we’re going to have to take you on this journey with us. We’re experimenting and learning and we’re being really methodical. We’re trying to be incredibly segmenting the marketplace very targeted. So, that we can balance ARPU in different types of markets overall over a multi-year period. I think we are going to show nice growth overall, but it is going to be a journey as always our focus is on taking care of our associates, our customers and generating significant free cash flow. So, I’m not overly concerned about revenue in the short-term.

And, Greg, one thing I’ll just add on that. I mean, we talk about ARPU a lot. It’s a very key factor from an economic perspective, but we have a multidimensional playbook in terms of the behaviors at which we’re both looking at customer acquisition as well as customer retention. And, we’re big believers in that acquisition and that retention of those customers is key to our long-term value creation for our owners. And we’ve talked about where our penetration rates have been extensively in the past, and we feel we can continue to demonstrate to our shareholders, our associates, our communities that we can be the leading provider in these markets and expand that penetration, and that’s what we’re doing. As it relates to the balance sheet, I wouldn’t call it repair it, I think was the term you used, because we’ve always been very, balanced in how we’ve utilized, the balance sheet, both from, debt issuance and the cost and the term of that. So, we feel like it’s very long-term, highly fixed, and puts us in a great spot to be in a good position to grow. We did pull back on the buybacks, in the last few quarters. You saw, I’ll remind the audience that we did issue in 2020, we issued equity and we bought back almost 150% of the number of shares that we issued in 2020 at a nearly 50% discount to the price that we issued at. And, as we think about investing in ourselves, it’s always investing in the network, investing in our people, it’s investing in ourselves in many cases through the buyback of shares, but we also very much do believe in the return of capital to shareholders and running a long-term business is the discipline around borrowing and repaying debt, and that’s credibility with our creditor partners, and I think that’s credibility with our shareholders as well. So, we will be maintaining a balance there, but as we prepare the balance sheet for future events, and want to continue to maintain that conservative philosophy, you will see us, be a little bit more focused on debt repayment. We’re not big believers in the perpetually leveraged business model.

Got it. Understood. Thank you.

Next question comes from the line of Frank Louthan with Raymond James. Your line is open.

Great. Thank you. So you’ve built quite a bit. I mean, you passed about 70,000 homes for the year, yet still kind of losing subs. What’s sort of the take rate on the new homes passed? And, when can we start to see that begin to add to the level of subs that you see growing? And at what point do you think it’s you can kind of call a win there and see positive broadband subs for a full year?

Frank, I’ll start with that one, Todd, you feel free to jump in. But the home staff that you see came on in the last half, really the last quarter of the year, which actually makes me think about how we approach how we build. But, those will become homes. I mean, those will become customers. A lot of that is fill in, some of that is building new plant for new developments, but a lot of it’s still in, meaning a home has just popped in where we already have planned. And, I actually went through every single one of those that was built. And the penetration rates there match the penetration of their systems, if the tenure is longer than a quarter and in the majority of the case here, it is not. So, these represent opportunities for us in 2024. I’m not going to comment on what I think about 2024s growth. What I will say is, we are concentrating on growing in 2024 and leave the guidance out of it.

Yes. And Frank, as you saw for the quarter, CapEx was considerably higher than where it was in Q2 and Q3. And, we talked about it’s hard to be super predictable on what a quarter-to-quarter CapEx is even though the full-year CapEx came in below where we’ve run in the past and as I outlined in my remarks, will be lower in 2024 as we manage expectations to that kind of low-300s or what I would call the low-end of that 35% to 38% as a percentage of EBITDA that we’ve talked about in previous quarters. But, you can see also that, that CapEx moving up in the fourth quarter, does correlate to many of those projects that were being completed, had some timing elements associated with them, but also even a few that we initiated as new ones, that came with long-term, support from the enhanced ACAM, regulatory programs. So, there will be opportunities for sure for us to prosecute in 2024.

Okay. Thank you. And just to be to be clear, so you’re saying when you mostly these areas that you build after one quarter, you’re at mid-30% penetration on those homes?

No. I’m saying if they’ve been homes for a period of time. So, we watch them every single week to tell you the truth. But these are these only have a week a month, three months in the barn. So, their penetration rates are not as going to be as high as the system that they exist in. But over time, those new build areas will match the average system penetration or be higher.

So, how long does that take for them to match the existing system?

It really, Frank, it would depend on what system we’re talking about. Is that a system like well, I won’t say the name because I also know competitors list. And is that a system that doesn’t have a competitor other than the LEC, we’re going to get there pretty fast. Is that a system with two fiber over builders and a LEC, it’s going to take us longer.

Okay. Thank you.

Our next question comes from the line of Craig Moffett with MoffettNathanson. Your line is open.

Julie and Todd, I wonder if you could just, add a little bit more color to the kinds of offers that you’re using when you talk about competing with, it sounds like you’re mostly talking about, offers to compete with new fiber entrants. But are you also doing offers that are aimed at competing with fixed wireless broadband? And if so, how do those look different than what you’re doing in specific geographic markets where you’re facing a fiber competitor?

Yes. Craig, and Julie can jump in as well. But, one of the things we talked about in our Q3 call, was where we had rolled out initially, focused on both that value segment, but also to go head-to-head with that fixed wireless mobilely architected broadband product, was that 100 meg service at $25 as a promotional price. And with that, what was really more of called I’ll call the flash sale, in late Q3, of which we piloted different types of offerings in Q4, we saw the sell in of those initial offers come in meaningfully higher than the tier that was being offered with that promo, if that makes sense. So in Q3, it was well over two-thirds of the customers that either called in for that offer or came in for that offer. Our great sales team was able to convert them higher based on their needs and listening to their needs and what their average monthly utilization and capacity requirements were, and we see that continuing here in the fourth quarter and to-date. But we feel it’s both. We feel it's like, making sure we go, to all cohorts and all segments in these towns and communities that we serve, but ensuring with a better and more reliable product, we can compete head-to-head with that fixed wireless offering. And you have to also be mindful in many of our markets. We’ve talked about this in the past. A fixed wireless offering is based on the mobile network infrastructure in these markets. And while it’s hard to say that, some of our markets don’t have good service, many of them do not, and not being able to offer a great wireless product in our markets definitely doesn’t be as the opportunity to provide a reliable home broadband on a mobile architected infrastructure either.

I guess I would just add that, this is a pretty big shift for us and that we are not operating our systems any one size fits all way. We are innovating. We are testing. We are learning. We are trying things. We are measuring to see what, drives the needle. We’re talking to our customers. And it’s not just about price, Craig. It’s the whole customer journey, that we’re taking a look at, anything from what's their Wi-Fi experience like and making sure that we’re measuring their experience to the device, not just to the node, but every device in their home, for example. And just having a maniacal focus on reliability and using the tools of this century machine learning and AI to grab the data points that we have and take care of issues before they even become, noticeable by customers. So, it's a pretty multidimensional look at how we approach the customer segments.

Okay. Can you say anything about are these offers primarily first year discount, stepping up to a regular price as a two year discount, or are they at an everyday low?

It’s all over the board. It’s all over the board. There’s some of that. There’s some that are shorter term. There’s some that are longer term. There are some that are multi-step up over years. We’re testing all of it and learning, what the whole picture looks like, not just the take rates, meaning customers coming in the door, not just the selling rates of what packages they take when we market that, but what are the retention rates on the backside and the satisfaction as well.

But it’s very tactical, Craig, to the market and to the competitor. And I think our knowledge of who these competitors are, how they’re capitalized, where they are in their, in some cases, financially backed investment cycles and determine many of the different strategies that we approach and will continue to use. But in some cases, we’ve already seeing people raise price in those markets. And so we also have to be very mindful of the tenor of those so that, you can also respond in that way. And so, it's as Julie said, it is across the board, but it’s very tactical.

All right. Very helpful. Thank you very much.

Our next question comes from the line of Steven Cahall with Wells Fargo. Your line is open.

Yes. Thank you. I was wondering if we could just tie all this all together to talk about EBITDA growth a little bit. So, certainly appreciate that you’re experimenting and not doing the one size fits all approach anymore. And it sounds like, Julie, you said there’s going to be a bit of a journey here, so there might be a little more pressure on revenue growth than there has in the past. EBITDA was a little weaker in Q4. So, we’d just love to hear how we should think about EBITDA growth in in 2024? And the second part of the question is, with the more moderate capital spending in 2024 that you talked about, Todd, I think there was some pull-forward of like scalable infrastructure spend in ‘23. But is any of the moderation in capital spending just a response to a tougher competitive environment that may slow EBITDA growth? And so, that’ll just help you kind of keep the balance sheet conservative. I know that’s a lot? Thank you.

Yeah. I’ll hit on a few things there, Steve. Thanks for the question on the EBITDA growth side. I mean, right now, as you guys know, while we're at 5% penetration on video, that continues to be an accelerated decline, and it still does have some margin in it, although it’s also a declining margin, and that is one of the primary contributors to that EBITDA this quarter-over-quarter, being slightly down as you saw. I think it was like 120% of our revenue declines were video as our core products were up. As we continue to focus on long-term customer growth, acquisition, new customers, retention of existing customers and that long-term reliable experience for them, it’s going to be that factor that we have to continue to learn from, right. And we have to continue to focus on how can we expand that penetration. And as Julie, was outlining, it’s not just about price, but price will be a tool in certain areas, where we feel it's most appropriate. But, the video decline is your core contributor to where the EBITDA weakness is. But again, as you see margins increasing this quarter, our highest margin products continue to be the healthiest. As it relates to the spending, I wouldn’t say it’s in a response to a tougher environment. It’s really as a result of how proactive we’ve been in investing in these markets. 4.0 architecture is basically complete, until the actives are generally available, but we’ve been spending considerably in that. We did bring forward some discounted equipment. We did accelerate some projects related to, the government programs that we’re going to be funding those for the next 15 years. So, that was in, for the most part, some of the incremental investment, and throughout 2023, even 2022, when you think about the proactive network investments, but then some of the, I’ll call it, pull-forward into Q4. But, the go-forward is because of how proactive we’ve been in investing in the network.

And I might add, capital expenditures have been going down for two years. So in 2024, that’ll just make year three. So, it’s not something new that is being introduced. This is a trend. This is where we’ve been going. I would also note that we’re pretty well known amongst our peers for being pretty good at continuous improvement as it relates to being cost effective. I think you see that in part by our margins. And that is going to continue and ramp up. And we are having a full court press on integrations in ‘24 as well. So, bringing all the family of brands that are not yet Sparklight into the Sparklight brand and getting them on our platforms and just a tremendous amount of operational work going on by amazing teams in ‘24 that will help us on that side of the business as well. And since I’ve been with the company, which is almost 25 years now, our focus has been on free cash flow, and it’s going to continue to be.

Great. Thank you.

And we do have our last question from Brandon Nispel with KeyBanc Capital Markets. Your line is open.

Okay. Great. Most of mine have been addressed. But, I was wondering if, on ARPU, I was wondering if you could quantify one-time impacts this quarter. I think you mentioned two things, removing data caps and providing unlimited data. So, I was hoping you could quantify in terms of the impact on HSD ARPU. And then, on your website, on the Sparklight page, there’s a one gig service for $39.95 for 18 months. And, historically, you guys have not been as promotional on the front book and especially not for that period of time. So, I was hoping you could talk about, one, what the reception has been and two good decision behind putting that as sort of the lead product? Thanks.

Okay. Let’s see ARPU. Well, yes. So, I breaking down what happened to ARPU in the fourth quarter, which is what I think you’re asking for Brandon.

Yes.

Yes. Okay. So, the majority of the decrease came from promos and discounts with a piece of it coming from rate and the sort of shifting back of data, if you will. So, new customers that come on in certain markets yet data unlimited data included in their package rates. Package rates have stayed the same in those markets but they’re getting unlimited and sort of a perk, if you will, where we used to have data guidelines, and that would result in fees to us. So, if you’re a new customer in those markets, you don’t have that anymore. The $39.95, I’m trying to look and see what mark, it is literally one size does not fit all every almost every market or every segment within a market has some element of variable pricing. So, if our normal rates are still 70, 80, 90 for 300, 600 a gig. You could see promos in the marketplace. But generally speaking, a promo for a gig would be $69.95 or $70. So, if you’re looking at a rate of $39, you’re looking at a market that is I’m trying to find one. Oh, let's see. Do you know what market you looked at? Because that would be

Just Sparklight.com.

Yes.

The [indiscernible] page.

Yes. We would have had to had a market, ZIP code, I think. But there are markets where we are offering that, and those are hyper competitive marketplaces. And we're driving gig selling and we believe that in the future we'll be able to monetize that, more. But the other piece of that is the sell in, that in part is to get the phone to ring, right. In those markets, we might actually have a multi-gig product that we could upsell on unless we're getting some of them.

If I could follow-up, you mentioned 80% of your customers you're selling is at 300 megs or above. What type of intake ARPUs are you seeing with the service? And then I wanted to ask about ACP since you mentioned, I think it grew quite a bit sequentially. I think last quarter you mentioned you had 35,000 customers on ACP. Now it's 50,000. So that implies sort of the base core customers was down quite a bit this quarter. So hoping you could help unpack that a little bit? Thanks.

Yes. Hey, Brandon, on the ACP side, it's a little bit north 35,000, but now it's a little south of 50,000. I think important to note that it's less than 10,000 that are in the fully funded category there, where they're in that kind of baseline pricing and packaging that effectively provides them with free Internet. And that's probably more, I would call it, susceptible customer base, but we're already working with all of those customers in terms of what that transition will look like assuming that the program does go away.

Yes. The majority of the customers were our customers before they signed up for ACP. So, they used ACP to increase the tier of service that they received and so again we can go and look at what they're paying now and what their usage is now. And make sure that we position them nicely into something that that they can afford. And I'm going to have to get back with you, Brandon. I don't think I know that ARPU of our selling for the fourth quarter off the top of my head.

Well, we don't disclose that anyway.

And there you go.

Thanks for taking the questions.

You're welcome.

There are no further questions at this time. Ms. Laulis, I turn the call back over to you.

Thank you, Desiree. So before closing, I would like to again thank our associates for their insights, ideas, and efforts, which make the difference in our pursuit of market share growth. Thank you everyone for your time and attention today. We appreciate your continued support and interest in Cable One.

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect.